Satyagraha
Cultural Psychology
Is Cicero the Father of Just War Theory?
with one comment
Introduction
Who is the father of Just War Theory? Some occasional nods in the direction of Plato and Aristotle
notwithstanding, this honor usually falls to St. Augustine, but there are good reasons to question that,
choice. Here we shall consider arguments for selecting the great Roman politician, orator andphilosopher, Cicero (106 BC 43 BC) for the distinction. At the same time we shall explore a second
question, one of perhaps more practical relevance, namely whether Cicero's writings may have
unique value to inform and clarify modern concepts of just warfare.
The Father of Just War Theory?
First we should note that Cicero (who wrote four centuries before St. Augustine), presents a clear just
war theory, acknowledging virtually all the commonly recognized principles associated with the just
war tradition. It helps that his main treatment of the subject occurs in one source, Book 1 of On Moral
Duties (De offciis), written close to the end of his life. There his just war theory is fully integrated
within a larger, cogent and consistent ethical framework. An integral connection of his just war
theory to his political thought is similarly found in a single source, his On the Commonwealth (De res
publica).
We should further consider the several ways in which Cicero was in a unique position to formulate a
just war theory. To begin, there is his political experience. Rising through the ranks of the Roman
cursus honorum, Cicero held progressively more responsible civil appointments, including that of
consul (i.e., one of two annually elected ‘presidents’ of the Roman Republic) in 63 BC, senatorship
thereafter, and, in 51 BC, governorship of the Roman province of Cilicia in Northern Turkey (where
he directly oversaw and participated in military actions.)
Cicero was also a direct witness and participant in the tumultuous political changes that marked the
transition between the Roman Republic and Roman Empire. These included numerous civil wars and
insurrections, international wars, conquests, threats of invasions, and, in general, military conflicts of
every form and scope. Moreover, Cicero was an intimate friend, relation, or working colleague of
many of the other Roman leaders and generals of the age, including Julius Caesar, Pompey, Octavian,
Cato the Younger, Brutus and Cassius. Combining this with his excellent knowledge of Greek
history, Cicero could command an immense amount of knowledge about warfare, politics, and law in
formulating his just war theory.
Itis of further help to us that Cicero was not just an excellent writer, but, in the estimation of many,
one of the greatest literary geniuses of history, being noted for exceptionally clear prose.
To these credentials we should add another important one: his unique command of the entire Greek
philosophical tradition since Socrates. Educated by the best philosophers of the times, Cicero freely
took and integrated what was best in each of the dominant philosophical schools that emerged in the
wake of Socrates: Platonism, Stoicism, Aristotelianism, and (to a lesser extent) Epicureanism. ‘The
Socratic philosophical tradition has obviously exerted enormous impact on the Western mind, and it
was Cicero who first integrated this into something like a coherent whole and considered its practical
implications.One might ask, If Cicero is so important for Just War Theory, why hasn’ this role been emphasized
previously? To address this we must first recognize that today’s Just War Theory has evolved almost
exclusively in the Christian tradition, and Cicero has, generally, been problematic for Christian
writers. Dismissing the superficial and somewhat irrelevant complaints lodged against him (e.g., that
he divorced his wife unfairly, or was either too eager, or too hesitant, to oppose the ambitious reforms
of Julius Caesar), some Christian writers have found it awkward to recognize the virtue and lofty
morality of the pagan, Cicero. As often happened, Cicero's ideas were absorbed by Christianity,
without due credit being given.
Not just Christian writers, but secular writers since the Enlightenment have also generally found little
use for Cicero, perhaps because they have deprecated his strong religious orientation. A contributing
factor is that one of Cicero's most important political works, On the Commonwealth (De res publica) was
lost for over a millennium until its rediscovery in 1820. The net result of these factors is that Cicero's
ideas on just war are much less known today than they deserve. A corollary of this, however, is that,
as his contributions become better known, they will almost certainly achieve greater appreciation.
Before proceeding further we should perhaps back up the claim that Cicero's writings include all the
main elements of what today we call Just War Theory. This topic is broadly treated by John Mark
Mattox in St. Augustine and the Theory of Just War, who supplies examples from Cicero’s writings of the
specific principles of just cause, last resort, comparative justice, right intention, public declaration,
proportionality, discrimination, and good faith. One may also easily identify these principles for
oneself with reference to a single, short section, On Moral Duties 1.11.33 - 1.13.41. A fuller treatment
of Cicero's just war principles and theory, however, rightly deserves a dedicated article or book.
A Modern Foundation?
As already suggested, precisely because Cicero's just war writings have been neglected by both
Christian and modern writers, his works now offer the general advantage of a fresh perspective with
many unique ideas, We may point to several specific examples of this, as described below.
‘The similarities between Cicero’s Rome and today’s United States are numerous, striking, and
important. Like today, Cicero's times were ones of immense cultural and political upheaval. Rome
was emerging as something like an unrivaled global super-power. The Roman military machine was
unparalleled in technological sophistication. Like today, imperial expansion was judged as an
economic necessity. But also like contemporary America, Cicero’s Rome was marked by a distinct
sense of exceptionalism, and a conviction that imperial ambitions were not entirely selfish. That is,
they were partly justified (or perhaps rationalized) as a humanitarian and mutually beneficial attempt
to unite all nations in a single, civilized community, where Rome was only a ‘first among equals’.Not only was Cicero an experienced politician himself, but the work that contains the es
just war theory, On Moral Duties, was written specifically as a long letter of advice to his son. Cicero
had every reason to expect his son would, like him, one day reach a position of leadership (the
younger Cicero did, in fact, later become consul). Cicero thus imbued this work with the kind of
loving attention and inspired wisdom characteristic of a parent. It is a very practical and honest work.
These complex factors, when blended with Cicero's characteristic warmth, kindness,
humanitarianism and love of country, produced a highly nuanced just war theory, something we
might call semi-realist in orientation, in contrast with the hard-line Realpolitik so typical today. For
example, at the same time Cicero can regret as inhumane and unnecessary the Roman destruction of
Corinth, yet accept as necessary (and, hence, just) the similar razing of Carthage. The difference was
that Carthage was a genuine threat and (in the Romans’ eyes) a brutal enemy, while Corinth was
merely a potential threat to Roman hegemony,
Last, we must give special attention to the distinctly religious orientation of Cicero’s works. Modern
cultural commentators have pointed to the desirability of developing a non-sectarian spiritual
framework for understanding and coping with the problems of the modern world. Ideally such a
framework should be compatible with basic religious beliefs common to all religions, and also
congenial to secular institutions like governments, public universities, etc. Cicero's just war theory,
along with the rest of his ethical writings, is firmly rooted in Platonic-Stoic religious ideas and virtue
ethics. In particular, it is wedded to Stoic Natural Law theory; this holds, basically, that all that
happens in the world is orchestrated by a Divine Intelligence, and that both justice and personal
happiness are achieved by acting in concord with this plan. Failure to do so — for example, to wage
war unjustly — must necessarily meet with divine disapproval and corrective punishment. ‘This
provides an additional incentive for nations to act justly. Importantly, this framework establishes a
basis for judging an action moral or immoral that is absolute, not relative or merely based on
expedience or utility. Indeed, one of Cicero's main philosophical achievements is to drive home the
point that (in war, as generally), what is immoral can never truly be expedient or advantageous.
A second, related legacy of Cicero’s Stoic leanings is his emphasis on cosmopolitanism. That is, for
Cicero, all human beings, enemies included, are part of the human family, to all of whom we have
strong moral responsibilities.
As part of a non-sectarian religious philosophy, Cicero's just war theory is something that can be
discussed and developed by members of all religions on an equal footing - something equally
acceptable to Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Wiccans, New Age hippies, and agnostic
theists alike. At present, any serious discussion of religious or spiritual moral principles by
government officials, intellectuals, or public news media is a taboo. In consequence we have totally
dissociated Just War Theory from spiritual and transcendental principles, which is both ineffective
and absurd.
Let us, then, give Cicero's just war theory a unprejudiced and thorough look. We may discover that
Providence has, in his works, supplied many treasures,Written by John Uebersax
May 24, 2012 at 11:48 pm
Posted in Culture of peace, Imperialism, Just War Doctrine, Law, Moral philosophy, Peace,
Philosophy
One Response
Subscribe to comments with RSS.
[..-] Is Cicero the Father of Just War Theory? [...]
Cicero on Just War Theory « Satyagraha ~ Cultural Psychology
May 24, 2012 at 11:51 pm Edit
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.