Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Per Bak
Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973
phase-locked intervals is 1 and above which the intervals Schematically, the connection between the physical sys-
start to overlap. Most importantly, this line seems to be a tem and the circle map can be represented as follows:
continuous function of the parameters in the sense that
the high-order mode-locked intervals determine a smooth Physical system
critical curve (see Fig. 1). Along this line the complement (pendulum, CDW, Josephson junction)
to the locked portions is a measure-0 Cantor set, and we
find the fractal (or Hausdorff) dimension of the set to be
the same universal number D-0.87 as found for the cir- Differential equation
cle map.
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 are suggesting might from a mathematical viewpoint
Q seem to be a strange result. For the one-dimensional
maps there exist strong theorems guaranteeing that any
C)
00 monotonic, smooth map exhibits only periodic or quasi-
0)
~~
periodic behavior. On the other hand, for higher-
C) r'
dimensional maps the analog [Komolgorov-Arnol'd-
~ t ,r Moser (KAM) -like] theorems only prove the existence of
o ~0
quasiperiodic motion (invariant tori) for maps that are
~ o CD ~0
"sufficiently close" to the trivial ones and no simple cri-
~0
terion for the breakdown of tori exists.
E3
What we find here is the following: If, instead of look-
CL O map, we project out
C3 C) ing at the original two-dimensional
Q) the angular variable and consider the corresponding one-
C)
dimensional map (termed the. "reduced map" in Sec. III),
the criterion for having smooth invariant tori is just as
(b)
for the circle-map case that this map be monotonic. Of
course, we do not in general know where the monotonicity
0.3000 0.3050 0.31 00 0, 3150 0.3200 breaks down in terms of the parameters of the original
map, but it does tell us that the situation, in terms of re-
normalized parameters, is very close to the 1D case.
The layout of this paper is as follows. In Sec. II we
shall discuss the Josephson junction in microwave fields
and sliding CDWs (as found, for instance, in niobium
0.95 triselenides, NbSe3) in applied dc plus ac electric fields.
These systems are described by the differential equation
for a damped pendulum driven by a constant plus a
periodic torque so, in principle, our results can be tested
0.90 on this simple mechanical device. We hope that experi-
ments on Josephson junctions and CDW's be performed
since they can be done with great precision.
In Sec. III we discuss general properties of return map
(c) for dissipative dynamical systems. We show numerically
0.85
I I
that the 2D return map of the equation for the Josephson
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 junction reduces to a 1D map.
In Sec. IV we shall discuss in general the "criticality"
FIG. 1. Critical curves for 2D standard map with dissipa- for a 2D map which collapses to a 1D circle map, taking
tion, calculated as discussed in Sec. V. (a) The curve was calcu- as the basic definition that the map becomes critical when
lated for b=0.25; (b) the curve is a magnification g of (a); {c)the the smooth invariant curve disappears.
curve was calculated for b =0.5, T & 8' & 3 .
I 2
As a concrete example we shall study a particular 2D
1972 TOMAS BOHR, PER BAK, AND MOGENS HOGH JENSEN 30
E =A+ B sin~t
map, the "Chirikov standard map with dissipation" in
Sec. V. We present numerical evidence that the critical
line is sinooth and that there is scaling behavior of the
mode-locked intervals as for the circle map.
N O
O
O !
O L
I = Icsin8 I
-A+B cos~t
V=
h
2e 8
O
O
O
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
A+B cos~t = C + + I
dV V
R c sin8
tc"
8 + 8+ Icsin8
FIG. 4. Phase versus time for rotating pendulum, for a
torque A (or dc current I
in the Josephson junction or dc field E
2e 2eR
in the CDW systems) exceeding the critical value. The time is
FIG. 2. Diagram for the resistively shunted Josephson junc- measured in units of 2~/co, i.e., the external force is used as a
tion, driven by a constant current A and a microwave current clock. The dotted curve indicates quasiperiodic motion, the
with amplitude 8. solid curve periodic motion.
30 TRANSITION TO CHAOS BY INTERACTION OF. . . . II. 1973
0.5
I I
I.O
or v (nv)
FIG. 6. I- V 'characteristics of an g8-Nb Josephson point
(2.4) junction in 295 6HZ microwave field at T=4.2 K. (Belykh,
Pedersen, and Soerensen, Ref. 7.)
where T is the "clock" period of the external force.
If the situation (2.3) is realized for a certain parameter
value (for instance a value of A), then there always exist 7
striking experimental observation by Belykh et a1. of a
an entire interval around this value where (2.4) is satisfied multitude of such substeps in the I- V eharaeteristics of a
for the same N and M; we have phase locking. Nb-Nb Josephson junction.
The above argument merely makes it plausible that In the CDW systems the current carried by the sliding
locking might occur, and it would seemingly work just as charge-density wave is proportional to the velocity 8, so
well for a=O, the zero mass, or overdamped ease, where the average current is
the model reduces to the Stewart-McCumber' model. In
fact, it has been shown rigorously that in this limit only IcDw- &8& . (2.6)
the whole multiples (M= 1) of to survive since (2. 1) is then Hence, a locking of (8) implies a locking of the current
a linear equation (the Mathieu equation) in disguise. ' carried by the CDW (the current carried by the normal
The coefficient of the 8 term is thus a measure of the non- electrons behaves in a smooth way, I-E).
The roles of
linearity of the system. ' currents and voltages are the reverse for Josephson junc-
For the Josephson junction the voltage Vis given by the tions and CDW systems.
Josephson relation It has been suggested that the mass a of the CDW sys-
tems is essentially zero, so there would be essentially no
V= g, (2.5)
2e
so a locking of (8) implies a locking of ( V) and steps
surements. ' '
subharmonic steps in apparent agreement with early mea-
Recently, however, a multitude of such
steps have been observed in a striking experiment by
will be seen in the I-'V characteristics. For M=1 these Brown, Mozurkewich, and Gruner2' the situations for
are the Shapiro steps, ' but in between them subharmonic CDW systems and Josephson junctions seem to be essen-
steps (with M& 1) can often be seen. Figure 6 shows the tially the same.
0 G)(8,8)
R
G (8,8)
I.OO
N
0.50
QP
Q25 0.75
e /2w
FICx. 7. Annular map (schematic) showing the invariant cir- FIG. 8. Return map calculated for 8 =a=y=1, co=1.76,
cle and the invariant manifolds. The simplest locked state is f
P=1.576, 2=1.4. The function (8)=8+iis monotonically
increasing indicating regular behavior. The inset is a magnifica-
shown with a stable and unstable fixed point.
tion, emphasizing the one dimensionality of the map.
period 2nsince th. at period is explicit in (2. 1}. Thus the contracting and hence destroys information on the initial
map R can be thought of either as mapping the plane into configuration, so the motion might asymptotically be con-
itself, or identifying 8 values differing only by multiples fined to a smooth invariant curve 8(t) on the torus (Fig.
of 2ir as a mapping of a cylinder (or an annulus) to it- 5). This means, of course, also that asymptotically 8 is
self, as shown in Fig. 7. just a given function of 8 so that in terms of the map R
Since the points (8,8) are points on a solution curve there exists a smooth invariant curve
for a differential equation, the map must be invertible and
orientation preserving. This means that the Jacobian 8=g(8) (3.6)
on which the asymptotic behavior takes place. Referring
back to (3.1) and inserting (3.6), we find a unique relation
BGi BGi
ee 8, +i =f (8, ) =Gi(8,g (8)), (3.7)
J=J(8 8 )= det gG 2 - gG 2 (3.2) where fthis
is a circle map since it is periodic in 8. We shall
denote one-dimensional map the "reduced (return}
a8 map. "
In the following we shall assume that (3.6) and
(3.7) are single-valued functions although all arguments
must always be greater than zero. below would hold just as well if they were just orientable
J
The value of is simply related to the parameters of curves.
the differential equation, namely %hether this dimensional reduction actually takes place
depends crucially upon the assumption (3.6) for the ex-
e (2~/m)/(P/a) (3.3)
so that J& 1 (the map is area contracting) and indepen-
dent of 8 and 8 because of the simple choice of damping ).00
term in (2. 1).
If the motion is phase locked with
(8& =
~
I'
co,
(8, 8')
CV
it means that there exist periodic fixed points -0.
+
50
such that CP
8= lim (8/2n. n), (3.5) FIG. 9. Return map calculated for P=1.253, 2=1.
2; other
parameters as in Fig. 8. The function develops a cubic inflec-
tion point indicating a transition to chaos. The inset shows an
is irrational. The initial condition will soon be forgotten enlargement of the curve around f2(8I) where 8I is the inflec-
due to the damping of the motion. The mapping is area tion point [f'(8z)-0, f2(81)~~].
30 TRANSITION TO CHAOS BY INTERACTION OF. . . . II. 1975
0.64
To study the region in which the reduced return map
approaches zero slope, we refer back to Eq. (3. 1). Dif-
f
I I I ferentiating with respect to 8, using the assumption (3.6)
.3262 0.3437 of a smooth asymptotic orbit as well as the definition
(3.7), we obtain
CU
0.50
0.33-
BGz(8,g (8))
g'(8+))f'(8)=
n
0 0.25
I I I I
0.50
. 0.75 I.oo
~Gz(8g g(8 ))
8/2 ~ +g'(8. ) (4. 1b)
FIG. 10. Return map calculated for P= 1.081, A = 1.094.
88
The map develops a local minimum and "wiggles" (insets) indi- Now, if we focus our attention on a phase-locked state
cating chaotic behavior. with winding number P/Q, the asymptotic motion really
amounts to jumping between the Q different stable
periodic points 8j, 8z, . . . , 8& (mod2m), so the question
istence of an invariant curve, and for given values of the arises whether g'(8) has any meaning.
parameters we do not known whether or not it is satisfied Quite generally, the map (3.1) is a map of the annulus.
(except in the limit a 1 where the connection with the Figure 7 shows schematically the fixed-point structure for
circle map has been established analytically' ). The best a periodic (phase-locked) state. In addition to the Q stable
we can do is to generate (3.6) and (3.7) by solving the dif- periodic points (8~, 8~), . . . , (8~, 8tz), there are also Q
ferential equation (2. 1) numerically on the computer. Fig- unstable periodic points (8~, 8t}, . . . , (8&, 8&). The un-
ure 8 shows the "reduced" map in a situation where this stable manifold of these unstable periodic points [i.e., the
does indeed happen. The asymptotic form is quasiperiod- point set for which R "(X) approaches the unstable
ic and the map is one dimensional (see inset). Changing periodic cycle as n ~
oo ] is by definition the invariant cir-
some parameters (for instance, increasing A}, we can gen- cle of the map. The coordinates of this invariant circle
erate plots that asymptotically display only a discrete set are precisely (8,g(8)).
of points, namely the Q points 8*, , 8z, . . . , 8& (mod2n) Having now given meaning to g'(8) [and therefore to
which are the stable periodic points of the map R [or in
(3.7)]. The scenario is precisely the same as for the circle
f f'(8)], we shall see that a zero slope for (8) leads to
trouble. Thus assume that
f
map studied in I. Increasing A still further leads again to
quasiperiodic motion.
f'(8)=0 . (4.2)
As described in I, chaotic motion in circle maps sets in Then it follows from (4. 1a) and (4.lb) that
when the map acquires zero slope somewhere in the inter- I
I
g'(0. +2) I
~ ~ (4.9)
CO
00
CO
j
vanish for =1, . . . , exceptionally, we will find that
f'(8+i), f'(0+i), . . . , f'(8+&) remain finite whereas
I
f'(en+N+i) I
f
Consider now the graph of as a function of a parameter
and assuine to start with that f
is an increasing circle
map. Varying the parameter decreases f'(0) toward zero
CO
g'(8) =m (8)/n (8), (4. 12b) where X=(8,8) and D is the Jacobian of the map
(3.1). This defines m coinpletely once they are
n and
and rewrite (4.11a) as specified at some initial point [for instance by n (00) =1,
30 TRANSITION TO CHAOS BY INTERACTION OF. . . . II. 1977
m (80) =g'(80)]. If the parameters are such that the map where b is between 0 and 1. The equation has the re-
is periodic with winding number P/Q, the asymptotic quired symmetry in t9 and the variable rplays a similar
behavior of ( n, m) is given by role as 8 in (3.1). Note that we have inserted 2m's in the
argument so that the map is periodic mod1.
n (8+&) n (8) The Jacobian matrix of the mapping is
m (g +g )
=D(Xg)D(Xg i) ' ' '
D(Xi) m (g
1 K cos(2@8) b
n (8) Kc
os(2~8) b
(5.2)
=M(Xg ~ ~ ~ Xi} m (g n ) (4. 14)
with detD =b, showing that b(1 indeed defines an area
where gand 8+& 8i (mod2n. ). contracting map corresponding to a dissipative dynamical
Now M is a real matrix and has either two real eigen- systein. When b~0 we recover the sine circle map (see
)
values A, i A, 2 or a complex conjugate pair. In the former
case almost all initial choices (n (8), m (8)) will lead to
I), and when b~1 we obtain the so-called standard area
preserving map (Chirikov, Ref. 25).
In this case (4. 10) reduces to
n (8+~g)
e
m +
(4. 15)
f (8+1) f
b
(g
(5.3)
where ei the eigenvector of M corresponding
(ei, ei ) is as f'(8)~0, so the conclusions below (4. 10) are certainly
to the largest eigenvalue and a is the projection,
valid in this case.
a =(m (8),n (8)}.ei . (4. 16) This map has been studied earlier both numerically
and by renormalization-group techniques ' and it has
Hence g' converges to the value been found that, for a series of winding numbers converg-
m (8+&) ei ing to the golden mean, (v 5 1)/2, the scaling is the
g'(8, +g)=g'(gi )= (4. 17) same as for one-dimensional circle maps. In the work by
n (8+g) Rand et al. the general structure of the locked steps was
When the eigenvalues are complex conjugate pairs no sim- discussed on the basis of earlier findings (for a different
ple asymptotic relation like (4. 16) exists and g'(gi) be- map) by Aronson et al. to which we shall return short-
comes undefined. The map loses its smoothness at the ly.
limit cycle fixed-point when the eigenvalues of the product As an illustrative example, let us consider the simplest
of the "Jacobians" at the limit cycle points are identical, phase-locked state, namely the one with winding number
V'detM . 8'=0/1. Here the map has two fixed points, one stable
In the next section we shall look at a particular two- and one unstable. To find these we must solve the equa-
dimensional dissipative map. Since we are looking for tions
universal behavior we might as well choose a simple ana-
lytic map instead of doing cumbersome integration of the
differential equation. For that particular map we shall try 8' = 8'+ II sin(2n. g*) + br*,
to locate the critical line, i.e., the line in parameter space
2'
(5.4)
where the smoothness breaks down. r* =br*
The fundamental question is whether the critical line in 2m
. sin(2n. g ),
any sense defines a smooth curve in parameter space. One
might fear since the condition of criticality at the
periodic points relies upon properties of the matrix M de-
fined in (4. 13) and which explicitly depends upon Q, the
denominator of the winding number
that the critical
curve would be fundamentally fractal. Our finding for
glvlng
sin 2~
2m Q(1
E
b)
the particular map which will be studied
is that it is not
(5.5)
fractal: The dissipation present in the map secures that
the critical line defined through the very high-order ra- Indeed, (5.5) has either 0 or two solutions, the latter be-
tional steps is smooth. ing the case when
V. SCALING BEHAVIOR K
OF THE "DISSIPATIVE STANDARD MAP"
/
fQ/ (0, = (5.6)
In this section we show numerical results for a particu- The eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix D are
lar two-dimensional map which could in principle be the
return map of a second-order differential equation such as
(2. 1). The map is defined by recursion relations in two
A, = ,(1+b Kcos(2+ 8)
variables 8 and r: + j [ I+ b K cos(2m. g)] 4b j '~ ) (5.7)
8+i 8+Q (K/2m. )sin(2m 8)+
br, and the line confining the region where there exists a
(5 1) stable fixed point is found by solving
),
r+i br(K/2m)sin(2m. g iA, i
=1. (5.8)
1978 TOMAS BOHR, PER BAK, AND MOGENS HNGH JENSEN 30
O
CO
O
O
O
O
O
Z O
(3 O
LLI
CL
O
CV
N O
6Q (P/Q) O
O
FIG. 13. ram showing hee hyperbolas here
wher
th e invarj. an s cn h h bl d'
odlc
the ' true O
O
O ~ ~ JL 4% APe A ~ 44& Pl ~ s% P a% 8~~ aa~ 4~ hi ~~
~a
p g ritica sty a O
re. The supersta e .250 0.270 0.2990 0.510 0.530
point where t heh y per oa h tability curve is approx'- WINDING NUMBER
es u . 8y emphasizing
in a single Ar ol*d
h' 1
to, onl y the
li'er treat-
q
nce of a smooth critical
behavior along t is in
then that there ex' t oh l ~ ~
'
critical line on m
wn. Since our prin1 ry
1 V)
~I4
1 a) and ( Th kl ho I
~4
O
ve ry much li e e behavio se en in Figs.
"
Josephson m a p (althoug h the damping in
O
tA
ar er).
ation made in oca-
O
that the imi
ally locate em g 7, 00 7.75 8.50 9.25 10.00
log 1/r
O
a
uld bee taken
calculations this should into account. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
0.340
M
I
~ 0.307-
CL
O
O
C9
CO
0.273 (b)
I I I I I I I I I I III
2 3 4
log I/r
maps (I). To find the endpoints of the P/Q steps we use the critical line, following, for instance, the ideas present-
the critical line defined by the highest-order steps. This ed here. It would be of interest to measure the return map
was done for b=0.25, , & W& , and for b=0.5, directly. The most precise measurements can probably be
3 in both cases approximately 1 00 steps were performed on Josephson junctions in microwave fields,
found. For b=0.25 the edge was found by moving along but no experiment on the scaling behavior near the critical
a critical line defined by linear interpolation between the point has been reported so far.
approximate accumulation points on the edges (the points
marked by squares in Fig. 13), whereas the edge points for ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
b=0. 5 simply have X equal to the K values of the corre-
sponding accumulation points (the points marked by plus We have enjoyed many helpful discussions with our col-
in Fig. 13). In the limit the two methods are, of course, leagues on the subject of this article. It is a pleasure to
identical. For a given rational step the projection of the thank especially Mitchell Feigenbaum, Michael Fisher,
endpoints to the 0
axis determines EQ(P/Q) the width George Griiner, Phil Holmes, Yittan Kao, Mogens Levin-
of the step. Figure 14 shows the winding number versus sen, David Rand, John Sampson, Scott Shenker, Eric Sig-
0
on the critical line (for b=0.25) the "devil's staircase" gia, and Gertrud Zwicknagel. We are grateful to K.
similar to the diagram (I, Fig. 3) for the circle map. Fig- Fesser, A. Bishop, and P. Kumar for discussions on the
ure 15 shows the widths of the steps b, (P/Q) plotted possibility of having one-dimensional return maps for
versus O'=P/Q; the self-similar structure is quite ap- higher-dimensional systems. One of us (M. H. J.) is grate-
parent and the similarity with (I, Fig. 5) for the circle map ful to Brookhaven National Laboratory for kind hospitali-
is striking. Figure 16(a) and 16(b) shows the "number of ty. Another one of us (T.B.) would like to acknowledge
holes" [1 S(r)]/r plotted versus r as for the circle map, support by National Science Foundation Grant No.
where S(r) is the total width of steps which are wider DMR-83-14625. The work at Brookhaven National Lab-
than r The p.lot in Fig. 16(a) is for b=0.25; the plot in oratory was supported by The Division of Material Sci-
Fig. 16(b) is for b=0. 5. The linear behavior indicates ences of the U. S. Department of Energy under Contract
scaling behavior at criticality. The slope of the straight No. DE-AC02. 76CH00016.
line yields
[1 S(r)]/r r- (5. 17)
with D-0. 86+0.01. Hence, the staircase is complete, APPENDIX: NUMERICAL PROCEDURES
and the fractal dimension of the staircase, or the comple- FOR DETERMINING CRITICAL LINE
mentary Cantor set is D -0. 86. The accuracy of this esti- AND STEP WIDTHS
mate is much less than the one for the circle map in I
since (i) a much smaller number of steps were used to esti- The critical points, indicated by ~ in Fig. 14, fulfill the
mate D and (ii) there is additional uncertainty related to fixed point conditions:
the estimate of the critical curve, which was given simply
by %=1 in the circle-map case. Within the uncertainty,
gI =e. eo I'=0 (Al)
the critical behavior for the standard map is the same as
for the circle map. g2 rn rp
0, (A2)
VI. CONCLUSION and the criticality condition,
In papers I and II we have investigated the transition to g3 TrM(go, ro)= Tr g D(8;, r; )=2b
chaos caused by overlap of resonances by studying circle
maps, differential equations representing actual physical The fourth condition is that TrM be a minimum subject
systems, and 2D dissipative maps. Our conjecture is that to the constraints (Al) and (A2) for a given IC.
the critical behavior of all these systems is the same, Using Lagra'nge-multiplier technique, we form the
namely that of the circle map. We urge that experiments function
on Josephson junctions, charge-density-wave systems, and
other systems with two competing periodicities be per- g3 ~181 ~2g2 (A4)
formed to check our predictions.
We are aware of three experiments which have been
where I.
I and I.2 are Lagrange multipliers. The con-
strained minimum condition can be expressed as
performed since we first announced our results: Kao
et al. and Alstrom et al. ' have studied the differential
equation (5. 1) with a "Josephson junction simulator;" they
find scaling behavior as predicted here, with
D -0. 91+0.04 and D -0. 87+0.02, respectively. More I.) I.2 (A5)
importantly, Brown, Mozurkewich, and Griiner ' have arp arp arp ar, '
measured subharmonic steps in the CDW system NbSe3 in
ac plus dc electric fields; they also find scaling behavior in aF aR3
I.I agi I 2
agreement with our conjecture, with D-0.91+0.03. %'e
an= an 'an 'an
feel that the accuracy of the experiments could be im- Thik system of equations has solutions for L~ and L2
proved; in particular, more work should be done to locate only if its determinant is zero:
30 TRANSITION TO CHAOS BY INTERACTION OF. . . . II. 1981
g3
TrM(ep rp)=l+b (A7)
Hence, the fourth condition is In all cases the quantities ag;/aep, etc. (which involves
derivatives up to third order) can be found recursively as
g4 H =0. described in I.
Stated in a footnote in B. van der Pol, Philos. Mag. 3, 13 Lett. 46, 511 (1981); J. Bardeen, E. Ben-Jacob, A. Zettl, and
.
(1927). We thank David Rand for making us aware of this. G. Griiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 493 (1982).
2P.. Bak, T. Bohr, M. H. Jensen, and P. V. Christiansen, Solid A. Zettl and G. Griiner, Solid State Commun. 46, 501 (1983);
State Commun. 51, 231 (1984). Phys. Rev. B 29, 755 (1984).
3V. I. Arnol'd, Am. Math. Soc. Trans. , Ser. 2, 46, 213 (1965); M. P. Monceau, J. Richard, and M. Renard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45,
R. Herman, in Geometry and Topology, edited by J. Palis 43 (1980); Phys. Rev. B 25, 931 (1982).
(Springer, Berlin, 1979), Vol. 579, p. 271. P. Bak, Rep. Prog. Theor. Phys. 45, 587 (1982).
4J. Moser, Stable and Random Motions in Dynamical Systems W. C. Stewart, Appl. Phys. Lett. 12, 277 (1981); D. E.
(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1973). McCumber, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 3113 (1968).
5For reviews, see P. E. Lindelof, Rep. Prog. Phys. 44, 949 M. J. Renne and D. Polder, Rev. Phys. Appl. 9, 25 (1974); J.
(1981); Y. Imry, in Statics and Dynamics of Nonlinear Sys R. Waldram and P. H. Wu, J. Low Temp. Phys. .47, 363
tems, edited by G. Benedek, H. Bilz, and R. Zeyher (Springer, (1982).
Berlin, 1983), p. 170. M. Ya. Azbel and P. Bak, Phys. Rev. B (to be published).
R. Y. Chiao, M. J. Feldman, D. W. Peterson, B. A. Tucker, I S. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 80 (1963).
and M. T. Levinsen, in Future Trends in Superconducting Although workers in the field using Josephson junctions as
Electronics (Charlottesville, 1978), proceedings of the Confer- measuring devices would prefer to get rid of the subharmonic
ence on the Future Trends in Superconductive Electronics, steps as well as the noise.
edited by B. S. Deaver, C. M. Falco, J. H. Harris, and S. A. S. E. Brown, G. Mozurkewich, and G. Griiner, Phys. Rev.
Wolf {AIP, New York, 1979). p. 259. Lett. 54, 2272 (1984).
7V. N. Belykh, N. F. Pedersen, and O. H. Soerensen, Phys. Rev. For a general method of computing J see, e.g. , M. L. Cart-
B 16, 4860 (1978). wright, in Contributions to the Theory of Nonlinear Oscilla
sY. Braiman, E. Ben-Jacob, and Y. Imry, in SQUID 80, edited tions, Vol. 20 of Annals of Mathematics Studies (Princeton
by H. D. Hahlbohm and H. Lubbig (de Gruyter, Berlin, University, Princeton, N. J., 1950), p. 149.
1980); E. Ben-Jacob, Y. Braimap, R. Shansky, and Y. Imry, A consequence of this is that the return map of a second-order
Appl. Phys. Lett. 38, 822 (1981); E. Ben-Jacob, I. Goldhirsch, differential equation cannot be a simple 1D logistic map with
Y. Imry, and S. Fishman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1599 (1982); R. a local maximum. At best, a 1D map is a good approxima-
L. Kautz, J. Appl. Phys. 52, 6241 (1981). tion to the 2D map.
B. A. Huberman, J. P. Crutchfield, and N. H. Packard, Appl. 4For a different argument leading to this criterion, see Ref. 28.
Phys. Lett. 37, 751 (1980); D. D'Humieres, M. R. Beasley, B. B. V. Chirikov, Phys. Rep. 52, 263 (1979).
A. Huberman, and A. Libchaber, Phys. Rev. A 26, 3483 M. J. Feigenbaum, L. P. Kadanoff, and S. J. Shenker, Physica
(1982); N. F. Pedersen and A. Davidson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 39, (Utrecht) 5D, 370 (1982).
830 (1981); M. Cirillo and N. F. Pedersen, Phys. Lett. 90A, D. Rand, S. Ostlund, J. Sethna, and E. Siggia, Phys. Rev.
150 (1982); W. J. Yeh and Y. H. Kao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, Lett. 49, 132 (1982); Physica {Utrecht) 6D, 303 (1984).
1888 (1982); A. H. MacDonald and M. Plischke, Phys. Rev. B D. G. Aronson, M. A. Chory, G. R. Hall, and R. P. McGehee,
27, 201 (1983). W. J. Yeh and Y. H. Kao, Appl. Phys. Lett. Commun. Math. Phys. 83, 303 (1982).
42, 299 (1983). These papers deal with the case 2=0, which L. Glass and R. Perez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1772 (1982).
is less relevant here. W. J. Yeh, Da-Ren He, and Y. H. Kao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52,
M. T. Levinsen, J. Appl. Phys. 53, 4294 (1982). 480 (1984).
F. M. A. Salam and S. S. Sastry (unpublished). P. Alstrom, M. T. Levinsen, and M. H. Jensen, Phys. Lett.
G. Griiner, A. Zawadowski, and P. M. Chaikin, Phys. Rev. 103A, 171 (1984).