Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Coastal Management
Publication details, including instructions for authors and
subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ucmg20
To cite this article: Kris Merschrod (1989): In search of a strategy for coastal zone
management in the third world: Notes from ecuador, Coastal Management, 17:1, 63-74
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.
Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-
licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly
forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any
representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The
accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently
verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss,
actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or
howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of
the use of this material.
Coastal Management, Volume 17, pp. 63-74 0892-0753/89 $3.00 + .00
Printed in the U.K. All rights reserved. Copyright 1989 Taylor & Francis
KRIS MERSCHROD
Representative of Private Agencies
Collaborating Together (PACT)
San Jose, Costa Rica
Downloaded by [Cornell University] at 10:33 05 July 2012
Abstract The strategy developed for the University of Rhode Island Coastal Re-
source Management Project in Ecuador is described. This strategy relies on
"working groups'' and differs from traditional coastal zone management planning
strategies prevalent in "First World" countries because of its flexibility and infor-
malityfactors that facilitate maximum participation of interested agencies and con-
stituencies while avoiding institutional rigidity.
Coastal resource management efforts and programs in the United States, Canada, and
Europe (the so-called First World) generally are a response to crises of an ecological
nature, new development initiatives that threaten a style of life, natural calamities, and,
in some cases, federal legislation and funding encouraging states to implement programs.
Under "crisis" circumstances, it is often the case that a small segment of the popula-
tion mobilizes interested citizens to move public officials into actionwhat may be
called a "popular movement." In the case of federally sponsored programs, professional
planning segments of state governments initiate action. In either situation, to maintain
momentum and establish CZM programs, certain adjunct activities are neededpublic
education, training for officials and employees, legal counsel, a thorough profile of the
coastal area, and fundraising.
Public education is needed to expand the constituency and keep people up-to-date on
activities in the coastal area. A large part of the public education program is to increase
public awareness of the effort that the program is making and the benefits to the public
from program activities.
Training is required to assure that program personnel and related officials can accu-
rately assess the impacts of project proposals and ongoing activities in the coastal zone.
In many cases, technical personnel need additional training in, for example, a holistic,
systematic, or ecological perspective to engineering or cost/benefit analysis.
Legal counsel is needed to review the existing statutes, suggest alternatives, and pre-
pare legislation. In addition, good legal counsel may provide advice on alternatives and
facilitate access to the "structure" through contacts.
A thorough profile of the coastal zone is a sine qua non for a management program.
Generally the initial coastal management efforts lack information, but, due to the crisis
63
64 Kris Met sehr od
nature of the initial effort, work must begin with the information at hand. Ideally, a
complete inventory of the issues, constituencies, natural resources, development plans,
and history of development should be at hand to limit conflict, avoid errors, and the like.
But when this desired inventory is not available, one must begin with the issue and work
toward a sustainable management program based on broader issues.
Fundraising is necessary to provide for salaries, offices, transportation, printing, and
advertising. At the initial stages, these may come from voluntary efforts, but, eventually,
substantial fundraising or funding commitment is necessary.
Given the general model of CZM strategy in the context of the First World, it is relevant
to ask "Can it be applied to the Third World?" or, more specifically, "What can be done
Downloaded by [Cornell University] at 10:33 05 July 2012
in Ecuador?"
Meltzoff and LiPuma (1986) have suggested a three-step "comparative method to
implement CZM from the perspective of the local society":
This advice has been standard for the implementation of socioeconomic programs since
the early 1960s, but it does not offer a strategy for actual implementation. The remainder
of this article outlines the strategy that the author, as the in-country project manager,
implemented during the first year of the University of Rhode Island Coastal Resource
Management Project in Ecuador. The assessment of the prevailing political economy is
included as background, and the facilitated local solutions are described.
The strategy employed can be described as an informal working group concept. The
project was seen as "legitimate" because of the positions and titles of those who found it
in their interest, economically and sociopolitically, to become involved. It was funded by
the Agency for International Development (USAID), USAID/Ecuador (USAID/E), and
the Government of Ecuador (GOE). The project offered interested parties neutral territory
where problems and possible solutions could be discussed.
There is a bilateral history of proposal and response between the Office of Science
and Technology AID/Washington (S&T) via USAID/E and the GOE. This initiative
began after the El Nino crisis of 1982/83, but it should not be considered a response to
that crisis on the part of the GOE or USAID. The initiative from S&T had a much
broader conceptual base with longer time horizons than a response to crisis. Through the
URI program, S&T planned to have CZM programs in Ecuador, Sri Lanka, and Thai-
land. Nevertheless, the crisis probably did sensitize both the GOE and USAID/E to
coastal issues, given the socioeconomic crisis that the 1982/83 El Nino season repre-
sented for Ecuador and the considerable effort on the part of USAID/E to support rehabil-
itation. If the GOE or USAID/E had not responded to the S&T initiative, then the CRMP
would have been established elsewhere in Latin America without reference to El Nino.
Third World Coastal Zone Management 65
cratic" governments are perceived to be within this ideal. In the Third World, however,
the cultural and governance traditions are different. Understanding this difference is cru-
cial when attempting to design a Third World CZM strategy.
would be "but that is not permitted by the law," or "someone else is in line ahead of
you," or "that is not in the public interest."
The "shrimp industry crisis" was the first issue called to the attention of the URI CRMP
staff by official GOE communication. From 1984 through 1986, the crisis was a complex
of problems headed by a shortage of larvae for stocking ponds. The constituency in-
volved in this crisis is the mariculture industry. During 1986 and 1987, closed seasons
were established by the GOE to try to increase the availability of natural shrimp larvae.
Although the scientific validity of this approach was unproven, it was a response to the
constituency demand to "do something." The URI CRMP approach to this problem was
to support larval and population dynamics studies at the Institute Nacional ded Pesca
Downloaded by [Cornell University] at 10:33 05 July 2012
(INP), and to develop a CRMP program to reduce shrimp larvae mortality from capture
to pond.
A related issue is the destruction of mangroves for the placement of mariculture
ponds. The constituency includes the ecologically aware members of the public and some
members of the shrimp mariculture and shrimp trawler industries who believe that the
mangroves are important shrimp nursery areas. This issue is under the jurisdiction of the
forestry division of the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock. From a legal perspective,
there is considerable overlap of the respective jurisdictions of the ministries of com-
merce, agriculture, and defense. Because of the perceived impact of mangrove clearing,
an ambitious national mangrove management plan will be drawn up by a select com-
mittee. A working group of legal advisers has been meeting at the undersecretarial level
to examine the issue from a CZM perspective.
There are potentially major gains to be made through these planning efforts. For
example, an interesting possibility exists for investigation of the use of mangroves in
shrimp ponds. Shrimp producers with mangroves in their ponds in Manabi and Esmer-
aldas are willing to work on these studies. This effort has been presented to the USAID/E
forestry project and the result of this type of research could increase productivity on
farms while reducing the capital investment required. Positive results of this type would
underscore the utility of mangroves and lead to their conservation in a way that planning
cannot.
A third issue, the exploration for oil and gas in the Gulf of Guayaquil and elsewhere,
is a long-standing one. This issue arises from time to time and has been the basis for the
oil spill contingency planning. The environmentally aware members of the public are the
constituency with specific government agency (CEPE and Marina Mercante) awareness,
too. This planning has been an important part of the permanent commission of the South
Pacific activity, but the essence of this plan is the assignment of legal authority and, in
the case of a spill, the process to identify the responsible party for damages. Implementa-
tion in the form of cleanup teams and equipment has yet to be accomplished.
; Along the coast are problems that arise from the growth of human settlements in
dynamic areas of the coastal zone. This has led to erosion problems along the dunes and
flooding problems behind the dunes because the public and builders do not understand
the seasonality of the sites (seasonal lagoons and flood plains) or the processes of the
coast. The constituencies are scattered and very locally defined.
An important issue along the central coast is the shortage of water from human con-
sumption and for agricultural purposes. The Santa Elena Peninsula, and nearly all of
68 Kris Merschrod
Manabi, are arid most of the year with a short and uncertain rainy season. For this
reason, they are agriculturally marginal, but with irrigation they can be very productive,
as seen in the old irrigation areas along the Portoviejo River in Manabi, as well as along
the tributaries of the Guayas River during the dry season. The constituency here is both
the urban and agricultural sectors, and this is a very important issue in coastal politics.
Public works projects and international loans for these projects are extensive.
Other issues, not generally recognized in Ecuador, are: (1) water quality from the
point of view of mariculture, (2) land tenure of communal lands vis a vis encroachment
by agricultural and maricultural interests, (3) urban sprawl and accompanying pollution
into rivers and estuaries, and (4) the intensification of agriculture and the resulting im-
pacts on other species.
These issues are well known in First World CZM, where some programs have under-
taken substantial tasks with inspiring results, e.g., the cleanup of the Androscoggin River
in Maine. Although it appears sensible to build upon the knowledge and accomplish-
Downloaded by [Cornell University] at 10:33 05 July 2012
ments of the First World, Third World strategy must avoid working solely from the
conceptual level. It should begin with a specific problem as defined by a particular con-
stituency and related to the cost of the problem to that constituency. Although some of
these will be "mini-crises," the basic elements necessary for action are therean issue
and related constituency.
A Commission on Environmental Quality (CEQ) was established in the early 1970s. The
political basis for its formation is unclear, but it held one or two meetings in 1974. Its
purpose was to promote integrated resource management and to watch over environ-
mental quality, precisely the role that the CRMP is to play. In the case of the CRMP/E, a
decree established this role for the present counterpart, the Environmental Affairs Office
of the Ministry of Energy and Mines. At the time of the establishment of the CEQ, there
Third World Coastal Zone Management 69
was not a movement or constituency that could obtain funds to sustain and develop the
organization. Nevertheless, during the first Ecuadorean Environmental Congress (1987),
a j representative of an agency that was part of the CEQ pointed out that the CEQ had
jurisdiction in this area and that the Environmental Affairs Office of the Ministry of
Energy and Mines (the URI counterpart) could not assume authority.
This foundation was created by decree during August 1986, using a model similar to the
Science and Technology Foundation, which was created to assume the financial and
administrative responsibility of INIAP (National Agricultural Research Institute).1 The
foundation was planned with the idea that international and local funds (private and gov-
ernment) could be found to support research and extension for the bioaquatic industry.
Downloaded by [Cornell University] at 10:33 05 July 2012
: In one aspect, the structure of the Bisaquatre Foundation is not unlike that of the
GRMP, i.e., the board of directors consists of key members of government agencies
related to the resources. It differs, however, because the board of the foundation has a
strong and diverse representation from the private sector. At the same time, this broad
industry representation may be a weakness. Although the board's scope of interest in-
cludes the shrimp mariculture industry and its problems, it may represent too many con-
stituencies (offshore shrimp vs. shrimp mariculture) for it to form a cohesive group.
What seems to be lacking is a "cause" or unifying task to begin operations or to "galva-
nize" all constituencies. As of March 1987, sufficient financial support had not been
found to begin operations, but the Chamber of Shrimp Producers offered to provide
office space and the use of their computer, telex, and phone.
The B-F was supported by the previous undersecretary of fisheries, but the present
undersecretary has not been as active in promoting it. Part of the reason for this change
may be based on climatic changes and the resulting biological impacts and related tech-
nological changes. The shrimp larvae shortage was a crisis from 1983/84 to 1986/87, but
the shortage disappeared with the buildup in shrimp hatcheries and the moderately strong
El Nino of 1986/87. Since the B-F was conceived and formed prior to this date (and the
change in ministers coincided with this date), the loss of ministerial interest may be
related to climatic changes.
Extended family interests may also be an important variable in this change of focus.
The extended family of the previous undersecretary had extensive interests in the shrimp
mariculture industry. Although the present undersecretary's extended family has some
shrimp mariculture interests, the offshore fisheries interests are much stronger and of
much longer history. For this reason, when the new undersecretary expressed interest in
postharvest losses of fish and improving the domestic marketing of fish, it reflected not
only a national dietary need, but also a producer need.
management. Their focus is the development of river resources. MRP also has urban
development and infrastructure activities.
Both efforts have focused on irrigation systems as the major infrastructure works. In
Manabi the arid Portoviejo River Valley had an old irrigation system. The new irrigation
facilities works included a dam (also for drinking water) and irrigation on both sides of
the river. This system was particularly hard hit during the 1982/83 Nino before it began
operation. By 1986 it was almost entirely rebuilt. The constituency in Manabi has been
very hard driving, and because of its high indices of poverty and strong, vocal politics, it
has been able to maintain a flow of resources, helped by the crisis of 1982/83.
The case of the CEDEGE is more interesting because it represents almost 50 years of
dreams and plans for potable and irrigation water on the arid Santa Elena Peninsula.
Under the present administration, coastal interests dominate. A review of CEDEGE
land-use zoning and land tenure shows that land previously zoned for irrigated agriculture
has been used for shrimp mariculture. The zoning plan was changed to reflect this reality
Downloaded by [Cornell University] at 10:33 05 July 2012
and less attractive agricultural land was used to fill the area needs. The land tenure
reveals that much of the agricultural zone is owned by shrimp maricultural interests. In a
capital-short situation, it is easy to conclude that these interests will continue in shrimp
rather than in investment in irrigated agriculture. The relative rates of return on invest-
ment also indicate that additional capital would go into shrimp mariculture rather than
irrigated agriculture. Thus here is a pre-existing development plan that has been outdated
by technology, yet the CEDEGE has become a constituency in itself, having some agri-
cultural and political value, and it has not adjusted to the current situation. In addition,
aside from the freshwater needs of Guayaquil, the downstream ecological impacts have
not been addressed. At the time of design, the ecological impact was studied in the
containment areathe mariculture industry was just beginning and the ecological link
was not seen. Now the impact of fertilizer and pesticide runoff could affect 60 percent of
Ecuador's mariculture production.
From these examples, two concepts emerge that are important for planning in
Ecuador: (1) planning is driven by specific interest groups, and (2) a comprehensive
ecological view is needed for planning.
The points mentioned so far in this discussion raise the question, "What can be the
beginning for CZM in Ecuador?" If a straightforward governmental decision cannot as-
sure the establishment of a program, much less its maintenance, what can be done? Here
the emphasis is on program and not structure, because structures can be created by law
and decree, but little is to be accomplished in Ecuador if there is no constituency backing
for maintenance. The government does respond to immediate concerns of constituencies
with "pull" even in the face of limited public resources.
By undertaking tasks in the form of informal working groups, the interested parties
were brought together to do the following: (1) "test" state agencies to see how inter-
agency networks could be established, (2) see how overlapping jurisdictions could be
worked out, (3) determine how resources could be combined, (4) identify the positions of
new policymakers, and (5) examine how constituencies could be satisfied or combined.
From experience with the issues, the interested CZM-related agencies are identified
and the abilities assessed and built up. From this base a more formal structure may
evolve, but the immediate goal is to maintain informal working groups to bring the inter-
ested parties together. If this strategy works, it may be that a "free" or autonomous
group that can obtain funds for specific issues would be all the structure that is needed or
can be developed for CZM under current political circumstances in Ecuador. The legal/
institutional analysis done during the first year of the URICRMP shows, clearly, that one
agency cannot control the others nor can it obtain the jurisdiction. Freedom from routine
responsibilities would enable program facilitators to concentrate on the current issues and
attract resources from private and public sources.
Downloaded by [Cornell University] at 10:33 05 July 2012
If a CZM program assumes a policy and management role, then, as the issues in-
crease, the program must expand and the bureaucratic burden may overcome the flexi-
bility needed to address key issues. On the other hand, if a CZM program tackles specific
issues, brings together the interested parties, works on the issues at the implementing
level, and leaves the interested parties in charge of the issue, then the CZM program
could maintain its flexibility.
With this approach, cues are taken from the crisis mode by taking on the small tasks
and needs of constituencies rather than trying to deal with societywide crises. Neverthe-
less, the crisis mode must be combined with a planning mode by bringing the issues and
related constituencies before established agencies responsible for research and action.
The difficulty with this approach is that responding to varied needs and tasks may not
provide the conceptual foundation that is needed to create a structured program. If this is
the case, then a major objective of projects such as URI CRMP, CZM will not be
achieved, i.e., the creation of structure and program. In the meanwhile, however, issues
related coastal resources will be managed, and this is the overall goal of CZM.
rently highly visible because of its political and economic power and because it is part of
the most recent and dynamic force that has appeared on the Ecuador coast since the
banana, cacao, oil, and poultry booms. Development of this industry is the key issue in
the coastal economy because of the employment opportunities it creates along the entire
coast. The area occupied by the industry was, with notable exception,2 not used before. It
opened new frontiers geographically, in export commodities, and in economic opportu-
nity for a large segment of the coastal population. This has brought with it new economic
and political power and has strengthened existing power bases.
The political power of the industry is importantvirtually all the political parties and
all branches of the armed forces are involved in the industry. On the Sierra Costa level,
coastal people began the industry, but the Sierra interests were not far behind in acquiring
holdings.
This new industry had an important problem from 1984 through 1987 that was a
constraint on its development and a bottleneck for the present investment. There was a
Downloaded by [Cornell University] at 10:33 05 July 2012
scarcity of larvae for the stocking demands of the ponds created. This shortage has been
seen as a financial crisis for the industry and the government. Because of this, the constit-
uency called on the government to help solve the problem. When the URI CRM project
was starting, high government officials asked that priority be given to working on this
problem, and thus it was identified as a crisis.
The URI CRMP began work on the shortage of larvae by examining the area where
immediate gains were possible: the reduction of larval mortality between capture and the
ponds. However, this was sufficient only to gain the attention of the constituency. To
build toward a program with more complex resources management goals and a broader
constituency is the longer range task.
As mentioned previously, the moderate Nino of 1986/87 alleviated this shortage. In
fact, the hatchery industry sought a longer closed season on larval fisheries because the
oversupply depressed the demand and the price for hatchery larvae. This, however, is a
transitory problem because the development of new and vacant ponds will use the supply.
Coping with the "Nino" cycle in terms of larval availability will be an interesting CZM
challenge for years to come.
The shrimp industry is a principal constituency of CZM because of its socioeconomic
and political power. In 1987 the Shrimp Producers Association of Guayas, US AID/
Ecuador, a maricultural consultant to the URI CRMP, and the URI in-country project
manager began to design a project to address the issues of the shrimp industry constitu-
ency. This was a substantial opportunity to combine financial resources of the CRMP
with USAID Mission and industry funds at a time of declining funding from USAID and
USAID/E. However, the CRMP director and URI insisted that the role of the CRMP was
to identify and study issues, but not to be directly involved in the implementation of
projects. With this decision, the URI CRMP gave up part of its catalytic role and lost
credibility with USAID/E and this key constituency. It lost the opportunity to show that
the CRMP would follow through the study and recommendations phase to create a
working program. Generally, in the case of university development work overseas, spe-
cifically under Title XII of the Foreign Assistance Act, it appears that land grant colleges
are more comfortable with the "research, plan, and recommend" role than they are with
implementation and the assumption of the corresponding responsibilities. This is impor-
tant because the promotion of CZM for the Third World, as funded by S&T/Washington,
is based on the university link.
The major goal of the CRMP was the establishment of a program. To be successful as
Third World Coastal Zone Management 73
ajprogram, the follow through should include the establishment of "stand-along" pro-
grams. After all, these groups are potential allies on other issues, but if a reputation as a
"starter only" is established, little support can be expected from constituencies in the
future.
The shrimp industry is dependent upon the natural biological processes of marine/
land interface. It is in the midst of the aquatic food chain. It depends on the quality of
water. The source of its feed and product is the interaction of salt and fresh waters and the
nutrients that are carried by them. It occupies a niche into which the society empties its
waste products. Every activity in Ecuador west of the continental divide contributes to or
detracts from the shrimp mariculture industry. This watershed area includes practically
all the manufacturing, agriculture, and mining in the country. The impact of this activity
affects the entire coast. Thus any environmental impact that may be of concern anywhere
in the country is most probably a concern to the shrimp mariculture industry. Any irritant
to urban or rural dwellers can be an irritant to the shrimp mariculture industry.
Downloaded by [Cornell University] at 10:33 05 July 2012
Conclusion
An example from the URI CRMP shrimp subproject illustrates the linkage of issues. The
Chamber of Shrimp Producers was presented with the example of pesticide contamina-
tion in Panama and a few results from water samples from the Ecuadorean coast. The
Chamber showed an immediate concern for water and feed quality. It realized that, as an
association, it could monitor feed quality by means of laboratory testing. Thus the
members, as consumers, could control their suppliers. Maintaining feed quality could be
a government rule, but this would require the development of trust in the government
institutions charged with sampling, testing, and reporting. Most likely, it would be more
expensive than the private program.
| Water quality protection could also be a government role. But the shrimp producers
could sample their own intakes and finance their own testing for parameters that are of
interest to them. As their needs change, they, as a small group, can change their testing/
sampling quickly. At the present time, the industry does not pay taxes to support a gov-
ernment effort. A water quality board at the national level would have to respond to a
very broad constituency.
If chemical contamination is detrimental to the shrimp industry, then others depen-
dent on a healthy ecosystem will also be concerned. The Nature Foundation has been
working on aspects of pesticide contamination and developing a constituency on this
issue for several years. Constituencies concerned with chemical contamination could join
forces and become sufficiently influential to bring about changes. This was the basis for
the working group strategy used to implement the URI CRMP.
The maintenance of a CZM program will be an ongoing battle, but if the issues are
linked to an active partnership with the constituencies, support will be assured.
74 Kris Merschrod
Notes
1. The Science and Technology Foundation is yet another example of a relatively new mode of
USAID operation overseas. These foundations are a manifestation of: (1) U.S. government "faith"
in the private sector to manage what have been government functions, and (2) frustration with the
previously AID funded ministries to implement programs that respond to the needs of broad constit-
uencies, e.g., fanners. Thus one observes S&T foundations for the agricultural sector as AID
projects in Ecuador, Honduras, Bolivia, Costa Rica, etc. It is a continuation of "institution
building," but now with private sector boards rather than public ministerial control. The Bioaquatic
Foundation built upon this model (one of the leaders of this effort is the brother of an ex-minister of
agriculture who supported the S&T Foundation).
2. The most notable exception is the case of the forced eviction of a community that held the
land by common law on an island in the Gulf of Guayaquil. These people used the mangroves for
fishing, wood, and shellfish. In other areas, one notes that areas around ponds are "off limits" to
people who once fished there. Also, agricultural lands are now being converted to pondsareas
observed are both seasonal pasture and crop lands.
Downloaded by [Cornell University] at 10:33 05 July 2012
References
Hurtado, Osvaldo. 1980. Political Power in Ecuador. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico
Press.
Meltzoff, Sarah K., and Edward LiPuma. 1986. "Economy of Coastal Zone Management: Shrimp
Mariculture in Ecuador." Coastal Zone Management Journal 14(4): 349-380.
Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
Perez, E. et al. 1986. "The Legal and Institutional Framework for Farmed Shrimp Management in
Ecuador." Paper presented at the Workshop on Development Strategy for a Sustainable
Shrimp Mariculture Industry. Guayaquil, Ecuador, 4 - 8 August.
Sanchez, R. 1982. "The Andean Economic System and Capitalism." In Ecology and Exchange in
the Andes, David Lehmann (ed.). London: Cambridge University Press.