SUIT FOR COMPENSATION AGAINST COMMON CARRIER

IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT MUNSIFF AT TIRUCHIRAPPALLI

O.S.No. 293/2017

P.Reuben .Plaintiff

Vs.

Blue Dart Parcel Service (P) Ltd .Defendant

PLAINT FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 1 OF CPC FOR COMPENSATION

AGAINST COMMON CARRIER

The Plaintiff above named submits as follows:

1. The plaintiff, P. Reuben, son of Rajesh M, aged about 23 years and residing at plot no-
10, Dindigul Road Trichy-620009
2. The Address of the Plaintiff for service of all Notices and other processes from this
Court of Law is that of his Advocate Mr. A. Sharma, B.A.,LL.B (Hons), having his
office at No. 25 Kagalnagar, P.O Bistupur, Jamshedpur- 831001
3. The Defendant, Blue Dart Parcel Service (P) Ltd, residing at No 65, 10 th Cross,
Thillainagar, Trichy 620001, is also the address for service of all summons and
other notices from this Court of Law.
4. The plaintiff therefore states that the defendant had made a commitment to deliver a
package, containing 10 sets of glassware, to Anusha, daughter of Ramkumar, residing
at Plot no- 25, Kagalnagar, Jamshedpur-831011, from Trichy to Jamshedpur. Upon
delivery of the same, it was found out that 2 sets were missing. Hence, Blue Dart is
liable to provide compensation for the same.
5. The plaintiff states that the cause of action for this suit arose at Trichy on 10/4/2017
when the plaintiff paid a consideration of Rs 100 for delivery of a package containing
10 sets of glassware, to Anusha, daughter of Ramkumar, residing at Plot no- 25,
Kagalnagar, Jamshedpur-831011, from Trichy to Jamshedpur. The bill regarding the
same was furnished to the plaintiff in Trichy. Upon delivery of the package on
13/4/2017, it was discovered that 2 out of the 10 sets of glassware were missing, and
 to that effect, Blue Dart Parcel Service (P) Ltd. has failed in meeting its commitments
promised to the plaintiff.
6. The Plaintiff states that this Honble Court has jurisdiction to try the suit as the whole
cause of action arose at Trichy and values the suit at Rs. 12,000/- and pays thereon a
Court Fee of Rs../- as per Section 24 of The Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits
Valuation Act.
7. The Plaintiff therefore prays for a Judgment and Decree against the Defendant
i. in furnishing the 2 missing sets of glassware, or compensation for the same
ii. for further compensation for mental harassment, loss of wages suffered by the
Plaintiff due to the delivery of defected good
iii. for Costs of the suit
iv. for such other reliefs which the Plaintiff is entitled and which this Court deems to
be fit and proper in the interest of justice.

VERIFICATION

I, P. Reuben, the Plaintiff above named, do hereby verify and state that the
allegations/averments set out in Paras 1 to 5 are based on knowledge, what has been stated in
Para 6 is based on information and what has been stated in Para 7 is based on belief and that
the same is true.

(Signature of the plaintiff)