DEFENDANT EXHIBIT 1

AFFIDAVIT OF SPECIFIC NEGATIVE AVERMENT

The undersigned, Mark F. Coble, hereinafter Affirmant or Defendant, does solemnly affirm,
declare and state as follows:

1. Affirmant is competent to state the matters set forth herein.

2. Affirmant has knowledge of the facts stated herein.

3. All the facts herein are true, correct, complete and admissible as evidence, and if called
upon as a witness, Affirmant will testify to their veracity.

Plain Statement of Facts

4. Affirmant sees no verifiable evidence of an oath of the alleged attorneys that is accepted
and that said parties are not commanded to honor their oath and uphold and protect the
rights of the Affirmant exists and Affirmant believes no evidence to the contrary exists.
Defendant demands strict proof thereof.

5. Affirmant sees no verifiable evidence that attorneys have an employment contract with
Plaintiff that exists and Affirmant believes no evidence to the contrary exists. Defendant
demands strict proof thereof.

6. Affirmant sees no verifiable evidence that Plaintiff counsel is being directed by the
Plaintiff exists and Affirmant believes no evidence to the contrary exists. Defendant
demands strict proof thereof.

7. Affirmant sees no verifiable evidence that attorney firm in this case is an agent of
Plaintiff, nor does Defendant believe any evidence exists. Defendant demands strict proof
thereof.

8. Affirmant sees no verifiable evidence that Note was delivered to Nationstar Mortgage nor
delivery of Note from Nationstar Mortgage to new Plaintiff exists and Affirmant believes
no evidence to the contrary exists. Defendant demands strict proof thereof.

9. Affirmant sees no verifiable evidence of any injuries to the Plaintiff exists and Affirmant
believes no evidence to the contrary exists. Defendant demands strict proof thereof.

10. Affirmant sees no verifiable evidence that Defendant defaulted on alleged loan exists.
Defendant believes no evidence to the contrary exists. Defendant demands strict proof
thereof.

1
11. Affirmant sees no verifiable evidence that the Plaintiff, the Trust, has the capacity to sue
under their Trust Agreement(s) exists and Affirmant believes no evidence to the contrary
exists. Defendant demands strict proof thereof.

12. Affirmant sees no verifiable evidence that Freddie Mac has transferred their beneficial
rights (in subject loan) to any party and Affirmant believes no evidence to the contrary
exists. Defendant demands strict proof thereof.

13. Affirment sees no verifiable evidence of the record of possession of the Note exists and
believes no evidence exists to the contrary. Defendant demands strict proof thereof.

14. Affirment sees no verifiable evidence to show that Belinda DeArman was employed by
First Horizon Home Loans when she indorsed the Note exists and Affirmant believes no
evidence to the contrary exists. Defendant demands strict proof thereof.

15. Affirment sees no verifiable evidence to show the timeline of various servicers
servicing the alleged Note exists and Affirmant believes no evidence to the contrary
exists. Defendant demands strict proof thereof.

16. Affirment sees no verifiable evidence to show when the indorsement was placed on the
Note exists and Affirmant believes no evidence to the contrary exists. Defendant demands
strict proof thereof.

17. Affirment sees no verifiable evidence showing that a collateral/custodial file with all
reports and entries exists and Affirmant believes no evidence to the contrary exists.
Defendant demands strict proof thereof.

18. Affirmant sees no verifiable evidence of a physical or electronic accounting journal,

related to the Defendants Note, showing its balance, current value, payment, write-offs
or losses exists and Affirmant believes no evidence to the contrary exists. Defendant
demands strict proof thereof.

19. Affirmant sees no stated or written legal or lawful authority by any servicer allowing
those servicers to assign the Mortgage in this case exists and Affirmant believes no
evidence to the contrary exists. Defendant demands strict proof thereof.

20. Affirmant sees no verifiable evidence that any servicer in the related case has produced
the procedures and protocols for how data from the prior servicer was not only boarded to
the servicers systems but how any formulas, indexes or algorithms to determine balances
owed, fees owed, interest owed and amounts due exists and Affirmant believes no
evidence to the contrary exists. Defendant demands strict proof thereof.

21. Affirmant sees no verifiable evidence that shows Trustee has verified any data supplied
by the Servicer(s) exists and Affirmant believes no evidence to the contrary exists.
Defendant demands strict proof thereof.

2
22. Affirmant sees no verifiable evidence that the Note and Mortgage were transferred into
the alleged Trust, per New York Laws governing trusts, exists and Affirmant believes no
evidence to the contrary exists. Defendant demands strict proof thereof.

24. Affirmant sees no verifiable evidence that the following documents regarding this alleged
loan exist;
1. Form S3 registration statement
2. Form 424 (b) (5) prospectus for the SEC
3. Form FR 2046 balance sheets
4. Form FR 2049 balance sheets
5. Form FR 2099 balance sheets
and Affirmant believes no evidence to the contrary exists. Affirmant demands strict proof
thereof.

The above evidence would or could be used to possibly establish standing for a debt collector
who is not named to the Note, is not a holder in due course and must be substantiated in order to
invoke the New Mexico Statutes 1978 Uniform Commercial Code, NMRA 1978 and any other
applicable laws, rules, statutes or regulations.

The terms herein shall have the meanings as ascribed to such terms in Blacks Law Dictionary.
Affirmant and Defendant are used interchangeably.

I, Mark F. Coble, Affirmant, upon my full unlimited commercial liability as secured party
creditor, do affirm and say that I have read the above AFFIDAVIT OF SPECIFIC NEGATIVE
AVERMENT and do know the contents to the very best of my knowledge to be true, correct,
complete, and not misleading; the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF executed on the ____ day of June of the year two-thousand and
seventeen.

______________________

Mark F. Coble
Defendant/Affirmant with
All Rights Reserved
4736 Via Verde Ct.
Santa Fe, NM 87507
505-795-9711

3
Acknowledgment

STATE OF NEW MEXICO)

COUNTY OF SANTA FE)

On the ___ day of June in the year 2017, before me, the undersigned, personally appeared
Mark F. Coble, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual whose
name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same
in his capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the individual, or the person upon
behalf of which the individual acted, executed the instrument.

_____________________
Notary Public
NOTARY STAMP Commission expires ________________.