Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
WASTE FACILITIES
Waste Facilities
44 17 13
dedicated Project
23 Sanitary
landfills will be
in operation
Safe Closure
of landfills
Transfer
Stations
Integrated
Facilities
Management
Team within JPSPN
(37 Contract staff -
JPSPN); 22 Direct
Hire SWCorp)
INVESTMENT VALUE CREATION Siting & Zoning
(close proximity to
Value to the Government 220MW ofPotential to generate
220MW renewable
demand site)
RM129.6m years
acquisition costs for 20 month New set of skills
CAPEX (to avoid to acquire
518 hectares of new land)
40% Waste diversion
from landfill
(HR issues) via
knowledge transfer
Potential savings Maintenance,
OPEX RM16m p.a on leachate Value to the Rakyat Repair, & Overhaul
treatment costs
(MRO), and parts
RM818m/annum Potential savings by govt (if
Reduction potential
5.8m GHGavoidance of 5.8million
tonnes of CO2, equivalent to
companies supply
chain
RM5.2bn business as usual, govt may
needs to fork out RM11.9bn)
1.2m 1.2million of car emission on
the road per year
Potential creation of more than 2,500 employment Potential creation of more than 2,500 employment
to manage new waste facilities with new skillset in to manage new waste facilities with new skillset in
Waste Treatment Technology Waste Treatment Technology
2,500
Our Problem Statement
Current Solid Waste Facility Management Framework is NOT sustainable
0.7%
10.5%
Why is our current system would not
sustain?....
Indonesia 0 70 17 13
Waste in
Asia, March
2011
Malaysia 10 89 1 -
Waste in
Asia, March
Philippines 0 85 10 5 2011
Singapore
Waste
Singapore 60 2 38 0 Statistics
2014
In nutshell - Different jurisdictions adopted a mix of
policies and measures in terms of breakdown of
Bangkok
Metropolitan recycled, incinerated and landfilled waste. Malaysia
Thailand 10 40 50 0 Administratio
n, 2010 is unique in that up until now we
have been relying almost 90% on
landfills for waste disposal.
* Note: The published Total Solid Waste Recycling rate is 59%. After excluding construction waste, sludge
and used slag, the solid waste recycling rate is 48%.
Source: Hong Kong Blueprint For Sustainable Use Of Resources 2013 2022
Malaysia aspires to divert 40% of waste from landfill by year 2020
To achieve this, treatment facilities are needed to addressed 30% of total
waste capacity
0.7%
We apprehend that
10.5% 18%
12,410 tonnes/ day we need to address
* 12%
this amount of
waste tonnage on
10% 4,137 tonnes/ day
every single day
88.8%
60%
60%
29,802 tonnes/ day
* Recycling
Energy Recovery
BAU 2020
Total tonnage : Landfill
41,368 tonnes/ day
Source: Lab analysis
* Recycling includes recyclables items direct sorting at
source that are collected by concessionaires
Targeted Solid Waste Operating Business Model:
To have 40% waste diversion from landfill by 2020, the below
To-Be Model is a prerequisite
To-Be Integrated Waste
Business As Usual
Management System (IWMS)
* Target of 30%
waste diversion
from landfill by
2020
Estimated % direct
from source
** Target of 10%
waste diversion Private Informal recyclables Private Processing Factory Industry
from landfill by 2020 collectors
Key criteria to only cover states under Act 672 Site selection criteria:
Perlis
(191 tpd) Kedah
(2,489 tpd)
Kelantan
(1,295 tpd) 1 Focus on conurbations &
sites with high density
population
Penang
(1,914 tpd)
Terengganu
Perak
(2,693 tpd)
Kuala
(1,398 tpd)
2 Focus on sites reaching
landfill design capacity
Lumpur
(3,191 tpd) Pahang
(1,666 tpd)
Selangor
(3,071 tpd)
Negeri Sembilan
(1,149 tpd) 3 Focus on sites with land
scarcity for new landfill
Johor
Planning
** EVO 1.0
(Landfills & Transfer Stations) - Construction
* Waste Data
Studies
Planning
** EVO 2.0
Treatment Facilities - Construction
2 Transfer Stations 15
and, the programme needs
3 Integrated Facility A (capacity >1,000 tpd) 5
to be supported by these
new additional 4 Integrated Facility B (capacity <1,000 tpd) 5
While working on Johor Model, the lab also concluded that there
is a need for Regional Waste Centralisation Treatment Facility,
facilitated by localised smaller capacity of transfer stations
WHY?
To reduce points of pollution
Better monitoring and enforcement from related agencies
Able to manage risk at a focal point
Eliminate redundancies in construction and operation of waste facilities
Economies of scale for all key stakeholders in the whole ecosystem (in terms of
capacity, and operation costs)
Reduce worries in findings land
Creation of centralised market with sufficient amount of feedstock and demand
for byproducts (recyclables, energy and other potential related recyclables
industries)
MD SP Kota tinggi
Simpang Bandar
MD 150tpd
Renggam Tenggara Kota Tinggi Intergrated A
MP
seelong (1,920tpd)
SP Muar Batu Pahat
550 tpd
BP : 270 tpd
Ponti MD
SP Pontian Kulai Intergrated B
an (320tpd)
200 tpd
200
Intergrated A tpd MD
SP Taruka
bukit Payong Pontian
400 tpd MBJB
(1500tpd)
LRT Pasir Gudang
500 tpd
MPPG
SP Tanjung
langsat
300tpd
Treatment Facilities
Land Acquisition 38 - 95 - - - - - 95
Planning - 50 50 52 - - - - 152
TOTAL (RM million) 125 473 1,292 1,663 1,380 1,275 450 6,657
NOTE: Estimated required investment if to cover all states in West Malaysia would be amounted to RM 9.8 billion
6,681mt of waste representing 16.2% of the total generated waste in West Malaysia (including the
states not under Act 672) vs our target of 30%
1ST
JOHOR AS PILOT MODEL
2ND
TO COVER OTHER STATES
UNDER ACT 672
3RD
NATIONWIDE (WEST MALAYSIA)
400,000
400,000 houses
per month
40%
Potential savings by govt Waste