1 50 / 167

Material to categorize

Logic for Lawyers a Guide to Clear Legal Thinking.

Ruggero J. Aldisert - 1989

Formal Legal Reasoning in Philosophy of Law Logic and Philosophy of Logic

Logic and Philosophy of Logic, Miscellaneous in Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Philosophy of Law, General Works in Philosophy of Law

Remove from this list Export citation My bibliography

Legal Reasoning: Arguments From Comparison.

Thomas Coendet - 2016 - Archiv Fuer Rechts Und Sozialphilosphie 102 (4):476-
507.

Formal Legal Reasoning in Philosophy of Law

Remove from this list Direct download Export citation My bibliography

Formalism about Legal Reasoning

On Law and Logic.

Carlos E. Alchourron - 1996 - Ratio Juris 9 (4):331-348.

The main purpose of this paper is to explore the role played by logic in the
legal domain. In the traditional conception which underlies the movement of
codification, judges are able to find in the legal system (the Master System) a
unique answer for every legal problem. This entails its completeness,
consistency and the possibility of deriving from it the contents of all judicial
decisions. Although the ideal model of this conception is supported by
important theoretical and political ideals, it (...)

Formal Models of Legal Reasoning in Philosophy of Law Formalism about Legal

Reasoning in Philosophy of Law Latin American Philosophy of Science, Logic,
and Mathematics in Philosophy of the Americas Legal Reasoning and
Adjudication, Misc in Philosophy of Law

Remove from this list Direct download (5 more) Export citation My

bibliography 1 citation

Logic Without Truth.

Carlos E. Alchourron & Antonio A. Martino - 1990 - Ratio Juris 3 (1):46-67.

Deontic Logic in Logic and Philosophy of Logic Formalism about Legal
Reasoning in Philosophy of Law Latin American Philosophy of Science, Logic,
and Mathematics in Philosophy of the Americas

Remove from this list Direct download (6 more) Export citation My

bibliography 2 citations

The Problematic Value of Mathematical Models of Evidence.

Ronald J. Allen & Michael S. Pardo - manuscript

Legal scholarship exploring the nature of evidence and the process of juridical
proof has had a complex relationship with formal modeling. As evident in so
many fields of knowledge, algorithmic approaches to evidence have the
theoretical potential to increase the accuracy of fact finding, a tremendously
important goal of the legal system. The hope that knowledge could be
formalized within the evidentiary realm generated a spate of articles
attempting to put probability theory to this purpose. This literature was both
insightful (...)

Evidence and Proof in Law in Philosophy of Law Formalism about Legal

Reasoning in Philosophy of Law

Remove from this list Direct download Export citation My bibliography

4 citations

An Interpretation of Probability in the Law of Evidence Based on Pro-Et-Contra

Argumentation.

Lennart qvist - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (4):391-410.

The purpose of this paper is to improve on the logical and measure-theoretic

foundations for the notion of probability in the law of evidence, which were
given in my contributions qvist [ (1990) Logical analysis of epistemic modality:
an explication of the BoldingEkelf degrees of evidential strength. In: Klami HT
(ed) Rtt och Sanning (Law and Truth. A symposium on legal proof-theory in
Uppsala May 1989). Iustus Frlag, Uppsala, pp 4354; (1992) Towards a logical
theory of legal evidence: semantic analysis (...)

Conceptual Analysis in Jurisprudence in Philosophy of Law Evidence and Proof

in Law in Philosophy of Law Formalism about Legal Reasoning in Philosophy of
Law Interpretation of Probability in Philosophy of Probability Scientific Method in
General Philosophy of Science

Remove from this list Direct download (5 more) Export citation My

bibliography 2 citations

Semantically Cued Contextual Implicatures in Legal Texts.

Sol Azuelos-Atias - 2010 - Journal of Pragmatics 42 (3):728-743.

In this article I discuss one of the linguistic means which enables speakers to
represent content in their utterances without expressing it explicitly. I will
argue, in line with Wilson and Sperber, that the logical form of the argument
encoded by an utterance (however fragmentarily or incompletely) is sufficient
as a cue directing the hearers to the implicit content of the speaker's meaning.
I will suggest that the logical form of the encoded argument enables the
speaker to represent in the (...)

Formalism about Legal Reasoning in Philosophy of Law Law and Language in

Philosophy of Law Relevance Theory in Philosophy of Language Truth-
Conditional Theories in Philosophy of Language

Remove from this list Translate Direct download Export citation My

bibliography 3 citations

Argument in Artificial Intelligence and Law.

Trevor Bench-Capon - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 (4):249-261.

In this paper I shall discuss the notion of argument, and the importanceof
argument in AI and Law. I shall distinguish four areas where argument hasbeen
applied: in modelling legal reasoning based on cases; in thepresentation and
explanation of results from a rule based legal informationsystem; in the
resolution of normative conflict and problems ofnon-monotonicity; and as a
basis for dialogue games to support the modellingof the process of argument.
The study of argument is held to offer prospectsof real progress (...)

Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, Misc in Philosophy of Cognitive Science Formal

Models of Legal Reasoning in Philosophy of Law Formalism about Legal
Reasoning in Philosophy of Law Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence,
Miscellaneous in Philosophy of Cognitive Science

Remove from this list Direct download (4 more) Export citation My

bibliography 3 citations

Try to See It My Way: Modelling Persuasion in Legal Discourse. [REVIEW]

Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (4):271-287.

In this paper I argue that to explain and resolve some kinds of disagreement we
need to go beyond what logic alone can provide. In particular, following
Perelman, I argue that we need to consider how arguments are ascribed
different strengths by different audiences, according to how accepting these
arguments promotes values favoured by the audience to which they are
addressed. I show how we can extend the standard framework for modelling
argumentation systems to allow different audiences to be represented. (...)

Formalism about Legal Reasoning in Philosophy of Law

Remove from this list Direct download (8 more) Export citation My

bibliography 1 citation

Using Argument Schemes for Hypothetical Reasoning in Law.

Trevor Bench-Capon & Henry Prakken - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 18
(2):153-174.

This paper studies the use of hypothetical and value-based reasoning in US

Supreme-Court cases concerning the United States Fourth Amendment.
Drawing upon formal AI & Law models of legal argument a semi-formal
reconstruction is given of parts of the Carney case, which has been studied
previously in AI & law research on case-based reasoning. As part of the
reconstruction, a semi-formal proposal is made for extending the formal AI &
Law models with forms of metalevel reasoning in several argument schemes.
(...)

Formal Models of Legal Reasoning in Philosophy of Law Formalism about Legal

Reasoning in Philosophy of Law

Remove from this list Direct download (7 more) Export citation My

bibliography 6 citations