CHAPTER - 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1.0 Evolution of knowledge

Human beings are the unique creation of evolution of life on the earth. Since their
origin, their greater curiosity always encouraged them to speculate about the operation
of the universe and to remain engaged in constant search of knowledge. Knowledge is
a familiarity with someone or something, which can include facts, information,
descriptions, or skills acquired through experience or education. Plato famously
defined knowledge as "justified true belief."1 However, no single agreed upon
definition of knowledge exists. Knowledge can also be defined as the sum of what is
known : the body of truth, information, and principles acquired by humankind.
According to Webster's Dictionary, knowledge is "the fact or condition of knowing
something with familiarity gained through experience or association."2 Knowledge
acquisition involves complex cognitive processes: perception, communication,
association and reasoning.

It is in the very nature of man to try to make his world, and life itself, meaningful and
significant. Therefore, he also tries to extend his knowledge in order to improve his
way of life, thereby rendering it more comfortable and more secure. Almost
everything that we know originates from four basic sources: 3

Senses
Authority
Reason
Intuition

Information from the senses is called empirical knowledge and empiricists believe
that the fundamental source of all knowledge is our senses. Our senses like sight,
sound, smell, touch and taste are exploratory organs. We use them all to become
acquainted with the world we live in. through different senses human beings learnt
that what is sweet and what is sour. Sounds soothe, warn, or frighten. The sun is

1
bright and the moon is cold. Through millions of single sense-events, they built a
fabric of empirical information, which helped them interpret, survive in, and control
the world for them.

In addition to sense knowledge, their most of the knowledge was based on the
experiences derived by some authority or specialists of any field among them. They
trusted and accepted the knowledge recorded by any reputed person without any
doubt or reasoning. Still, all of our historical knowledge is acquired in this way, as is
most of our knowledge of the sciences. We cannot experience the past or personally
repeat every experiment, so we must trust the specialists and accept, though not
blindly, the discoveries they record for us. Over many centuries human believed that,
the God or any super natural power is the controlling authority of the universe, which
controls the working of sun, stars, wind and rain. However, gradually they began to
observe certain cause-effect relationship in the different processes of their
environment. This began the tradition of doubt, questioning and reasoning as a source
of generating knowledge. Reasoning might be defined as the process of using known
facts to arrive at new facts. Reasoning generally comes in two forms: deduction and
induction. Deduction involves drawing out valid conclusions from previously
known facts e.g. all cats are animals, Tom is a cat, so Tom is an animal. Induction,
on the other hand, involves jumping from some things one has observed to making
universal statements about all things e.g. I drop this pencil and it falls, so it is likely
all dropped pencils (and indeed things) will fall.

In addition to senses, authority and reason, intuition also helped them to solve their
many problems suddenly. Intuition refers to insights or bits of knowledge, which
suddenly appears into consciousness resulting in solution of any problem. We all
probably have experienced where the answer to a question we were previously
thinking about but have currently forgotten has suddenly popped into our minds for
no reason. This is intuition and, as such, like reason, it too is dependent on our senses
to provide the raw material on which the subconscious works. Sometimes intuition
seems to be a feeling. We often say something like "I have the feeling he is not
telling the truth," without being sure of why.

2
With the increasing funds of knowledge, they started to explore the nature more and
more to make their life more meaningful. Humans began to practice agriculture,
domesticating plants and animals, which allowed for the growth of civilization. They
made different kinds of tools for hunting and farming, invented fire for cooking and
safety. Each such discovery and invention enriched their understanding in different
fields of knowledge. Gradually the heavy accumulation of new discoveries and
information of different kinds encouraged them to categorize the accumulated
knowledge into different fields. Division of labour in early societies of human beings
also enforced such categorization of knowledge. For e.g. those who were efficient in
farming, tried to accumulate more knowledge of this field. Those who could estimate
time on the basis of solar and lunar movements became earlier astrologers. Those who
domesticated animals became pioneer in the field of animal husbandry.

This early categorization of knowledge was based on conception of difference and

similarity. The first and most fundamental element of human knowledge is their
conception of difference and likeness between the sensations, and these sensations
themselves. Without this conception of difference and likeness, we cannot get
anywhere at all, either in thought or observation. It is the most elementary starting
point of all thinking and observing. The conception of difference and likeness in
various thoughts and observations led human beings towards differentiation and
specialization of knowledge. During this process of specialization, a huge body of
experiences was gained from a variety of fields and a number of important discoveries
and inventions were made. It developed a hierarchy of knowledge.

1.2.0 Specialization and organization of knowledge: Birth of

disciplines
The gaining of experiences in different fields and their further specialization results in
the organization of knowledge of various fields. This organized body of knowledge
of a particular field was termed as discipline. A discipline is a product of human
experience having distinct origin, subject matter, theoretical foundation and research
methodology. Each discipline has a structure of knowledge. This means knowledge in
a given discipline can be seen in certain arrangement. The structure of knowledge

3
across subjects is quite varied depending upon what and how knowledge is generated
in these areas.

According to John D. McNeil (1971)4, There are approximately one thousand

separate disciplines, although many of them can be categorized under the headings of
the natural sciences, the social sciences, mathematics, and the humanities. Each
discipline is composed of an association of researchers who follow common
procedures in pursuing an area of inquiry. Disciplines are born when there is a need
for the production of knowledge now not available. They die when they can no longer
simplify our understanding of life, do not direct attention to factors of importance in
resolving problems, do not give ways to relate these factors, and do generate new
questions for investigation. For e.g. specialization of knowledge in the fields of
biology and chemistry gave birth to biochemistry. Similarly new disciplines like
oceanography, poultry farming, geophysics, IT and management etc. have emerged
because of their great relevance to the developing world.

1.3.0 Importance of categorizing knowledge in disciplines

According to R. Stichweh (2001)5, Discipline as the primary unit of internal
differentiation of knowledge is an invention of nineteenth-century society. There
exists a long semantic prehistory of disciplina as a term for the ordering of knowledge
for purposes of instruction in schools and universities. However, only the nineteenth
century establishes real disciplinary communication systems. They are based on
specialization of scholars, on role differentiation in the organizations of knowledge,
the emergence of standard forms of publication and the rise of the research
imperative, which demands a continuous search for novelties. All these structural
changes combined to the disciplinary community as a new type of communication
system in science. After having been established, the discipline functions as the unit
of structure formation in the social system of science; in systems of higher education,
as subject domain for teaching and learning in schools; and finally as designation of
occupational and professional roles.

4
Although processes of differentiation of knowledge have been going on ever since,
discipline as a basic unit of structure formation is stabilized by these plural roles in
different functional contexts of modern society. Finally, each individual discipline is
embedded into an internal environment of other disciplines. The continuous mutual
observation and interaction of these disciplines is the most important factor in the
dynamics of modern science. The overall level of classification of disciplines is
related to the organizational structures of universities and other research institutions.
In fact, the number of disciplines is great. They are divided into several general
braches: 6

i. Humanities
These disciplines study the human condition. The main methods they use are analytic
and critical. Among humanities are: literature, ancient and modern languages, law,
history, philosophy, religion, arts. Humanities deal with different cultures, world of
art and history. Today, the main direction of work is the exploration and
understanding of human experience.

ii. Social sciences

Social sciences include such disciplines as anthropology, archaeology, economics,
geography, history, linguistics, political science, psychology. Their task is to explore
the aspects of human society, its development and all the processes that influence it.

iii. Natural sciences

These sciences include such disciplines as Astronomy, Biology, Chemistry, Earth
science and Physics. Their task is to explore natural phenomena and all processes that
undergo our planet.

iv. Formal sciences

This branch of knowledge deals with formal systems like logic, mathematics, systems
theory, computer science, information theory, decision theory and statistics. These
sciences use symbols and theoretical rules.

5
v. Professional and Applied sciences
Professional sciences are connected with a certain profession. They are: Agriculture,
Architecture and design, Business, Divinity, Education, Engineering, Environmental
studies and Forestry, Health sciences and others. In their turn, these are divided into
disciplines that are more specific in order to learn one's profession.

The above classification is not widely accepted by scholars of different

disciplines. There is no consensus on how some academic disciplines should be
classified, for e.g., whether anthropology and linguistics are social sciences
disciplines or humanities disciplines.7 Similarly, nature of education as a discipline is
still not clear, while some scholars place it in social sciences others in applied or
professional studies. The proper criteria for organizing knowledge into disciplines are
also open to debate.

1.4.0 Need to know the nature of a discipline

To be able to provide an appropriate treatment to the content in a subject, the teacher
needs an overview of the nature of content or knowledge in a given subject. As the
students move from elementary to secondary to higher secondary stages, they are in a
position to understand and appreciate the relationship between learning acquired
through stages and the knowledge structure in a subject. Through different stages,
learning turns from general understanding to knowledge that is more specialized. This
specialized knowledge has a structure of its own. At the higher secondary stages,
subject specific knowledge areas like Physics and Chemistry rather than general
science, and knowledge areas of History, Geography, Political Science rather than
social studies, are indicative of different knowledge domains with structure of their
own.

In the view of Lakshmi & Yadav (2003)8, The subject matter, which the
teacher has to teach the students, seen in relation to its linkage with knowledge
structure of the concerned disciplines, serves as the main basis for deciding activities
and learning experiences to be provided. The structure of knowledge across subjects
also depends upon the way knowledge gets generated and accumulated in these areas.

6
For example, knowledge in sciences is observation based while language and
literature, fine arts, performing arts are based on individual creativity and originality,
therefore not observational in nature.

The nature of a particular discipline decides its placement in a particular faculty or

department of an institution. Accordingly, different teaching-learning activities are
organized for the transaction of knowledge of a particular discipline. Largely, the
choice of subjects by students can be directly related to the nature of a particular
subject. For example, students who are inquisitive, keen observer and like
experiments in daily life, generally found suitable for studying sciences. On the other
hand, students who are creative and value emotions and feelings, who can express
themselves well and have a good aesthetic sense have aptitude for studying literature
and fine arts. On the basis of the nature of a subject, a teacher can understand that
who can understand a subject well, accordingly students can be guided to opt a
particular field of study.

1.5.0 Education as a discipline

Education is a distinct discipline, which was the product of humans efforts to share
the accumulated knowledge and experiences to other individuals. The main inquiry
related to the origin of education as a discipline is "how to educate or make learn an
individual. The discipline aroused to fulfill the need of theoretical bases that guide
the practice of teaching for pupil teachers. Later on, it expanded its branches to other
fields where the need of educating the people aroused, such as, adult education and
population education. In this way, it has become a vast field of study encompassing
various sub disciplines related to education of different individuals in different fields.
The term education does not designate a field of study only. In addition, it has other
meanings too. Before discussing education as a discipline, it is necessary to analyze
the various meanings of the term education.

1.5.1 Meaning of education

To answer the question What is education is not so simple. If one has to answer
what is physics, he can simply reply, Physics is a discipline which studies properties
of matter the answer for psychology is study of behaviour and for biology it is
7
study of living beings. However, a single term education has different meanings
when used in different senses.

The term education is derived from Latin word educere, educare, and educatum,
which means 'to draw out', 'to bring up', to lead out', to train or to educate.9 It means
education refers to leading out internal hidden talent of a child or person. According
to its dictionary meaning the term can be interpreted in one or more of the following
ways: 10

1. The act or process of acquiring knowledge, especially systematically during

childhood and adolescence.
2. The knowledge or training acquired by this process: his education has been
invaluable to him.
3. The act or process of imparting knowledge, especially at a school, college, or
university: education is my profession.
4. The theory of teaching and learning / the science or art of teaching; pedagogies: a
course in education.
5. A particular kind of instruction or training: woman education, consumer education.
6. A degree, level, or kind of schooling: primary education, a university education.

It is clear by above interpretation that the term Education can be broadly defined in
three ways:-

i. As knowledge
Knowledge is the sum total of facts, truths, laws, principles, and ideas that
man has produced. The knowledge acquired by formal and informal means
from life until death is termed as education. In Indian tradition, meaning of
education includes knowledge of Brahma, knowledge of the universe and
knowledge of the self.11

ii. As a process
Education is the formal process by which society deliberately transmits its
accumulated knowledge, skills, customs and values from one generation to

8
 another; it is a process of educating or teaching. It is the process of
development of mental and physical skills- motor, thinking, communication,
social, and aesthetic. According to John Dewey, Education is not a
preparation for life, rather it is the living. Education is the process of living
through a continuous reconstruction of experiences. It is the development of
all those capacities in the individual which will enable him to control his
environment and fulfill his possibilities.12

iii. As a subject or discipline

Encyclopedia Britannica (2008)13 defined education as a discipline that is
concerned with methods of teaching and learning in schools or school-like
environments as opposed to various non-formal and informal means of
socialization. However, discipline of education is not limited to the system of
schooling and pedagogy only. In addition, it includes processes and systems of
educating diverse groups on diverse issues.

1.5.2 Status of Education as a Discipline

Despite the wide recognition of its importance in social development, education, as a
discipline, has remained largely underdeveloped. There is a great discussion among
scholars about the entity of education as a separate discipline. Education as a separate
discipline is rich of many facts, concepts, principle and laws, which furnish the
theoretical structure of the discipline. All the inquiries related to field of education can
be answered on the basis of those theoretical structures. All those features related to
education support the view that education is a separate discipline, which has its
distinct origin, theoretical structure, and foundation and research methodology.

1.6.0 Need and importance of the Study

Since long education as a discipline is searching its identity. The disciplinary status of
education is currently under debate. The discipline of tremendous social importance
fail to establish itself as an autonomous and academically respected discipline. There
are different views regarding the disciplinary status of education. Broadly, these
views can be classified in to following groups:

9
i. Education can never be a discipline
Some scholars (Peters 196314, Hughes 196315, Conant 196416 and Woods17)
believe that education is not a separate discipline. It is only a loose combination
of different disciplines such as philosophy, sociology and psychology etc.
According to them, education does not have its own knowledge base and
knowledge generation mechanisms. In addition, it borrows most of the concepts
and methods from other disciplines. This view raises many questions like, If
education is not a discipline than, is there its alternative in the form of any other
discipline? and What is the need of combining content of different disciplines in
the form of education if we can study its foundational disciplines separately? It
is also asked that if the owing of content and methods is the only criterion to be
recognized as discipline then most of the existing disciplines that share and adopt
content and methods would be considered as non- disciplines.

ii. Education is a distinct discipline

Some other educationists (Walton & Kuethe 196318, Walton 1971,19 Belth
1965,20 Solitis 1968,21 and Yadav & Lakshmi, 199522) defend disciplinary status
of education by proving limitations of other social sciences as disciplines or they
regard it as an applied discipline. However, such efforts are not doing full justice
with a discipline full of potential and possibilities to be recognised as a unique
discipline. The real error lay in the method of trying to establish a unique
discipline of education by comparing it to other, familiar disciplines. As an area
of study, education is not like mathematics or physics and it is not similar to
psychology or sociology. By comparing it with other disciplines, we dilute the
status of a unique discipline. Therefore, the need is to explore distinctness of
education as a discipline. If a discipline is to take on a direction of its own, its
character and goals must be clearly defined. Identification merely as an applied
science does not afford such clarification.
iii. Education is not a single discipline but interdisciplinary or
multidisciplinary in nature
On the other hand, some scholars (G. Biesta 200923, S. Kumar 201224) question
the disciplinary classification of the knowledge. They propound that each
10
 discipline in some or other way related to other. They insist to remove boundaries
between different disciplines. These efforts gave birth to interdisciplinary and
multidisciplinary approaches. This view considers education not just a single
discipline but also a field where interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary
contribution is necessary for enrichment of scholarship.

iv. Education is not a discipline but a transdiscipline

Some more enthusiastic scholars (Palaiologou 201025) consider education more
than a discipline and place it beyond the ordinary limits of a discipline. They
designate education as a transdiscipline. According to their claim, Education
Studies by its nature and complexity cannot seek identity as mono, inter, and
multidisciplinary approaches. They suggest that, given the complexity of the
context it serves to match, instead Educational Studies is embedded within
transdisciplinarity.

Due to different interpretations given by different scholars education is called by

different names:
a. An established discipline
b. An emerging discipline
c. Applied or professional study
d. Pseudo-science
e. A family of related discipline
f. A field of study
g. A practical activity communicates content of other disciplines
h. Discipline of disciplines

The study of education does not fit completely into any of the categories listed here; it
may, in fact, constitute an original approach to the study of a familiar and continually
interesting phenomenon. The clouds of doubt on the nature of education have
negative impacts on the growth of this field of study as also points out by Vashishtha,
2010:26
i. It is not yet regarded as a discipline. In administrative or competitive exams for
various recruitments, it is not given the status of a subject.
11
ii. It is charged that education borrows most of its content from parent disciplines
like philosophy, sociology, psychology and even statistics. Thus, it does not have
its own subject matter.
iii. The discipline is reduced to mere teacher training.
iv. Some regarded it as a mere profession, rather than a discipline.
v. In many states of India, for e.g., in M. P. teacher education institutions come
under school education. At national level also, teacher education is covered under
school education department of the Ministry of HRD.

From the above discussion, it is clear that there is an urgent need to clear the doubts
over the disciplinary status of education. Since long the nature of the discipline has
remain unclear, while its identity is typically determined by administrative
convenience and market demand rather than analysis of its historical development and
27
scholarly position within the system of arts and sciences. Marc Belth (1965)
answers the question, why there is a need to establish a discipline of education, in
these words, In a world in which knowledge is increased in terms of the ability to
make clean distinctions where none existed before, and where knowledge makes
possible activity not otherwise possible, why not develop distinctness which we have
all suspected were begun long ago, and which are now growing more evident, more
quickly? There is a great need for a distillation of the thinking of the past half century,
and for an understanding of the direction being taken by education.

The present study is an effort to go back over some of the ideas, which have led
education to where it is today. The study does not claim to establish education as a
discipline but attempts to give it an identity, which is most suitable for it. The study is
needed to know what is educational in education? that is how it is distinct from its
foundational disciplines? The study has tried to work out a basis from which
development of a clearly defined study of education, as a uniquely distinctive,
theoretical as well as practical, self-correcting, and internally directing mode of
inquiry can be instituted.

12
1.7.0 Statement of the problem

The problem of the present investigation can be specifically stated below:

Development of Education as a Discipline- An Analytical Study

1.8.0 Definition of key terms

Development: Development is a continuous process. During this process, disciplines

evolve, grow and enrich their content and methods. These all are different phases of
development of a discipline. The study is an attempt to study these developmental
phases of education as a field of study. The study is an effort to explore those qualities
of education, which have helped in developing it as a distinct field of study. The study
also tries to find out those limitations (if any) of education which prevent it
developing as a distinct discipline. However, the study is not going to prove or
establish education as a discipline, instead, it explores the extent to which education
has developed itself as a discipline and what should be done for its future
development.

Education: As discussed earlier, the term is used in different sense. The present
study deals with education as a subject of study and research at different levels. As a
subject, it mainly deals with studying the process and systems of educating.

Discipline: Discipline is defined by the Oxford English Dictionary as "a branch of

learning or knowledge".28 A discipline is recognized by a certain distinctness it
reveals in its substance and methodology.

Analytical study: Analysis is a very dominant philosophical tendency. It involves

clarification and criticism of concepts, theories, and arguments. Analytical study is an
understanding of fundamental concepts, other related concepts, and interrelationship
between these concepts. There are many types of analyses. In the present study,
mainly critical analysis has been used.

13
1.9.0 Research Questions and Objectives of the study
1.9.1 Research Questions

The present study is an attempt to find out answers of the following questions:
What is meant by the term discipline?

How can a discipline be defined?

What are the general characteristics of a discipline?

What is the difference between discipline and other related terms?

How and when did disciplines evolve?

What criteria have been given at different times to characterize a body of

knowledge as a discipline?

To which extent do these criteria characterize a discipline adequately?

Do these criteria justifiably distinguish a discipline from a non-discipline?

Is it justified to evaluate all the bodies of knowledge on the same old criteria

in order to be recognized as a discipline?

What are the shortcomings/limitations (if any) of these criteria?

What modifications should be done in the existing criteria to make it equally

applicable to all the bodies of knowledge?

What should be ideal criteria to evaluate disciplinary status of different bodies

of knowledge justifiably?

Is it necessary for a body of knowledge to fulfill all of these criteria to be

recognized as a discipline?

How and when did discipline of education evolve and its institutional study as

a subject came into existence?

What are the objectives of studying education as a subject?

14
 To which extent does education fulfill the different criteria/ norms to be

recognized as a discipline?

How can we delineate subject matter, theories, research methods, terms and

concepts of education from its foundational disciplines?

What is the interrelationship between education and its foundational

disciplines?

Should education be considered only a dynamic aspect of its foundational

disciplines or a distinct discipline in its own right?

If education is a discipline then what is its status in academic world?

o Is education a developed discipline?

o Why it is generally considered undeveloped?

o Is it still developing?

o Is it worthy to be developed like a discipline?

o What is the status of study, Research and publication in academic

study of education?

o What is its academic, social and professional significance as a

discipline?

What are the reasons/ threats/limitations to develop education as a discipline/

distinct field of study?

What are the controversies associated with the academic status of education?

Which kind of discipline or a field of study it is?

Where does education stand in the disciplinary classification systems?

What are the unique features of education as a field of study?

How can education be developed as a distinct field of study or a discipline?

15
 In which direction should future development of education be based?

Should education be developed as a discipline only or beyond the traditional

boundaries of a discipline?

1.9.2 Objectives of the Study

Corresponding to the research questions, objectives of the present study are as
follows:
i. To understand and analyze the concept of a discipline.
ii. To study and review the criteria of a discipline.
iii. To analyze the discipline of education from the view of accepted criteria/
norms.
iv. To explore nature and future of education as a discipline/field of study.

1.10.0 Delimitations of the study

1. The present study does not claim to be an exhaustive exploration of the subject, nor
it is going to give any judgment over disciplinary status of education, rather it is a
systematic assembling and critical analysis of various opinions collected from
different sources and investigators own. The study is delimited to exploring
distinctness of education as a field of study.

2. The present study is delimited to studying education as an area of formal study and
research at various institutions. It does not deal with the process, systems and
levels of education.

1.11.0 Plan of the study

Corresponding to the objectives of the study the framework of the thesis has been
organized under 9 chapters:

Chapter -1 is introductory. It deals with the background of the problem, which covers
the meaning of education and debate over its disciplinary status. In addition, need and
importance of the study were discussed. The chapter also includes objectives and
delimitations of the study.
16
Chapter -2 reviews and analyzes the literature available in the concerned area and
draws out the extent and limitations of previously done work.

Chapter -3 discusses the methodology undertaken for the present study.

Chapter -4 deals with detailed account of meaning, evolution and classification of

academic disciplines. It covers the First objective.

Chapter -5 covers the second objective of the study. It reviews and analyzes the
criteria of a discipline in detail.

Chapter -6 deals with the third objective. It analyzes the disciplinary status of
education from the view of accepted criteria/norms.

Chapter -7 attempts to explore nature and future of education as a distinct field of

study. It covers the fourth and the last objective.

Chapter-8 discusses the findings, conclusion and implications of the present study. It
also puts forth limitations of the present research work and suggestions for future
research work.

Chapter -9 is the last chapter, which presents the summary of the study.

In this chapter the background, need, importance, objectives, and

delimitations of the study have been discussed. In the next chapter, the literature
related to the study will be reviewed and analyzed.

17
References

1. Quote retrieved June 02, 2013 from:

http://.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge
2. Methods of obtaining knowledge, Retrieved June 02, 2013 from:
http://.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methods_of_obtaining_knowledge
3. Sources of Knowledge, Retrieved June 02, 2013 from:
http://mrhoyestokwebsite.com/Knower/Useful%20Information/Sources%20of%2
0Knowledge.htm
4. D.J. McNeil, (1971). Knowledge and the curriculum, in George F. Kneller (Ed.)
Foundations of Education (3rd ed.), New York: John Wiley & Sons Incorporation,
p. 481.
5. R. Stichweh, (2001). History of Scientific Disciplines. in N.J. Smelser & P.B.
Baltes, (eds.). International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Oxford: Elsevier Science pp. 13727-13731.
6. M. Cookson, Academic Disciplines and Fields of Study, Retrieved December 12,
2009 from: Http://Classfolios.Org/Learningresource/Apaper.Html
7. Types of disciplines, Retrieved May 21, 2010 from:
http://en.wikipedia/wiki/academic_disciplnes
8. M.S. Yadav & T.K.S. Lakshmi (2003). Conceptual Inputs for Secondary Teacher
Education: The Instructional Role, NCTE, New Delhi, pp. 38-39.
9. N.R.S. Saxena & S. Chaturvedi (2005). Education in emerging Indian society,
Meerut: Surya Pub. p. 2
10. Education- meaning, retrieved May 21, 2012 from:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/education
11. S. Kumar & S. Ahmad, Meaning, Aims and Process of Education, Study material
B.A. Programme, School of Open Learning, University of Delhi, p.2. Retrieved
August 10, 2010 from:
https://sol.du.ac.in/Courses/UG/ StudyMaterial/16/Part1/ED/English/SM-1.pdf
12. S.P. Chaube & A. Chaube (2009). Philosophical and Sociological Foundations of
Education, Agra: Vinod Pustak Mandir, p. 25
13. Education Definition, Encyclopedia Britannica, 2008, Retrieved June 22, 2010,
from: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/179408 /education
18
14. R.S. Peters (1963). Comments on A discipline of education, In J. Walton and J.L.
Kuethe (Ed.) The Discipline of Education, Madison: University of Wisconsin
Press, pp.17-22.
15. C.E. Hughes (1963). Is Education a Discipline? In J. Walton and J.L. Kuethe
(Ed.) The Discipline of Education, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp.
147-158
16. J.B. Conant (1964). The Education of American Teachers, New York: McGraw-
Hill Book Company pp. 1-275.
17. R.G. Woods (Ed.) (1972), Education and its Disciplines, Unibooks, University of
London Press Ltd. pp. 1-119
18. J. Walton & J.L. Kuethe (Ed.) (1963). The Discipline of Education, Madison:
University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 1-187
19. J. Walton, (1971). Introduction to Education: A Substantive Discipline, Toronto:
Xerox Publishing Company. pp. 1-159
20. M. Belth (1965). Education as a Discipline: A Study of Role of Models in
Teaching, Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc. pp. 1-310
21. J.F Solitis (1968). An Introduction to the analysis of the educational concepts,
Massachusetts: Addison Wesley Pub Company.
22. M.S. Yadav & T.K.S Lakshmi, (May 1995). Education: Its Disciplinary Identity,
Journal of Indian Education, pp. 1-21
23. G. Biesta (2009). Disciplinarity and Interdisciplinarity in the Academic Study of
Education: Comparing Traditions of Educational Theorising, Retrieved May 19,
2010 from:
http://www.ioe.stir.ac.uk/documents/DisciplinarityandInterdisciplinarityintheAca
demicStudyofEducation_ComparingTraditionsofEduca.pdf.
24. S. Kumar (2012), Professor (Emeritus), M. S. University, Baroda, As said in a
discussion with researcher.
25. I. Palaiologou, (July 2010). The Death of a Discipline or the Birth of a
Transdiscipline: Subverting Questions of Disciplinarity within Education Studies
Undergraduate Courses, Educational Studies, V.36 No. 3, pp. 269-282, Retrieved
April 10, 2012 from: http://www.eric.ed.gov
26. U.C. Vashishtha, (January, 2010) Education: A Discipline in Making, DEI
FOERA, Third Annual Issue, Agra: Dayalbagh Educational Institute, pp. 19-21.
19
27. M. Belth (1965). Education as a Discipline, op. cit. p. ix.
28. Discipline- meaning Retrieved December 01, 2011 from:
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com

20