Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Applied Energy
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apenergy
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The electrical efciency of photovoltaic (PV) cell is adversely affected by the signicant increase of cell
Received 23 September 2010 operating temperature during absorption of solar radiation. A hybrid photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) solar
Received in revised form 22 December 2010 system was designed, fabricated and experimentally investigated in this work. To actively cool the PV
Accepted 5 January 2011
cells, a parallel array of ducts with inlet/outlet manifold designed for uniform airow distribution was
Available online 4 February 2011
attached to the back of the PV panel. Experiments were performed with and without active cooling. A lin-
ear trend between the efciency and temperature was found. Without active cooling, the temperature of
Keywords:
the module was high and solar cells can only achieve an efciency of 89%. However, when the module
Hybrid photovoltaic/thermal system
Manifold design
was operated under active cooling condition, the temperature dropped signicantly leading to an
Active cooling increase in efciency of solar cells to between 12% and 14%. A heat transfer simulation model was devel-
Operating temperature oped to compare to the actual temperature prole of PV module and good agreement between the sim-
Cell efciency ulation and experimental results is obtained.
2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0306-2619/$ - see front matter 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.01.017
310 H.G. Teo et al. / Applied Energy 90 (2012) 309315
Nomenclature
PV/T system. Two types of PV module (glass to Tedlar and glass to teries. An array of air ducts that allowed air to pass through was
glass) were utilised to investigate the performance under the attached underneath the PV modules. Fins were tted in the duct
meteorological conditions of New Delhi. The results showed that to increase the heat transfer rate from the PV panel to the moving
the overall performance of hybrid thermal collector with PV mod- uid. The inlet/outlet manifold was carefully designed to ensure
ule glass-to-glass is better than glass-to-Tedlar. uniform airow distribution.
In this study, the main focus is on the comparison of the electri- A direct current blower, which was connected to the batteries,
cal efciency of the PV module with and without cooling. By vary- extracted air from the surrounding to cool the modules. During
ing the air ow rate through the duct, the electrical performance the operation, a maximum power point tracker (MPPT) was used
will also be investigated. In addition, a simulation model is devel- to modulate the power output from solar panel to ensure that
oped to examine the actual temperature prole of Photovoltaic cell the maximum electrical power is extracted. Another alternating
during operation. current (AC) blower was also used in this experiment because it
could function as variable speed blower, to control the ow rate
passing through the duct. The experiments were conducted from
2. Experiments
9:30 am to 5:00 pm. A pyranometer was used to capture the daily
global solar irradiation. Temperature measurements are important
A test setup was designed to investigate the thermal and elec-
in this experiment and therefore calibrated T-type thermocouples
trical performances of the PV/T air system. This system was in-
were utilised. In the experiment, PV current, PV voltage, tempera-
stalled on the roof top of EA building at the National University
ture of panels, temperatures air at inlet and outlet manifolds, wind
of Singapore. A schematic diagram of the complete experimental
speed and solar irradiation were collected.
set-up is shown in Fig. 1.
This experimental set-up was designed to investigate how the
temperature affects the efciency and power output of PV panel 3. Mathematical formulation
during operation. Four 55 watt polycrystalline solar modules were
used in the experiment to generate electricity. The electricity gen- The energy balance equations of the PV module are modied
erated by the solar modules was stored in four deep cycle gel bat- from Cox and Raghuraman [12]:
The total energy, Ec, absorbed by the PV cell is given by the fol-
lowing equation:
Ec pac sg Gt 1
Due to solar irradiation, the electrical energy, Ece, produced by
the PV cell is expressed by the following equation:
Ece ge psg Gt 2
and the thermal energy, Ect, released by the PV cell is as follows:
Ect 1 ge =ac pac sg Gt 3
where p is the cell packing factor which is dened as the ratio of
area of solar cell to the area of blank absorber; ge is the cell ef-
ciency represented as a function of the module temperature [13]
ge go 1 bT c T o 4
where go is nominal electrical efciency under standard condition
given by
V mp Imp
go 5
Fig. 1. A schematic diagram of the experimental set-up. GA
H.G. Teo et al. / Applied Energy 90 (2012) 309315 311
The rate of solar energy absorbed by Tedlar (material of back- 1 ge =ac pac sg Gt sg GtaT 1 p Eloss qc 7
sheet) after transmission from EVA (polymer encapsulant of solar
cell) is where Eloss is the energy losses from the front glass to environment
through the forced and free convection, and radiation. The solar col-
ET sg 1 paT Gt 6
lector was exposed to the ambient so that the heat loss is trans-
Principle of energy conservation is applied to the components of ferred by the top glass cover to the surrounding due to the
the PV module as shown below: combination of free and forced convection. Free convection is due
to the air near the collector surface, which gets heated up producing The convective heat transfer from the back of module can be
the natural buoyancy force on the air. Forced convection is caused presented by Newtons law of cooling:
by the wind.
qc hc Ac T b T a t 10
Eloss hg T g T a t eg rT 4g ag rT a t 64 8
where hc is given by [16]
and hg is the forced convective heat transfer coefcient of the glass
to the environment and an empirical correlation from Stultz and kf =8U m Pr
hc 11
Wen [14] report is used m1:07 12:7f =81=2 Pr2=3 1
hg 1:247T g T a t cos h1=3 2:658V 9 Pr is the Prandtl number, f is friction factor, Um is average veloc-
ity of air, m is kinematic viscosity and k is thermal conductivity.
where Tg is the glass temperature, Ta is the ambient temperature, eg
The energy balance of the air ow
is the emittance of the glass, h is the tilted angle of PV module, ag is
the absorptivity of glass and (Ta-6 C) is assumed to be the sky tem-
m C p T out T in qc 12
perature [15].
The thermal efciency can be computed with the following higher than the cooling one resulting in lower electrical efciency
equation: of the PV module.
The PV module temperature is linearly proportional to the
R irradiation and it is displayed in Fig. 6. With active cooling, the
m cp T o T i dt
gth R 13 temperature of module increases 1.4 C for every 100 W/m2 incre-
Ac Gtdt
ment of solar irradiation. However, if the PV module is not actively
cooled, the increase of temperature will be higher at 1.8 C for
The electrical efciency of the PV module can be described as
every 100 W/m2.
following equation:
Fig. 5 provides an indicative trend in the relation of electrical
R efciency and operating temperature. A linear relation can be
VIdt
ge R 14 obtained:
Ac Gtdt
gel 0:1577 0:0009T panel 16
The total efciency of the hybrid PV/T system is:
14
Electrical Efficiency (%)
Experimental Result
Theoretical Result
13
Electrical Efficiency
With Cooling
0.15
12 Without Cooling 0.14
0.13
11 0.12
0.11
10
0.1
9 0.09
0.08
8 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 60.00 65.00 70.00 Module Temperature (C)
Temperature (C)
Fig. 7. A comparison between theoretical and experimental results.
Fig. 5. Electrical efciency as a function of PV temperature.
Without Cooling
13.00
Module Temperature (C)
Fig. 6. Module temperature as a function of solar irradiation. Fig. 8. Inuence of ow rate on electrical efciency.
314 H.G. Teo et al. / Applied Energy 90 (2012) 309315
52 which did not fully capture the erratic uctuations in actual inso-
50 lation values from 12 pm to 2 pm.
48 Temperature prole of PV module is displayed in Fig. 12. The
46 maximum temperature of the module occurs at the silicon cell.
44 Experiment
Simulation
This is attributed to the high absorption of solar irradiation in sil-
42
icon cell. Temperature of Tedlar (backsheet) is higher than front
40
glass of PV module; this can be attributed to the closer location
38
9:47 10:21 10:51 11:19 11:58 12:04 13:20 13:52 15:42 16:02 16:25 of the silicon cell compared to the front glass even though the ther-
Time mal diffusivity of the glass is higher than Tedlar. In addition, the so-
lar irradiation with the wavelength more than 1.1 lm will transmit
Fig. 11. A comparison of simulation and experiment in the temperature prole of the silicon solar cell and absorbed by the Tedlar. It is because that
the back of PV module.
silicon cells are transparent to wavelengths longer than 1.1 lm and
Fig. 12. Temperature prole of the PV cell at 1:30 pm (highest solar radiation on that day).
H.G. Teo et al. / Applied Energy 90 (2012) 309315 315