0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
11 vues1 page
A confounding variable is a variable that provides an alternative explanation for the relationship between the independent and dependent variables, threatening the internal validity of the results. It can falsely show a correlation between the variables and lead to an incorrect rejection of the null hypothesis. To avoid confounding variables, researchers must design experiments to randomly assign participants to conditions and ensure the independent variable is the sole cause of any effects. Researchers can also collect demographic data to evaluate potential confounding or include multiple outcome measures to strengthen conclusions. Improving the experimental design can further help avoid confounding variables from influencing the results.
A confounding variable is a variable that provides an alternative explanation for the relationship between the independent and dependent variables, threatening the internal validity of the results. It can falsely show a correlation between the variables and lead to an incorrect rejection of the null hypothesis. To avoid confounding variables, researchers must design experiments to randomly assign participants to conditions and ensure the independent variable is the sole cause of any effects. Researchers can also collect demographic data to evaluate potential confounding or include multiple outcome measures to strengthen conclusions. Improving the experimental design can further help avoid confounding variables from influencing the results.
A confounding variable is a variable that provides an alternative explanation for the relationship between the independent and dependent variables, threatening the internal validity of the results. It can falsely show a correlation between the variables and lead to an incorrect rejection of the null hypothesis. To avoid confounding variables, researchers must design experiments to randomly assign participants to conditions and ensure the independent variable is the sole cause of any effects. Researchers can also collect demographic data to evaluate potential confounding or include multiple outcome measures to strengthen conclusions. Improving the experimental design can further help avoid confounding variables from influencing the results.
Confounding variable. A variable is considered to be confounding because it
provides an alternative explanation for your results; that is, an alternative explanation for the relationship or differences between the variables and/or groups that you are measuring. This threatens the internal validity of your results. A confounding variable, also known as a third variable or a mediator variable, can adversely affect the relation between the independent variable and dependent variable. This may cause the researcher to analyze the results incorrectly. The results may show a false correlation between the dependent and independent variables, leading to an incorrect rejection of the null hypothesis. For example the relationship between the force applied to a ball and the distance the ball travels. The natural prediction would be that the ball given the most force would travel furthest. However, if the confounding variable is a downward slanted piece of wood to help propel the ball, the results would be dramatically different. The slanted wood is the confounding variable that changes the outcome of the experiment.
To avoid having confounded variables, it is important to take possible bias into
account, to make sure participants are assigned randomly to experimental conditions and to verify that the independent variable is the sole element that can be causing the effect. Several approaches can be taken to avoid losing validity due to confounded variables. Naturally, the best approach is to design the experiment such that confounding variables are avoided. When this is not possible, other precautions can be taken that would allow the researcher to draw valid conclusions. First, one can use demographic data to measure possible confounding. When conducting a user study, it is useful to collect additional demographic data so that expected confounding can be objectively evaluated. However, if experimental groups do not differ on these measures, the study is strengthened. A second approach to avoid making conclusions based on confounded variables is to include complementary outcome measures in the study. A third approach is to improve the design to avoid possible confounding.1
1 Essay submitted to department of science of language, communication and arts, English
course in practical fulfillment of subject (MEIC) Hermenegildo da Helena Nicolau. MEA. MBA.
[Cultural and Historical Perspectives On Science education] Susan A. Kirch, Michele Amoroso (auth.) - Being and Becoming Scientists Today_ Reconstructing Assumptions about Science and Science Education to Reclaim a .pdf