Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Lindsey Stobaugh
13 November 2015
1
The country of Ukraine is positioned in Eastern Europe with Russia to its east, Poland,
Slovakia, and Hungary to its west, and Romania and Moldova to its south. The climate in
Ukraine is a temperate continental climate, which means the country has warm summers and
cold winters. There are two different biomes within Ukraine, which are mixed forests and steppe
(Geography of Ukraine). There are also a couple of mountain ranges in Ukraine, such as the
Carpathian Mountains, which are located in the western portion of the country, and the Crimean
Mountains which are in the southern part. Ukraine is rich with natural resources and it is
estimated that it holds one quarter of the earths black soil reserves, and it is considered to be the
best soil on the planet because of its physical, chemical, agrochemical, and mineralogical
properties. According to the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine, the
country contains 5% of the worlds natural resources and it is a world leader in terms of the
Crimea is the peninsula that is located in the southern part of Ukraine that is surrounded by the
Black Sea as well as the Azov Sea. There is a border between the Peninsula and Ukraine, which
is called the Sivash and encompasses large shallow lagoons and the Isthmus of Perekop connects
the Peninsula to Ukraine. The majority of Crimea has a temperate continental climate like that of
Ukraine, but in the south coast there is a humid subtropical climate (Crimea).
The independent Ukrainian state was established in 1991 as a result of the fall of the
Soviet Union in Russia. Seeing as the Soviet Union had encompassed many different territories
with people from many different backgrounds, when it collapsed, a lot of these ethnically diverse
people were forced together into one geographical boundary known as Ukraine (Gulamov).
When the Soviet Union was still in power, its citizens were not only Soviet citizens, but they
each had their own nationality as well, and many of the ethnic nationalist Russians ended up in
2
the borders of Ukraine (R.L.G.). Today, Ukraine consists of approximately 130 different
nationalities, with Russians making up the biggest ethnic minority group at about 17%. During
the time of the Russian Empire, the southern and eastern parts of what is today Ukraine belonged
to that Empire, and predominantly encompassed ethnic Russians as well as Ukrainians who
preferred to speak Russian. In contrast to the east, the western portion of the country has
exhibited Ukrainian nationalism, speaks Ukrainian, and are generally pro-European. Because of
these extreme differences in the populations national identity, it has been impossible to create
one national Ukrainian identity that encompasses the state as a whole (Gulamov). The state of
Ukraine has a long and complicated history. In 1917 a War of Independence broke out in
Ukraine, and the state gained its independence in 1921, but the Soviet Union absorbed the
resulting Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic soon thereafter. It was not until August 24, 1991
that Ukraine became officially independent when its parliament made an official statement
saying that Ukraine would seize to follow the laws of the USSR and only the laws of the
Ukrainian SSR (Modern History of Ukraine). With an overwhelming majority the people of
Ukraine voted to become independent of the USSR, and on December 6, 1991 the presidents of
the regions that made up the USSR met to officially disband the Soviet Union, and in accordance
with this the newly independent Ukraine was officially recognized (Modern History of
Ukraine).
The language and ethnic nationalist divide has played a large role in shaping the crisis
that is taking place today. Ukraine has not been able to establish a strong government as a result
of these sharp divides between its citizens, but this divide has also grown as a result of the failing
politics. This divide between the east and west can be clearly seen in presidential elections. As
stated before, the east of Ukraine is mostly Ukrainian Russian speaking or ethnic Russian, while
3
candidate, Viktor Yanukovych, won a majority of the votes in the eastern half of Ukraine, but
with this victory brought uproar from the west (R.L.G.). In response to Yanukovychs victory, the
east began to protest his victory through what is known as the Orange Revolution, and as a result
the election was ruled corrupted and it brought about a new president, Viktor Yushchenko. This
not only exemplified the rigid divide between eastern and western Ukraine, but it also added fuel
to the fire. In 2010, Yanukovych ran for president a second time and pulled out a victory by
tightening his network with Russia. Yanukovych almost signed a trade agreement with the
European Union in 2013, but this never happened because of Russias influence on Yanukovych.
The failure to sign this agreement brought about great unrest between the eastern and western
halves of Ukraine, and pro-Russian separatists began taking aggressive measures toward
government forces of Ukraine in April 2014. In May of 2014 another election was held and this
time, pro-Western Petro Poroshenko took power and tried to assert the power of the government
on the people in the east. Russia was accused of aiding the separatists by supplying them with
weapons, and while the country rejected these claims, they continued to send military troops near
Russian president Vladimir Putin used this cultural divide to his advantage in the issue of
the Crimean Peninsula in March of 2014. The Crimean Peninsula is important to Russia on an
monetary and military basis. Since Crimea is made up of mostly ethnic Russians and Russian
speaking Ukrainians, Putin claimed that he was shielding these people from lawlessness
spreading east from the capital and stated that Moscow is not imposing its will, but rather
supporting the free choice of the population. Putin set out to annex Crimea on March 18, 2014
and before doing so, he made a statement in which he said that Russia would protect the rights
4
of Russians abroad (McMahon). Before this crisis in Ukraine began, Crimea was an
independent Ukrainian Republic and its citizens mainly spoke Russian, and when Yanukovych
gained power, Crimean citizens voted for a union with Russia, and in response legislators in
Russia implemented their legislation over Crimea. The issue that Western powers such as the
United States has with this, is that they believe that Russia is in violation of international law,
which according to the Treaty of Friendship and the Cooperation between Russia and Ukraine,
both sides of this argument. On one hand, the people of Crimea voted and according to that vote,
they want to be a part of Russia, not Ukraine. They obviously voted this way because they
identify as Russians more than they do as Ukrainians, and to be forced to be a part of a country
where your nationality does not align with would be frustrating. On the other hand, though, I can
understand why Ukrainian officials would be against Russia controlling a region which has been
a part of their country for many years. It is hard for me to choose a side because I understand the
views of each of them, but I am leaning toward Russia controlling this region, only because of
the fact that the people of Crimea voted on this issue, and that is what a majority of those people
wanted.
In the article, Brokering Power: US Role in Ukraine Coup Hard to Overlook it is stated
that the US had been investing money into Ukriane since its independence in 1991 and that the
US claimed that this money was to assist Ukraininans in building democratic skills and
institutions. It goes on to say that the US claims that this money is used to create a positive
change and not to influence its own agenda in those countries that it sends funding to
(Brokering Power). I do not buy this because the United States did much more than just
send funding to Ukraine, and it exerted great effort to establish the type of government that they
5
wanted, rather than letting the Ukrainian government help itself. According to this article, the
Untied States supported the government coup with great zeal, and it is stated that some could not
separate the new Ukraine from an entity directly ruled by Washington (Brokering Power).
The author of this source obviously believes that the United States is meddling too much in
Ukraine, and that its influence is too great, and I can agree with this on a certain level. The US
favors a government that is pro-Western because they will be likely to work with them on certain
issues. So when a pro-Russian government took power and western Ukrainians began an uprising
on their own, all the US had to do was help those who were already against the new government,
and by doing this, the country can claim that it did not have any influence is starting a revolution,
rather that it is sending aid to help create a better government, in accordance with US
standards.
While the author of the first article exemplified some disdain of the United States
meddling in foreign affairs, the author of the article Chronology of the Ukrainian Coup Renee
Parsons exemplifies a firm anti-Western approach in her analysis of these events. She claims that
the US, along with the European Union, the IMF, and the World Bank have brought staggering
suffering to millions around the globe (Parsons). She states that after Ukraine chose not to join
the EU, and instead join the Russia Common Wealth Union, that western powers established a
goal to destabilize Ukraine. She makes claims that the US is backing a government that is
made up of neo-Nazis and neo-fascists that fought with Hitler. She states that the US was
planning to overthrow the Ukrainian government for at least a month, and when President
Yanukovych refused to give up his presidency, that the parliament voted to remove him from the
presidency after which he fled the country. Parsons believes the United States to be a country of
hypocrites that impose their agenda on all other countries, resulting in devastation for those
6
countries (Parsons). I thought Parsons perspective to be a little radical at first, but after reading
through the article I can understand where she is coming from. America does have a tendency to
stick its nose where it does not belong so that it may influence other countries to be more of what
America wants them to be. I believe that what is happening in Ukraine should be of mostly
Ukrainian concern, and that the US and other western powers should maybe back off a little. I
am not that extreme in my opinion as Parsons because I believe that countries need our
intervention sometimes, but the US needs to understand that what is best for other countries is
Works Cited
"BrokeringPower:USRoleinUkraineCoupHardtoOverlook."RTEnglish.N.p.,
19Feb.2015.Web.11Nov.2015.<https://www.rt.com/news/233439us meddling
ukrainecrisis/>.
"Crimea."Wikipedia.WikimediaFoundation,7Nov.2015.Web.09Nov.2015.
"GeographyofUkraine."Wikipedia.Google,30Oct.2015.Web.9Nov.2015.
"GeographicalLocationofUkraine."StateExportSupport.MinistryofEconomic
DevelopmentandTradeofUkraine,n.d.Web.09Nov.2015.
Gulamov,Sherzod."UnderstandingNationalIdentity:Ukraine'sEthnicDiversity|
EastWestInstitute."EastWest.ngo.N.p.,7May2014.Web.10Nov.2015.
<http://www.eastwest.ngo/idea/understandingnationalidentity
ukraine%E2%80%99sethnicdiversity>.
McMahon,Robert."UkraineinCrisis."CFRBackgrounders.CouncilonForeign Relations,25
Aug.2014.Web.11Nov.2015.
<http://www.cfr.org/ukraine/ukrainecrisis/p32540>.
"ModernHistoryofUkraine."Wikipedia.WikimediaFoundation,30Oct.2015. Web.10Nov.
2015.<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_history_of_Ukraine>.
Parsons,Renee."ChronologyoftheUkrainianCoup."Www.counterpunch.org. N.p.,05Mar.
2014.Web.11Nov.2015.
<http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/03/05/chronologyoftheukrainian coup/>.
R.L.G."Johnson:IsThereaSingleUkraine?"TheEconomist.N.p.,5Feb.2014. Web.10Nov.
2015. <http://www.economist.com/blogs/prospero/2014/02/linguisticdivides>.