Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
HELD: No. Plaintiff alleges that the promise to sell in the contract is reciprocally
demandable. While Rigos had really agreed, promised, and committed to sell
the land to Sanchez, Sanchez in turn had not agreed and committed himself to
buy the property. The instrument is not a contract to sell, but merely an option
for Sanchez to buy. As an option to buy there had been a price for the purchase
of the property, but there was nothing in the contract to indicate a promise and
undertaking supported by a consideration distinct from the purchase price for the
sale of the land, as required by Art. 1479 in a unilateral promise to sell. The
promisee having the burden of proving such consideration, Sanchez failed to
allege the existence of such in his complaint.