Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 44

Induction Heater Tutorial

10kw and 3kw


Disclaimer: The topics discussed use high voltage and heat. They can cause property damage as well as hurt and kill. This site and
author have made this information public for educational purposes only. Anyone who reads this and attempts to make a device
based on any part of it does so at his/her own risk. This is disavows any responsibility, and does not encourage anyone to do this.
An induction heater is an interesting device, allowing one to rapidly heat a metal object. With enough power, one can
even melt metal. The induction heater works without the need for fossil fuels, and can anneal and heat objects of various
shapes. I set out to make an induction heater that could melt steel and aluminum. So far I have been able to feed an
input power of over 3 kilowatts! Now that I have done this I would like to share how it works, and how you can build one.
At the end of the tutorial I will discuss and show you how to build a levitation coil that will allow you to boil metals while
suspended in midair!
The first part of this tutorial will go through my development of a 3kw inverter. My initial goal was to rapidly heat
metals. My next goal was to levitate metals. I succeeded, but realized that I could not levitate solid copper and steel.
Their density was too great for the magnetic field. This was my final goal: to levitate and suspend molten copper and
steel. At the end of this tutorial I will go into the development of a 10kw unit that realized this goal. I will also elaborate
on the problems that had to be overcome in order to achieve this.
Let's start.

My induction heater is an inverter. An inverter takes a DC power source and converts it into AC power. The AC power
drives a transformer which is coupled to a series LC tank. The inverter frequency is set to the tank's resonant frequency,
allowing the generation of very high currents within the tank's coil. The coil is coupled to the work piece and sets up
eddy currents. These currents, traveling through a conductive, but slightly resistive work piece, heat the piece.
Remember, Power = Heat = R*I^2. The work piece is like a one-turn coil; the work coils has several turns. Thus, we
have a step-down transformer, so even higher currents are generated in the work piece.

I would like to acknowledge the invaluable help from John Dearmond, Tim Williams, Richie Burnett and other members
of the 4hv forum for helping me understand this topic. Now, before we talk more, let's see some pictures of what it can
do:

Later, I will give a link to a video showing it running. Here is the inverter:
What I will now do is go over each part. Then, I will give the schematics, go over them and how you can build this
device.

Induction Heater Components


We will talk about each component making up the induction heater. First, there is the work coil. This is what heats the
work piece. The work coil will get very hot from the high current going through it and the radiation of heat from the
work piece.
The work coil is attached to the LC tank. This can either be a series or parallel resonant tank. The tank and coil need to be
cool, so I implemented a plumbing-type design that allows me to pump water through the coil using a fountain pump.
The resonant tank is coupled to the power source with a coupling transformer. The transformer is connected to the
inverter.
The inverter chops the DC power source at a particular frequency. This is the resonant frequency of the tank. Now, as the
work piece heats and goes through its curie point - the temperature when the metal is no longer ferromagnetic - the
resonant frequency changes. The inverter needs to stay locked on as closely as possible to the current resonant frequency
to achieve the fullest power. Some will do this manually, using an oscilloscope to monitor the waveforms, or using a
voltmeter on the tank and tuning the frequency to the highest tank voltage. Another method is using a phase locked loop
(PLL) to monitor the phase relationship of the inverter voltage and tank voltage. This is the method I use and I will
discuss this in detail later on.
Let's start with how to easily make a work coil. We will be using frequencies in the 10s to 100s of kilohertz (kHz), so
metals will conduct the current only slightly below the surface. This is the skin effect. The current depth in mm is

Depth (mm) = 76/(F)

So, the wider the tubing, the lower the resistance. We also want to use tubing so we can water-cool the coil. I purchased
some refrigerator 3/8" copper tubing from Home Depot. You will also need some 1/2" copper pipe and the necessary
fittings so you can feed water through one end, have it circulate through the coil, and come out the other end. I have brass
fittings with nipples so I can attach some tubing to my fountain pump, and a return tube to my ice water bath.
This is the tubing I got from Home Depot.

I want to mention a few points about the work coil:


More turns allow you to heat a bigger piece of metal. The coil should allow you to easily heat your work piece, or to do
so with small movements in and out of the field. The more turns, the less induced voltage, and less induced current in the
work piece. If the induced current is too low you may never achieve a high enough temperature to get beyond the Curie
point, where you will then get a significant boost in heating. I believe this occurs, because of the change in the work
piece molecular arrangement, reducing the quenching effect on the coil.
You will also have a lower Fres for the same tank capacitance. This results in deeper current penetration into the work
piece, which may or may not be desired depending on your application. All this means it will take longer to heat the
metal for the same input power. To compensate you will need a higher voltage going to the work coil if you want to
maintain the same rate of heating. You can compensate for more turns on your work coil with fewer turns on your
coupling transformer. However, you will still be faced with the issue of needing more input power to achieve the higher
excitation voltage on the work piece. You can get more input power by having a higher input voltage or drawing more
current.
LC Tank: Polypropylene Film Capacitor Bank
For my first capacitor bank I purchased my caps from Illinois Capacitor. You can also purchase them from Newark
Electronics.
The induction heater uses a work coil as a step-down transformer. This transformer steps the voltage down, but increases
the available current to the work piece, which is the one-turn coil that completes the transformer. The magnetic flux is
coupled to our work piece. The better the coupling, the more efficient is our work coil. The closer the work piece is to the
coil the better the energy transfer.
This is the work coil and tank. The capacitors are high voltage metallized power film snubbers.

The work coil is made from shaping the 3/8" copper tubing. I use brass compression fittings to attach it to the LC tank.
The tank is made from two 1" x 3/16" thick copper bars. I drill holes in the bars to accommodate the capacitors. We need
a capacitor that can handle several hundreds of amps of current. I purchased some pulse capacitors with current ratings of
14A, 3000vdc, 750vac. With 20 capacitors this is close to 300A average current. The coupling transformer fits over the
copper tubing. If you look closely, you will see the fountain pump submerged in water. This pumps ice water through the
tank and back out into the bucket. Water flows in from the bottom left, through the copper pipe soldered to the bus bar,
through the coil, over the bank to the upper left, and through the tubing connected to the other bus bar, and out on the
upper right. You should also take note where the work coil connects with the capacitor bank. It does not connect both
leads at the front end; instead, the coil connects to
opposite ends. This ensures that the capacitors share
an equal current load. Otherwise, if both end
connected to the front, the capacitors closest to the
coil would handle the brunt of current because the
resistance would be the least. When you are dealing
with hundreds of amps, small changes in Rare
significant.

These are the bars with the holes drilled in them.


The tank uses 20 capacitors, but you can use any
number that gives you the capacitance and current
handling capacity that you require.
First, you need to determine what operating frequency you will use. Higher frequencies have greater skin effect (less
penetration) and are good for smaller objects. Lower frequencies are better for larger objects and have greater
penetration. Higher frequencies have greater switching losses, but there is less current going through the tank. I choose a
frequency near 70khz and wound up with about 66khz. My capacitor bank is 4.4uf and can handle over 300A. My coil is
near 1uH. The capacitors are from Illinois Capacitors. Mine are 0.22uf/3000vdc. The model number is 224PPA302KS.

Fres = 1/2(LC)

Once you wind your coil you can get an idea of its value by making a simple RLC circuit with it and connect it to a
function generator and scope. I used a 1R resistor and a 500pf capacitor. I increased my function generator sine wave and
measured the voltage across R. At resonance the LC impedance drops and the voltage drop across R peaks. This gave me
a ballpark figure, but you can just go by the calculation.

Now, as far as the work coil goes you can form the work coil by driving a piece of PVC tubing into the ground. I used a
1" pipe (1.5" OD). Take the copper tubing and fill it with sand or salt. Make sure it is completely filled. This way it will
act like a solid tube and will not collapse when you bend it. Fix one end with something like a heavy vice and work the
tubing around your PVC tube until you have your desired number of turns. Four to five turns at 1.5-2" will give you a
coil with an inductance between 0.8 - 1.3 uH.

You can see how nicely the coil forms around the pipe. Once you are happy with the turns and shape you can blow the
sand out with an air compressor.

Power Supply: Voltage double and regulated source


I need to talk about two power supplies for the unit. One is the high voltage DC that the inverter converts to AC for
feeding the tank. You need an unregulated, smoothed source. You can use 110vac through a rectifier and smoothed with
a 1000uf-1500uf capacitor for a supply of 170vdc. I used a voltage multiplier to convert it to 320vdc. Below are some
basic schematics for a voltage doubler. I used the third variation for mine. Make sure you have your rectifier on a large
heat sink because it will be conducting a lot of amperes. My rectifier is rated for 25A/500vac.

When I transitioned to my 10kw unit I increased the size of my high voltage supply. Each capacitor is rated for 450vdc,
so I can go up to 900vdc between both ends. I use two 50A rectifiers giving me 100A.
The second power supply you will need will be a 15vdc regulated source. It is imperative that it is regulated because the
PLL has a voltage controlled oscillator. The VCO determines the output frequency based on input voltage it receives.
The frequency range it can generate is based on its supply voltage, Vss. If the supply voltage wanders, the oscillator
frequency will wander and this will definitely throw you out of resonance.

Now, when I made the 10kw unit it uses four Mosfets instead of two. This is twice the amount of gate charging. You
need to make sure your 15vdc supply can supply the amps to rapidly charge the gates. It should also have a robust
transformer and capacitor on the end to make sure there is plenty of charge available. I plan on adding an outboard pass
transistor. One problem that plagued me for the longest time was a jittery inverter current when I reached modest power
levels. The current would jump back and forth when compared to the inverter voltage. It appeared as if two currents were
competing. At first I thought this was EMI affecting my gate drive and I spent the longest time trying to fix it. I noticed
that when I disconnected any one of the four Mosfets the current tracing was perfect. This led me to believe that I was
falling short on charging all the gates rapidly enough, and the Mosfets were not all conducting identically. Remember,
you need to fully turn the Mosfets on in the shortest time possible. I put a scope on the gates and noticed that the slopes
changed when I added the fourth gate. I solved the problem by adding a 39000uf capacitor to my power supply. This was
with a 1.6A transformer and a 2A 15v regulator. The tracing was perfect. I plan on changing the transformer to 3A and
adding adding the outboard pass transistor just to play it safe.

Ferrite Toroids, RCL Theory and Transformer Coupling


I guess the best way to understand what is going on is to start with the work coil and work backwards. Remember from
earlier I said that the work coil is the primary end of a step-down transformer. We have hundreds of amps flowing
through here and this creates a voltage in the work piece. We achieve these high currents because the RCL tank is at
resonance. This means that the inductive reactance and capacitive reactance cancel out, and all we are left with is the
small, real resistance.
Below we have a RCL circuit with a resistance of 4R, Zl = 4ohms and Cl = 3ohms. The reactive impedance cancels to
1ohm, giving us a phase shift of 18degrees leading. The inductor wins and the inductor voltage leads the current. There is
only one current running through the series circuit. You can also say the inductor voltage leads the voltage across the
resistor, because the voltage and current of the resistor are in phase. Remember, the voltage drop across an inductor is a
reaction against a change in current through it. The instantaneous voltage is zero when the current is at a peak because
the change in current is zero, manifested by the zero slope.

If the inductive and capacitive reactance cancel out the phase shift is zero. The current in the circuit is in phase with the voltage.

Now here is an important point. The maximum power transfer will occur when the current is in phase with the voltage.
So, at resonance, the current in the series circuit is in phase with the voltage source. If we are out of resonance the current
phase is shifted from zero with respect to the voltage. If there is more inductive reactance the current lags the voltage; if
there is more capacitive reactance the current leads the voltage. You can also say the capacitor voltage lags the current.
What is the voltage source for the series tank? It is our coupling transformer. I am experimenting with different materials
and turns, but right now I am using an iron powered core from Amidon Corp made from Type 3 material. This material is
good from frequencies between 0.05Mhz and 0.5Mhz. I used two toroids. Each is 2.25" in diameter and 0.565" thick. I
wound 14g wire around for 20-26 turns. I am still trying to figure out the optimum turns and the best material. The lower
the turns the greater the exciting voltage to the tank. However, magnetization current goes up as does the load on the
inverter.
Below are the two toroids. I use two to prevent saturation. I wonder how three would do?
Here I have wound 14g wire around. The transformer does not impart a phase shift if place on the tank correctly. If you
flip, it around you will introduce a 180 degree shift which will prevent the PLL from locking onto the frequency. Just
turn it around. Which way is the right way? Use the right-hand rule.

Here is a solenoid with the current flowing in the direction shown. Put your right thumb in the direction of the current
and your fingers curl in the direction of the B field. The field outside of the coil is not important to us; the field inside the
solenoid sums to one large field going from right to left. If we had a metal bar or part of the toroid's arc inside, the field
would travel through it.

So here is a mock-up of the coupling transformer. The current travels to the positive terminal of our toroid transformer
output. Using the right hand rule we can realize the direction of the B field for each turn. The black arrow on the toroid
shows the direction the field travels in the core. Using the right-hand rule again we see that the current travels through the
copper tubing from left to right towards the positive terminal of our RLC tank. We will use this as the positive lead for
monitoring our tank capacitor voltage later. If you are unsure which end is which you can wind a few turns of wire as a
secondary and scope the ends. The voltages in and out should be in phase.
Ferrite Transformer
When I started this project I didn't understand how one determined the number of turns to put on the primary coupling
transformer. There are several factors to consider. First, the wire needs to be able to handle the current. If you are dealing
with high frequencies, the majority of the current is conducted on the surface. This is the skin effect. You will need to
have several insulated strands to increase the surface area; these strands will need to be twisted in order to reduce eddy
currents. As you pack more wire into the space, heating becomes more significant. If your wire is not robust enough you
might need a cooling system.

The power to your system has a voltage and a current. If you have the means to run high voltages, you can adjust your
windings to keep the primary current low enough to reduce the heating of your transformer and switches. If I want to
keep the primary current low, I need more turns on the primary. As long as I have enough voltage, the same primary
current will yield a much larger secondary current. Let's go over an example:

My transformer has 10 turns on the primary and one on the secondary (this is the resonant tank). Let's assume that the
load across the secondary is 1 ohm. If I have 100v on the primary, a 10:1 transformer gives us 10v on the secondary. 10A
of secondary current requires 1A of primary current. The power draw is 100W. If I want to draw less current, I can wind
a 20:1 transformer. Now, 200v on the primary results in 10v on the secondary. The current is still 10A on the secondary,
but it is 0.5A on the primary. This means that as long as I have a higher voltage supply, I can reduce the current my
inverter requires, and still maintain the same power to my work piece. If I have 400v available, I can draw the same 1A
on the primary, but have 20A available on the secondary.

When heating small pieces of metal with small coils, the current demand will go up quickly as there is little material to
quench the tank. You want a lot of turns on the primary in order to keep the current draw low while still supplying a lot
of current to the tank. If you plan on heating large pieces of metal, the tank gets quenched and the current draw will be
too low for effective heating. You need less turns on the primary in order to provide a higher excitation voltage to the
tank.

Let's look at another example where the work piece is quenching the tank. In this case you don't have enough voltage to
get an adequate current to flow in the tank. If you have 200v on a 20:1 transformer you will have 10v on the secondary. If
the load is 1R you will have 10A on the secondary and 0.5A in the primary. If our maximum voltage is 200v we need to
draw more current, making sure our switches can handle this of course. By changing to a 10:1 transformer we get 20v @
20A on the secondary; the primary we have 200v @ 2A. We are drawing more power and we have doubled the output
current at the expense of needing to deal with four times the primary current. As long as the primary circuit can handle
this we have solved the problem. As you go lower on the turns you need to make sure you do not saturate the core. Also
remember that a small amount of the total primary current is magnetization current.

Oscilloscope Tracings
The inverter outputs a drive voltage to the coupling transformer. The current in is in phase with the current out. When the
tank is at resonance, the tank current is in phase with the drive current of the coupling transformer, and is in phase with
the inverter input voltage. If anything, you want the current to slightly lag the voltage because the Mosfets behave better
when facing an inductive, rather than a capacitive, load. This has to do with the Mosfets conducting in the reverse
direction. The tracing below is clean and allows me to reach very high power levels while maintaining relatively cool
Mosfets.
Now, if the tanks are above resonance we have more inductive reactance. The tank's net current will lag the driving
voltage from the coupling transformer. Since the input and output current of the coupling transformer are in phase, the
tank's current is lagging the inverter driving voltage. Below you can see the dominating inductive reactance results in the
inverter current (triangle-looking wave) is almost 90 degrees lagging the inverter voltage (square wave).
If we are below the resonant frequency capacitive reactance results in the current leading the inverter voltage. Also, there
is ringing in the current waveform and at the inverter voltage transitions. This noise gets worse with higher power levels
and can result in Mosfets failure.

Below is another example of ringing. You can see ringing on the voltage at the transition and on the current waveform. I
have positioned them apart for easier viewing. This is due to high inductance on the gate. Heavy current on the gate
causes a large Ldi/dt. The problem can usually be solved by either increasing the gate resistance (increase the resistor
value), or decrease the stray inductance by shortening the gate lead. I was able to almost eliminate the ringing by
shortening the gate lead, but then I did not have enough length for connecting two in parallel. So I changed the value of R
from 5 ohms to 10 ohms. The first image is with the 5-ohm gate resistor. I was still able to charge the gate with 10 ohms
in a sufficiently short amount of time at 15v.
These images show the waveform after the fix: shortening the gate leads as much as possible to still allow room for
paralleling two of them and increasing the gate resistor from 5R to 10R. Notice the clean voltage square wave and the
smooth current curve. The second image is a blow-up of the first.

Below is a basic sketch of the half-bridge inverter. The coil in the middle is the coupling transformer to the resonant
tank. The arrows show the paths the current takes as the switches alternate between closed-open and open-closed.

Below are two sketches. Sketch I shows ringing if there is too long of a delay during switching. If the next switch does
not close in time, the inductive kick will drive the voltage too high, causing an overshoot, followed by a large dip when it
finally closes. Sketch II shows profound voltage sagging in the middle of the waveform. I had this happen when the
decoupling capacitors went bad, shorting the current path. The capacitors are needed to remove any DC component from
the pulse.
I would like just mention that the inductive waveforms are really an exponential curve. If we can approximate the tank
above resonance as a RL circuit responding to a step response

The solution to

is

Analysis of a capacitor dominant RC circuit will yield something similar. When dealing with a RCL step response one
has

and the 2nd order differential equation is

and the general solution is

If the system is underdamped the solution has the form:

V(t) = e-t(Bcos(t) + Bsin(t))


Oscilloscope Tracings II
Let's continue our discussion of oscilloscope tracings so we can better understand how the inverter is going to work and
lock onto resonance. From the last page I mentioned that voltage across the tank capacitor lags the current by 90 degrees.
At resonance, the tank current has a zero phase shift with respect to source (inverter) tank voltage because the inductive
and capacitive reactance cancel out. If you display the inverter voltage and capacitor voltage together, you can see the
sinusoidal capacitor voltage lags the inverter voltage by 90 degrees. The square wave is the inverter voltage, but you
would get the same relationship if you scoped the voltage output of the toroid transformer.

We will monitor this relationship. We are at resonance when our PLL chip keeps Vc ninety degrees lagging behind V
inverter. Now, we can easily exceed the chips maximum input voltage, so we need to clip the top and bottom the
capacitor voltage, and keep it to a maximum of 15v. We do this with some clamping diodes yielding this waveform,
which will be the signaling input on pin 14 of the HEF4046.
Below is a diagram of the scoped voltages. Using a differential probe, the positive lead goes to the positive inverter lead
going to the toroid and the negative to the negative lead. Using a second differential probe we scope the + and - ends of
the capacitor tank. Vc will lag Vinv or Vtank. We will have to invert the Vc waveform, that is shift it 180 degrees, in
order for the PLL to work, which I will discuss shortly.

Now, we are ready to talk about the phase locked loop chip - the HEF4046. After this discussion, we will have enough
information to understand the workings of the inverter and how it maintains a lock on the resonance.

Oscilloscope Tracings III


I have to share some bad waveforms I got one day. I hadn't used my heater all summer and wanted to try it out before
giving it to a friend. Below are the voltage/current waveform. Underneath is a tracing of the gate drive signal and the
inverter voltage from another run. Notice how the current is no longer a nice sinusoid. The negative current prematurely
starts to rise and then go back down before resuming its normal cycle.
Here is another image. The waveform is different from above, but still bizarre and not a good sinusoid.

This is the inverter voltage (yellow) and gate drive (blue). Notice how the voltage heavily sags and the gate signal is no
longer a clean square wave.
Here is another gate wave that is abnormal taken at a different time.

As you can see, I was getting strange waveforms and I did not know why.
At first I thought it was the Mosfets so I swapped them out. When that failed to fix the problem I redid the gate resistors
and shielding. Then, I pulled out the inverter capacitors and replaced them. Still no good. Frustrated, I took out the board
and replaced the gate drive capacitors. When this failed I redid the entire circuit board thinking I was getting some type
of cross-talk or a failed component. I saved myself from buying another tank capacitor by connecting the coupling
transformer to another LC tank. Again, I had the same problem.
I thought I checked everything and I couldn't understand how the waveform had deteriorated. Sometimes, the current
appeared to go at twice the frequency of the inverter voltage. Then, I had a final thought. I started looking at my high
voltage DC supply. I must have reconnected the HV wires to the inverter early in the summer. Notice in the picture how
they are not together.
They should be together to cancel out any stray inductance as shown below.

Amazingly, after days of racking my brain, this simple solution was all that was needed. I twisted the HV wires close (as
I had done in the past) and made sure they were close on my inverter board before splitting to each of the HV rails. At the
frequency I am driving my coil, stray inductance and capacitance on the HV lines is significant and clearly affected my
waveforms. Not only did this affect the LC tank, but it affected the gate signal and the voltage supply signal to the
circuitry, making things even worse. Hopefully, my experience will make someone's life easier if these symptoms appear.
Below are the waveforms for the inverter voltage and current immediately after this repair. I have the frequency
deliberately higher than resonance to prevent reverse currents.
Below is the gate signal after this repair.

Phase Locked Loop (PLL) Basics


When you read about induction heaters and inverters you will probably come across the term phase locked loop. The
people writing the tutorials will assume you know all about these. I will make the opposite assumption and give you a
brief understanding of the concept so you can understand how this will help maintain resonance with our induction
heater.
A PLL consists of three parts: a voltage controlled oscillator (VCO), a loop filter and a phase detector. The VCOout
drives the device, or inverter gate in our case. It also closes the loop by feeding itself back into the phase detector so it
can get compared with a reference signal.
The VCO generates a 50% duty cycle square wave; the frequency depends on the input voltage to the VCO. The higher
the VCOinput (pin 9) voltage the higher the VCOoutput frequency; the lower the voltage the lower the frequency. The
PLL phase detector compares the phases of two inputs: the reference signal on pin 14 and the VCOout frequency. The
phase detector has two options for outputs: PCA1 and PCA2. We use the former, which is a XOR gate.

Figure 2
The logic is high if one of the two inputs is high; otherwise it is low. It will generate a square wave whose width is based
on the phase difference of the two signals. If the two waves are 90 degrees out of phase the average value of Vphi is
Vdd/2. The loop filter takes the phase detector output and converts this to the input voltage to the VCO. The simplest
filter is a RC low-pass filter. The cut-off frequency will determine how sensitive the PLL is to phase changes, and how
well it stays locked on the reference signal.
So what happens? At resonance the tank current is real and in phase with the coupler transformer voltage, which is in
phase with the inverter voltage. The tank capacitor voltage lags the tank current by 90 degrees; therefore, it lags the
inverter voltage by 90 degrees. Now as the work piece heats its ferromagnetic properties change. The work coil becomes
a variable inductor and affects the resonant frequency of the tank. If the effective resonance goes down, it seems to the
circuit that we increased on drive frequency to the tank. This makes the tank more inductive. Inductance causes the
source voltage lead the tank current. That is, the tank current is forced to lag the inverter voltage. The capacitor voltage
initially lagged the current by 90 degrees. This means the capacitor voltage lags the inverter voltage even more as shown
below.

Figure 3
Below we can see the relationships with Vinv, Vcap and Vphi. Vphi is high Vinv or Vcap is high, but not both.

Figure 4
The top shows Vinv and Vc. An increase in inductive reactance is the same as if we increased our inverter drive
frequency. We lower it by decreasing the voltage to VCOin. We see in the top pair that as Vc shifts more to the right of
Vinv the XOR region increases. However, we need it to decrease in order to yield a lower voltage for VCO. We achieve
this by inverting Vc to Vc_inverted. Now as Vc_inverted shifts to the right, Vphi decreases. We integrate this to a
voltage value and use this for VCOin. A smaller VCOin results in a lower frequency and we stay in resonance. The
frequency range is determined by resistors on pins 11 and 12 of the PLL. When, VCOin is at ground the frequency is at
the low-end of the range; when it is at the supply voltage it is at the high end.
When we are at resonance - inverter voltage and current are in phase - the inverter voltage leads the tank capacitor
voltage by 90 degrees. Vphi is half of half a pulse width (see Figure 2 and 4). The average voltage is Vdd/2, or 7.5v if our
supply is 15v. So, 7.5v at VCOin will keep us close to resonance if our center frequency is Fres. The problem is that Fres
changes with different work pieces and during heating. However, the PLL will adjust itself to maintain a lock on the
phase relationship.
The scope images below show these waveforms. The first picture is at a lower frequency than the bottom picture. Shown
are Vcap_inverted, Vinv, and Vphi. The capacitor voltage is clipped to protect the PLL chip.
The capacitor voltage is a clean signal, and was distorted when I tried to show three signals. Below is just the inverter
and tank capacitor voltage.

We need to discuss a few more things about the PLL next.

Phase Locked Loop (PLL) Basics II


If you will recall, here is a block diagram of the PLL device.
There are several filters one can use for the feedback loop. The simplest is the passive low-pass RC filter. I used the
active integrator, which use a R and C element. To ensure a DC bias does not work itself into the capacitor, I put a
discharge resistor in parallel with C. The active filter has more gain than the passive filter. The phase shift in the
beginning is -90. I don't know if this helps keep our signals at -90 or not. I scoped both the passive and active filter action
by monitoring the relationship of the inverter voltage and current, and I can say that the latter maintained a tighter lock
on a -90 phase difference during changes in the tank's resonant frequency. Below is a table of some filters. I used one
similar to the second. I add a variable voltge input to V- on the op-amp, which allows me to fine tune the frequency. I
usually tune it slightly above resonance, using a voltage monitor on the tank voltage for the near-high point. One other
thing: you need a gain of -1 after the active filter because it inverts the signal. The -1 gain op-amp will restore the proper
polarity.

Let's talk about how we set the free-running PLL frequency and the range it can capture. If the resonant frequency falls
with the PLL capture range, the PLL will be able to find the frequency that maintains the 90 degree shift that we want,
and maintain this phase lock as the frequency required for this phase difference changes over a wider range of
frequencies.
Here is the chip
These formulas can be off and require constants as shown below:

You can also use graphs on the manufacturer datasheets to get you in the ballpark for the values you need. The first step
is to determine the capacitor value that will get you near your Fres at a given Vdd voltage. Determine the R value you
need for Fmin, and then determine the R you need for Fmax.
Let's do a quick example. My Fres is 65kHz and my supply is 15v. Actually, my supply is 14.4v, because I have a diode
to protect from hooking up the pos and neg in reverse. I go up the left hand side to the 60khz row and across to the 15v
supply line. I go straight down and get a C1 of 300pf. This will be my starting point for my equations. Using C1 = 330pf,
I will pick some R values and measure the actual frequency in order to determine the values of the constants K1 and K2.
We want to have the center frequency, (Fmin + Fmax)/2, equal our resonant frequency, and we want about 10-15kHz on
either side. Now, the chips can vary from the equation by a factor of 4, so you need to multiply each equation by a
constant. Take a 100k resistor for R2 and R1. Ground pin 9 and measure Fmin. Next, connect pin 9 to Vdd and measure
Fmax. This will give you K1 and K2. I measured 50kHz for Fmin, giving me a K1 of 1.81. I then connected pin 9 to Vdd
and got 154khz. Subtracting Fmin, 50khz, I was able to dedue that K2 equals 3.78. My frequency is 65kHz, so I want
something between 50-80kHz. I will use a 330pf capacitor, as determined from the graph, and values of K1 = 1.81 and
K2 = 3.78. I now use these values to determine the true values of R1 and R2 that I need, which is 100k and 348k. The
calculations are below. Of course, you need to verify this with your scope.
Fmin = 50khz = 1.81/ (100,000 x 362e-12)
Fmax = 80khz = 50khz + 3.78/ (348,000 x 362e-12)
On my circuit I add a trim pot and another resistor in parallel to R2 with an optional jumper. This gives me a selection of
resonant frequency ranges.
So, how does our circuit come together? Let's see.

Induction Heater Inverter Schematic


Most of the electronics components on the schematic are from Digi key Corp and Mouser Electronics.
PLL OVERVIEW
The PLL receives two inputs through pins 14 and 9. Pin 14 is the clamped capacitor tank voltage. It is inverter (shifted
180 degrees) in order for the feedback to work properly. The high voltages are kept down with R1. All inverter grounds
are isolated from earth ground. C7 and resistors on pins 11 and 12 set the capture range. Jumper JP1 converts pin 12's
resistor from 100k to 60k. R5 affords you the ability to vary the capture range even more for tuning the center frequency
to the tank resonant frequency. We will discuss this at the end.
PCAout goes through the active integrator filter, which is made up of a quad op-amp. The integrator output then goes
through a filter with a gain of -1 to restore the polarity of the signal. During use, jumper JP2 is open and JP3 is closed to
allow the feedback to get to pin 9. The drive frequency leaves pin 4 and drives a non-inverting and inverting gate drive.
These chips drive the primary of a 1:1:1 gate drive transformer, T1. C1 removes DC bias. Diodes D5 and D6 offer some
delay so both Mosfets are not on at the same time. These series diodes have nothing to do with reverse currents, like the
ones you are used to seeing across the DS junction. Again, they are for timing. Your tracings should be short to the gate
drive on the Mosfets. I have connectors on my board going to wires which run to the chips on large heat sinks. The wire
acts like an antenna and you can get noise which will induce wild oscillations in your Mosfets, destroying them. I put a
ferrite bead that attenuates frequencies above 300khz right before the lead to the gate drive. This works perfectly. Below
are the tracings going to the gates and then showing the tracing from one of the gates and the inverter output.
TIMING DELAY FOR MOSFETS
These are the gates drive signals going to the Mosfets. The signals are superimposed. The small slope is part of the delay
imparted by the series diodes D5 and D6.
This is the inverter tracing on top, and one of the gate drive signals on the bottom. With this Mosfets, when the gate is
high the DS junction grounds the power, so the voltage drops to zero.

Below is the timing showing ZVS. The voltage goes through zero volts exactly when the current is zero.
Below, one of the series diodes is shorted, so we can compare the timing of the signal going to both gates. The bottom
tracing has the transformer gate drive going directly to the gate. The tracing above it goes through the diode The temporal
difference between the gate drive with and without the series diode is close to 100ns.

Below are the gate drive waveforms with both series diodes working.
Below, both series diodes are shorted, and we can see the time to reach the same voltage is delayed by about 200ns.

OP-AMP INTEGRATOR
The op-amp is centered around Vdd/2. R10 moves the center point on the integrator allowing you to fine tune PLL
frequency. You can force it to stay a little above resonance by adjusting it. When connecting it to the circuit, set it up so
clockwise motion increases the PLL frequency.
MOSFETS, ZERO VOLT SWITCHING, and CURRENT MONITORING
Mosfets U1 and U2 have ultra-fast diodes across the source and drain to protect the slower acting intrinsic drain diodes.
There are no series isolation diodes with the Mosfets for two reasons. We are doing zero volt/current switching which is
guaranteed when the circuit is in tune by the PLL. When we switch the Mosfets there is no current or voltage on the
device. Secondly, the present day Mosfets have very fast intrinsic diodes, rated for flywheel service. Capacitors C1 and
C2 set a point half-way above ground, which gets charged when U1 is open, and discharges to ground when U1 closes
and U2 opens. The current transformer T2 uses a 1:100T ratio to monitor the inverter current. The 100R resistor means
that every 1V on the oscilloscope is 1A of current going to the coupling transformer.
Now, let's look at the tank circuit schematic. The inverter output is coupled to the tank through T3, which is a 20:1 toroid
transformer. The 20 turn primary is connected to the inverter output. The coper tubing which form the connects for work
coil and capacitor serves as a one-turn primary. You can experiment with different toroid materials and turn-ratios. The
resonant frequency will change as the material goes through its curie point.
Below is a picture of the current conduction through the inverter during different phases of the power transfer cycle. It
shows how the free-wheeling diodes come into play to divert the reverse current around the Mosfets.
During Mode 1, the upper Mosfets is conducting and transferring power to the resonant tank through the coupling
transformer in our circuit. In Mode 2, the Mosfets are transitioning, and the upper Mosfets turns off slightly before the
bottom one turns on. Here, current is conducted through the free-wheeling diode of the lower Mosfets. In Mode 3, the
lower Mosfets turns on, and the resonant tank throws the power back through Mosfets. In Mode 3, both Mosfets are off
during the transition, and the upper Mosfets free-wheeling diode conducts the current.
TUNING

You will have to tune the PLL to your tank's resonant frequency. To do this just connect jumper JP2. Leave jumper JP3
open, which goes to the integrator. With a volt meter, measure the voltage at pin 9 and the inverter ground. Trim R6 until
you have one half of your supply voltage. Accounting for the diode voltage drop on the regulated 15vdc supply, this
should be around 7.2v. You will need a differential set of oscilloscope probes to do this next part right. Put one probe pair
across the current transformer, which would be across R15. Put another probe pair across the inverter output at J2. This
will monitor inverter voltage and current. Using a variac, set the voltage input to your inverter high voltage supply to a
low value like 30-40vac. Trim R5 until you have the current and voltage in phase. A cruder method uses an unregulated
rectifier with a smoothing capacitor with the voltage input being the tank capacitor. Monitor the voltage for a maximum.

Once you are confident that the PLL's center frequency is close to the resonant frequency, open jumper JP2 and close
jumper JP3. Turn on the inverter first and then turn on the variac to the voltage doubler, which provides the high voltage
for the inverter. Slowly increase the voltage while monitoring the inverter voltage and current waveforms. After 20 or
30v you should see it lock onto Fres. The inverter output will be a nice square wave and the current will be close to a
smooth sinusoidal tracing. If all you see is a triangle-looking wave for the current, you probably have the polarity wrong
on your capacitor voltage input to pin 14. The quickest fix is to swap the connections going to the coupling transformer.
Try it again and it should work.

PLEASE NOTE THERE ARE MORE SCHEMATICS AT THE END OF THIS TUTORIAL (YOU HAVE MORE WEB
PAGES TO GO)
You can watch a video of it working here.

If you have read this much, you might want to read a bit more. These two other sites are well worth the reading and
explain things from their perspective with regards to the theory and construction of an induction heater.

Neon-John's Induction Heating Site


Tim Williams Index Link

Comments should go to jonathan_at_houseofficer.com

The next page shows images of the actual circuit.

PC Professor Computer Training, Service & Support

NOTE: There are more schematics for a higher powered unit at the end of this tutorial using microprocessor-controlled
resonance locking.

This unit includes plans for levitating metals using high-powered magnetism.

Making a circuit board and components


Everything starts with making my own circuit board. I got positive photoresist boards and made my own with a
fluorescent light. You need a positive developer, such as sodium metasilicate pentahydrate. Then, I used Ammonium
Persulfate in an etching tank and agitator. The result is below. If you need electronic parts, Digikey and Mouser are good
sources. There is always EBay.
Induction Heater Levitation Tutorial
Induction heating and levitation is pretty cool. Using a levitation coil, you levitate a conductive object in the magnetic
field and heat within that field. Depending on the metal and power setting you can even boil it mid-air. Aluminum will
levitate and melt easily at 1-1.5kw of input power. You can levitate copper and steel balls. You can even melt them;
however, solid balls were too dense at my 2.5kw power level. In order to melt solid copper and steel you need near 8kw
of power; suspending molten copper and steel requires over 10kw of power. Component heating can be an issue so you
need to make sure you have a robust cooling system for the Mosfets, igbts, diodes, transformer and coil.

Current going through the coil sets up a magnetic field. This field, according to Lenz's law, sets up an opposite magnetic
field in the work piece. This magnetic field opposes the one inducing it, and repels the object upwards. The picture below
shows a snapshot in time. The field alternates. The coil also increases in diameter as one moves upwards. This results in
there being a magnetic force underneath the object, but nothing directly above it. This results in an upwards force. The
object moves up until the distance of the work piece to the inner surface of the coil is such that the magnetic field is too
weak to drive it up any more. The bucking plate at the top turns in the opposite direction. The two fields cancel out so
there is no upward driving force at this point. It is a null zone.

Now, the magnetic field created in the work piece creates circulating eddy currents. These currents heat the work piece.
The closer the work iece gets to the coil the better the coupling, which creates more heating. You will find if you gently
push the object down with a quartz rod it will heat up very quickly.

Below are some diagrams showing what was just discussed.


Below are the pictures of the levitation coil. The turns are tight, so you will need to use sand or salt so you can bend it
without deforming the tubular shape. The coil is a conical helix. The bottom has a smaller inner diameter than the top.
Make a bow to reverse the direction and turn 1-2.5 coils in the opposite direction for the bucking plate. Keep the coil
tight, but make sure the coils don't short. You will need a quartz rod to hold the object in place until it levitates, or while
it is heating. This is one levitation coil that I made. I made another one that is slightly larger. When I am levitating dense
metals I keep the bucking plate further from the main coil to minimize the downward forces on the work piece.
IXYS Power Mosfets and microprocessor tracking
The Mosfets are from IXYS Corp, which can be purchased from Digikey Corporation. The microcontroller is from
Arduino.
Ten kilowatts are a lot of power, and this is what is needed to levitate molten copper and steel. At this power level high
currents cause oscillations on the gate and the PLL topology is not good enough to maintain a tight resonant lock. I
wanted something that could find the resonant frequency with any coil and lock onto it without any manual adjustment.
Precise resonant locking and tracking was accomplished with a microprocessor-PLL circuit. I use the PLL to find the
phase difference between the inverter and tank capacitor. Ninety degrees is the correct phase difference. I use the
microprocessor to monitor the PLL output and develop a DC voltage that corresponds to the phase difference. I use this
DC voltage as the input to the PLL's VCO in order to maintain the correct frequency. Here is an important point: tune to
a slightly higher frequency so the current slightly lags the voltage. If you are too close, or the current leads the voltage,
the Mosfets will heat up. I got my Mosfets to get hot with small currents if I had the tuning too close to ZVS. When I
tuned the current to slightly lag I had 10x the current going through them and they still remained cool (with forced air
convection).
Next, I had to move to a 240 vac line @ 30-50A. At this power level heating becomes a very real issue. I have two 100
cfm fans blowing on each 5"x5" heatsink for the Mosfets. I switched to Mosfets because they work a better at the 100
kHz frequency range, and they have less switching losses. I am currently using the IXYS Polar HiPerFET series
IXFN56N90P Mosfets. I am using two in parallel for each leg of the half-bridge. At 25c each Mosfets can handle 56A. I
am figuring that I should keep each under 30A, which is why I have two of them. They are rated for 900v.
Running Mosfets in parallel can be tricky. First, you want to make sure they all come from the same lot. The problem
with running more than one device is unequal heating and oscillations on the gate. Fortunately, because these Mosfets
have positive thermal coefficients, the hotter they get the less current they conduct. This way, one Mosfets does not run
away and carry more and more current as it gets hotter than its partner. Make sure the Mosfets for each leg are on the
same heat sink. Second, you need the have enough resistance on the gate to prevent oscillations. Five ohms is enough. I
used 10 ohms because the Ldi/dt was too high with the former, resulting in ringing during the transitions. I originally had
ferrite beads on the gate leads, but I eliminated them in order to shorten the lead length. This resulted in even less ringing
to the point of it almost being non-existant. The gate resistor was sufficient to prevent oscillations on the parallel devices.
ATMega Microprocessor and the Arduino
The key to having the driver being able to find, track and maintain a perfect resonance lock is the ATMega328
microprocessor. Of course, one can choose another microprocessor. You will need to be able to easily program it. I used
the Arduino Duemilanove. This board allowed me to easily interface with my computer and upload code. A USB cable
connects from the computer to the board. The DIP chip fits into the socket and that is all. Arduino offers some solutions
to mount the chip with all the necessary hardware into your project; I found it very easy to just put in a socket with the
minimal connections on my own to get it working.
Litz wire, magnet wire, ferrite toroids
I then found that the coupling transformer was getting hot. It got so hot the wire started melting though the insulation. I
switched the toroid from the powered iron to a 3C90 ferrite toroid core. I use 4 1" thick x 2.5" OD x 1.5" ID toroids. I
got them from Ferroxcube. The part number for the 3C90 material is TC25151. The high permeability ferrite and the
number of them assures me there will be no core heating or saturation. The wire is #10 and I use about 20 turns. I found
that at lower turns the primary current was too high. By adding more turns, I needed more primary voltage, but I used
less current. I then mounted a dedicated 100cfm fan for cooling the transformer.
Right now I am trying ferrite toroids that are larger to accommodate a thicker gauge of wire. I am using the ZP48613TC
toroids from Magnetics. They are about 4" x 3" x 1/2". I am using seven of them to reduce the flux density. They are
coated so I don't need to worry about shorting the wire. The wire is made from 23g magnet wire. I have 64 strands (good
for 46A of DC current) twisted and braided. This took a little time, but I got it down to make 25' cord in a short period.
100khz should use 26g, but I think the 23g will work out well enough. I don't want to braid several hundred strands. I
will go over some flux calculations on the next page.
The original primary used 10g wire. This was unable to handle the current, and despite forced convection cooling,
overheated and melted the vinyl wire coating.
Below is the braided litz wire that I made from magnet wire

Below is the ferrite toroid wrapped with 26 turns of the magnet wire braid
Ferrite Toroid
One needs to make sure the maximum flux density of the core is not exceeded. If one exceeds this value, the permeability
will go towards one (the permeability of air) and the transformer will no longer function as a transformer. That is, it will
cease transferring power.
So, let's calculate the flux density of our ferrite coupling transformer. This is a Magnetics, Inc. P material core. Please
refer to the chart below provided by this company.

According to this chart, the maximum flux density is 5000 gausses at 25C. At 100C this number will be closer to 3000
gausses.
Now, we need to calculate the flux density of our core. The cross-sectional area of the ZP48613TC is 1.8cm2. We have 8
of them for a total cross-sectional area of 14.4cm2. We are using between 19-24 turns depending on the heating
application. We'll use 20 for convenience. The voltage is close to a pure square wave with a slight ripple voltage, and the
RMS value is near 350V. With use a multiplication factor of 4 for a square-wave; we would use 4.44 for a sine wave.
The formula is Bmax = E x 108 / (4 x N X F X A)
This yields: 350 x 108 / (4 x 20 x 100,000 x 14.6) = 300 gauss
So, in a worse-case scenario, we still have a 10x safety margin.
Tinned Copper Braided Shielding, EMI, Celem Capacitor
Tinned copper braid, or copper braided shielding wire is essential to keep the emi out of the gate leads. Magnetic noise is
a big problem, and it gets worse at the power levels needed for levitation. The tinned copper resists corrosion. Depending
on your leads you will need anywhere from 1/4 to 1/2-inch copper braid. This envelops the gate leads and is connected to
the ground.
One not only needs to worry about how the emi affects the gate drive on the inverter, but how it affects the PLL feedback
loop on the driver. The solution begins by separating the drive circuitry from the high powered inverter section. I now
have two boards. One board tracks and generates the drive signal. All of the critical signals are shielded with a grounding
plane. The signal exits in a shielded wire that is connected to ground. This goes to the second board. On this board the
gate drive lead is shielded with the shield connected to ground. The Mosfets modules are electrically isolated from the
heat sink. If they are connected the heat sink will broadcast the inverter waveform and interfere with the feedback
signals. The gate drive signal goes through a damping resistor. I originally had a ferrite bead, but found this was not
necessary. I have copper shielding completely covering the gate drive lead. Inside the shielding I have the lead going to a
10-ohm resistor. It is important that each switch has its own resistor as close to the gate as possible to reduce oscillations.
So far this has worked out well. I have seen what happens with poor shielding, and it isn't pretty.
Below is a picture of the inverter with the shielded leads.
I also had to modify the feedback control loops. I use RC networks to filter the pulse-waves from the PLL to create a DC
feedback signal. I then use RC networks to take the PWM output and convert it into a steady DC signal for the PLL's
VCO input. The better my filtering for a smooth signal, the longer the delay. If the delay is too long the system oscillates.
If the filtering is not sufficient, the drive signal is course. The trick was to find the right balance.
The tank capacitor was another issue. A rough calculation showed that I was already maxing out the capability of my
capacitor bank. I had 20 capacitors that were each rated for a maximum of 14A. I must have had between 200-300A
going through them with my 2kw unit. I switched to a water-cooled Celem capacitor that was rated for 600V/1000A
(part# CSP-505-2.6uf). The connections were made so that every contact point shared current equally. If you make the
connections incorrectly, all the current will go through the closest point and rapidly overheat the copper. I witnessed this
and it was not pretty.
I will start elaborating on the modified drive circuit and the inverter on the following pages (to come shortly).

Here is the 10kw unit in action

Here are some links to the levitation coil in action for the 2kw unit
Levitating and melting aluminum
Levitating and melting copper scrap
Levitating copper tubing
10kw Induction Heater Inverter Schematic
I got most of my components from Digikey Corp and Mouser Electronics. The microprocessor is from Arduino

Microprocessor/PLL controlled driver


10kw Inverter for use with levitation and iron forging