Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
White
HMU
126
Listening
Journal
Entry
1,
January
13th
Mozart
is
one
of
the
most
influential
and
renown
composers
of
all
time,
and
this
piece
is
a
perfect
example
of
what
made
him
so
popular
and
renowned.
Mozart
manages
to
create
memorable
and
creative
melodic
material
in
this
particular
composition.
The
intro
reminds
me
of
Tchaikovskys
1812
Overture,
which
is
a
great
way
to
begin
this
composition
as
well
to
show
how
Mozarts
voice
has
inspired
so
many
composers
after
him.
A
very
innovative
and
creative
composer
as
his
harmonic
language
was
slightly
chromatic
for
the
time,
creating
more
motion
and
contrast
than
what
was
heard
before
him.
Wolfgang
Amadeus
Mozart
was
a
very
skilled
composer,
often
writing
his
works
in
under
a
week.
I
find
Mozarts
works
to
be
a
bit
peppy
for
lack
of
a
better
term.
He
is
very
on
the
beat
and
staccato,
lacking
rhythmically,
which
can
get
boring
after
a
while.
There
is
no
doubt
that
Mozart
was
a
skilled
composer
and
revolutionary
for
his
time,
but
he
can
be
a
tough
guy
to
listen
to
for
a
long
period
of
time.
Perhaps
his
music
is
best
studied
as
integral
language
and
for
its
significance
in
the
world
of
western
music
than
listened
to
for
pleasure.
Understanding
and
respecting
tradition
does
not
always
mean
liking
every
single
piece
of
music
and/or
every
composer
in
existence,
but
the
knowledge
and
understanding
of
the
music
can
be
an
asset
to
any
composer,
performer
or
music
connoisseur.
Entry
3,
January
27th
Piano
Sonata
in
C
Minor,
Op.
13:
First
Movement,
Ludwig
van
Beethoven
Beethoven
is
a
composer
I
have
always
appreciated;
his
compositions
feel
like
they
are
taking
me
somewhere
and
the
theme
is
always
interrupted
in
an
elegant
way
where
I
welcome
the
shift
of
temporary
dissonance.
Pathetique
is
no
different
as
the
piece
twists
and
turns
as
it
evolves
taking
me
to
different
places
that
I
never
expected
to
be
during
the
opening
phase
of
the
composition.
His
dense
chords
always
help
create
a
more
rich
texture.
Most
classical
music
can
be
described
as
harmonically
simple
or
basic
but
when
I
listen
to
Beethoven
I
feel
like
the
heavier
voicings
make
up
for
the
simplicity
of
triads.
Beethoven
was
the
pinnacle
for
some
(the
conservatives)
and
just
the
beginning
for
others
(the
progressives)
but
regardless
he
was
celebrated
for
his
unique
voice
in
music.
This
particular
piece
has
a
beginning
that
suggests
that
of
sorrow
or
grief
but
is
later
answered
with
a
more
major
and
consonant
theme,
suggesting
that
the
grief
was
overcome.
This
was
also
uncommon
in
piano
sonatas,
as
they
didnt
typically
start
off
slow.
It
was
common
for
symphonies
to
have
this
characteristic
but
Beethoven
created
some
contrast
and
tweaked
the
sonata
in
a
small
but
effective
way,
which
separates
it
from
the
rest.
Pathetique
is
derived
from
the
Greek
word
pathos,
which
means
emotions.
This
reminds
me
of
a
term
I
heard
in
a
lecture,
Empfindsam.
This
was
described
to
me
as
an
emo
phase
in
the
period
where
melancholy
was
a
popular
theme
or
mood
in
the
music.
I
find
this
much
more
interesting
as
minor
songs
in
the
classical
world
have
a
stronger
character
and
a
much
more
memorable
theme
since
most
classical
compositions
are
not
very
rhythmic
in
nature,
the
major
aspect
can
be
tough
to
listen
to
because
harmonically
simple
music
with
no
rhythmic
sense
of
exploration
can
start
to
blend
together.
Entry
4,
February
3rd
This
has
to
be
my
favorite
piece
of
the
entire
listening
selections
for
the
course
so
far.
I
absolutely
love
Chopin
and
his
work,
and
he
is
by
far
my
favorite
of
the
romantic
composers.
Besides
being
a
virtuosic
performer,
Chopin
created
some
of
the
most
beautiful
pieces
of
music
to
my
ears
in
the
classical
realm.
This
one
is
an
ode
to
that
statement
and
it
really
shows
off
his
style
and
harmonic/melodic
capabilities.
Chopin
was
very
much
inspired
by
the
opera
and
opera
singers
of
his
time,
he
created
melodies
that
were
of
that
nature
in
his
mind.
This
led
to
what
I
believe
to
be
the
greatest
part
in
his
compositions:
melodies
that
are
lyrical
and
tuneful,
never
overdoing
it
or
favoring
technicality
to
musicality.
Although
some
of
his
compositions
can
be
more
note
heavy
and
range
more
in
contour
and
density,
his
music
can
always
be
broken
down
to
a
melodic
approach
with
the
appropriate
amount
of
motion
and
decorative
additions
to
create
a
memorable
and
solid
composition,
which
is
exactly
why
Chopin
has
stood
the
test
of
time.
There
is
a
small
fragment
or
cell
of
this
melody
which
can
be
traced
to
a
composition
years
later
by
Bill
Evans.
Bill
was
a
renowned
jazz
pianist
and
composer
who
studied
classical
music.
In
his
tune
Waltz
for
Debbie,
the
same
cellular
fragment
can
be
heard
in
the
bridge
suggesting
Chopin
influence
across
genres.
His
melodic
content
can
be
a
gold
mine
for
composers
looking
to
increase
their
melodic
palette
and
appreciation
for
simplicity
in
this
particular
piece.
Entry
6,
February
17th
Entry
7,
March
3
In
the
Steppes
of
Central
Asia,
Aleksander
Borodin
Entry
8,
The
Art
of
Noise
by
Luigi
Russolo
Luigi
Russolos
art
of
noise
was
a
fantastic
read.
I
found
the
idea
of
looking
at
music
in
an
evolutionary
perspective
though
time
as
a
means
of
justifying
the
advent
of
art
noise
to
be
an
enlightening
perspective.
The
idea
that
the
concept
of
sound
has
grown
through
various
cultures
and
eras
has
changed
our
perspective
of
what
musician
be
and
what
music
is.
Structures
that
were
never
thought
of
came
into
fruition
through
the
reflection
and
study
of
a
piece
after
the
fact,
rather
than
in
the
mind
of
the
composer
as
the
composition
unfolded.
Chords
where
an
after
thought
and
a
very
important
part
of
todays
music
because
of
this.
Luigi
discuses
how
noise
art
is
a
product
of
the
industrial
times,
that
machinery
was
the
next
element
in
the
evolution
of
sound.
Of
course
because
we
noise
is
much
more
common
due
to
factory
labor,
it
is
much
less
stimulating
and
fails
to
arouse
interest.
The
same
can
be
said
for
the
music
of
the
past,
and
this
is
why
the
search
for
more
compelling
harmonic
and
melodic
structures
is
required
to
pave
the
way
of
the
future
and
to
say
what
has
not
been
said
already.
Russolos
idea
to
achieve
this
is
to
break
away
from
the
pure
sounds
and
venture
into
the
world
of
noise
sounds.
While
I
dont
agree
with
the
idea
that
it
is
infinitely
more
pleasurable
to
extract
art
from
the
sounds
of
everyday
machinery,
he
does
raise
a
point
about
the
idea
of
evolution
and
growth
that
I
relate
to
and
completely
support.
The
last
half
of
the
reading
I
start
to
lose
sympathy
and
understanding
as
he
pushes
more
on
the
idea
of
noise
having
a
greater
effect
and
importance
than
traditional
instruments
in
the
world
of
music.
The
most
important
idea
I
got
out
of
this
reading
was
the
idea
of
connecting
the
imagery
and
structure
of
noise
to
music.
This
can
create
more
structure
and
story
in
composition
and
stir
the
imagination
to
places
its
never
been.