Individual Performance Commitment and

Review Form
NAME OF : NAME OF RATER : NIEVES M. EBON
EMPLOYEE
POSITION : TEACHER I-III POSITION : PRINCIPAL lll
REVIEW PERIOD : S.Y. 2016-2017 DATE OF : APRIL 2017
REVIEW
BUREAUCENTER/SERVICE/DI : ILIGAN CITY
VISION
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
TIMELIN Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES ACTUAL RESULTS
E per KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Q E T AVE RATING SCORE*
Prepared lesson plans and daily lesson logs with All daily lesson plans had the following objective, subject
appropriate and adequate instructional materials to matter, evaluation and assignment
be submitted every Thursday O (5) = Submitted on Monday or Tuesday
A. Submitted DLL VS (4) = submitted on Wednesday
S (3) = submitted on Thursdays
US 2) = submitted on Friday
P (1) = none at all

B. Prepared IMs One instructional material per subject taught

O (5) = 100% US (2) = 25%
VS (4) = 75% P (1) = 0%
S (3) = 50%
TEACHER-
Facilitated learning through functional daily logs and JUNE Pupils achievement in the formative test
LEARNING innovative teaching strategies and checked on time 2016-2017
30%
O (5) = 97 100% US (2) = 70-74%
PROCESS VS (4) = 86-96% P (1) = 70% below
S (3) 75-85%

BASIC Initiated discipline of the pupils including classroom Number of pupils rated A (outstanding) in character building
EDUCATION rules and guidelines and individual group tasks activities as evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card.
SERVICES O (5) = 80-100% US (2) = 65-69%
VS (4) = 75-79% P (1) = 65 below
S (3) = 70-74%

Monitored attendance, diversity appreciation, safe, Percentage of pupils attendance

positive and motivating environment O (5) = 85-100% US (2) = 55-64%
VS (4) = 75-84% P (1) = 54% below
S (3) = 65-74%

I. TOTAL RATING (divided by 5)

Monitored and evaluated and maintained pupils Accomplished the following forms
progress Form 1 Test Bank with TOS
Form 2 Phil IRI/EGRA/SREA
Pupils Portfolio Nutritional Status
Form 137 Oral Reading Report
 30% Form 138
O (5) = Complete US (2) = 3 lacking
VS (4) = 1 lacking P (1) = 4 lacking
S (3) = 2 lacking
Assessed Learning Outcomes
O (5) = Increased NAT result within the target of 75%
PUPILS VS (4) = Meet the target of 75%
OUTCOMES S (3) = Increased NAT results 2% from the baseline
US (2) = Decreased NAT results by .01-1.99% from
the baseline
P (1) = Decreased NAT results by 2% from baseline

Conducted remediation/enrichment programs to

improve performance indicators Conducted remediation teaching to increase the MPS and PL
documented in remediation notebook.
O (5) = 130% and above MPS/GSA
VS (4) = 115-129% MPS/GSA
S (3) = 100-114% MPS/GSA
US (2) = 51-99% MPS/GSA
P (1) = 50 and below MPS/GSA
JUNE
Attained the required GSA for Grade level and 2016-2017
learning areas quarterly 2% increase in MPS from the baseline and 50% PL
from _________ to _________ MPS and 50% PL O (5) = 130% and above MPS/GSA
from ________ to ___________ VS (4) = 115-129% MPS/GSA
BASIC S (3) = 100-114% MPS/GSA
EDUCATION US (2) = 51-99% MPS/GSA
SERVICES P (1) = 50 and below MPS/GSA

Increased enrolment rate;

from enrolment SY 2015-2016 _______ to O (5) = increased enrolment rate
SY 2016-2017 _______ ; S (3) = decreased enrolment rate
Increased promotion rate; O (5) = increased promotion rate
from beginning of SY 2015-2016 to ______ S (3) = decreased promotion rate
promoted in the end of the school year.

Decreased drop-out rate. O (5) = decreased drop-out rate

from SY 2015-2016 drop-out ________ to 2016- S (3) = increased drop out rate
2017-_______

Decreased repetition rate. O (5) = decreased failure rate

from _______ EOSY 2015-2016 to S (3) = increased failure rate
_______EOSY 2016-2017 pupils who failed

II. TOTAL RATING (divided by 5)

Conducted regular PTA meetings/conferences
Conducted PTA meetings/conference
O (5) = 5 or more meetings conducted
VS (4) = 4 meetings
S (3) = 3 meetings
US (2) = 2 meetings
P (1) = no meetings conducted

COMMUNITY Visited parents of pupils needing academic/follow-

ups JUNE 25% Conducted home visitation to parents whole with parents
INVOLVEME 2016-2017 agreement and signature
NTS O (5) = 4 home visitation
 VS (4) = 3 home visitation
S (3) = 2 home visitation
US (2) = 1 home visitation
P (1) = no visitation

Undertaken/initiated projects /events/activities with

BASIC external funding/sponsorship Accomplished projects/events with sponsorship
EDUCATION O (5) = 130% and above project accomplishment with full
SERVICES documents report on completion
VS (4) = 115-129% accomplishment with partial completion
S (3) = 100-114% project initiative only with no completion
report
Us (2) = 51-99% initiative only with no completion report
P (1) = No project/event/activity initiated

III. TOTAL RATING (divide by 3)

Conducted problem/classroom based action research
Conducted CI action research
O (5) = 1 action research conducted with full
documentation and completion of
interventions and adapted
VS (4) =- 1 action research conducted with full
documentation completion of interventions
S (3) = identified classroom/learning problems
with research proposal
US (2) = only classroom/learning/problems/
issues identified
P (1) = none at all
Participated in activities such as teachers
association, etc. Initiated and participated the following
School association, district association, ICSPTEA (updated
payment), SLAI
O (5) = 4 associations
VS (4) = 3 associations
S (3) = 2 associations
US (2) = 1 association
P (1) = no association

Produced publications/creative work for school Produced publications:

PERSONAL paper/division publication O (5) = Produced publication/creative work
GROWTH published in National circulation/DepEd
AND Post/CSC Newsletter and similar publications
DEVELOPME VS (4) = Produced publication/creative work
published in regional publications
NT S (3) = Produced publication/creative work
published in division level
JUNE 15% US (2) = Produced publication/creative work
2016-2017 published in school papers
P (1) = Unpublished work produced

Receive special awards/citations/recognition for Received awards and certificates of recognition

exemplary performance O (5) = 4 Awards in School/District/ Division Level
VS (4) = 3 Awards in School/District/ Division Level
S (3) = 2 Awards in School/District/ Division Level
US (2) = Award in School/District/ Division Level
P (1)= no participation
 updated myself with recent developments in Update oneself with recent developments
education through readings, attendance in continuing O (5) = full pledge PhD or with doctoral units
professional education, or training/seminars and VS(4) = Master degree program graduate
similar activities S (3) = with more than 20 masters program units
US (2) = with less than 20 masters program units
P (1) = no units at all
Observed Professionalism Possessed the following personal and professional
characteristics such as (Decisiveness ,Honesty/ Integrity,
Dedication & Commitment, Initiative/ & Resourcefulness,
Courtesy, Punctuality, Proper Attire and Good Grooming,
Human Relation, Leadership, Stress Tolerance, Fairness and
Justice)
5 Presence of the 15 attributes
4 Presence of the 10 attributes
3 Presence of the 7 attributes
2 Presence of the 5 attributes
1 Presence of the 3 attributes
IV. TOTAL RATING (divide by 6)
TOTAL RATING

I. TEACHER-LEARNING PROCESS
II. PUPILS OUTCOMES
III. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENTS
IV.PERSONAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT

OVER ALL PERFORMANCE

RATING

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

NIEVES M. EBON
_________________
Principal lll
Teacher -
Rater
Ratee

DEPED RPMS form Teachers I-3

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING

4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor