Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DESIGN THEORY AND PROCEDURE
NOTATION
8.2 FLEXURE
8.2.1 Allowable Stress Design (ASD)
8.2.1.1 Theory
8.2.1.1.1 Stage 1 Loading
8.2.1.1.2 Stage 2 Loading
8.2.1.1.3 Stage 3 Loading
8.2.1.1.4 Stage 4 Loading
8.2.1.1.5 Stage 5 Loading
8.2.1.1.5.1 Tensile Stresses - Normal Strength Concrete
8.2.1.1.5.2 Tensile Stresses - High Strength Concrete
8.2.1.1.5.3 Tensile Stresses - LRFD Specifications
8.2.1.2 Allowable Concrete Stresses
8.2.1.2.1 Standard Specifications
8.2.1.2.2 LRFD Specifications
8.2.1.3 Design Procedure
8.2.1.4 Composite Section Properties
8.2.1.4.1 Theory
8.2.1.4.2 Procedure
8.2.1.5 Harped Strand Considerations
8.2.1.6 Debonded Strand Considerations
8.2.1.7 Minimum Strand Cover and Spacing
8.2.1.8 Design Example
8.2.1.8.1 Design Requirement 1
8.2.1.8.2 Design Requirement 2
8.2.1.8.3 Design Requirement 3
8.2.1.8.3.1 Strand Debonding
8.2.1.8.3.2 Harped Strands
8.2.1.8.3.3 Other Methods to Control Stresses
8.2.1.8.4 Design Requirement 4
8.2.1.9 Fatigue
JUL 03
JUL 03
8.4 SHEAR
8.4.1 Standard Specifications
8.4.1.1 Flexure-Shear Strength, Vci
8.4.1.2 Web-Shear Strength, Vcw
8.4.1.3 Web Reinforcement Contribution, Vs
8.4.1.3.1 Minimum Spacing Requirements
8.4.1.3.2 Minimum Shear Reinforcement
8.4.1.4 Application of Standard Specifications to Continuous Spans
8.4.2 1979 Interim Revisions
8.4.3 LRFD Specifications
8.4.3.1 Shear Design Provisions
8.4.3.1.1 Nominal Shear Resistance
8.4.3.1.2 Concrete Contribution, Vc
8.4.3.1.3 Web Reinforcement Contribution, Vs
8.4.3.1.4 Values of and
8.4.3.2 Design Procedure
8.4.3.3 Longitudinal Reinforcement Requirement
8.4.4 Comparison of Shear Design Methods
JUL 03
8.14 REFERENCES
JUL 03
JUL 03
JUL 03
JUL 03
fpc = compressive stress in concrete after all prestress losses have occurred
either at the centroid of the cross-section resisting live load or at
the junction of the web and flange when the centroid lies in the
flange. In a composite section, fpc is the resultant compressive
stress at the centroid of the composite section, or at the junction
of the web and flange when the centroid lies within the flange,
due to both prestress and to the bending moments resisted by the
precast member acting alone. [LRFD]
fpe = compressive stress in concrete due to effective pretension
forces only (after allowance for all pretension losses) at
extreme fiber of section where tensile stress is caused by
externally applied loads [STD]
fpe = effective stress in the pretensioning steel after losses [LRFD]
fpi = initial stress immediately before transfer
fpj = stress in the pretensioning steel at jacking [LRFD]
fpo = stress in the pretensioning steel when the stress in the
surrounding concrete is zero [LRFD]
fps = average stress in pretensioning steel at the time for which the
nominal resistance of member is required [LRFD]
fpu = specified tensile strength of pretensioning steel [LRFD]
fpy = yield strength of pretensioning steel [LRFD]
fr = modulus of rupture of concrete [STD], [LRFD]
fs = allowable stress in steel under service loads
f s = ultimate stress of pretensioning reinforcement [STD]
fse = effective final pretension stress
fsi = effective initial pretension stress
f *su = average stress in pretensioning steel at ultimate load [STD]
f(tj) = stress at time tj
fr(t,t0) = relaxation stress at a certain time
f(t0) = tensile stress at the beginning of the interval
fy = yield strength of reinforcing bars [STD]
fy = specified minimum yield strength of reinforcing bars [LRFD]
fy = yield stress of pretensioning reinforcement [STD]
f y = specified minimum yield strength of compression reinforcement [LRFD]
fyh = specified yield strength of transverse reinforcement [LRFD]
H = average annual ambient mean relative humidity [LRFD]
h = length of a single segment
h = overall depth of precast beam [STD]
h = overall depth of a member [LRFD]
hcg = height of center of gravity of beam above road
hd = deck thickness
hf = compression flange depth [LRFD]
hr = height of roll center above road
I = moment of inertia about the centroid of the non-composite
precast beam, major axis moment of inertia of beam [STD], [LRFD]
JUL 03
JUL 03
JUL 03
JUL 03
Vuh = factored horizontal shear force per unit length of the beam [LRFD]
vu = average factored shear stress [LRFD]
W = total weight of beam
w = a uniformly distributed load [LRFD]
w = width of clear roadway [LRFD]
w = weight per unit length of beam
wc = unit weight of concrete [STD], [LRFD]
x = distance from the support to the section under question
y = height of center of gravity of beam above roll axis
(beam supported from below)
yb = distance from centroid to the extreme bottom fiber of the
non-composite beam
ybc = distance from centroid to the bottom of beam of the composite section
ybs = distance from the center of gravity of strands to the bottom
fiber of the beam
yk = distance of the centroid of element k from edge
yr = height of roll axis above center of gravity of beam (hanging beam)
ys = height above soffit of centroid of prestressing force
yt = distance from centroid to the extreme top fiber of the
non-composite beam
ytc = distance from centroid to the top of deck of the composite section
z = lateral deflection of center of gravity of beam
zmax = distance from centerline of vehicle to center of dual tires
z o = theoretical lateral deflection of center of gravity of beam with the
full dead weight applied laterally
z o = theoretical lateral deflection of center of gravity of beam with the
full dead weight applied laterally, computed using Ieff for tilt angle
under consideration
= super-elevation angle or tilt angle of support in radians
= factor used in calculating elastic shortening loss
= coefficient defined by (Eq. 8.6.2.5.1-3) to account for interaction
between steel and concrete in pretensioning loss calculations
s = angle between compressive strut and adjoining tension tie [LRFD]
= factor indicating ability of diagonally cracked concrete to
transmit tension (a value indicating concrete contribution) [LRFD]
1 = factor for concrete strength [STD]
1 = ratio of the depth of the equivalent uniformly stressed compression
zone assumed in the strength limit state to the depth of the actual
compression zone [LRFD]
c = time-dependent multiplier
= deflection
= camber measured with respect to the beam-ends
JUL 03
JUL 03
k = curvature of element k
0 = curvature at support
= parameter used to determine friction coefficient [LRFD]
= Poissons ratio for beams [STD]
= coefficient of friction [LRFD]
= angle of inclination of diagonal compressive stresses [LRFD]
= roll angle of major axis of beam with respect to vertical
L = left end rotation of beam due to simple span loads
R = right end rotation of beam due to simple span loads
i = initial roll angle of a rigid beam
max = tilt angle at which cracking begins, based on tension at the top corner
equal to the modulus of rupture
max = tilt angle at maximum factor of safety against failure
b = reinforcement ratio producing balanced strain condition [STD]
* = ratio of pretensioning reinforcement [STD]
= a factor that reflects the fact that the actual relaxation is less than
the intrinsic relaxation
= aging coefficient
(t,t0) = aging coefficient at certain time
JUL 03
8.3 The transfer length, lt, is the length of strand over which the prestress force in pre-
STRAND TRANSFER tensioned members is transferred to the concrete by bond and friction. The develop-
AND DEVELOPMENT ment length, ld, is the length of strand required to develop the stress in the strand
LENGTHS corresponding to the full flexural strength of the member. The transfer length is
included as part of the development length. These two parameters are used differ-
ently in design as discussed below. Figure 8.3-1 illustrates the relationship between
the transfer and development lengths, and the strand stress.
Figure 8.3-1
Strand Transfer and
Development Lengths
Stresses in the
prestressing strand
Ultimate stress in
prestressing strand, fpu
Effective stress
after all losses, fpe
Transfer length, lt
Development length, ld
Much research has been conducted in recent years on methods of predicting lt and
ld. Prediction formulas have been developed with no clear consensus among research-
ers. It should be emphasized, however, that the impact of variability of the transfer
length on design of bridge beams is very small, and is limited to the 2 to 3 ft at the
end of a member. The impact of variability of development length on bridge beams is
also small. An over-estimation of ld will not significantly increase the cost of beams.
However, ld may become a significant design parameter for some prestressed concrete
members, such as deck panels, which have very short spans, and piles, which may
have their largest bending moment at the pile/cap interface.
8.3.1
Strand Transfer Length
8.3.1.1 Transfer length is the bonded length of strand required to transfer the prestress force
Impact on Design in the strand to the surrounding concrete in a pretensioned member. At any section
which falls within the transfer length, the prestress force should be reduced in pro-
portion to its distance from the end of the member. Specifically, within the transfer
length, the stress in the strand is assumed to vary linearly from zero at the end of
member, or the point where the strand is bonded if debonding is used, to the full
effective prestress force at the end of the transfer length.
JUL 03
Overestimation of transfer length is generally conservative for shear design but may be
unconservative in flexural design of the end regions. Shear strength is reduced within the
transfer length due to the reduced precompression in the concrete. On the other hand,
the reduced prestress force in the transfer length zone protects the end of the beam from
excessive tensile stresses. Such excessive stresses may require that the end of the beam be
reinforced with additional bonded steel reinforcement near the top fibers.
8.3.1.2 STD Article 9.20.2.4 states that the transfer length be equal to 50 times the diameter
Specifications of the strand while LRFD Article 5.8.2.3 requires a transfer length of 60 times the
diameter of the strand.
8.3.1.3 The transfer length for prestressing strand is affected by many parameters. Some of
Factors Affecting the most important are:
Transfer Length
type of prestressing strand
strand diameter
strand stress level
surface condition of strand (i.e., clean, oiled, rusted, epoxy-coated, etc.)
concrete strength
type of loading (i.e., static, repeated or impact)
method of strand detensioning (i.e., gradual or sudden)
confining reinforcement around strand
consolidation and consistency of concrete around strand
concrete cover around the strand
strand spacing
time-dependent effects
vertical location in concrete (top versus bottom locations)
8.3.1.4 The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), in 1996, approved the use of 1/2-in.-
Research Results diameter strands at a center-to-center spacing of 1.75 in. and 0.6-in.-diameter strands
at a spacing of 2 in. These spacings are less than the 4 strand diameters previously
required in the Standard Specifications. This decision was based on studies, which
demonstrate that the transfer length for the more closely spaced strands remains con-
servatively estimated using the relationship found in the Standard Specifications. The
use of 0.6-in. strand in pretensioned bridge members, (which had earlier been pro-
hibited by FHWA), and especially its use at the reduced spacing of 2 in., is expected
to substantially increase the use of 0.6-in.-diameter strands. With only a 20% increase
in diameter from 0.5 to 0.6-in., the prestress force per strand is increased by 40%.
Using 0.6-in. strands at a 2 in. spacing, it is possible now to increase the amount of
pretensioning force by up to 40% and still preserve the same prestress eccentricity.
This will dramatically improve the load carrying capacity of a given cross-section. For
more information on this research, see Section 8.3.2.4.
8.3.1.5 The current recommendations of the Standard and the LRFD Specifications to use
Recommendations 50 or 60 strand diameters are adequate for design of typical structures. For unusu-
ally short span products or for strands with marginal surface conditions, this transfer
length may not be adequate. For high strength concrete, the provisions in both speci-
fications may overestimate the transfer length.
JUL 03
8.3.1.6 The Standard Specifications and the LRFD Specifications have essentially the same
End Zone Reinforcement requirements for providing vertical reinforcement near the ends of pretensioned
members. Both require that an area of mild reinforcing steel be provided to resist 4%
of the prestressing force. The stress in the mild reinforcement resisting this force, is
limited to 20,000 psi. This reinforcement is usually provided as stirrups and must be
placed within a distance equal to h/4 from the beam end, where h is the overall depth
of the pretensioned element.
The origin of this requirement is not well known. It appears to be reasonable for
modest levels of prestressing. However, in recent years, larger prestressing forces are
being used with high performance concrete. This is especially true for sections such
as the NU Bulb-Tee beams*, where up to 58 strands can be placed in the bottom
flange. When this large number of strands is used with relatively shallow beams, such
as the 43.3 in. deep NU-1100, the specifications require that as much as 3.6 in.2 of
reinforcement be placed within a distance of 9.0 in. from the end of the beam. It is
very difficult to satisfy this requirement and provide adequate clearance to place and
consolidate the concrete.
Until this issue is investigated further, designers should be aware that the most critical
time is the time of prestress release. Areas of end zone reinforcement that are less than
the required areas and that have been consistently used in actual production without
objectionable cracking at member end should be acceptable.
* a family of metric-dimensioned beams developed at the University of Nebraska
8.3.2
Strand Development
Length
8.3.2.1 Strand development length is the length required for bond to develop the strand
Impact on Design tension at ultimate flexure. As shown in Section 8.2.2, this tension is generally lower
than the specified ultimate strength of the strand and may be as low as its yield point.
For bridge beams, the development length is insignificant unless the bridge beams
are less than about 24 ft in length, or unless the beams are subjected to large bending
moments near their ends. The development length becomes significant in deck panels
used as stay-in-place forms.
8.3.2.2 Equations for development length were based on tests performed on normal weight
Standard Specifications concrete. The Standard Specifications require that the strand be embedded beyond
the critical section for a distance of at least the development length, which can be
computed by the equation:
2 [STD Eq. 9-42]
ld = f ps f pe d b
3
where
fps = average stress in prestressing steel at ultimate load
fpe = effective stress in the prestressing steel after losses
db = nominal strand diameter
The Standard Specifications require that debonded strands be designed for twice the
development length of bonded strands. This requirement appears to be unnecessarily
conservative. However, it should be followed until research justifies its modification.
JUL 03
When the critical section occurs at a location where the full development length is
not available because of proximity to the end of the member, the available stress in
the strand must be reduced. The Standard Specifications provide the following equa-
tion for computing the available stress for such a condition:
lx 2
f su* = + f pe [STD Eq. 9-19]
db 3
where lx is the distance from the critical section to the end of the prestressing strand
and fpe is in ksi.
8.3.2.3 The equation for development length in the LRFD Specifications is very similar to the
LRFD Specifications Standard Specifications. However, based on work by Cousins et al. (1986) indicating
that the existing equation was unconservative, the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) imposed a 1.6 multiplier on the AASHTO equation. As a result, the LRFD
Specifications include a K factor in the equation as follows:
2
ld K f ps f pe d b [LRFD Eq. 5.11.4.2-1]
3
where
K = 1.6 for bonded strands in precast, prestressed beams
In lieu of the first equation, an alternative equation may be used for pretensioned
beams as follows:
ld +
( )
4f pbt d 6.4 fps f pe (d b )
+10 [LRFD Eq. 5.11.4.2-2]
f c f c
where
fpbt = stress in prestressing steel immediately prior to transfer as specified in
LRFD Table 5.9.3-1
This equation was developed by the Federal Highway Administration (Lane, 1998)
and is intended to reflect the effect of higher strength concrete up to 10,000 psi. For
strands with 12 in. or more of concrete cast below the strands, a 1.3 multiplier must
be applied to LRFD Eq. 5.11.4.2-2 to compensate for the lower bond strengths that
can exist in top reinforcement.
When a portion of the strand is debonded or shielded and where tension exists in
the precompressed tensile zone under service loads, the development length must be
determined using LRFD Eq. 5.11.4.2-1 with a value of K = 2.0.
8.3.2.4 The development length of the strand depends on a number of factors in addition to
Factors Affecting the factors already stated for the transfer length. These factors include:
Development Length
The difference between the stress in the prestressing steel at the ultimate member
strength and the effective prestress after all losses. As indicated earlier, the stress
at ultimate strength may range from the yield point to ultimate strength of the
strand.
Use of bonded or debonded prestressing steel.
Flexure-shear interaction.
JUL 03
8.3.2.5 Numerous studies have been conducted on both 1/2 in. and 0.6-in.-diameter strand,
Bond Studies often with conflicting conclusions. A summary of research on 1/2-in. strand was
reported by Buckner (1994 and 1995). He proposed modification of the ld formula
which takes into account the effect of strand stress at ultimate flexure. He suggests
that a strand with a stress at ultimate flexure close to the ultimate strength of the steel
should have a development length almost twice as long as a strand with a stress at
ultimate flexure equal to the yield point of the steel.
Shahawy (2001) suggests that for members with depths greater than 24 in., the
STD Eq. 9-42 results in an unacceptably low development length while LRFD Eq.
5.11.4.2-1 (with K = 1.6) and LRFD Eq. 5.11.4.2-2 yield conservative results. For
members with depths less than 24 in., the K multiplier in LRFD Eq. 5.11.4.2-1 is
not warranted and LRFD Eq. 5.11.4.2-2 is extremely conservative. Shahawy also con-
cludes that flexure-shear interaction has a significant effect on the development length
of prestressing strands and should be incorporated into the design equations. Research
findings remain under study by AASHTO, FHWA, PCI and others.
8.3.2.6 It is recommended that the formula given in the LRFD Specifications be used unless
Recommendations an improved formula emerges. If the formula in the Standard Specifications is used, a
multiplier of 1.6 should be considered for member depths greater than 24 in. Even
though the factor of 2 applied to debonded strands may be too conservative, it is not
expected to have significant impact on bridge beam design.
JUL 03