Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
petitioner,
,
Principle:
collective
Test
LAND-AIR-SEA LABOR UNION (PLA) and COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
Principle:
Law Applicable:
In this case, no law was applied since thSLUith the correctness of the examiners
report -22970The , Rosario del Rosario, respondent.
of settling dispute instead of going directly to the courts. If they have availed first of
various modes of voluntary LMA) v. PHinvolved several issues but when it reached the
Supreme Court, the only issue left was the correctness of the reported money value
which they could have determined earlier if they resorted to an amicable settlement
to meet the demands of each other. bargaining UNIVERSITY
Test of its own books and in the computation of the money value of the questioned
awards. As a matter of fact, its only objection against the reports themselves was
that they were not correctly based, meaning that instead of the examination and
computation being based on the employees can easily be categorized into two general
classes:
Principle:
The suggested bias of the Labor Code in favor of the one company-one union policy,
anchored on the greater mutual benefits which the parties could derive, especially in
the case of employees whose bargaining strength could undeniably be enhanced by
their unity and solidarity but diminished by their disunity, division and dissension, is
not without exceptions.
The usual exception, of course, is where the employer unit has to give way to the
other units like the craft unit, plant unit, or a subdivision thereof; the recognition of
these exceptions takes into accountant the policy to assure employees of the fullest
freedom in exercising their rights. Otherwise stated, the one company-one union
policy must yield to the right of the employees to form unions or associations for
purposes not contrary to law, to self-organization and to enter into collective
bargaining negotiations, among others, which the Constitution guarantees