Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract. Many drinking water treatment plants are currently using alternative disinfectants to treat
drinking water, with ozone, chlorine dioxide, and chloramine being the most popular. However,
compared to chlorine, which has been much more widely studied, there is little information about the
disinfection by-products (DBPs) that these alternative disinfectants produce. Thus, it is not known
if the DBPs from alternative disinfectants are safer or more hazardous than those formed by chlorine.
To answer this question, we have set out to comprehensively identify DBPs formed by these
alternative disinfectants, as well as by chlorine. The results presented here represent a compilation
of the last 8 years of our research in identifying new DBPs from ozone, chlorine dioxide, chloramine,
and chlorine. We also include results from recent studies of Israel drinking water disinfected with
both chlorine dioxide and chloramine. Over 200 DBPs were identified, many of which have never
been reported. In comparing by-products formed by the different disinfectants, ozone, chlorine
dioxide, and chloramine formed fewer halogenated DBPs than chlorine.
Keywords: chloramine, chlorine, chlorine dioxide, disinfection by-products, drinking water, ozone
1. Introduction
Although chlorine has been used to disinfect drinking water for approximately 100
years, there have been concerns raised over its use due to the formation of some
potentially hazardous by-products. Of the more than 300 disinfection by-products
(DBPs) that have been reported formed from chlorine treatment (Richardson, 1998),
at least four of them--chloroform, bromodichloromethane, bromoform, and MX (3-
chloro-4-(dichloromethyl)-4-oxobutenoic acid)--have been shown to cause cancer
in laboratory animals (Bull and F.C. Kopfler, 1991; Komulainen et al., 1997).
Potential adverse health effects for many of the other reported chlorine DBPs are not
known, as appropriate health effects studies have not been carried out. Because of
these concerns, alternative disinfectants are being explored. Ozone, chlorine
dioxide, and chloramine are popular alternatives, as they are effective against
microorganisms, and do not form appreciable levels of the chlorine-containing
by-products that are of concern. However, compared to chlorine, which has been
much more widely studied, there is little information about the disinfection by-
products (DBPs) that these alternative disinfectants produce. Thus, it is not known
if the DBPs from alternative disinfectants are safer or more hazardous than those
formed by chlorine. To answer this question, we have set out to comprehensively
identify DBPs formed by these alternative disinfectants, as well as by chlorine.
Most of the drinking water samples were taken from locations in the United States;
however, results from recent studies of Israel drinking water, which is disinfected
with both chlorine dioxide and chloramine, are also included. Because Israels
source water (Lake Kinneret - the Sea of Galilee) contains natural levels of bromide
that are among the highest in the world, it offered a unique opportunity to study the
effect of elevated bromide levels on the formation of chlorine dioxide DBPs. DBP
studies typically target a few expected chemicals in the drinking water. Due to
advanced instrumentation available in our laboratory, we were able to carry out more
comprehensive DBP studies, with the ability to identify new DBPs that are not
present in mass spectral library databases. In this paper, we report the successful
identification of many DBPs from the alternative disinfectants and from chlorine,
many of which have not been previously reported.
2. Experimental
Ozonated water was collected from three sources: 1) a full-scale ozone treatment
plant in Valdosta, GA, 2) a pilot ozonation plant in Jefferson Parish, LA, and 3)
laboratory-scale ozonations carried out on Suwannee River humic and fulvic acid-
fortified distilled water (5 mg/L), with an ozone dose of 2:1 ozone:dissolved organic
carbon (DOC). Samples were concentrated using XAD resins. Additional
experimental details are similar to those in a previous study (Richardson et al.,
1994). Secondary chlorine and chloramine were applied to some ozone samples
collected from the Jefferson Parish pilot plant, in amounts to achieve residuals of 2
to 3 mg/L. The effect of bromide was studied by adding 1.0 ppm sodium bromide
to the raw water prior to disinfection.
Chlorine dioxide-treated water was collected from a pilot drinking water
treatment plant in Evansville, Indiana, and from two full-scale treatment plants in
Israel. For the samples taken in Evansville, IN, secondary chlorine was applied to
some of the chlorine dioxide treated samples, in amounts to obtain a free chlorine
residual of 2 to 3 mg/L; additional experimental details for these samples can be
found elsewhere (Richardson et al., 1994). For water collected from the two full-
scale plants in Israel, the following treatment conditions applied. At the first plant:
0.75 ppm chlorine dioxide was applied, along with 0.6 ppm of chloramine, which
was generated with 0.8 ppm chlorine and excess ammonia. Residual disinfectant
levels at the time of the sampling were 0.0 ppm free chlorine, 0.0 ppm chlorine
97
dioxide, and 0.6 ppm chloramine. At the second plant, 0.85 ppm chlorine dioxide
was applied (without additional chloramine treatment). The residual disinfectant
level of chlorine dioxide at the time of the sampling was 0.35 ppm. Samples were
concentrated using XAD resins.
Low and high resolution gas chromatography-electron ionization mass
spectrometry (GC/EI-MS) analyses were performed on a VG 70-SEQ high-
resolution hybrid mass spectrometer, equipped with a Hewlett Packard model 5890A
gas chromatograph and a DB-5 column. Low resolution experiments were carried
out at 1000 resolution; high resolution experiments at 10,000. Chemical ionization
mass spectrometry (CI-MS) experiments were carried out on a Finnigan TSQ 7000
triple quadrupole mass spectrometer using methane gas. LC/MS analyses were
accomplished using a Hewlett Packard 1050 LC coupled to a Fisons Platform
quadrupole mass spectrometer. Electrospray ionization was used with a flow rate
of 0.3 mL/min and a source temperature of 160oC. Samples (50 L) were injected
onto a Supelco Supelcosil C18 LC column (5 m particle size, 150 x 2.1 mm i.d.),
which was eluted using a gradient of 50:50 acetonitrile/water to 98:2
acetonitrile/water over 1 hour. Gas chromatography/infrared spectroscopy (GC/IR)
analyses were performed on a Hewlett Packard Model 5890 Series II GC (with
Restek Rtx-5 column) interfaced to a Hewlett Packard Model 5965B infrared
detector (IRD).
for determining the functional group. When available, standards were purchased
to confirm difficult identifications and to determine a particular isomer precisely,
when spectra were not conclusive. Because it is believed that many of the
unidentified DBPs from ozone are located in the polar fraction, which cannot be
easily extracted from water, we also applied two derivatization procedures coupled
with either GC/MS or liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS). The
first derivatization procedure involved the use of pentafluorobenzylhydroxylamine
(PFBHA), which reacts with small, polar aldehydes and ketones to form nonpolar
oximes that can be easily extracted into an organic solvent and analyzed by GC/MS
(Glaze and Weinberg, 1993). The second derivatization procedure involved the
use of 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) (Grosjean and Grosjean, 1995),
followed by LC/MS analysis, and has not been applied previously for the
identification of DBPs. DNPH also reacts with the carbonyl group of aldehydes and
ketones, but, unlike PFBHA, it permits the analysis of highly polar compounds
(with multiple polar substituents). Using these approaches, we were able to
successfully identify some polar aldehydes and ketones that were DBPs of ozone.
TABLE I
Ozone DBPs Identified
DBPs
Carboxylic acids: 2-methyl propanoic acid, butanoic acid, 3-methyl butanoic acid, pentanoic
acid, hexanoic acid, heptanoic acid, octanoic acid, nonanoic acid, decanoic acid, undecanoic
acid, dodecanoic acid, tridecanoic acid, tetradecanoic acid, pentadecanoic acid, hexadecanoic
acid, heptadecanoic acid, octadecanoic acid, phenylacetic acid, benzoic acid, ethanedioic acid,
propanedioic acid, butanedioic acid, 2-ethyl-3-methyl maleic acid, tert-butyl maleic acid,
pentanedioic acid, hexanedioic acid, heptanedioic acid, octanedioic acid, nonanedioic acid,
decanedioic acid, undecanedioic acid, tridecanedioic acid, phthalic acid, isophthalic acid,
terephthalic acid, 1,2,4-benzenetricarboxylic acid, 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid,
1,2,4,5-benzenetetracarboxylic acid, 1,2,3,4-benzenetetracarboxylic acid,
1,2,3,5-benzenetetracarboxylic acid
TABLE II
Halogenated Ozone-Chlorine and Ozone-Chloramine DBPs Identified
Halogenated DBPs
When elevated levels of bromide (1.0 ppm) were added to the water prior to
ozonation, only one brominated by-product--dibromoacetonitrile--was found. Many
more by-products were identified when secondary chlorine or chloramine was
applied after ozonation. When comparing low-bromide water to water with elevated
bromide, a tremendous shift in speciation was observed for samples treated with
secondary chlorine or chloramine. In the absence of elevated bromide levels,
chlorinated species dominate (e.g., chloroform, trichloroacetaldehyde,
tetrachloropropanone, dichloroacetonitrile, trichloronitromethane); with elevated
bromide levels, these shift to brominated species (e.g., bromoform,
tribromoacetaldehyde, tetrabromopropanone, dibromoacetonitrile,
tribromonitromethane). Additional details will be available elsewhere (Richardson
et al., in press).
TABLE III
Chlorine Dioxide Disinfection By-products Identified in Evansville, Indiana Drinking Water
DBPs
Carboxylic acids: butanoic acid, pentanoic acid, hexanoic acid, heptanoic acid, 2-ethylhexanoic
acid, octanoic acid, nonanoic acid, decanoic acid, undecanoic acid, tridecanoic acid, tetradecanoic
acid, hexadecanoic acid, 2-tert-butylmaleic acid, 2-ethyl-3-methylmaleic acid, benzoic acid
Ketones:2,3,4-trimethylcyclopent-2-en-1-one,2,6,6-trimethyl-2-cyclohexene-1,4-dione
CH3
CH2 Br OH
Br CH2 Br
CH3 CH3
CH3
Br CH3
Br CH3 CH3
CH3 CH3
Br Br CH3 CH3 Br OH
OH
CH3 CH3 Br Cl
Br Br Br CH3
Br Br
OCH3 OCH3 Br OH
CH3
OCH3 Br CH3
4. Conclusions
In comparing the different disinfectants studied, chlorine formed the largest number
of halogenated by-products. Chloramine produced the same types of halogenated
by-products as chlorine, but they were fewer in number and lower in concentration
than for chlorine. Ozone produced no halogenated by-products, except for
dibromoacetonitrile, which was formed in the presence of elevated bromide levels.
In the absence of elevated bromide levels, chlorine dioxide produced relatively few
DBPs, with only two halogenated DBPs observed. When elevated bromide levels
were present, as in the case of the Israel drinking water, a host of brominated
compounds was observed, including 1,1,3,3-tetrabromopropanone, which is the
brominated analog of 1,1,3,3-tetrachloropropanone--a DBP found with chlorine
dioxide treatment in the absence of elevated bromide. Non-halogenated DBPs were
quite similar for all of the different disinfectants studied (e.g., carboxylic acids,
aldehydes, etc.).
References
Bull, R. J. and Kopfler, F. C.: 1991, Health Effects of Disinfectants and Disinfection By-products,
AWWA Research Foundation, Denver, CO.
Glaze, W. H. and Weinberg, H. S.: 1993, Identification and Occurrence of Ozonation By-Products
in Drinking Water, American Water Works Association Research Foundation, Denver, CO.
Grosjean, E. and Grosjean, D.: 1995, Liquid Chromatographic Analysis of C1-C10 Carbonyls. Intern.
J.Environ. Anal. Chem. 61, 47-64.
Komulainen, H., Kosma, V. -M., Vaittinen, S. -L., Vartianinen, T., Kaliste-Korhonen, E., Lotjonen,
S., Tuominen, R. K. and Tuomisto, J.; 1997, Carcinogenicity of the Drinking Water Mutagen 3-
Chloro-4-(dichloromethyl)-5-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanon, .J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 89, 848-856.
Richardson, S. D., Thruston, Jr . A. D., Collette, T. W., Patterson, K. S., Lykins, Jr. B. W., Majetich,
G. and Zhang, Y.: 1994, Multispectral Identification of Chlorine Dioxide Disinfection By-
products in Drinking Water, Environ. Sci. Technol. 28, 592-599.
Richardson, S. D.: 1998, Drinking Water Disinfection By-products, in R.A. Meyers (ed), The
Encyclopedia of Environmental Analysis & Remediation, vol. 3, John Wiley & Sons, New York,
1898-1421.
Richardson, S. D., Thruston, Jr. A. D., Caughran, T. V., Chen, P. H., Collette, T. W., Floyd, T. L.,
Patterson, K. S., Lykins, Jr. B. W., Sun , G. and Majetich, G. (in press), Identification of New
Drinking Water Disinfection By-products Formed in the Presence of Bromide, Environ. Sci. Technol.