Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Persons who embrace an introverted communication style - I incorporated prior knowledge into group discussion.
like to think privately on an issue, listen to what everyone - I asked questions of group members in an open-minded
else has to say, and then speak their mind. They often are way.
comfortable with extended periods of silence in a group. - I built on comments of other group members to enhance
A balance of group contributions occurs when group discussion.
members appreciate varied communication styles while - I volunteered ideas in a constructive manner.
encouraging each other to step out of form on occasion: - I helped the group to summarize its progress.
persons who favor an extroverted style need to periodically - I identified missing information in the group answer.
relax and silently ruminate about an issue; persons who - I built on the ideas of others.
favor an introverted style need periodically to be
encouraged to contribute, even if they havent worked out
the problem fully in their heads yet.
Gender and cultural differences:
Sometimes students assign each other roles in groups
based on gender socialization, relying on communication
styles with which they are most comfortable in social
settings. Groups work together best when group members
experiment with a variety of roles in groups, even those
with which they dont have as much experience.
Sometimes differences in cultural backgrounds
make group communication difficult. You may have grown
up in a community (in a different region of the U.S. or in a
different country) in which communication styles are
significantly different than those you are encountering at
UNI. Typical cultural differences in patterns of
communication include greater or less degrees of
bluntness, greater or less assertiveness in speech, and a
preference for either direct conversation or for roundabout
and indirect conversation. Groups work together best
when members exercise a sensitivity to these differences,
value their uniqueness, and remain open to talking to each
other despite their differences.
Minefields of Egothink and Clonethink:
Group work can become frustrating if a group member
puts all his or her energy into expressing his or her view
and no energy at all into listening to others and reaching
understanding as a group. But group work misfires also
when a group member puts no energy at all into the group
effort, quickly agreeing with the first statement offered and
deciding that the conversation is over. Effective groups
monitor the energy levels in their conversation: there is a
middle road between the monopolizing tendencies of
Egothink and the passive stances of Clonethink. What
leads to an excellent discussion? All members agree to an
extended conversation in which all share their views.
When they move gradually but steadily toward the
integration and synthesis of views, creative, high-energy,
and effective learning occurs among all members of the
group.