Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

Evangelista vs.

Collector of Internal Revenue

Facts: Petitioners borrowed money from their father and purchased several
lands. For several years, these lands were leased to tenants by the
petitioners. In 1954, respondent Collector of Internal Revenue demanded
from petitioners the payment of income tax on corporations, real estate
dealer's fixed tax and corporation residence tax for the years 1945-1949. A
letter of demand and correspondingassessments were delivered to
petitioners. Petitioners claim that they should be absolved from paying said
taxes since they are not a corporation.

Issue: Whether petitioners are subject to the tax on corporations provided


for in section 24 of Commonwealth Act. No. 466, otherwise known as the
National Internal Revenue Code, as well as to the residence tax for
corporations and the real estate dealers fixed tax.

Held: Yes. Petitioners are subject to the income tax and residence tax for
corporation.

As defined in section 84 (b) of the Internal Revenue Code, "the term


corporation includes partnerships, no matter how created or organized."
This qualifying expression clearly indicates that a joint venture need not be
undertaken in any of the standard forms, or in conformity with the
usual requirements of the law on partnerships, in order that one could be
deemed constituted for purposes of the tax on corporations. Partnership, as
has been defined in the civil code refers to two or more persons who bind
themselves to contribute money, properly, or industry to a common fund,
with the intention of dividing the profits among themselves. Thus,
petitioners, being engaged in the real estate transactions for monetary gain
and dividing the same among themselves constitute a partnership so far as
the Code is concerned and are subject to income tax for corporation.

Since Sec 2 of the Code in defining corporations also includes joint-stock


company, partnership, joint account, association or insurance company, no
matter how created or organized, it follows that petitioners, regardless of
how their partnership was created is also subject to the residence tax for
corporations.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi