CROSSTABS

/TABLES=DURATION BY TYPE_OF_BAG
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ CC PHI LAMBDA UC
/CELLS=COUNT
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs
[DataSet0]

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
DURATION * 19 100.0% 0 0.0% 19 100.0%
TYPE_OF_BAG

DURATION * TYPE_OF_BAG Crosstabulation

Count
TYPE_OF_BAG
1.00 2.00 5.00 Total
DURATION 1.00 2 1 1 4
2.00 5 2 2 9
3.00 2 2 2 6
Total 9 5 5 19

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .727 a 4 .948

Likelihood Ratio .738 4 .947

Linear-by-Linear .198 1 .656
Association
N of Valid Cases 19

a. 9 cells (100.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.05.

Page 1
 Directional Measures
Asymptotic
Standard Error a
Value
Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .000 .000

DURATION Dependent .000 .000

TYPE_OF_BAG Dependent .000 .000

Goodman and Kruskal tau DURATION Dependent .022 .051

TYPE_OF_BAG Dependent .022 .051

Uncertainty Coefficient Symmetric .018 .042

DURATION Dependent .019 .043

TYPE_OF_BAG Dependent .018 .042

Directional Measures

d
Approximate T
Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .b

DURATION Dependent .b

TYPE_OF_BAG Dependent .b

Goodman and Kruskal tau DURATION Dependent

TYPE_OF_BAG Dependent

Uncertainty Coefficient Symmetric .436

DURATION Dependent .436

TYPE_OF_BAG Dependent .436

Page 2
 Directional Measures

Approximate
Significance
Nominal by Nominal Lambda Symmetric .b

DURATION Dependent .b

TYPE_OF_BAG Dependent .b

c
Goodman and Kruskal tau DURATION Dependent .938
c
TYPE_OF_BAG Dependent .937

e
Uncertainty Coefficient Symmetric .947
e
DURATION Dependent .947
e
TYPE_OF_BAG Dependent .947

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.
c. Based on chi-square approximation
d. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
e. Likelihood ratio chi-square probability.

Symmetric Measures
Approximate
Value Significance
Nominal by Nominal Phi .196 .948
Cramer's V .138 .948
Contingency Coefficient .192 .948
N of Valid Cases 19

Page 3