Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

The Dangers of Robotics

Technology started (Present Perfect: has started) developing amazingly fast


during the past thirty years. In the period of only three decades, (comma missing) scientists and
engineers invented (Present Perfect: have invented) supercomputers and flat-screen TVs,
started expand (start + ing: started expanding) the research in fields of robotics, genetics and
nanotechnology. The branch of technology that has been developing the most rapid (adverb:
rapidly) during the past years is robotics. Robots can be extremly (spelling: extremely) helpful
and can save institutions (article missing: a great deal) great deal of money, but the
overpopulation of robots, especially these (distance: those) that are human-like and that are
create (passive: are created) to replace people, is utterly dangerous.

Nowadays people lead a fast-paced life, (conjunction missing: and, without comma)
they often lack not only free time, but also the time used for doing their chores (not only X, but
Y can be replaced by doing X, as well as Y they lack free time as well as the time for doing
their chores), and considering that, robots in the household can be very helpful. Robots used
for vacuum cleaning, pool cleaning, floor washing robots, etc. can all make the everyday life
(article: without the) more convinient (spelling: convenient) and less stressful, and
(conjunction: as well as instead of and) help people to spare some free time. The main catch
of this sort of including robots in ones (peoples) life (lives) (too wordy language economy,
perhaps: The aforementioned can lead to people having everything around their house) is
that in future, people will probably have everything around their house automated and
preformed (spelling: performed) by robots (comma missing), not because they lack the time to
do their chores, but simply because people will consider their chores too cumbersome and
tedious (close synonyms: redundant), and make the (article: without the) robots do their work,
which will probably result in people becoming lazy and unmotivated to preform (spelling:
perform) actions they are naturally meant to perform. Worst (article missing: the worst
superlative) aspect of rapid development of robotics is the fact that some people see robots as
equals to humans. Japanese scientists claim that they have connected with the robots they had
created to such extent that they can actually have a logical conversation with them. This (such)
approach to artificial intelligence are (subject-verb agreement: intelligence is) extremely
dangerous because it imposes a threat on people leading a normal and natural social life. As
soon as robots replace humans in households or education, people who are (you can omit who
are relative clauses!) keen on getting attached to material things will start thinking that the
robot they own is their friend, or even worse, that they can achieve a romantic relationship with
(article missing: the) robot. Some inhabitants of Asian countries already own human-like robots
and claim that the robots are far better companions then (than vs. then: than is for comparison!)
their friends. It is possible that such opinion will spread around the world and that people (too
many and conjunctions in general, try: spread around the world, making people become
more keen on) will become more keen on artificial contact than on a healthy, natural human
contact.

In conclusion, the rapid development of robotics can save the (article: without the)
institutions a lot of money, power, and lower (simple wording: money and power, as well as)
potential risk in the workplace. What is dangerous and not discussed enough when it comes to
such fast development of technology is that people (simple word order, S-V-O, would have been
better than starting the sentence with what) will start thinking that robots can completely
replace human role in society, so it will result in a lack of social activities and will endanger the
normal and natural lifestyle people are supposed to lead.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi