To, May 6, 2017.

1. Administrative Secretary to the Animal Husbandry, Haryana.

2. Registrar, Punjab and Haryana High Court.

Subject: Animal rights and their welfare.

Greetings,

As per website www.hargauseva.gov.in functions of the Haryana Gau Seva Aayog shall be to:

Work for proper implementation of laws with respect to prohibition of slaughter and/or
cruelty to cow and to suggest improvement in the existing laws for making them more
meaningful;

Work for the welfare of cow in the State;

Educate, campaign and to make people aware about the economic benefits which can be
derived out of cow and arrange competitions to promote such awareness as also to preach
compassion for cow and take steps for inclusion in school syllabi such information;

Work in collaboration with any Veterinary, Animal Sciences or Agriculture University or

departments or organizations of the State /Central Government engaged in the task of
research in the field of breeding and rearing of cow, organic manure, bio-gas etc. as also to
collaborate with such of the research projects of Indian system of medicine conducted by
various public or private organizations for conducting research on the biogenic products of
the cow for medicinal purposes.

Formulate and submit schemes for the establishment of cottage / artisan industries in the
rural areas based on biogas product of cow as also based on skins, hides, bones of the
naturally dead cow for the purpose of manufacture of various products.

Observed many objectionable provisions, in the Haryana Gauvansh Sanrakshan and

Gausamvardhan Act, 2015 because the violation of section 19 of this Act have Zero punishment,
likewise major contradictions with the Haryana Prohibition of Cow Slaughtering Rules, 1972:

1. Section 4 (1) (c) of the said Act, allowed cow slaughtering, subjected to experimentation in the
interest of medical, veterinary and public health research, whereas experimentation on animals,
like rat, mice and gunny pigs are prohibited, likewise cosmetics tested on animals, also not allowed
to import in India.
2. Section 4 (3), removal of skin and hide from naturally dead cow are allowed, to the authorized
contractor and with the permission, same can be transported by them but what about horn, tallow
and bones of naturally dead cows, said Act is silent?

3. Section 8 of the said Act, allowed beef products, for medicinal purposes and in such form as may
be prescribed, whereas neither beef have medicinal qualities nor prescribed by any Authority.

4. Section 12 allowed establishments of laboratories for testing of milk, differentiation of beef from
the meat of other species of animals but how and why cow skin and hide be identified and certified
that same be removed from naturally dead cow?

5. Section 16 doesnt allow, any common citizen, to perform their fundamental duties, as defined
under article 51 A (g) of Indian Constitution.

6. Section 17 (2)(4), provide two opportunities to the owner of vehicle, involved in crime, before
order of confiscation and then before sale of confiscated vehicle, why twice?

7. Section 19 (2)(a to d) allowed to make rules for cow slaughter, as defined under section 4, whereas
experimentation on cows, seems to be objectionable.

8. Section 19 (2)(f) allowed, to make rules for beef or beef product can be sold under section 8,
whereas no need to frame any rules for this purpose, as explained above.

9. Section 19 (2)(i) allowed to make rules for cow transportation, either by road, rail and on foot,
whereas cow can be shifted in ISI specified vehicles, as per their shape and size, after obtaining pre
transport clearance about vehicles, as required under section 96 of the Cattle Transport Rules, 1978
amended in 2001 and 2009, besides it section 94 of the Haryana Motor Vehicle Rules and 11th
amendment in the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 2015, whereas mechanism of animal transportation
also upheld in the CWP No. 309 of 2003 by the Supreme Court of India.
# Declare Cow as state animal of Haryana, without disturbing black buck, as it was done in
Rajasthan, being camel and chinkara, as their state animals.

10. Section 20:

(1) repealed the Punjab Prohibition of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 and (2) allowed
anything done or any action taken under repealed Act and rules, shall be deemed to
have been done or taken under this Act, hence all under trials case property, like
vehicles involved needs to be confiscated. As per (3), Haryana Prohibition of Cow
Slaughter Rules, 1972 are adopted as rules, till new rules to be framed under this
Act, whereas this is totally contradictions in the legal provisions and cow definition,
because as per said rules:
2 (c) Medical purposes means the use of beef or beef products in the diet of
patients or for medicines as may be notified by the state Government.
7. Slaughter of a cow, which is objected to experimentation in the interest of medical
and public health research, likewise section 8 allowed license to sell or transport
beef and beef products for medicinal purpose, on FORM E, as per section 10,
feeding charges are fixed Rs. 20/-, hence Haryana Prohibition of Cow Slaughter
Rules, 1972 not acceptable.
As per section 15, which defined an offenses under section 13 are the cognizable and
non bailable in legal terms, hence all rules, to be made under section 19 be non
 cognizable and bailable in legal terms with zero punishment, meaning hereby
section 3, 4, 5 and 8 be the cognizable and non bailable in legal terms.

Abhishek Kadyan with Ms. Suman Malik Kadyan and Ms. Sukanya Kadyan Berwal has following
questions about lifting of samples of beef biryani in Mewat:

Whether:

1. Any Court stay or legal hitch to lodge FIR?

2. Report of cattle beef is not reliable?

3. Lifting of biryani samples were illegal and unlawful in the absence of FSSAI officials?

4. Cow progeny can't be treated as Cattle.

5. Muslim population became powerful then the laws of the land.

6. Hindu community, worship cow is wrong and against the feeling of the community.

7. Cow slaughtering is legal and its beef can be consumed as a part of human diet.

8. Beef have medicinal values and proved scientifically.

9. Haryana have surplus census of animals, to slaughter them for personal gain and profit and to
export their meat.

10. AOV Food slaughter house, recommended by the State Committee for Slaughter Houses,
constituted as per orders passed by the Supreme Court of India.

11. Animals and birds are being shifted in ISI specified vehicles, towards slaughter houses in
Haryana.

12. Slaughter houses became issue of votes and favour of a particular caste and communities.

13. Allow beef as diet on medical grounds, keeping in view the Haryana Prohibition of Cow
Slaughter Rules, 1972, which was reproduced in 2015 as well, besides it that, beef do not have
medicinal values not a single permission was granted.

Hence:

1. Honble Chief Justice, Punjab and Haryana High Court may treat it as Public Interest
Litigation, to set aside the Haryana Prohibition of Cow Slaughter Rules, 1972.
2. The Administrative Secretary to the Animal Husbandry may kindly consider the points, as
mentioned above for immediate disposal.
3. The UN affiliated OIPA Scouts and Guides for animals may kindly be allowed to conduct
training for animal rights and their welfare to the officers of Local Bodies, Panchyat, Police
and Animal Husbandry Department.
Sincerely yours,

Naresh Kadyan, Commissioner, Scouts and Guides, Haryana.