0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
107 vues3 pages
in 2009, Channel4 TV broadcast the documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" presented by Al Gore on climate change. This is the review that I wrote for my website www.zebras54.co.uk
in 2009, Channel4 TV broadcast the documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" presented by Al Gore on climate change. This is the review that I wrote for my website www.zebras54.co.uk
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
in 2009, Channel4 TV broadcast the documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" presented by Al Gore on climate change. This is the review that I wrote for my website www.zebras54.co.uk
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
generated a lot of discussions. US politician Al Gore has the right stamina, enthusiasm, connections and beliefs to make a documentary like this. In fact, this is a film by Davis Guggenheim and produced by Laurie David and Lawrence Bender showing him give a power-point lecture - slide show. The visuals are by Duarte Designs. The main message that we as human beings influence the climate and the fate of our planet for the worse and for the best is powerfully rendered. I liked his comment that science is neutral and that a regime which tells scientists to agree their way commits scientific fraud. What I learnt from the documentary is that scientists agree that global warming exists and the controversy about it is at media level with some groups that dispute it and lobby accordingly. In 2006,The USA and Australia were the two countries that had not ratified the 1992 UN Kyoto Protocol on reducing carbon emissions. (the countries that did not express any opinions on the protocol are: Afghanistan, Andorra, Brunei, Chad, Iraq, Palestinian Authority, Sahrawi Arab Republic, San Marino, Somalia, Taiwan, Vatican-City and Zimbabwe because the USA is responsible for a large percentage of emissions, one can understand why the urge to make such a presentation in that country.
It has to be said that a UK court ruled that
there are nine errors in the documentary: . For example -
Mr Gore's assertion that a sea-level rise of up to 20 feet
would be caused by melting of ice in either West Antarctica or Greenland "in the near future". The judge said this was "distinctly alarmist" and it was common ground that if Greenland's ice melted it would release this amount of water - "but only after, and over, millennia". # Mr Gore's assertion that the disappearance of snow on Mount Kilimanjaro in East Africa was expressly attributable to global warming - the court heard the scientific consensus was that it cannot be established the snow recession is mainly attributable to human-induced climate change. # Mr Gore's reference to a new scientific study showing that, for the first time, polar bears had actually drowned "swimming long distances - up to 60 miles - to find the ice". The judge said: "The only scientific study that either side before me can find is one which indicates that four polar bears have recently been found drowned because of a storm."
Mr Justice Burton said he had no complaint
about Gore's central thesis that climate change was happening and was being driven by emissions from humans. However, the judge said these nine statements in the film were not supported by mainstream scientific consensus. In his final verdict, the judge said the film could be shown as long as updated guidelines were followed. The case was brought by a school governor who wanted the government to stop sending the film to schools. Gore responds that scientists may disagree with him on some details, "but we do agree on the fundamentals." Personally, I am not concerned about the errors because no lecture is 100% accurate and it is rare that mainstream scientists agree on everything, hence the ruling was wise and this documentary needs to make it better is to edit out the points of the presentations that are wrong, some of the errors are from the examples he uses and one of them is a big clunker (the estimate of the rising sea-levels) and Mr Gore will still be left with an important message. It is also very easy to go through the book and highlight the errors (by downloading a copy of the judgement) and juxtaposing them with what is supposed to be correct.
Al Gore wanted to generate discussion about
our relationship with our planet, talk to individuals, families, groups - and he has done so with extensive lectures. This is a mamooth task just like reducing pollution and waste on our planet. An academically- flawed but compelling document and an excellent, intelligent presenter who engages with his audience . Respect. For his wide-reaching efforts to draw the world’s attention to the dangers of global warming including An Inconvenient Truth, Al Gore, along with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), has won the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize.
The film won many awards for Best
Documentary including the Oscars 2007 for best documentary.