Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Leeanna Holliday
Mrs. Sluder
Dance
2 January 2017
Dance Critique
I went to the North Carolina Dance Festival which was held in the Van Dyke
Performance Space for my dance critique. I saw many different unique pieces and loved
watching the visions and ideas of different choreographers manifest through the dancers. It was
also nice to see older dancers because I am one of the older dancers at my studio. It is hard
because we cannot see the technical and emotional experience of an older dancer and this was
definitely something that stood out to me at the dance festival. The first three pieces were the
The first piece in the program was entitled "Full Circle". The choreographer, Jan Van
Dyke, created this dance in 1989. She also founded the North Carolina Dance Festival in 1991
and unfortunately just died last year. Virginia Dupont, Laura McDuffee, and Kate Weaver were
the three dancers who performed this dance. They are now the directors and were long time
company members of the Van Dyke Dance Group. Hopefully they are just as amazing
As for the dance, it was not my favorite out of all of them. There were some strengths
such as quality of movement and overall intention. For example, the dancers were very good at
showing slow fluid movement and quickly changing to sharp fast movements. Also, the
Leeanna Holliday 2
choreography went very well with the music. The music was more melodic and therefore the
dance contained phrasing and emphasis that went along with that type of music. Yet, there were
There were also some weaknesses such as the costumes, the technique of the dancers, and
the emotional impact of the dancers. For one, I did not like the big orange wavy pants and the
sleeveless shirts. I felt that the costumes did not fit very well with the dance. The technique of
the dancers was not the best I have seen. They needed to work on pointing their feet, relaxing
their shoulders, and relaxing their arms. Lastly, I did not like that they were smiling through the
whole dance because the smiles did not feel genuine and because of that, the piece did not impact
me emotionally.
I think the technical leg and arm gestures gave a different meaning to the dance by
making it less emotion laden and loose limbed than most contemporary pieces I have seen lately.
In my opinion the choreographer's intent was to bring out musical texture through the
choreography and make it less about sentiment and back-story. This might be why it was not my
favorite piece because I am used to seeing so many dances that are more freelance. I think the
I also noticed that there were not any individual or group tricks in the piece which is
something that is commonly used. As I said before, I did not recognize any real emotion coming
from the dancers and there did not seem to be a theme or back story to the dance. This dance
almost reminded me of the military dance that we performed at Weaver. To elaborate, there was
no emotional background and the movements were there to make the piece aesthetically
pleasing.
Leeanna Holliday 3
The title of the second piece was "When The Bough Breaks". This piece was
choreographed by Kristi Johnson in 2010. Kristi Johnson studied at many different colleges such
as Louisiana State University, Texas Christian University, and Jacksonville University. Presently,
she is a part of the dance faculty at North Carolina Central University, the creator of The Triangle
Dance Project, and the director of TRANSLATIONS, a contemporary company. Brittany Harlan,
This dance had many strengths, and the overall dance was a lot better than the first one.
The quality of movement added so much meaning to the dance because each movement had a
specific intention. As an audience member, I could see that each dancer was telling a story in her
own way. Of course, the technique and the costumes were very pleasing to the eye, but what
really amazed me was the feeling that went along with the movements. The movements were not
just coming from the bodies of the dancers, but from their souls. This is what had me on the edge
of my seat and gave me goose bumps by the end. This is also what made me remember this
I really did not see any weaknesses in this dance. There was one moment when the
dancers almost fell out of their poses, but the rest of the dance was so pleasing that I almost
forgot about the very minor slip. I think the choreographer's intent was to show the different
relationships between people. For example, there were moments where one person would try to
go somewhere, but the other two people would block her. Then there were moments when they
would all help each other. I think this was a very cool idea because anyone watching this dance
could relate to these scenarios. The audience could relate its own story to the dance and I think
I think this contemporary piece is more similar to the pieces that are performed today in
that it has a lot of meaning and is filled with emotion. Also it was more of a group piece,
meaning the dancers relied on each other and moved as one. They also used a lot of group lifts
and tricks which is something that is used popularly in contemporary dance currently. I think the
message behind this dance was to show the effects of different relationships especially those that
are codependent. I saw this theme throughout the entire dance because when one dancer was
falling or struggling to do something, there was always another person helping them get through
the movements. This symbolized a real life relationship where one might be struggling with an
illness or addiction and the other person in the relationship is constantly there to help them.
The last piece that I critiqued was entitled "Phasings" which was choreographed by Eric
Mullis and performed by Eric Mullis himself, Hanna Blackwell, Brittany Skala, and Savannah
Schoenborn. Mullis has studied Tai Chi and Chinese martial arts in the United States, Beijing,
and Taiwan. He attends the Dance MFA program at the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee and
accompanies dance classes at American Dance Festival and at the Charlotte Ballet. Lastly, he is a
This dance had some strengths and weaknesses. The idea of the dance was cool where
each person danced individually but the movements ended up coming together. Also I really
liked how the music was made up of two completely different songs. One song had a dreamy feel
to it with the strumming of a guitar while the other was a hip hop song made of grittier sounds
and vocals. The dancers reflected this by moving to the sounds in different ways and almost
letting the music tell them what to do. When the guitar was playing, their movements were more
velvety and when the hip hop was playing, their movements were more acute.
Leeanna Holliday 5
There were also some weaknesses to the dance. Although the overall piece had good
intentions, it got boring after a while because it was so long and the dancers were doing repeated
movements. Also, it did not help that all of the dancers' faces were expressionless. I know that
this was the choreographer's intention and that he did not want the audience members to see the
personalities of the dancers and just let the movements control the dancers, but to the audience it
came across as boring and without energy. Lastly, the technique of the dancers wasn't amazing.
They all had to work on pointing their toes, relaxing their shoulders and letting the movements
flow into each other. I have realized though, that most of the contemporary pieces in the show
did not focus on technique but on the intentions of the movements and the underlying message of
the choreography.
This piece reminded me of the Cunningham style, because it was very rigorous and
depersonalized even though it did not actually use the Cunningham technique. It was cool to see
that aesthetic in a piece without actually using the Cunningham technique. I think the theme of
this dance was objectivity because the dancers performed the movements without any emotion so