apunte de teoria cuantica de campos

© All Rights Reserved

51 vues

apunte de teoria cuantica de campos

© All Rights Reserved

- Mock 1 - Verbal
- Fields and Waves in Communication Electronics PDF Download
- Signatures of God
- Albert Einstein
- Teleportation
- Maxwell Theory Freeman DEGP aasdfasdfsdflajdf;asdjf;jsdjf;sdjlfj;sdjwopuqweouroewjafklsdj;l jcSelected Physical ConstantsEGP aasdfasdfsdflajdf;asdjf;jsdjf;sdjlfj;sdjwopuqweouroewjafklsdj;l jcSelected Physical ConstantsEGP aasdfasdfsdflajdf;asdjf;jsdjf;sdjlfj;sdjwopuqweouroewjafklsdj;l jcSelected Physical ConstantsEGP aasdfasdfsdflajdf;asdjf;jsdjf;sdjlfj;sdjwopuqweouroewjafklsdj;l jcSelected Physical ConstantsEGP aasdfasdfsdflajdf;asdjf;jsdjf;sdjlfj;sdjwopuqweouroewjafklsdj;l jcSelected Physical ConstantsEGP aasdfasdfsdflajdf;asdjf;jsdjf;sdjlfj;sdjwopuqweouroewjafklsdj;l jcSelected Physical ConstantsEGP aasdfasdfsdflajdf;asdjf;jsdjf;sdjlfj;sdjwopuqweouroewjafklsdj;l jcSelected Physical ConstantsEGP aasdfasdfsdflajdf;asdjf;jsdjf;sdjlfj;sdjwopuqweouroewjafklsdj;l jcSelected Physical ConstantsEGP aasdfasdfsdflajdf;asdjf;jsdjf;sdjlfj;sdjwopuqweouroewjafklsdj;l jcSelected Physical ConstantsEGP aasdfasdfsdflajdf;asdjf;jsdjf;sdjlfj;sdjwopuqweouroewjafklsdj;l jcSelected Physical ConstantsEGP aa
- Term Paper
- MSc Physics Syllabus
- The Electromagnetic Gauge Field Interpolation Between the Instant Forma Nd the Front Form of the Hamiltonian Dynamics
- Superfluidity
- hw4_sols
- Noncom 1
- Quantum gravity is a result of U(1) repulsive dark energy
- L9
- Carlos Calvet- The Background Field Theory (Virtual Particles and Fields of Force)
- Hudpath(1)
- Constantino Tsallis -- Nonextensive Physics- A Possible Connection Between Generalized Statistical Mechanics and Quantum Gro
- q Computing
- Schrödinger's equation — what is it_ _ plus.maths
- Lecture 03

Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 18

Why quantum field theory? We know quantum mechanics works perfectly

well for many systems we had looked at already. Then why go to a new

formalism? The following few sections describe motivation for the quantum

field theory, which I introduce as a re-formulation of multi-body quantum

mechanics with identical physics content, yet applicable to wider varieties of

systems than the conventional formulation of quantum mechanics.

odinger Wave Func-

tion

We used totally anti-symmetrized Slater determinants for the study of atoms,

molecules, nuclei. Already with the number of particles in these systems,

say, about 100, the use of multi-body wave function is quite cumbersome.

Mention a wave function of an Avogardro number of particles! Not only

it is completely impractical to talk about a wave function with 6 1023

coordinates for each particle, we even do not know if it is supposed to have

6 1023 or 6 1023 + 1 coordinates, and the property of the system of our

interest shouldnt be concerned with such a tiny (?) difference.

Another limitation of the multi-body wave functions is that it is incapable

of describing processes where the number of particles changes. For instance,

think about the emission of a photon from the excited state of an atom.

The wave function would contain coordinates for the electrons in the atom

and the nucleus in the initial state. The final state contains yet another

particle, photon in this case. But the Schrodinger equation is a differential

equation acting on the arguments of the Schrodinger wave function, and

can never change the number of arguments. Similarly, it is useful to consider

elementary excitations in multi-body systems, such as phonons, and they can

be created or annihilated by putting energy into the system. Finally even the

number of matter particles changes in relativistic elementary paticle physics

by pair creations, pair annihilations etc.

The limitaions of multi-body Schrodinger wave function mentioned here

1

call for a better formalism. The quantum field theory is designed specifically

for that.

Quantum Field Theory is sometimes called 2nd quantization. This is a very

bad misnomer because of the reason I will explain later. But nonetheless,

you are likely to come across this name, and you need to know it.

The aim of the quantum field theory is to come up with a formalism which

is completely equivalent to multi-body Schrodinger equations but just better:

it allows you to consider a variable number of particles all within the same

framework and can even describe the change in the number of particles. It

also gives totally symmetric or anti-symmetric multi-body wave function au-

tomatically, not as a consequence of symmetrization or anti-symmetrization

done by hand. Moreover, once we go to relativistic systems, quantum field

theory is the only known formalism to describe quantum mechanics consis-

tent with Lorentz invariance and causality. It also allows a systematic way of

organizing perturbation theory in terms of Feynman diagrams, a graphical

representation of each term in perturbation theory.

Even though the contents of multi-body quantum mechanics and quantum

field theory are exactly the same in systems where the number of particles

does not change, it turns out that the field theory is a far better formalism for

many purposes and is widely used in condensed matter physics, elementary

particle physics, quantum optics, and in some cases also in atomic/molecular

physics and nuclear physics. It is particularly suited to multi-body problems.

In systems where the number of particles changes, or where one needs super-

position of states with different number of particles (sounds odd, but we will

see examples later), quantum field theory is crucial.

But it is clear that the formalism will confuse you (at least) once be-

cause of too-close resemblance but conceptual difference from the ordinary

Schrodinger equation. I will try to make it as clear as possible below.

It is interesting to note that the way quantum mechanics and quantum field

theory work is a sort of the opposite. In quantum mechanics, you start with

classical particle Hamiltonian mechanics, with no concept of wave or interfer-

ence. After quantizing it, we introduce Schrodinger wave function and there

2

emerges concepts of wave and its interference. In quantum field theory, you

start with classical wave equation, with no concept of particle. After quan-

tizing it, we find particle interpretation of excitations in the system. Either

way, we find particle-wave duality, i.e., the energy/momentum is carried by

a quantum object which is neither exactly a wave or a particle. It is both.

Nonetheless, two formalisms start from the opposite classical description and

arrive at the same conclusion.

2 Classical Schr

odinger Field

Let us consider a classical field equation

2

!

h

h +

i (~x, t) = 0. (1)

t 2m

This looks just like quantum mechanical Schrodinger equation, but we con-

sider it as a classical field equation similar to the Maxwell equation in Elec-

tromagnetism. You may wonder why there is h in the equation, then. I

can actually eliminate h completely from the equation by introducing a new

parameter = m/ h. For a later convenience when we discuss the action of

the classical Schrodinger field, let me also introduce = h 1/2 . Then the

field equation is !

i + (~x, t) = 0. (2)

t 2

There is no trace of h any more. Of course, the parameter has a dimension

2

of L T and does not have a meaning as a mass of a particle. But we are

talking about a classical field equation, and there is no concept of a mass in

a classical field equation anyway. is just a parameter in the field equation.

A solution to this field equation is that of a plane wave

~

(~x, t) = eik~xit , (3)

where the angular frequency and the wave vector ~k are related as

~k 2

= . (4)

2

You can see that the parameter defines the dispersion relation between the

frequency and the wave vector.

3

This classical field equation can be derived from the action

!

Z

S= dtd~x (~x, t) i + (~x, t). (5)

t 2

Note that the Lagrangian for a field is given by an integral over space, and

in this case Z Z

S = dtL(t) = dtd~x L(~x, t) (6)

action with respect to + , we find

!

Z

S = dtd~x (~x, t) i + (~x, t), (7)

t 2

and requiring that the action must be stationary, we recover the field equation

Eq. (2). You may worry that the action Eq. (5) is not real; but it can be

made real by adding surface terms

!

Z

i 1 ~ ~

S= dtd~x ( ) . (8)

2 2

But for simplicity we use the previous form Eq. (5) for the rest of the note.

Because the classical field theory does not need to be linear unlike quan-

tum mechanical Schrodinger equation, we can add a non-linear term (higher

than quadratic term) in the action, for instance,

!

Z

1

S= d~xdt i +

2 2 .

(9)

2 2

we find a non-linear field equation

!

i + (~x, t) = 0. (10)

t 2

general any more.

4

3 Quick Review of Quantization Procedure

Let us briefly review how we quantize a particle mechanics system. Given

an action on the phase space (pi , qi ),

Z Z X

S= dt L = dt ( pi qi H(pi , qj )), (11)

i

S H

= qi = 0, (12)

pi pi

S H

= pi = 0. (13)

qi qi

You can again add a surface term and make it look symmetric between p

and q as L = i 21 (pi qi qi pi ) H(p, q). To quantize this system, we first

P

L

pi = . (14)

qi

Then we set up the canonical commutation relation

hij . (15)

This defines the quantum theory. The index i runs over all degrees of free-

dom in the system. The quantum mechanical state is given by a ket |(t)i,

which admits a coordinate representation hq|i = (q, t). The dynamical

evolution of the system is given by the Schrodinger equation

i

h |(t)i = H(pi , qj )|(t)i. (16)

t

It is also useful to recall the commutation relation between creation and

annihilation operator of harmonic oscillators

Here, I assumed there are many harmonic oscillators labeled by the subscript

i or j. The Hilbert space is constructed from the ground state |0i which

satisfies

ai |0i = 0 (18)

5

for all i. All other states are given by acting creation operators on the ground

state

1

|n1 , n2 , , nN i = (a1 )n1 (a2 )n2 (aN )nN |0i (19)

n1 !n2 ! nN !

We will use the same method to construct Hilbert space for the quantized

Schrodinger field.

4 Quantized Schr

odinger Field

Now we try to quantize the classical field theory given by the action Eq. (9).

The procedure is the same as in particle mechanics, except that the index i

that runs over all degrees of freedom is now replaced by ~x. What it means

is that ~x is not an operator (!) but merely an index. This is probably one of

the most confusing points about the field theory. (~x) at different positions

are regarded as independent canonical coordinates exactly in the same way

that qi with different i are regarded as independent canonical coordinates in

particle mechanics.

The canonically conjugate momenta (~x) of the canonical coordinates (~x)

is obtained from Eq. (9) in the same way as in Eq. (14), namely

L

(~x) = = i (~x). (20)

x)

(~

for complex conjugates (hermitean conjugates) for operators. Note that we

regard the integration over space ~x in the Lagrangian a generalization of the

summation over the index i in Eq. (11).

Given the canonical coordinates (~x) and canonical momenta (~x), we

introduce canonical commutation relation

h(~x ~y ). (21)

6

This defines the quantum theory of the Schrodinger field.1 The canonical

commutation relation Eq. (21) is very similar to the case of the harmonic

oscillator. We now go back to the normalization (~x) = (~x)/ h1/2 , and we

find

[(~x), (~y )] = (~x ~y ), [, ] = [ , ] = 0, (22)

which resembles the case of harmonic oscillator even better. Now you see

that the use of (~x) was more convenient (we are not afraid of having h

in the Lagrangian any more because we are discussing a quantum theory

anyway). We now regard (~x) as annihilation operator and (~x) creation

operator of a particle at position ~x.

The Hamiltonian of the system from the action Eq. (9) is read off in the

same way as in Eq. (11):

h2

! !

1 1

Z Z

H= d~x + ( ) = d~x

2

+ 2 2 . (23)

2 2 2m 2

, and introduced = h

Note that

H|0i = 0 (24)

because (~x) in the Hamiltonian annihilates directly the vacuum. A general

state must satisfy the Schrodinger equation in the same way as in particle

mechanics

h |(t)i = H|(t)i

i (25)

t

It is useful for later purpose to calculate the commutator [H, (~x)].

h2 ~y

" #

Z

1

[H, (~x)] = d~y (~y ) (~y ) + 2 (~y )(~y )2 , (~x)

2m 2

h2 ~x

!

1

= (~x) + 2 (~x)2(~x) . (26)

2m 2

1

The commutation relation is given in the Schrodinger picture, where the opera-

tors do not evolve in time while the states do. When switching to Heisenberg picture,

we have to specify that the canonical commutation relation holds only at equal times:

[(~x, t), (~y , t)] = [i (~x, t), (~y , t)] = ih(~x ~y ). Commutation relation of operators at

unequal times would depend on the dynamics of the system.

7

4.2 Fock Space

The canonical commutation relation Eq. (21) allows us to construct the

Hilbert space following the experience of the harmonic oscillator. The par-

ticular Hilbert space we construct below is called Fock space.

We define the vacuum |0i which is annihilated by the annihilation op-

erator

(~x)|0i = 0, (27)

and construct the Fock space by

You can use ((~x1 ))n1 as well, but we will not need it for the later discussions.

What is the physical meaning of the Fock space we have constructed?

It turns out that the state |~x1 , ~x2 , , ~xn i in Eq. (28) has a very simple

meaning: it is an n-particle state of identical bosons in the position eigenstate

at ~x1 , , ~xn . We will verify this interpretation below explicitly.

Let us first study the one-particle state

= h0|[(~x), (~y )]|0i

= h0|(~x ~y )|0i

= (~x ~y ). (30)

Therefore, this state is normalized in the same way as the one-particle posi-

tion eigenstate.

Recall that a general one-particle state in the usual formulation of quan-

tum mechanics is given by a linear superposition of position eigenstates as

Z Z

|i = |~xid~xh~x| |i = |~xid~x(~x), (31)

8

and hence the wave function is the weight factor in the superposition. Simi-

larly, we define a general one-particle state in the quantum field theory

Z Z

|(t)i = d~x (~x, t)|~xi = d~x (~x) (~x)|0i. (32)

perposition of the position eigenstates |~xi. But it turns out that this (~x)

corresponds to the Schrodinger wave function in the particle quantum me-

chanics. This can be seen by using the Schrodinger equation Eq. (25) with

the Hamiltonian Eq. (23) and the state Eq. (29). The l.h.s of the Schrodinger

equation is then

!

Z

h |(t)i = d~x i

i h (~x, t) |~xi. (33)

t t

On the other hand, the r.h.s of the Schrodinger equation is

Z

H|(t)i = d~x(~x)H (~x)|0i

Z

= d~x(~x)[H, (~x)]|0i

h2 ~x

!

Z

1

= d~x (~x) + 2 (~x)2(~x) (~x, t)|0i

2m 2

h2 ~x

!

Z

= d~x (~x, t) (~x)|0i

2m

h2

!

Z

= d~x (~x, t) |~xi. (34)

2m

Comparing Eqs. (33,34), we find

h2

i

h

(~x, t) = (~x, t) (35)

t 2m

which is nothing but a Schrodinger equation for a free one-particle wave

function (~x, t). Therefore, the Fock space with a single creation operator

correctly describes the one-particle quantum mechanics.

Let us next study the two-particle state

1

|~x1 , ~x2 i = (~x1 ) (~x2 )|0i. (36)

2

9

The first quantity we calculate is again its norm. Here we go:

1

h~x1 , ~x2 |~y1 , ~y2 i = h0|(~x2 )(~x1 ) (~y1 ) (~y2 )|0i

2

1

= h0|(~x2 )([(~x1 ), (~y1 )] + (~y1 )(~x1 )) (~y2 )|0i

2

1

= h0|(~x2 )(~x1 ~y1 ) (~y2 ) + (~x2 ) (~y1 )(~x1 )) (~y2 )|0i

2

1

= h0|(~x1 ~y1 )[(~x2 ), (~y2 )] + [(~x2 ), (~y1 )][(~x1 )), (~y2 )]|0i

2

1

= ((~x1 ~y1 )(~x2 ~y2 ) + (~x1 ~y2 )(~x2 ~y1 )) . (37)

2

This normalization suggests that we are dealing with a two-particle state

of identical particles, because the norm is non-vanishing when ~x1 = ~y1 and

~x2 = ~y2 , but also when ~x1 = ~y2 and ~x2 = ~y1 , i.e., two particles interchanged.

A general two-particle state is given by

Z

1 Z

|(t)i = d~x1 d~x2 (~x1 , ~x2 , t)|~x1 , ~x2 i = d~x1 d~x2 (~x1 , ~x2 ) (~x1 ) (~x2 )|0i.

2

(38)

Because [ (~x1 ), (~x2 )] = 0, the integration over ~x1 and ~x2 is symmetric

under the interchange ~x1 ~x2 , and hence (~x1 , ~x2 , t) = (~x2 , ~x1 , t). The

symmetry under the exchange suggests that we are dealing with identical

bosons.

The fact that we see two identical particles becomes clearer by again

working out the time evolution of a general state. Using the Schrodinger

equation Eq. (25) with the Hamiltonian Eq. (23) and the state Eq. (36), the

l.h.s of the Schrodinger equation is

!

Z

h |(t)i = d~x1 d~x2 i

i h (~x1 , ~x2 , t) |~x1 , ~x2 i. (39)

t t

On the other hand, the r.h.s of the Schrodinger equation is

Z

2H|(t)i = d~x1 d~x2 (~x1 , ~x2 , t)H (~x1 ) (~x2 )|0i

Z

= d~x1 d~x2 (~x1 , ~x2 , t)([H, (~x1 )] + (~x1 )H) (~x2 )|0i

h2 ~x1

!

Z

1

= d~x1 d~x2 (~x1 ) + 2 (~x1 )2(~x1 ) (~x1 , ~x2 , t) (~x2 )|0i

2m 2

10

Z

+ d~x1 d~x2 (~x1 , ~x2 , t) (~x1 )[H, (~x2 )]|0i

h2 ~x1

!

Z

= d~x (~x1 ) + 2 (~x1 )(~x1 ) (~x1 , ~x2 , t) (~x2 )|0i

2m

h2 ~x2

!

Z

1

+ d~x1 d~x2 (~x1 ) (~x2 ) + 2 (~x2 )2(~x2 ) (~x1 , ~x2 , t)|0i

2m 2

Z h2 ~x1

h2 ~x2

!

= 2 d~x1 d~x2 + + (~x1 ~x2 ) (~x1 , ~x2 , t)|~x1 , ~x2 i.

2m 2m

(40)

Comparing Eqs. (39,40), we find

h2 ~x1

h2 ~x2

!

i

h (~x1 , ~x2 , t) = + + (~x1 ~x2 ) (~x1 , ~x2 , t) (41)

t 2m 2m

which is nothing but a Schrodinger equation for two-particle wave func-

tion (~x, t), with a delta function potential as an interaction between them.

Therefore, the Fock space with two creation operators correctly describes the

two-particle quantum mechanics. If we want a general interaction potential

between them, the action Eq. (9) must be modified to

2

"Z ! #

1Z h

Z

S = dt h +

d~x i

d~xd~y (~x) (~y )V (~x ~y )(~y )(~x) .

2m 2

(42)

The corresponding Hamiltonian is

Z

h2

1Z

H= d~x

+ d~xd~y (~x) (~y )V (~x ~y )(~y )(~x). (43)

2m 2

You can follow exactly the same steps as above and derive the equation

h2 ~x1

h2 ~x2

!

i

h (~x1 , ~x2 , t) = + + V (~x1 ~x2 ) (~x1 , ~x2 , t). (44)

t 2m 2m

In summary, the quantized Schrodinger field correctly describes the two in-

teracting identical bosons appropriately.

Following the same analysis as two-particle case, we can consider the three-

particle state

1

|~x1 , ~x2 , ~x3 i = (~x1 ) (~x2 ) (~x3 )|0i, (45)

3!

11

and its norm is given by

1

= [(~x1 ~y1 )(~x2 ~y2 )(~x3 ~y3 ) + (~x1 ~y2 )(~x2 ~y3 )(~x3 ~y1 )

3!

+ (~x1 ~y3 )(~x2 ~y1 )(~x3 ~y2 ) + (~x1 ~y2 )(~x2 ~y1 )(~x3 ~y3 )

+(~x1 ~y3 )(~x2 ~y2 )(~x3 ~y1 ) + (~x1 ~y1 )(~x2 ~y3 )(~x3 ~y2 )] .

(46)

Z

|(t)i = d~x1 d~x2 d~x3 (~x1 , ~x2 , ~x3 , t)|~x1 , ~x2 , ~x3 i. (47)

Using the Hamiltonian Eq. (43), the Schrodinger equation reduces to

"

h

h (~x1 , ~x2 , ~x3 ) =

i

t 2m 2m 2m

#

+ V (~x1 ~x2 ) + V (~x1 ~x3 ) + V (~x2 ~x3 ) (~x1 , ~x2 , ~x3 ). (48)

1 Z

|i = d~x1 d~xn (~x1 , , ~xn ) (~x1 ) (~xn )|0i. (49)

n!

The symmetry of the wave function under interchange of any of the n particles

is automatic, and hence it describes identical bosons.

The total number of particles is an eigenvalue of the operator

Z

N= d~x (~x)(~x). (50)

This is probably obvious from the analogy to the harmonic oscillator, but

nonetheless let us prove it. First consider the commutators

Z Z

[N, (~x)] = d~y [ (~y )(~y ), (~x)] = d~y ((~y ~x))(~y ) = (~x), (51)

12

and also

Z Z

[N, (~x)] = d~y [ (~y )(~y ), (~x)] = d~y (~y )(~y ~x) = (~x). (52)

In other words, every time you change the order of the number operator N

and the creation operator , N increases by one. Note also

N |0i = 0, (54)

the eigenvalue of N on n-body state can be read off quite easily.

1

N |~x1 , , ~xn i = N (~x1 ) (~xn )|0i

n!

1

= (~x1 )(N + 1) (~xn )|0i

n!

=

1

= (~x1 ) (~xn )(N + n)|0i

n!

= n|~x1 , , ~xn i. (55)

We see that the operator N indeed picks up the number of the particles in a

given state as its eigenvalue.

It may be more intuitive to consider creation and annihilation operators in the

momentum space, because the Hamiltonian is diagonal in the momentum

space in the absence of the interaction potential.

Suppose that the whole system is in a cubic box of volume V = L3 with a

periodic boundary condition. This choice of the boundary condition is often

called the box normalization. Then the field operator can be expanded in

the Fourier series

1 X

(~x) = 3/2 a(~p)ei~p~x/h , (56)

L p

~

13

where

2

h

(nx , ny , nz )

p~ = (57)

L

with integer nx,y,z . The inverse transform is therefore

1 Z

a(~p) = 3/2 d~x(~x)ei~p~x/h . (58)

L

It is straightforward to calculate the commutation relations among the cre-

ation and annihilation operators in the momentum space:

1 Z

[a(~p), a (~q)] = d~xd~y [(~x)ei~p~x/h , (~y )ei~q~y/h ]

L3

1 Z

= d~xd~y (~x ~y )ei~p~x/h ei~q~y/h

L3 Z

1

= 3 d~xei(~p~q)~x/h

L

= p~,~q . (59)

This is nothing but the commutation relation for harmonic oscillators. Ob-

viously,

[a(~p), a(~q)] = [a (~p), a (~q)] = 0. (60)

It is instructive to rewrite the Hamiltonian in the momentum space. The

free part of the Hamiltonian is

Z

h2

H0 = d~x

2m

Z

1 XX i~

p~ h2

h

= d~x 3 a (~p)e x/

a(~q)ei~q~x/h

L p~ q~ 2m

Z

1 XX i~

p~ q2

h ~

= d~x a (~

p )e x/

a(~q)ei~q~x/h

L3 p~ q~ 2m

1 XX ~q2

= a (~

p ) a(~q)L3 p~,~q

L3 p~ q~ 2m

~2

X p

= a (~p)a(~p). (61)

p

~

2m

The free Hamltonian simply countes the number of particles in a given mo-

mentum state a (~p)a(~p) and assigns the energy p~2 /2m accordingly. The in-

14

teraction Hamltonian is somewhat more complicated

Z

1

H = d~xd~y (~x) (~y )V (~x ~y )(~y )(~x)

2

1 X Z 0 0

= 6

d~xd~y a (~p)a (~p0 )V (~x ~y )a(~q0 )a(~q)ei(~p~q)~x/h ei(~p ~q )~y/h

2L p~,~p0 ,~q,~q0

1 X Z

= d~xa (~p)a (~p0 )V (~x ~y )a(~q0 )a(~q)p~+~p0 ,~q+~q0 ei(~p~q)~x/h

2L3 p~,~p0 ,~q,~q0

1 X

= V (~p ~q)a (~p)a (~p0 )a(~q0 )a(~q)p~+~p0 ,~q+~q0 , (62)

2 p~,~p0 ,~q,~q0

with

1 Z

V (~p ~q) = d~x V (~x)ei(~p~q)~x/h . (63)

L3

Kroneckers delta represents the momentum conservation in the scattering

process due to the potential V .

Therefore the interpretation of the Hamiltonian is quite simple. The free

part counts the number of particles and associates the kinetic energy p~2 /2m

for each of them according to its momentum. The potential term causes

scattering, by annihilating two particles in momentum states ~q, ~q0 and create

them in different momentum states p~, ~q0 with the amplitude V (~p ~q) (note

that p~ ~q = ~q0 ~q0 because of the momentum conservation).

At this point, it is useful to note that one can introduce a term in the

potential that can change the number of particles, such as a a a aa for 2 3

body scattering if there is need for it. Indeed, when we discuss quantization of

radiation field (namely, theory of photons by quantizating classical Maxwell

field), we see a term in the Hamiltonian which creates or annihilates a photon.

Such an interaction can never be described in conventional Schrodinger wave

functions, but is possible in quantum field theory.

The Hamiltonian Eq. (43) describes interacting bosons but we are often inter-

ested in a system in a background potential. A good example is the electrons

in an atom, where all of them are moving in the background Coulomb po-

tential due to the nucleus. In this case, the correct field-theory Hamiltonian

15

is

h2 Ze2 e2

!

1

Z Z

H = d~x + d~xd~y (~x) (~y ) (~y )(~x).

2m |~x| 2 |~x ~y |

(64)

where the second term in the parantheses is the Coulomb pontential due to

the nucleus, while the last term is the Coulomb repulsion among electrons.

In this case, a more convenient expansion of the field operator would be

X

(~x) = anlm unlm (~x), (65)

nlm

where anlm is the annihilation operator and the c-number unlm (~x) is the

complete basis for expanding the field operator with. Then the state with

certain states filled can be written down as

fermions out of quantized Schrodinger field is the issue in the next section.

5 Fermions

We have seen that the quantized Schrodinger field gives multi-body states of

identical bosons. But we also need fermions to describe electrons, protons,

etc. How do we do that?

The trick is to go back to the commutation relations Eq. (22). Instead of

them, we can use anti-commutation relations

change flips the statistics completely and the same Hamiltonian Eq. (43)

describes a system of identical fermions.

One noteworthy point is that (~x)2 = 21 {(~x) , (~x) } = 0. What this

means is that one cannot create two particles at the same position, an ex-

pression of Paulis exclusion principle for fermions.

16

Here are a few useful identities. Similarly to the identity of commutators

[A, BC] = [A, B]C + B[A, C], we find

= ABC + BAC BAC BCA

= {A, B}C B{A, C} (68)

Similarly,

= ABC + ACB ACB CAB

= A{B, C} {A, C}B. (69)

Again it is useful to calculate the commutator [H, (~x)] for later pur-

poses.

[H, (~x)]

h2 ~y

"Z ! #

Z

1

= d~y (~y ) (~y ) + d~z (~y ) (~z)V (~y ~z)(~z)(~y ) , (~x)

2m 2

Z

h2 ~y

= d~y (~y )

{(~y ), (~x)}

2m

Z

1 h i

+ d~y d~z (~y ) (~z)V (~y ~z) (~z)(~y ), (~x)

2

2

h ~x Z

= (~x) + d~z (~x) (~z)V (~x ~z)(~z). (70)

2m

Consider a two-particle state

1 Z

|i = d~x1 d~x2 (~x1 , ~x2 ) (~x1 ) (~x2 )|0i. (71)

2

Because { (~x1 ), (~x2 )} = 0, or more explicitly

positions

(~x1 , ~x2 ) = (~x2 , ~x1 ). (73)

Such a state indeed describes identical fermions.

17

All other aspects of the discussions remain the same as in the case of

bosons. A general k-body state is

Z

1

|i = d~x1 d~xn (~x1 , , ~xn ) (~x1 ) (~xn )|0i (74)

n!

with the anti-symmetry of the Schrodinger wave function (~x1 , , ~xn ) re-

quired because of the anti-commutation relation (~xi ) (~xj ) = (~xj ) (~xi ).

The number operator is N = d~x (~x)(~x).

R

One weird point about fermion is that the classical limit of the field

=h 1/2 satisfies the anti-commutation relation

{(~x), (~y )} = h

(~x ~y ) 0 (75)

It is called a Grassmann number. The classical limit of Fermi field therefore

does not have a direct physical meaning, even though we need to deal with

Grassmann number in path integrals for Fermi fields.

18

- Mock 1 - VerbalTransféré parErly Mae
- Fields and Waves in Communication Electronics PDF DownloadTransféré parSarah
- Signatures of GodTransféré parsam iam / Salvatore Gerard Micheal
- Albert EinsteinTransféré paradel16
- TeleportationTransféré parDeepankar Anil Kumar
- Maxwell Theory Freeman DEGP aasdfasdfsdflajdf;asdjf;jsdjf;sdjlfj;sdjwopuqweouroewjafklsdj;l jcSelected Physical ConstantsEGP aasdfasdfsdflajdf;asdjf;jsdjf;sdjlfj;sdjwopuqweouroewjafklsdj;l jcSelected Physical ConstantsEGP aasdfasdfsdflajdf;asdjf;jsdjf;sdjlfj;sdjwopuqweouroewjafklsdj;l jcSelected Physical ConstantsEGP aasdfasdfsdflajdf;asdjf;jsdjf;sdjlfj;sdjwopuqweouroewjafklsdj;l jcSelected Physical ConstantsEGP aasdfasdfsdflajdf;asdjf;jsdjf;sdjlfj;sdjwopuqweouroewjafklsdj;l jcSelected Physical ConstantsEGP aasdfasdfsdflajdf;asdjf;jsdjf;sdjlfj;sdjwopuqweouroewjafklsdj;l jcSelected Physical ConstantsEGP aasdfasdfsdflajdf;asdjf;jsdjf;sdjlfj;sdjwopuqweouroewjafklsdj;l jcSelected Physical ConstantsEGP aasdfasdfsdflajdf;asdjf;jsdjf;sdjlfj;sdjwopuqweouroewjafklsdj;l jcSelected Physical ConstantsEGP aasdfasdfsdflajdf;asdjf;jsdjf;sdjlfj;sdjwopuqweouroewjafklsdj;l jcSelected Physical ConstantsEGP aasdfasdfsdflajdf;asdjf;jsdjf;sdjlfj;sdjwopuqweouroewjafklsdj;l jcSelected Physical ConstantsEGP aaTransféré parPhyo Thiha
- Term PaperTransféré parRaul Aswal
- MSc Physics SyllabusTransféré parAneez Koyatty
- The Electromagnetic Gauge Field Interpolation Between the Instant Forma Nd the Front Form of the Hamiltonian DynamicsTransféré parColt Bradley
- SuperfluidityTransféré parOliver Bardin
- hw4_solsTransféré parscribddbircsscribddb
- Noncom 1Transféré parPinaki Roy
- Quantum gravity is a result of U(1) repulsive dark energyTransféré parNige Cook
- L9Transféré parbob
- Carlos Calvet- The Background Field Theory (Virtual Particles and Fields of Force)Transféré parRtpom
- Hudpath(1)Transféré parBachir Mimouni
- Constantino Tsallis -- Nonextensive Physics- A Possible Connection Between Generalized Statistical Mechanics and Quantum GroTransféré parFrancisco Antonio Tello Ortiz
- q ComputingTransféré parBhushan Yadav
- Schrödinger's equation — what is it_ _ plus.mathsTransféré parsamuelcartaxo533
- Lecture 03Transféré parBeauponte Pouky Mezonlin
- Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and Economic Analogues of Basic Physical QuantitiesTransféré paragus purnomo
- Schrödinger Representation – Schrödinger EquationTransféré parAgnivesh Sharma
- A First Book of Quantum Field Theory [Lahiri-Pal]Transféré partulinne
- Beginner NCG.pdfTransféré parAnonymous 9rJe2lOskx
- lecture 6Transféré parsumit kumar
- Bohmian_Dispositions.pdfTransféré parPascalRodríguezWarnier
- operators.pptTransféré parTanmay Saini
- CE1Transféré parSamarjeet Kumar Singh
- Quantum Tunnelling WikiTransféré parValerioApicella
- Quantum PlasmonicsTransféré parChan Chen

- KOM AnimationTransféré parnagarajan224
- HW5Transféré parBrishen Hawkins
- UNIT - IITransféré parJit Agg
- Vijeo Cicode Course v7Transféré parHakan Erkmen
- PPT12.pptTransféré parPosess Mogapi
- Proceedings i Ber Chip 2012Transféré parClaudomir Júnior
- A Simulated Annealing Algorithm for Solving the School BusTransféré parAlexander Decker
- Topic 1 Quantitative Chemistry V2 AnsTransféré parAruba Dhaduk
- Design and Implementation of Faster and Low Power MultipliersTransféré parSusmita Mishra
- India Bix MCQ'sTransféré pararslanjameelmalik
- Chapter 13 (1)Transféré parShrey Mangal
- UKCAT tips.docxTransféré parAnonymous 3fKxW0CD0
- quiz_DP_2Transféré parPanda Damanik
- Motorola - The Company That Saved ItselfTransféré paraaron
- c72.pdfTransféré parLuis Anhuaman Mogrovejo
- Jurnal proses manufakturTransféré parNur Rokhim
- Math23x Exit Exam Questions - TrigonometryTransféré parAegee
- A Program to Check if a Binary Tree is BST or Not _ GeeksforGeeksTransféré pardeveshmanish
- Roof Control, Pillar Stability, And Ground Control Issues in Underground Stone MinesTransféré paralvaroaac4
- Advanced Excel ProgrammeTransféré parMufaddal Hussain
- Shooting ProofTransféré parpathanshamsheerkhan
- P2 Forces and Motion HigherTransféré pardownendscience
- Polytechinic Paper - 2015 (English)Transféré parMadhu Mahesh Raj
- Electric Glass melterTransféré parFranck Dubois
- 2.5 D Cavity BalancingTransféré parepiceno
- 88 Globality vs LocalityTransféré paragutierrezr
- Encyclopedia Physical Sci and Tech ComputerTransféré parSerchius Zolotareus
- FULLTEXT01.pdfTransféré parconcord1103
- 246Transféré parSilviu
- 12.2. MarcusTransféré parJason Baker