Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
SYLLABUS OUTCOMES:
LW1b.
describe
how
the
coordinated
function
of
internal
systems
in
multicellular
organisms
provides
cells
with
requirements
for
life,
including
gases,
nutrients
and
water,
and
removes
cell
wastes
Students learn to
WS6a.
collaboratively
and
individually
conducting
a
range
of
investigation
types,
including
fieldwork
and
experiments,
ensuring
safety
and
ethical
guidelines
are
followed
WS6f.
performing
specific
roles
safely
and
responsibly
when
working
collaboratively
to
complete
a
task
within
the
timeline
LESSON OVERVIEW:
Students perform heart acting as a pump and then perform coronal dissection of the heart.
KEY QUESTIONS:
RESOURCES/AIDS:
My computer
Heart Model
PowerPoint slides
9x Sheeps heart
8x scissors
9x dissection pans
Students
pack
up
(packing
up
instructions
displayed
on
smart
board)
Lesson
Plan
Analysis
102086 Designing Teaching & Learning 1H 2017
Evaluate
the
lesson
plan
according
to
the
following
Australian
Professional
Standards
for
Teachers.
Only
standards
directly
addressed
in
Designing
Teaching
&
Learning
that
are
relevant
to
this
assignment
have
been
included.
However,
this
does
not
mean
the
other
standards
are
irrelevant
to
lesson
planning
and
evaluation
more
generally.
Evaluate the lesson plan according to the following NSW Quality Teaching model elements.
Evaluation score refer to NSW QTM Classroom Practice Guide for each element
1
Intellectual
quality
1.1
Deep
knowledge
1
2
3
4
Comments:
Teacher
does
not
reference
to
link
to
previous
lessons.
This
5
lesson
is
a
entirely
individual
lesson,
not
specifically
linking
to
previous
knowledge.
However,
this
class
does
display
an
evident
amount
of
knowledge
to
be
learnt.
1.2
Deep
understanding
1
2
3
4
Comments:
Despite
the
you
tube
clip
being
shown
along
side
the
worksheet
5
activity
and
practical,
this
lesson
does
not
facilitate
deep
understanding
of
the
content
as
the
worksheet
activity
is
copied
straight
off
the
board,
and
there
is
no
assessment
type
to
assess
students
on
their
deep
level
of
understanding
from
the
clip
played
or
worksheet.
1.3
Problematic
knowledge
1
2
3
4
Comments:
There
are
no
discussions
that
are
planned
for
in
this
lesson,
which
5
wouldve
caused
students
to
discuss
the
information
in
a
social
construct
and
question
the
knowledge
learnt.
1.4
Higher-order
thinking
1
2
3
4
Comments:
Limited
higher
order
thinking.
Some
higher
order
thinking
can
5
occur
during
the
dissection
component
of
the
lesson,
however
there
should
be
more
incorporated
in
the
lesson,
possibly
through
a
class
discussion
or
debate.
1.5
Metalanguage
1
2
3
4
Comments:
Metalanguage
is
used
extensively
during
the
lesson
through
5
scientific
language.
1.6
Substantive
communication
1
2
3
4
Comments:
Students
communicate
throughout
this
lesson
in
their
group
work
5
during
the
dissection.
They
are
also
able
to
communicate
with
the
teacher
while
she
is
walking
around
throughout
the
lesson
to
check
class
work.
However,
there
can
be
substantive
communication
in
more
class
based
discussions.
Quality
learning
environment
2.1
Explicit
quality
criteria
1
2
3
4
Comments:
Some
explicit
quality
criteria
in
lesson
plan,
however
can
be
5
incorporated
through
specific
aims
for
results
of
practical.
2.2
Engagement
1
2
3
4
Comments:
Engagement
in
this
lesson
has
a
high
potential.
The
activities
are
5
changed
quite
often,
with
5
components
to
a
1-hour
lesson
duration.
Also
engagement
has
the
potential
to
be
high,
as
dissections
arent
performed
often
at
a
stage
5.
2.3
High
expectations
1
2
3
4
Comments:
Expectations
are
not
specifically
written
out
in
the
lesson
plan,
5
but
all
students
consciously
are
expected
to
abide
by
safety
rules.
2.4
Social
support
1
2
3
4
Comments:
Social
support
is
relevant
in
the
practical
component
of
this
5
lesson
plan,
as
students
are
working
in
groups
and
have
to
support
each
others
participation
and
effort
during
the
dissection
in
the
pursuit
of
learning.
2.5
Students
self-regulation
1
2
3
4
Comments:
Students
self-regulation
can
only
occur
during
the
practical
5
component.
There
is
room
for
much
more
self-regulation
in
this
lesson.
2.6
Student
direction
1
2
3
4
Comments:
This
is
a
set
class
and
does
not
allow
for
student
direction.
5
3
Significance
3.1
Background
knowledge
1
2
3
4
Comments:
Outcome
goals
are
mentioned
and
practical
component
is
based
5
on
knowledge
just
acquired
through
previous
activities.
This
is
making
connection
between
knowledge
and
practical.
However,
previous
knowledge
can
be
incorporated
in
this
lesson
plan.
3.2
Cultural
knowledge
1
2
3
4
Comments:
Cultural
groups
and
acceptance
is
not
mentioned
in
this
lesson
5
plan.
3.3
Knowledge
integration
1
2
3
4
Comments:
No
knowledge
integration
is
made,
however
this
lesson
can
be
5
integrated
with
PDHPE
and
understanding
the
heart
during
exercise.
3.4
Inclusivity
1
2
3
4
Comments:
Inclusivity
is
not
mentioned
in
the
lesson
plan,
however
has
5
potential
as
all
the
activities
are
broad
and
can
involve
everyone.
3.5
Connectedness
1
2
3
4
Comments:
There
are
no
activities
that
provide
connectedness
in
this
lesson
5
plan,
however
the
topic
of
the
heart
has
great
potential
to
include
connectedness.
3.6
Narrative
1
2
3
4
Comments:
There
are
no
narrative
or
personal
experiences
mentioned
or
5
discussed
in
this
lesson
plan.
Identify
the
two
APST
standards
and
two
NSW
QT
model
elements
you
are
targeting
for
improvement.
APST
1)
4.4
Maintain
student
safety
2)
5.1
Assess
Student
Learning
QT
model
1)
1.2
Deep
Understanding
2)
3.3
Knowledge
Integration
LW3. a,e
WS5.2 d
WS6. a,b,f
WS7.1 a,c
Outcomes
Assessment
Students
learn
about
Students
learn
to
WS7.1c.
Extracting
information
from
diagrams
and
multimedia
resources
Lesson
assessment
LW1b.
Describe
how
the
WS5.2d.
Describing
safety
coordinated
function
of
and
ethical
guidelines
to
be
Syllabus
outcomes
internal
systems
in
addressed
multicellular
organisms
SC5-1VA:
A
student
Kahoot
quiz
at
the
provides
cells
with
appreciates
the
end
of
the
lesson
to
requirements
for
life,
importance
of
assess
the
students
WS6a.
Collaboratively
and
including
gases,
nutrients
science
in
their
engagement
and
individually
conducting
a
and
water,
and
removes
lives
and
the
role
understanding
of
range
of
investigation
cell
wastes
of
scientific
appreciating
the
types,
including
fieldwork
inquiry
in
importance
of
and
experiments,
ensuring
increasing
science
in
their
lives.
safety
and
ethical
understanding
of
LW3
a.
Relate
the
organs
guidelines
are
followed
involved
in
human
the
world
around
reproductive
systems
to
them.
their
function
WS6.b
assembling
and
SC5-6WS:
A
student
Assess
the
proper
using
appropriate
undertakes
first
dissection
of
the
equipment
and
resources
LW3
e.
Describe,
using
hand
investigation
sheeps
heart.
to
perform
the
examples,
how
to
collect
valid
investigation,
including
developments
in
and
reliable
data
safety
equipment
technology
have
and
information,
Ask
students
to
advanced
biological
individually
and
locate
ventricles,
understanding.
collaboratively.
atria
and
valves.
Also
WS6f.
Performing
specific
ask
students
to
roles
safely
and
responsibly
demonstrate
(like
when
working
the
teacher
collaboratively
to
complete
previously
did
in
the
a
task
within
the
timeline
class)
how
the
sheeps
heart
works
as
a
pump.
WS7.1a.
Summarising
data
Time
Teaching
and
learning
actions
Organisation
Centered
from
students'
own
investigations
T/S
Cross Curriculum themes & General capabilities Explicit subject specific concepts and skills
Resources:
Body
Informally
assessing
information
Teacher:
Walks
around
and
assist
Student
attained
students
individually
with
questions
(Phase
1)
about
heart
diagrams
10
minutes
Students
given
picture
of
heart
and
asked
to
label
parts
of
the
heart
and
Student:
Students
fill
out
heart
cardiovascular/respiratory
systems
that
diagram
worksheet
individually
based
had
just
been
shown
in
the
You
Tube
on
knowledge
just
presented
in
You
link.
tube
clip
Student:
Resources:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xz
iOtFB7L8g
Student:
Resources:
9x Sheeps heart
9x Scalpels
9x Forceps
9x Dissection pan
Reflection
What
have
I
learned
about
the
teaching
and
learning
process
when
preparing
this
lesson?
While
modifying
this
lesson
plan,
it
was
relevant
that
the
importance
of
generating
a
deep
understanding
of
the
content
and
assessing
student
knowledge
was
absent.
I
decided
to
change
these
aspects
of
the
lesson
plan
and
provide
the
grade
9
students
with
informal
and
formal
assessment
mediums
throughout
the
lesson.
These
will
support
students
in
paying
attention,
as
they
are
aware
they
will
be
assessed
or
asked
questions
throughout
the
lesson.
This
will
assist
in
a
higher
learning
process.
I
also
decided
to
focus
on
maintaining
student
safety,
as
the
previous
lesson
plan
did
not
put
an
emphasis
on
this.
Grade
9
students
are
14-15
years
old,
and
are
not
reliable
to
leave
along
with
sharp
equipment.
Thus,
I
provided
these
students
with
a
risk
assessment
through
an
informal
formative
assessment
(Kahoot
quiz)
to
remember
what
can
be
of
risk
in
the
practical.
Overall,
this
assessment
has
really
opened
up
my
perspective
on
creating
lesson
plans
for
classes
and
made
my
career
as
a
teacher
finally
come
to
life.
Without
a
lesson
plan
prepared,
students
are
not
getting
the
most
out
of
their
learning
and
teachers
cannot
perform
their
best.
Lesson
plans
have
great
potential,
as
they
assist
in
making
sure
students
are
completing
all
of
their
curriculum
content,
outcomes,
cross-curriculum
themes
and
general
capabilities.
How
am
I
measuring
the
outcomes
of
this
lesson?
Reflection - WHS
What
are
the
key
risk
issues
that
may
appear
for
and
need
to
be
reduced/eliminated
in
this
lesson?
Using
your
syllabus
and
support
documents
as
well
as
other
WHS
policy-
Outline
the
key
WHS
considerations
that
are
to
be
applied
in
this
lesson?
The
key
risk
issues
that
have
potential
to
appear
in
this
lesson
plan
is
safety
during
the
practical
component.
Stage
5
students
will
be
given
a
scalpel
to
dissect
a
sheeps
heart.
Thus
they
must
be
shown
how
to
use
the
equipment
and
also
be
notified
that
they
are
responsible
for
the
safety
of
their
peers,
when
handling
the
scientific
knife.
I
have
modified
the
lesson
plan
to
include
a
risk
assessment
quiz,
along
side
making
lab
coats
and
goggles
compulsory
for
each
student
during
the
dissection.
Academic
Justification
The
initial
lesson
plan
was
a
widespread
document,
containing
substantial
strengths
in
its
core.
However,
when
evaluated
it
is
evident
that
the
lesson
plan
has
a
few
significant
flaws
which
needed
to
be
addressed.
The
lesson
plan
was
modified
in
association
with
two
Australian
Professional
Standards
for
Teachers
(AITSL,
2016)
and
two
Quality
teaching
model
elements
(Ludwig
&
Gore,
2003).
The
Australian
Professional
Standards
for
Teachers
(AITSL,
2016)
were
attended
to
by
modifying
the
lesson
plan
to
suit
standard
4.4,
Maintain
student
safety.
Schools
must
include
all
precautions
to
ensure
safety
in
the
learning
environment
(American
Psychological,
2008).
The
lesson
plan
was
modified
to
include
an
initial
risk
assessment
quiz
through
Kahoot,
which
formally
assesses
students
knowledge
on
safety
precautions
during
the
dissection
practical,
through
the
use
of
ICT,
with
the
aim
to
accentuate
the
responsibility
of
safety
on
the
students
(American
Psychological,
2008).
Maintaining
overall
school
safety
is
a
priority
in
the
Australian
Professional
Standards
(AITSL,
2016)
as
teachers
work
their
way
towards
evaluating
student
wellbeing
policies,
along
side
safe
learning
environments
and
practices.
These
modifications
made
to
student
safety
addressed
the
significance
of
a
safe
environment,
which
was
not
present
in
the
original
lesson
plan,
facilitating
a
high
level
of
learning.
The
second
standard
modified
was
5.1
Assess
student
learning
(AITSL,
2016).
The
term
assessment
is
a
way
of
determining
the
standard
of
student
learning
that
has
taken
place
(Sundberg,
2002).
This
standard
is
essential
for
the
teacher
to
track
individual
and
class
progress
daily
based
on
instruction
(Sundberg,
2002).
Formative
assessments
are
essential
and
most
important
in
evaluating
instruction
and
its
effect
on
student
learning
throughout
the
lesson
(Frechtling
&
Westat,
1997).
Formative
assessments
are
modified
in
abundance
in
the
lesson
plan,
to
allow
for
teachers
to
reflect
on
the
success
of
the
content
approach,
resulting
in
better
class
plans
and
thus
further
potential
for
student
learning
(Sundberg,
2002).
In
regards
to
the
NSW
quality
teaching
model
(Ludwig
&
Gore,
2003)
enhancements
were
made
to
element
1.2
Deep
understanding.
The
original
lesson
plan
showed
a
faint
amount
of
focus
on
deep
understanding.
Students
were
originally
asked
to
copy
the
board
onto
their
worksheet.
The
lesson
plan
was
amended
to
better
the
content
understanding
for
students
through
having
to
individually
complete
the
worksheet
after
they
have
been
given
the
information
through
the
You
Tube
clip.
This
individual
work
will
initiate
the
generation
of
a
understanding
throughout
the
lesson
(Ludwig
&
Gore,
2003).
This
knowledge
is
further
explored
when
the
students
complete
the
practical
component
of
the
lesson
and
later
integrate
their
understanding
of
their
knowledge
to
other
key
learning
areas,
in
the
final
class
discussion
(Cutts
&
Simon,
2012).
This
final
discussion
fosters
the
increase
of
deep
understanding
through
peer
instruction,
which
allows
students
to
go
back
and
forth
between
one
another
to
understand
the
problem
and
solution,
rather
than
just
copying
the
board
(Cutts
&
Simon,
2012).
This
approach
is
designed
to
maintain
the
expansion
of
deep
understanding
and
is
essentially
relevant
to
the
standard
educational
framework
and
is
applicable
to
all
key
learning
areas
(Cutts
&
Simon,
2012).
The
final
dimension
point
that
is
improved
in
this
lesson
plan
is
3.3
Knowledge
Integration.
Knowledge
integration
is
of
great
importance
in
everyday
schooling.
Through
the
success
of
integrating
knowledge,
students
accentuate
their
deep
understanding
and
form
connections
between
topics
and
different
subjects.
According
to
Butler
&
Linn
(1991),
the
process
of
knowledge
integration
helps
students
make
sense
of
events,
and
form
associations
between
different
processes
that
have
the
same
fundamental
principles.
Improvements
were
made
to
allow
the
students
the
freedom
of
a
class
discussion
at
the
end
of
the
period,
so
they
can
reiterate
and
further
discuss
what
they
have
learnt
and
understood.
This
has
shown
to
give
a
better
understanding
of
content
to
students
who
take
part
in
integrating
knowledge
(Songer,
1989).
The
teacher
than
directs
the
students
to
integrate
their
knowledge
through
acknowledging
the
heart
in
a
PDHPE
sense
and
how
exercise
affects
the
heart.
The
knowledge
is
also
integrated
with
the
importance
of
technology
in
science
and
the
fascinating
creation
of
pace
makers.
When
students
have
the
opportunity
to
integrate
knowledge,
they
realise
the
importance
of
science
in
their
everyday
lives
and
the
essence
of
hope
it
brings
(Butler
&
Linn,
1991).
The
modifications
made
in
the
overall
lesson
plan,
resulted
in
a
more
student
directed
approach,
allowing
students
to
work
together
to
result
in
the
exploration
of
relationships
in
order
to
assemble
justifications
in
systematic,
integrated
and
complex
ways
(Ludwig
&
Gore,
2003)
and
facilitate
a
high
potential
for
learning.
References
American
Psychological
Association
Zero
Tolerance
Task
Force.
(2008).
Are
Zero
Tolerance
Policies
Effected
in
the
Schools?:
An
Evidentiary
Review
and
Recommendations.
The
American
Psychologist,
63(9),
853.
Frechtling,
J.,
and
Westat,
L.
S.,
Eds.
(1997).
User-Friendly
Handbook
for
Mixed
Method
Evaluations,
Washington,
DC:
National
Science
Foundation
(NSF
97-143).
Ludwig,
J.,
&
Gore,
J.
(2003).
Quality
Teaching
in
NSW
Public
Schools
A
classroom
practice
guide
Retrieved
from
http://www.rqt.edu.au/files/5514/1774/9895/NSW_DET_2003-
Quality_Teaching_Guide.pdf
Muskopf,
S.
(2011).
The
Dissection
of
the
Sheep
Heart
[Video
File].
Retrieved
from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xziOtFB7L8g
Simon,
B.,
&
Cutts,
Q.
(2012).
Peer
Instruction:
A
Teaching
Method
to
Foster
Deep
Understanding.
Communications
of
the
ACM,
55(2),
27-29.
Songer,
N.B.
(1989).
Promoting
integration
of
instructed
and
natural
world
of
knowledge
in
thermodynamics.
Unpublished
doctoral
dissertation,
University
of
California,
Berkeley,
CA.
Songer,
N.
B.,
&
Linn,
M.
C.
(1991).
How
Do
Students
Views
of
Science
Influence
Knowledge
Integration?
Journal
of
Research
in
Science
Teaching,
28
(9),
761-784.
Sundberg,
M.
D.
(2002).
Assessing
Student
Learning.
Cell
Biology
Education,
1,
11-15.