Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
3313 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106 (6), December 1999 0001-4966/99/106(6)/3313/4/$15.00 1999 Acoustical Society of America 3313
Downloaded 06 May 2013 to 146.232.129.75. Redistribution subject to ASA license or copyright; see http://asadl.org/terms
radiated in the forward and backward directions.
To overcome these difficulties, a second transducer was
built using a much simpler and more versatile design. This
transducer was constructed from a 44-in. 13 composite
piezoelectric panel constructed by Material Systems, Inc.
The panel is optimally designed to operate at 200 kHz but
can perform from several kHz to nearly 600 kHz. The panel
was etched such that there are four equal-area 22-in.
squares, each of which can be driven on a separate channel.
FIG. 1. Planes of constant phase for a wavefront containing a screw dislo- An acoustic backing was attached to one side of the panel to
cation helicoidal wavefront. The direction of propagation is indicated by minimize radiation in the backward direction and the entire
the arrow which runs along the axis of the beam. The phase is indeterminate system was encased in polyurethane. To produce the helicoi-
along the axis and there is a corresponding null in the magnitude.
dal wave, each section was driven with a tone burst and the
phase was chosen such that each quadrant was driven 90 out
which was stretched across the face of the ring. To produce of phase from the previous quadrant as shown in Fig. 2b.
the 2 phase shift about the axis of the beam, the ring and The phasing was then 0, 90, 180, and 270, instead of the
PVDF were cut at one point, which allowed the ring and continuous phase ramp as in the previous design. In the far-
transducer face to move like the coil of a spring. By offset- field of this transducer, this should produce an approximately
ting one side of the cut, the height of the ring face, and hence helicoidal wavefront.
the PVDF, becomes a continuous function of angle. If the The performance of the transducer was assessed in a
offset width, d, at the cut is chosen such that it is equal to the redwood tank of 8 ft diameter and 8 ft depth. The transducer
wavelength of the sound produced by the PVDF, the surface was placed 4 ft below the surface and 2 ft from the side of
height can then be described as z T /2 and the gener- the tank. The transducer panels were driven at 60 kHz with
ated beam should have the required angular dependence of 50-cycle tone bursts. An X Y positioning system was used
exp(i). To vary the offset, a screw was threaded into a to scan a plane perpendicular to the axis of the transducer
portion of the ring and the offset could be varied between 0 and 86 cm from the transducers face. A hydrophone, at-
and 10 mm, beyond which the ring would begin to bend out tached to the scanning system, recorded the phase and mag-
of the required helical shape. This sets the lower limit for the nitude of the acoustic field at 1-cm increments, the results of
operating frequency of the transducer at approximately which are displayed in Figs. 3a and 4. Although the beam
150 kHz. does not possess cylindrical symmetry, it does possess the
This transducer produced a beam having many of the required screw dislocation at its center. Close to the beam
characteristics of a helicoidal beam; however, the design had axis, the phase becomes helical in nature and at the axis it
several important limitations. Once the user set the offset becomes indeterminate. This produces the desired near-null
distance for the operating frequency of interest, the trans- in the magnitude of the beam along the axis. To demonstrate
ducer could only be used at that frequency. To change the that this null exists along the axis, even into the near-field of
frequency, the transducer would have to be physically re- the beam, the data in Figs. 3a and 4 were numerically back-
moved from its position and the offset would have to be propagated using acoustic holography techniques.14 Figure
manually reset. Also, because unbacked PVDF was used, the 3b shows the beam at 43 cm, half the distance to the trans-
transducer had a great deal of flexibility but it worked poorly ducer, and as expected the null along the axis is still present.
when used to receive sound. This transducer simultaneously Although the beam may become complicated as the propa-
gation distance is decreased, the null will still be present, as
is discussed in more detail below. It is interesting to note that
the screw dislocation at the center is not the only dislocation
present in the beam. There are also four prominent edge
dislocations,1 as can be seen in the phase distributions. At the
cores of these dislocations, the phase becomes indeterminate
as well and there are four corresponding nulls in the magni-
tude. Unlike the dislocation along the beam axis, these dis-
locations are not fixed and depend on the distance from the
transducer face.
With this design, the frequency of the output can be
changed as well as the helicity of the beam without disrupt-
FIG. 2. Schematic of the transducers used to generate helicoidal wavefronts.
ing the alignment of the transducer. Also, the transducer can
a In the ring transducer, the phase ramp required to produce the helicoidal be switched from operating with m1 to m0 where there
wave is introduced by the cut in the ring. When d, the height of the is no dislocation present in the beam. Unlike the previous
surface is described as z T /2 , where is the wavelength of the beam design, where it was possible to set dm, this transducer
and is the angle about the beam axis. b A four-panel 31 piezocompos-
cannot operate with m1, although this design could be gen-
ite transducer was driven such that each panel was 90 out of phase with the
previous panel. This gives the required 360 change in phase around the axis eralized to a larger number of panels or sections to produce
of the beam producing a helicoidal wavefront in the far-field. this type of beam. The piezocomposite material also works
3314 J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 106, No. 6, December 1999 B. T. Hefner and P. L. Marston: Acoustical helicoidal transducer 3314
Downloaded 06 May 2013 to 146.232.129.75. Redistribution subject to ASA license or copyright; see http://asadl.org/terms
FIG. 3. Output of the panel transducer operating at 60 kHz. a The normalized magnitude was measured in a plane perpendicular to the beams axis at a
distance of 86 cm from the transducer. The output is displayed on a decibel scale measured relative to the maximum response of the receiver. b The
magnitude and phase information was numerically backpropagated to 43 cm to confirm the existence of the axial null within the Rayleigh distance of the
transducer, R54.8 cm.
very well for receiving as well as transmission. This particu- presented in Fig. 3 was numerically backpropagated as in
lar transducer has been used for this type of application with Fig. 3b to track the existence of the null. For this scan, the
all of the panels connected; however, it has not been used to transducer was operated at 100 kHz and the sample plane
send and receive with each panel on a separate channel. was 95 cm from the transducer face. A cross section of these
There are several applications, such as scattering, for which backpropagation results corresponding to the x z plane is
this would be a very useful configuration. From symmetry given in Fig. 5. For the transducer operating at this fre-
considerations, specular reflections of an m1 beam from quency, the Rayleigh distance is taken to be R(1/2)ka 2
axisymmetric objects may be suppressed or enhanced using 54.8 cm, where a5.1 cm is the half-width of the trans-
the superposition of signals from appropriately phased ducer. As seen in Fig. 5, the null exists well within the Ray-
detectors.13 leigh distance of the transducer. Also, notice that the width
of the axial null decreases as one approaches the face of the
II. DISCUSSION transducer. By increasing the operating frequency, because
the null exists at all distances along the beams axis regard-
As mentioned above, this helicoidal beam may be a very less of the Rayleigh distance, the width of the null can be
useful tool for the alignment of sonar experiments or other
ultrasonic and underwater applications where objects need to
be placed along a common axis. The helicoidal beam pro-
duced a well-defined null along the axis of the beam which
exists in both the near- and far-fields. Its existence for the
particular transducer discussed above can be understood by
realizing that along the axis, the output of each panel inter-
feres destructively with the panel across from it. Regardless
of how complicated the overall structure of the beam may
become in the near-field, this interference should be main-
tained producing a continuous axial null. Using a hydro-
phone, the location of the axis could be found at the desired
distance from the transducer and then replaced by the target
to insure that the target is placed on the beam axis. A more
accurate method might be to use the transducer in a send and
receive mode and look at the specular reflection from the
target using the helicoidal beam. As noted previously, the
reflected signal would have the opposite helicity and if the
object is aligned with the axis, the received signal should be
suppressed. Furthermore, for axisymmetric targets the back- FIG. 4. The phase of the output measured in a plane perpendicular to the
beams axis at a distance of 86 cm from the transducer. At the center of the
scattered amplitude vanishes if measured on the axis.
beam the phase becomes indeterminate and comparison to Fig. 5 indicates
To further confirm the presence of a continuous null into that this corresponds to the location of the null in the magnitude of the wave
the near-field of the transducer, a scan similar to the one field.
3315 J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 106, No. 6, December 1999 B. T. Hefner and P. L. Marston: Acoustical helicoidal transducer 3315
Downloaded 06 May 2013 to 146.232.129.75. Redistribution subject to ASA license or copyright; see http://asadl.org/terms
Let (ip/ ) denote the complex velocity potential
and vRe be the fluid velocity where Re denotes
the real part. From Eq. 1, the azimuthal velocity is v
Re im /r . The average axial angular momentum den-
sity of the beam is ( )r v , where (c 2 )Re p is the
first-order change in density due to the acoustic wave and
denotes a time average. The angular momentum flux
L z and power P of the beam are
L z 2 c
0
r v r dr, 2
and
P2 0
Re p Re ik r dr, 3
3316 J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 106, No. 6, December 1999 B. T. Hefner and P. L. Marston: Acoustical helicoidal transducer 3316
Downloaded 06 May 2013 to 146.232.129.75. Redistribution subject to ASA license or copyright; see http://asadl.org/terms