Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
DEBRA RITTGERS,
Plaintiff,
Defendants.
O R D E R
on October 31, 2016 and removed to federal court. The court has
Motion to dismiss
1
Case 5:17-cv-04019-SAC-KGG Document 28 Filed 06/02/17 Page 2 of 5
case was dismissed without prejudice upon Dr. Hales motion, but
Dr. Hale has since refiled the action (Case No. 16-4183).
Case No. 15-4947 and that the court ordered dismissed (Case No.
15-4947 at Doc. No. 57). Dr. Hale argues in his response to the
2
Case 5:17-cv-04019-SAC-KGG Document 28 Filed 06/02/17 Page 3 of 5
v. Bluegreen Corp., 296 F.3d 982, 986 (10th Cir. 2002). Under
(2) identity of the parties in the two suits; and (3) identity
427 F.3d 821, 831 (10th Cir. 2005) cert. denied, 547 U.S. 1040
has injured him in order to frustrate and silence Dr. Hale for
judicata.
stated by the Court in its June 15, 2016 decision in case number
4947 because: Dr. Hale did not allege facts plausibly showing
3
Case 5:17-cv-04019-SAC-KGG Document 28 Filed 06/02/17 Page 4 of 5
violated Dr. Hales rights; Dr. Hale did not allege facts which
Rittgers was not a proper defendant under Title VII of the Civil
Dr. Hale did not allege facts plausibly showing that Rittgers
rights. Case No. 15-4947, Doc. No. 57. These arguments do not
lawsuit has violated Dr. Hales rights under federal law or the
Constitution.
Motion to stay
litigating this case and Case No. 16-4183 at the same time. He
4
Case 5:17-cv-04019-SAC-KGG Document 28 Filed 06/02/17 Page 5 of 5
Conclusion
dismiss (Doc. No. 23) and defendant Dr. Hales motion to stay
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Sam A. Crow
Sam A. Crow, U.S. District Senior Judge