Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Miss Cook
Composition-01
27 February 2017
Are menstrual items a necessity? (n.d.). Retrieved February 27, 2017, from
https://docs.google.com/a/redstreaks.org/forms/d/1S6TiYncJjdyOlHGEYNu71VCZEIUTLf
fSxpcHhLUgsQE/edit#responses
This is a survey I conducted to help support the statements for my research paper. With this
survey, I was trying to prove that most people do not agree with the luxury tax and that
the people who do also said that free bleeding was unhygienic. This supports my hypothesis
that the people who say that tampons and pads are not a necessity have no other alternatives
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/04/opinions/tampon-tax-burns/
This is a great reference site for my research paper because it speaks about the unfairness of
womens hygiene products being taxed and it gives facts to prove the main point. It
discusses how women are routinely charged more for similar products to men and how they
are frustrating inconveniences. It presents facts to back up their claims, including: women
pay on average $1,351 more per year for the same products than men do. Women also can
not control their menstrual cycles and this requires them to buy products for which there is
no equivalent cheaper male product to replace them with. It is also discussed how women
can not just up and decide to stop using these products but in most states there is still a sales
tax to come with these products. Despite this, state governments frequently exempt many
other products that are not even necessary from sales tax, like prescription drugs, some over
the counter medicines, and groceries. But only five states have chosen not to tax tampons.
This reference site also brings up how women spend about $70 per year on tampons and
sanitary pads and multiplying that by how many years a woman has a period is way too
Ewens, T. R. (2015, October 28). Ten reasons the tampon tax is a joke. Retrieved February 26, 2017,
from
http://www.dazeddigital.com/artsandculture/article/27173/1/ten-reasons-the-tampon-tax-is-a-joke
This is another great source for my research because the whole text is an argument as to
why tampons should not be taxed. It also gives me propositions for good points
for my argument in my research including, you are getting taxed for having a uterus, having
periods is not a luxury, and similar mens products are not taxed the same way. It
argues how despite how rough your life may be at the moment, you can not
stop yourself from having a period. It happens every month whether you are
financially able or not. The article also brings up a good point that you may need food but
you do not need marshmallow tea cakes or sugary sweets but those are not taxed as a
luxury. Tampons tax does not work like an income tax so they are not cheaper for those who
can not afford them. Increasing the price of them only penalizes the women who need it
the most.
Gass-Poore', J. (2016, March 06). Citing Gender Bias, State Lawmakers Move To Eliminate
http://www.npr.org/2016/03/06/4673777295/
citing-gender-bias-state-lawmakers-move-to-eliminate-tampon-tax
This article begins by talking about how sales is not applied to Viagra in Wisconsin, but is
applied to tampons and pads. Representative Melissa Sargent spoke for NRP saying that,
womens health has been misunderstood and neglected throughout history. Some
women are ashamed of their period. She also added that the reluctance to talk about
it has prevented the issue from gaining more momentum in state legislatures.
Lawmakers in Chicago, Utah, Ohio, California, New York, Michigan, and Connecticut
proposed similar legislation to eliminate the tax that unfairly treats periods as a
disease or an illness or considers the products to be luxury items. This article is also
useful because it takes the time to describe what certain things are just in case a reader
may not understand. They explain the sales tax as, a tax thats assessed by a government when a
Tampon tax is real. Women everywhere pay their governments extra to have periods. (n.d.).
https://www.pri.org/stories/2015-08-15/tampon-tax-real-women-everywhere-pay-their-
governments-extra-have-periods
This is a great research resource because it provides a lot of great information on the history
of the tampon tax that I will have much use for in my paper. They begin by discussing the UK tax
in 1973 and how women were charged 17.5 percent to buy tampons and pads. Things
then changed in 2001 when campaigners managed to get value-added tax, on sanitary goods
reduced to 5 percent.
Bibliography/Works
Cited (1) All resources are All resources are All resources are All resources are
2 = Attempted to correctly cited in correctly cited in correctly cited in correctly cited in
demonstrate, but a MLA or APA MLA or APA MLA or APA MLA or APA
couple errors exist format format format format
Bibliography/Works
Cited (2) All resources are All resources are All resources are All resources are
2 = Attempted to correctly cited in correctly cited in correctly cited in correctly cited in
demonstrate, but a MLA or APA MLA or APA MLA or APA MLA or APA
couple errors exist format format format format
Content Use of content area Use of content area Use of content area Use of content area
Knowledge: Word vocabulary is vocabulary is vocabulary is vocabulary is
Choice consistently precise consistently precise consistently precise consistently precise
3 = Demonstrated and accurate and accurate and accurate and accurate
Sources: Variety Cited sources Cited sources Cited sources Cited sources
3 = Demonstrated represent various represent various represent various represent various
genres (ex. genres (ex. genres (ex. genres (ex.
literature, scholarly literature, scholarly literature, scholarly literature, scholarly
journal, journal, journal, journal,
encyclopedia, news encyclopedia, news encyclopedia, news encyclopedia, news
article, etc) article, etc) article, etc) article, etc)
Sources: Credibility All cited sources All cited sources All cited sources All cited sources
3 = Demonstrated come from come from come from come from
authoritative authoritative authoritative authoritative
resources resources resources resources
Sources: All resources are All resources are All resources are All resources are
Appropriateness appropriate for appropriate for appropriate for appropriate for
3 = Demonstrated target audience target audience target audience target audience
Quantity of Sources Document cites the Document cites the Document cites the Document cites the
3 = Demonstrated number of sources number of sources number of sources number of sources
outlined in the outlined in the outlined in the outlined in the
assignment assignment assignment assignment
Quality of Sources All sources cited All sources cited All sources cited All sources cited
3 = Demonstrated can be considered can be considered can be considered can be considered
reliable and/or reliable and/or reliable and/or reliable and/or
trustworthy trustworthy trustworthy trustworthy
Comments:
Total: 42/45
The formatting needs some work. I think you were trying to uses spaces instead of tabing the
information appropriately. Also, you want to consider all sides of the argument. What do
supporters of the pink tax say? Why should it remain in place? What is the exact language for
the tax law that describes what products must be taxed and what products should not be taxed?
Make sure you're exploring the topic from every issue before drawing a conclusion.