Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
diagnosed
in pregnancy
BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the third most common gynecologic malignancy in
the United States. Approximately 1-3% of cervical cancers will be diagnosed in
pregnant and peripartum women; optimal management in the setting of pregnancy
is not always clear.
RESULTS: In all, 28 women diagnosed with cervical cancer during pregnancy were
identified from 1997 through 2013. The majority were Stage IB1. In all, 25% (7/28)
of women terminated the pregnancy; these women were more likely to be
diagnosed earlier in pregnancy (10.9 vs 19.7 weeks, P= .006). For those who did not
terminate, mean gestational age at delivery was 36.1 weeks. Pregnancy
complications were uncommon. Complication rates in pregnant women undergoing
radical hysterectomy were similar to those outside of pregnancy. Time to treatment
was significantly longer for pregnant women compared to nonpregnant patients
(20.8 vs 7.9 weeks, P = .0014) but there was no survival difference between groups
(89.3% vs 95.2%, P = .08). Women who underwent gravid radical hysterectomy had
significantly higher estimated blood loss than those who had a radical hysterectomy
in the postpartum period (2033 vs 425 mL, P = .0064), but operative characteristics
were otherwise similar. None of the pregnant women who died delayed treatment
due to pregnancy.
Introduction
Cancer diagnosis during pregnancy has risen over the last 50 years, now
complicating up to 1 in 1000 pregnancies. Some authors suggest that this may be
attributable to delay in childbearing to third or fourth decade of life. Cervical cancer
is the third most common gynecologic cancer in the United States, with >12,000
new cases of invasive cervical cancer diagnosed annually and approximately 4000
cervical cancer related deaths every year.
Cervical cancer is most frequently diagnosed at an early stage in both pregnant and
nonpregnant populations, and typically treated surgically with radical hysterectomy
plus bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. Approximately 1-3% of cases of cervical
cancer will be diagnosed in pregnant or peripartum women. However, the optimal
treatment for cervical cancer diagnosed in pregnancy is not always clear. Providers
must consider stage at the time of diagnosis, trimester of pregnancy, and patient
preferences regarding pregnancy outcome. We sought to describe the management
and subsequent outcomes of patients with cervical cancer diagnosed in pregnancy
compared to nonpregnant women with similar baseline characteristics.
This was a retrospective study of all patients diagnosed with cervical cancer in
pregnancy at Brigham and Womens Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital.
Patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision
codes and the Dana Farber and Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Registry.
These women were then matched 1:2 with contemporaneous nonpregnant patients
diagnosed within the same 5-year period. Patients were stage- and age-matched for
comparison.
Data were analyzed using software (Stata, Version 10.1; StataCorp LP, College
Station, TX). The X2 test was used for categorical data, while a 2-sided t-test was
used for continuous variables. A P value of <.05 was considered significant. This
study was approved by the Partners Health System Institutional Review Board.
Results
For the women who continued their pregnancies, there were no significant obstetric
complications, including cervical insufficiency, preterm labor, preterm premature
rupture of membranes, or fetal growth restriction. The mean GA at delivery was in
the late preterm period at 36.1 weeks (SD 5.1 weeks) with a mean birthweight of
2820 g, which is appropriate for this GA.12 Apgar scores for all neonates were 7 at
5 minutes. Three patients with known invasive cervical cancer had planned vaginal
deliveries without reported obstetric complications (Table 3); all of these patients
had microinvasive disease. An additional 7 patients had vaginal deliveries in the
setting of cervical cytology and biopsy findings suggestive of cancer during
pregnancy for which the definitive diagnostic procedure (conization or
hysterectomy) was deferred until the immediate postpartum period either because
the patient declined the procedure or because the managing physician opted to
delay.
There were 3 pregnant women who died of cervical cancer. One patient had a Pap
smear at 13 weeks gestation demonstrating squamous cell cancer. She was seen
for colposcopy 3 weeks after the initial Pap smear and had a biopsy that confirmed
invasive squamous cell carcinoma. She miscarried shortly after that appointment
and followed up with gynecologic oncology 1 month later (7 weeks after the initial
Pap smear). She was diagnosed with stage IVA cervical cancer at that time based on
physical exam and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) notable for vaginal extension,
bony metastases, and distant lung metastases. She had external beam pelvic
radiation with sensitizing cisplatin and zoledronic acid for bony metastases followed
by systemic chemotherapy. She demonstrated continued progression of pulmonary
metastases despite multiple lines of chemotherapy and surgical wedge resection.
The patient ultimately developed brain metastases and died 3 years after her
diagnosis.
The second patient was diagnosedwith stage IIB cervical cancer at 19 weeks GA
after cervical biopsy demonstrated invasive cancer and MRI demonstrated complete
replacement of the cervix by tumor with bilateral parametrial invasion. She
underwent fetal intracardiac potassium chloride injection followed by laparotomy
with hysterotomy for pregnancytermination prior to initiation of treatment. She was
treated with sensitizing cisplatin and concomitant external beam radiation along
with brachytherapy. The patient developed recurrent disease after 3 years,
diagnosed based on metastatic supraclavicular nodes and symptoms consistent
with a Pancoast tumor. The patient underwent multiple lines of treatment and died 5
years after her initial diagnosis.
The final pregnant patient who died due to cervical cancer was diagnosed with
stage IIB disease in the first trimester after colposcopic biopsies demonstrated
poorly differentiated adenosquamous carcinoma, with physical exam notable for left
parametrial and upper vaginal involvement. She underwent medical termination of
pregnancy followed by external beam pelvic radiation and concomitant
radiosensitizing cisplatin. Due to marked improvement noted on MRI, she also
underwent tandem and ovoid brachytherapy. She represented 1 year later with
worsening pain and was found to have recurrent disease with paraaortic metastasis.
The patient received palliative radiation and died 17 months after her initial
diagnosis.
Comment
There were 7 patients who did not undergo a definitive diagnostic procedure until
the immediate postpartum period despite cytology or biopsies during pregnancy
concerning for invasive cancer these 7 had reportedly uncomplicated vaginal births.
While we would not recommend a delay of diagnostic procedure when concern for
cancer has been raised, these patients were included in the analysis because based
on cytology and/or biopsy findings, cervical cancer was present during pregnancy.
The opportunity to review their obstetric and oncologic outcomes is both interesting
and potentially informative with regard to the impact of delay in treatment and the
option of vaginal delivery. The literature is mixed regarding the outcome of cervical
cancer after vaginal delivery.
Most pregnant women in our cohort who had a confirmed cancer diagnosis prior to
delivery underwent planned cesarean; planned vaginal delivery in the setting of
microinvasive disease or vaginal delivery in the absence of a confirmed diagnosis
was not associated with disease progression, obstetric complications, or decreased
survival in this small sample. However, in light of literature suggestive of increased
risk of local recurrence and potential for increased risk of distant metastasis, it is
reasonable to recommend elective cesarean delivery.
In terms of the timing of surgical management for women who chose to continue
pregnancy, a delay in management until the postpartum period did not significantly
impact survival, with 5-year survival rates similar to those available in large
population studies. While the pregnant patients had a significantly longer delay
from diagnosis to treatment, this did not seem to impact the overall oncologic
outcome. In this setting, it may be reasonable to consider delaying delivery until at
least 37 weeks gestation, if not 39 weeks, due to increasing pediatric literature
about the risks of late preterm and early term birth. Many current studies of cervical
cancer management in the context of pregnancy describe iatrogenic preterm birth
to expedite maternal oncologic treatment.
While Xia and colleagues noted decreased survival in patients who delayed
treatment of cervical cancer in a Chinese cohort, this patient group had a high
proportion of tumors >4 cm and aggressive histopathologic subtypes. This finding
has not been described by other groups. In terms of immediate postoperative
complications, as expected, the EBL was significantly higher with peripartum
hysterectomy, although there was no significant difference in transfusion. Based on
prior literature as well as our observations, it may be reasonable to consider delay
of definitive surgical management until the postpartum period, to minimize both
neonatal and maternal immediate complications without affecting longterm
outcome.
As expected, women who died were more likely to be of advanced stage at the time
of diagnosis, in both pregnant and nonpregnant cohorts. While there was a trend
toward decreased survival in the pregnant patients, none of these patients delayed
cancer treatment in the setting of pregnancyeall 3 patients underwent termination
or had a spontaneous loss. While no patients in our study received neoadjuvant
chemotherapy in the setting of advanced stage disease to allow fetal maturation,
this would be a potential therapeutic option and could be explored with the patient
and her oncologist depending on the clinical scenario.
Our study has limitations. This study is limited by its retrospective nature, which
may be affected by confounding and reporting bias. Additionally, because cervical
cancer in pregnancy is a relatively rare event, we are limited by small numbers. Due
to the nature and scope of this study, we were not able to collect and compare
specific neonatal outcomes, although these were universally favorable. In spite of
these limitations, the ability to compare age- and stagematched pregnant and
nonpregnant cervical cancer patients provides some insight into oncologic
outcomes based on pregnancy status. The matched design in a contemporary
cohort also corrects for potential changes in practice patterns over the time period
studied. We also compared timing of radical hysterectomy in the peripartum period,
which has been a point of discussion in the literature. In this study, we did not
demonstrate a significant impact on survival with a delay in surgery to the
postpartum period, although the treatment delay in our pregnancy cohort was
significantly longer than the nonpregnant patients.
Based on this series, tertiary and quaternary referral centers are likely to manage
approximately 1-2 cases of cervical cancer in pregnancy annually, many of which
will be referred after abnormal cervical cytology or biopsy results. Management
strategies among multidisciplinary teams remain variable, appropriately taking into
account the patients individual clinical characteristics and personal preferences
regarding pregnancy outcome and potential treatment delay. Results of this study
may be useful in counseling women facing the diagnosis of cervical cancer in
pregnancy. We continue to recommend a multidisciplinary approach with maternal
fetal medicine and gynecologic oncology to guide the counseling and treatment of
these patients.