GT Fuel Heating PDF

This tutorial is a PowerPoint file which
includes recorded narration. Automatic

slide sequencing is coupled to the sound track.
For the most effective use, please ensure that

your computer is equipped with a sound card
and that it is activated.
If you cannot hear this message from your

computers speakers, please connect them.
Should there be an excessive delay between

slides, press the spacebar to proceed.
Effect of Fuel Gas Heating

on
Power Plant Performance
One technique utilized to enhance combined cycle power plant
performance is to heat the gas turbine fuel gas.
Heat is extracted from somewhere in the cycle and used to
raise the temperature of the fuel yielding an improvement in
net plant heat rate.
Typically, this technique is employed where efficiency is a
key factor, and advanced gas turbines have firing temperatures
above 2300F (1260C) are used. Additionally, many DLE
combustion systems require fuel at moderately high temperatures
www.petroadnesh.com ehsan.saadati@yahoo.com
1
Siemens-Westinghouse 501F gas turbine with
turbine cooling air pre-cooler
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
We will now evaluate three different techniques to improve
plant efficiency by heating the gas turbines fuel
1. Use of turbine cooling air precooler as source
2. Use of IPE water as source
3. Split turbine cooling air pre-cooler source
portion to heat fuel, balance to IPB
Assume fuel supply is at 77F and heated to be delivered

to control valve at 365F
11
FUEL
Heat
Rejection
12
365
100
13
FUEL
IPE2
Deaerator
14
15
100

3. Split turbine cooling air precooler source
portion to heat fuel, balance to IPB
FUEL
IPE 2
IPS 1
16
100
100
17
18
Summary Spreadsheet
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4

Project Cost Summary Reference Cost Reference Cost D D % Reference Cost D D % Reference Cost D D %
I Specialized Equipment 69,373,500 69,601,350 227,850 69,545,750 172,250 69,939,600 566,100
II Other Equipment 2,716,833 2,716,413 -420 2,729,076 12,243 2,732,037 15,204
III Civil 3,105,812 3,105,801 -11 3,116,835 11,023 3,130,552 24,740
IV Mechanical 8,227,002 8,177,002 -50,000 8,215,886 -11,116 8,251,252 24,250
V Electrical 463,867 463,867 0 463,607 -260 466,109 2,242
VI Buildings & Structures 3,219,230 3,218,810 -420 3,222,544 3,314 3,232,951 13,721
VII Engineering & Plant Startup 5,944,505 5,943,505 -1,000 5,937,251 -7,254 5,968,417 23,911
Subtotal - Contractor's Internal Cost 93,050,749 93,226,747 175,998 93,230,949 180,200 93,720,918 670,169
VIII Contractor's Soft & Miscellaneous Costs 11,801,301 11,816,283 14,982 11,829,528 28,226 11,886,873 85,571
Contractor's Price 104,852,050 105,043,031 190,980 105,060,477 208,427 105,607,790 755,740
IX Owner's Soft & Miscellaneous Costs 9,436,685 9,453,873 17,188 9,455,443 18,758 9,504,701 68,017
Total - Owner's Cost 114,288,735 114,496,903 208,168 114,515,920 227,185 115,112,491 823,756
Net Plant Output 265 264 -1 264 -1 267 2

Cost per kW - Contractor's 396 398 2 398 2 396 0
Cost per kW - Owner's 431 434 2 434 2 431 0
GT Output - kW 180,042 179,952 -90 -0.05% 179,952 -90 -0.05% 179,952 -90 -0.05%
ST Output - kW 89,572 89,526 -46 -0.05% 88,946 -626 -0.70% 91,617 2,045 2.28%
Net Plant Output - kW 264,614 264,480 -134 -0.05% 263,869 -745 -0.28% 266,530 1,916 0.72%
Net Plant Heat Rate - BTU/KWH (LHV) 6,280 6,230 -50 -0.80% 6,245 -35 -0.56% 6,182 -98 -1.56%
No fuel heating Fuel heating from precooler - Fuel heating from from IPE2 only - Fuel heating from precooler -
balance rejected precooler heat rejected balance to IPB
19
A few words of caution -
Thermoflows predictions of the available CA precooler heat
from a given gas turbine are inferred, not directly obtained from
the vendors specifications, and therefore not as reliable as power,
heat rate, exhaust flow, and exhaust temperature predictions
With this inferred information, the program can estimate the total
amount of heat that the CA precooler can provide, but not the
temperature at which it can be supplied. Generally, the higher
the temperature of the receiving stream to which the heat is
transferred, the smaller is the fraction of the CA precooler heat
that can actually be delivered to that stream.
The user is advised to consult with the gas turbine vendor to
determine if the desired heat recovery from the CA precooler can
be truly achieved with the selected engine.
Fuel Heating Summary

Overall plant net efficiency improves ~ 0.5%.
Gas turbine power is slightly reduced.
Must look at impact of fuel gas heating on all costs -
Gas turbine,
Steam equipment (HRSG, steam turbine,
condenser, piping, etc.),
Civil & Mechanical works,
Installation.
For gas turbines where turbine cooling air pre-coolers are
available, additional steam generating capability
may be utilized to improve steam turbine performance.
Always run Base Case to make true evaluation.
20

GT Fuel Heating PDF

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

GT Fuel Heating PDF

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

This tutorial is a PowerPoint file which

includes recorded narration. Automatic

For the most effective use, please ensure that

If you cannot hear this message from your

Should there be an excessive delay between

Effect of Fuel Gas Heating

Assume fuel supply is at 77F and heated to be delivered

We will now evaluate three different techniques to improve

Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4

Net Plant Output 265 264 -1 264 -1 267 2

Fuel Heating Summary

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi