Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
construction
wind farm support
Kolbjrn Moldskred Hvard Stave
Area Sales Manager Deputy Managing Director
ULSTEIN DESIGN Design Manager
ULSTEIN DESIGN
ULSTEIN X-BOW - ULSTEIN A104 and ULSTEIN AX104, December 2004
Identical equipment
Equivalent payload
Equivalent main data
Same price !
ULSTEIN X-BOW
ULSTEIN X-BOW vs. normal bulbous bow
9
Equivalent Vessels, Same waves, Same speed Different bow
1. No spray
2. Soft entry into waves
3. Efficient parting of waves, wave energy
1
transfer is minimised (less speed loss)
2
3 4. Sharp hull shape
8
5
5. Spray generation
6. High bow impact forces and slamming 6
7
7. Wave is pushed forward, wave energy is
moved against hull (more speed loss)
8. Blunt hull shape
ULSTEIN X-BOW vs. Conventional bow - Speed loss in waves
Speed [knots]
Attainable speed
10
Reduced fuel consumption
or higher transit speed in 8
waves P105
6 PX105
4
Speed Loss
2
Reduced emissions and
fuel costs 0
0 2 4 6
Hs [m]
Summary ULSTEIN X-BOW hull design advantages x
Higher transit speed in calm water due to low angles of entry and increased
waterline length
No flare, eliminating bow impact and/ or slamming in foreship
Reduced noise and vibration levels in foreship due to soft entry in waves
Less spray due to water not being thrown forward
Negligible occurrences of green water on bridge deck
Higher transit speed in head sea, giving reduced power consumption and/ or
higher fuel efficiency both in waves and still water
Lower pitch and heave accelerations due to foreship volume distribution and
slender hull lines
Higher operability in head and following sea