Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 5

Three Perspectives Of Organizational

Theory Management Essay


Published: 23rd March, 2015 Last Edited: 23rd March, 2015

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work
written by our professional essay writers.

Organizational theory is based on its three perspectives, which are the modern,
symbolic-interpretive and the post-modern. The perspectives each have different
approaches when it comes to the management of an organization. Modernists
are objectivists who focus on reality of knowledge which is build based upon the
conceptualization and the theorization. An Example would be that a company
earns profits based on the CEO's ability to make right decisions while investing
the money of an organization. The results of the actions can be measured in
profit and loss and can be directly measured. The data which modernists
recognize are from the five senses, through what they see, heard, touch, smell
and tasted. Modern Perspective builds a set of rules that can be used in
organization so that all employees will be able to follow, perform and function,
ensuring the entire process in the organization runs smoothly. Modernists do not
take into account the symbolic perspective of looking outside of the five senses
and looking at emotion and intuition (Hatch & Cunliffe, 2006).
Modernists support the rationalization of organizational practices, as reflected in
management research since the writings of early pioneers such as Max Weber
and Frederick Taylor (Miller 2009). Modernists tend to deal with results or
organized states rather than complex social processes (Chia 1995).The focus of
modernist is always for effectiveness and efficiency. The rational modern mind is
trained for 'progress', both scientifically and productively. (Mills, Terry, Boylstein,
Craig & Lorean, S 2001). Modernists assume that behavior of individual at work
is significantly determined by values, or attitudes, or beliefs, that the worker
holds, and that they can share it with others. Thus behavior of the workforce can
therefore be changed to managerial ends by changing their underpinning shared
attitudes. Modernist believes that there is a positive correlation between
organizational performance and the strength of corporate culture. Modernists
have a strong organizational culture and it is about getting people to agree.
Modernists believe that corporate culture can influence performance within an
organization. Modernist organizations form culture where individual share the
same goal. Modernists argue that external factors can either help organization to
improve performance once they adapt the new transformation or reduce the
effectiveness once they could not catch up with the change. The modernists
assume that workers have to have structure to be able to accomplish the goals of
the organization (Hatch & Cunliffe, 2006).
An example of modernist perspective organization would be the author's current
organization. The workers have a clear job description and even specific sales
scripts in the stores on the retail side. The clear job functions and descriptions
are aimed to build a set of rules that can be used in organization so that all
workers should be able to follow perform and function so that the entire process
in the organization works smoothly Modernist focus a lot on leader's power and
on understanding the culture in the organization so the organizational efficiency
and effectiveness can be maximized (Sedtke, D 2009).
Symbolic Interpretive Perspective
Symbolic interpretive organizations look at experiences that are outside the reach
of the five senses like intuition and emotion. The findings of symbolic interpretive
perspective cannot be easily replicated by others and this is why modernists
disregard symbolic interpretive findings. The commitment the researchers make
is to be true to the personal experience and to honor the accounts and
explanations made by others. Symbolic interpretive perspective focuses on
meaning and understanding and the results should not be generalized beyond
the context in which they were produced. Symbolic interpretive organizations feel
that if workers understand culture and the cultural meaning of behaviors, verbal
communication, nonverbal communication, symbols and objects that workers will
begin to understand themselves (Hatch & Cunliffe, 2006).
Symbolic interpretive perspective defines reality through what is experienced by
having emotions and feelings towards what had happened. This knowledge can
enable organization to engage more effectively with diverse cultures within an
external to organizations (Lundberg 2008). Symbolic interpretive perspective
defines organization structure contribute to work which is meaningful to them by
reconstructing structure through observation and participation. Symbolic
interpretive identifies the reason why work is produced in a certain way by having
stable routines in work through knowledge and human interactions to accomplish
organizational goals (Hatch & Cunliffe, 2006).
Symbolic interpretive organizations see the organization like a community. The
symbolic interpretive organization does not look at testing and experimentation to
get hard evidence like a modernist organization would. The organization is
flexible and reacts well to an unstable external environment as opposed to the
modernist organization which does well in a stable environment but is less
productive in an unstable environment due to the lack of flexibility. Member
characteristics constitute significant symbols whose importance is derived from a
socially constructed process (Hatch & Cunliffe, 2006). Member characteristics
affect both individual group members' behavior and a group's collective behavior.
Groups may take on personality and communication traits from the composition
of their members. Tasks that demand more symbolic behavior tend to benefit
from diverse member backgrounds (Frey, 2004).
Postmodern Perspective
Postmodernism diverges from the other two perspectives in its unwillingness to
seek Truth or to make permanent ontological or epistemological commitments
such as those that give rise to modernist forms of scientific endeavor or to
symbolic-interpretive descriptions of meaning and human meaning making
activity. Seen from these other perspectives, postmodernists seem to flit between
philosophical positions. They often refuse to take even a temporary philosophical
stand because they believe that doing so privileges some forms of knowledge
over others and this violates postmodern ethics. (Hatch 2006). Whereas
modernist philosophers had invoked skepticism in a way that ultimately served to
bolster knowledge claims, postmodernists surfaced and criticized unchallenged
assumptions within the modernist approach, rejecting aspirations to objectivity
and certainty in knowledge and rationality. . (Miller 2009). (see appendix B for
modern versus postmodern principles of management).
In common with organizational symbolism, post-modernism is associated with the
introduction into organizational culture studies of disciplines such as linguistics,
psychoanalysis, anthropology, literary criticism, and history. Foucault's (1972)
influence underlines the realization that concepts such as 'organization' and
'culture' refer not to objects but to linguistic constructs. Attention to discourse
suggests that even if researchers who are interested in 'culture' do not appear to
'have very much in common. organizational culture studies can still be considered
as part of the same 'discursive formation'. (Michael & Stephen 1999).Two of the
major influences on post-modernism in history has been White and Foucault
(Munslow 1997). White is associated with the stream in postmodernism that 'is
informed by a programmatic, if ironic, commitment to the return to narrative as
one of its enabling presuppositions' (1987: xi). Post-modernism has shifted the
emphasis away from seeing archival research as the historian's craft towards a
view that it is the conventions and customs of writing that constitute the craft of
history (White 1995: 243). However, it is to believe that organizations are entities
that take every possible aspect to reinforce power with their knowledge. The
relationship between concepts is always changing as there is no clear definition
of a word or concept can be fully verified. Basically, these theories are developed
on the basis of critically analyzing the assumptions of major theories that
attempts to establish the totality of human existence. Post-modernism seeks to
rebuke the notion that history repeats itself in a consistent form of logic through
'social progress' and 'rationalization'.
The three perspectives can be compare and contrast by using the organization
structure which is the social and physical structure. Social structure is defined as
connection and interaction among individual within each department in an
organization whereas physical structure refers to the layout or geographical
design of organization (Lecture notes 3, 2009, slide 9).The social structure
concept is developed by Max Webber. It is called a systematic study of
bureaucracy which refers by modern theorist for developing the division of labour,
hierarchy of authority and corporate rules and procedures. (Hatch and Cunliffe,
2009, p.103). From a modernist point of view, structure differentiates through
characteristic for having flat or tall organization structure. Tall organization
structure has division of labour by having many vertical hierarchy level from top to
bottom with fewer departments whereas flat organization structure has more
divisions but less hierarchical level (Lecture notes 3, 2009, slide 10). Modernists
presume that social structure has a strong correlation between performance,
roles and human behaviour. They focus on rules to make sure work performance
can be carried out effectively and efficiently.
Unlike modernist, symbolic-interpretivist define organization structure, where
human could create things and contribute to work which is meaningful to them by
reconstructing structure through observation and participation. It is a focus on
how to organize rather than having a structure such as level or hierarchy as
compare to modernism. A symbolic interpretivist identifies the reason why work is
produced in a certain way by having stable routines in work through knowledge
and human interactions to accomplish organization goals. In order to carry out a
set of routine activities, it is assumed that members interact using existing
scheme. Improvisation is another main concept in symbolic organization where
emergency happens, interactions and system will work in a different way to
establish another performance.
As different individual have different experiences and feelings, even some of the
routine remain the same but they applied in another way. Sometimes,
unpredicted situation will create ground-breaking improvision routine that later on
widely used in the organization. Symbolic-interprevists sees organization as a
community. Instead of testing and experimenting to get hard evidence like
modernist, shared interest and understanding through interview and
questionnaire are more likely to be the focus of symbolic-imterpretivist by
emphasizing on interpretation of interacts.
Post-modernist does not accept the fact that organization has structure because
they do not think that there is a boundary. Approaches such as de-differentiation,
de-centralization and de-constructing are used by post-modernist. Modernist
have actual system and method that are recognized by people within an
organization and there are restrict on surpassing hierarchy level but post-
modernism provide recourses and technology for people to set up their own
ideological methods to accomplish their goal. Members of post-modernism
organization have their own mindset on what need to be done instead of having a
standard process among the members. They concern more about how to solve a
problem through studying implications rather than trying to figure out the reason
behind it like a modernist. Post-modernism are considered to be a feminist
organization as every individual has equal rights.
Modernism physical structure is from Hawthorne studies where theorists analyze
organization productivity through the layout, lighting and sound from the
environment (Lecture note 3, 2009, slide 5). The investigation on distance shows
that communication decreased when people are split into smaller division, varied
hierarchy level or even different building. While symbolic-interpretivist would
believe physical structures for a building symbolize meaning and space. The
location of the building and structure of a building can express their organization
values. For example, electricity company Origin has a logo 'O' with the word
'origin' below it. It gives out the message that this company provides natural gas
that is environmental friendly (Origin, 2009, page 1) The RMIT university
business school used the logo RMiT with the word 'BUSINESS' at the bottom to
symbolize that it is information about business school. Physical structures for
post-modernism will be distinguished by having legitimate authority over others.
For example, the office of a CEO is at the top of the building. CEO of a company
is the person who has the power to control everyone.
Organisation Culture
In general, organization culture is developed by having assumption what is
happening and also the degree of awareness to participate to be part of the
culture. According to Schein, there are three levels of culture which are artifacts,
values, and assumptions (Schneider & Barsoux 1997, p. 21) Artifacts consists of
organizations visible symbols, mark or logo which can represent the image of the
organizations. Values of organization can be the beliefs which used to develop
mission and vision statement which is referred by employees.
According to modernist, corporate culture can influenced performance within
organization. Modernism organization form culture where individual shares same
goal. They argue that external factors can either help organization to improve
performance once they adapt the new transformation or reduce the effectiveness
once they could not catch up with the change. Quantitative analysis method is
used to measure the degree of how culture relate to organization adaption and
performance. Kotter and Heskett used the financial analysis various company to
evaluate the strength of the culture (Hatch and Cunliffe, 2006, p.189). Nowadays,
research can by looking at corporation financial year review to see the
performance of culture versus effectiveness.
From symbolic-interpretvists' point of view, they recognized organizational culture
as long as they understand and it is reasonable to them. They need interpretation
and validation that are meaningful when looking at organizational culture. For
example, stories within organizations can lead to an understanding of culture
(Liam, 1989, p.3). Through story-telling, symbolic-interpretivist believes that
people can be energized to create success or be more alert with the problem
they are facing. This can be done through promoting a manager who has great
achievement to inspire the rest of the staff. Social constructionist uses qualitative
data gathering methods where observation will be carried out to narrow their
perspective to investigate organization culture. They will examine through having
interview with their focus group (Lecture 4, 2009, slide 19). Unlike modernism
and symbolic-interpretive, post-modernist stress that organization culture is not
real. They actually have ideological opinions towards cultural and serve it as an
illusion. They advocate power and maintain power to make themselves privilege
compares to the others within the organization. Both modern and symbolic-
interpretive does not have power involved. Modernism focuses on effectiveness
and helps to understand how culture fixes into corporation. Yet, symbolic-
interpretive is about how to carry out the process of training people or to discover
data. They used emotion to guide members in the process of reconstructing
ideas. Post-modernist will struggle to gain power over each other.
Conclusion
It is clear that organization exist through different perspectives. Theory and
concept used also differ when exploring factors from culture and organization
structure as modernism focus on management labour, symbolic-interpretive give
more attention on rational-emotion and post-modernist have significant
awareness on professional-manual. It is complicated to fully define those
perspectives as the culture and organization structure could change over time.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi