Impact
Catastrophic
Van Dammes Lagoon Project
Ref # Subject/Risk
1 Survey
2 Issues with underground utility
Transportation, use, storage of
3 ground , hence it may have quiet a few
hazardous materials
Vegetation cleaning as a part of Site was inaccessible and was used as a
4 the construction and operation of dumping ground which is the major cause
parking or site clearance.
5 Archaeological Discovery
Primary road or mototrway near the
6 Transportation mismanagement construction site can cause transportation
delays and mismanagement.
Unexpected ground/land
7 differ from those indicated in ground
conditions
8 Site Flooding
Staffing delays due to lack of
9 A
labour
10 Concrete Washout
Number of Closed risks
Total risks identified
Impact
Catastrophic
Substantial
Substantial
Significant
Significant
Moderate
Moderate
Minor
Minor
Risk Matrix Risk Matrix
Likelihood 1 2 3 4 5 Likelihood 1 2 3 4 5
REVISION DATE Improbable - 1 in 1000 1 G G G A R Improbable - 1 in 1000 1 G G G A R
Unlikely - 1 in 100 2 G G A A R Unlikely - 1 in 100 2 G G A A R
Possible - 1 in 10 3 G A A R R Possible - 1 in 10 3 G A A R R
PRINT DATE Likely - more than not 4 A A R R R Likely - more than not 4 A A R R R
Probable - almost certain 5 A R R R R Probable - almost certain 5 A R R R R
Inherent Ranking (Before Mitigation) Residual Ranking (After Mitigation)
Likelihood Assessment
Likelihood Assessment
Closed Impact Assessment Rating (1 to 5) Impact Assessment Rating (1 to 5)
Additional Rating
Additional Rating
Control Measures (who, what action, how frequent, how evidenced)
Maximum Impact
Maximum Impact
Rating (1 to 5)
Quality / Perform
Quality / Perform
Rating (1 to 5)
Rating (1 to 5)
Constructability
Constructability
Health & Safety
Health & Safety
Active
Environment
Environment
Matrix Zone
Matrix Zone
(1 to 5)
Rating
Programme
Programme
Party/Legal
Party/Legal
Reputation
Reputation
Causes Consequences
Third
Third
Cost
Cost
Status Cause (preventative) Controls Consequence (reactive) Controls
Onsite review is expected from the land surveyors,
Improper site build, not in compliance,
regulatory review of plats. Survey companis both
unfamilarity with active equipment Citation and/or delay in obtaining needed permits, injury, Investigate the cause and reworks must be done
A 2 0 0 4 4 2 0 4 2 A 4 5 existing contractors should have a prior experience. 2 0 0 2 2 1 0 3 1 A 3 4
including tools & equipment evaluations, exposure to combustable gases or liquids by various contractors and person concerned.
Verify with land regulatory department to confirm
unqualified contractor.
latest plats.
Due inaccurate underground survey of It can cause damage to underground service utilities and can Ensure proper survey of underground service Provide medical assisstance to those effected.
utility lines and placement of service lines A result into major accident if any gas or electrical lines are 3 4 0 3 3 0 0 3 4 R 4 5 utilities with proper collaboration with service Immediate fixing of utilities by experienced 1 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 3 G 2 4
during construction. damaged. consultants . engineer to avoid disruption of services.
Since the site was used as dumping Spills from transport, storage or use of hazardous materials Transport, use and storage of hazardous materials as Isolation of the site. Clear site immediately and
A giving rise to impacts on ground water quality and health related 3 4 4 2 3 0 0 2 4 R 4 5 per standard procedures outlined in relevant NZ provide medical assistance to effect people. 2 3 3 1 2 0 0 1 3 A 3 4
hazardous substances. risks. standards. Follow NZ standards for further procedures.
Clearing undertaken in accordance with an Erosion
and Sediment Control Plan, which will describe
Loss of connectivity within the site due to growth of landscapes.
erosion and sediment controls and monitoring Removal of alkalinity , improve quality of soil
Erosion and sedimentation, and associated impacts on surface
A 2 2 3 2 3 0 3 0 0 A 3 4 requirements. and incorporate measures to increase ground 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 G 2 3
water quality (impacts on values in relation to aquatic biology,
of growth of wild vegetation. Construction of appropriate drainage and sediment water discharge.
drinking water and aesthetics).
control measures to manage runoff and treat
sediment-laden waters.
Delay in construction schedule or relocation of project due to
NZ is deeply rooted to cultural heritage Proper investigation and consultation needs to be Various provisions needs to be done inorder to
discovery of artifacts. It can increase the cost of programme as
and hence discovery of any archaelogical A 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 2 2 R 5 5 done with NZ archaelogical department prior to the move those artifacts from site to respective places 3 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 A 3 3
highly skilled people are required to remove the artifacts which
site is inevitable. starting of construction. and resume to the schedule as soon as possible.
can cause delay in project time as well.
The construction manager needs to inform auckland
Investigation of incident, proper training of traffic
Traffic delays can result to delay in material precurement. It can transport in advance regarding any traffic issues that
A 3 4 0 3 4 0 3 2 0 R 4 5 controllers and installation of proper raod 2 3 0 2 4 0 3 1 0 A 4 5
cause accidents near/at site if proper safety signs arent placed. might cause traffic dealys in future. Traffic
signages needs to be done.
controlers need to be well informed.
Site work should be stopped immediately.
Monitor works in progress. Use experienced staff on
Ground conditions ecountered on site Experienced architects and site engineers need to
Construction delays, design review required with possible site. Ensure that site staff are aware of the results of
A 2 0 3 3 4 0 3 0 0 A 4 5 review the construction and make changes 1 0 2 2 3 0 2 0 0 G 2 4
changes in design which can increase project cost and timescale . ground investigation and the basis of the design of
projection investigation accordingly inorder to cover project cost and
permanent works.
time.
One should ensure that cut off drains are installed
NZ has unexpected weather , prolonged
Site work can stop which can increase the cost of project and Weather forecast should be monotored daily and and proper covering should be done to electric
rains can cause rise in ground water
A delays time. Heavy rainfall can damage permanent works and 3 0 3 2 2 0 2 0 0 R 4 4 weekly activities should be organised in accordance machineries and open wires. Senior consultants 2 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 G 2 3
discharge which can force water courses
can take a lot time to make repairs. with that. should check proper functioning of tools and
to break their banks.
machines .
Delay in project completion due to lack of labour which results Have active dialog with labourts, understand their Hire labours from various sub contractors,
Low pay scale from concerned
in increase in project budget due to hiring from various sub 3 0 0 3 3 2 0 3 2 R 4 4 needs and aspirations, make them content and take negotiate with company labour and try to 2 0 0 2 2 1 0 2 1 G 2 3
consultants, high no. of labour lay-offs.
contractors. Company reputation can be damaged. utmost care of labour safety. introduce contigency time .
Prior giving grant to concrete truck drivers, they
must be informed about the location of washout. Site
Since concrete is a toxic waste hence it has many health and
engineer must allocate a place suitable for washout, Instant removal of concrete slurry from washout
Piling, casting, after placing of concrete environmenatal hazards which can cause serious problems to
A 2 4 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 A 4 5 and where additional cement elements are readily area. Provision of proper PPE for workers 1 3 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 G 1 2
in concourse , piers etc. workers working on site. It can damage the top soil as well which
available.During pre-pour of concrete examination , handling the slurry as its a toxic waste.
needs to be replaced .
site engineers must incorporate the prediction of
concrete washout.
0 9 1
#REF! #REF!
0
Number of Inherent Red risks 6.0 Number of Residual Red risks 0.0
CHANGE IN RISK
7.0
Number of Inherent Amber risks 4.0 6.0 Inherent risks Number of Residual Amber risks 4.0
Residual risks
5.0
Number of Inherent Green risks 0.0 Number of Residual Green risks 6.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
Inherent Red risks as % of total #REF! Residual Red risks as % of total #REF!
1.0
Inherent Amber risks as % of total #REF! 0.0 Residual Amber risks as % of total #REF!
Red Amber
Green
Inherent Green risks as % of total #REF! Residual Green risks as % of total #REF!
Average reduction in risk as % using matrix system of calculation #REF!
Average reduction in risk as % using numeric system of calculation #REF!
Residual risks remaining >3 as a % 11.1
Page 1 of 1