Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 7

Food Hydrocolloids 24 (2010) 619e625

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Food Hydrocolloids
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foodhyd

Effect of cross-linking on the physicochemical and physiological properties of


corn starch
Seung Hyun Koo, Kwang Yeon Lee, Hyeon Gyu Lee*
Department of Food and Nutrition, Hanyang University, 17 Haengdang-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 133-791, Republic of Korea

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Corn starch was chemically modied by cross-linking with STMP/STPP (99:1. w/w) and the physico-
Received 28 September 2009 chemical and physiological properties (in vitro and in vivo) of the cross-linked corn starch were inves-
Accepted 25 February 2010 tigated as a function of the degree of cross-linking. Cross-linking decreased the solubility, swelling factor,
and paste clarity of corn starch. While the swelling factor was highly correlated with the degree of cross-
Keywords: linking (R2 0.878), the X-ray diffraction patterns did not show any signicant alteration in the crys-
Cross-linked corn starch
tallinity of corn starch. It was shown by SEM measurement that a black zone was observed on the surface
Resistant starch
of crossed-linked starch granules, which did not occur with native starch. When mice were fed the diets
Physicochemical
Physiological
containing the corn starch with low (CLCS-5) and high (CLCS-12) degree of cross-linking (51.3 and 99.1%,
respectively), signicant effects on the nal body weight, weight gain as well as perirenal weight of the
mice (p < 0.05) were observed. Also, signicant decreases in total lipid, triglyceride, and total cholesterol
concentrations in serum were detected in CLCS-5 and CLCS-12 groups (p < 0.05). While total lipid level in
the liver decreased with increasing degree of cross-linking, the triglyceride level was not affected by the
supplementation with both of CLCS-5 and CLCS-12 corn starch samples.
2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction 2002). Among these methods, cross-linking has been commonly


used to modify native starch where various cross-linking agents
Starch, as a major reserve substance of plant sources, contrib- such as sodium trimetaphosphate (STMP), sodium tripolyphos-
utes to the appearance, structure and quality of food products phate (STPP), epichlorohydrin (EPI) and phosphoryl chloride (POCl3)
(Aparicio-Saguilan et al., 2005; Lawala & Adebowaleb, 2005). From have been used (Ratnayake & Jackson, 2008), being capable of
the nutritional point of view, it is classied into three major frac- forming either ether or ester inter-molecular linkages between
tions according to the timeline in the gastrointestinal tract which hydroxyl groups on starch molecules (Rutenberg & Solarek, 1984).
are rapidly digestible starch (RDS), slowly digestible starch (SDS), Also, the cross-linking of starch was reported to be affected by
and resistant starch (RS) (Englyst, Kingman, & Cummings, 1992). various factors which include starch source, cross-linking reagent
Out of them, resistant starch has been subdivided into four types: concentration and composition, the extent of substitution, pH,
physically inaccessible starch (RS1), granular starch (RS2), retro- reaction time, and temperature (Chung, Woo, & Lim, 2004; Lim &
graded or high amylose starch (RS3) and chemically modied Seib, 1993). In the food industry, starch modication with cross-
starch (RS4) (Xie, Liu, & Cui, 2006). In particular, it has been known linking is commonly used to provide stabilized granular structure
that the chemically modied starch inhibits the in vitro digestibility and restricted swelling (Ratnayake & Jackson, 2008) as well as
of starch (Hood & Anderson, 1976; Leegwater & Luten, 1971) and nutritionally benecial effects (Woo, 1999; Wurzburg, 1986). Thus,
also provides markedly changed physicochemical properties in most of the preceding studies have focused on the physicochemical
a number of foods (Song, He, Ruan, & Chen, 2006). and nutritional properties of cross-linked starches (Woo, 1999;
The chemical modication of starch can be achieved by a variety Wurzburg, 1986). However, little information exists regarding the
of different chemical reactions such as acid hydrolysis, oxidation, biological response (in vitro as well as in vivo) of cross-linked starch
etherication, esterication and cross-linking (Jayakody & Hoover, as a function of the degree of cross-linking.
In the present study, the objectives were to prepare for corn
starch with different degree of cross-linking, to investigate the
* Corresponding author. Tel: 82 2 2220 1202; fax: 82 2 2292 1226. effects of the degree of cross-linking on the physicochemical
E-mail address: hyeonlee@hanyang.ac.kr (H.G. Lee). properties and nutritional fractions (RDS, SDS and RS) of the corn

0268-005X/$ e see front matter 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.02.009
620 S.H. Koo et al. / Food Hydrocolloids 24 (2010) 619e625

starch, and nally to determine the comparative effects of cross- dextran solution (5 mg/mL) was added, and the contents were
linked corn starches with low and high cross-linking on the weight mixed well. After centrifugation at 3000  g for 10 min, the absor-
gain and lipid prole in mice. bance of the supernatant was read at 620 nm.

2. Materials and methods 2.6. Solubility

2.1. Materials Solubility was measured according to the method of Schoch


(1964). Starch sample (0.5 g, db) was heated with 40 mL of water
Corn starch, sodium trimetaphosphate (STMP), sodium tripoly- at desired temperatures (50e90  C) for 30 min. After centrifugation
phosphate (STPP), a-amylase (A-3176, Type VI: From porcine at 3000  g for 15 min, the supernatant was dried at 120  C for 2 h
pancreas) and porcine pancreatin (P-1750) were obtained from and the remnant was weighed. The solubility (%) was determined
SigmaeAldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Amyloglucosi- as the weight ratio of the dried supernatant to the dry starch.
dase (AMG 300 L, activity 300 AGU/mL) was obtained from Novo-
zymes (Bagsvaerd, Denmark). All other chemicals were analytical 2.7. In vitro digestibility
grade reagents.
The in vitro digestibility of cross-linked corn starch was deter-
2.2. Preparation of cross-linked corn starch mined according to the method of Englyst et al. (1992). Enzyme
solution was prepared as follows: Pancreatin (1 g) was added to
Cross-linked starches were prepared according to the method of 12 mL of distilled water, mixed for 10 min, and then centrifuged at
Woo and Seib (2002). Corn starch (50 g) was mixed with different 1500  g for 10 min. The supernatant (10 mL) and amyloglucosi-
amounts (5, 10, and 12% (w/w), based on dry weight of starch) of dase (0.2 mL) were transferred to a volumetric ask and the nal
a mixture of STMP/STPP (99/1% w/w) and dissolved in 70 mL water, volume was adjusted to 12 mL with distilled water. This enzyme
which were designated as CLCS-5, CLCS-10, and CLCS-12, respec- solution was freshly made for each digestibility test. Starch samples
tively. After the pH was adjusted to 11.0 with 0.1 N NaOH, the slurry (30 mg) and 0.75 mL of sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.2) was added
was kept at 45  C for 3 h in a shaking water bath. The suspensions into each micro tube (2 mL) which was placed in a shaking incu-
were neutralized to pH 6.0 with 0.1 N HCl, washed with distilled bator at 37  C for 10 min. The prepared enzyme solution (0.75 mL)
water four times, and dried at 40  C for 24 h in an oven. The dried was added to each tube which was incubated in the shaking
samples were then grounded in a mortar and sieved (100 mesh). incubator of 250 rpm for 20 min and then boiled for 10 min to stop
The starch subjected to the cross-linking condition without the reaction. Then, the glucose concentration in the supernatant
a mixture of STMP/STPP was used as a control in each experiment. was measured using dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method to calculate
the content of RDS (rapidly digestible starch). Also, the glucose
concentration after 120 min incubation was determined in the
2.3. Determination of the degree of cross-linking
same manner to obtain the content of SDS. Then, the content of RS
was calculated by differences (RS 100  RDS  SDS).
The degree of cross-linking of modied starches was deter-
mined from the viscosity values, according to the procedure of
2.8. X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurement
Kaur, Singh, and Singh (2006). The peak viscosity of modied starch
slurries (25% by weight) was measured from a controlled-stress
X-ray diffraction analysis was performed with an X-ray diffraction
rheometer equipped with a starch pasting cell. (AR1000, TA
image processor (D/Max-1200, Rigaku, Japan) (analysis parameters:
Instruments, New castle, DE, USA). A programmed heating and
50 kV and 90 mA, CuK radiation l 0.154 nm, nickel lter). The
cooling cycle to obtain the peak viscosity was employed as follows:
sample was scanned through the 2q range from 5 to 40 .
starch slurries were heated from 50 to 95  C at 11  C/min, and then
held at 95  C for 2 min. Afterwards the paste was cooled down to
2.9. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
50  C at 11  C/min and nally kept at 50  C for 2 min. The degree of
cross-linking was calculated by using the equation below:
The granular structure was observed using a scanning electron
Degree of cross  linking% A  B=A  100 microscope (SEM). Starch samples were placed in an oven at 40  C
for a few days for dehydration. The dehydrated samples were then
where A is the peak viscosity of the control sample (without STMP/ evenly distributed on SEM specimen stubs with double adhesive
STPP), and B is the peak viscosity of the cross-linked starch. tape and coated with a 10 nm gold layer. SEM analysis was con-
ducted using a JEOL-6330F scanning electron microscope (JEOL,
2.4. Paste clarity Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Representative micrographs were taken for each
sample at magnications of 200 (left) and 500 (right).
The paste clarity of native and modied starches was determined
according to the method of Reddy and Seib (1999). Starch (0.05 g, 2.10. Animal experiments
db) was suspended in distilled water (5 mL) in a glass-stoppered
tube and heated at 95  C for 30 min with shaking every 5 min. After Four-week old male mice (C57BL/6J) were purchased from
cooling, the starch clarity was measured on a spectrophotometer Central Lab. Animal Inc. (Seoul, Korea). After a weeks acclimatiza-
(Shimadzu model UV-160A) at 650 nm against water blank. tion period on standard rodent chow (Samyang, Seoul, Korea), the
animals were stratied by weight and assigned to one of the four
2.5. Swelling factor diets; a normal diet (ND, AIN-76A puried rodent diet 65% corn
starch #111753 (Dyets Inc., Bethlehem, PA, USA), a high-fat diet
The swelling factor was measured by the method of Tester and (HFD, 40% beef tallow modied AIN-76A puried rodent diet
Morrison (1990). A starch sample (100 mg) was suspended in #101556 (Dyets Inc., Bethlehem, PA, USA))), and two experimental
5 mL of distilled water and kept in a shaking water bath at 70  C for diets (high-fat diet contained with corn starched crossed-linked
30 min. The tubes were then cooled rapidly to 20  C, 0.5 mL of blue with 5% (CLCS-5) and 12% (CLCS-12) of STMP/STPP having the
S.H. Koo et al. / Food Hydrocolloids 24 (2010) 619e625 621

composition of 44% starch. 13% protein, and 3.97 kcal/g energy) Table 2
(Table 1). While the mice were housed in cages with wire-mesh Degree of cross-linking, paste clarity and swelling factor of native and cross-linked
corn starch prepared with different level of STMP/STPP.
bottoms in a conditioned room (23  C; relative humidity 55%), they
were provided with food and water ad libitum and maintained on Degree of cross-linking (%) Paste clarity (% T650) Swelling factor
each diet for a 6-week period. Food intakes were measured twice Control 0 30.15  1.34a 38.92
weekly and their body weights were recorded once a week. The CLCS-5 51.3 1.01  0.20b 33.51
CLCS-10 98.1 0.86  0.13b 20.25
care and treatment of mice were approved by the Hanyang
CLCS-12 99.1 0.86  0.13b 13.17
University Lab Animal Care Committee, which were in accordance
All values are means of triplicate determinations  standard deviation.
with the Korean Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

2.11. Serum collection and organ preparations determined to be 0, 51.3, 98.1, 99.1% (Table 2). There seemed to be
a proportionally increase in the degree of cross-linking with
After fasted for 24 h prior to being sacriced, the mice were increasing concentration of STMP/STPP up to 10%, which then
anesthetized with dry ice and dissected. Blood collected from the leveled off from 10 to 12%.
heart, was placed at room temperature for 2 h and then centrifuged The paste clarity at T650 of the control starch exhibited 30.15%
at 1500  g for 30 min at 4  C to obtain serum. The adipose tissue (Table 2). However, the use of STMP/STPP cross-linking reagent led
(perirenal and epididymal), liver, kidney and epididymis were to a substantial decrease in the paste clarity. Corn starch crossed-
excised from each mouse and the wet weights were measured. The linked with 5% STMP/STPP showed 1.01% past clarity and the other
separated serum and organs were then snap frozen in liquid samples exhibited 0.86% paste clarity. There was not however
nitrogen and stored at 70  C for further analysis. signicant differences among the cross-linked samples (p > 0.05).
These results were consistent with the reports by Lim et al. (1993)
2.12. Lipid prole and Kaur et al. (2006) also found that cross-linked starches showed
lower pastes clarity than their counterpart native starches. The
Serum lipid proles (total lipid, triglyceride, total cholesterol) signicant decrease in the paste clarity was possibly attributed to
were measured by blood chemistry analyzer (Olympus AU 400, a change in the starch granular structure by cross-linking
Japan). Total lipids from the livers were extracted with chloroform: (Morikawa & Nishinari, 2000a). That is, compared to native starch,
methanol (2:1, v/v) by a modied method of Folch, Lees, and the structure of cross-linked starches seemed to be almost intact
Stanley (1956). Liver total cholesterol and triglyceride contents after heating at 95  C, resulting in the decreased paste clarity (Kaur
were assayed by enzymatic colorimetric procedures using et al., 2006; Morikawa & Nishinari, 2000b). Furthermore, it has
a commercial kit (Asan Pharmaceutical Co., Seoul, Korea). been suggested that the reduced swelling of cross-linked starches
might be partly responsible for their reduced paste clarity (Kaur
2.13. Statistical analysis et al., 2006; Reddy & Seib, 2000).
The swelling factor measured at 70  C decreased signicantly
All experiments were performed in triplicate and Statistical with increasing level of the cross-linking reagent (Table 2). This
Package for the Social Science (SPSS, Version 12.0, 2004, SPSS Inc., result was in agreement with the nding of Mirmoghtadaie,
Chicago, IL, USA) was used to statistically analyze the results. The Kadivar, and Shahedi (2009) who reported the reduced swelling
results were expressed as the mean  SD and one-way analysis of factor of cross-linked oat starch with increasing degree of cross-
variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncans multiple comparison test linking. Regression analysis exhibited that the swelling factor was
was performed. linearly related to the concentration of cross-linking reagent used
(R2 0.878). It is well known that cross-linking strengths the
3. Results and discussion bonding between starch chains, thus allowing them to resist
against swelling. Therefore, the reduced swelling factor would be
3.1. Degree of cross-linking, paste clarity and swelling factor related to the formation of inter-molecular bridges by phosphorous
residual after cross-linking reaction (Chung et al., 2004; Janzen,
The degree of cross-linking of corn starches which were modi- 1969; Woo, 1999; Wurzburg, 1986).
ed by different amounts of STMP/STPP (0, 5, 10, and 12%) was

Table 1 50
Composition of experimental diets (g/kg diets).

Ingredient ND Experimental groupsa


40
HFD CLCS-5 CLCS-12
Casein 200 200 200 200
0%
Solubility (%)

DL-methionine 3 3 3 3 30 5%
Corn starch 650 150 e e
Sucrose 0 150 150 150 10%
CLCS-5 e e 150 e 20 12%
CLCS-12 e e e 150
Corn oil 50 e e e
Beef tallow e 400 400 400 10
Cellulose 50 50 50 50
Mineral Mix S10022G 35 35 35 35
Vitamin Mix V10037 10 10 10 10 0
Choline bitartrate 2 2 2 2
50C 60C 70C 80C 90C
Total calories (kcal/kg) 3592 5542 5542 5542
Total (g/kg) 1000 1000 1000 1000
Temperature (C)
a
ND, Normal diet; HFD, High-fat diet; CLCS, High fat diet containing with cross- Fig. 1. Solubility of native and cross-linked corn starch prepared with different levels
linked corn starch with different degree of cross-linking. of cross-linking with the mixture STMP/STPP.
622 S.H. Koo et al. / Food Hydrocolloids 24 (2010) 619e625

Table 3 3.3. Fraction of RDS, SDS and RS


RDS, SDS, and RS contents derived from native and cross-linked corn starch
prepared with different level of STMP/STPP.
RDS content (58.05% / 28.63%) and SDS content (36.46% /
Starch fraction (%) 12.69%) signicantly decreased, but the RS content (5.50% /
RDS SDS RS 58.68%) increased with increasing concentration of cross-linking
Control 58.05  3.6a 36.46  7.07a 5.50  4.55c reagent (Table 3). It is well known that the contents of starch
CLCS-5 49.05  5.46a 33.96  2.37a 16.98  3.10b fractions (RDS, SDS and RS) can be affected by various factors such
CLCS-10 33.51  8.03b 16.17  4.77b 50.31  4.86a as amylose content, swelling power, granule surface area and starch
CLCS-12 28.63  8.2b 12.69  2.37b 58.68  6.87a
crystalline structure (Shin, Kim, Ha, Lee, & Moon, 2005, Spence &
Jane, 1999). Specially, when they were plotted against the
swelling factor, a highly positive correlation was observed for RDS
(R2 0.983) and SDS (R2 0.972). Since the swelling of starch
3.2. Water solubility
granule is likely to enhance the access of digestive enzymes to its
inner structure, it appeared that the cross-linked starch with lower
When the solubility of native and cross-linked corn starches was
swelling factor (Fig. 2) was less degraded by the attack of the
measured as a function of temperature (50e90  C) (Fig. 1), there was
digestive enzymes, giving rise to a decrease in RDS and SDS
an overall tendency that the solubility decreased with increasing
contents. However, RS content was inversely related to the swelling
degree of cross-linking at all temperatures tested. A similar pattern
factor (R2 0.920) since the restricted swelling by cross-links can
was reported by Kaur et al. (2006) for potato starches modied
reduce enzymatic hydrolysis. These results were conrmed by
with EPI and POCl3 at different concentrations. It suggested that
previous studies (Chung, Shin, & Lim, 2008; Chung et al., 2004; Han
decreased solubility by cross-linking would be possibly due to
& Bemiller, 2007; Shin et al., 2005; Woo, 1999).
increased density of cross-links in the starch structure which
seemed to cause less disintegration of starch granules during gela-
tinization (Jyothi, Moorthy, & Rajasekharan, 2006). 3.4. XRD

The X-ray diffraction patterns of native and cross-linked


starches are shown in Fig. 3. There was no pronounced difference
between the native and modied starches. That is, the native and
70
modied starches showed similar diffraction patterns with peaks
60 y = 1.142x + 12.07
R = 0.983 at 15.02, 17.18 and 23.73 (2q), which are typical characteristics of
50 A-type starch (Zobel, 1988). This result suggested that cross-link-
RDS (%)

40 ing with STMP/STPP up to 12% did not dramatically alter the


30 crystalline pattern of corn starch. This observation was in agree-
ment with the nding of Hoover and Sosulski (1986), who reported
20
that cross-linking mainly took place in the amorphous regions of
10 starch granule and did not change the crystalline patterns of
0 starches.
10 20 30 40
Swlling factor (SF)
3.5. SEM
50
y = 1.009x - 1.904
R = 0.972
The scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of native and cross-
40 linked corn starches are shown in Fig. 4. SEM investigation showed
SDS (%)

30

20

10

0
10 20 30 40
Swlling factor (SF)

70
60 y = -1.856x + 76.99
R = 0.920
50
40
RS (%)

30
20
10
0
10 20 30 40
Swlling factor (SF)

Fig. 2. Linear regression of swelling factor and starch fraction (RDS, SDS and RS) of Fig. 3. X-ray diffraction patterns (XRD) of native and cross-linked corn starch prepared
cross-linked corn starch prepared with different levels of cross-linking with the with different levels of cross-linking with the mixture STMP/STPP. (A) Native, (B) CLCS-
mixture STMP/STPP. 5, (C) CLCS-10, (D) CLCS-12.
S.H. Koo et al. / Food Hydrocolloids 24 (2010) 619e625 623

Fig. 4. Scanning electron microphotograph (SEM) of native and cross-linked corn starch prepared with different levels of cross-linking with the mixture STMP/STPP. (A) Native, (B)
CLCS-5, (C) CLCS-10, (D) CLCS-12. (Right: 200; Left: 500, bar 10 mm)

that the cross-linking caused slight changes in the structure of 3.6. Animal studies
starch granules compared with native starch. Native starch gran-
ules (Fig. 4A) were polygonal in shape with well-dened edges, 3.6.1. Body weight, food intake, tissue and fat pads weight
whereas cross-linked starch granules (Fig. 4B-D) exhibited The body weight, food intake, tissue and fat pads weight in
a slightly rough surface and black zone on the surface. These results mice fed different diets are shown in Table 4. At the beginning of
were consistent with the reports by Carmona-Garcia, Sanchez- the study, the mice fed normal diet (ND) had less initial weight
Rivera, Mndez-Montealvo, Garza-Montoya, and Bello-Prez than the other groups which were fed the high-fat diet while there
(2009) who found that cross-linked banana starch with STMP/ was no signicant difference in body weight among the three
STPP showed black zones on the surface along the longitudinal axis. groups. However, the addition of the CLCS-5 and CLCS-12 to the
Singh, Kaur, and McCarthy (2007) suggested that the black zones high-fat diet (HFD) had signicant (p < 0.05) effects on the mice
seemed to indicate a slight fragmentation and the formation of nal body weight which was signicantly (p < 0.05) reduced
a deep groove in the starch granules. compared to the HFD group. However, no signicant difference
624 S.H. Koo et al. / Food Hydrocolloids 24 (2010) 619e625

Table 4
Body weight, food intake, tissue and fat pads weight of C57BL/6J mice fed high-fat diet after 6 weeks of treatment with experimental diets.

ND HFD CLCS-5 CLCS-12


Initial weight, g 24.00  0.69b 32.03  1.73a 30.00  1.94a 29.50  3.78a
Final weight, g 26.52  0.41c 38.64  1.79a 34.08  1.02b 33.61  1.99b
Weight gain, % 7.11  2.82b 20.67  0.93a 7.42  3.11b 9.47  1.96b

Food intake, g/day 109.10  7.49a 94.40  0.28ab 78.90  1.27b 98.70  21.35ab
Food efciency, g gain/g food 0.016  0.001c 0.094  0.000a 0.084  0.001ab 0.071  0.015b

Tissue weight
Liver, g 0.97  0.04c 1.58  0.27a 1.24  0.18b 1.32  0.34b
Kidney, g 0.32  0.03b 0.34  0.02ab 0.34  0.02ab 0.34  0.03a
Epididymis, g 0.24  0.09ns 0.21  0.01ns 0.19  0.06ns 0.20  0.04ns

Fat pad weight


Perirenal fat, g 0.11  0.06c 0.29  0.08a 0.26  0.08a 0.19  0.07b
Epididymis, g 0.48  0.12b 2.06  0.35a 1.82  0.40a 1.71  0.53a

Initial weight: mean body weight at beginning the experimental diets.


Weight gain (%) [(Final weight (g) - initial weight (g))/initial weight (g)]  100.
Energy intake (kcal) mean food consumption (g)  dietary metabolize energy (kcal).
Food efciency mean body weight gain (g)/mean food intake (g).
a-c
Values with different subscripts within the same column are signicantly different among samples at a 0.05 level by Duncans multiple range test.

was detectable between CLCS-5 and -12 groups. Gain weights 3.6.2. Lipidic parameters in serum and liver
were 20.67  0.93%, 7.42  3.11% and 9.47  1.96% for mice fed The changes of plasma and liver lipids concentration are shown
HFD, CLCS-5 and -12 groups, respectively. In addition, a 64.10% and Table 5. The serum total lipid value was signicantly lower in the
54.18% reduction in the body weight was observed in the CLCS-5 mice fed CLCS-5 (303.50  22.20 mg/dL) and CLCS-12
and -12 groups, respectively, compared with the HFD group (294.45  17.65 mg/dL) diets than those fed the HFD diet
(p < 0.05) at the end of the trial. This result was favorably (337.81  8.19 mg/dL) (p < 0.05). A signicant decrease in serum
compared with the study of Jeong, Kim, Kang, and Kim (2002) triglyceride was observed in CLCS-12 groups compared to other
where the diets containing resistant starch caused a reduced groups (p < 0.05). Serum total lipid and triglyceride level appeared
weight gain by 7%. It would be explained by the fact that resistant to decrease with increasing degree of cross-linking. However, the
starch decrease energy absorption, thus giving rise to a decrease in differences between CLCS-5 and CLCS-1v2 were not signicant. The
epididymal fat pads and serum triacylglycerol concentration (de diets containing resistant starch are shown to reduce weight gain as
Deckere, Kloots, & van Amelsvroot, 1995). However, Bjorck, well as level of blood lipid in previous studies (Kim, Chung, Kang,
Gunnarsson, and Ostergard (1989) reported no signicant effect Kim, & Park, 2003; Martinez-Flores, Chang, Martinez-Bustos,
of the diets containing cross-linked and acetylated corn and rice & Sgarbieri, 2004; Ranhotra et al. 1996), which are thus favorably
starches on body weight loss in normal and diabetic rats. Food compared with our results. Serum total cholesterol levels were
intake was lower from the mice on the CLCS-5 diet, compared lower by 8.3% and 5.7% in the mice fed CLCS-5 and CLCS-12, as
with the other groups, even though there were no signicant compared to the group fed HFD. Moreover, the mice fed the diets
differences. Greater food efciency was observed greater from the containing cross-linked corn starch exhibited lower level of LDL-
mice on the HFD (0.094  0.000), CLCS-5 (0.084  0.001) and cholesterol than the HFD group while no signicant difference in
CLCS-12 (0.071  0.015) diets, as compared to mice fed the normal the HDL-cholesterol concentration was observed. In addition, the
diet (0.016  0.001). All the groups fed the high-fat diet exhibited level of HDL-cholesterol was higher in the groups fed the HFD diets
higher liver weight than ND. Specically, the liver weight of the while the ND group exhibited the lowest value (p < 0.05). Ranhotra
HFD group was greater by 63% than that of the ND group. Less liver et al. (1996) reported that the reduction of total cholesterol by RS
weight was observed in the CLCS groups than HFD where no was derived from a decrease in both levels of HDL- and LDL-
signicant differences in kidney and epididymis weights were cholesterol. Thus, it might suggest that the increased level of total
detected among the groups (p < 0.05). Previous studies (Cheng & serum cholesterol in the groups fed the high fat diet appeared to
Lai, 2000; Ebihara, Shiraishi, & Okuma, 1998; Ranhotra, Gelroth, raise both levels of both LDL and HDL.
& Glaser, 1996) showed that the diet containing resistant starch Total liver lipid values were signicantly lower in mice fed
reduced the organ weight such as liver. Hence, these results would the CLCS-5 (79.47  19.72 mg/g) and CLCS-12 (80.60  8.81 mg/g)
result possibly from the inclusion of CLCS in the diets which than those fed HFD (241.50  15.65 mg/g) (p < 0.05). The supple-
belongs to resistant starch, mentation with cross-linked corn starch seemed to cause more

Table 5
Lipidic parameter in serum and liver of C57BL/6J mice fed high-fat diet after 6 weeks of treatment with experimental diets.

ND HFD CLCS-5 CLCS-12


Serum
Total lipid, mg/dL 333.01  12.78a 337.81  8.19a 303.50  22.20b 294.45  17.65b
Triglyceride, mg/dL 149.23  9.66a 98.89  4.63b 86.76  11.44bc 80.13  8.20c
Tota cholesterol, mg/dL 121.94  5.53c 155.38  4.43a 142.56  10.06b 146.55  9.26ab
HDL-cholesterol, mg/dL 76.30  4.21b 97.20  2.25a 89.50  4.28a 91.90  5.88a
LDL-cholesterol, mg/dL 45.64  1.64c 58.18  2.25a 53.06  6.12b 54.65  4.63b

Liver
Total lipid, mg/g liver 114.13  7.29b 241.50  15.65a 79.47  19.72b 80.60  8.81b
Triglyceride, mg/g liver 19.22  2.44b 28.14  2.37a 32.28  3.41ab 30.51  3.54a
Tota cholesterol, mg/g liver 1.16  0.36a 1.07  0.43a 1.08  0.41ab 0.73  0.31b
aec
Values with different subscripts within the same raw are signicantly different among samples at a 0.05 level by Duncans multiple range test.
S.H. Koo et al. / Food Hydrocolloids 24 (2010) 619e625 625

excretion of triglyceride in the liver even though a statistical Kim, W. K., Chung, M. K., Kang, N. E., Kim, M. H., & Park, O. J. (2003). Effect of
resistant starch from corn or rice on glucose control, colonic events, and blood
difference was not observed. Also, a signicant decrease (p < 0.05)
lipid concentrations in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Journal of Nutri-
in liver total cholesterol occurred in the mice fed CLCS-12 diet. tional Biochemistry, 14, 166e172.
Lawala, O. S., & Adebowaleb, K. O. (2005). Physicochemical characteristics and
Acknowledgement thermal properties of chemically modied jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis)
starch. Carbohydrate Polymers, 60, 331e341.
Leegwater, D. C., & Luten, J. B. (1971). A study on the in vitro digestibility of
This work was supported by the Academic Research & Devel- hydroxypropyl starches by pancreatin. Starch/Strke, 23, 430e432.
opment Program funded by the Youlchon Foundation. Lim, S.-T., & Seib, P. A. (1993). Location of phosphate esters in a wheat starch
phosphate by 31P-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Cereal Chemistry,
70, 145e152.
References Martinez-Flores, H. E., Chang, Y. K., Martinez-Bustos, F., & Sgarbieri, V. (2004). Effect
of high ber products on blood lipids and lipoproteins in hamsters. Nutrition
Aparicio-Saguilan, A., Flores-Huicochea, E., Tovar, J., Garcia-Suarez, F., Gutierrez- Research, 24, 85e93.
Meraz, F., & Bello-Perez, L. A. (2005). Resistant starch-rich powders prepared by Mirmoghtadaie, L., Kadivar, M., & Shahedi, M. (2009). Effects of cross-linking and
autoclaving of native and lintnerized banana starch: partial characterization. acetylation on oat starch properties. Food Chemistry, 116, 709e713.
Starch/Strke, 57, 405e412. Morikawa, K., & Nishinari, K. (2000a). Effects of concentration dependence of
Bjorck, I., Gunnarsson, A., & Ostergard, K. (1989). A study of native and chemically retrogradation behaviour of dispersions for native and chemically modied
modied potato starch. Part II: digestibility in the rat intestinal tract. Starch/ potato starch. Food Hydrocolloids, 14, 395e401.
Strke, 41, 128e134. Morikawa, K., & Nishinari, K. (2000b). Rheological and DSC studies of gelatinization
Carmona-Garcia, R., Sanchez-Rivera, M. M., Mndez-Montealvo, G., Garza- of chemically modied starch heated at various temperatures. Carbohydrate
Montoya, B., & Bello-Prez, L. A. (2009). Effect of the cross-linked reagent type Polymers, 43, 241e247.
on some morphological, physicochemical and functional characteristics of Ranhotra, G. S., Gelroth, J. A., & Glaser, B. K. (1996). Effect of resistant starch on blood
banana starch (Musa paradisiaca). Carbohydrate Polymers, 76, 117e122. and liver lipids in hamsters. Cereal Chemistry, 73(2), 176e178.
Cheng, H.-H., & Lai, M.-H. (2000). Fermentation of resistant rice starch produces Ratnayake, W. S., & Jackson, D. S. (2008). Phase transition of cross-linked and
propionate reducing serum and hepatic cholesterol in rats. Journal of Nutrition, hydroxypropylated corn (Zea mays L.) starches. LWT, 41, 346e358.
130, 1991e1995. Reddy, I., & Seib, P. A. (1999). Paste properties of modied starches from partial
Chung, H.-J., Shin, D.-H., & Lim, S.-T. (2008). In vitro starch digestibility and esti- waxy wheats. Cereal Chemistry, 76, 341e349.
mated glycemic index of chemically modied corn starches. Food Research Reddy, I., & Seib, P. A. (2000). Modied waxy wheat starch compared to modied
International, 41, 579e585. waxy corn starch. Journal of Cereal Science, 31, 25e39.
Chung, H.-J., Woo, K.-S., & Lim, S.-T. (2004). Glass transition and enthalpy relax- Rutenberg, M. W., & Solarek, D. (1984). Starch derivatives: production and uses. In
ation of cross-linked corn starches. Carbohydrate Polymers, 55, 9e15. R. L. Whistler (Ed.), Starch: Chemistry and technology (pp. 312e388). New York:
de Deckere, E. A. M., Kloots, W. J., & van Amelsvroot, J. M. (1995). Both raw and Academic Press.
retrograded starch decrease serum triglycerol concentration and fat accretion Schoch, T. J. (1964). Swelling power and solubility of starch granules. In
in the rat. British Journal of Nutrition, 73, 287e298. R. L. Whistler (Ed.), Methods in carbohydrate chemistry, vol. 4 (pp. 106e108).
Ebihara, K., Shiraishi, R., & Okuma, K. (1998). Hydroxypropyl-modied potato starch Orlando, Florida: Academic Press.
increases fecal bile acid excretion in rats. Journal of Nutrition, 128, 848e854. Shin, S. I., Kim, H. J., Ha, H. J., Lee, S. H., & Moon, T. H. (2005). Effect of hydrothermal
Englyst, H. N., Kingman, S. M., & Cummings, J. H. (1992). Classication and treatment on formation and structural characteristics of slowly digestible non-
measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. European Journal of pasted granular sweet potato starch. Starch/Strke, 57, 421e430.
Clinical Nutrition, 46, S33eS50. Singh, J., Kaur, L., & McCarthy, O. J. (2007). Factors inuencing the physico-chemical,
Folch, J., Lees, M., & Stanley, G. H. S. (1956). A simple method for the isolation and morphological, thermal and rheological properties of some chemically modied
purication of total lipids from animal tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry, starches for food applicationsda review. Food Hydrocolloids, 21, 1e22.
226, 497e509. Song, X., He, G., Ruan, H., & Chen, G. (2006). Preparation and properties of
Han, J. A., & BeMiller, J. N. (2007). Preparation and physical characteristics of slowly octenyl succinic anhydride modied early Indica rice starch. Starch/Strke, 58,
digesting modied food starches. Carbohydrate Polymers, 67, 366e374. 109e117.
Hood, L. F., & Anderson, V. G. (1976). In vitro digestibility of hydroxypropyl distarch Spence, K. E., & Jane, J. (1999). Chemical and physical properties of ginko (Ginko
phosphate and unmodied tapioca starch. Cereal Chemistry, 53, 282e290. biloba) starch. Carbohydrate polymers, 67, 261e269.
Hoover, R., & Sosulski, F. (1986). Effect of cross-linking on functional properties of Tester, R. F., & Morrison, W. R. (1990). Swelling and gelatinization of cereal
legume starches. Starch/Strke, 38, 149e155. starches I. Effects of amylopectin, amylose, and lipids. Cereal Chemistry, 67,
Janzen, G. L. (1969). Digestibility of starches and phosphatized starches by means of 551e557.
pancreatin. Starch/Strke, 38, 231e237. Woo, K. -S. (1999). Cross-linked, RS4 type resistant starch: preparation and properties.
Jayakody, L., & Hoover, R. (2002). The effect of linterization on cereal starch gran- PhD thesis. Kansas State: University Manhattan, KS.
ules. Food Research International, 35, 665e680. Woo, K.-S., & Seib, P. A. (2002). Cross-linked resistant starch: preparation and
Jeong, K. K., Kim, M. H., Kang, N. E., & Kim, W. K. (2002). Effects of resistant starch on properties. Cereal Chemistry, 79, 819e825.
gut functions and plasma lipid proles in rats fed high fat diet. Journal of Korean Wurzburg, O. B. (1986). Cross-linked starches. In O. B. Wurzburg (Ed.), Modied
Society of Food Science and Nutrition, 31(2), 271e276. starches: Properties and uses (pp. 41e53). Florida, USA: CRC Press.
Jyothi, A. N., Moorthy, S. N., & Rajasekharan, V. (2006). Effects of cross linking with Xie, X. J., Liu, Q., & Cui, S. W. (2006). Studies on the granular structure of resistant
epichlorohydrin on the properties of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) starch. starches (type 4) from normal, high amylose and waxy corn starch citrates. Food
Starch/Strke, 58, 292e299. Research International, 39, 332e341.
Kaur, L., Singh, J., & Singh, N. (2006). Effects of cross-linking on some properties of Zobel, H. F. (1988). Molecules to granules: a comprehensive starch review. Starch/
potato starches. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 86, 1945e1954. Strke, 40, 44e55.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi