v e s te d inin ththee court c o u r t of o f the th e JuJurisdiction ris d ic tio n to to annul annul EEx. x . aa girl g irl marries m a rrie s aa ddomicile o m ic ile of o f the th e mman,a n , aalready lre a d y pparties a rtie s mmarried a rrie d to to ddetermines e te rm in e s ththee RRemedy: e m e d y : Annulment A n n u lm e n t ssomebody o m e b o d y else e ls e ththee cconsequences o n s e q u e n c e s ooff aany ny VVOIDABLE O ID A B L E MARRIAGE M A R R IA G E mmarriage a rria g e isis nnull u ll aand nd lelexx loci lo c i celebrationis c e le b r a tio n is ddefect e fe c t toto form fo rm aand nd vvoid. o id . (a(art. rt. 35,3 5 , No. N o . 4,4, ththee ssamea m e aapplies p p lie s FFamily a m ily Code).C o d e ). (o(off ththee marriage) m a rr ia g e ) wwith ith rereference fe re n c e toto OOrdinarily, rd in a rily, ththere e re isis ssubstantive u b s ta n tiv e oorr nnooo vnecessity ggoverning neer cn eins gs ityla wffff inintrinsic trin s ic vvalidity a lid ity DDISREGARD IS R E G A R D TTHIS H IS aasking s k in g for julaw fo r aa judicial d ic ia l BBOX. O X . DLI D L I LLANG A N G NAKO N A KO ddeclaration e c la r a tio n ththat a t the th e MMAA DDELETE ELETE wwith ith regard re g a rd to to mmarriage a rria g e isis vvoid, o id , andand nnational a tio n a l law la w of o f the th e ccapacity a p a c ity ooff ththee RRemedy: e m e d y : OOrdinarily, r d in a rily, ththerefore, e re fo r e , ththee girl g ir l pparties a rtie s pparties a r tie s toto marry m a rry ththere e r e isis nnoo need n e e d ooff aa ccan a n just ju s t go g o ahead ahead ddeclaration e c la r a tio n of o f nullity n u llity aand n d get g e t married m a r rie d to to ssomeone o m e o n e else e ls e VVOID O ID AABB ININITIO IT IO wwithout ith o u t inincurring c u r rin g aany ny MMARRIAGE A R R IA G E ccriminal r im in a l or o r cciviliv il EExcept: x c e p t: ifif aa party p a rty lia liability. b ility. (P(People e o p le vv wwants a n ts toto oobtain b ta in MMendoza, e n d o z a , L-5 L-5877, 877, ddamages a m a g e s bbecause e c a u s e ooff ssept. e p t. 28, 2 8 , 1954). 1 9 5 4 ). aa vvoid o id marriage. m a rria g e . HHowever, o w e v e r, sshould h o u ld she she ddesire e s ire toto oobtain b ta in ddamages a m a g e s fro from m ththee mman a n whow h o had had ddeluded e lu d e d hher e r into in to ththinking in k in g ththat a t hhee was was sstill till aa bbachelor, a c h e lo r, ththee oonly n ly way w a y she s h e can can lelegally g a lly force fo r c e hhim im to to ggive iv e hher e r aa mmonetary o n e ta ry ssettlement e ttle m e n t would w o u ld bbee toto go g o toto ccourt. o u r t. InIn ththee pproceeding ro c e e d in g wwhich h ic h sshe h e wwillill ininstitute, s titu te , the th e ccourt o u r t will w ill eexpressly x p r e s s ly oorr im p lic itly declare implicitly d e c la r e ththee marriage m a rr ia g e null n u ll aand n d void. v o id .
(A.C. No. 1928. August 3, 1978.) in The Matter of The IBP Membership Dues Delinquency of Atty. MARCIAL A. EDILLON (IBP Administrative Case No. MDD - 1) .