Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
COORDINATION O F N I C K E L A N D C O B A L T W I T H N-
MORPHOLINE OR N,N-DIETHYL, N'-MONOSUBSTITUTED
BENZOYL THIOUREAS
In previous papers, we have reported on the coor- Only three ligands (morph-R-btu-H with R = p-
dination of copper, nickel and cobalt with N,N- C1, p-OMe and p-NO2) have been described in the
disubstituted, N'-benzoyl thioureas. We have literature. 3
shown that the nitrogen substituents do not affect
the nature and the geometry of these compounds 1
and that the redox properties of copper complexes EXPERIMENTAL
are influenced by the benzoyl substituents. 2
We report here on the coordination of nickel All spectroscopic and microanalytical measure-
and cobalt with N,N-diethyl or morpholine, N'- ments have been described previously, l An LC-
substituted benzoyl thioureas (morph-R-btu-H) to 10AS Shimadzu liquid chromatograph with an
show the influence of the benzoyl substituents (elec- SPD-10A Shimadzu UV-Vis detector (254 nm) was
tronic effect, steric constraints, etc.) on these met- used to separate the isomers. The Rosyl 5/~m col-
allic complexes umn was 150 mm long and had a diameter of 4.6
mm. The complexes (1 mg cm -3 in a 70-30 hexane-
ethylacetate mixture) were eluted with a flow rate of
1 cm3 min -1. The ligands were prepared as before2
by condensation of the substituted benzoyl iso-
thiocyanates with the morpholine or the diethyl-
S 0 amine.
2.50
A
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00 k i
Ni(Et_,-p-Br-btu)2 227 42.0 3.8 8.0 1520 Co(Et2-p-Br-btu)3 b 167 42.3 3.7 7.7 1520 O
(41.9) (4.1) (8.1) (43.2) (4.2) (8.4)
Ni(morph-o-OMe-btu)2 . . . . Co(morph-o-OMe-btu)3 . . . . .
Ni (morph-m-OM e-btu)_, 245 50.6 4.5 8.9 1521 Co(morph-m-OMe-btu)3 225 51.8 4.7 9.3 1518
Ni(morph-p-OMe-btu)2 274 50.0 4.6 8.9 1508 Co(morph-p-OMe-btu)3 240 52.0 4.7 9.4 1510
e-*
(50.6) (4.9) (9.1) (52.2) (5.0) (9.4)
Ni(Et2-o-OMe-btu)2 113 52.8 5.7 9.3 1518 Co(Et2-o-OMe-btu)3 . . . .
Ni(Et2-m-OMe-btu)2 122 52.9 5.9 9.4 1519 Co(Et2-m-OMe-btu)3 155 54.9 5.9 9.7 1519
O"
Ni(Et2-p-OMe-btu)2 173 52.8 5.6 9.5 1512 Co(Et2-p-OMe-btu)3 ~ 182 54.5 5.7 9.7 1514 t~
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
10000 14000 18000 r m-1" 22000
Fig. 2. Visible s p e c t r a o f C o ( E t 2 - o - B r - b t u ) 3 c -- 5 10 -4 m o l d m -3 in CH2C12, cell l e n g t h = 1 c m .
* E x p e r i m e n t a l spectra.
0.12
A
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00 ~ ,----- I
10000 14000 18000 r m - 1 22000
Fig. 3. Visible s p e c t r a o f N i ( E t z - o - B r - b t u ) 2 c = 5 10 * m o l d m -3 in CH2C12, cell l e n g t h = 1 c m .
9Experimental spectra.
attractor group as benzoyl substituents. The chemi- presents two signals around 3.6 and 4.0 ppm.
cal shifts of the aromatic ring protons increase with Irradiation at 3.6 or 4.0 ppm shows clearly that the
the electron-withdrawing character of the sub- two ethyl groups are non-equivalent, probably due
stituents and can be arranged in the order 6Uar,,with to the restricted rotation about the thiocarbonyl-
OMe < 6H~yt with C1--~ 6 H without substituent nitrogen bond. The complexation modifies the nat-
< 6Hary,with Br < 6n,ry,with NO2. The complexation ure and the anisotropic effect of the carbon-sulphur
always induces a shift to higher field (0.15 ppm bond which leads to the coalescence of the two
decreasing) for the 3-, 4- and 5-positions. However, - C H 2- signals and the sharpening of the methyl
with meta- and para-derivatives, we observed an resonance.
opposite effect for the 2-,6-positions ; the chemical As we have shown in previous work I for unsym-
shift increasing (+0.40 ppm for the OMe deriva- metrical bidentate ligands, a single resonance for
tive) decreases with the electron-withdrawing the proton is indicative of fat compounds. Thefac-
power of the substituent. configuration of all the complexes studied was con-
Except for the ortho-nitro derivatives, the meth- firmed by the 13C N M R data. The presence of one
ylene proton resonance of the R1, R2 ethyl group peak in the chromatogram was indicative of the
T a b l e 2. IH N M R d a t a for the ligands, nickel(II) a n d c o b a l t ( I I I ) c o m p o u n d s
p a H 2 3
NyN~4
O S 6 5