0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
16 vues2 pages
The bill aims to amend patent law by restoring the one-year grace period under the America Invents Act. This would prevent certain disclosures made within one year of filing a patent from being considered prior art. It allows inventors who disclose an innovation in a publication within the prior year of filing a patent claim to still be eligible for the patent. The bill is currently in hearings before the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
The bill aims to amend patent law by restoring the one-year grace period under the America Invents Act. This would prevent certain disclosures made within one year of filing a patent from being considered prior art. It allows inventors who disclose an innovation in a publication within the prior year of filing a patent claim to still be eligible for the patent. The bill is currently in hearings before the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
The bill aims to amend patent law by restoring the one-year grace period under the America Invents Act. This would prevent certain disclosures made within one year of filing a patent from being considered prior art. It allows inventors who disclose an innovation in a publication within the prior year of filing a patent claim to still be eligible for the patent. The bill is currently in hearings before the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
#700649087 INDM 5015 Legal Aspects of Industry Bill 2
Bill Title- Grace Period Restoration Act of 2015
Bill No-S.926 Status: Introduced-04/14/2015 Present status- Hearings held Summary: A bill to amend the patent law to promote basic research, to stimulate publication of scientific documents, Introduced on 04/14/2015 on the name of bill to encourage collaboration in scientific endeavors, to improve the transfer of technology to the private sector, and for other purposes. Supports government patent law to amend the one-year beauty period under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) that denies certain prerecording knowings made amid the year going before the compelling documenting date of a guaranteed innovation from being considered former workmanship that would make the case ineligible for a patent taking into account absence of oddity or evident topic grounds. A revelation that is former craftsmanship for the most part implies that a patent can't be issued for a guaranteed development in light of the fact that the creation was at that point protected, depicted in a printed distribution, out in the open use, discounted, accessible to the general population, or portrayed in an issued patent or a formerly recorded application. Restricts a creator's or some other individual's pre-recording revelation from excepting the patentability of specific cases taking into account absence of oddity or evident topic grounds if, before such divulgence and inside of the one-year period before the documenting date, the asserted development was at that point openly uncovered in a printed production by the innovator, a joint designer, or another who got the guaranteed innovation from the innovator or a joint innovator. It permits a creator who unveils an innovation in a printed distribution in such a way in the prior year documenting a patent case for the development to stay qualified for the patent, paying little heed to any resulting intention by outsiders. Rejects certain divulgences from being considered earlier workmanship under the reconsidered beauty period. Requires the revisions made by this Act to produce results as though established as a component of the AIA. As this bill has been on action for two times and is still under Hearing with the committee on small business and entrepreneurship.
Reference: The Library of Congress (2016).Bill Summary & Status. Retrieved from: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d114:SN00926:@@@D&summ2=m&