Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 416

ENG - 2016/1

Application Form
Warning: If your application is incomplete, it will not be accepted
(see Rule 47 of the Rules of Court). Please note in particular that
About this application form Rule 47 § 2 (a) requires that a concise statement of facts,
This form is a formal legal document and may affect your rights complaints and information about compliance with the
and obligations. Please follow the instructions given in the “Notes admissibility criteria MUST be on the relevant parts of the
for filling in the application form”. Make sure you fill in all the application form itself. The completed form should enable the
fields applicable to your situation and provide all relevant Court to determine the nature and scope of the application
documents. without recourse to any other submissions.

Barcode label Reference number


If you have already received a sheet of barcode labels from the If you already have a reference number from the Court in
European Court of Human Rights, please place one barcode label relation to these complaints, please indicate it in the box below.
in the box below.
31061/17

A. The applicant
A.1. Individual A.2. Organisation
This section refers to applicants who are individual persons only. This section should only be filled in where the applicant is a
If the applicant is an organisation, please go to section A.2. company, NGO, association or other legal entity. In this case,
please also fill in section D.1.

1. Surname 10. Name


Raneti

2. First name(s)
Tudor-Andrei 11. Identification number (if any)
3. Date of birth
1 0 1 0 1 9 8 0 e.g. 31/12/1960 12. Date of registration or incorporation (if any)
D D M M Y Y Y Y
e.g. 27/09/2012
4. Place of birth D D M M Y Y Y Y
Focsani, Vrancea, Romania 13. Activity

5. Nationality
Romanian 14. Registered address

6. Address
bd. Unirii 28, ap. 5, Focsani, Vrancea, Romania - it's my
mother's, I don't have an address as a refugee, use my email

7. Telephone (including international dialling code)


15. Telephone (including international dialling code)

8. Email (if any)


tudor.raneti@gmail.com 16. Email
9. Sex ● male female
European Court of Human Rights - Application form 2 / 13

B. State(s) against which the application is directed


17. Tick the name(s) of the State(s) against which the application is directed

ALB - Albania ITA - Italy

AND - Andorra LIE - Liechtenstein

ARM - Armenia LTU - Lithuania

AUT - Austria LUX - Luxembourg

AZE - Azerbaijan LVA - Latvia

BEL - Belgium MCO - Monaco

BGR - Bulgaria MDA - Republic of Moldova

BIH - Bosnia and Herzegovina MKD - "The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"

CHE - Switzerland MLT - Malta

CYP - Cyprus MNE - Montenegro

CZE - Czech Republic NLD - Netherlands

DEU - Germany NOR - Norway

DNK - Denmark POL - Poland

ESP - Spain PRT - Portugal

EST - Estonia ✖ ROU - Romania

FIN - Finland RUS - Russian Federation

FRA - France SMR - San Marino

GBR - United Kingdom SRB - Serbia

GEO - Georgia SVK - Slovak Republic

GRC - Greece SVN - Slovenia

HRV - Croatia SWE - Sweden

HUN - Hungary TUR - Turkey

IRL - Ireland UKR - Ukraine

ISL - Iceland
European Court of Human Rights - Application form 3 / 13

C. Representative(s) of the individual applicant


An individual applicant does not have to be represented by a lawyer at this stage. If the applicant is not represented please go to
section E.
Where the application is lodged on behalf of an individual applicant by a non-lawyer (e.g. a relative, friend or guardian), the non-
lawyer must fill in section C.1; if it is lodged by a lawyer, the lawyer must fill in section C.2. In both situations section C.3 must be
completed.

C.1. Non-lawyer C.2. Lawyer


18. Capacity/relationship/function 26. Surname
full/mother/sign & post lodge - see mandate, annex 24
19. Surname 27. First name(s)
Raneti
20. First name(s) 28. Nationality
Mariana
21. Nationality 29. Address
Romanian
22. Address
bd. Unirii 28, ap. 5, Focsani, Vrancea, Romania

Because my mother's role is to sign and lodge this request


from her address as to not disclose my location to the
Romanian "state" mafia by lodging it from my location you
should correspond with me through my email only
23. Telephone (including international dialling code) 30. Telephone (including international dialling code)
+40743003433
24. Fax 31. Fax

25. Email 32. Email


marianaraneti@yahoo.com

C.3. Authority
The applicant must authorise any representative to act on his or her behalf by signing the first box below; the designated
representative must indicate his or her acceptance by signing the second box below.

I hereby authorise the person indicated above to represent me in the proceedings before the European Court of Human Rights
concerning my application lodged under Article 34 of the Convention.

33. Signature of applicant 34. Date

0 8 0 8 2 0 1 8 e.g. 27/09/2015
D D M M Y Y Y Y

I hereby agree to represent the applicant in the proceedings before the European Court of Human Rights concerning the application
lodged under Article 34 of the Convention.

35. Signature of representative 36. Date

0 8 0 7 2 0 1 8 e.g. 27/09/2015
D D M M Y Y Y Y
European Court of Human Rights - Application form 4 / 13

D. Representative(s) of the applicant organisation


Where the applicant is an organisation, it must be represented before the Court by a person entitled to act on its behalf and in its
name (e.g. a duly authorised director or official). The details of the representative must be set out in section D.1.
If the representative instructs a lawyer to plead on behalf of the organisation, both D.2 and D.3 must be completed.

D.1. Organisation official D.2. Lawyer


37. Capacity/relationship/function (please provide proof) 45. Surname

38. Surname 46. First name(s)

39. First name(s) 47. Nationality

40. Nationality 48. Address

41. Address

42. Telephone (including international dialling code) 49. Telephone (including international dialling code)

43. Fax 50. Fax

44. Email 51. Email

D.3. Authority
The representative of the applicant organisation must authorise any lawyer to act on its behalf by signing the first box below; the
lawyer must indicate his or her acceptance by signing the second box below.

I hereby authorise the person indicated in section D.2 above to represent the organisation in the proceedings before the European
Court of Human Rights concerning the application lodged under Article 34 of the Convention.

52. Signature of organisation official 53. Date

0 8 0 8 2 0 1 8 e.g. 27/09/2015
D D M M Y Y Y Y

I hereby agree to represent the organisation in the proceedings before the European Court of Human Rights concerning the application
lodged under Article 34 of the Convention.

54. Signature of lawyer 55. Date

0 8 0 8 2 0 1 8 e.g. 27/09/2015
D D M M Y Y Y Y
European Court of Human Rights - Application form 5 / 13

Subject matter of the application


All the information concerning the facts, complaints and compliance with the requirements of exhaustion of domestic remedies and
the six-month time-limit laid down in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention must be set out in this part of the application form (sections E,
F and G). It is not acceptable to leave these sections blank or simply to refer to attached sheets. See Rule 47 § 2 and the Practice
Direction on the Institution of proceedings as well as the “Notes for filling in the application form”.

E. Statement of the facts


56.
Rule 39 - I am a permanent refugee since 1st September 2017, fleeing from state terrorism and wrongful political
repression perpetrated through multiple instances of Crimes against humanity committed and attempted by the
Romanian “state” mafia against me, the last attempt being in the form of indefinite to life illegal incarceration (articles 3,
5), Torture (article 3) and Qualified Murder (article 2). See annex 18-21
I was a temporary refugee from 11th April 2017 when the Romanian “state” mafia attempted to commit Crimes against
humanity against me on Orthodox Easter 2017, then I was captured on 27th May 2017 and Crimes against humanity have
been committed against me until 8th June 2017 in the form of Illegal deprivation of liberty (articles 3, 5), Torture (article
3), Bodily Harm (article 3) and attempted Qualified murder (article 2) as proven by annex 11-16
In total the Romanian “state” mafia perpetrated against me between the years 2014-2017 2 Crimes against humanity
committals and 6 Crimes against humanity attempts as objectivized in section I.A.II.1.3.1 of my ICC penal complaint
I am a target of state terrorism, political repression and Crimes against humanity perpetrated by the Romanian “state”
mafia because I am a human rights defender since the year 2009, quality against which the mafia is a natural enemy of. I
was never indicted and convicted of anything as proven by annex 17, nor diagnosed with anything as proven by annex 22
This is typical in the “European” Vrancea county as proven by ECHR case 60113/12 of Mr. Grosu Ulise vs Romania
Nature of urgency: flagrant repeated breaking of the articles 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 and 17 from the Convention
Facts summary as follows, fully detailed in my ICC penal complaint for Crimes against humanity published at address (in
progress): https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity
On 27th October 2014 1st Crimes against humanity were attempted, proven in section I.A.II.1.3.1^1 of my ICC complaint
On the night of 5th to 6th December 2014 Crimes against humanity have been committed against me as proven in
section I.A.II.1.3.1^2 of my ICC penal complaint, including a separate Qualified Murder attempt, and Bodily Harm
Dossier 15730/231/2014 was falsified which could've resulted in Crimes against humanity as between 27th May 2017
and 8th June 2017, but I annulled it as proven in section I.A.II.1.3.1^3 of my ICC complaint
Penal dossier 2417/P/2014 was falsified at the same time with 15730/231/2014, kept secret, then on 10th September
2015 in 10547/231/2015 a mandate was falsified which was executed as state terrorism home breaking on 17th
September 2015 by 4 "masked policemen" and 2 "policemen" mafia soldiers who harassed me 7 hours. See annex 1
On 22nd September 2015 the “prosecutor” from 2417/P/2014 blackmailed my mother on her phone that if she doesn’t
"psychiatrically" incarcerate me, he will falsify an "psychiatric" incarceration order, then he falsified a proposal and got a
falsified decision in 11224/231/1015 which could've resulted in the same situation as between 27th May 2017 and 8th
June 2017, but I annulled it as unfounded on 28th September 2015, as proven in section I.A.II.1.3.1^4. See annex 2,annex 3
On 30th October 2015 the “prosecutor” from 2417/P/2014 after losing, instigated again the "psychiatrist" charlatans to
falsify a psychiatric expertise in my absence which is illegal, which they did on 23rd November 2015. The "expertise"
instead of the conclusion presumes that ~”I’m most probably paranoid (lie)... having no discernment (lie)... because (!?) I
have superior studies, fast thinking and general culture (true)... and judicial history (lie)... and I’m violent (lie)”. See annex 4
On 9th December 2015 using this "psychiatric" charlatanry "expertise" the “prosecutor” from 2417/P/2014 falsified
another proposal that I must be subjected to Crimes against humanity as between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, but
on 5th February 2016 I annulled the proposal from dossier no 14277/231/2015 as inadmissible. See annex 5
On 11th December 2015 I was illegally detained by the “judge” from 14277/231/2015 3 hours after I've been arrested by
2 "gendarmes" from my mother's home, not receiving a subpoena as legally required as to impede me building a defense
by bringing me to the courthouse in the last possible moment without being informed of anything.
On 10th February 2016 another “prosecutor” without active quality falsified an appeal in 14277/231/2015. See annex 7
On 18th May 2016, same “prosecutor” who falsified the appeal in 14277/231/2015, in cahoots with a “judge” who for
falsifying decisions of cover-up, illegally obtained my complaints about the “prosecutor’s” acts in 2417/P/2014, dossiers
2220/91/2015 and 1560/231/2016, and at the same time falsified 2845/P/2016 penal dossier against me. See annex 8.
On 24th June 2016 in 14277/231/2015 "prosecutor’s" falsified appeal, after harassing me for hours to provoke me and
failing another "judge" falsified penal dossiers 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 against me anyway. See annex 9.
On 7th July 2016, "prosecutor's appeal" 14277/231/2015 was rejected as unfounded at Vrancea Tribunal. See annex 10
In summer and autumn of 2016 in penal dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 the "judiciary bodies"
falsified the ordinances in rem, in personam and lastly putting into motion the penal action as judicial harassment, then
finally falsified again an impossible proposal that I be psychiatrically examined without my consent and cooperation.
European Court of Human Rights - Application form 6 / 13

Statement of the facts (continued)


57.
I can't attach proofs from 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 because I was denied the right to make copies
On 5th April 2017 a mandate was falsified in 4791/231/2017 which was executed as state terrorism home breaking on
6th April 2017 by 2 "masked policemen" and 2 "policemen" mafia soldiers who harassed me 2 hours. See annex 11
On 10th April 2017 same “judge” who falsified 10547/231/2015 and 4791/231/2017, falsified a mandate in
4909/231/2017 which was executed as state terrorism home breaking on 10th April 2017 by 9 "gendarme" mafia soldiers
who dragged me out of my house in sleeping clothes, provoking me with physical abuse while filming me. They brought
me in the courthouse in the last possible moment to not allow me to build a defense in 4909/231/2017. See annex 12
After I became a refugee on 11th April 2017 fleeing from the mafia's soldiers, on 13th and 14th April 2017 "policemen"
and "gendarmes" mafia soldiers still broke into my mother’s apartment threatening her they will break into her apartment
daily until they find me to commit Crimes against humanity against me, for which reason my mother has fallen ill with
Zoster Area from stress and trauma. The mafia's obvious plan was to Qualifiedly Murder me during Orthodox Easter 2017
On 14th April 2017 the first “judge” in 4909/231/2017 appeal I’ve made demanded in contradictory to the presumption
of innocence as medieval trials went that "I prove that I'm not the devil”, or that I prove I’m mentally sane which I actually
did since 2015 in all dossiers using 4 legal medicine certificates from work, a certificate from my family doctor, proof that
I'm army incorporable and apt for superior studies - see annex 22. Never indicted and convicted also is proof. See annex 13
On 27th April 2017 my mother was also accosted by two mafia "secret policemen" soldiers who told lies to my mother
trying to find out where I am. They all refused illegally to tell who they were and communicate the falsified mandates
On 18th May 2017 a second “judge” appeared in file 4909/231/2017 unjustified as he appeared in 14277/231/2015 in
2nd instance where 4 judges changed the dossier illegally between them, and falsified the decision. See annex 14
On 27th May 2017 I was arrested from my law faculty exams by 3 mafia "secret police" soldiers who incarcerated me in
the Focsani "psychiatric" charlatanry gulag where 5 of the "psychiatrist" torturers were waiting for me - clearly instigated
by the mafia, torturers who violently tied me up to an operating table and put me in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days
injecting me daily with deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins without treatment, then after I survived forced me under
threat of violence to take another type of deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins until 8th June 2017, which constitute
Crimes against humanity as I've objectivized in section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal complaint. See annex 16, annex 21
On 21st June 2017 in falsified decision from 1779/91/2017 regarding the extraordinary appeal in annulment against the
falsified decision from 18th May 2017 from 4909/231/2017 who could've prevented the Crimes against humanity from
between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 from occurring, the mafia's hubris "motivation" is that, I quote translating in
English: "the complainant is free from now on as long as hospitals and other courthouses permit", which has nothing to do
with 1779/91/2017, 4909/231/2017 or anything, and despite the fact I was never indicted, convicted or psychiatrically
examined thus I am legally presumed innocent and sane as factually proven anyway, and this is for the mafia, I quote again
translating into English: "The purpose has been reached". See annex 15 and section I.B.5 from my ICC penal complaint
On 1st September 2017 I’ve received a falsified prosecutor's ordinance from 1st August 2017 for closing the connected
penal dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2015 and 4329/P/2016, with the proposal that I be subjected to Crimes against
humanity as between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017. See annex 18 and section I.B.4 from my ICC penal complaint
On 11th October 2017 the decision was falsified in 12718/231/2017 as I anticipated, that I be subjected to Crimes
against humanity for the crimes and diagnosis of a person named Vasilache Daniel not connected to me, because I was
never indicted, convicted or psychiatrically examined. See annex 19 and section I.B.3 from my ICC penal complaint
On 2nd February 2018 the decision against my appeal in 12718/231/2017 was falsified as I anticipated, and the falsified
documents annulled in 14277/231/2015 were invoked. See annex 19 and section I.B.2 from my ICC penal complaint
In conclusion because the articles 38 and 109 from the Romanian Penal Code regarding the non-punishment clause of
irresponsibility and security measures respectively refer to convicts not the accused, and because I was never indicted and
convicted as proven in annex 17, annex 18 and annex 19, the Romanian "state" mafia clearly attempted again to execute
me extrajudiciarily and stop me from denouncing its criminal activity through Crimes against humanity as I objectivized in
annex 21 and my ICC penal complaint linked above. Because the Romanian "state" mafia foolishly forewarned me again
through its last falsified cover-up story, and because it lost any shred of plausible deniability through the committal of
Crimes against humanity against me between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, it forced me to become a permanent
refugee fleeing in fear of indefinite to life illegal imprisonment, Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualified Murder, being however
perpetually in danger of being captured and liquidated which perpetually motivates the actuality of this Rule 39 ECHR
urgent request for interim measures through which nature I urge ECHR to obligate Romania to repeal all legislation
infringing the presumption of innocence to at least eliminate the obviously falsified as is cover up stories in which at least
the Romanian "state" mafia believes, finding comfort in the psychosis that falsified documents defends them from judicial
punishment, and overturn the Constitutional Court decision 25/19th January 2017 that anyone innocent and sane can be
subjected to Crimes against humanity through illegal use of the "psychiatry" charlatanry as a weapon of political repression
European Court of Human Rights - Application form 7 / 13

Statement of the facts (continued)


58.
In annex 23 I've summarily explicated the situation, and fully objectivized it in my ICC penal complaint because I lost all
trust in ECHR, CoE and EU because I've notified all competent committees from ECHR, CoE and EU regarding anti-
corruption, torture prevention and civil rights and liberties, who did nothing demonstrating the Romanian "state" mafia
Crimes against humanity are instigated and covered-up by CoE and EU, as proven by the fact mafia agents posing as ECHR
registrars already illegally destroyed this Rule 39 EHCR urgent request for interim measures 6 times since I filed it the first
time on 18th April 2017 and was destroyed on 26th April 2017, which could've prevented the Crimes against humanity
from between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, and could've prevented me becoming a permanent refugee since 1st
September 2017, for which I opened a penal dossier which I also published and keep updated at address: https://
www.scribd.com/document/365438323/penal-complaint-against-D-Lupu-and-I-Banu-at-European-Court-of-Human-Rights

- Please ensure that the information you include here does not exceed the pages allotted -
European Court of Human Rights - Application form 8 / 13
F. Statement of alleged violation(s) of the Convention and/or Protocols and relevant arguments
59. Article invoked Explanation
Article 1 Romania infringed on all of the following articles
Article 2 The Romanian “state” mafia committed against me since the year 2014 2 Crimes
against humanity committals and 6 Crimes against humanity attempts, as objectivized in
sections I.A.II.1.3.1^2 and I.B.22, respectively I.A.II.1.3.1^7 and I.B.6, and I.A.I.1-2 from
my ICC penal complaint
Article 3 The Romanian “state” mafia committed Crimes against humanity against me in the
night between 5th to 6th December 2014, and between 27th May 2017 and 8th June
2017, and 5 other attempts. The felony of Torture is assimilated in Crimes against
humanity. Tens of mafia soldiers meaning “masked police”, “police”, “secret police” and
gendarmes” committed state terrorism against me through multiple illegal home
breaking and arrest on 17th September 2015, 11th December 2015 and 6th, 10th, 13th,
14th, 27th April 2017, and on 27th May 2017 3 “secret police” mafia soldiers illegally
arrested me from my law faculty exams and incarcerated me in the Focsani
“psychiatric” gulag where I was tied to an operating table by 5 “psychiatric” torturers
and put into anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days through deadly fluorine and chlorine
neurotoxic injections, then forced from 3rd day to take other deadly fluorine and
chlorine neurotoxins as proven by annex 16, annex 21 and section A.II.1.3.1 of my ICC
penal complaint
Article 5 (a-b) are not applicable because I was repeatedly deprived of liberty illegally as I’ve
proven summarily in annex 23 section I regarding explanatory notes
Article 6 The right to a fair trial within a reasonable time according paragraph 1 has been fully
infringed upon in all penal dossiers falsified against me, and in all actions derived from
them - there is no law implicitly term the Romanian "state" mafia does not callously
break on purpose, defying the rule of law. In 4909/231/2017 the "judge" even had the
hubris to declare publicly he "restricts my right to my defense". The right to defense has
been infringed in all forms foreseen by the Convention by the Romanian "judicial
bodies"; first, by not being allowed to consult or make copies from the falsified dossiers
2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 against me according to
paragraph 3 letter a; second, by being illegally arrested and brought in the last moment
in the courthouse to not be allowed to build a defense and as state terrorism, on 11th
December 2015 in dossier 14277/231/2015 and on 10th April 2017 in dossier
4909/231/2017, respectively under threat of illegal arrest, Torture, Bodily Harm and
Qualified Murder I couldn't consult dossiers 4909/231/2017, 1779/91/2017 and
12718/231/2017 in person at the courthouse archive, according to paragraph 3 letter
b; third, the Romanian "state" mafia imposed illegally their associate "lawyers" who
committed the felony of Unloyal assistance or representancy by lying I am irresponsible
and cannot defend myself which my ECHR and ICC petitions alone prove I can better
than any law practitioner I ever heard of; fourth, in the falsified dossiers against me no
witness I proposed was ever heard, nor any of my proofs administered for that matter,
and for example in the dossier against interloper Herghelegiu Danut regarding the 1st
Qualified Murder attempt from 27th October 2014, the witnesses were coerced into
false testimony that even so proven my penal complaint, and none of my proven penal
complaints for false testimony and the "judiciary bodies" influencing their declarations
were ever solved, according to paragraph 3 letter d.
Article 7 “Judiciary bodies” in 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016
accused me of deeds that do not physically exist and cannot physically exist let alone
constitute penal offenses or premises for diagnostics, in other words fictive deeds can
never constitute penal offenses. In 2417/P/2014 I was a suspect of an aggravation
circumstance which is as much a penal offence as premeditation is, in other words a
crime with premeditation is a crime and premeditation is its aggravation circumstance,
while premeditation is not a crime, nor did I commit even an immoral deed to be
prosecuted. The Romanian “state” mafia invented 4 penal dossiers against me as cover-
up stories for the Crimes against humanity they committed against me to stop me from
denouncing their criminal activity, as I demonstrate thoroughly in my ICC penal
complaint and through annex 17 proving I was never indicted and convicted
European Court of Human Rights - Application form 9 / 13

Statement of alleged violation(s) of the Convention and/or Protocols and relevant arguments (continued)
60. Article invoked Explanation
Article 8 Tens of mafia soldiers meaning “masked police”, “police”, “secret police” and
gendarmes” committed state terrorism against me and my family through multiple
illegal home breaking and arrest on 17th September 2015, 11th December 2015 and
6th, 10th, 13th, 14th and 27th April 2017, which also constitute the felony of Property
violation. Noticeably the bulk of illegal home breaking and arrests are right before
Orthodox Easter 2017, through which the Romanian “state” mafia got my mother ill of
Zoster Area from stress and trauma threatening her too as they attempted to commit
Crimes against humanity against me on Orthodox Easter 2017 after falsifying their
“cover-up” story in 4909/231/2017. The Romanian “state” mafia separated me from my
mother for which I am the only family by forcing me to become a permanent refugee
fleeing out of fear of illegal indefinite to life imprisonment, Torture, Bodily Harm and
Qualified Murder as objectivized in annex 21, which constitute Crimes against humanity
Article 9 My right to free thought, conscience and religion exercise has been infringed upon by
the Romanian “state “mafia committing numerous acts of state terrorism and wrongful
political repression, and when the mafia failed to take away my freedom psychologically
through state terrorism, it committed Crimes against humanity against me by
repeatedly chemically lobotomizing me to stop me from denouncing its criminal activity
and right to live a life of consciousness, honor and honest work which the Romanian
“state” mafia destroyed first withholding my rights such as the state subvention for
relocation in interest of work for which I couldn’t buy a small one room apartment not
even through a special loan, couldn’t start a family and have been forced to give half of
my salary on rent which is throwing the money out the window, while the other half
went to food, utilities, toiletries etc., then the Romanian “state” mafia sold my work
litigation versus bribe from the Delhaize Group and destroyed my first career in
informatics through it, later destroying my second career in law through Crimes against
humanity. By committing state terrorism and attempting Crimes against humanity
against me during and before Orthodox Easter 2017, my right to free religious exercise
has also been infringed, as it was during the Crimes against humanity committed against
me during 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 - they disallowed me the comfort of
receiving a prayer book from my mother, calling the Christian orthodox religion “mystic
delirium” as they also declared the rule of law in fact by arresting me from my law
faculty sessions and exams, attempting and ultimately committing Crimes against
humanity against me for exercising my legal rights against the Romanian “state” mafia,
and for being a loyal citizen, believer in the order of right and human rights defender
Article 10 My right of free expression has been infringed upon by censorship on 8th April 2017
of militia.freeforums.net forum where I published over a hundred penal dossiers and
articles against the Romanian “state” mafia, primarily it’s corrupt and criminal body of
caporegime “magistrates”, mafia soldier “police”, “masked police”, “secret police” and
“gendarmes, and mafia associates “lawyers”, “legal medics”, “registrars”, interlopers,
felons, convicts etc., which is legal according to Romanian Law 544/2001 article 13
regarding the fact information regarding the criminal activity of public functionaries is
public information. On 10th April 2017 a partial censorship has been committed on my
facebook.com account, and the only other time my facebook.com account was
censored was right after I opened a group called “Romanian revolution for human
rights” in February 2018. If my exerted freedom of expression was illicit in any way, the
censorships would’ve been legal not covert or groundless
Article 13 All my judicial efforts were about obtaining justice, therefore as proven in 9 years of
human rights defending, there is no such thing as justice in Romania, EU and CoE / ECHR
Article 14 I've been discriminated on political grounds for being a human rights defender,
socially integrated rule of law loyal citizen as opposed to not being a mafia collaborator
Article 17 The Romanian “state” mafia “interprets” law and right declaratively falsifying stories
to serve as cover-up for the Crimes against humanity they perpetrated against me and
surely not only against me as I’ve proved and witnessed even its criminal activity being
a matter of national security in justice and health departments of state, as the mafia
chemically lobotomizes institutionalized children, homeless, the Rroma minority etc.

- Please ensure that the information you include here does not exceed the pages allotted -
European Court of Human Rights - Application form 10 / 13

G. Compliance with admissibility criteria laid down in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention


For each complaint, please confirm that you have used the available effective remedies in the country concerned, including appeals,
and also indicate the date when the final decision at domestic level was delivered and received, to show that you have complied with
the six-month time-limit.
61. Complaint Information about remedies used and the date of the final decision
on 2nd February 2018 it was The 6 months term foreseen by Article 35 of the Convention does not apply to Rule
falsified the decision in 39 urgent requests for interim measures according to Rule 47 paragraph 5.1 letter b,
12718/231/2017 in 2nd instance especially to my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures because I’m a
as anticipated, communicated on permanent refugee fleeing from the Romanian “state” mafia out of grounded fear of
20th February 2018, which I indefinite to life illegal incarceration (articles 3, 5), Torture (article 3), Bodily Harm
attached as annex 19. What I (article 3) and Qualified murder (article 2) which constitute Crimes against humanity, as
didn't anticipate is the mafia objectivized in annex 21 and in section I.A of my ICC penal complaint linked in section E,
being so desperate and being perpetually in danger of being captured and liquidated which perpetually
sentencing me for the crimes and motivates the actuality of this Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures, or
diagnosis of a person named until the Romanian murderous regime falls.
Vasilache Daniel, because I'm not This Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures is also about the fact the
indicted, convicted or diagnosed Romanian "state" mafia can protect in Romania any criminal it instigates to commit
as proven, and the mafia even Crimes against humanity against me, proved by the fact it already did and for this
invoked the falsified documents purpose the mafia can falsify any number and kind of documents, as proven by the
annulled anyway in falsified documents with which it attempted to cover-up its criminal activity, and the 4
14277/231/2015. My plead in penal dossiers it falsified against me to provide cover-up stories for the Crimes against
dossier 12718/231/2017 contains humanity it committed against me to stop me from denouncing its criminal activity, all
the invocation before the documents proven falsified by the fact I was never indicted and convicted in short, nor
Romanian "justice" of all the ever accused of the felonies of False declarations, Inducing the judiciary bodies in error
Convention articles it has broken, or Disseminating false information, and fully explicated in my ICC penal complaint
see annex 20. The full This request is the 7th by counting the number of times the previous have been
demonstration of the falsification illegally destroyed in various ways despite being the same as first proof, by mafia agents
of the decisions in posing as ECHR registrars, mentioning the 1st I lodged on 18th April 2017 was destroyed
12718/231/2017, the proposal, on 26th April 2017 meaning it could've prevented the Crimes against humanity from
the penal dossiers 2845/P/2016, 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 as well as me becoming a permanent refugee from
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 1st September 2017, mafia agents against which I opened a penal dossier I published
as well as the falsified decision in and keep updated at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/365438323/penal-
1779/91/2017 are to be found in complaint-against-D-Lupu-and-I-Banu-at-European-Court-of-Human-Rights
my ICC penal complaint work in
progress, linked in section E

- Please ensure that the information you include here does not exceed the page allotted -
European Court of Human Rights - Application form 11 / 13

62. Is or was there an appeal or remedy available to you which you have not used? Yes
● No
63. If you answered Yes above, please state which appeal or remedy you have not used and explain why not

H. Information concerning other international proceedings (if any)


64. Have you raised any of these complaints in another procedure of international investigation or Yes
settlement?
● No

65. If you answered Yes above, please give a concise summary of the procedure (complaints submitted, name of the international body
and date and nature of any decisions given).

66. Do you (the applicant) currently have, or have you previously had, any other applications before the ● Yes
Court? No
67. If you answered Yes above, please write the relevant application number(s) in the box below.
this Rule 39 EHCR urgent request for interim measures was illegally destroyed 6 times since I filed it the first time on 18th
April 2017 and was destroyed on 26th April 2017, which could've prevented the Crimes against humanity from between
27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, and could've prevented me becoming a permanent refugee since 1st September 2017.
Only been informed by the mafia agents posing as ECHR registrars of numbers 31061/17 and 56472/17
European Court of Human Rights - Application form 12 / 13

I. List of accompanying documents


You should enclose full and legible copies of all documents. No documents will be returned to you. It is thus in your interests to
submit copies, not originals. You MUST:
- arrange the documents in order by date and by procedure;
- number the pages consecutively; and
- NOT staple, bind or tape the documents.

68. In the box below, please list the documents in chronological order with a concise description. Indicate the page number at which
each document may be found.
the falsified documents regarding state terrorism through home breaking on 17th September 2015, based around
1. the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 p. 1
the falsified documents proving phone harassment, threatening and blackmail then consummation of these felonies
2. with the falsification of a "psychiatric" charlatanry incarceration proposal and indictment in 11224/231/2015 p. 18
the annulment as unfounded of the "psychiatric" charlatanry incarceration proposal and indictment in
3. 11224/231/2015 p. 33
after losing in 11224/231/2015 the "prosecutor" and his superior instigated the "psychiatrist" charlatans to falsify a
4. psychiatric "expertise" in my absence which is illegal according to article 10 of the Romanian Law 487/2002 p. 35
with the falsified psychiatric report the "prosecutor" filed a proposal that I be subjected to Crimes against humanity
5. as between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 in dossier 14277/231/2015, which was rejected as inadmissible p. 60

6. the falsified "prosecutor's" ordnance of renunciation of penal pursuit in the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 p. 65
another “prosecutor” falsified an appeal against the decision in 14277/231/2015, lacking active quality and more
7. importantly lacking any juridical logic as all the other schizophrenic "magistrates" in these cases p. 83
same "prosecutor" who falsified 14277/231/2015 appeal, in my dossiers regarding complaints about the first
8. "prosecutor's" falsified acts of procedure in 2417/P/2014, falsified the penal dossier 2845/P/2016 against me p. 89
the "judge" in "prosecutor's" falsified appeal 14277/231/2016, on 24th June 2016, harassed me for hours verbally to
9. provoke me then after failing falsified anyway the penal dossiers 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 against me p. 98
"prosecutor's appeal in 14277/231/2015 was rejected as unfounded, proving that the original "prosecutor's"
10. proposal and the "psychiatrist" charlatans "expertise" were falsified also. 4 judges changed in this file illegally p. 119
a falsified mandate was falsified in 4791/231/2017 for state terrorism through home breaking, by the same judge
11. who falsified one identically in 10547/231/2015 for 17th September 2015. Executed on 6th April 2017 p. 122
same "judge" in 4791/231/2017 falsified another mandate in 4909/231/2017 for bringing me in court at the last
12. moment and not be allowed to build a defense. He falsified the decision in 4909/231/2017, same day 10th April 2017 p. 124
first "judge" in my appeal against 4909/231/2017 demanded to "prove I'm not the devil" as in medieval witch hunts,
13. asking me to prove I'm mentally sane which I actually did although not required to prove my innocence and sanity p. 137
second "judge" in my appeal against 4909/231/2017 falsified the decision of rejection. Annex 20 representing my
14. plead in 12718/231/2017 also proves 4909/231/2017 in ne bis in idem with 11224/231/2015 was falsified p. 139
falsified decision in 1779/91/2017 representing my extraordinary attack against 4909/231/2017 in 2nd instance,
15. containing at 5th page the quote that I am: "free as long as hospitals and courthouses deem fit" for being innocent!? p. 149
falsified "psychiatric" incarceration discharge papers. Diagnosis #1 sais the right to file a penal complaint is acute
16. psychosis and diagnosis #2 sais I’m imagining I’m under penal pursuit in the falsified penal dossiers. No motivation p. 164
my penal history certificate from 6th July 2017 proving I'm innocent meaning all penal dossiers against me are
17. totalitarian wrongful political repression and state terrorism. Annex 18-19 prove I am innocent beyond 6th July 2017 p. 185
a falsified "prosecutor's" ordinance for closing the last 3 falsified penal dossiers against me, with the falsified
18. proposal that I be subjected to Crimes against humanity as between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 p. 187
the falsified decision in 12718/231/2017 that I be subjected to Crimes against humanity for the crimes and diagnosis
19. of a person named Vasilache Daniel because I was never indicted, convicted or diagnosed p. 204
my plead in 12718/231/2017 proving the proposal and consequent decision are falsified, as the proposal in
20. 14277/231/2015 was from where I adapted the plead because of ne bis in idem relation with 12718/231/2017 p. 221

21. demonstration of my grounds of fearing indefinite to life incarceration, Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualified Murder p. 324
proofs that I'm a student of law faculty in first year, that I'm army incorporable and psychologically apt of superior
22. studies, and that I paid and graduated the first year, money lost and second career destroyed by the mafia p. 376
explanatory notes, no page limit according to Rule 47.5.1.b, containing summary demonstration of the illegality of all
23. psychiatric actions, explication of urgency of request, damage claims, background, proposals for interim measures p. 380

24. copy of my mother's full judiciary powers mandate I given her through the notary p. 404

25. empty placeholder p.


European Court of Human Rights - Application form 13 / 13

Any other comments


Do you have any other comments about your application?

69. Comments
the previous Rule 39 ECHR urgent requests for interim measures are obsolete meaning this one contains all the others and
is the only one up to date and best representing the actual situation

Declaration and signature


I hereby declare that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information I have given in the present application form is correct.

70. Date
0 8 0 8 2 0 1 8 e.g. 27/09/2015
D D M M Y Y Y Y

The applicant(s) or the applicant’s representative(s) must sign in the box below.
71. Signature(s) Applicant(s) ● Representative(s) - tick as appropriate

Confirmation of correspondent
If there is more than one applicant or more than one representative, please give the name and address of the one person with whom
the Court will correspond. Where the applicant is represented, the Court will correspond only with the representative (lawyer or non-
lawyer).
72. Name and address of ● Applicant Representative - tick as appropriate

The completed application form should be


signed and sent by post to:
The Registrar
European Court of Human Rights
Council of Europe
67075 STRASBOURG CEDEX
FRANCE

893669e1-66ca-4653-b9e0-2de2561a694b
ANNEX 1 / ECHR Page 1 of 403

Annex 1 inventory, summary demonstration of falsification, indicates full demonstration,

1. 1 page, falsified mandate from 10th September 2015 from 10547/231/2015


2. 2 pages, falsified ordnance from 11th September 2015 based on 10547/231/2015
3. 1 page, falsified mandate from 17th September 2015 from 2417/P/2014
4. 2 page, falsified “psychiatry” charlatanry incarceration documents
5. 2 page, falsified ordnance proposal for an impossible “psychiatric expertise” without my consent

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, particularly section I.B.20 and preliminary section 20

Summary demonstration of the falsification of these documents is as follows:


All juridical acts under the rule of law are only valid if they are a syllogistical inference from a
particular factual premise correlated with an universal law premise. Because all these documents lack
either the factual premise or is falsified, or break the law premise, they are all falsified. In penal matters
the judge must motivate in fact and by right according to article 403 paragraph 1 letters c and d, and the
prosecutor according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code

1. The decision in dossier 10547/231/2015 is falsified because


1.1. According to the text of article 265 paragraph 1 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code a
mandate can be issued:
1.1.1. If without justification I didn’t come when summoned with a subpoena. Because I was
never legally subpoenaed, logically I couldn’t come when summoned because I was not. Because I was
never audited in 2417/P/2014, logically my audit wasn’t deemed necessary but just my presence for the
purpose of state terrorism and wrongful political repression to be committed against me. In fact
“prosecutor” Mihaila Paul falsified a subpoena missing a lot of important information according to
article258 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, for the morning of 5th May 2015, but
communicated it to me in the afternoon of 5th May 2015, then refused to make a legal subpoena after I
emailed him a memo on 9th May 2015. In fact “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul lied that I refused to give a
declaration on 17th September 2015 when in fact I demonstrated his felonies which he of course refused
to note in his falsified dossier 2417/P/2014, forcing me to send the declaration through email in
2417/P/2014.
1.1.2. If a subpoena couldn’t be communicated or the subpoenaed person evades the summons.
Since the “judiciary bodies” knew my email address from my memo from 9th May 2015 and other
petitions I made by email, my mother’s address and phone as proven by annex 1 and annex 2, it can’t be
retained I couldn’t be subpoenaed, and as proof no legal subpoena has been attempted in 2417/P/2014
1.2. According to the text of article 265 paragraph 2 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code a
mandate can be issued before summons, if the measure is imposed by the interest of solving the cause,
but because the measure is not imposed by the interest of solving the cause proven by
ANNEX 1 / ECHR Page 2 of 403

1.2.1. The fact no legal acts of procedure were effectuated on 17th September 2015 to at least
motivate factually the interest of solving the cause, although it is obligatory according to article 265
paragraph 11 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1.2.2. the lacking motivation in fact and by right according to article 265 paragraph 5 letter a and
article 286 paragraph 2 letter d, leading to nullity of the “prosecutor’s” request of a mandate and all
subsequent acts such as the falsified decision in 10547/231/2015 according to articles 280-282 from the
Romanian Penal Procedure code, corroborated with the fact the “judge” also didn’t motivate in fact and
by right according to article 265 paragraph 7, paragraph 8 letter f and paragraph 10, and article 403
paragraph 1 letters c and d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1.3. According to the text of article 184 paragraph 1 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code,
the disposal of a “psychiatric” charlatanry “examination” meaning not coercion but proposal
according to article 184 paragraph 3 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code and article 11 from the
Romanian Law 487/2002 regarding the inquiry for consent as coercion attracts the vice of consent or
lack of consent and invalidation of any proof obtained illegally or under Torture according to articles 102
(paragraphs 1 and 2) and 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, proofs which are required
for “legal” (ad absurdum) obligation to “psychiatric” incarceration and chemical lobotomization
according to article 184 paragraph 7, 245-248 and 566-572 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code ,
proposal that can only be made to minors between 14 and 16 years old or women who harmed or
killed their baby whenever the prosecutor hallucinates - any ideation without evidence is a symptom of
schizophrenia or failure to recognize what’s real, that there’s a doubt regarding the discernment of the
suspect or accused in the moment of the felony committal - expression which proves the “prosecutor”
who wrote this article is schizophrenic also since suspects and accused by definition committed no
felony, they are legally and logically innocent - article 184 paragraph 1 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code is unconstitutional and illegal at the same time because according to article 4 paragraph
2 from the Romanian Penal Procedure, any prosecutor’s doubt, in my particular case a proven
“prosecutor’s” schizophrenic hallucination, can only be interpreted in favor of the suspect or the
accused who dispose of what’s in their favor according to the principle of disposition, respectively it
cannot be proposed to the suspect or the accused according to the presumption of innocence except if
the suspect or accused admit they committed the felony case in which they still must be prosecuted,
indicted and convicted as required by the law because it’s been known persons with mental problems
admitted that they committed felonies which they didn’t respectively there’s a small chance of a person
being drugged (e.g. with scopolamine or “the devil’s breath” according to <insert link to article here>) or
otherwise coerced to admit to have committed a felony, presumption of innocence which according to
article 23 paragraph 11 form the Romanian Constitution can only be removed through a definitive
conviction by an impartial tribunal which respected all the rights of the accused as the suspect cannot be
indicted and convicted, and proved the accused guilt beyond all reasonable doubt, as corroborated with
articles 11 and 20 from the Romanian Constitution, article 6 paragraph 2 from ECHR and article 11 from
UDHR. Because I was falsely suspected of an aggravation circumstance and not a felony in 2417/P/2014
because the “prosecutor” is schizophrenic as proven by his symptoms of logical incoherence,
occupational dysfunction and failure to recognize what’s real according to DSM-V manual of diagnosis
and statistics, and clearly I haven’t been accused of killing my baby not being a woman to have a baby to
ANNEX 1 / ECHR Page 3 of 403

start with, nor am I a minor evidently not a felon, therefore the “psychiatric” charlatanry “examination”
procedure is not applicable to me

2. The ordnance from 11th September 2015 based on 10547/231/2015 is falsified because:
2.1. Nullity of a juridical act logically attracts the nullity of all subsequent juridical acts therefore
because 10547/231/2015 is null, the ordnance from 11th September 2015 is null
2.2. Furthermore I clarify that the following lies are irrelevant to these falsified documents as
they don’t constitute the motivation required, with the exception that they are an obvious cover-up
story that actually reveals dossier 2417/P/2014 is falsified and therefore all the acts of procedure
derived from it are null, meaning the mafia “masked police” and “police” soldiers knew they were
executing falsified mandates:
2.2.1. the “prosecutor” lies that 2417/P/2014 object regards a felony. Judiciary outrage is not a
felony but an aggravation circumstance for other felonies of which I was never accused of
2.2.2. the “prosecutor” lies 2417/P/2014 is to be solved with celerity which imposes the
execution of a falsified mandate as state terrorism home breaking, illegal detention and harassment
which are felonies not acts of procedure, as obviously proven by the fact 9 months passed idly by since
the lodging of the falsified penal complaint on 11th December 2014 that was registered as 2417/P/2014.
The “prosecutor” hid this penal dossier while the “judge” who falsified the penal complaint lodged and
lost action 15730/231/2014 against me which is the 2nd Crimes against humanity attempt against me
2.2.3. the “prosecutor” lies that the mandate was falsified for my audience and the effectuation
of other acts of procedure. No act of procedure was effectuated on 17th September 2015 when I was
detained for 7 hours contrary to article 265 paragraph 12 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
2.2.4. the “prosecutor” lies that “judge” Dita Mirela had to solve multiple civil dossiers. In reality
“judge” Dita Mirela stole ~12 (twelve) civil dossiers from the random distribution system of dossiers to
falsify the decisions of rejection. The proof is mathematical - that because there are 6 civil judges to
which a civil dossier can be randomly distributed, each dossier has 1/6 chances of being distributed to
“judge” Dita Mirela, however because ~12 civil dossiers were supposedly randomly distributed
consecutively the chance is (1/6)^12 which is 0.00000000046, or 1 in 2,176,782,336, or 1 chance in 2
billion, while the chance to win the 6/49 lottery is 1 in 14 million to get the idea that it’s preposterous to
think “judge” Dita Mirela obtain randomly ~12 civil dossiers in a row, meaning “judge” Dita Mirela”
shamelessly stole ~12 civil dossiers to falsify the decisions for the Romanian “state” mafia, and
interloper Herghelegiu Danut “judge” Dita Mirela instigated to commit the Qualified Murder attempts
against me on 27th October 2014 and the night of 5th to 6th December 2014 against me, proven by the
fact “judge” Dita Mirela willingly and personally intervened to protect interloper Herghelegiu Danut
after he committed the 1st Qualified Murder attempt, then personally instigated other members of the
Romanian “state” mafia against me after the 2nd Qualified Murder attempt, namely the “prosecutor” in
2417/P/2014 in cahoots which desperately attempted to cover-up the Crimes against humanity
committed against me in the night between 5th to 6th December 2014, through 5 more Crimes against
humanity attempts and the committal of Crimes against humanity between 27th May 2017 and 8th June
2017, as I’ve objectivized in section A of my ICC penal complaint. The real reason for the order to
liquidate me is not that I attacked judicially the Romanian “state” mafia in the degenerated “European”
Vrancea county where the “police” mafia soldiers are entertaining themselves having orgies with minors
ANNEX 1 / ECHR Page 4 of 403

at the police section under the protective wing of the Romanian “state” mafia of course according to the
press meaning notoriously known, but that I attacked judicially right before the Qualified Murder
attempts started, two of the Romanian “state” mafia leadership, meaning every disciplinary action
titularies at the time according to article 44 from Romanian Law 317/2004, from which I name the most
notorious criminal namely Livia Stanciu who’s falsified sentences have been repeatedly annulled at ECHR
as further proof.
2.2.5. the “prosecutor” lied that the ~12 civil dossiers which “judge” Dita Mirela stole to falsify
the decisions were annulled, and that I was fined. In reality after “judge” Dita Mirela falsified the
decision in each civil dossier stolen declaring they are all irregular meaning “judge” Dita Mirela lied they
are not signed etc., “judge” Dita Mirela contrary to the law at the same time entered judgment and
falsified fines against me in each stolen civil dossier, declaring each one unfounded without proving how
because “judge” Dita Mirela can’t, because nobody can justify breaking the law, but a judge is always
obligated to motivate a decision in fact and by right. The whole Romanian “state” mafia is in cahoots
with “judge” Dita Mirela on this because I’ve notified the Superior Council of Magistrates for disciplinary
layoff of “judge” Dita Mirela, as well as the other disciplinary action titularies meaning the supreme
court president Livia Stanciu, the minister of justice etc., and they all covered for “judge” Dita Mirela
2.2.6. the “prosecutor” lied that I addressed ~“threatening and insulting words for the purpose
of intimidation or revenge for the way “judge” Dita Mirela did her job” as proven by the fact suing and
lodging penal complaints against “judge” Dita Mirela makes “judge” Dita Mirela a defendant and
accused not a judge, evidently because according to the principle of right nemo esse iudex in sua causa
potest - nobody can be a judge in his own case although the Romanian “state” mafia “magistrates” do
2.2.7. the “prosecutor” lies that through the ordnance from 30th January 2015 it was disposed
the beginning of the penal pursuit, or in rem penal pursuit where the prosecutor establishes the
existence of a felony, because in reality that ordnance is obviously falsified, as I prove by the fact I’ve
invoked in paragraph 2.2.6 that “judge” Dita Mirela when sued or in penal complaint against him, is not
a judge but a defendant respectively accused, therefore I cannot be accused for the aggravation
circumstance of Judiciary outrage which refers to an increase in punishment for felonies committed
against a judge of which I wasn’t even accused of, as is further obvious the quality of delinquent and
felon respectively are incompatible with the quality of a magistrate and if “judge” Dita Mirela feels
threatened and insulted that I proved he is a delinquent and a felon, that is my right not a felony nor
psychosis like the Romanian “state” mafia tried to discredit me with as a cover-up story for the Crimes
against humanity it committed against me, and finally I have not uttered threatening or insulting words
but told the truth using a judicial technique called the proof of verity of which a mafia member wouldn’t
know about because the troglodyte criminal peasants that form any mafia in the world do not
preoccupy themselves with the law
2.2.8. the “prosecutor” lies that through the ordnance from 25th June 2015 it was disposed the
continuation of penal pursuit, or in personam penal pursuit where the prosecutor establishes the
suspects of committing the felony, because in reality that ordnance is obviously falsified without even
being communicated to me, as I prove by the fact that nobody can be suspect or accused of a felony
that doesn’t exist, reminding that Judiciary outrage as I’ve corroborated through a specialty article of a
councilor of the general prosecutor’s office in Romania, is not a felony but an aggravation of a felony
that in 2417/P/2014 I was not accused of because it doesn’t exist, therefore I can’t be a suspect
ANNEX 1 / ECHR Page 5 of 403

3. the mandate from 17th September 2015 from 2417/P/2014 is falsified because:
3.1. see 1.3.
3.2. a “psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise” can’t be effectuated without the informed consent of
a person according to article 184 paragraph 3 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code and articles 11
and 12 from the Romanian Law 487/2002. Frankly, any person who gives his consent to be “expertized”
by a “psychiatrist” charlatan is mentally alienated from the reality that “psychiatry” is charlatanry,
neither medicine nor science, as I’ve objectivized in section I.A.II.1.2.1 of my ICC penal complaint. I
didn’t consent
3.3. is unmotivated in fact and by right according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter d, and
inherently its juridical syllogism is invalid, being an inference without premises or false premises
3.4. it breaks the law namely article 265 paragraph 1, paragraph 2 (see paragraph 1.2 explication
of this document), 5 letter a, 8 letter f, 10 and 12 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
3.5. it breaks the law namely article 184 paragraph 4 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
regarding the fact only after a suspect or accused of homicide has given its consent to be subject to a
“psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise”, and only after that suspect or accused of homicide refuses or fails
to present himself at an “expertise” after giving his consent, only then the proposal of a mandate be
emitted for the suspect or accused of homicide to be brought by force in front of the “psychiatrist”
committee of charlatans, mandate which is only valid if it’s emitted by the judge of rights and liberties
and not a prosecutor, and only if it respects the law needless to mention, otherwise is null according to
articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, and so are all other juridical acts derived
from it
3.6. as demonstrated at chapter 2, the lies told within are irrelevant with one exception

4. the “psychiatry” charlatanry incarceration documents are falsified because:


4.1. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie an “expertise” took place as obviously proven it was
impossible without my consent and cooperation, according to article 184 paragraph 3 from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code, and articles 11 and 12 from the Romanian Law 487/2002
4.2. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie that there exists “the complexity of the case” because there
is no case proven or falsified even before 23rd November 2015 and inherently there is no complexity that
could be observed because no “expertise” took place, and the ”psychiatrist” charlatans do not
objectivize their lie because it’s impossible, which they must according to article 184 paragraph 7 from
the Romanian Penal Procedure Code regarding amongst other the objectivization of the necessity of
“psychiatric” charlatanry incarceration and the proportionality with the purpose pursued
4.3. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie recommending my “psychiatric” charlatanry incarceration
for “examination” because no “examination” can take place without my consent and cooperation
according to article 184 paragraph 3 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code and Romanian Law
487/2002 articles 11 and 12.
4.4. the “psychiatrist” charlatans broke the law proposing that I be “psychiatrically”
incarcerated, because according to articles 184 paragraphs 1, 3 and 5 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code, only after a suspect or accused of homicide has given its consent to be subject to the
“psychiatric” charlatanry fakery, and only after that suspect or accused of homicide refuses to be
ANNEX 1 / ECHR Page 6 of 403

incarcerated despite giving his consent to be “expertized” by a “psychiatrist” charlatan as otherwise no


“expertize” can take place, and only after the “psychiatrist” committee of charlatans objectivize the
necessity of “psychiatric” incarceration for a “complex expertise” according to article 184 paragraph 7
from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, can a proposal for a mandate be emitted that the suspect or
accused of homicide be “psychiatrically” incarcerated by force in one of Romania’s “psychiatric” gulags. I
was never a suspect or accused of homicide nor was I ever stupid enough to consent to “psychiatrist”
charlatan’s fakery except perhaps in the army incorporation procedures where I was declared mentally
sane as proven by annex 22 and as retained by my family doctor.
4.5. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie recommending my “psychiatric” charlatanry incarceration
without any motivation which invalidates their juridical act from the start, according to articles 1, 4 and
5 from annex 2 of the Romanian Medical Deontology Code, regarding particularities of the activity of the
legal medic, articles 1, 5, 8, 22 letter f and 40 from the Romanian Medical Deontology Code and article 3
from the Romanian methodological norms regarding the activity of the legal medic in quality of expert
named by the judiciary bodies, all regarding in general that a legal medic must objectivize all his juridical
acts scientifically, respect the legal medicine methodology and deontological norms, be diligent, never
falsify documents for complaisance or illicit profit (as if falsifying documents need a reason to constitute
a felony) and strict respect of conditions foreseen by the law and professional norms. As I’ve
objectivized in section A of my ICC penal complaint there is no such thing as “psychiatry” discipline, it’s
charlatanry not medicine nor science as I’ve objectivized in section I.A.II.1.2.1 of my ICC penal complaint,
and consequently there is no such thing as a “psychiatric hospital” or “psychiatric medicine”, but in fact
there is a prison in Focsani with bars and abusive guards that I appropriately call a gulag, where persons
without defense against these “psychiatrist” charlatans and torturers, such as uneducated persons -
peasants, youngsters, elders, gypsies, or, human rights defenders placed outside the protection of the
law by the Romanian “state” mafia like myself, are subjected to illegal experiments which these
“psychiatrist” torturers admitted in the press claiming aberrantly the Health Ministry authorized them,
daily physical and constant psychological abuse as I’ve witnessed personally, execrable hygienic
conditions as overcrowding such as 8 or more persons in a room, sleeping two at a time on old
operating tables as there is no such thing as a bed, with unwashed street people gathered by the
“psychiatrist” torturers to fill the gulag and justify their charlatanry which in fact the Romanian Secret
Services reported already to the general prosecutor’s office who covered up this too after I denounced
publicly that Romanian “justice” drugs innocents, the toilets have no lids, there’s no toilet paper and
feces and urine are all over the floor and toilet, while the showers are broken and they make the
inmates stand in line while ”psychiatrist” torturers give them water with a spoon to superficially wash
their armpits - I haven’t seen or even heard something so pathetic as in Romanian there’s no such thing
as water shortages, and the funds aren’t missing because of economy but because they are stolen as for
example the “psychiatrist” charlatans in the degenerated “European” Vrancea county are the largest
category of fake medics in the local hospital by far as this mafia operation simply got out of hand, and
99% of the inmates didn’t require any kind of medical attention or being incarcerated at all between 27th
May 2017 and 8th June 2017 while Crimes against humanity have been perpetrated against me. In the
Focsani “psychiatric” gulag there’s nothing to do than live in terror of constant abuse by the guards and
daily forced neurotoxic poisoning without any logic than to justify the charlatanry of these “psychiatrist”
torturers who never cured nobody of nothing but killed plenty or drove to suicide or homicide even, as
ANNEX 1 / ECHR Page 7 of 403

I’ve also objectivized in section A of my ICC penal complaint, reason for which they should be all
executed using the electric chair as in the U.S. as appropriate punishment, because as I proven the
eradication of a person’s identity through chemical lobotomy is capital punishment or qualified
murder in this case. To the “psychiatrist” criminal psychopaths in the Focsani “psychiatric” gulag anyone
who is an inmate is automatically stigmatized as being “mentally ill” and everyone is poisoned daily
without logic and without any scientific objectivization because none can exist given “psychiatry” is
neither medicine nor science, is charlatanry often used as state terrorism and wrongful political
repression, as I’ve also proven in section A of my ICC penal complaint there’s no such thing as mental
illnesses, it’s a metaphoric expression, and some “psychiatrist” charlatans even admit it publicly
4.6. According to article 54 from the Romanian Law 487/2002, because it’s impossible, no
“psychiatrist” charlatan ever objectivized I suffer from a psychic disorder and lack discernment to
circumvent article 11 from the Romanian Law 487/2002 and “psychiatrically” incarcerate me - they lied
as proven in annex 4 summary where they even admitted they hadn’t had my consent therefore
admitted they lied I lack discernment from the start because they haven’t declared from the start I lack
discernment as they should’ve to circumvent my not given consent, case in which the mafia should’ve
closed a contract with a legal or conventional representant which doesn’t exist, conventional
representant which would’ve been my mother who would’ve refused my chemical lobotomy of course
according to articles 29-30, 45 and others from the Romanian Law 487/2002 about which mafia knew
and broke the law attempting to cover-up the illegality naming as “curator” the “psychiatrist” charlatan
torturer Barbarosie Carmen without any legal forms to commit Crimes against humanity against me
between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 , without convening the “psychiatric” charlatanry ethics
committee according to article 43 from the Romanian Law 487/2002 who legally predictable would’ve
denied my chemical lobotomization or amputation of parts of my brain through deadly fluorine
neurotoxic poisoning, which is why no such committee was even attempted to be convened because it’s
impossible to successfully cover-up chemical lobotomization being proven psychologically sane and
physiologically healthy at the same time, refusing to communicate or hiding all falsified “psychiatric”
charlatanry documents except the falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry incarceration discharge papers from
8th June 2017 attached as annex 16 as the mafia refused to communicate to me any law, regulations and
other informations regarding chemical lobotomization with the exception of the aforementioned
exception, and furthermore the mafia should’ve proven the danger to myself or others which it couldn’t
because it’s impossible, it just lied without proofs I’m irresponsible, lacking discernment and being
violent, in short breaking every relevant law and regulation there is and achieving nothing but
amputating my ability to enjoy life which evidently didn’t result in suicide or homicide as I proven the
“psychiatry” charlatanry poisons induce in section I.A.II.1.2.10^1 of my ICC penal complaint because I am
above sane and healthy, I’m a rational being able to self correct any drug induced anomalies as I’ve
defeated by God’s grace the suicidal ideation induced through the covert injected poisoning with the
same deadly fluorine based neurotoxin in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014 with which I’ve
been drugged between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 as objectivized in section A.II.1.3.1^7 and A.I.1-
2 from my ICC penal complaint, which proves instead the obsessive instigation and committal of Crimes
against humanity against me with malice aforethought, which proves others are suffering because of
the “psychiatric” charlatans criminal antisocial personality disorder and schizophrenia
ANNEX 1 / ECHR Page 8 of 403

4.7. According to articles 32, 33 paragraph 5, 58 and 61 paragraph 5 from the Romanian Law
487/2002, article 28 paragraph 2 from the norms of application of the Romanian Law 487/2002, these
“psychiatric” charlatanry documents should’ve been communicated to me immediately, which they
weren’t reason for which in consequence they are null according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian
Penal Procedure Code, the reason the mafia didn’t communicate them to me being that of obstructing
my right to defend myself

5. The ordnance proposal for an impossible “psychiatric expertise” without my consent is


falsified because
5.1. the ”prosecutor” being schizophrenic meaning logically incoherent and occupationally
dysfunctional according to DSM-V manual of statistics and diagnosis, proposed that “it shall be
established if he (a suspect) committed the crime “retained as his task” (schizophrenic speech) without
discernment”, breaking the meaning of the quality of suspect which is an innocent person until proven
guilty according to the presumption of innocence which can only be removed through a definitive
conviction following an indictment of a person
5.2. the mafia ”prosecutor” being schizophrenic meaning logically incoherent and occupationally
dysfunctional according to DSM-V manual of statistics and diagnosis, declared that me and intrinsically
anyone who exercises his rights for the re-establishment of the order of right gives proof of mental
alienation (not succumbing to the fear imposed by the reality that the mafia controls the Romanian
“state” and not the rule of law, which the mafia “prosecutor” would be right except I was fully aware of
that already at the time, and the “prosecutor” was fully aware from my demonstrations of the mafia’s
criminal activity that I was fully aware therefore there is no question not even in this ad absurdum
demonstration that I do not have full discernment about what I was doing, and as proof I’m still alive
and still fighting this impotent mafia of troglodytes), and these “proofs” are suing and lodging penal
complaints against the proven felon “judge” Dita Mirela, and that these petitions are numerous
according to the crimes of “judge” Dita Mirela, also lying that suing “judge” Dita Mirela blocks the
activity of the instance which is a ludicrous declarations as expected from a schizophrenic, declaration
in actuality coming from schizophrenic “judge” Dita Mirela who instigated “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul to
copy-paste it without discernment as from one schizophrenic to another, and lodging a penal complaint
for the 1st Qualified Murder attempt from 27th October 2014 against interloper Herghelegiu Danut and
the mafia soldier “policeman” and “gendarme” who accompanied to help him, clearly instigated by the
Romanian “state” mafia as no apparently civilian interloper has command over the mafia soldier
“policemen” and “gendarmes”. All this is irrelevant in actuality because according to article 4 paragraph
2 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code regarding the presumption of innocence, all prosecutor
doubts are to be interpreted solely in the favor of the suspect or the accused, therefore if the suspect or
accused of homicide do not admit at least to have committed the crime, pleading insanity and giving his
consent to be “examined” by a “psychiatrist” charlatan or committee of charlatans, no such procedure
can take place, meaning it is the suspect or accused who decide what’s in their favor, gambling for a
decision of acquittal or pleading insanity admitting the homicide - as corroborated by the fact it’s not
the prosecutor or the “psychiatrist” charlatan’s legal capacity to decide if someone committed a crime
or not, that is solely the instance’s prerogative, not even any one judge’s prerogative as a definitive
conviction is required to remove the presumption of innocence, and even then the decision can be
ANNEX 1 / ECHR Page 9 of 403

attacked if not proven, the “judge” falsified it or was misled by falsified proof by the “prosecutor”, false
witnesses and so on and so forth. The Romanian “state” mafias “judiciary bodies” have no idea of all of
this because the law is clearly not their preoccupation but committing crimes
5.2. see paragraph 1.3, 3.2 and 3.5
5.3. as demonstrated at point 2, the lies told within are irrelevant with one exception. Also see
see paragraph 2.6 from annex 2 summary

In conclusion the documents contained in this annex are all falsified constituting acts of state
terrorism through illegal home breaking, detainment and harassment, as proven by the fact despite no
legal act of procedure was effectuated I was detained for 7 hours contrary to article 265 paragraph 12
from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code that imposes my immediate release, acts which later have
been used as instigation and implicitly complicity to wrongful political repression through the
perpetration of Crimes against humanity as the Romanian “state” mafia incrementally assured itself
public opinion is dead in Romania and nobody would be outrages as nobody was for the fact I was
illegally deprived of liberty, Tortured, Bodily Harmed and that Qualified Murder has been attempted
against me continuously between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 by being put in anaphylactic shock
for at least 3 days through deadly fluorine and chlorine injections without treatment, then after I
survived forced to take other deadly fluorine and chlorine deadly neurotoxins as objectivized in annex
21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal complaint. These documents are also null because all the
falsified acts of procedure in the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 are null for being started off from a
falsified dossier as I’ve proven in chapter 2, according to articled 280-282 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code
ANNEX 1 / ECHR Page 10 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 1 / ECHR Page 11 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 1 / ECHR Page 12 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 1 / ECHR Page 13 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 1 / ECHR Page 14 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 1 / ECHR Page 15 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 1 / ECHR Page 16 of 403
ANNEX 1 / ECHR Page 17 of 403
ANNEX 2 / ECHR Page 18 of 403

Annex 2 inventory, summary demonstration of falsification, indicates full demonstration,

1. 1 page, falsified report of falsified summons from 22nd September 2015 from 2417/P/2014
2. 3 pages, falsified proposal that Crimes against humanity be committed against me as between
27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 based on the identical dossier 4909/231/2017
3. 1 page, minute representing the falsified decision in 11224/231/2015
4. 1 page, falsified mandate by the “judge” who falsified the decision in 11224/231/2015 in 1st
instance, reason for which he was incompatible to judge according to article 64 paragraph 1
letter f from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, particularly section I.B.20 and preliminary section 20

Summary demonstration of the falsification of these documents is as follows:


All juridical acts under the rule of law are only valid if they are a syllogistical inference from a
particular factual premise correlated with an universal law premise. Because all these documents lack
either the factual premise or is falsified, or break the law premise, they are all falsified. In penal matters
the judge must motivate in fact and by right according to article 403 paragraph 1 letters c and d, and the
prosecutor according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code

1. The report of falsified summons from 22nd September 2015 from 2417/P/2014 is falsified
because
1.1. The suspect or the accused are to be subpoenaed at the address where they live, according
to article 259 paragraph 1 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code. Because the “prosecutor” falsified
a subpoena and communicated it on my mother’s address on 5th May 2015 after the time at which I was
summoned, and because I sent the “prosecutor” a memo by email on 9th May 2015 indicating in
consequence the email at which I can be summoned and implicitly that I can be subpoenaed at my
mother’s address where the tardy subpoena was sent and to which I responded through the memo, and
because the “prosecutor” lied that I live without legal evidence at my mother’s address, and because the
“prosecutor” illegally arrested me on 17th September 2015 at 6 a.m. and harassed me for 7 hours
without effectuating any act of procedure as is legally obligatory, the “prosecutor” knew he could’ve
subpoenaed me either by email or at my mother’s address and was obligated to do so by his own lie and
falsified acts of procedure that I live without legal evidence at my mother’s address, but refused because
he intended and perpetrated the felonies of Harassment, Threatening and Blackmail through the
telephone against my mother under the pretext of subpoenaing, knowing he cannot legally
“psychiatrically” incarcerate me so in his criminal sociopathic mind he thought my mother was
psychologically labile as his other victims and succumb to Harassment, Threatening and Blackmail. I
mention there is no such thing as a telephone subpoena to relatives in the law who mentions only a
telephonic note, meaning an SMS which can constitute proof of legal summons, to the subpoenaed
person, with the exception of summoned minors who can only be subpoenaed through their parents or
tutor which is not my case evidently at 34 years old at the time, according to article 257 paragraph 1
ANNEX 2 / ECHR Page 19 of 403

from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, in conclusion the telephonic Blackmail being intentional
because it leaves no proof of the conversation had other than that in the hands of the Romanian “state”
mafia’s “secret information services” if the conversation was clandestinely recorded as it usually is in
Romania as a control instrument through perpetual Blackmail against the mafia “magistrates”
themselves. According to article 257 paragraph 5 and article 259 paragraph 13 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code, the citation through email is done at the address indicated by the summoned person,
which I did indicate through the memo from 9th May 2015. Ad absurdum, if the citation place for the
suspect or accused is not known, at the address of the judiciary body it will be displayed a notification,
which to my knowledge it has not been displayed as proven also by the fact no such mention was made
anywhere in the falsified dossier 2417/P/2014, according to article 259 paragraph 5 from the Romanian
Penal Procedure Code. In conclusion the acts of summons itself is falsified to mask telephonic
Harassment, Threatening and Blackmail, which is null according to article 280-282 from the Romanian
Penal Procedure Code, and so are all acts derived from it, such as the falsified report
1.2. the “prosecutor” lies that I am prosecuted for the committal of the felony of Judiciary
outrage, because no physical deed that can constitute a felony exist in 2417/P/2014, and because
Judiciary outrage is not a felony but the aggravation circumstance for other felonies of which I have not
been suspected of even, because the “prosecutor” is schizophrenic that is logically incoherent and
occupationally dysfunctional, according to DSM-V manual of statistics and diagnosis
1.3. the “prosecutor” lies that he subpoenaed me through the telephone, admitting at the same
time he spoke with my mother, then he harassed my mother again under the pretext of subpoenaing
me, proving again he is schizophrenic through logical incoherence and occupational dysfunction. See
paragraph 1.1
1.4. the “prosecutor” lies that he told my mother “is necessary” to communicate to me the
voluntary “psychiatric” incarceration falsified documents I’ve proven falsified in annex 1, as proven by
the fact he did not need to Blackmail my mother telephonically because the law provides the
communication of acts of procedure through post or email, which the “prosecutor never even
attempted although he had all the means as proven in paragraph 1.1, according to article 264 from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1.5. the “prosecutor” lies intrinsically that “lawyer” Dodoiu Corina or my mother Raneti Mariana
represent me in any way in 2417/P/2014, being no reason to harass either of them telephonically, as he
admits he did through 4 calls in the otherwise falsified report in which he doesn’t mention his felonies
but proves them in contrast with the law nevertheless being schizophrenic and not making the
connection with this reality
1.6. see paragraph 1.3, 3.2 and 3.5 from annex 1 summary, which attracts the nullity of all
subsequent acts

2. the proposal that Crimes against humanity be committed against me as between 27th May
2017 and 8th June 2017 based on the identical dossier 4909/231/2017, is falsified because:
2.1. see paragraph 1.2., which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
2.2. see chapter 2 from annex 1 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
2.3. based on the instigation of “judge” Dita Mirela alone in 2417/P/2014 that Crimes against
humanity be committed against me as in the night between 5th to 6th December 2014 proven in sections
ANNEX 2 / ECHR Page 20 of 403

A.II.1.3.1^7 and A.I.1-2 from my ICC penal complaint, and as between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017
as instigated again by same “judge” Dita Mirela, the “prosecutor” lied without any motivation in fact and
by right that is breaking the law, I “must be obligated to an (impossible without my consent) legal
medicine psychiatric expertise, to establish if I have discernment”, being as obvious this is an instigation
to Crimes against humanity be committed against me as is obvious to everybody I have discernment,
especially obvious to the Romanian “state” mafia who recognized it’s criminal activity in all my penal
and public denouncements and became overly paranoid I will single handedly overthrow its totalitarian
regime, that is actually it believed I would raise public opinion and overthrow the mafia as proven by the
motivation in 11224/231/2015 in which “judge” Craciun Constantin Catalin declared unrelated with the
object of the action that ~“I must be “psychiatrically” incarcerated so as others don’t take example”
meaning in other words I’m a Romanian “state” mafia certified anti-mafia leader. Furthermore against
“judge” Dita Mirela for committing the felonies of False declarations and Inducing the judiciary bodies
into “error” in 2417/P/2014, I opened yet another penal dossier in which “judge” Dita Mirela was never
acquitted as in all the others as proof, but the Romanian “state” mafia to cover-up the crimes of “judge”
Dita Mirela and implicitly the mafia’s involvement, piled up more Crimes against humanity attempts
against me degenerating in committing Crimes against humanity between 27th May 2017 and 8th June
2017, attempting then again to definitively liquidate me through the final solution in 12718/231/2017 as
objectivized in section A.II.1.3.1 of my ICC penal complaint
2.4. the “prosecutor” lies that I had a lawyer, who came on 17th September 2015, told he never
knew he was delegated in 2417/P/2014 then left meaning his delegation was falsified and he was smart
enough to create more problems for me through his presence cooperating with the mafia, until his wife
was co-opted in misrepresenting me in another dossier then I got mad and opened a penal dossier on
both of these “lawyers” for being mafia accomplices and committing the felony of Unloyal assistance or
representation. This lawyer wasn’t present with me in front of the “psychiatrist” charlatans as required
2.5 the “prosecutor” lies that article 184 paragraph 7 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
conditions are fulfilled when as proven they are not. See paragraphs 4.2 and 4.4. from annex 1 summary
2.6. the “prosecutor” lies dossiers 2222/P/2014 and 995/P/2015 were closed because the
ordnances were falsified for once therefore weren’t closed, and I usually “reopen” them by proving the
“magistrates” falsified acts of procedure of cover-up and accusing the “magistrates” in the same
dossiers. Being a target of state terrorism and wrongful political repression through Crimes against
humanity, I may have not had the time to accuse all the lying “prosecutors” in the same dossiers they
though they could cover-up, all the more the Crimes against humanity themselves are ironically a better
way to prove the criminal activity of the Romanian “state” mafia because of the gravity of the crimes
2.7. the “prosecutor” lies that “in the same sense” I claimed that from “an aggression” I lost the
“capacity to perceive human specific sentiments”, that is the “prosecutor” lies that “in the same sense”
means that I sued and lodged penal and disciplinary complaints against “judge” Dita Mirela for his
crimes and damages committed against me because I’m “mentally ill” which is obviously false because
justice is a right according to article 21 of the Romanian Constitution evidently, just as it was legally
predictably motivated in the dossier 11224/231/2015 in 2nd intance in which I annulled this
“prosecutor’s” instigation to Crimes against humanity falsified documents, the “psychiatrist” charlatans
falsified documents, and the falsified decision in 11224/231/2015 in 1st instance, all based on the same
obvious fake premises, as I objectivized in annex 1, annex 2 and annex 3
ANNEX 2 / ECHR Page 21 of 403

2.7^1 (see how the criminal downplays the Crimes against humanity he covers for as proven by
the fact same “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul falsified a closing ordnance in dossier 1863/P/2015
(829/P/2015) to cover for the felonies of the Vrancea county “legal medics” who refused to send me to
the proper medical specialties for cranio-cerebral trauma and falsified a report, then refused to retain
the diagnostics from those medical specialties I went anyway, then after I came back with a lawyer
falsified the report again claiming 2 MRI scans, 2 neurologist reports and 2 neurosurgeon reports are all
falsified to cover for the interloper Herghelegiu Danut who committed Bodily Harm and attempted
Qualified Murder against me in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014 as instigated by the
Romanian “state” mafia, respectively “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul is accomplice to the falsification of a
closing ordnance in dossier 246/P/2015 by another “prosecutor” Castu Vasile simultaneously while
“prosecutor” Mihaila Paul was abusing the judiciary system and “psychiatry” charlatanry as weapons of
state terrorism and wrongful political repression instigating that Crimes against humanity be committed
against me through 11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015 to stop me from denouncing the Crimes
against humanity committed against me by the Romanian “state” mafia in the night between 5th and 6th
December 2014. In the penal dossiers 1863/P/2015 (829/P/2015) and 246/P/2015 the abuses are also
tremendous such as refusal to administer the proofs respectively the “prosecutors” stole the proofs
from the dossiers and at the courthouse in the actions regarding my complaints against the
“prosecutor’s” falsified acts of procedure these proofs were destroyed then the “judges” lied they don’t
exist at all, meaning over 40 proofs in 1863/P/2015 (829/P/2015) and over 20 in 246/P/2015, as I
thoroughly objectivize in section I.B.22 of my ICC penal complaint),
2.7^2 and the “prosecutor” lies that he invokes proof “in the same sense” because the Crimes
against humanity committed against me in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014 by interloper
Herghelegiu Danut who hit me on the head violently, then while I was unconscious hit my head against
the wall and pushed me down a flight of stairs to make it look like an accident, as objectivized by the
proofs I gathered instead of the “state” mafia’s “gendarmes” and “policemen” soldiers who refused just
like the mafia’s “magistrate” caporegimes did as another evidence the Crimes against humanity
committed against me in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014 was concerted involving all the
institutions mentioned who were directed to refuse to do their job, then after I’ve been transported at
the emergency ward of “Saint Pantelimon” hospital in Focsani being poisoned covertly without my
consent with an injection in my right elbow by an unknown person believing I wouldn’t feel it,
containing the deadly fluorine neurotoxin risperidone or paliperidone - risperidone’s metabolite
meaning basically the same thing as objectivized in annex 21, sections A. I.A.II.1.3.1^2, I.B.22 and I.A.I.1-
2 from my ICC penal complaint,
2.7^3 are logically and causally unrelated with the rest of the schizophrenic “prosecutor”
Mihaila Paul aberrations
2.7^3.1 that I committed the aggravation circumstance of Judiciary Outrage which is an
aberration in itself as an aggravation circumstance is not a crime nor can it be inferred to exist without a
crime therefore it cannot be a premise for diagnostics either so all the “psychiatric” charlatanry
documents are falsified as proven just by this proof alone,
2.7^3.2 that I committed an aggravation circumstance for which the quality of suspect was
falsified against me which means I am suspected not known to have committed an aggravation
circumstance which as notoriously proven cannot be committed without an actual crime existing,
ANNEX 2 / ECHR Page 22 of 403

2.7^3.3 that by lodging penal and disciplinary complaints, and suing “judge” Dita Mirela for her
felonies and damages he committed against me I committed the aggravation circumstance of Judiciary
Outrage,
2.7^3.4 that suing “judge” Dita Mirela for the reparation of damages he committed against me I
blocked the activity of the civil section of the Vrancea Tribunal which is obviously preposterous,
2.7^4. logical incoherence, inherent occupational dysfunction and failure to recognize what’s
real of both “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul and “judge” Dita Mirela proves they are criminal schizophrenics
according to the DSM-V “psychiatric” charlatanry manual of diagnostics and statistics, and sociopaths -
persons who pervasively break the law and other people’s rights.
2.7^5 as obvious in the sense that the Crimes against humanity in the night between 5th and 6th
December 2014 could not have possibly caused me to lodge penal and disciplinary complaints, and sue
“judge” Dita Mirela for his felonies and damages he committed against me before the Crimes against
humanity he instigated were committed against me in the night between 5th and 6th of December 2014,
and that I continued to sue and lodge penal and disciplinary complaints against “judge” Dita Mirela and
his accomplices who attempted to cover-up the same crimes and damages through falsified decisions
and ordnances, does not just prove “in the same sense” is a lie because it’s causally impossible and as it
is an obvious lie by the fact exercising my right to justice according to the law is not “mental illness” as
the schizophrenic “judge” Dita Mirela claims and instigated “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul to aberrate
identically, just as schizophrenic “judge” Dita Mirela instigated the “psychiatrist” torturer Barbarosie
Carmen who committed Crimes against humanity against me between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017
as objectivized in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^7, I.B.6 and I.A.I.1-2 from my ICC penal complaint, torturer who
uttered to my mother but not me the same aberrations proving he was instigated by “judge” Dita Mirela
as corroborated by a plethora of other proofs as objectivized in section I.B.6 of my ICC penal complaint,
instigation made stringently clear by the fact between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 I was
“psychiatrically” incarcerated in the Focsani gulag for an impossible “examination” that couldn’t be
performed without my consent and cooperation as I objectivized in annex 16, impossible “examination”
disposed through the falsified decisions in dossier 4909/231/2017 derived from the falsified penal
dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 which were faked especially as pretexts, cover-up
stories and instigation to commit other Crimes against humanity against me to stop me from
investigating and denouncing the falsification against me of civil dossier 15730/231/2014, penal dossier
2417/P/2014 and the derived penal actions from it 11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015 like I’ve
objectivized in annex 8 and annex 9, which we also Crimes against humanity instigations as I’ve
objectivized in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^3-6 of my ICC penal complaint,
2.7^6 but it proves “in the same sense” is a lie demonstrating the mafia “prosecutor’s” attempt
to use the effects of the covert chemical lobotomy against me to falsify “psychiatric” charlatanry
documents using even my declarations which clearly do not describe being irresponsible and lacking
discernment because as a man I’m more biologically logical oriented not emotional like a woman for
having more neocortical mass, and because I’m preoccupied with logic professionally as an
informatician, therefore the Romanian “state” mafia’s Crimes against humanity through chemical
lobotomy achieved the opposite of its objective of stopping me from denouncing its criminal activity,
ANNEX 2 / ECHR Page 23 of 403

determining me to dedicate the rest of my life to its destruction as it eradicated all other purposes for
me which were given by sentiments or the ability to enjoy life.
2.7^7 As proof the Romanian “state” mafia members expected from the Crimes against
humanity committed against me through chemical lobotomization using a covert deadly fluorine
neurotoxin injection in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014 to either kill me as objectivized in
chapter 1 of annex 21, make me commit suicide or render me irresponsible, lacking discernment and
become homicidal as objectivized in section I.A.II.1.2.10^1. of my ICC penal complaint this deadly
fluorine neurotoxin causes, the central instigator “judge” Dita Mirela knew full well what happened as
proven by the instigation to Crimes against humanity thorough the falsified dossier 15730/231/2014 he
lodged immediately before the Crimes against humanity committed against me in the night between 5th
and 6th December 2014, and as proven by the instigation to Crimes against humanity through the false
declaration registered as the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 immediately after the Crimes against
humanity committed against me in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014, continuated through
other obvious instigations that the “psychiatry” charlatanry must be used to commit Crimes against
humanity against me as I objectivized in section I.A.II. 1.3.1^4, just as “judge” Dita Mirela knew of the 1st
Qualified Murder attempt from 27th October 2014 because he stole 2 civil dossiers simultaneously with
other 10 from the random distribution of dossiers system, 2 dossiers in which I sued interloper
Herghelegiu Danut, and falsified decisions of cover-up which is proof “judge” Dita Mirela assured
interloper Herghelegiu Danut of mafia protection, just as interloper Herghelegiu Danut was already
assured by the mafia “policeman” and “gendarme” soldiers that accompanied him on 27th October 2014
to double as false witnesses and cover-up story, then after the 2nd Qualified murder attempt and Bodily
Harm the interloper Herghelegiu Danut committed against me in the night between 5th and 6th
December 2014, he was obsessively protected against prosecution by the mafia “police” and
“gendarme” soldier institutions even up to the mafia “gendarme” soldiers general Mircea Olaru,
respectively by the same actors from the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes meaning this “prosecutor”
Mihaila Paul who instigated twice to Crimes against humanity through 11224/231/2015
14277/231/2015 and engaged in state terrorism while he and his accomplice “prosecutor” Castu Vasile
were simultaneously falsifying the decisions of cover-up of the Crimes against humanity from the night
between 5th and 6th December 2014 in dossiers 1863/P/2015 (829/P/2015) and 246/P/2015. As further
proof the Romanian “state” mafia expected from the Crimes against humanity committed against me
through chemical lobotomization using a covert deadly fluorine neurotoxin injection in the night
between 5th and 6th December 2014 to sufficiently brain damage me to declare me irresponsible, lacking
discernment, being violent and a public danger, the mafia attempted to put me under interdiction
through the falsified dossier 15730/231/2014 with no “psychiatric” charlatanry documents at all, just
the schizophrenic “judge” Dita Mirela’s declarations that the exercitation of the right to justice is a
mental disease which proves “judge” Dita Mirela is schizophrenic because this is the last thing a real
judge would utter, falsified dossier which was kept secret 3 months until it was clear for the mafia it
could get nowhere with it, then the mafia used penal dossier 2417/P/2014 to commit more Crimes
against humanity attempts against me as proven by 11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015 as
objectivized in sections I.A.II. 1.3.1^4-6 of my ICC penal complaint, falsifying concomitantly in my
absence the “psychiatric” charlatanry report declaring I’m irresponsible, lacking discernment, being
violent and a public danger despite breaking every relevant law, regulation, norm, deontology and logic,
ANNEX 2 / ECHR Page 24 of 403

and not only having no evidence but against the evidence that proved my innocence and mental sanity
even then, by the fact that having the falsified quality of suspect means I’m innocent according to article
23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution regarding the presumption of innocence and the deed
I’m was suspected of in the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 cannot physically exist because it’s the
aggravation circumstance of Judiciary Outrage, respectively I was all along army incorporable, have 4
legal work medicine certificates I’m mentally sane and apt for work with superior studies, was apt for
the superior studies in mathematics-informatics, informatics specialization that I graduated, as proven
by the logic of my pleads, witnesses and other proofs, therefore the mafia’s obsession was to make its
Crimes against humanity and expectations real at any cost not only because I was investigating,
demonstrating and denouncing already what I was proving and calling to be the Romanian “magistrate”
mafia at that time which in time I proved it’s correctly dubbed the Romanian “state” mafia, but also
because for the mafia members that committed honor crimes that backfire looked terribly bad on them,
which is why “judge” Dita Mirela appears so often as the central instigator to Crimes against humanity
from the beginning in 2014 until the last attempt in 2017, followed by the criminal clique he was relying
on that also failed, meaning “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul and his accomplices, and the others as fully
demonstrated in chronological order in section I.B of my ICC penal complaint, and in summary in the
preliminary section of my ICC penal complaint
2.7^8 Finally, I declared in penal dossier 246/P/2015 regarding the Crimes against humanity
committed against me in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014, which at the time I could only
prove they were the 2nd Qualified Murder attempt and Bodily Harm against me, not also Torture, Bodily
Harm and attempted Qualified Murder through deadly fluorine poisoning constituting Crimes against
humanity as I could objectivize now in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^2, I.B.22 and I.A.I.1-2 from my ICC penal
complaint of my ICC penal complaint, that from the Bodily Harm not the downplayed “aggression” term
uttered by the “prosecutor”, I lost the ~“capacity to perceive human specific sentiments” which is the
truth as I also declared in section I.B.5 of my ICC penal complaint at least, that I lost the ability to enjoy
life, such as in laughter, enjoying music, nature, movies, video games, reading, being passionate about
my work, socializing, being creative, vivid, etc. , being put in a state I call “the living death” by deadly
fluorine neurotoxic poisoning as Nazi concentration camp or Soviet gulag prisoners were as I
objectivized in sections I.A.II.1.2.6 and I.A.II.1.2.10, which is where these torturers learned to use this
particular poison, or as the Romanian “state” mafia created a terror cult in Romania with which I was
repeatedly threatened that I will be locked up by the “psychiatrist” torturers and “made a vegetable”
which instead I retain as yet another proof “psychiatry” charlatanry is neither medicine nor science as
I’ve objectivized in section I.A.II.1.2.1 of my ICC penal complaint, it’s institutionalized charlatanry used as
a totalitarian weapon of control against the general population by manipulating social conformity or by
applying the capital punishment of chemical lobotomization on human rights defenders who oppose the
regime, chemical lobotomization which obviously not only wasn’t enough to stop me, but it
concentrated my efforts by not wasting time on enjoying life as before thanks to the Romanian “state”
mafia, who ironically at the time also stopped me from considering about leaving Romania to start a
new life elsewhere, by amputating my interest in starting a new life and realizing at the same time that
no matter where I would go the mafia as it did in the years to come as proof of my reasoning’s
soundness, will attempt to liquidate me based on the principle of “not leaving any untied laces”,
ANNEX 2 / ECHR Page 25 of 403

meaning it was the mafia’s stupidity and paranoia that made of me an enemy for life as it left me no
choice
2.8. the “prosecutor” lies that I ~”continue to address multiple notifications to the judiciary
bodies, with incoherent content ... of nature to highlight the “doubt” about the psychic state of the
suspect”, because the “prosecutor” does not give one example of “incoherent content” because there is
none as my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures and ICC penal complaint demonstrate.
Furthermore the “prosecutor” never returned one of my penal complaints claiming it was incoherent
2.9. the “prosecutor” doesn’t have a legal recommendation for my involuntary internment from
the “psychiatrist” committee of charlatans according to article 184 paragraph 5 from the Romanian
Penal Procedure Code, as proven in chapter 4 from annex 1, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent
acts
2.10. see chapter 1, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
2.11. the “prosecutor” being schizophrenic does not understand the text of article 184
paragraph 3 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code that states that “the legal medicine expertise is
effectuated after obtaining the written consent of the person...”, because obviously without consent and
cooperation no “psychiatric” charlatanry interview can take place as it never did, and no “psychiatric”
charlatanry “examination” can take place indirectly according to article 10 from the Romanian Law
487/2002, which proves all the “psychiatric” charlatanry documents that were falsified in my absence
are legally proven falsified before I prove they are also groundless, self-contradictory and syllogistically
invalid as the “psychiatric” charlatans are themselves schizophrenic or logically incoherent and
occupationally dysfunctional, according to DSM-V manual of diagnosis and statistics
2.12. the “prosecutor” lies that “based on existing proofs (which don’t exist and were never
administered in 2417/P/2014, the quality of suspect that has been attributed to me falsely being proof
in itself there are no proofs against me otherwise I would’ve been attributed the penal quality of
accused) ... it is found .. (as if the positive proof can be made on inexistent proofs, meaning as I said the
mafia as usual is made up of schizophrenic and troglodyte peasants) ... that the proportionality between
the measure of involuntary internment and the scope under pursuit is respected, respectively identifying
and removing a state of danger to society (the violent behavior of suspect (meaning innocent, but the
schizophrenic “prosecutor” doesn’t know what he is saying) Raneti Tudor Andrei manifested in this
moment just verbally (there is no such thing as verbal violence except metaphorically, which is
subjective and has no place whatsoever in a criminal investigation but is a matter of the schizophrenic
“prosecutor”’s hallucinations, as exercising the legal right to sue and penally denouncemafia members is
not violent in any way obviously, nor accusing mafia members constitute a violent language even
metaphorically, meaning the mafia confuses its own fear of being put in prison for life, with the clarity
of my argument and declares it violent as it perceives its merited fate) that can anytime be followed by
one physical, material (which is why the “prosecutor” did nothing for 9 months in penal dossier
2417/P/2014, sarcastically speaking to prove the “prosecutor” lies)) and the necessity of defending
public order (by instigating to Crimes against humanity against an innocent as proven, against speaking
sarcastically to prove the “prosecutors” lies) , the rights and liberties of all citizens (nothing to do with
dossier 2417/P/2014, the prosecutor enters his schizophrenic speech pattern), as well as the
effectuation in good conditions of the penal process (which is why the “prosecutor” did nothing for 9
months in penal dossier 2417/P/2014, sarcastically speaking to prove the “prosecutor” lies)”
ANNEX 2 / ECHR Page 26 of 403

2.13. the “prosecutor” lies according to article 184 paragraphs 6, 7, 11 letter d from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code that the proposal of the “psychiatrist” committee of charlatans is
founded, as I proven in chapter 4 from annex 1 summary it is not
2.14. see chapter 5 from annex 1 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts

3. the decision in 11224/231/2015 is falsified because


3.1. of all the reasons invoked in paragraphs 1.3, 3.2, 3.5, chapter 4 from annex 1 summary, as
well as paragraph 2.13, from annex 2 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts, and for
being unmotivated in fact and by right according to article 403 paragraph 1 letters c and d from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code. Furthermore I requested that “judge” Craciun Constantin Catalin be
removed from dossier 11224/231/2015 for falsifying a mandate before subpoenaing me, and the
decision of rejection of my request was falsified as almost all of this kind are in Romania, certainly all of
mine were illegally, request based on article 64 paragraph 1 letter f from the Romanian Penal Procedure
Code and the proof of his lack of impartiality proven by him breaking the law with malice aforethought,
while exclusive obedience to the law is the sole guarantee of a judge’s impartiality according to article
124 paragraph 3 from the Romanian Constitution. As final proof, I annulled the decision in
11224/231/2015 in 1st instance in the appeal I made in 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance, see annex 3
3.2. in general “judge” Craciun Constantin Catalin broke the laws indicated in paragraphs I.3
from annex 23, which may contain extras case in which I’m speaking of attempts, as those paragraphs
were addressed to the laws breakings in the last Crimes against humanity committal and attempt by the
Romanian “state” mafia in 2017

4. the mandate from 11224/231/2015 in 1st instance is falsified because the “judge” knew right
away from the law most obviously that action 11224/231/2015 was inadmissible which he was suppose
to declare instead of falsifying this mandate, as proven by the following:
4.1. see paragraphs 1.1, 1.3, 3.2, 3.5, chapter 4 from annex 1 summary and chapter 2 which
attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
In conclusion the documents contained in this annex are all falsified constituting acts of state
terrorism through Harassment, Threatening and Blackmail, acts which later have been used as
instigation and implicitly complicity to wrongful political repression through the perpetration of Crimes
against humanity as the Romanian “state” mafia incrementally assured itself public opinion is dead in
Romania and nobody would be outrages as nobody was for the fact I was illegally deprived of liberty,
Tortured, Bodily Harmed and that Qualified Murder has been attempted against me continuously
between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 by being put in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days through
deadly fluorine and chlorine injections without treatment, then after I survived forced to take other
deadly fluorine and chlorine deadly neurotoxins as objectivized in annex 21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of
my ICC penal complaint. These documents are also null because all the falsified acts of procedure in the
falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 are null for being started off from a falsified dossier as I’ve proven in
paragraphs chapter 2 from annex 1 summary, according to articled 280-282 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code
ANNEX 2 / ECHR Page 27 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 2 / ECHR Page 28 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 2 / ECHR Page 29 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 2 / ECHR Page 30 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 2 / ECHR Page 31 of 403
ANNEX 2 / ECHR Page 32 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 3 / ECHR Page 33 of 403

Annex 3 inventory, summary demonstration, indicates full demonstration,

1. 1 page, annulment of the falsified decision in 11224/231/2015 regarding the instigation to


Crimes against humanity be committed against me as between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017
based on the identical dossier 4909/231/2017

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, particularly section I.B.20 and preliminary section 20

In conclusion the annulled falsified decision in 11224/231/2015 in 1st instance is summarily


proven falsified through this annex, falsified decision representing the instigation and implicitly
complicity to wrongful political repression through the perpetration of Crimes against humanity as the
Romanian “state” mafia incrementally assured itself public opinion is dead in Romania and nobody
would be outrages as nobody was for the fact I was illegally deprived of liberty, Tortured, Bodily
Harmed and that Qualified Murder has been attempted against me continuously between 27th May
2017 and 8th June 2017 by being put in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days through deadly fluorine
and chlorine injections without treatment, then after I survived forced to take other deadly fluorine and
chlorine deadly neurotoxins as objectivized in annex 21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal
complaint.
ANNEX 3 / ECHR Page 34 of 403

Tudor Raneti

From: Veronica Petrescu <veronica.petrescu@just.ro>


Sent: 28 octombrie 2015 11:47
To: tudor.raneti@gmail.com
Subject: solutie dosar nr. 11224/231/2015 - contestatie - 28.10.2015

Dosar nr. 11224/231/2015

ROMÂNIA
TRIBUNALUL VRANCEA
SECğIA PENALĂ
ÎNCHEIERE
ùedinĠa din camera de consiliu de la 28.10.2015
InstanĠa constituită din:
Judecător de drepturi úi libertăĠi: Dorel Hărăbor
Grefier: Veronica LucuĠă

MINISTERUL PUBLIC – Parchetul de pe lângă Tribunalul Vrancea a fost reprezentat de procuror


Gheorghe Mihaila

……………….
ÎN NUMELE LEGII,
DISPUNE

În baza art. 184 alin. 18 C.pr.pen., admite contestaĠie formulată de suspectul RANETI TUDOR
ANDREI, născut la data de 10.10.1980, în Mun. Focúani, jud. Vrancea, cu domiciliul în Bucureúti, sector 3, str.
THEODOR PALLADY, nr. 2, bl. M2A, sc. B, ap. 61, cu adresa de corespondenĠă aleasă la
tudor.raneti@gmail.com, împotriva Încheierii din 12.10.2015, pronunĠată de Judecătoria Focúani.
DesfiinĠează Încheierea din 12.10.2015, pronunĠată de Judecătoria Focúani úi în rejudecare, respinge
ca nefondată propunerea de internare medicală nevoluntară, formulată de Parchetul de pe lângă Judecătoria
Focúani.
Cheltuielile judiciare rămân în sarcina statului.
Onorariul pentru apărătorul din oficiu, în cuantum de 130 lei, va fi avansat din fondurile Ministerului de
JustiĠie.
DEFINITIVĂ.
PronunĠată în camera de consiliu, astăzi, 28.10.2015.

JUDECĂTOR DE DREPTURI ùI LIBERTĂğI GREFIER


Dorel Hărăbor Veronica LucuĠă

1
ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 35 of 403

Annex 4 inventory, indicates full demonstration and contains summary demonstration of falsification,

1. 1 page, an address from the prime-prosecutor to the “psychiatrist” charlatans announcing them
their recommendation for my “psychiatric” incarceration was found falsified in 11224/231/2015
2. 1 page, an address from the “psychiatrist” charlatans announcing the prosecutor’s office they’ve
falsified in my absence (illegally) the “psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise” anyway
3. 6 pages, the falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise”, illegal, groundless, self-contradictory
and syllogistically invalid, proving the “psychiatric” charlatans are schizophrenic and sociopaths

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, particularly sections I.A in general, I.B.19 and preliminary section 19

Summary demonstration of the falsification of these documents is as follows:


All juridical acts under the rule of law are only valid if they are a syllogistical inference from a
particular factual premise correlated with an universal law premise. Because all these documents lack
either the factual premise or is falsified, or break the law premise, they are all falsified. In penal matters
the judge must motivate in fact and by right according to article 403 paragraph 1 letters c and d, and the
prosecutor according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code

1. The address from the prosecutor’s office to the “psychiatrist” charlatans announcing them
their recommendation for my “psychiatric” incarceration was proven falsified, is falsified because
1.1. The “prime-prosecutor” lies omitting that his subordinate’s ordnance proposal for an
impossible “psychiatric expertise” without my consent is falsified as proven by being annulled in
11224/231/2015, and so is the falsified recommendation of the “psychiatrist” charlatans
1.2. The “prime-prosecutor” lies I committed Judiciary outrage, which isn’t even a felony. See
paragraph 1.2. from annex 2 summary and paragraphs 2.2.7 and 2.2.8 from annex 1 summary
1.3. The “prime-prosecutor” lies omitting to admit that the entire dossier 2417/P/2014 is
obvious falsified. Because the “prime-prosecutor” is the superior of the “prosecutor” who actually
falsified dossier 2417/P/2014, he is obligated to denounce his subordinate to the superior prosecutor’s
office to be indicted and convicted, but covers from him fulfilling the conditions of also committing the
felony of Constituting an organized crime group with his subordinate and “judge” Dita Mirela
2. The address from the “psychiatrist” charlatans announcing the prosecutor’s office they’ve
falsified in my absence (illegally) the “psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise” anyway, is falsified because
2.1. see paragraphs 1.3 and 3.2 from annex 1 summary, which attracts the nullity of all
subsequent acts
2.2. see paragraph 2.11. from annex 2 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
3. the falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise”, is illegal, groundless, self-contradictory and
syllogistically invalid, proving the “psychiatric” charlatans are schizophrenic and sociopaths, because
3.1. all the falsified acts of procedure in the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 are null for
being started off from a falsified dossier as I’ve proven in chapter 2 from annex 1 summary, according to
articled 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code.
ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 36 of 403

3.2. the decision in 10547/231/2017 was falsified therefore all the subsequent acts of procedure
are null according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code. See chapter 1 from
annex 1 summary
3.3. the “prosecutor’s” falsified mandate is illegal therefore all the subsequent acts of procedure
are null according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code. See chapter 3 from
annex 1 summary
3.4. the “prosecutor’s” falsified proposal for an impossible “psychiatric” charlatanry
“examination” is illegal therefore all the subsequent acts of procedure are null according to articles 280-
282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code. See chapter 5 from annex 1 summary
3.5. all the “psychiatrist” charlatans falsified arguments are proven falsified by the annulment of
the falsified decision in 11224/231/2015, which implicitly means the “prosecutor’s” falsified proposal
and the “psychiatric” charlatan’s falsified recommendation. See chapter 4 from annex 1, annex 2 and
annex 3 summaries
3.6. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie by omission to recommend themselves as charlatans
constituted in an organized criminal group because they obviously know this about themselves as they
know about each other, and cover-up each other’s crimes. I’ve proven in section A of my ICC penal
complaint at “psychiatry” worldwide is charlatanry, neither medicine nor science as I’ve objectivized in
section I.A.II.1.2.1 of my ICC penal complaint
3.7. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie by omission obviously not admitting the “(not) motivated
resolution from 2417/P/2014 from 17.09.2015” was annulled as unfounded or unmotivated or falsely
motivated and thus proven falsified, in 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance as they were informed as proven
by document referenced in point 1. The judge in 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance obviously motivated
that suing and penally denouncing a criminal “judge” is not a reason to doubt anyone’s discernment and
propose a “psychiatric” charlatanry “examination” of suspects and accused of homicide, being a right
not the aggravation circumstance of Judiciary outrage of which I can’t be accused instead of a real felony
3.8. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie that they have examined me on 17th September 2015,
proven by the “prosecutor’s” retaining I haven’t given my consent according to article 184 paragraph 3
from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code and article 11 from the Romanian Law 487/2002, and I
haven’t cooperated which made any “examination” impossible. See annex 1, the falsified mandate from
17th September 2015 from 2417/P/2014, falsified ordnance proposal for an impossible “psychiatric
expertise” without my consent, and annex 2, the falsified proposal that Crimes against humanity be
committed against me as between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 based on the identical dossier
4909/231/2017
3.9. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie omitting to mention they refused to denounce the mandate
th
from 17 September 2015 from 2417/P/2014, falsified as proven in point 3 of annex 1 summary
3.10. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie omitting to mention they were instigated to falsify the
“psychiatry” charlatanry “expertise in my absence (illegally), even after they’ve been informed their
falsified recommendation that Crimes against humanity be committed against me as between 27th May
2017 and 8th June 2017 based on the identical dossier 4909/231/2017 to 11224/231/2015, was proven
falsified and annulled in 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance
3.11. the “psychiatrist” charlatans admit they falsified the “expertise” on 23rd November 2015 in
my absence which is illegal according to article 10 from Romanian Law 487/2002
ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 37 of 403

3.12. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie they effectuated the “expertise” respecting my rights, as
proven by the fact they instructed the mafia soldier “masked police” to detain me for 1 hour illegally
based on the falsified mandate proven in points 3 in annex 1, after I’ve been harassed 6 hours before in
a futile attempt by the Romanian “state” mafia to destabilize me psychologically before the
“psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise”, by state terrorism through illegal home breaking at 6 a.m. for no
reason as I’ve been detained for nothing 3 hours until the “prosecutor” came at the prosecutor’s office
to just harass me with some more irrational behavior and refusing to effectuate any act of procedure, so
afterwards I was also tired from deprivation of sleep and nourishment. The “psychiatrist” charlatans
knew all this from me at least so they lie
3.13. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie they respected my right to medical assistance, as I received
no medical attention after I’ve been subjected to trauma by state terrorism on 17th September 2015
3.14. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie they respected the right to my defense since obviously lied
3.15. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie they respected the right to intimacy since they are
accomplice to the felony of Violation of property, before being illegally detained for 7 hours when
obviously I had no intimacy not even at the bathroom where I was followed by the mafia soldier
“masked police”
3.16. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie they respected the law regarding data protection, because
they are accomplice to falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry action 11224/231/2015 in 1st instance, already
proven falsified and annulled in 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance on 23rd November 2015 when they
falsified the “expertise” in my absence, which being public as the Romanian “state” mafia intended
breaking the law in this regard to discredit me, and the “psychiatrist” charlatans broke the law
themselves by not communicating immediately according to articles 32, 33 paragraph 5, 58 and 61
paragraph 5 from the Romanian Law 487/2002, article 28 paragraph 2 from the norms of application of
the Romanian Law 487/2002, at least the falsified “expertise”, which I managed to find hidden in
another dossier 2220/91/2015
3.17. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie they respected the rights of the “mentally ill” and
detainees. See 3.8. The only “mentally ill” in this are the “psychiatrist” charlatans and the rest of the
Romanian “state” mafia members, namely schizophrenic sociopaths as I demonstrated especially in this
annex, through their symptoms of logical incoherence, occupational dysfunction, respectively
mythomania and obsessive and pervasive breaking of the law and other people’s rights and sacrificing
their lives for justifying their charlatanry, according to DSM-V manual of diagnosis and statistics and
other “psychiatric” charlatanry “specialist” literature
3.18. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie they respected the rights of experts, which in fact always
come with obligations which they broke, such as the obvious obligation to respect the law and human
rights, which pertains to every “European citizen” from Romania
3.19. the “psychiatrist” charlatans again lie omitting to retain that as a suspect I am innocent
and consequently denounce the mandate from 17th September 2015 from 2417/P/2014 being falsified
as proven in point 3 of annex 1 summary. See 3.5 also
3.20. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie by omitting to denounce the mandate from 17th
September 2015 from 2417/P/2014 being falsified as proven in point 3 of annex 1 summary, also for the
obvious falsified motivation that ~“exists doubts about the psychical state of the suspect (for no reason
because the “prosecutor” hallucinates that a person exercising its legal rights is mentally alienated,
ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 38 of 403

which is actually the schizophrenic plead of “judge” Dita Mirela in dossier 15730/231/2014 against me
which I annulled needless to mention why) ... it’s imposed (juridical inference made without factual and
lawful premises, thus invalid) the effectuation of a psychiatric expertise about Raneti Tudor Andrei,
although he refused to give his consent in writing (which is impossible), as imposed by the dispositions of
article 184 paragraph 3 (in reality this article doesn’t impose me giving my consent which is an
hallucinated aberration I retain as a symptom of logical incoherence of the “psychiatrist” charlatan’s
schizophrenia. The article makes an “psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise” impossible without my
consent) (legal medicine psychiatric expertise disposed by the prosecutor according to article 184 from
the Romanian Penal Code”. I also retain the “psychiatrist” charlatan’s failure to abbreviate correctly as
proofs these are the same troglodyte peasants that are always found forming a sociopathic organized
criminal group because they can’t make it in life on their own, which I conveniently call the mafia,
recognized originally to be formed out of immoral peasants
3.26. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie copy-pasting the lies of the “prosecutor”. See paragraphs
chapter 2 from annex 1 summary
3.26. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie that “Mr. Raneti Tudor-Andrei hasn’t formally expressed in
writing his decision about giving his consent” because the refusal to give my consent is not required to
be given in writing, the “psychiatrist” charlatans obviously being bothered by the fact they knew it was
impossible to hold a “psychiatric” charlatanry “examination” which they admit is a “psychiatric
“charlatanry” interview or dialog, therefore they lie that I was “disposed to have a serious and
concentrated dialog” which I wasn’t and in fact I was sarcastic and mocked them but they were too
stupid to notice, and falsified the conclusion on their own that there is a “presumed medical consent”
while in reality there is no such thing which I retain as another symptom of the “psychiatrist” charlatan’s
schizophrenia, the failure to recognize what is real, including the fact I clearly have not given my consent
as it’s retained in the falsified mandate from 17th September 2015 from 2417/P/2014 and the falsified
ordnance proposal for an impossible “psychiatric expertise” without my consent attached in annex 1,
and the falsified proposal that Crimes against humanity be committed against me as between 27th May
2017 and 8th June 2017 based on the identical dossier 4909/231/2017 attached in annex 2
3.23. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie that “I worked 3 years”. In reality I worked 4 years from
2008 to 2012. For each year I received a legal medicine certificate that I’m psychologically sane.
3.24. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie about the lack of “physical antecedents”, subject which
they especially avoid mentioning aberrantly “it’s not the case” although knowing Crimes against
humanity have been committed against me in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014, by being
covertly poisoned with risperidone or paliperidone deadly injection as objectivized in section 21, which I
elaborate in my ICC penal complaint. The “psychiatrist” charlatans refuse to retain my 2 MRI scans, 2
neurologist and 2 neurosurgeon diagnosis, as the legal medics that falsified the report lying all these are
falsified to protect interloper Herghelegiu Danut who committed the 2nd Qualified Murder attempt and
the felony Bodily Harm in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014 against me, by violently hitting
me on the back of my head and throwing me unconsciously on a flight of stairs to make it look like an
accident, which he then lied as he was thought and as I proved he did using an audio-video recording
the thought he destroyed by throwing my mobile phone too violently as I found it dismembered on
another floor. This is proof the “psychiatrist” charlatans are accomplice to the Crimes against humanity
committed against me in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014
ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 39 of 403

3.25. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie that I’m “mentally ill” before even concluding the
impossible “psychiatric” charlatanry “examination” proving they are schizophrenic by not recognizing
the reality they deconspired the fact they were instigated to declare me “mentally ill”, which is obvious
as proven anyway. The proof is the quote: “3.1.6 Istoricul afectiunii psihiatrice actuale - nu se cunosc
date”, meaning as translated in English: “The history of the current psychiatric affliction - data
unknown”, which is a contradiction since they are at the same time retaining false data but declare
there is no data, given the false data is one year old at the time of this “expertise” falsification
3.26. the “psychiatrist” charlatans falsified section 3.2 of the “expertise” as proven by the fact
they threw together chaotically “psychiatry” charlatanry invented terms with falsified quotations they
attribute to me with no connection to reality, as I will demonstrate seeking the contradictions and
aberrations which show the “psychiatrist” charlatans weren’t thinking but just spewed text attempting
to fool the vigilance of the reader as a puerile student who tries to fool his teacher who superficially
checks if homework was done by just walking through the classroom glancing if there’s text is in the
student’s notebook, a situation I experienced in general school, and through obscure terminology. In
general this is proof that the “psychiatry” charlatanry documents always being subjective hallucinations
cannot ever constitute an objective proof in a criminal investigation as I’ve objectivized in my ICC penal
complaint section A where I demonstrated that “psychiatry” is charlatanry. The contradictions are also
proof of the “psychiatrist” charlatan’s schizophrenia, as I summarily indicated in section E that the
“psychiatrist” charlatans uttered the aberrant inference that represents this whole falsified “expertise”
that ”I’m most probably paranoid (lie)... having no discernment (lie)... because (!?) I have superior
studies, fast thinking and general culture (true)... and judicial history (lie)... and I’m violent (lie)”;
3.26.1. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lied at the beginning of their falsified “expertise that I
agreed to cooperate, knowing as proven in the “prosecutor’s” falsified ordnances that I refused to give
my consent to be a victim of the “psychiatrist” charlatans, then the “psychiatrist” charlatans
contradicted themselves declaring I'm not cooperating which is correct, then contradicted themselves
again lying I'm cooperating, as can be observed patiently reading the falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry
“expertise” which intellectually I grant you is like seething through a garbage dump, meaning the
schizophrenic or alienated and incoherent thoughts of the “psychiatrist” charlatans
3.26.2. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie declaring: “diffuse anxiety, inexpressive look, proper
clothing and hygiene”, because evidently I wasn’t having any “diffuse anxiety”, and the “inexpressive
look” was obviously from being tired for being Harassed, Subjected to bad treatment and Illegally
deprived of liberty for 7 hours on 17th September 2015, after being arrested at 6 a.m. reason for which I
rather doubt my hygiene and clothing either was proper not being allowed the time to tend to myself,
not that the “psychiatrist” charlatans checked meaning they are hallucinating filling words
3.26.3. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie declaring: “attitude ... partially not cooperating, initially
not trusting”, which is due to their mentally alienated and warped perception of reality, because since I
haven’t given my consent I was obviously consistent and not cooperating at all, and there was no trust
issue at all either because I knew the “psychiatrists” charlatans were criminals because they attempted
to hold the “psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise” illegally even before I was brought by force
3.26.4. the “psychiatrist” charlatans are contradicting themselves through the terms they
randomly and without any connection to reality used to fill the falsified psychiatric “charlatanry”
“expertise”: ‘”hipomobil, hiperserios” vs “nelinistit psihomotor” meaning as translated in English:
ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 40 of 403

“hipomobile, hiperserious” (I presume is the translation without internet) vs ~“unsettled psychologically


and physically” which in layman’s terms means the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie I was still in mind and
body, then they contradict themselves I was not still in mind and body, because these are not
observations but obvious schizophrenic quackery. Either way more meaningless fill words
3.26.5. the “psychiatrist” charlatans being schizophrenic did not realize my sarcastic mockery at
their address through my “I’m posing the questions here” attitude, as they retained that ”establishes
eye contact with the examiner, insistent, verbal discourse difficult to interrupt, high pitch voice, weak
affective modulations; increased notional baggage”. In reality not caring to discuss anything with a
bunch of “psychiatrist” charlatans, I had no affective state at all and my voice inflexions if any was acting
3.26.6. the “psychiatrist” charlatans are aberrating by declaring: “absent self critique”, because
in their “expertise” or juridical act syllogism where the inference is a diagnosis, the premises are
suppose to only be symptoms of an unhealthy state, and in general if not always as I can’t recall any
good symptoms of an unhealthy state, the symptoms are bad, therefore “absent self critique” is implied
to be bad or a symptom, which is aberrant because when I’m perfectly right as I’ve demonstrated,
having self critique would be contradicting myself since there’s nothing to criticize, which is the logical
incoherence symptom of schizophrenia, but because the “psychiatrist” charlatans are displaying logical
incoherence and occupational dysfunction instead through this remark, even failure to recognize what’s
real by failure to have even common logic, the “psychiatrist” charlatans display all the main symptoms
of schizophrenics according to DSM-V “psychiatry” charlatanry manual of diagnosis and statistics.
3.26.7. the “psychiatrist” charlatans are lying obviously by declaring: “consciousness of his illness
- absent”, which is proof of the fact they were instigated to falsify a diagnosis regardless whether a
“psychiatric” charlatanry “examination” took place or not, obvious because a diagnosis is placed
evidently after a “psychiatric” charlatanry “examination”, not before, or I was never “psychiatrically”
examined in my life with the exception perhaps of the army incorporation where I was declared
mentally healthy, therefore I retain this as proof beyond any reasonable doubt of the “psychiatrist”
charlatans intent to falsify a diagnosis with which to place me in a situation of vulnerability by
“psychiatric” charlatanry incarceration, and commit against me Crimes against humanity as they did
between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, and even before covertly on the night between 5th and 6th
December 2014, as they attempted Crimes against humanity 5 other times in between and after
through 15730/231/2014 (annulled), 11224/231/2015 (annulled), 14277/231/2015 (annulled in 1st and
2nd instance) and through their final solution 12718/231/2017 in ne bis in idem with 14277/231/2015
meaning proven falsified as well all the more I was sentenced in 1st instance for the crimes and diagnosis
of a person named Vasilache Daniel because I was never indicted, convicted or diagnosed, and in 2nd
instance the annulled falsified documents from 14277/231/2015 were invoked even as further proof
3.26.8 the ”psychiatrist” charlatans always throw in the term “hiperprosexie” meaning
“exaggerated concentration of attention” if you stay on the subject discussed, which I simply point out is
a good thing, therefore I retain this as proof of the “psychiatrist” charlatans schizophrenia. These
medicine college flunkies just learned a bunch of invented terms and as they passed their “psychiatry”
charlatanry exams, regurgitate them whenever they get the occasion. They’re an affront to
intellectuality and academia. Furthermore they throw the term “delirant” around whenever they are
contradicting me, term which means false ideation, which is not false or true simply because some
“psychiatrist” charlatans are attempting to cover-up the crimes of the Romanian “state” mafia,
ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 41 of 403

arguments which are true because I proven them objectively to be true, while the “psychiatrist”
charlatans did not prove they are false, nor attempted to contradict me, which is also proof of the
falsification of their “psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise” as it’s not motivated with fact and by the law
3.26.9. the ”psychiatrist” charlatans always throw in the term “hipermnezie” meaning “excessive
excitation of memory” if you show you can recall anything meaning have any sort of memory, else they
would surely use the term’s antonym “hipomnezie” or even “amnezie” perhaps - I haven’t researched
their quackery terminology thoroughly because I don’t need to, logic is enough. This alienated state of
mind of the “psychiatrist” charlatans is the reason nobody “exits their office” without a falsified
diagnosis, official or not, as the “psychiatrist” charlatans stigmatize everyone one way or another and
only falsify documents if they weigh their victim cannot fight back or take revenge, which in my case
they were grossly mistaken based on their arrogance which almost always accompanies stupidity, and
their bias the mafia is both numerically superior and holds the monopoly on violence and fear as if that
counts for intelligence, when in fact they are doing it to themselves, or fighting themselves, by helping
me denounce the Romanian “state” mafia criminal activity using their blunders. The lower in rank is a
mafia member, the stupider he will be because his boss cannot stand someone smarter than him be his
subordinate, and this is why if you meet a stupid, incompetent public functionary in office and wonder
how it is possible, it’s 100% guaranteed that functionary was illicitly hired and maintained in office for
illicit use by at least another. Furthermore to stay in public office and under a corrupt boss which is the
case everywhere in Romania I’ve noticed, the public functionaries have to stay stupid or become
stupider even to have “job security” and not arouse more infighting between themselves even because
they sociopaths - always vying for power, and this setup is guaranteed to stupefy them even further
having all their initiative and intellectual growth stifled constantly - it’s a culture of mediocrity and
decadence where criminals are praised in short. Since having memory is a good thing and the mention
has no place in the premises for a diagnosis as these “psychiatrist” charlatans intend to falsify without
being caught and fail, I retain this again as proof of the “psychiatrist” charlatans occupational
dysfunction even as charlatans which immediately classifies them as sociopaths not just schizophrenics
3.26.10 the “psychiatrist” charlatans being troglodytes use pleonastic speech: “asociatii ideative
rapide, tahipsihie”, the expression and the word quoted both meaning fast thinking, which again for
being a good thing has no place in the premises for a diagnosis as these “psychiatrist” charlatans intend
to falsify without being caught and fail, I retain this as proof of the “psychiatrist” charlatans
schizophrenia even as charlatans which immediately classifies them as sociopaths also
3.26.11 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie calling me hypochondriac after proving with 2 MRI
scans, 2 neurologist diagnostics and 2 neurosurgeon diagnostics that I have brain lesions from the
Crimes against humanity committed against me in the night between 5th to 6th December 2014, fact
which they try to hide in cahoots with the legal medics who refused to send me firstly to the proper
medical specialties to obtain these diagnostics, then refused to retain my documents to cover-up for the
interloper Herghelegiu Danut who committed Qualified Murder attempt and Bodily Harm felonies
against me that night. Not having internet, I seem to recall hypochondriac is someone who exaggerates
or imagines a reality and overreacts to it, which is not even marginally applicable to me because I proven
this reality objectively, acknowledged it and under reacted being rational not emotional, all the more
rational thanks to the ironic fact the amputation of my ability to enjoy life through the deadly fluorine
neurotoxin covert injection from the night between 5th to 6th December 2014, induced suicidal ideation
ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 42 of 403

because of sudden loss of all quality of life which is an existence made in hell or that I call “the living
death”, to which I am already adapted from a life time of misery in Romania, even in me who I am
rationally and philosophically against it, for months until I defeated even this which in Christianity is
known as Satan’s ultimate weapon again ironically since just weeks before I started praying to God again
for the first time in decades, and then grew stronger thanks to God despite this furious uncalled for
Romanian “state” mafia attack against me. Apropos, since I’m making this public I’m also making a side
note for everyone to learn about the reason suicide is useless, which is the fact nobody can escape life -
it’s an illusion as the differences between people when the scientific reality even has proven all men are
99.9% genetically identical or virtually (as good as) identical, which logically means if you have a problem
and you think you can get out of it by suicide fate will bring you back again and again until you solve the
problem because of the virtual identity between all men, and this is the truth behind the truly son of
God Jesus Christ commandment, to love your neighbor as yourself, because you are your neighbor,
which is a commandment put in the form of love on top of a philosophy that aids man to ascend to this
truth and way of life through belief since evidently God knew man cannot understand this truth
rationally even when faced with it scientifically like I am now exposing it, and as I’ve been experimenting
attempting to reason with people without success, and this is why man needs the institution of religion,
because religion is order and the irrational being that is man needs this order and plane of knowledge
he cannot achieve otherwise than through belief and love, and this is why Christianity is the one true
religion, because it holds the one supreme and holistic truth and the way to the greater good of all
3.26.12 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie I give “futile details”, which is ironic since the
“psychiatric” charlatans haven’t asked anything about the reality of penal dossier 2417/P/2014, or the
falsified reality of penal dossier 2417/P/2014, of course since they are working for the Romanian “state”
mafia and they won’t admit it even when it’s obvious, falsified dossier for which they were ordered by
the Romanian “state” mafia to falsify a diagnosis that I committed the fictive deed which cannot
constitute a felony even ad absurdum, fictive deed I wasn’t even accused as proof, but suspected of an
aggravation circumstance and not a felony, suspect meaning innocent according to the law, meaning by
all factual and lawful proofs the deed was proven to not exist and as proof nobody committed it
therefore nobody can be “expertised” by a “psychiatric” charlatan or committee of “psychiatric”
charlatans for it, less alone diagnosed with anything, and illegally under the penal procedure for
homicide and without my consent according to article 184 paragraph 1 and 3 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code, corroborated with article 11 and 12 from the Romanian Law 487/2002 - see paragraph
1.3 from annex 1 summary. The “psychiatrist” charlatans did not understand that they were attending
my interview, not I theirs, through which I was fishing for information which is why the details may have
been futile to them but not to me, judging them by their reaction to my “futile details” which indeed are
futile for them as they admit in the sense that these “futile details” cannot constitute premises out of
which a diagnostic can be inferred against me. In fact the “psychiatrist” charlatans admit I was
conducting the interview where they accuse me I’m difficult to interrupt, besides not cooperating, which
was part of my sarcastic amusement for being Harassed, Subjected to bad treatment and Illegally
deprived of liberty for 7 hours on 17th September 2015, defying their state terrorism which is the only
healthy way of thinking, for alleviating fear through a willful display of power, for maintaining self
respect and composure, for not allowing intimidation and terror to kill one’s mind as intended and so on
and so forth, being clearly the opposite of paranoid as I had too much trust in them confounding them
ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 43 of 403

for human beings out of the personal bias that for being human and superficially resembling them, they
must be also partially human at least, not suspecting them for their true degenerated animals nature of
sadistic torturers shown by committing Crimes against humanity against me between 27th May 2017
and 8th June 2017
3.26.13 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie I have false ideas about being the victim of a conspiracy,
which is a fact I proven well beyond any reasonable doubt in my ECHR and ICC complaints which the
Romanian “state” mafia certainly didn’t think I could and became increasingly desperate to silence me
observing as time and time again I did, until the Romanian “state” mafia’s paranoia degenerated into
committing against me the Crimes against humanity from between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017,
then after failing again it issued the final solution for indefinite to life incarceration, Torture, Bodily
harm and Qualified Murder as I objectivized in section 21, constituting the last Crimes against humanity
attempt at the same time which determined me to consequently become a permanent refugee from the
murderous Romanian regime
3.26.14 the “psychiatrist” charlatans aberrate that I have a tendency to perseverate in my own
ideas, being obvious that if I was not i would be logically incoherent which is a symptom of
schizophrenia, meaning is a good thing for one to perseverate in his own ideas, which is at the same
time pleonastic as expected from troglodyte peasants, reason for which this remark has no place in the
premises for a diagnosis as these “psychiatrist” charlatans intend to falsify without being caught and fail,
which I retain as proof of the “psychiatrist” charlatans schizophrenia
3.26.15 the “psychiatrist” charlatans clearly frustrated that I’m leading the discussion where I
want accuse me of “speaking too much” I think their quackery terminology means without checking
with the internet, and make the mistake of accusing me of writing too much also by throwing the term
“graforee” in, if I guessed its meaning correctly, because I have not written anything for the
“psychiatrist” charlatans during the “examination”, which supports my demonstration the “psychiatrist”
charlatans are throwing in chaotically every fill word that comes to their mind to falsify the appearance
of a founded “psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise” with at this point I observe a drunkard could’ve done
a better job perhaps
3.26.16 the “psychiatrist” charlatans make a reference to my imagination although I only
recounted real events as proven. Only explanation is that in their charlatanic ideation they think they
can attribute the Crimes against humanity they are accomplice of to my imagination, that I imagined
being violently hit on the head, thrown on a flight of stairs to make it look like an accident, covertly
poisoned with a deadly fluorine neurotoxin, then this bunch of “psychiatric” charlatans attempting to
cover everything up issuing a falsified a recommendation attempting to put me in a situation of
vulnerability to commit again against me Crimes against humanity as they did between 27th May 2017
and 8th June 2017 as I objectivized in section A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal complaint, recommendation
which I annulled in 11224/231/2015 proving it was falsified and everything I deduced is correct.
3.26.17 the “psychiatrist” charlatans aberrate accusing me of self esteem. Since having self
esteem is a good thing and the mention has no place in the premises for a diagnosis as these
“psychiatrist” charlatans intend to falsify without being caught and fail, I retain this again as proof of the
“psychiatrist” charlatans occupational dysfunction even as charlatans which immediately classifies them
as sociopaths not just schizophrenics
ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 44 of 403

3.26.18 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie invoking I have sentiments of frustration, which is false, I
have knowledge of frustration as the term means being stolen from or deprived of. In the criminal
culture, the criminals are accusing their victims of being frustrated with despise, since in a criminal
culture criminals are praised therefore their victims are worthy of despise and should also praise their
aggressors. These are sociopaths as a matter of fact and in short they think everything they do is good
and everything their victims do is bad and disserve being victims if they were, a quite stoic approach to
life philosophy, worthy of dark age animals that in modern age human society are locked in cages, while
even in the dark ages they were often hung if not killed on sight
3.26.19 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie that I self victimize. Since I proven in my ECHR and ICC
penal complaint I am the victim of 1 Qualified Murder attempt, 2 instances of Crimes against humanity
and 5 Crime against humanity attempts, I also proven that the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie, and of
course do not even attempt to prove anything as typical to liars
3.26.20 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie that I am “inadequate”, failing to specify to what. If they
meant I am “inadequate” because I do not conform to the criminal culture of the Romanian “state”
mafia, being instead a rule of law integrated citizen who has adopted the law as his own interior social
command according to the “psychiatric” charlatanry specialty literature about what discernment is, the
“psychiatric” charlatans only prove they are without discernment, both medical for attempting to falsify
the “psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise” and failing, and juridical for not knowing and obeying the law.
Being adapted to a profound “mentally ill” society is not proof of mental sanity but “mental illness”
3.26.21 the “psychiatrist” charlatans aberrate that I lack empathy for criminals, evidently
because I am not a criminal and I do not empathize with my enemies as only an idiot would, then
aberrate that I remember evil which is not really just a human ability but even animals recall evil men
and bad events meaning is only natural, and since is a good thing and the mention has no place in the
premises for a diagnosis as these “psychiatrist” charlatans intend to falsify without being caught and fail,
I retain this again as proof of the “psychiatrist” charlatans occupational dysfunction even as charlatans
which immediately classifies them as sociopaths not just schizophrenics.
3.26.22 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie I have resentments, which I don’t since I was chemically
lobotomized through the Crimes against humanity committed against me in the night between 5th to 6th
December. The “psychiatrist” charlatans do not understand that a man is not governed by sentiments
but by reason, because they are not men (and women), they are animals. Men pursue justice and have
religion, animals don’t, that is the difference between man and animal
3.26.23 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie I have suspicions, for which as a man of science I have
no use as for me it doesn’t even truly matter what I know, but only what I can prove
3.26.24 the “psychiatrist” charlatans contradict themselves accusing me of ~“selective will and
impulsivity”, because acting out of will and out of impulse are contradictory to my knowledge, as acting
voluntarily is contradictory to acting involuntarily
3.26.25 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie I have a bellicose personality, which is false given I
haven’t stolen my own rights but the Romanian “state” mafia did provoking me, then attempted to
Qualifiedly Murder me then even worse committed Crimes against humanity against me that left me
scarred for life in possibly the worst way, and I’m not an idiot and a coward to back down like a dog with
his tail between his legs, but according to the antic Athenian definition of idiot I’m the opposite, I’m
interested in public affairs and fight judicially for social justice which makes me a patriot and human
ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 45 of 403

rights defender, and also skilled according to my superior studies accreditation and legal work
experience with superior studies, so the “psychiatrist” charlatans are at least right about me being
combative when my life is destroyed, as one who isn’t is a traitor to himself which is the worst, and
many Romanians are like this. Even animals fight back when attacked, even cowardly ones, therefore is
only natural and moral meaning is a good thing and the mention has no place in the premises for a
diagnosis as these “psychiatrist” charlatans intend to falsify without being caught and fail, I retain this
again as proof of the “psychiatrist” charlatans occupational dysfunction even as charlatans which
immediately classifies them as sociopaths not just schizophrenics
3.26.26 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie that I’m excessively egocentrical, rigid and lacking
altruism, when in fact fighting for social justice and being a human rights defender is by definition
altruist. Being rigid is being logical or consistently mentally sane meaning is a good thing and the
mention has no place in the premises for a diagnosis as these “psychiatrist” charlatans intend to falsify
without being caught and fail, I retain this again as proof of the “psychiatrist” charlatans occupational
dysfunction even as charlatans which immediately classifies them as sociopaths not just schizophrenics
3.26.27 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie that I have major difficulties in integrating and adapting
to society - as I demonstrated before in paragraph 3.26.21, I am perfectly integrated socially. They also
throw in the word “family” which has no relevance as I don’t have any trouble with my family. Another
fill word
3.26.28 the “psychiatrist” charlatans aberrate accusing me that I deny committing a deed that
cannot even physically exist let alone constitute a felony. Summarily I prove my innocence through
annex 17 regarding my empty judicial history
3.26.29 the “psychiatrist” charlatans conclude with no premises proving themselves
schizophrenic against through logical incoherence and occupational dysfunction because there is no
such thing as a valid conclusion without premises or false and unrelated premises, that I have
“personality disorder of paranoid type with delirant decompensation” which is “psychiatry” charlatanry
quack speech for what in layman’s terms means that the “psychiatrist” charlatans want to make it
appear that my denouncements of the Romanian “state” mafia criminal activity is false or “delirant”,
“decompensation” meaning “as a result of” the “personality disorder of paranoid type” which is
generalized mistrust of others. In other words the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie that because I generally
mistrust others I falsify penal complaints about them, which constitutes the felonies of False
declarations, Inducing the judiciary bodies into error and even Disseminating false information since I
published over a hundred penal dossiers against the Romanian “state” mafia, of which I was never
accused as proof of verity of all my declarations and proofs, not even the Romanian “state” mafia not
daring to confront my demonstrations which are impossible to contradict, therefore “mistrust” has
nothing to do with anything as I’ve declared before suspicions mean nothing to me, not even what I
know but only what I can prove matters, and thus even the invalid conclusion of the schizophrenic
“psychiatrist” charlatans is proven falsified beyond any reasonable doubt. Actually “delirant“ means an
absolute conviction that can’t be combated with logical arguments, which in other words means false
ideation, except I am the sole owner of all the logic and proofs and the “psychiatrist” charlatans haven’t
made one attempt at contradicting me or proving their lies aren’t such because it’s impossible to justify
breaking the law, therefore I am right, and the “psychiatrist” charlatans are obviously delirating.
Because the delirant personality disorder is according to “psychiatry” charlatanry specialty literature
ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 46 of 403

that behavior characterized by unreal or hallucinated ideas that can’t be combated through logical
arguments, the “psychiatrist” charlatans therefore lying since they falsified the expertise on 23rd
November 2015, that I hallucinated the fact I annulled in dossier 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance the
falsified decision in 11224/231/2015 in 1st instance, the “prosecutor’s” falsified proposal and the
“psychiatrist” charlatans falsified recommendation for my illegal “psychiatric” charlatanry incarceration
for the purpose of placing me in a situation of vulnerability and commit Crimes against humanity
against me as between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, fact which I proven real in annex 3
3.26.30 the “psychiatrist” charlatans refuse to admit their recommendation is falsified, even
after they admit it has been annulled in 11224/231/2015 and proven falsified. That is what I call
irrational perseverance, of which they accuse me! The “psychiatrist” irrational perseverance is irrational
because it serves no purpose as their crimes are proven, and if my denouncement didn’t get them
convicted then the Crimes against humanity they committed against me were purposeless and paranoia
motivated since they also served no practical purpose but rather permitted me to address the
International Criminal Court for Crimes against humanity
3.26.31 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie I had greatly diminished discernment when committing
deeds that do not exist and cannot physically exist, proving again they are schizophrenic by displaying
logical incoherence and occupational dysfunction, according to DSM-V “psychiatry” charlatanry manual
of diagnosis and statistics. As proven by annex 1-3 and annex 17 I am innocent
3.26.32 the “psychiatrist” charlatans falsify another recommendation or instigation to Crimes
against humanity, invoking article 109 from the Romanian Penal Code which refers to convicts not
suspects which are innocent according to the presumption of innocence according to article 4 from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code and article 23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution.
3.26.33 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie that I am not aware of the “mental illness”, proven by
the fact there is no such thing as a “mental illness” which I objectivized in section A of my ICC penal
complaint, and furthermore the psychiatrists admit publicly that “personality disorders” are not “mental
illness” and have no medical treatment, therefore the “psychiatrist” charlatans are instigating to Crimes
against humanity as between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017
3.26.34 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie I am unpredictable in social relations which is obviously
untrue and unproven otherwise as a matter of fact - when a crime is committed against me I report it to
the authorities meaning I always seek justice not revenge
3.26.35 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie that I have irrational determination and perseverance,
proven by the fact that I rationally annulled the falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry actions against me
15730/231/2014, 11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015 in 1st and 2nd instance, this remark being
obviously the Romanian “state” mafia’s desperation to cover-up the Crimes against humanity they’ve
committed against me in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014 that involves very important
Romanian “state” mafia bosses - if I win, the Romanian “state” mafia falls and they all get prison for life
3.26.36 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie there’s a “risk of rapid escaladation from virtual
language violence (there is no such thing) to physical violence (a pleonasm)”. the “psychiatrist” charlatan
troglodyte mafia peasants also meant to say escalation not escaladation. Since there is no proof nor
complaint nor accusation or at least suspicion of violence against me, the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie
3.26.37 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie that the conclusions are based on the judiciary
investigation in which I am a suspect meaning innocent therefore it can’t be concluded that I committed
ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 47 of 403

a deed that cannot even physically exist anyway and I was suspected of an aggravation circumstance
proving the “judiciary bodies” are schizophrenic as well.
3.26.38 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie that the conclusions are also based on the medical data
from the “psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise” from 17th September 2015, when no expertise took place
as proven by the fact I haven’t cooperated as I demonstrated above, and because I haven’t given my
consent according to article 184 paragraph 3 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code and articles 11
and 12 from the Romanian Law 487/2002. Furthermore the “psychiatrist” charlatans forgot all about
dossier 2417/P/2014 as demonstrated by the content of the falsified expertise which doesn’t refer to
2417/P/2014, therefore no premise exists that could lead to a conclusion relative to 2417/P/2014
3.26.39 the “psychiatrist” charlatans contradicted themselves my penal antecedents are
unknown then declared I have a judiciary history which is the same thing
4. P.S. In fact after 17th September 2015 I had the distinct impression the “psychiatrist”
charlatans want everyone to be docile and idiotic slaves, as often I’ve been told by various Romanian
“state” mafia members I should arrange wares on shelves in French hypermarkets instead of pursuing
an intellectual career, about which the Romanian “state” mafia troglodyte peasants feel very envious for
being dumbed down by their own conformity to mafia culture. The “psychiatry” charlatanry is the worse
human disease on the planet - if let it would cut the legs and hands of an athlete because “he is trying
too hard”, as it’s self assured it can justify any atrocity by self imposed authority. Because I don’t have
internet I can’t research the rest of the “psychiatrist” charlatanry word garbage they piled up in this
falsified “expertise” but I proven sufficiently they are schizophrenic sociopaths
4.1 Need to mention the rather useless fact that because the general population perceive
“psychiatry” charlatanry as a legitimate business because it’s state accredited and thus has authority
because it closely collaborates with state terrorism apparatus or the state monopoly on fear comprised
in Romania by the mafia soldier “masked police”, “police”, “secret police” and “gendarmes”,
“psychiatry” is not investigated and therefore not found to be charlatanry, neither medicine nor science
as I’ve objectivized in section I.A.II.1.2.1 of my ICC penal complaint, except by the people who actively
think on the subject. In Romania it’s worse as no crime committed by the “psychiatrist” torturers is ever
investigated by the Romanian “state” mafia of course because it uses it to dispose of its undesirables
and even makes illicit profit by conducting illegal experiments forcefully on unsuspecting ignorants or
people put outside the protection of the law for going against the mafia as I did, and there’s no such
thing as malpraxis investigation as I proven denouncing and receiving the same falsified response of
cover-up as in the penal and civil cases I raised against the mafia members. I found myself in this state of
ignorance before, appealing to the “psychiatrist” charlatans for a solution to my suffering caused by the
Crimes against humanity perpetrated against me in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014, only I
received no help at all because it was the “psychiatrist” charlatans who inflicted the suffering by covert
poisoning, and in fact they don’t know how to fix anything because they aren’t medics, just torturers
and charlatans as I found out thanks to my quality to not stay stupid forever as the rest
4.2 The relevance of this mention is the fact beneath all “psychiatric” charlatanry fakery
meaning invented terms to resemble a scientific discipline and commercialization of poisons as medicine
because every medicine needs to have cures and treatments which is where the pharmaceutical mafia
pitches in, when in fact “psychiatry” charlatanry never cured or treated anyone of anything but hid it’s
capital crimes committed against humanity by the fact destroying the brain and mind of the victims, it
ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 48 of 403

makes it almost impossible for the victims to defend themselves or pursue justice as having no
perception of the destruction because of the destruction itself makes it almost impossible to detect the
problem to start with, and on the other hand the “psychiatrist” charlatans have been careful to only
target as victims from the lumpenproletariat and proletariat unfavored class of society who are
notoriously uneducated at the same time, meaning the petty felons, the poor, the young, the elderly,
gypsies or the undesirable put outside the protection of the law by the “state”. Notice any resemblance
to the nazi policy? It’s identical, as the nazis targeted the same categories of people, and the
“psychiatrist” charlatans owe their recent illicit practice to the books wrote exactly by the nazi
“psychiatrist” charlatans picked up by the allies operation “paperclip” of importing nazi “scientists”, who
to not be convicted for crimes of war and against humanity, invented stories about how they “treated”
concentration camp prisoners when in fact they were chemically lobotomizing them with fluorine to
eliminate dissenters, or claimed they were de-lousing their clothes with nerve gas which is preposterous
of course, when in reality they mass executed them by gassing them, then it was called the Holocaust
because the executed besides being buried in common graves, were incinerated in such large numbers
that soot was gathering on the roofs like snow, and those Germans living in those houses claimed they
didn’t know which is a very interesting social experiment because this is what happens in Romania, the
mafia commit crimes that “nobody sees” because of fear but not because the Romanians are good
people but because Romanians hope of someday entering the ranks of the mafia, which they do, and
this is why Romania has notoriously and officially 85,000 mafia “secret service” soldiers, rivaling U.S.A.
who is only 50 times bigger and 10 times more populated. Did you know that salt in certain countries is
poisoned with fluorine not just water? It’s for mass eliminating dissenters and facilitating mass control,
and as proof I invoke the notorious public announcement of president Vladimir Putin of the Russian
Federation who rejected poisoning his people, motivating Russia doesn’t need a brain dead population
from fluorine poisoning as in nazi concentration camps and soviet gulags, and made the criminal
billionaire George Soros persona non grata and banished his web of nation sovereignty undermining
NGO’s who were pushing a water poisoning with fluorine law in the Russian parliament, which is a
technique spoken of more than 50 years ago and hyped up as to belong to an “elite” group they called
after an extinct masonry lodge, the “illuminati”, documentary which can be easily found on
youtube.com, when in reality there’s a only as usual a bunch of sociopath red-necks who are typically
not of the worker class but social parasites, a numerous bunch, granted, according to the saying “stupid
but many”, forming an international mafia running around for self and common illicit interest in the
business of making everyone stupider so as to easily swindle everyone out of the product of their work,
as victim’s ignorance is the prerequisite of charlatanry which is why organized charlatanry naturally is
accompanied by a pyramid scheme, by sabotaging the education system to create generation after
generation of slaving idiots, by poisoning food and water, by mind poisoning through media negativity,
manufacturing consent by manipulating psychology such as conformity through pop culture out of fear
of ostracization, and leveraging human primitive psychology such as taking advantage of primal
instincts, eating, sex, fear etc. to replace as a human life style of continuous learning and self
improvement. Granted again, the fact the “banking engineering” is a charlatanry that has evolved in
time through trial and error, and many bankers got hung for it which is a fun fact to delight in that there
was justice in the past, and is not someone can perceive first thing in the morning, still the hicks who are
behind it and other forms of being a social parasite will never be anything else than hicks as a
ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 49 of 403

“professional” hazard, being a simple cog in a decadence machine. One who does honest work typically
does so to achieve a perpetual higher goal, if his life’s work is not intellectual and the goal in itself which
is continuous learning and self improvement, endeavor to which either way there’s no limit upwards
and the only way to happiness, that is through perpetual growth or self improvement which serves
oneself concomitantly through the betterment of society in which the honest worker participates, and
betterment of self through virtue honing. Because the honest worker in the process of achieving faces
adversity alone and overcomes it through his own power, although truth be told nobody has anything if
he hadn’t been given something which is the reason behind socialism to allow opportunity for growth,
the worker thus growing in the process to adapt to the challenges of life on his behalf and humanity,
and learning compassion and becoming a socialist after realizing one is part of the human continuum
and the world by the banal act of being born in it which is the clearest unavoidable proof of
“reincarnation” of the human blueprint, modernly demonstrated by the fact all humans are 99.9%
genetically identical. The honest worker who is therefore a truth seeker by nature recognizes this logic
as a natural result of his mental health and obeys reason, becoming a worker for the betterment of
himself and for the interest of humanity’s betterment in the process which he recognizes that it benefits
himself just as directly, while the mentally alienated charlatan meaning the one who because of his own
weakness is mentally ostracizing himself from this greater and holistic reality, works against humanity’s
betterment or for his own petty and immediate interests motivated by the same instincts he tries to
dumb everyone else down with, to have sex, eat, not live in fear etc., and even becomes dependent on
his victims adopting the life style of a social parasite, only seeking ways to swindle his victims out of
their work product, reason for which the charlatan does not grow because he chooses the path of least
resistance and never learns to overcome adversity, and ultimately is unable to work and survive on his
own, requiring others to do the work for him to steal and make the world worse for everybody, them
included, by instilling through example the culture of corruption throughout society which seems
seductive because is the easy path but it leads to apathy and self destruction because of it, as capitalism
is not about the betterment of human through imposed adversity according to the “entrepreneurs”
propaganda who often spout this nonsensical theory that the rest of the world needs them to be kept in
line as if the human race rose from primordial times and created civilization led by “entrepreneurs”
which is another word for slaver, and not great innovators and leaders , as capitalism is another word
for exploitation of others as obvious since capitalism is achieved through coercion - the expropriation of
means to earn a living from the masses who desperate out of instinct for survival sell their body and soul
for just living meaning eating and sheltering themselves. Civilization has been achieved through the
work and blood of revolutionaries who are always visionaries and pioneers - road openers, and has been
always stifled and destroyed by those who sought to justify their superiority psychosis by oppressing
others, and live an otherwise effortless life by stealing other people’s work. Capitalism has always been
about the exploitation of others, prostitution, theft and slavery, which are the easiest way to achieve
capital as I’ve spoken before it’s about the path of least resistance, and everyone is forced to do one or
another of these immoral and implicitly unhealthy acts in capitalism unless revolting, which is why
Project Venus is the solution, that is creation of abundance and implicit destruction of the capitalist
monopoly on resources that enslaves people to work for a living and holds back human progress,
meaning implicitly the elimination of the shackles created through the financiary fake economy in the
hand of the global “banking” charlatanry. Project Venus is at the same time the obvious answer why it
ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 50 of 403

isn’t implemented although is the most logical social solution, which is because the world is run by
sociopaths who do not let a revolution occur because is contrary to their life style, that of feeling falsely
superior, the “masters of the world” or rather the masters of slaves truthfully, psychopaths who
otherwise are incapable of creation, a state only achievable obviously by enslaving others and
destroying all opportunities of emancipation for humanity as well as for oneself, which is done in mass
like I’ve indicated before: by creating generations of idiots through the irrelevant education systems of
the world who eliminate free and analytical thinking; by poisoning of water and food through fluorine,
estrogenic chemicals and other neurotoxic additives to destroys creativity and intelligence, as in 18th
century beatings, mercury poisoning and murder were committed by the “psychiatrist” torturers to
impose the order of the corrupt as it was perpetrated against the Romanian national poet Mihai
Eminescu as proof, who was the biggest dissident of his time and had a gazette to use for propagating
his anticorruption speech throughout the country, and before in medieval times and since immemorial
times, physical torture and murder not excluding through poisoning of course as in Socrate’s case;
through psychological means of manufacturing consent by strengthening the primal instinct driven
behavior of humans and weakening the higher vocation of humans which is to ascend in God’s likeness,
because this “global elite” who is run by their sexual and digestive glands are clearly not human, they
are degenerated animals who’s instinct have taken over their neocortex which is why they are
promiscuous, gratify themselves through animalic territoriality display to show “social status” as any
animal behaves in wild, amassing in all manners of useless material possession, and also gratify their
animalic need to display their fake power superiority through abuse of the authority created by violence
through the monopoly of fear owned by the nation states of the world which is proof in itself that is fake
power since it doesn’t come from oneself but is the given usually to the dogs of the regime in power
such as in Romania’s case the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes disposing of the mafia soldier “police”
and “gendarmes”, who are actually also conditioned to brutalize the general population as a means of
control through state terrorism and wrongful political repression making weapons out of judiciary
system and “psychiatry” charlatanry, while the real mafia bosses are the only ones who reap the
rewards providentially on top of this social pyramid not having to work at all which is clearly the
scientific reason why only idiots adopt the philosophy of a criminal, because only far less than 0.1% of
the population can achieve the positions at the top of the capitalist social pyramid which are not even
guaranteed nor awarded but inherited and under constant assault meaning is not a position in which
one can even be happy unless that one is a masochist devil.
4.3 The capitalist social pyramid is built on fear which is known to naturally stifle growth
therefore destroy happiness which is why democracy works best with capitalism because it’s a system of
happiness lying propaganda and nothing more, that keeps enough of the ignorant as it is populace
distracted (such as through televised sports) and content (fed) which meets the old roman saying
~“pane et circus” meaning bread and circus, and is not built as it should by humans, on human feelings
like love and compassion which is God’s resemblance in man, a state of being which is only particular to
man and the discriminator signature or defining trait of man, meaning the need, understanding and
culture of justice, truth seeking and religion, which no other animal has and as a result man is superior
to animals and will eventually oust society’s cancer for the good of all as it has been for thousands of
years, conquering the Roman Empire ideologically and inspiring the modern secular constitutional order
of so called states of right around the world, cancer comprised of the social parasites that are the
ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 51 of 403

politicians, the bankers, the lawyers, the middlemen of all kinds, the corrupt and criminal etc., all which
can be eliminated as I remind by implementation of the Venus Project, or world will be hell until the end
if any. This reality is why the “global elite” is said by visionaries to collectively represent the antichrist or
worship antichrist, because they really are in the act of worshipping of obeying the antichrist which is
the idolatry or self government by the antichristian values of love of compassion, meaning hate and
contempt for their victims. Ironically the definition of their “psychiatry” charlatanry weapon of state
terrorism and wrongful political repression regarding sociopathy or antisocial personality disorder is
exactly that, the behavior of pervasively breaking the law and human rights, and sacrificing the lives of
others to achieve their illicit interests, and who are these sociopaths if not precisely the “psychiatrist”
charlatans, the politicians, the bankers, the lawyers, the middlemen of any kind and any of the corrupt
in general. This is why the “psychiatry” charlatanry must be destroyed and its charlatans incarcerated
like the animals they are because certainly being sociopaths they would find another way to destroy
civilization, the “psychiatry” charlatanry being a product of ignorance and an relic offshoot of the late
dark age inspired inhuman behavior, centuries old before the establishment of the scientific method and
modern medicine based on the scientific method, the “psychiatry” charlatanry being one of the most
insidious and certainly the most destructive weapon in the hands of the criminals, or as it was
notoriously dubbed to be “an industry of death”, because as notoriously known that hundreds of
thousands of people are killed annually by “psychiatric” charlatanry poisoning with or without their
consent but certainly in ignorance they weren’t treated but swindles out of their lives by the
“psychiatrist” charlatans in cahoots with one of the most lucrative businesses in the world, the
pharmaceutical mafia.
4.4 In conclusion the “psychiatrist” charlatans although observed that through the decision in
11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance I annulled their falsified recommendation for my “psychiatric”
charlatanry incarceration in the Focsani gulag, the “prosecutor’s” falsified proposal and the falsified
decision in 11224/231/2015 in 1st instance, still falsified this “expertise” as proven above at the
instigation of the “prosecutors” even though their arguments were annulled and proven falsified, with
the added difference this time the “psychiatrist” charlatans also had the motive of covering-up their
own instigation to Crimes against humanity, demonstrates their malice aforethought and obsession of
instigating Crimes against humanity against me to which the “psychiatrist” charlatans are implicitly
accomplice, as their falsified expertise later has been used as instigation to wrongful political repression
through the perpetration of Crimes against humanity as the Romanian “state” mafia incrementally
assured itself public opinion is dead in Romania and nobody would be outrages as nobody was for the
fact I was illegally deprived of liberty, Tortured, Bodily Harmed and that Qualified Murder has been
attempted against me continuously between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 by being put in
anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days through deadly fluorine and chlorine injections without treatment,
then after I survived forced to take other deadly fluorine and chlorine deadly neurotoxins as objectivized
in annex 21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal complaint. These documents are also null because
all the falsified acts of procedure in the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 are null for being started off
from a falsified dossier as I’ve proven in paragraphs chapter 2 from annex 1 summary, according to
articled 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 52 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 53 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 54 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 55 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 56 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 57 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 58 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 4 / ECHR Page 59 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 5 / ECHR Page 60 of 403

Annex 5 inventory, summary demonstration of falsification, indicates full demonstration,

1. 2 page, another falsified “prosecutor’s” ordnance instigating that Crimes against humanity be
committed against me as between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, falsified the same in
14277/231/2015 as in ne bis in idem dossier 12718/231/2017, based on the “psychiatric”
charlatanry “expertise” falsified in my absence and without my consent on 23rd November 2015,
“ordnance” who hides by breaking the law the fact the previous same “prosecutor’s” falsified
ordnance and “psychiatric” charlatanry falsified recommendation, instigations that Crimes
against humanity be committed against me, were annulled in 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance,
therefore all the falsified motives in these falsified ordnance and “psychiatry” charlatanry
“expertise” were already annulled thus declared inadmissible in 14277/231/2015 in 1st instance
2. 1 page, annulment as of the falsified “prosecutor’s” ordnance regarding the instigation to
Crimes against humanity be committed against me as between 27th May 2017 and 8th June
2017, falsified the same in 14277/231/2015 as in ne bis in idem dossier 12718/231/2017

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, particularly section I.B.18 and preliminary section 18

Summary demonstration of the falsification of these documents is as follows:


All juridical acts under the rule of law are only valid if they are a syllogistical inference from a
particular factual premise correlated with an universal law premise. Because all these documents lack
either the factual premise or is falsified, or break the law premise, they are all falsified. In penal matters
the judge must motivate in fact and by right according to article 403 paragraph 1 letters c and d, and the
prosecutor according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code

1. “prosecutor’s” ordnance instigating that Crimes against humanity be committed against me


as between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, falsified the same in 14277/231/2015 as in ne bis in idem
dossier 12718/231/2017, based on the “psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise” falsified in my absence and
without my consent on 23rd November 2015, “ordnance” who hides by breaking the law the fact the
previous same “prosecutor’s” falsified ordnance and “psychiatric” charlatanry falsified recommendation,
instigations that Crimes against humanity be committed against me, were annulled in 11224/231/2015
in 2nd instance, therefore all the falsified motives in these falsified ordnance and “psychiatry”
charlatanry “expertise” were already annulled thus declared inadmissible in 14277/231/2015 in 1st
instance, is falsified because:
1.1. see paragraph 1.2 from annex 2 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
1.2. see chapter 2 from annex 1 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
1.3. see paragraphs 2.7-2.8 from annex 2 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent
acts
1.4. see chapter 5 from annex 1 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts.
Furthermore, it was annulled in 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance as unfounded or falsified, which attracts
the nullity of all subsequent acts, and the “prosecutors” hides this breaking the law, article 286
ANNEX 5 / ECHR Page 61 of 403

paragraph 2 letters b, c, d, e from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, reason for which his falsified
ordnance was declared inadmissible although the superior prosecutor’s office should’ve been notified
and consequently this “prosecutor” indicted and convicted. This “prosecutor” was also protected by the
Romanian “state” mafia from legally predictable disciplinary lay-off from the Romanian Superior
Magistrate Council, meaning the whole judiciary system is corrupt like I’ve proven
1.5. the “prosecutor” lies by omission about the falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise”,
hiding the fact it’s obviously falsified as proven in chapter 3 from annex 4 summary, and hiding the fact
the “psychiatric” falsified “recommendation” meaning the same falsified grounds as in the “expertise”
were annulled in 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts also,
therefore the “prosecutor” falsified the conclusion using false premises which constitutes proof beyond
any reasonable doubt of the instigation that Crimes against humanity be committed against me as
between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 as objectivized in section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal
complaint, corroborated with the desperation of the “prosecutor” to falsify repeatedly acts of
instigation to Crimes against humanity to cover-up the Crimes against humanity perpetrated against
me in the night between 5th and 6th December 2016, and the Crimes against humanity attempts
committed through 15730/231/2014 and 11224/231/2015, and the 1st Qualified Murder attempt from
27th October 2014, and the implication of the “legal medics” for the cover-up of the 2nd Qualified
Murder and Bodily Harm perpetrated by the interloper Herghelegiu Danut against me in the night
between 5th and 6th December 2014, and other felonies related which implicate the mafia soldiers from
“police” and “gendarmerie” all the way to the top in the Ministry of interior affairs where I caught the
“gendarmes” mafia soldiers general Mircea Olaru, a notorious Romanian mafia criminal according to the
press, intervening in person to cover-up the Crimes against humanity perpetrated against me in the
night between 5th and 6th December 2016, and of course the Romanian “state” mafia felonies I’ve
denounced before, for which it committed Crimes against humanity against me
1.6. see paragraph 3.26.32 from annex 4 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent
acts - I’m not a convict therefore article 109 from the Romanian Penal Code doesn’t apply to me

In conclusion the documents contained in this annex are all falsified constituting instigation and
implicitly complicity to wrongful political repression through the perpetration of Crimes against
humanity as the Romanian “state” mafia incrementally assured itself public opinion is dead in Romania
and nobody would be outrages as nobody was for the fact I was illegally deprived of liberty, Tortured,
Bodily Harmed and that Qualified Murder has been attempted against me continuously between 27th
May 2017 and 8th June 2017 by being put in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days through deadly
fluorine and chlorine injections without treatment, then after I survived forced to take other deadly
fluorine and chlorine deadly neurotoxins as objectivized in annex 21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC
penal complaint. These documents are also null because all the falsified acts of procedure in the falsified
penal dossier 2417/P/2014 are null for being started off from a falsified dossier as I’ve proven in
paragraphs chapter 2 from annex 1 summary, according to articled 280-282 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code
ANNEX 5 / ECHR Page 62 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 5 / ECHR Page 63 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 5 / ECHR Page 64 of 403
ANNEX 6 / ECHR Page 65 of 403

Annex 6 inventory, summary demonstration of falsification, indicates full demonstration,

1. 6 page, the falsified “prosecutor’s” ordnance from 10th December 2015 of renunciation of penal
pursuit in falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, particularly section I.B.18 and preliminary section 18

Summary demonstration of the falsification of these documents is as follows:


All juridical acts under the rule of law are only valid if they are a syllogistical inference from a
particular factual premise correlated with an universal law premise. Because all these documents lack
either the factual premise or is falsified, or break the law premise, they are all falsified. In penal matters
the judge must motivate in fact and by right according to article 403 paragraph 1 letters c and d, and the
prosecutor according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code

1. “Prosecutor’s” ordnance of renunciation of penal pursuit in falsified penal dossier


2417/P/2014 is falsified because:
1.1. according to article 275 paragraph 2 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code only the
accused can be obligated to pay judiciary expenses, and I had the falsified quality of suspect in the
falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014. Article 275 is unconstitutional regardless because the suspect and
accused are innocent according to article 23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution, and articles
4 and 99 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1.2. see paragraph 1.2 from annex 2 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
1.3. see chapter 2 from annex 1 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
1.4. see paragraphs 2.7 from annex 2 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
1.5. “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul as instigated by “judge” Dita Mirela lied using quotes even, that I
declared that “judge” Dita Mirela, mot-a-mot: “... damaged person , Dita Mirela ... sustained ... that
Raneti Tudor Andrei ... threatened ... ‘her to be put to the wall and shot’ ...” which constitutes the
felonies of False declarations and Inducing the judiciary bodies into error committed by “judge” Dita
Mirela, and felonies of service abuse, falsification of documents, corruption, against the liberty of the
person, other felonies and instigation to Crimes against humanity be committed against me as proven
by the fact I opened penal dossiers against “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul as instigated by “judge” Dita and
they were never acquitted, respectively I was never accused of the felonies of False declarations,
Inducing the judiciary bodies into error with false proofs or Disseminating false informations by
publishing the penal dossiers I made against the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes. The instigation to
Crimes against humanity is proven through chapter 2 of annex 2 summary, corroborated with the fact
this falsified ordnance from 10th December 2015 was hidden on 11th December 2015 from the falsified
dossier 14277/231/2015 in 1st instance because it proved I had no passive penal quality from the
moment the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 was closed which is a typical Romanian “state” mafia
mistake because it has no respect for law and logic, and corroborated with the fact that as in the
falsified “prosecutor’s” instigation that Crimes against humanity be committed through
ANNEX 6 / ECHR Page 66 of 403

14277/231/2015 in 1st instance as proven by chapter 1 from annex 5 summary, in this falsified ordnance
it is also hidden the fact I annulled the falsified as proven by chapter 2 from annex 2 summary
“prosecutor’s” instigation that Crimes against humanity be committed through 11224/231/2015 in 1st
instance, as proven in annex 3 summary regarding the solution in 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance,
mention which is obligatory according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter e from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code, fact which was also mentioned in the decision in 14277/231/2015 in 1st instance
1.6 see paragraph 2.3-2.4 from annex 2 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent
acts
1.7 see paragraph 2.2.8 from annex 1 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
1.8 see paragraph 5.2 from annex 1 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
1.9 see paragraph 2.6-2.8 from annex 2 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent
acts
1.10 the “prosecutor” lies by omission hiding the fact he committed state terrorism through
illegal home breaking instigating 4 mafia “masked police” and 2 “policemen” soldiers on 17th September
2015 to arrest and detain me 7 hours from 6 a.m. to harass and subject me to bad treatments as proven
by all chapters of annex 1 summary,
1.10^1 as well as the fact I did not consent to justify the “psychiatry” charlatanry occupation
according to article 184 paragraph 3 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code according to which no
“psychiatric” charlatanry “examination” can take place without my consent because it cannot physically
take place if I do not consent and cooperate, meaning the “prosecutor” tries to induce into error that a
“psychiatric” charlatanry “examination” took place to make it appear that the “psychiatrist” charlatans
did not fake documents on 23rd November 2015 afterwards, and indeed...
1.11 the “prosecutor” lies that the falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry document registered as
970/A1-P/232 was faked on 17th September 2015 when in reality it was faked on 23rd November 2015 as
I proven annex 4, fact which the “prosecutor” also tries to hide by omission
1.12 see paragraph 1.5 from annex 5 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts.
See annex 4 summary regarding the demonstration of the falsification of the “psychiatric” charlatanry
document registered as 970/A1-P/232, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
1.13 the “prosecutor” lies that article 109 from the Romanian Penal Code regarding security
measures applies to me, because security measures are only applicable to convicts according to the text
of the law, not the suspects or accused, reminding I had the falsified quality of suspect of an aggravation
circumstance not a crime in the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 before this falsified ordnance from
10th December 2015 of renunciation of penal pursuit, and afterwards I had no penal quality. See
paragraph 3.26.32 from annex 4 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts - I’m not a
convict therefore article 109 from the Romanian Penal Code doesn’t apply to me
1.14 the criminal schizophrenic “prosecutor” as typical distances himself from his crimes using
an impersonal expression that “it was solicited” that Crimes against humanity be committed against
me, as if the criminal schizophrenic “prosecutor” was an observer not the instigator and falsifier of all
acts of procedure in the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014, instead of using the correct expression “I
solicited”. The criminal schizophrenic “prosecutor” also attempts to reinforce his lie that I’m a convict
not a suspect in his falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 by affirming schizophrenically meaning
contradicting himself that “the suspect Raneti Tudor Andrei ... being registered ... in penal dossier
ANNEX 6 / ECHR Page 67 of 403

14277/231/2015”, when in reality only an accused can be indicted and convicted and appear in a
courthouse penal dossier as a defendant, and when in fact only the proposal or instigation that Crimes
against humanity be committed against me is registered in 14277/231/2015 in which it was annulled as
inadmissible then unfounded as obviously is, and I was never indicted, convicted or diagnosed with
anything ever as proven by annex 17, annex 18, annex 19 and annex 22 regarding my empty judicial
history, other declarations of the mafia “judiciary bodies” who admit I was never indicted and convicted,
respectively proof that I’m still army incorporable, apt for superior studies as certified by the family
doctor, fact corroborated with the 4 legal work medicine certificates invoked through annex 20 attesting
I’m mentally sane and apt for work with superior studies as correspondent to the 4 years I worked
legally as an IT programmer
1.15 the “prosecutor” lied that I wasn’t heard on 17th September 2015 because I refused to give
declarations. In reality because on 17th September 2015 “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul refused to give me a
piece of paper to write my declarations, I declared verbally to prosecutor” Mihaila Paul demonstrating
his felonies he committed through the falsification of all acts of procedure in 2417/P/2014 and this
penal dossier itself, and as proof I had to make a written mention of the falsification of all acts of
procedure in 2417/P/2014 on the bottom of the page on which I signed I was informed of my rights as a
suspect, the page supposedly containing all my rights which was irrelevant since they weren’t respected
1.16 see paragraph 2.7^3.1 from annex 2 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent
acts. The schizophrenic “prosecutor” attempted to correct himself after judicially aberrating by declaring
the aggravation circumstance of Judiciary outrage the object of the falsified dossier 2417/P/2014 as
expected from an occupationally dysfunctional schizophrenic, by mentioning the felony of Threatening is
the crime for which Judiciary outrage is an aggravation circumstance of.
1.16^1 As factual proof , the schizophrenic “prosecutor” made this correction and mention for
the first time in all the falsified acts of procedure in the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 as
demonstrated by annex 1, annex 2, annex 4 and annex 5, only after he read my pleads through which I
annulled his falsified acts of procedure, correction which is worthless since the in rem and in personam
ordnances falsified by the prosecutor demonstrate there was never a prosecution for the felony of
Threatening because no such deed exist, which constitutes proof of tacit admissal by the “prosecutor”
no such deed exists, and the declarations, proofs and all acts of procedure from 2417/P/2014 are all
falsified.
1.16^2 As legal proof, a prosecutor cannot dispose the renunciation of penal pursuit against a
suspect or accused declaring they are convicts, as demonstrated by the fact article 318 from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code was declared unconstitutional soon after in the next year, and the
schizophrenic “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul never attempted to open again the falsified penal dossier
2417/P/2014, put into motion the penal action, indict me and send the dossier at the courthouse for a
falsified conviction which I suspect it wouldn’t have happened because it never happened in all the 4
falsified penal dossiers against me as proven by annex 17 regarding my empty judicial history, which is
why the “prosecutor” never attempted it corroborated with the fact it was never his intention to even
falsely convict me, but just fake the pretext and cover-up story and instigate that Crimes against
humanity be committed against me for the purpose of stopping me from investigating, discovering and
denouncing the Romanian “state” mafia Crimes against humanity against me and others, as I did as
proven by section I.A. of my ICC penal complaint.
ANNEX 6 / ECHR Page 68 of 403

1.16^3 The “prosecutor” lies that “I have limited possibility of understanding the consequences
of the felony committed”,
1.16^3.1 because no deed exists in the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 that can constitute a
felony,
1.16^3.2 because the object of the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 is not a felony but the
aggravation circumstance of Judiciary outrage which cannot possibly exist,
1.16^3.3 because the falsified quality of suspect means I’m believed not proven to have
committed a felony which can only be legally proven through a definitive courthouse decision according
to article 23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution regarding the presumption of innocence
1.16^3.4 because I as demonstrated through my pleads have far superior possibility of
understanding the law and juridical logic as opposed to the schizophrenic “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul and
“judge” Dita Mirela who evidently are retarded criminal sociopaths since they have not only gained
nothing from committing Crimes against humanity against me but have aided my investigation,
discovery and denunciation of the Romanian “state” mafia by their stupidity
1.16^3.5 because even the falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry document attached as annex 4
presents a presumptive falsified diagnostic which by definition is subjective and cannot constitute proof,
besides being illegal, groundless, self-contradictory and syllogistically invalid as demonstrated in annex 4
1.16^4 the “prosecutor” demonstrates he is schizophrenic again retaining that the mode and
means of committing the felony being the “content of the correspondence sent by this one to the
judiciary bodies, in electronic format, is accessible to a limited number of persons” means there’s no
public interest in the penal pursuit of the felony, because
1.16^4.1 “content of the correspondence sent to the judiciary bodies, in electronic format”
means that I addressed petitions to the judicial bodies through which the schizophrenic “prosecutor”
Mihaila Paul and “judge” Dita Mirela declared aberrantly I committed the aggravation circumstance of
Judiciary outrage which is not a crime just because I filed penal and disciplinary complaints, and sued
them which is of course is not a crime and aberrant and as to be expected of occupationally
dysfunctional schizophrenics, as retained in dossier 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance through which I
annulled their falsified documents instigating that Crimes against humanity be committed against me.
Furthermore the state terrorism committed through illegal home breaking on 17th September 2015
coincides with the period right after I lodged a penal complaint against the schizophrenic “prosecutor”
Mihaila Paul and “judge” Dita Mirela for falsifying penal dossier 2417/P/2014
1.16^4.2 “is accessible to a limited number of persons” meaning that the aggravation
circumstance of Judiciary outrage of only the schizophrenic “judge” Dita Mirela complained although
I’ve lodged penal and disciplinary complaints, and sued tens of mafia “magistrates” from the counties of
Vrancea, Galati and the capital city Bucharest at least, is not of public interest because “is accessible to a
limited number of persons” which is a contradiction as aforementioned that not only I investigated,
discovered and denounced a wide number of mafia “magistrate” caporegimes, statistically in fact 100%
of all mafia “magistrate” caporegimes with which I interacted demanding my rights by which I’ve proven
all the “magistrates” in Romania are corrupt respectively about 86% are criminal, but I published their
penal dossiers on the forum militia.freeforums.net and referenced them on facebook.com for years
where they were accessible by an unlimited number of persons being public, until the mafia illegally
censored them simultaneously during the almost daily arrests before Orthodox Easter 2017 when the
ANNEX 6 / ECHR Page 69 of 403

mafia planned to commit Crimes against humanity on Orthodox Easter 2017 in typical “communist”
mafia fashion who targets to commit crimes especially on significant days, such as falsifying the
decisions in 11224/231/2015 and 12718/231/2017 that Crimes against humanity be committed against
me within 1-2 days of my birthday, and harassing me during Christmas, the winter holydays and during
Orthodox Easter 2016 with the falsified actions in dossier 14277/231/2015. This also proves I have the
ability to investigate, discover and denounce any of the Romanian “state” mafia, which I do, and this is
the concern of the mafia for which it committed 2 Crimes against humanity committals and 6 Crimes
against humanity attempts, to stop me from denouncing its criminal activity, and this the mafia
members declared the “public interest”
1.16^4.3 that the mafia members feeling threatened by the fact my investigation, discovery and
denouncement of their criminal activity leading to possible conviction for them, is not a felony but is of
public interest and the activity of real policemen, prosecutors and judges, none of which exist in
Romanian as proven by the fact I am the only one investigating and denouncing the Romanian “state”
mafia in its entirety and especially the criminal activity of the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes - because
is the easiest to target because their work attributions are very clearly defined in the law and the mafia
imbeciles send me almost all the document proofs I need ironically being about the only law they
seldom uphold when they shouldn’t, proving they are occupationally dysfunctional schizophrenics even
as mafia members, which instead catalogues them immediately as sociopaths for being organized crime
members
1.16^5 the “prosecutor” admits he didn’t put into motion the penal action and did not create
and indictment with which he is obligated to notify the courthouse that I be judged guilty or innocent,
meaning the “prosecutor” admits I’m innocent according to articles 4 and 99 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code, article 23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution, articles 11 and 20 from
Romanian Constitution that makes Romanian ratified international treaties internal right meaning article
11 from the Universal declaration of human rights and article 6 paragraph 2 from the European
convention of human rights, therefore the “prosecutor” admits he instigated that Crimes against
humanity be committed against an innocent in 11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015 since this was
always the mafia’s motive as objectivized in paragraph 1.1^7 and chapter 2 of annex 21
1.17 the “prosecutor” proves he is schizophrenic invoking article 314 paragraph 1 letter b from
the Romanian Penal Procedure Code which refers to the accused no suspects which I had the falsified
quality of, and again lying that I committed the felony of Judiciary outrage which is an aggravation
circumstance as I proven in paragraph 1.16^4.1 and others, and again after just admitting I’m innocent
as I’ve proven in paragraph 1.16^5 above, and again by declaring a suspect committed a crime, and
again because no deed that can constitute a crime exists in the falsified penal dossiers 2417/P/2014 nor
was I even prosecuted falsely or not for a crime as proven by the aberrant object of falsified penal
dossier which is Judiciary outrage, and annex 1, annex 2, annex 4 and annex 5
1.18 the “prosecutor” lies I live at my mother’s address to commit state terrorism against me
and my family through illegal home breakings as committed on 17th September 2015, as attempted on
2nd October 2015 (my birthday) as proven by chapter 4 from annex 2 summary, as committed on 11th
December 2015, then on 6th, 10th, 13th, 14th, 27th April 2017 when the mafia using tens of its mafia
soldiers repeatedly broke into my mother’s home who fell ill with Zoster Area from stress and trauma.
ANNEX 6 / ECHR Page 70 of 403

1.19 the “prosecutor” lies I have “no occupation” when evidently I have the occupation of
human rights defender through my activity of denouncing the Romanian “state” mafia’s criminal
activity. That I had no legal job is a different matter caused by the Romanian “state” mafia who
destroyed my 1st career as an informatician as objectivized in chapter IV.1 of annex 23, and in fact I
started a 2nd career eventually by becoming a student of a law faculty to get licensed as a law
practitioner as proven by annex 22, career which the mafia destroyed by the daily arrests just before
Orthodox Easter 2017 forcing me to become a temporary refugee during my law faculty exam session
until I was illegally arrested from my law faculty exams on 27th May 2017, incarcerated in the Focsani
“psychiatric” gulag, tied to an operating table and put into anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days with
daily deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxic injections as objectivized in section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC
penal complaint, respectively chapter IV.2 of annex 23

In conclusion the documents contained in this annex are all falsified constituting instigation and
implicitly complicity to wrongful political repression through the perpetration of Crimes against
humanity as the Romanian “state” mafia incrementally assured itself public opinion is dead in Romania
and nobody would be outrages as nobody was for the fact I was illegally deprived of liberty, Tortured,
Bodily Harmed and that Qualified Murder has been attempted against me continuously between 27th
May 2017 and 8th June 2017 by being put in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days through deadly
fluorine and chlorine injections without treatment, then after I survived forced to take other deadly
fluorine and chlorine deadly neurotoxins as objectivized in annex 21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC
penal complaint. These documents are also null because all the falsified acts of procedure in the falsified
penal dossier 2417/P/2014 are null for being started off from a falsified dossier as I’ve proven in
paragraphs chapter 2 from annex 1 summary, according to articled 280-282 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code
ANNEX 6 / ECHR Page 71 of 403

Annex 6 inventory, summary demonstration of falsification, indicates full demonstration,

1. 6 page, the falsified “prosecutor’s” ordnance from 10th December 2015 of renunciation of penal
pursuit in falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, particularly section I.B.18 and preliminary section 18

Summary demonstration of the falsification of these documents is as follows:


All juridical acts under the rule of law are only valid if they are a syllogistical inference from a
particular factual premise correlated with an universal law premise. Because all these documents lack
either the factual premise or is falsified, or break the law premise, they are all falsified. In penal matters
the judge must motivate in fact and by right according to article 403 paragraph 1 letters c and d, and the
prosecutor according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code

1. “Prosecutor’s” ordnance of renunciation of penal pursuit in falsified penal dossier


2417/P/2014 is falsified because:
1.1. according to article 275 paragraph 2 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code only the
accused can be obligated to pay judiciary expenses, and I had the falsified quality of suspect in the
falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014. Article 275 is unconstitutional regardless because the suspect and
accused are innocent according to article 23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution, and articles
4 and 99 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1.2. see paragraph 1.2 from annex 2 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
1.3. see chapter 2 from annex 1 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
1.4. see paragraphs 2.7 from annex 2 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
1.5. “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul as instigated by “judge” Dita Mirela lied using quotes even, that I
declared that “judge” Dita Mirela, mot-a-mot: “... damaged person , Dita Mirela ... sustained ... that
Raneti Tudor Andrei ... threatened ... ‘her to be put to the wall and shot’ ...” which constitutes the
felonies of False declarations and Inducing the judiciary bodies into error committed by “judge” Dita
Mirela, and felonies of service abuse, falsification of documents, corruption, against the liberty of the
person, other felonies and instigation to Crimes against humanity be committed against me as proven
by the fact I opened penal dossiers against “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul as instigated by “judge” Dita and
they were never acquitted, respectively I was never accused of the felonies of False declarations,
Inducing the judiciary bodies into error with false proofs or Disseminating false informations by
publishing the penal dossiers I made against the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes. The instigation to
Crimes against humanity is proven through chapter 2 of annex 2 summary, corroborated with the fact
this falsified ordnance from 10th December 2015 was hidden on 11th December 2015 from the falsified
dossier 14277/231/2015 in 1st instance because it proved I had no passive penal quality from the
moment the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 was closed which is a typical Romanian “state” mafia
mistake because it has no respect for law and logic, and corroborated with the fact that as in the
falsified “prosecutor’s” instigation that Crimes against humanity be committed through
ANNEX 6 / ECHR Page 72 of 403

14277/231/2015 in 1st instance as proven by chapter 1 from annex 5 summary, in this falsified ordnance
it is also hidden the fact I annulled the falsified as proven by chapter 2 from annex 2 summary
“prosecutor’s” instigation that Crimes against humanity be committed through 11224/231/2015 in 1st
instance, as proven in annex 3 summary regarding the solution in 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance,
mention which is obligatory according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter e from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code, fact which was also mentioned in the decision in 14277/231/2015 in 1st instance
1.6 see paragraph 2.3-2.4 from annex 2 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent
acts
1.7 see paragraph 2.2.8 from annex 1 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
1.8 see paragraph 5.2 from annex 1 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
1.9 see paragraph 2.6-2.8 from annex 2 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent
acts
1.10 the “prosecutor” lies by omission hiding the fact he committed state terrorism through
illegal home breaking instigating 4 mafia “masked police” and 2 “policemen” soldiers on 17th September
2015 to arrest and detain me 7 hours from 6 a.m. to harass and subject me to bad treatments as proven
by all chapters of annex 1 summary,
1.10^1 as well as the fact I did not consent to justify the “psychiatry” charlatanry occupation
according to article 184 paragraph 3 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code according to which no
“psychiatric” charlatanry “examination” can take place without my consent because it cannot physically
take place if I do not consent and cooperate, meaning the “prosecutor” tries to induce into error that a
“psychiatric” charlatanry “examination” took place to make it appear that the “psychiatrist” charlatans
did not fake documents on 23rd November 2015 afterwards, and indeed...
1.11 the “prosecutor” lies that the falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry document registered as
970/A1-P/232 was faked on 17th September 2015 when in reality it was faked on 23rd November 2015 as
I proven annex 4, fact which the “prosecutor” also tries to hide by omission
1.12 see paragraph 1.5 from annex 5 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts.
See annex 4 summary regarding the demonstration of the falsification of the “psychiatric” charlatanry
document registered as 970/A1-P/232, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
1.13 the “prosecutor” lies that article 109 from the Romanian Penal Code regarding security
measures applies to me, because security measures are only applicable to convicts according to the text
of the law, not the suspects or accused, reminding I had the falsified quality of suspect of an aggravation
circumstance not a crime in the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 before this falsified ordnance from
10th December 2015 of renunciation of penal pursuit, and afterwards I had no penal quality. See
paragraph 3.26.32 from annex 4 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts - I’m not a
convict therefore article 109 from the Romanian Penal Code doesn’t apply to me
1.14 the criminal schizophrenic “prosecutor” as typical distances himself from his crimes using
an impersonal expression that “it was solicited” that Crimes against humanity be committed against
me, as if the criminal schizophrenic “prosecutor” was an observer not the instigator and falsifier of all
acts of procedure in the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014, instead of using the correct expression “I
solicited”. The criminal schizophrenic “prosecutor” also attempts to reinforce his lie that I’m a convict
not a suspect in his falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 by affirming schizophrenically meaning
contradicting himself that “the suspect Raneti Tudor Andrei ... being registered ... in penal dossier
ANNEX 6 / ECHR Page 73 of 403

14277/231/2015”, when in reality only an accused can be indicted and convicted and appear in a
courthouse penal dossier as a defendant, and when in fact only the proposal or instigation that Crimes
against humanity be committed against me is registered in 14277/231/2015 in which it was annulled as
inadmissible then unfounded as obviously is, and I was never indicted, convicted or diagnosed with
anything ever as proven by annex 17, annex 18, annex 19 and annex 22 regarding my empty judicial
history, other declarations of the mafia “judiciary bodies” who admit I was never indicted and convicted,
respectively proof that I’m still army incorporable, apt for superior studies as certified by the family
doctor, fact corroborated with the 4 legal work medicine certificates invoked through annex 20 attesting
I’m mentally sane and apt for work with superior studies as correspondent to the 4 years I worked
legally as an IT programmer
1.15 the “prosecutor” lied that I wasn’t heard on 17th September 2015 because I refused to give
declarations. In reality because on 17th September 2015 “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul refused to give me a
piece of paper to write my declarations, I declared verbally to prosecutor” Mihaila Paul demonstrating
his felonies he committed through the falsification of all acts of procedure in 2417/P/2014 and this
penal dossier itself, and as proof I had to make a written mention of the falsification of all acts of
procedure in 2417/P/2014 on the bottom of the page on which I signed I was informed of my rights as a
suspect, the page supposedly containing all my rights which was irrelevant since they weren’t respected
1.16 see paragraph 2.7^3.1 from annex 2 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent
acts. The schizophrenic “prosecutor” attempted to correct himself after judicially aberrating by declaring
the aggravation circumstance of Judiciary outrage the object of the falsified dossier 2417/P/2014 as
expected from an occupationally dysfunctional schizophrenic, by mentioning the felony of Threatening is
the crime for which Judiciary outrage is an aggravation circumstance of.
1.16^1 As factual proof , the schizophrenic “prosecutor” made this correction and mention for
the first time in all the falsified acts of procedure in the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 as
demonstrated by annex 1, annex 2, annex 4 and annex 5, only after he read my pleads through which I
annulled his falsified acts of procedure, correction which is worthless since the in rem and in personam
ordnances falsified by the prosecutor demonstrate there was never a prosecution for the felony of
Threatening because no such deed exist, which constitutes proof of tacit admissal by the “prosecutor”
no such deed exists, and the declarations, proofs and all acts of procedure from 2417/P/2014 are all
falsified.
1.16^2 As legal proof, a prosecutor cannot dispose the renunciation of penal pursuit against a
suspect or accused declaring they are convicts, as demonstrated by the fact article 318 from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code was declared unconstitutional soon after in the next year, and the
schizophrenic “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul never attempted to open again the falsified penal dossier
2417/P/2014, put into motion the penal action, indict me and send the dossier at the courthouse for a
falsified conviction which I suspect it wouldn’t have happened because it never happened in all the 4
falsified penal dossiers against me as proven by annex 17 regarding my empty judicial history, which is
why the “prosecutor” never attempted it corroborated with the fact it was never his intention to even
falsely convict me, but just fake the pretext and cover-up story and instigate that Crimes against
humanity be committed against me for the purpose of stopping me from investigating, discovering and
denouncing the Romanian “state” mafia Crimes against humanity against me and others, as I did as
proven by section I.A. of my ICC penal complaint.
ANNEX 6 / ECHR Page 74 of 403

1.16^3 The “prosecutor” lies that “I have limited possibility of understanding the consequences
of the felony committed”,
1.16^3.1 because no deed exists in the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 that can constitute a
felony,
1.16^3.2 because the object of the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 is not a felony but the
aggravation circumstance of Judiciary outrage which cannot possibly exist,
1.16^3.3 because the falsified quality of suspect means I’m believed not proven to have
committed a felony which can only be legally proven through a definitive courthouse decision according
to article 23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution regarding the presumption of innocence
1.16^3.4 because I as demonstrated through my pleads have far superior possibility of
understanding the law and juridical logic as opposed to the schizophrenic “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul and
“judge” Dita Mirela who evidently are retarded criminal sociopaths since they have not only gained
nothing from committing Crimes against humanity against me but have aided my investigation,
discovery and denunciation of the Romanian “state” mafia by their stupidity
1.16^3.5 because even the falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry document attached as annex 4
presents a presumptive falsified diagnostic which by definition is subjective and cannot constitute proof,
besides being illegal, groundless, self-contradictory and syllogistically invalid as demonstrated in annex 4
1.16^4 the “prosecutor” demonstrates he is schizophrenic again retaining that the mode and
means of committing the felony being the “content of the correspondence sent by this one to the
judiciary bodies, in electronic format, is accessible to a limited number of persons” means there’s no
public interest in the penal pursuit of the felony, because
1.16^4.1 “content of the correspondence sent to the judiciary bodies, in electronic format”
means that I addressed petitions to the judicial bodies through which the schizophrenic “prosecutor”
Mihaila Paul and “judge” Dita Mirela declared aberrantly I committed the aggravation circumstance of
Judiciary outrage which is not a crime just because I filed penal and disciplinary complaints, and sued
them which is of course is not a crime and aberrant and as to be expected of occupationally
dysfunctional schizophrenics, as retained in dossier 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance through which I
annulled their falsified documents instigating that Crimes against humanity be committed against me.
Furthermore the state terrorism committed through illegal home breaking on 17th September 2015
coincides with the period right after I lodged a penal complaint against the schizophrenic “prosecutor”
Mihaila Paul and “judge” Dita Mirela for falsifying penal dossier 2417/P/2014
1.16^4.2 “is accessible to a limited number of persons” meaning that the aggravation
circumstance of Judiciary outrage of only the schizophrenic “judge” Dita Mirela complained although
I’ve lodged penal and disciplinary complaints, and sued tens of mafia “magistrates” from the counties of
Vrancea, Galati and the capital city Bucharest at least, is not of public interest because “is accessible to a
limited number of persons” which is a contradiction as aforementioned that not only I investigated,
discovered and denounced a wide number of mafia “magistrate” caporegimes, statistically in fact 100%
of all mafia “magistrate” caporegimes with which I interacted demanding my rights by which I’ve proven
all the “magistrates” in Romania are corrupt respectively about 86% are criminal, but I published their
penal dossiers on the forum militia.freeforums.net and referenced them on facebook.com for years
where they were accessible by an unlimited number of persons being public, until the mafia illegally
censored them simultaneously during the almost daily arrests before Orthodox Easter 2017 when the
ANNEX 6 / ECHR Page 75 of 403

mafia planned to commit Crimes against humanity on Orthodox Easter 2017 in typical “communist”
mafia fashion who targets to commit crimes especially on significant days, such as falsifying the
decisions in 11224/231/2015 and 12718/231/2017 that Crimes against humanity be committed against
me within 1-2 days of my birthday, and harassing me during Christmas, the winter holydays and during
Orthodox Easter 2016 with the falsified actions in dossier 14277/231/2015. This also proves I have the
ability to investigate, discover and denounce any of the Romanian “state” mafia, which I do, and this is
the concern of the mafia for which it committed 1 Qualified Murder attempt, 2 Crimes against
humanity committals and 5 Crimes against humanity attempts, to stop me from denouncing its criminal
activity, and this the mafia members declared the “public interest”
1.16^4.3 that the mafia members feeling threatened by the fact my investigation, discovery and
denouncement of their criminal activity leading to possible conviction for them, is not a felony but is of
public interest and the activity of real policemen, prosecutors and judges, none of which exist in
Romanian as proven by the fact I am the only one investigating and denouncing the Romanian “state”
mafia in its entirety and especially the criminal activity of the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes - because
is the easiest to target because their work attributions are very clearly defined in the law and the mafia
imbeciles send me almost all the document proofs I need ironically being about the only law they
seldom uphold when they shouldn’t, proving they are occupationally dysfunctional schizophrenics even
as mafia members, which instead catalogues them immediately as sociopaths for being organized crime
members
1.16^5 the “prosecutor” admits he didn’t put into motion the penal action and did not create
and indictment with which he is obligated to notify the courthouse that I be judged guilty or innocent,
meaning the “prosecutor” admits I’m innocent according to articles 4 and 99 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code, article 23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution, articles 11 and 20 from
Romanian Constitution that makes Romanian ratified international treaties internal right meaning article
11 from the Universal declaration of human rights and article 6 paragraph 2 from the European
convention of human rights, therefore the “prosecutor” admits he instigated that Crimes against
humanity be committed against an innocent in 11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015 since this was
always the mafia’s motive as objectivized in paragraph 1.1^7 and chapter 2 of annex 21
1.17 the “prosecutor” proves he is schizophrenic invoking article 314 paragraph 1 letter b from
the Romanian Penal Procedure Code which refers to the accused no suspects which I had the falsified
quality of, and again lying that I committed the felony of Judiciary outrage which is an aggravation
circumstance as I proven in paragraph 1.16^4.1 and others, and again after just admitting I’m innocent
as I’ve proven in paragraph 1.16^5 above, and again by declaring a suspect committed a crime, and
again because no deed that can constitute a crime exists in the falsified penal dossiers 2417/P/2014 nor
was I even prosecuted falsely or not for a crime as proven by the aberrant object of falsified penal
dossier which is Judiciary outrage, and annex 1, annex 2, annex 4 and annex 5
1.18 the “prosecutor” lies I live at my mother’s address to commit state terrorism against me
and my family through illegal home breakings as committed on 17th September 2015, as attempted on
2nd October 2015 (my birthday) as proven by chapter 4 from annex 2 summary, as committed on 11th
December 2015, then on 6th, 10th, 13th, 14th, 27th April 2017 when the mafia using tens of its mafia
soldiers repeatedly broke into my mother’s home who fell ill with Zoster Area from stress and trauma.
ANNEX 6 / ECHR Page 76 of 403

1.19 the “prosecutor” lies I have “no occupation” when evidently I have the occupation of
human rights defender through my activity of denouncing the Romanian “state” mafia’s criminal
activity. That I had no legal job is a different matter caused by the Romanian “state” mafia who
destroyed my 1st career as an informatician as objectivized in chapter IV.1 of annex 23, and in fact I
started a 2nd career eventually by becoming a student of a law faculty to get licensed as a law
practitioner as proven by annex 22, career which the mafia destroyed by the daily arrests just before
Orthodox Easter 2017 forcing me to become a temporary refugee during my law faculty exam session
until I was illegally arrested from my law faculty exams on 27th May 2017, incarcerated in the Focsani
“psychiatric” gulag, tied to an operating table and put into anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days with
daily deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxic injections as objectivized in section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC
penal complaint, respectively chapter IV.2 of annex 23

In conclusion the documents contained in this annex are all falsified constituting instigation and
implicitly complicity to wrongful political repression through the perpetration of Crimes against
humanity as the Romanian “state” mafia incrementally assured itself public opinion is dead in Romania
and nobody would be outrages as nobody was for the fact I was illegally deprived of liberty, Tortured,
Bodily Harmed and that Qualified Murder has been attempted against me continuously between 27th
May 2017 and 8th June 2017 by being put in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days through deadly
fluorine and chlorine injections without treatment, then after I survived forced to take other deadly
fluorine and chlorine deadly neurotoxins as objectivized in annex 21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC
penal complaint. These documents are also null because all the falsified acts of procedure in the falsified
penal dossier 2417/P/2014 are null for being started off from a falsified dossier as I’ve proven in
paragraphs chapter 2 from annex 1 summary, according to articled 280-282 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code
ANNEX 6 / ECHR Page 77 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 6 / ECHR Page 78 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 6 / ECHR Page 79 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 6 / ECHR Page 80 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 6 / ECHR Page 81 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 6 / ECHR Page 82 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 7 / ECHR Page 83 of 403

Annex 7 inventory, summary demonstration of falsification, indicates full demonstration,

1. 4 page, a falsified appeal of “prosecutor” Dogaru Luminita Georgeta without active quality in
2417/P/2014, instigating that Crimes against humanity be committed against me as between
27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, based on the “psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise” falsified in
my absence and without my consent on 23rd November 2015, “prosecutor” who hides breaking
the law the fact the previous other “prosecutor’s” falsified ordnance and “psychiatric”
charlatanry falsified recommendation, instigations that Crimes against humanity be committed
against me, were annulled in 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance, therefore all the falsified motives
in these falsified ordnance and “psychiatry” charlatanry “expertise” were already annulled thus
declared inadmissible in 14277/231/2015 in 1st instance. “prosecutor” Dogaru Luminita
Georgeta’s appeal was declared unfounded, and for lack of time I won’t seethe through their
schizophrenic garbage “motivation” proving it beyond sufficient - see annex 10. The falsified
motivation lodged on 12th April 2016, was invented by two more “prosecutors” who always have
instigated for the cover-up or committal of Crimes against humanity against me, namely
Batranu Iuliana and Dragovici Anca-Dorina, as I demonstrate in my ICC penal complaint,
regarding their criminal activity in dossiers 14277/231/2015 and 11224/231/2015 respectively
2. 1 page, unmotivated initial falsified appeal of “prosecutor” Dogaru Luminita Georgeta from 9th
February 2016

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, particularly section I.B.17 and preliminary section 17

Summary demonstration of the falsification of these documents is as follows:


All juridical acts under the rule of law are only valid if they are a syllogistical inference from a
particular factual premise correlated with an universal law premise. Because all these documents lack
either the factual premise or is falsified, or break the law premise, they are all falsified. In penal matters
the judge must motivate in fact and by right according to article 403 paragraph 1 letters c and d, and the
prosecutor according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code

In conclusion the documents contained in this annex are all falsified constituting instigation and
implicitly complicity to wrongful political repression through the perpetration of Crimes against
humanity as the Romanian “state” mafia incrementally assured itself public opinion is dead in Romania
and nobody would be outrages as nobody was for the fact I was illegally deprived of liberty, Tortured,
Bodily Harmed and that Qualified Murder has been attempted against me continuously between 27th
May 2017 and 8th June 2017 by being put in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days through deadly
fluorine and chlorine injections without treatment, then after I survived forced to take other deadly
fluorine and chlorine deadly neurotoxins as objectivized in annex 21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC
penal complaint. These documents are also null because all the falsified acts of procedure in the falsified
penal dossier 2417/P/2014 are null for being started off from a falsified dossier as I’ve proven in chapter
2 from annex 1 summary, according to articled 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
ANNEX 7 / ECHR Page 84 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 7 / ECHR Page 85 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 7 / ECHR Page 86 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 7 / ECHR Page 87 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 7 / ECHR Page 88 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 8 / ECHR Page 89 of 403

Annex 8 inventory, summary demonstration of falsification, indicates full demonstration,

1. falsified closing document from 18th May 2016 from 2220/91/2016, when “prosecutor” Dogaru
Luminita Georgeta who falsified the appeal in 14277/231/2015, in cahoots with “judge” Paun
Ionel iulian who for falsifying decisions of cover up, illegally obtained my complaints against the
“prosecutor’s” falsified acts of procedure in 2417/P/2014, dossiers 2220/91/2015 and
1560/231/2016, and at the same time falsified 2845/P/2016 penal dossier against me which is a
pretext for instigating to Crimes against humanity against me as proven

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, particularly section I.B.16 and preliminary section 16

Summary demonstration of the falsification of these documents is as follows:


All juridical acts under the rule of law are only valid if they are a syllogistical inference from a
particular factual premise correlated with an universal law premise. Because all these documents lack
either the factual premise or is falsified, or break the law premise, they are all falsified. In penal matters
the judge must motivate in fact and by right according to article 403 paragraph 1 letters c and d, and the
prosecutor according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code

1. Closing document from 18th May 2016 from 2220/91/2016 is falsified because:
1.1. “judge” Paun Ionel Iulian was incompatible because he falsified before the decision in
13761/231/2015 and as well a lot of responses to my requests for information for which I opened penal
dossiers against “judge” Paun Ionel Iulian in which he was never acquitted, which automatically attracts
his incompatibility according to article 64 paragraph 1 letter f from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code,
and all his subsequent acts are null according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure
Code. The relevance of the demonstration of the falsification of the acts of procedure in dossiers
2220/91/2016 and 1560/231/2015, is that “judge” Paun Ionel Iulian attempts to cover-up the Crimes
against humanity from the falsified dossier 2417/P/2014 which makes him an accomplice, and at the
same time instigates to Crimes against humanity by falsifying penal dossier 2845/P/2016 against me
1.2. “judge” Paun Ionel Iulian lies my request for his removal according to article 64 paragraph 1
letter f from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code incompatibility was judged before, therefore he
infringes on the principle nemo esse iudex in sua causa potest according to article 11 from Government
Ordnance 27/2002, addressing the request for his own removal and illegally rejecting it, attracting the
nullity of al subsequent acts of procedure according to article 280-282 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code. The demonstration is very simple - according to the principle actor incumbit probatio,
“judge” Paun Ionel Iulian must prove my request for his removal was judged before and he didn’t
because he lies and cannot prove otherwise, and must prove that my request for his removal is the
same as the one judged before, and must prove that the judging occurred and not the falsification of a
decision which the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes almost always do in general, and always do in my
dossiers, therefore no request of “judge” Paun Ionel Iulian could’ve even have been possibly judged
before, especially because as a perfect and infinitely inalienable argument in my requests of removal of
ANNEX 8 / ECHR Page 90 of 403

the mafia “magistrates” from my dossiers, I always accused them for not denouncing the other mafia
“magistrates” who falsified the decisions of rejection of my requests of removal unmotivated - because I
know the mafia “magistrates” never do and never can justify breaking the law since it’s impossible,
which is proof of the mafia “magistrates” constituting an organized crime group actually, therefore no
matter how many times the mafia “magistrates” falsified decisions against my requests of removal, this
extra argument of omission to denounce which is a felony according to article 267 from the Romanian
Penal Code, always kept my requests for removal impossible to be dismissed as “judge” Paun Ionel Iulian
lied. Often though my requests are actually not even rejected through falsified decisions before the
mafia “magistrates” lie, which is convoluted and lengthy to prove and verify, reason for which I consider
previous general demonstration sufficient for lack of time, and will only complete my demonstrations as
necessary.
1.3. “judge” Paun Ionel Iulian proves he is schizophrenic by displaying perfect logical
incoherence and occupational dysfunction according to DSM-V “psychiatric” charlatanry manual of
diagnosis and statistics, declaring he suspends the cause because according to the law, article 72
paragraph 8 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code the introduction of a request for the cause’s
moving to another instance does not suspend the cause
1.4. “judge” Paun Ionel Iulian proves he is schizophrenic by hallucinating that “a man of
masculine sex (mafia troglodyte peasant pleonastic speech) that had inserted some earphones in both
ears, these being connected to some electronic devices out of sight, respectively mobile phone and
tablet, of nature to disturb the quietness, to the amazement of the parties around that person”, because
listening to audio books on earphones is physically impossible to “disturb the quietness”, as proven by
the fact no witness testified to this, nor the accusers, objectively corroborated with the fact I was doing
the same thing in the same courthouse meeting for an hour and a half between 9:00 a.m. and 10:30
a.m. without disturbing anyone, as I’ve did in other courthouse meetings before and after without being
accused of anything if the accusations are not ridiculous enough by themselves. This is how the
schizophrenic mafia “magistrate” caporegimes Paun Ionel Iulian and Dogaru Luminita Georgeta falsified
penal dossier 2845/P/2016 and instigated or determined according to the text of the law the Crimes
against humanity committed against me between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, and finally that I be
indefinitely to life incarcerated, tortured and murdered through 12718/231/2017, for the crimes and
diagnosis of another person named Vasilache Daniel because I was never indicted, convicted or
diagnosed as I objectivized in section I.B.3 from my ICC penal complaint, and for the annulled
“psychiatric” charlatanry documents from dossier 14277/231/2014 which are obviously related with the
falsified dossier 2417/P/2014 not with the falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and
4329/P/2016, as short proof, as I’ve demonstrated anyway in section I.B.2 from my ICC penal complaint
1.5. “judge” Paun Ionel Iulian proves he is schizophrenic by hallucinating that “for establishing
what activities that person undertakes (possibly audio/video recordings), the president of the judgment
contingent called two gendarmes”, first because audio/video recordings have nothing to do with the
previous schizophrenic accusation of disturbing the quietness by listening to audio books on earphones,
secondly because listening to audio books on earphones has nothing to do with audio/video recordings,
third because video recordings can’t be performed with ~“electronic devices out of sight” as the
schizophrenic accusers admit and fourth because I knew the courthouse meeting is recorded
audio/video by default nor only I had no intent to audio/video record the courthouse meeting which by
ANNEX 8 / ECHR Page 91 of 403

the way is not a felony, but the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes offer me all the proofs I need against
the Romanian “state” mafia through documents under their signature, and in fact I requested after this
frame-up the audio/video recording and obtained the audio recording with which I proven my
innocence, proof of course the mafia “judiciary bodies” refused to administer which is also proof in itself
of the conspiracy to falsify acts of procedure leading to the Crimes against humanity committed against
me between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017. In reality the schizophrenic “judge” Paun Ionel Iulian
called the mafia “gendarmes” soldiers to detain me in the courthouse while he attempted the frame-up
provoking me to commit a felony as I’ve witnessed that the mafia “judges” are doing against the parties
they disfavor during trial, because as soon as the schizophrenic “judge” Paun Ione Iulian told me
something like ~“either remove your earphones or leave the courthouse room” I intended to leave and
was blocked by the mafia “gendarme” soldier named Butuc who positioned himself in front of the exit
door and was keeping in shut with his hands behind his back that I couldn’t go around him or open the
door without touching him, point at which I brought to his attention he was committing the felony of
Illegal deprivation of liberty. According to DSM-V “psychiatric” charlatanry manual of diagnosis and
statistics, logical incoherence and occupational dysfunction proves the existence of schizophrenia
1.6. “judge” Paun Ionel Iulian proves he is schizophrenic lying that “he refused to show to what
devices were the earphones connected to, showing just a mobile phone”, because the first contradiction
is that obviously the schizophrenic accusers admit I didn’t refuse anything since I shown the earphones
were connected to the mobile phone, then the second contradiction is that a pair of earphones cannot
be connected to more than one device, then the third contradiction is that earphones are not
audio/video recording devices and ad absurdum if recording audio/video I wouldn’t have worn anything
that can be identified as an audio/video recording audio devices about which I already proven I have no
need since the Romanian “state” mafia delivers proofs of its crimes to me by post and email, or by
refusing to do so when legally required and so on and so forth.
1.7. “judge” Paun Ionel Iulian proves he is schizophrenic hallucinating that ~“he began making
accuses and addressed obscene words to the judge and gendarmes which he accused of illegally
depriving him of liberty”, because as accusers they admit they haven’t seen the obscene gestures or
heard the obscene words they accuse me, in reality attempting to match all hypostases of the text of the
felony of Disturbing the solemnity of the courthouse meeting, text with which they accused me instead
of facts.
1.8. “judge” Paun Ionel Iulian lie that “the accusations, the obscene gestures and words(even if
partially heard by the president of the judgment contingent (who is schizophrenic and paranoid since no
witness confirmed his generic accusations typical to liars proving he heard nothing because there was
nothing to hear, I’m not a stupid mafia peasant to get provoked into committing felonies for the mafia
to blackmail me with as they do amongst each other)) were of nature to start accesses of hilarity in the
back of the courthouse room where the commentaries were heard integrally (where parties and lawyers
were both found)(but nobody testified, not even the mafia instigated three witnesses who refused to
denounce the frame-up instead because all 3 were public servants, including Crintea Valerica who is a
Ministry of interior mafia “special agent”, proving the accusations against me are lies too as I proven
objectively by the audio recording of the courthouse the mafia “judiciary bodies” refused to administer
as further proof, against which the mafia witnesses would’ve been futile to lie) as well as rumor and
scandal between the participants in trial (lie), that determined the passing into trivia the courthouse
ANNEX 8 / ECHR Page 92 of 403

meeting, contributing thus to the felony of Disturbing the solemnity of the meeting (which the
schizophrenic “judge” Paun Ionel Iulian committed all by itself by making a circus attempting with the
help of the mafia “gendarmes” soldiers to provoke me, and failed lamentably demonstrating himself a
felon for which I opened a penal dossier against him right after, in which he was never acquitted, penal
dossier who grew as I investigated the mafia to 71 accused that I found involved in the conspiracy of
Crimes against humanity cover-up operation around the falsification of dossier 2845/P/2016 alone,
meaning all chief prosecutors from the general prosecutor’s office and other prosecutor’s offices
hierarchically responsible, several ministers of justice and supreme court presidents responsible as
disciplinary action titularies against the criminal “prosecutors”, chief of judiciary inspection, leadership
of the Supreme Council of Magistrates and a lot of “judges” and other subordinate “prosecutor”
caporegimes in role of instigators or accomplices, the minister of interior responsible for the mafia
soldiers starting with the generals of “police” and “gendarmes” also responsible for initiating disciplinary
action and pursuing penal action against their criminal subordinates, control cabinets of these ministries
and institutions regarding the mafia’s soldiers, and mafia associated “lawyers”, “psychiatrist” charlatans,
registrars etc.)
1.9 “judge” Paun Ionel Iulian lied that the above paragraphs demonstrated that I committed the
felony of Disturbing the solemnity of the meeting for which I am not indicted and convicted as proof to
this day, proven by annex 17
1.10 “prosecutor” Dogaru Luminita Georgeta declared he started the penal pursuit, through
which he went beyond complicity, instigating or determining that Crimes against humanity be
committed against me, as he attempted to instigate through the falsified appeal in 14277/231/2015
which he lost as unfounded proving he falsified it, according to annex 10, and as I’ve objectivized in
sections I.A.II. 1.3.1^6 and I.A.II. 1.3.1^7 respectively
1.11 “judge” Paun Ionel Iulian continue to demonstrate he’s schizophrenic by declaring that the
felony of Disturbing the solemnity of the meeting was also committed against the “gendarme” mafia
soldiers he called and proven he had an understanding before the committal of the failed attempt to
provoke me and the failed frame-up, by the fact I was sequestered in the courthouse room even after
the “judge” Paun Ionel Iulian being schizophrenic uttered the invitation to leave the courthouse room,
harassing me in actuality with irrational behavior evidently. Strangely the mafia soldiers did not
contribute in any way to the schizophrenic accusation except through other schizophrenic or unrelated
accusations against me such as the aberration that I was arrogant for going to another courthouse
meeting when I was called by another gendarme at the order of another judge because I had in trial
another complaint against the prosecutor’s falsified acts of procedure, aberration uttered by the
Ministry of interior “special agent” Crintea Valerica, while the schizophrenic “gendarme” Lepadatu
contradicted himself between his witness deposition and his own report unrelated with the
schizophrenic accusations against me, and the other schizophrenic “gendarme” Butuc made other
unrelated and generic accusations against me typical to liars, all false depositions by which I simply
demonstrate my innocence through the proven fact there proofs were never administered and
objectivized, and never referenced in the falsified acts of procedure which although the “judicial bodies”
refused to communicate in copy as legally required and as I requested, to prevent me from using them
as proof against them, the falsified ordnance from 1st August 2017 from 2845/P/2016 (connected with
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016) proves through the lack of an indictment or any reference no proof
ANNEX 8 / ECHR Page 93 of 403

whatsoever was administered let alone objectivized, as I’ve demonstrated in my ICC penal complaint
section I.B.4, where I thoroughly also demonstrated the fallacy of the schizophrenic accusations against
me, proving the falsified penal dossiers against me were nothing more than a pretexts to instigate
Crimes against humanity be committed against me in which as ultimate proof they degenerated
between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 as I’ve predicted since 2015 and pleaded for help with the
“authorities” from Romanian, EU and CoE for nothing proving instead the extend of the organized crime,
situation which culminated with the final solution Crimes against humanity attempt to indefinitely to
life incarcerate, torture and murder me as I’ve objectivized in annex 21, which determined me to
become a permanent refugee, as I’ve objectivized in sections I.B.2-I.B.4, I.A.II. 1.3.1^7 and I.A.II. 1.3.1^8
respectively from my ICC penal complaint

In conclusion the document contained in this annex is falsified constituting instigation and
implicitly complicity to wrongful political repression through the perpetration of Crimes against
humanity as the Romanian “state” mafia incrementally assured itself public opinion is dead in Romania
and nobody would be outrages as nobody was for the fact I was illegally deprived of liberty, Tortured,
Bodily Harmed and that Qualified Murder has been attempted against me continuously between 27th
May 2017 and 8th June 2017 by being put in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days through deadly
fluorine and chlorine injections without treatment, then after I survived forced to take other deadly
fluorine and chlorine deadly neurotoxins as objectivized in annex 21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC
penal complaint. This document is null and so are all subsequent falsified acts of procedure in the
falsified penal dossier 2845/P/2016 according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure
Code
ANNEX 8 / ECHR Page 94 of 403
ANNEX 8 / ECHR Page 95 of 403
ANNEX 8 / ECHR Page 96 of 403
ANNEX 8 / ECHR Page 97 of 403
ANNEX 9 / ECHR Page 98 of 403

Annex 9 inventory, summary demonstration of falsification, indicates full demonstration,

1. 8 pages, falsified closing document from 24th June 2016 from 14277/231/2015, when “judge”
Popa Mariana incompatible for many reasons, falsified 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 penal
dossier against me after harassing me for hours to provoke me as I was on 18th May 2016, which
is a pretext for instigating to Crimes against humanity against me as proven
2. 8 pages, falsified refusals of “judge” Popa Mariana to communicate the audio recording of the
tribunal meeting from 24th June 2016 from 14277/231/2015

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, particularly section I.B.15 and preliminary section 15

Summary demonstration of the falsification of these documents is as follows:


All juridical acts under the rule of law are only valid if they are a syllogistical inference from a
particular factual premise correlated with an universal law premise. Because all these documents lack
either the factual premise or is falsified, or break the law premise, they are all falsified. In penal matters
the judge must motivate in fact and by right according to article 403 paragraph 1 letters c and d, and the
prosecutor according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code

1. Closing document from 24th June 2016 from 14277/231/2015 is falsified because:
1.1. “judge” Popa Mariana stole dossier 14277/231/2015 from the random distribution of
dossiers without legal forms, after the dossier changed hands with no apparent legal forms 4 times
between 3 judges, and I found it twice at “judge” Popa Mariana who being the chief of the penal section
should’ve notified the Supreme Council of Magistrates and the prosecutor’s office for disciplinary and
penal action against his mafia “colleagues” “judge” Croitoru Sandina Mariana and “judge” Comanescu
Carmen who were committing felonies with dossier 14277/231/2015. “judge” Popa Mariana was very
touchy about the subject of the dossier 14277/231/2015 changing hands 4 times between 3 judges with
no apparent legal forms, which I’ve invoked as a reason for his removal from dossier 14277/231/2015,
moment at which “judge” Popa Mariana threatened me as proven by this annex committing the felonies
of Threatening, Blackmailing, Influencing declarations and others. Obtaining a dossier without legal
forms is breaking the law and regulations makes any judge incompatible according to article 64
paragraph 1 letter f from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code regarding proof of lack of impartiality.
According to article 99 letters l and o from Romanian Law 303/2004 disciplinary sanctions, stealing the
dossier from the random distribution system is also stealing it from another judge and according to the
Romanian Constitutional Court decision from 15th June 2016, a public functionary breaking the law
constitutes the felony of Public service abuse which was already obvious as stated by the text of the
law. Breaking the law attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts effectuated by that “judge” according to
articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1.2. “judge” Popa Mariana refused to send 2 requests of moving the dossier 14277/231/2015 to
another instance, to the superior instance to be judged, and refused to judge all my requests in
ANNEX 9 / ECHR Page 99 of 403

14277/231/2015 which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts falsified by “judge” Popa Mariana
according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1.3. it doesn’t retain the events from 24th June 2016 and as proof same “judge” Popa Mariana
intervened personally and falsified 4 refusals to my 4 administrative requests to Vrancea Tribunal to
communicate the audio recording of the courthouse from 24th June 2016 from 14277/231/2015 that
proves in detail all the falsified aspects of the closing document from 24th June 2016, reminding that I
obtained with the same kind of request the audio recording of the “Judecatoria Focsani” courthouse
from 18th May 2016 which is jurisprudential proof “judge” Popa Mariana as I declared harassed me for
hours to provoke me and after failing falsified anyway 2 judiciary fines and penal dossiers 3992/P/2016
and 4329/P/2016 against me for the same false reasons, that I pleaded in defense of my rights which is
not felony, using juridical terms which are evidently not obscene words as “judge” Popa Mariana lied. As
proof of the intent to falsify the closing document from 24th June 2016, “judge” Popa Mariana being
schizophrenic lied that “I refuse” to plead when I formulated according to the principle of disposition
which dictates I manifest my own will in establishing the juridical regime of my requests and what I
request in a trial, being also legally obligatory to formulate requests of a criminal “judge’s” removal from
the dossier as soon as that is known according to article 66 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code,
meaning it’s not the judge’s prerogative to dictate my juridical actions in a trial, nor is a judge allowed to
disobey the law, requests that I made for “judge” Popa Mariana’s removal from the dossier on account
of him breaking every relevant law which is proof beyond any reasonable doubt of lack of any
impartiality and mental sanity for that matter coming from a judge. “judge” Popa Mariana inclusively
refused to clear the council room due to the legally secret nature of the trial, conversing no less than
with convicts for murder insinuating he would use them against me as false witnesses, and gave the
convicts my personal data and my mother’s apartment’s address as a threat against my security even,
insinuating he would instigate them as the mafia’s “judge” Dita Mirela instigated interloper Herghelegiu
Danut to commit Qualified Murder and Bodily Harm against me in the night between 5th and 6th
December 2015 by violently hitting me violently on the back of the head, hitting my head violently
against the wall, then pushing me violently down a flight of stairs to make it look like an accident.
1.4. "judge" Popa Mariana who was incompatible for other reasons also to be the judge in
dossiers 14277/231/2015 and 1053/91/2016, such as because "judge" Popa Mariana participated before
in this cause, at least in dossier 623/91/2016 who is in relation with both 14277/231/2015 and
1053/91/2016 dossiers, and is thus legally disallowed to participate again in the main cause
14277/231/2015 especially, or dossier 1053/91/2016 through which I attacked her own falsified decision
in 623/91/2016 and her presence in 1053/91/2016 constitutes a flagrant breaking of the principle nemo
esse iudex in sua cause potest, whether she broke the law before or not which she did by falsifying the
decision in 623/91/2016. Consequently all acts of procedure falsified by “judge” Popa Mariana in these
causes are null according to article 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1.5. <for lack of time I’m copy pasting from the ICC penal complaint, following that I number the
paragraphs and reference them instead> the courthouse meeting closing document form 24th June
2016, attached as annex 9 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1
to this ICC penal complaint, is obviously falsified by accusing me that pleading constitutes the felony of
Disturbing the solemnity of the courthouse according to article 278 from Romanian Penal Code,
therefore the "prosecutors" should've ex-officio denounce "judge" Popa Mariana who falsified the
ANNEX 9 / ECHR Page 100 of 403

meeting closing document form 24th June 2016, to the superior prosecutor's office competent to
prosecute magistrates, just like I opened a penal dossier against "judge" Popa Mariana who was never
acquitted as proof, and as corroboration I was never accused of the felonies of False declarations (for
false judicial declarations such as in a false penal complaint), Inducing into error the judicial bodies (for
false proofs) or Disseminating false information (for publishing the penal dossier against "judge" Popa
Mariana, and legally advertising she is a criminal on the internet, as I did against perhaps with over a
hundred penal dossiers on the illicitly mafia censored forum “militia.freeforums.net”), through which I
make the proof of verity of my declarations and proofs, certified by the very Romanian "state" mafia
who has demonstrated every interest in its 8 attempts to Qualifiedly Murdering me, Torturing and
gravely Bodily Harming me in two instances as I've objectivized in section A.II.1.3.1. As analytic proof
the accusation is false, according to the text of the felony of Disturbing the solemnity of the courthosue
meeting, the words used must be insults or obscene, not that the plead in my defense of my rights in
which I demonstrated "judge" Popa Mariana is incompatible for breaking the law by being thus proven
partial, and by implicitly revealing Popa Mariana is not a judge but a felon, fact which "judge" Popa
Mariana admits by falsely accusing me of using insulting words not that my plead is insulting which is
not, as proven by "judge" Popa Mariana failing to specify the insulting or obscene words and accusing
me generically typical to liars that the phrases of my plead in defense of my rights are insulting or
obscene, again with no objectivization as none can be formulated, as proven by annex 9 of my Rule 39
ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal complaint. That I
proved objectively "judge" Popa Mariana has broken the law and is therefore proven to be partial is not
an insult nor an accusation, is the objective truth necessary as the particular factual premise for the legal
request for "judge" Popa Mariana to be removed from dossier 14277/231/2015 according to article 64
paragraph 1 letter f from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code regarding lack of the "magistrate's"
impartiality, given the only warrant of a judge's impartiality is his obligation to obey the law exclusively
according to article 124 paragraph 2 from the Romanian Constitution, legal request for removal that I
formulated for protecting my fundamental right to a fair trial according to article 21 from the Romanian
Constitution, where fair means according to the principle of legality which "judge" Popa Mariana has
broken to begin with, which is the positive proof there is no deed that I uttered insulting or obscene
words, and therefore pleading in my defense of my rights cannot even ad absurdum constitute the
felony of Disturbing the solemnity of the meeting, all the more I pleaded in the same manner before in
front and against many "magistrates" without being falsely accused of Disturbing the solemnity of the
meeting, including in front and against "judge" Popa Mariana who was incompatible for other reasons
also to be the judge in dossiers 14277/231/2015 and 1053/91/2016, such as because "judge" Popa
Mariana participated before in this cause, at least in dossier 623/91/2016 who is in relation with both
14277/231/2015 and 1053/91/2016 dossiers, and is thus legally disallowed to participate again in the
main cause 14277/231/2015 especially, or dossier 1053/91/2016 through which I attacked her own
falsified decision in 623/91/2016 and her presence in 1053/91/2016 constitutes a flagrant breaking of
the principle nemo esse iudex in sua cause potest, whether she broke the law before or not which she
did by falsifying the decision in 623/91/2016, not to mention dossier 14277/231/2015 before remaining
at "judge" Popa Mariana changed hands as a "hot potato" at least 4 times that I observed with no
apparent legal forms between the "judges" at Vrancea Tribunal which constitute a grave infringement of
the principle of the independence of the magistrate and of non-interference with the work of a
ANNEX 9 / ECHR Page 101 of 403

magistrate inherently, and for which "judge" Popa Mariana is responsible as the president of the penal
section, obligated to denounce this to the Superior Magistrate Council for disciplinary action, and to the
prosecutor's office for penal action against her criminal "magistrate" colleagues which "judge" Popa
Mariana protects because she's not a magistrate but a member of the same mafia as the other
"magistrates" she's in cahoots with. The negative proof pleading does not constitute the felony of
Disturbing the solemnity of the courthouse meeting, is the obvious fact anyone who would demonstrate
an accused has committed a felony, would commit the felony of Disturbing the solemnity of the
courthouse meeting by "insulting" the accused regardless whether the plead is true or false, but the text
of the felony refers to insulting or obscene words, not a plead by which a truth is revealed about a
person that may make that person feel injured in its fake or real reputation or in its crooked or honest
ego, finding the truth being the fundamental principle of justice as notoriously depicted in the very
sculpture of the woman representing justice, who has one of her breasts revealed naked which signifies
that uncomfortable and ugly truths will be revealed through justice, even about the judicial bodies
themselves. The principle of finding the truth is not just a roman right derived principle but is engraved
in the Romanian Penal Procedure Code article 97 regarding the proofs and many other such articles in
which the expression as translated in English is: "finding out the truth" from the Romanian "aflarea
adevarului" is to be found, where "finding out the truth” turns out to be the part of conclusion of the
judicial process, preceding the just reparation or in accordance with the truth reparation through an
executory judicial decision that restores the order of right equitably between parties and in society in
general, process which constitutes justice. Finally the proof that I uttered no insulting or obscene words,
is the audio recording of the courthouse which "judge" Popa Mariana refused to communicate falsifying
4 responses to my requests herself, by which "judge" Popa Mariana is withholding evidence because she
harassed me judicially during the proceedings of audience in 14277/231/2015 and 1053/91/2016
attempting to provoke me to utter insulting and obscene words for hours by constantly interrupting me
and through irrational behavior such as even if it was legally required to clear the courthouse room of
other parties in other dossiers, and especially the convict's box of the murderers I was trialed in parallel
with as proof again the "psychiatric" charlatanry procedure as I indicated through article 184 paragraph
1 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, refers although unconstitutionally only to suspects or the
accused of homicide which obviously I am not - see paragraph 1.3 from annex 1 summary, convicts for
homicide to which "judge" Popa Mariana revealed my personal data creating a threatening atmosphere
as she also conversed during the procedures in my trial with these convicts for murder implying to me
that the organized crime "judge" Popa Mariana belongs to can negotiate with these convicts to harm me
or be false witnesses against me, which in fact they were as my mother who I mandated to look in
dossier 12718/231/2017 told me, testimonies who were never brought to my attention and are
therefore inadmissible, although I made the written request that all the proofs in the penal dossiers
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 be communicated to me, testimonies however which do
not contribute to the accusation as all the others as my mother also told me, reason for which they are
not invoked in any of the documents I've managed to obtain as proof, testimonies who as the others
would've been useless if accusing me uttering insulting or obscene words because of the audio
recording of the courthouse, material proof who should've been the first invoked but was avoided by
the Romanian "state" mafia. Finally the obvious false accusations of "judge" Popa Mariana prove that
dossiers 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 based on her false depositions are falsified, which in turn would
ANNEX 9 / ECHR Page 102 of 403

prove any testimony who differs that is false, reason for which I don't even need the audio recording of
the courthouse, which "judge" Popa Mariana refused to communicate illegally to hide her felonies
against me from 24th June 2016 such as the felony of attempting to Influence my declaration to prove
my innocence and inherently the Romanian “state” mafia’s criminal activity, which according to the
presumption of innocence I need not demonstrate like I did above, but I do need to demonstrate my
accusation of the improper or not but punishable regardless instigation or determination of Crimes
against humanity committed against me, which wouldn't have happened without the determining
participation of "judge" Popa Mariana, “judge” Paun Ionel Iulian and “prosecutor” Dogaru Luminita
Georgeta to start with, and all the other mafia members I accuse in this ICC penal complaint, and given
that I proven in section A that the Crimes against humanity committed against me between 27th May
2017 and 8th June 2017 were the Romanian's "state" mafia intention all along as proven by the Crimes
against humanity perpetrated against me in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014, and the
other in between Qualified Murder attempts, 8 in total including the Crimes against humanity
mentioned as I've objectivized in section A.II.1.3.1, demonstration by which I proven beyond any
reasonable doubt that "judge" Popa Mariana knew exactly what would happen by falsifying penal
dossiers 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 against me, all the more aware as I've proven many more were
innocently drugged by the "European" Vrancea county "justice" as I objectivized in paragraphs 1.1^6,
2.4^13.5 and 2.4^20 of annex 21, with which I've also notified Citizen’s Commission on Human Rights
about the "psychiatry" charlatanry atrocities in Romania in general through the email I made available to
other institutions that I’ve also uploaded to the internet address:
https://1drv.ms/b/s!Av_pxCea0UPwkWoBrEVB_efSpXDy
<for lack of time I indicate I will fully demonstrate the instigation of “judge” Popa Mariana to
Crimes against humanity against me in section I.B.15 of my ICC penal complaint>

2. the schizophrenic “judge” Popa Mariana refused 4 times to communicate the audio recording
of the Vrancea Tribunal from 24th June 2016 from 14277/231/2015, withholding evidence of his felonies

In conclusion the document contained in this annex is falsified constituting instigation and
implicitly complicity to wrongful political repression through the perpetration of Crimes against
humanity as the Romanian “state” mafia incrementally assured itself public opinion is dead in Romania
and nobody would be outrages as nobody was for the fact I was illegally deprived of liberty, Tortured,
Bodily Harmed and that Qualified Murder has been attempted against me continuously between 27th
May 2017 and 8th June 2017 by being put in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days through deadly
fluorine and chlorine injections without treatment, then after I survived forced to take other deadly
fluorine and chlorine deadly neurotoxins as objectivized in annex 21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC
penal complaint. This document is null and so are all subsequent falsified acts of procedure in the
falsified penal dossier 2845/P/2016 according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure
Code
ANNEX 9 / ECHR Page 103 of 403
ANNEX 9 / ECHR Page 104 of 403
ANNEX 9 / ECHR Page 105 of 403
ANNEX 9 / ECHR Page 106 of 403
ANNEX 9 / ECHR Page 107 of 403
ANNEX 9 / ECHR Page 108 of 403
ANNEX 9 / ECHR Page 109 of 403
ANNEX 9 / ECHR Page 110 of 403
ANNEX 9 / ECHR Page 111 of 403
ANNEX 9 / ECHR Page 112 of 403

Tudor Raneti

From: Tudor Raneti <tudor.raneti@gmail.com>


Sent: 4 octombrie 2016 03:16
To: 'tr-vrancea@just.ro'
Subject: FW: CERERE #7-2 DE COMUNICARE A INREGISTRARII AUDIO DIN SEDINTA DIN
24.06.2016 DIN 14277/231/2015
Attachments: cerere #7-2 de comunicarea inregistrarii audio video din 24.06.2016.pdf

Tracking
Tracking: Recipient Read

'tr-vrancea@just.ro' Read: 04.10.2016 08:15

Am primit un raspuns falsificat la aceasta cerere, motiv pentru care inculp pe asa‐zisul judecator Matache Daniela pentru 
refuzul tacit de a solutiona aceasta cerere administrativa, demonstrand complicitatea la infractiunile savarsite de asa‐
zisul judecator Popa Mariana pe 24.06.2016 de Falsul in declaratii si Inducerea in eroare a organelor judiciare, 
infractiunile de falsurile in inscrisuri, infractiunile de servicciu, infractiunile contra libertatii persoanei, infractiunile de 
coruptie, Constituirea unui grup infractional organizat si alte infractiuni 
 
Va repun in atentie cererea pentru a o solutiona, urmand sa va inculp din nou pentru refuzul tacit sau explicit dupa caz in 
plangerea penala anexata la prezenta 
 
 
 
From: Tudor Raneti [mailto:tudor.raneti@gmail.com]  
Sent: 24 iunie 2016 23:36 
To: tr‐vrancea@just.ro 
Subject: CERERE #7 DE COMUNICARE A INREGISTRARII AUDIO‐VIDEO DIN SEDINTA DIN 24.06.2016 DIN 14277/231/2015
 
 

1
ANNEX 9 / ECHR Page 113 of 403
ANNEX 9 / ECHR Page 114 of 403
ANNEX
Tribunalul VRANCEA 9 / ECHRdosar
- Informaţii Page 115 of 403 http://portal.just.ro/91/SitePages/Dosar.aspx?id_dosar=23100000000150...

Portal > Tribunalul VRANCEA > Informaţii dosar

Informaţii dosar

Informaţii generale
Părţi
Şedinţe
Căi atac
Citare prin publicitate

Informaţii generale

Nr. unic (nr. format vechi) : 14277/231/2015

Data inregistrarii 14.04.2016

Data ultimei modificari: 26.07.2016

Sectie: Sectia Penala

Materie: Penal

Obiect: obligarea la tratament medical Propunere formulată de Parchetul de pe lângă Tribunalul


Vrancea

Stadiu procesual: Contestație(NCPP)

Părţi

Nume Calitate parte

PARCHETUL DE PE LÂNGĂ JUDECĂTORIA FOCȘANI Contestator

RANETI TUDOR ANDREI Contestator

Şedinţe

07.07.2016

Ora estimata: 9:00


Complet: Fond Penal FP6
Tip solutie: Amână cauza
Solutia pe scurt: În baza disp. art. 68 C.pr.pen. cu ref. la art. 64 alin. 1 lit. f și alin. 3 și 6 C.pr.pen., respinge, ca
nefondată, cererea de recuzare formulată de contestatorul Raneti Tudor Andrei, cu privire la doamna judecător Popa
Mariana, judecătorul desemnat cu soluționarea cauzelor din completul FP5 la data de 24.06.2016. Fără cale de atac.
Soluționată în camera de consiliu și pronunțată în ședință publică, azi, 07.07.2016.
Document: Încheiere – recuzare 07.07.2016

07.07.2016

Ora estimata: 9:00


Complet: Fond Penal FP5
Tip solutie:
Solutia pe scurt: Respinge, ca inadmisibile, cererile formulate de contestatorul Raneti Tudor Andrei de sesizare a
Curții Constituționale cu excepțiile de neconstituționalitate a disp. art. 318 alin. 2 Cod procedura penala si ale

1 of 3 17.10.2016 17:30
ANNEX
Tribunalul VRANCEA 9 / ECHRdosar
- Informaţii Page 116 of 403 http://portal.just.ro/91/SitePages/Dosar.aspx?id_dosar=23100000000150...

dispozițiilor art. 245, art. 246, art. 247 si art. 248 Cod procedura penala. Respinge ca nefondate, atât contestația
declarata de Parchetul de pe lingă Judecătoria Focșani cat si pe cea formulata de contestatorul Raneti Tudor Andrei
împotriva Încheierii pronunțata de Judecătoria Focșani la data de 05.02.2016. Conform art. 275 alin. 2 Cod procedura
penala, obliga pe contestatorul Raneti Tudor Andrei sa plătească statului suma de 300 lei, cu titlu de cheltuieli
judiciare. Onorariul pentru aparatorul desemnat din oficiu pentru contestator in suma de 130 lei, se va suporta din
fondurile Ministerului Justiției. Cu drept de contestatie in termen de 48 ore de la pronunțare, doar in ce privește
cererea de sesizare a Curții Constituționale. Definitiva. Pronunțată în Camera de Consiliu azi, 07.07.2016.
Document: Încheiere finală (dezinvestire) 07.07.2016

24.06.2016

Ora estimata: 9:00


Complet: Fond Penal FP6
Tip solutie: Amână cauza
Solutia pe scurt: În baza disp. art. 68 C.pr.pen., respinge ca nefondată cererea de recuzare a d-nei judecător Mariana
Popa, formulată de contestatorul Raneti Tudor Andrei, . Fără cale de atac. Soluționată în camera de consiliu și
pronunțată în ședință publică, azi, 24.06.2016.
Document: Încheiere – recuzare 24.06.2016

24.06.2016

Ora estimata: 9:00


Complet: Fond Penal FP5
Tip solutie: Amână pronunțarea
Solutia pe scurt: Stabilește pronunțarea la data de 07.07.2016
Document: Încheiere de ședință 24.06.2016

21.06.2016

Ora estimata: 9:00


Complet: Fond Penal FP7
Tip solutie: Amână cauza
Solutia pe scurt: Respinge cererea de recuzare ca nefondată. Obligă petentul Raneti Tudor Andrei la 150 lei cheltuieli
judiciare către stat. Fără cale de atac. Pronunțată în ședință publică, azi 21.06.2016.
Document: Încheiere – recuzare 21.06.2016

17.06.2016

Ora estimata: 9:00


Complet: Fond Penal FP5
Tip solutie: Amână cauza
Solutia pe scurt: Amâna cauza la data de 24.06.2016 pentru soluționarea cererii de recuzare.
Document: Încheiere de ședință 17.06.2016

06.06.2016

Ora estimata: 9:00


Complet: Fond Penal FP6
Tip solutie: Amână cauza
Solutia pe scurt: În baza disp. art. 68 C.pr.pen. cu ref. la art. 64 C.pr.pen., respinge, ca nefondată, cererile de
recuzare formulate de contestatorul Raneti Tudor Andrei, privind pe judecătorii Popa Mariana și Neagu Rodica,
judecători desemnați prin rotație cu soluționarea cauzelor din completul FP5. Fără cale de atac. Soluționată în camera
de consiliu și pronunțată în ședință publică, azi, 06.06.2016.
Document: Încheiere – recuzare 06.06.2016

2 of 3 17.10.2016 17:30
ANNEX
Tribunalul VRANCEA 9 / ECHRdosar
- Informaţii Page 117 of 403 http://portal.just.ro/91/SitePages/Dosar.aspx?id_dosar=23100000000150...

03.06.2016

Ora estimata: 9:00


Complet: Fond Penal FP5
Tip solutie: Amână cauza
Solutia pe scurt: În vederea soluționării cererii de recuzare și pentru studierea actelor depuse depuse la dosar, amâna
cauza pentru data de 17.03.2016
Document: Încheiere de ședință 03.06.2016

13.05.2016

Ora estimata: 9:00


Complet: Fond Penal FP5
Tip solutie: Amână cauza
Solutia pe scurt: Față de cererea de sesizare a Curții Constituționale, amână cauza și acordă un nou termen de
judecată pentru când petentul are termen în cunoștință.
Document: Încheiere de ședință 13.05.2016

22.04.2016

Ora estimata: 9:00


Complet: Fond Penal FP5
Tip solutie: Amână cauza
Solutia pe scurt: amânat la cererea contestatorului pentru a pregăti apărarea, respectiv soluționarea cererilor
promovate.
Document: Încheiere de ședință 22.04.2016

22.04.2016

Ora estimata: 9:00


Complet: Fond Penal FP5
Tip solutie: Amână cauza
Solutia pe scurt: Respinge ca inadmisibilă cererea de recuzare formulată de contestatorul Raneti Tudor Andrei. Obligă
contestatorul la 100 lei cheltuieli judiciare către stat. Def.
Document: Încheiere – recuzare 22.04.2016

Căi atac

Dată declarare Parte declarantă Cale de atac

29/12/2015 RANETI TUDOR ANDREI, Recurs

08/02/2016 RANETI TUDOR ANDREI, Contestație(NCPP)

09/02/2016 RANETI TUDOR ANDREI, Contestație(NCPP)

10/02/2016 Contestație(NCPP)

Citare prin publicitate

Nu există informații.

3 of 3 17.10.2016 17:30
ANNEX 9 / ECHR Page 118 of 403
ANNEX 10 / ECHR Page 119 of 403

Annex 10 inventory, summary demonstration, indicates full demonstration,

1. 2 page, annulment of the falsified “prosecutor’s” appeal in 14277/231/2015 in 2nd instance,


proving it’s an instigation to Crimes against humanity be committed against me as between 27th
May 2017 and 8th June 2017 as instigated in the identical dossier 12718/231/2017

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, particularly section I.B.14 and preliminary section 14

In conclusion the annulled falsified “prosecutor’s” appeal in 14277/231/2015 in 2nd instance is


summarily proven falsified through this annex and represents the instigation and implicitly complicity to
wrongful political repression through the perpetration of Crimes against humanity as the Romanian
“state” mafia incrementally assured itself public opinion is dead in Romania and nobody would be
outrages as nobody was for the fact I was illegally deprived of liberty, Tortured, Bodily Harmed and that
Qualified Murder has been attempted against me continuously between 27th May 2017 and 8th June
2017 by being put in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days through deadly fluorine and chlorine
injections without treatment, then after I survived forced to take other deadly fluorine and chlorine
deadly neurotoxins as objectivized in annex 21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal complaint.
ANNEX 10 / ECHR Page 120 of 403
ANNEX 10 / ECHR Page 121 of 403
ANNEX 11 / ECHR Page 122 of 403

Annex 11 inventory, summary demonstration of falsification, indicates full demonstration,

1. 1 page, falsified mandate from 5th April 2017 from 4791/231/2017

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, particularly section I.B.10 and preliminary section 10
Summary demonstration of the falsification of these documents is as follows:
All juridical acts under the rule of law are only valid if they are a syllogistical inference from a
particular factual premise correlated with an universal law premise. Because all these documents lack
either the factual premise or is falsified, or break the law premise, they are all falsified. In penal matters
the judge must motivate in fact and by right according to article 403 paragraph 1 letters c and d, and the
prosecutor according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1. The decision from 5th April 2017 from 4791/231/2017 is falsified because
1.1. see annex 1 summary, 4791/231/2017 being in ne bis in idem with 10547/231/2015
1.2. “judge” Dinu Murgulet Ana didn’t motivate the falsified decision because it’s impossible
justifying breaking the law, according to article 264 paragraph 4 and 8 letter f, and article 403 paragraph
1 letters c and d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1.3. “judge” Dinu Murgulet Ana lies I live without legal forms at my mother’s address then
contradicts himself that I couldn’t be found on three separate dates at my mother’s address where I
wasn’t subpoenaed even meaning “judge” Dinu Murgulet Ana is both lying and proving himself
schizophrenic by displaying logical incoherence and occupational dysfunction according to DSM-V
1.4. “judge” Dinu Murgulet Ana proves is schizophrenic also by declaring that ~“I must be
psychiatrically expertised because I didn’t consent”, which not only makes no sense but is obviously
illegal as I demonstrated in paragraphs 1.3, 3.2 and 3.5 from annex 1 summary
1.5 the laws, regulations, norms, deontology code and logic broke by the mafia “judge”
caporegimes I enumerate in paragraph I.3 from annex 23
In conclusion the documents contained in this annex are all falsified constituting acts of state
terrorism through illegal home breaking, detainment and harassment, as proven by the fact despite no
legal act of procedure was effectuated I was detained for 2 hours contrary to article 265 paragraph 12
from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code that imposes my immediate release, acts which later have
been used as instigation and implicitly complicity to wrongful political repression through the
perpetration of Crimes against humanity as the Romanian “state” mafia incrementally assured itself
public opinion is dead in Romania and nobody would be outrages as nobody was for the fact I was
illegally deprived of liberty, Tortured, Bodily Harmed and that Qualified Murder has been attempted
against me continuously between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 by being put in anaphylactic shock
for at least 3 days through deadly fluorine and chlorine injections without treatment, then after I
survived forced to take other deadly fluorine and chlorine deadly neurotoxins as objectivized in annex
21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal complaint. These documents are also null because all the
falsified acts of procedure in the falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016
are null for being started off from a falsified dossier as I’ve proven in my ICC penal complaint sections
I.B.2-I.B.4, according to articled 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
ANNEX 11 / ECHR Page 123 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 12 / ECHR Page 124 of 403

Annex 12 inventory, summary demonstration of falsification, indicates full demonstration,

1. 9 page, falsified decision from 10th April 2017 from 4909/231/2017

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, particularly section I.B.9 and preliminary section 9

Summary demonstration of the falsification of these documents is as follows:


All juridical acts under the rule of law are only valid if they are a syllogistical inference from a
particular factual premise correlated with an universal law premise. Because all these documents lack
either the factual premise or is falsified, or break the law premise, they are all falsified. In penal matters
the judge must motivate in fact and by right according to article 403 paragraph 1 letters c and d, and the
prosecutor according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1. The decision from 10th April 2017 from 4909/231/2017 is falsified because
1.1. see annex 11 summary, which attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
1.2. see chapter 4 from annex 1 summary because there should’ve been “psychiatric”
charlatanry falsified documents as grounds for the falsified decision in 4909/231/2017, which were
never communicated to me according to article 32, 33 paragraph 5, 58 and 61 paragraph 5 from the
Romanian Law 287/2002, article 28 paragraph 2 from the norms of application of the Romanian Law
487/2002, or in dossier 4909/231/2017 which is further motive for the nullity of the falsified decision in
4909/231/2017 based on my right to defend myself by consulting dossier 4909/231/2017 which I was
never allowed being arrested with 9 mafia soldier “gendarmes” and brought in the courthouse in the
last possible moment, then I couldn’t consult dossier 4909/231/2017 under threat of arrest and illegal
incarceration, Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualified Murder which constitute the Crimes against
humanity that were perpetrated against me between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 as proof, then I
couldn’t defend myself because I was chemically lobotomized and found it difficult to impossible to
think until my brain compensated for the destruction, but also because I feared that by consulting
dossier 4909/231/2017 I would be instigating the Romanian “state” mafia to commit Crimes against
humanity against me again as proven in annex 15 where the “judiciary bodies” declared that ~“I’m free
as long as the courthouses and hospitals deems fit” although I was never indicted, convicted or
diagnosed, then after learning that the Romanian “state” mafia issued its final solution to indefinitely
incarcerate me to life, Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualifiedly Murder me through the falsification of the
decision in dossier 12718/231/2017 as I anticipated as proven by annex 20 and sections I.B.2- I.B.4 from
my ICC penal complaint, I couldn’t consult the dossiers at the archive again for fear of arrest leading to
Crimes against humanity against me, reason for which I mandated my mother who did not find these
documents either
1.3. see chapter 2 from annex 2 summary because there should’ve been an obviously falsified
“prosecutor’s” proposal as grounds for the falsified decision in 4909/231/2017, which was never
communicated to me or in dossier 4909/231/2017 which is further motive for the nullity of the falsified
decision in 4909/231/2017 based on my right to defend myself by consulting dossier 4909/231/2017
which I was never allowed for the same reasons described in paragraph 1.2 above
ANNEX 12 / ECHR Page 125 of 403

1.4. "judge" Dinu Murgulet Ana put me in the impossibility to consult the dossier
4909/231/2017 because on 10th April 2017 before the mock trial and based on another illegal falsified
mandate by the same “judge” Dinu Murgulet Ana, I was arrested with 9 (nine) "gendarme" mafia
soldiers as if I was a MMA fighter or dangerous terrorist not an anti-mafia intellectual human rights
defender, "gendarmes" who pulled me out of my mother's home in sleeping clothes provoking me with
physical abuse while filming me, then detained me for hours for the only purpose of harassing me
physically and psychologically while I was suffering from the cold, filming all the time for the sadistic
animal gratification of the judicial prostitute who instigated them to commit abuses against me, which is
the habit of the ex-"communist" mafia "secret police" dating back to the 1989 executed Elena
Ceausescu who was notoriously even coupling her mafia "secret police" members to have sex in office
while being recorded and had a fetish listening afterwards and commenting on the records. This
particular habit of abusing people while filming them I only met personally at the Romanian National
Direction for Anticorruption led by "prosecutor" Laura Codruta Kovesi who is accused in all my penal
dossiers against the "magistrate" mafia. Futhermore “judge” Dinu Murgulet Ana verbally uttered and
repeated that he restricts my right to defend myself which is judicially preposterous, and refused to hold
any discussions in contradictory or respect any of my rights according to articles 349 and 351 from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code, because he was executing a mafia order, not conducting a legal trial.
Notice there’s no mention of the 9 (nine) "gendarme" mafia soldiers in the falsified decision from 10th
April 2017 from 4909/231/2017 4909/231/2017. These are grounds for the nullity of the falsified
decision from 10th April 2017 from 4909/231/2017 according to article 280-282 from the Romanian
Penal Procedure Code, respectively the falsified mandate which wasn’t communicated was falsified in
the same way as shown in paragraph 1.1.
1.5. "judge" Dinu Murgulet Ana, “prosecutor” Batranu Iuliana and all the members of the
“psychiatry” charlatanry committee were incompatible for multiple motives of lacking impartiality
according to articles 64 paragraph 1 letter f, 65 paragraph 1from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code,
such as “judge” Dinu Murgulet Ana instigating to Crimes against humanity by falsifying the decisions in
dossiers 4791/231/2017 and 10547/231/2015 and also covering up for the Crimes against humanity
committed in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014 by falsifying the decision in 3081/231/2016,
“prosecutor” Batranu Iuliana instigating to Crimes against humanity against me in dossier
14277/231/2015 and in at least ten other actions for the cover up of Crimes against humanity and other
felonies, respectively the psychiatry” charlatanry committee members are all accused in penal dossiers
for instigating Crimes against humanity against me before and have never being acquitted, nor were the
malpraxis complaints I opened against them ever closed, remaining to determine which actively took
part in the Crimes against humanity perpetrated against me in the night between 5th and 6th December
2014 by choosing the poison and falsifying documents to steal it from the inventory. All these multiple
accounts of incompatibility attracts the nullity of all his falsified acts of procedure from 4909/231/2017
according to article 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1.6. "judge" Dinu Murgulet Ana broke the juridical principle nemo esse iudex in sua causa potest
by illegally rejecting the request for his own removal from the dossier and refusing to send it to be
judged by another as legally required according to article 68 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code,
and refusing to abstain according to article 66 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, opening of
course the grounds for an infinite number of further chained requests of his removal from dossier
ANNEX 12 / ECHR Page 126 of 403

4909/231/2017 based on proven lack of impartiality according to article 64 paragraph 1 letter f from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code based on the breaking of the principle nemo esse iudex in sua causa
potest. Furthermore I invoked the falsification of the decision in 4791/231/2017 as grounds for “judge”
Dinu Murgulet Ana’s incompatibility in 4909/231/2017, where “judge” Dinu Murgulet Ana’s lied it has
been judged before declaring my request falsely inadmissible because the grounds I’ve invoked couldn’t
have been possibly judged before because I have never had the chance to invoke these grounds before.
“prosecutor” Batranu Iuliana also instigated that this lie be uttered, all grounds for the nullity of all the
falsified acts of procedure in 4909/231/2017 and all subsequent acts according to articles 280-282 from
the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1.7. "judge" Dinu Murgulet Ana broke the ne bis in idem principle existant between
4909/231/2017 and 11224/231/2015, because I was accused in all falsified penal dossiers against me of
fictive deeds which cannot physically exist let alone constitute penal offences therefore according to
doctrine, no deed, in my case fictive meaning the same accusation, can be judged twice under a new
penal classification as proven in this Romanian specialty article: http://legeaz.net/dictionar-
juridic/autoritate-lucru-judeact-hotarari-penale, and I prove the three conditions for ne bis in idem as
follows: the decision in 11224/231/2015 is definitive as proven by annex 4, I (eadem personae) have
been attacked with another falsified penal action with the same object as in 11224/231/2015 in
4909/231/2017 proven in annex 3 and annex 12, and, I’ve been accused identically with a fictive deed
which cannot be proven it’s another deed because it doesn’t exist and cannot physically exist therefore
the fictive accusation being identical (idem factum), and accused identically of being irresponsible,
lacking discernment and being violent without any proof or even a falsified document presented in this
regard, proven by annex 17 regarding my empty judicial history meaning never indicted or convicted,
where an indictment would contain the administration and objectivization of proofs which never existed
because the “judiciary bodies” refused to administer any proofs at all, mine or the Romanian “state”
mafia’s. If the authority of an already judged fact does not exist because there’s no definitive decision of
conviction following an indictment, it stands proof then in corroboration I am innocent according to the
presumption of innocence according to article 4 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code and article
23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution, articles 11 and 20 from Romanian Constitution that
makes Romanian ratified international treaties internal right meaning article 11 from the UDHR and
article 6 paragraph 2 from the ECHR, meaning articles 38 and 109 from the Romanian Penal Code
regarding the non-punishment clause of irresponsibility and security measures respectively cannot be
invoked against me because it refers to convicts not the suspect or the accused, reminding I proven in
section I.A.II.1.2.10^1 of my ICC penal complaint that the “psychiatric” charlatanry poisoning do not
constitute a measure of security but on the contrary creates suicidal and even worse homicidal ideation
1.8. the falsification of the mandate in 4791/231/2017 attracts the nullity of the decision in
4909/231/2017, because it attracts the nullity of the falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry documents which
never even existed in 4909/231/2017 and were never communicated to me. See paragraphs 1.1 and 1.2
1.9. the falsification of all and any acts of procedure in the falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts like the decisions in
4791/231/2017, 4909/231/2017 or any other acts derived from these falsified penal dossiers as shortly
proven by annex 17 regarding my empty judicial history, and explicitly in my ICC penal complaint
ANNEX 12 / ECHR Page 127 of 403

1.10 "judge" Dinu Murgulet Ana refused to motivate in fact and by right the falsified decision
from 4909/231/2017 because it’s impossible, which he was obligated according to article 403 paragraph
1 letters c and d and article 184 paragraph 11 letters c and d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code,
particularly because no physical deeds that can constitute felonies or are even immoral are proven to
exist in the falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 because they cannot
physically exist let alone constitute felonies or premises for diagnostics, as I’ve objectivized in sections
I.B.2-I.B.4 from my ICC Penal Complaint, and in annex 8 summary, that listening on audio books on
earphones cannot physically disturb anyone else and is not a felony even ad absurdum it could, that is
physically impossible to make audio/video recordings with earphones nor is it necessary with the mobile
phone since the courthouse meeting is recorded by default and the recording is available to anyone,
especially the parties as I’ve obtained it and accused the mafia with it proving my innocence, nor is this
even ad absurdum a felony, respectively the mafia sends the falsified document proofs by post, email or
are available in the courthouse archive, that is impossible to commit obscene gestures and utter
obscene words the accusers and the witness declare they never saw or heard as objectively
corroborated with the audio/video recording of the courthouse, and that is impossible to commit a
felony by pleading in defense of my rights as particularly proven in annex 9 summary
1.11. "judge" Dinu Murgulet Ana refused to denounce the falsification of all the acts of
procedure in penal dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 according to articles 61 and
291 from the Romanian Penal Code, which makes "judge" Dinu Murgulet Ana incompatible to judge or
be a judge according to article 64 paragraph 1 letter f from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code because
the paramount condition to be a judge is to exclusively obey the law according to article 124 paragraph
3 from the Romanian Constitution, for being accomplice to and instigating Crimes against humanity be
committed against me as he did through the falsification of the decision in 4909/231/2017 in 1st instance
as objectivized in sections A and I.B.9 of my ICC penal complaint, and annex 21 representing my proven
grounds to fear indefinite incarceration to life, Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualified Murder which
determined me to become a refugee between 11th April 2017 and 27th May 2017 when I was captured
by the Romanian “state” mafia who committed Crimes against humanity against me as I’ve objectivized
particularly in section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal complaint
1.12 the laws, regulations, norms, deontology code and logic broke by the mafia “judge”
caporegimes I enumerate in paragraph I.3 from annex 23
In conclusion the document contained in this annex is a direct instigation and implicitly
complicity to wrongful political repression through the perpetration of Crimes against humanity as the
Romanian “state” mafia incrementally assured itself public opinion is dead in Romania and nobody
would be outrages as nobody was for the fact I was illegally deprived of liberty, Tortured, Bodily
Harmed and that Qualified Murder has been attempted against me continuously between 27th May
2017 and 8th June 2017 by being put in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days through deadly fluorine
and chlorine injections without treatment, then after I survived forced to take other deadly fluorine and
chlorine deadly neurotoxins as objectivized in annex 21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal
complaint. These documents are also null because all the falsified acts of procedure in the falsified penal
dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 are null for being started off from a falsified
dossier as I’ve proven in my ICC penal complaint sections I.B.2-I.B.4, according to articled 280-282 from
the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
ANNEX 12 / ECHR Page 128 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 12 / ECHR Page 129 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 12 / ECHR Page 130 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 12 / ECHR Page 131 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 12 / ECHR Page 132 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 12 / ECHR Page 133 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 12 / ECHR Page 134 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 12 / ECHR Page 135 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 12 / ECHR Page 136 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 13 / ECHR Page 137 of 403

Annex 13 inventory, summary demonstration of falsification, indicates full demonstration,

1. 1 page, falsified address from 14th April 2017 from 4909/231/2017 in 2nd instance, when the
falsified decision in 4909/231/2017 in 1st instance should’ve already been annulled

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, particularly section I.B.7 and preliminary section 7
Summary demonstration of the falsification of these documents is as follows:
All juridical acts under the rule of law are only valid if they are a syllogistical inference from a
particular factual premise correlated with an universal law premise. Because all these documents lack
either the factual premise or is falsified, or break the law premise, they are all falsified. In penal matters
the judge must motivate in fact and by right according to article 403 paragraph 1 letters c and d, and the
prosecutor according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1. The address from 14th April 2017 from 4909/231/2017 in 2nd instance is falsified because
1.1. “judge” Neagu Rodica instead of annulling the falsified decision in 4909/231/2017 in 1st
instance for all the reasons demonstrated in annex 12, infringed the presumption of innocence
demanding from me as medieval witch trials went to ~“prove you’re not the devil”, that is prove that I’m
mentally sane which I did before it was illegally demanded as proven by annex 22 regarding the fact I’m
army incorporable, and other proofs regarding the fact I have ~4 legal medicine certificates that I’m
mentally sane and apt for work, emitted according to the law in respect to my 4 legal years of work with
superior studies, superior studies for which I have been declared mentally sane before, then again as
proven by annex 22 being a student in law which is the second career the Romanian “state” mafia
destroyed directly by committing Crimes against humanity against me after arresting me from my law
faculty exams as proven in section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal complaint then forcing me to become a
permanent refugee from 1st September 2017 from grounded fear of indefinite incarceration to life,
torture and murder, as objectivized in annex 21. As proof of motive “judge” Neagu Rodica afterwards
delayed then falsified the decision in 1779/91/2017 to instigate then cover-up the Crimes against
humanity committed against me between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 - see annex 15, as it did
before about the Crimes against humanity committed in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014
In conclusion the document contained in this annex is a direct instigation and implicitly
complicity to wrongful political repression through the perpetration of Crimes against humanity as the
Romanian “state” mafia incrementally assured itself public opinion is dead in Romania and nobody
would be outrages as nobody was for the fact I was illegally deprived of liberty, Tortured, Bodily
Harmed and that Qualified Murder has been attempted against me continuously between 27th May
2017 and 8th June 2017 by being put in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days through deadly fluorine
and chlorine injections without treatment, then after I survived forced to take other deadly fluorine and
chlorine deadly neurotoxins as objectivized in annex 21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal
complaint. These documents are also null because all the falsified acts of procedure in the falsified penal
dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 are null for being started off from a falsified
dossier as I’ve proven in my ICC penal complaint sections I.B.2-I.B.4, according to articled 280-282 from
the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
ANNEX 13 / ECHR Page 138 of 403
ANNEX 14 / ECHR Page 139 of 403

Annex 14 inventory, summary demonstration of falsification, indicates full demonstration,

1. 1 page, falsified decision from 18th May 2017 from 4909/231/2017 in 2nd instance

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, particularly section I.B.7 and preliminary section 7

Summary demonstration of the falsification of these documents is as follows:


All juridical acts under the rule of law are only valid if they are a syllogistical inference from a
particular factual premise correlated with an universal law premise. Because all these documents lack
either the factual premise or is falsified, or break the law premise, they are all falsified. In penal matters
the judge must motivate in fact and by right according to article 403 paragraph 1 letters c and d, and the
prosecutor according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1. The decision from 18th May 2017 from 4909/231/2017 in 2nd instance is falsified because
1.1. “judge” Croitoru Sandina Mariana didn’t annul the falsified decision in 4909/231/2017 in 1st
instance for all the reasons of nullity according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure
Code demonstrated in annex 12, “judge” Croitoru Sandina Mariana proving is schizophrenic through the
multitude of accounts of logical incoherence equal to the number of illegalities committed in the
falsified decision in 4909/231/2017 in 1st instance, and implicit occupational dysfunction, according to
the DSM-V “psychiatry” charlatanry manual of diagnosis and statistics
1.2. “judge” Croitoru Sandina Mariana stolen an administrative request through which I
demanded according to the law and Ministry of justice and Supreme Magistrate Council joint order that
my name be hidden from public evidence of the ECRIS public evidence of dossiers. “judge” Croitoru
Sandina Mariana lied it was a penal matter request which it obviously wasn’t, nor did I address it to
dossier 4909/231/2017, and instead of directing it to the Ministry of justice according to Government
Ordnance 27/2002, it falsified a decision of cover-up declaring it inadmissible, “judge” Croitoru Sandina
Mariana proving again his schizophrenia
1.3. “judge” Croitoru Sandina Mariana declared my request of notification of the Romanian
Constitutional Court inadmissible uttering a pile of gibberish and lies with no connection to my request,
breaking the article 403 paragraph 1 letter c and d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code regarding
the judge’s obligation to syllogistically motivate a decision inferring only from the universal premise of
the law corroborated with the particular factual premise respecting all the syllogistical laws such as not
omitting or adding facts and laws that are irrelevant, “judge” Croitoru Sandina Mariana proving again his
schizophrenia, mentioning he has a schizophrenic brother meaning “judge” Croitoru Sandina Mariana
schizophrenia is of genetic pathogenesis, which stands proof the Romanian “state” mafia deliberately
hires schizophrenics into the magistrate body because they are mentally labile and commit felonies on
demand. “judge” Croitoru Sandina Mariana’s criminal biography is all the more interesting because is
marries to a priest, with which I corroborate to the multitude of proofs the totalitarian “communist”
regime comprised of illiterate and immoral peasants that form a veritable mafia, closely collaborated
with the orthodox clergy for the persecution of Christians and still does, as no real orthodox priest
would’ve married a schizophrenic criminal judicial prostitute, meaning the Romanian Orthodox Church
ANNEX 14 / ECHR Page 140 of 403

hierarchy is thoroughly corrupt as notoriously known in Romania anyway, and even more interesting is
the explicated fact the priest I was frequenting after being accomplice in the Crimes against humanity
on 27th May 2017 and consequently that followed, was awarded service exactly with this “judge”
Croitoru Sandina Mariana’s “priest” husband out of all of tens of churches in the town, situation of
which I also speak at large in section I.A.II.1.3.1^7.2 of my ICC penal complaint
1.4. “judge” Croitoru Sandina Mariana is accused in many penal dossiers in which he was never
acquitted, reason for which “judge” Croitoru Sandina Mariana was incompatible according to article 64
paragraph 1 letter f from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, which attracts the nullity of all acts of
procedure “judge” Croitoru Sandina Mariana falsified in 4909/231/2017 in 2nd instance, according to
articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1.5. the laws, regulations, norms, deontology code and logic broke by the mafia “judge”
caporegimes I enumerate in paragraph I.3 from annex 23

In conclusion the document contained in this annex is a direct instigation and implicitly
complicity to wrongful political repression through the perpetration of Crimes against humanity as the
Romanian “state” mafia incrementally assured itself public opinion is dead in Romania and nobody
would be outrages as nobody was for the fact I was illegally deprived of liberty, Tortured, Bodily
Harmed and that Qualified Murder has been attempted against me continuously between 27th May
2017 and 8th June 2017 by being put in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days through deadly fluorine
and chlorine injections without treatment, then after I survived forced to take other deadly fluorine and
chlorine deadly neurotoxins as objectivized in annex 21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal
complaint. These documents are also null because all the falsified acts of procedure in the falsified penal
dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 are null for being started off from a falsified
dossier as I’ve proven in my ICC penal complaint sections I.B.2-I.B.4, according to articled 280-282 from
the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
ANNEX 14 / ECHR Page 141 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 14 / ECHR Page 142 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 14 / ECHR Page 143 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 14 / ECHR Page 144 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 14 / ECHR Page 145 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 14 / ECHR Page 146 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 14 / ECHR Page 147 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 14 / ECHR Page 148 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 15 / ECHR Page 149 of 403

Annex 15 inventory, summary demonstration of falsification, indicates full demonstration,

1. 1 page, falsified decision from 21st June 2017 from 1779/91/2017

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, particularly section I.B.5 and preliminary section 5

Summary demonstration of the falsification of these documents is as follows:


All juridical acts under the rule of law are only valid if they are a syllogistical inference from a
particular factual premise correlated with an universal law premise. Because all these documents lack
either the factual premise or is falsified, or break the law premise, they are all falsified. In penal matters
the judge must motivate in fact and by right according to article 403 paragraph 1 letters c and d, and the
prosecutor according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code

1. The decision from 21st June 2017 from 1779/91/2017 is falsified because
1.1. “judge” Neagu Rodica delayed the trial in 1779/91/2017 to allow the Crimes against
humanity committed between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 to occur, which he tried in
4909/231/2017 in 2nd instance also delaying the trial and demanding as medieval trials went that I
“prove I’m not the devil” which was a ruse to get be captured by the mafia. Breaking the law attracts the
nullity of falsified acts of procedure and all subsequent acts
1.2. “judge” Neagu Rodica participated in the attacked falsified trial 4909/231/2017 in 2nd
instance, reason for which he was incompatible to address dossier 1779/91/2017 according to article 64
paragraph 3 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, and he was obligated to abstain according to
article 66 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, which attracts the nullity of all acts of procedure
falsified by “judge” Neagu Rodica, and all subsequent acts
1.3. “judge” Neagu Rodica lied that only decisions falsified by instances of appeal can be
attacked by an appeal in annulment, because as my mafia appointed “lawyer” retained, I proved with
“25 pages” of law, doctrine and jurisprudence all definitive penal decisions are attackable by appeal in
annulment, in reality the mafia associated “lawyer” hallucinating because I used only 1 page of law and
2 and a half pages of jurisprudence constituting together the doctrine of the Romanian judiciary system
before the Romanian “state” mafia decides to empower itself limiting the ways their falsified judiciary
decisions can be attacked by their victims, with a falsified supreme court decision with no juridical force
whatsoever which the entire “magistrate” caporegimes mafia applies, with small exceptions again as
proof I’m right. The concrete proof is that all definitive penal decisions can be attacked with an appeal in
annulment according to article 426 letter d, particularly the disjunctive condition that “there was a case
of incompatibility” which regards the entire article 64 and other cases according to the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code, and ad absurdum if the law doesn’t provide which it does, and the law doesn’t interdict
either the judgment because justice is about restoration of the order of right not denial of justice
obviously, according to article 4 paragraph 2 from Romanian Law 303/2004 a judge cannot refuse to
judge on grounds that the law doesn’t provide, but is obligated to judge, therefore an appeal in
annulment either way cannot be declared inadmissible meaning be rejected on the motive the law
ANNEX 15 / ECHR Page 150 of 403

doesn’t foresee because it does first of all. My angle is always attacking the fact the “judge” falsified the
decision I’m formulating an appeal in annulment against, which always constitutes the incompatibility
case foreseen by article 64 paragraph 1 letter f from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code regarding lack
of impartiality which is proven beyond any reasonable doubt by a “judge” breaking the law with malice
aforethought, which is guaranteed in Romania where all “magistrates” are corrupt and criminal as I’ve
proved publicly and in every action against their falsified decisions, reason for which the Romanian
“state” mafia committed since 2014 1 Qualified Murder attempt, 2 instances of Crimes against
humanity meaning Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualified Murder attempts, and 5 instances of Crime
against humanity attempts, to stop me from denouncing its criminal activity, as proven in this Rule 39
ECHR urgent request for interim measures and my ICC penal complaint
1.4. “judge” Neagu Rodica didn’t annul the falsified decisions in 4909/231/2017 for all the
reasons of nullity according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code demonstrated
in annex 12 and annex 14, “judge” Neagu Rodica proving is schizophrenic through the multitude of
accounts of logical incoherence equal to the number of illegalities committed in the falsified decisions in
4909/231/2017, and implicit occupational dysfunction, according to the DSM-V “psychiatry” charlatanry
manual of diagnosis and statistics
1.5. “judge” Neagu Rodica copy-pasted the falsified and schizophrenic plead of “judge” Croitoru
Sandina Mariana regarding my administrative request which was stolen and covered-up with a falsified
logically incoherent decision instead of being forwarded to the Ministry of justice, then copy-pasted the
falsified and schizophrenic plead of “judge” Croitoru Sandina Mariana regarding my request of
notification of the Romanian Constitutional Court inadmissible, meaning the pile of gibberish and lies
with no connection to my request, breaking identically thus the article 403 paragraph 1 letter c and d
from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code regarding the judge’s obligation to syllogistically motivate a
decision inferring only from the universal premise of the law corroborated with the particular factual
premise respecting all the syllogistical laws such as not omitting or adding facts and laws that are
irrelevant, “judge” Neagu Rodica proving his schizophrenia by resonating with “judge” Croitoru Sandina
Mariana schizophrenia as judges are obligated to obey the law not mafia orders or their own
hallucinations, then copy-pasted the falsified and schizophrenic plead of “judge” Croitoru Sandina
Mariana in an failed attempt to cover-up the instigation to Crimes against humanity which actually
proves it by the obsession to break every relevant law with malice aforethought, typical of sociopaths,
copy-pasting entirely irrelevant because the falsification of the rejection of admissal in principle of the
appeal in annulment stage was enough - no need to refer to the rest, which proves again “judge” Neagu
Rodica is schizophrenic or logically incoherent and occupationally dysfunctional according to DSM-V
1.6. “judge” Neagu Rodica is accused in many penal dossiers in which he was never acquitted,
reason for which “judge” Neagu Rodica was incompatible according to article 64 paragraph 1 letter f
from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, which attracts the nullity of all acts of procedure “judge”
Neagu Rodica falsified in 1779/91/2017, according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code

In conclusion the document contained in this annex is a direct instigation and implicitly
complicity to wrongful political repression through the perpetration of Crimes against humanity as the
Romanian “state” mafia incrementally assured itself public opinion is dead in Romania and nobody
ANNEX 15 / ECHR Page 151 of 403

would be outrages as nobody was for the fact I was illegally deprived of liberty, Tortured, Bodily
Harmed and that Qualified Murder has been attempted against me continuously between 27th May
2017 and 8th June 2017 by being put in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days through deadly fluorine
and chlorine injections without treatment, then after I survived forced to take other deadly fluorine and
chlorine deadly neurotoxins as objectivized in annex 21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal
complaint. These documents are also null because all the falsified acts of procedure in the falsified penal
dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 are null for being started off from a falsified
dossier as I’ve proven in my ICC penal complaint sections I.B.2-I.B.4, according to articled 280-282 from
the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
ANNEX 15 / ECHR Page 152 of 403
ANNEX 15 / ECHR Page 153 of 403
ANNEX 15 / ECHR Page 154 of 403
ANNEX 15 / ECHR Page 155 of 403
ANNEX 15 / ECHR Page 156 of 403
ANNEX 15 / ECHR Page 157 of 403
ANNEX 15 / ECHR Page 158 of 403
ANNEX 15 / ECHR Page 159 of 403
ANNEX 15 / ECHR Page 160 of 403
ANNEX 15 / ECHR Page 161 of 403
ANNEX 15 / ECHR Page 162 of 403
ANNEX 15 / ECHR Page 163 of 403
ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 164 of 403

Annex 16 inventory, summary demonstration of falsification, indicates full demonstration,

1. 2 page, falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry incarceration papers, illegal, groundless, self-


contradictory and syllogistically invalid, proving the “psychiatric” charlatans are schizophrenic
and criminal sociopaths, and that they committed Crimes against humanity against me

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, in particular sections I.A in general, I.A.II.1.3.1^7 in particular, I.B.6
and preliminary section 6

Summary demonstration of the falsification of these documents is as follows:


All juridical acts under the rule of law are only valid if they are a syllogistical inference from a
particular factual premise correlated with an universal law premise. Because all these documents lack
either the factual premise or is falsified, or break the law premise, they are all falsified. In penal matters
the judge must motivate in fact and by right according to article 403 paragraph 1 letters c and d, and the
prosecutor according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code

1. the falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry incarceration papers are illegal, groundless, self-
contradictory and syllogistically invalid, proving the “psychiatric” charlatans are schizophrenic and
criminal sociopaths who committed Crimes against humanity against me, because
1.1. all the falsified acts of procedure in the falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016
and 4329/P/2016 are null for being started off from a falsified dossier as I’ve proven in my ICC penal
complaint sections I.B.2-I.B.4, according to articled 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code.
See annex 8 and annex 9 summaries
1.2. the proposal for an impossible “psychiatric” charlatanry “examination” is illegal according to
article 184 paragraph 1 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code therefore all the subsequent acts of
procedure are null according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code. See
paragraph 1.3 from annex 1 summary
1.3. the decision in 4791/231/2017 is falsified therefore all the subsequent acts of procedure are
null according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code. See annex 11 summary
1.4. there was no recommendation for “psychiatric” incarceration ever communicated to me in
a futile mafia’s attempt to cover up the falsification of these documents which can only be falsified as
proven by the identical legal and factual situation presented in chapter 4 from annex 1 summary, reason
for which they are null according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code. The
other reason the mafia didn’t communicate them to me being that of obstructing my right to defend
myself, therefore all the subsequent acts of procedure are null according to articles 280-282 from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1.5. there was no “prosecutor’s” proposal for “psychiatric” charlatanry incarceration from
4909/231/2017 ever communicated to me in a futile mafia’s attempt to cover up the falsification of this
documents which can only be falsified as proven by the relative (to the falsification of penal dossiers as
proven in paragraph 1) identical legal and factual situation presented in chapter 5 from annex 1
ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 165 of 403

summary, reason for which they are null according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code. The other reason the mafia didn’t communicate this document to me being that of
obstructing my right to defend myself, for which the mafia even arrested me on 10th April 2017 with 9
“gendarme” mafia soldiers harassing me before bringing me in the last possible moment in court,
“gendarmes” who even stolen two pencils from me when I asked for a piece of paper to write my
defense while in illegal detention, the schizophrenic “gendarmes” motivating that I would hurt myself
with the pencils (that I already had because the mafia being dumb peasants didn’t think to confiscate
when searching me with no reason) writing my defense, proof of the “gendarmes” schizophrenia which
is recorded audio/video except the Romanian “state” mafia refuses to release the illegal footage proving
also the fact they abused me physically in a futile attempt to provoke me while in violation of property
with a falsified mandate they of course also refused to communicate, therefore all the subsequent acts
of procedure are null according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1.6. the decision in 4909/231/2017 is falsified therefore all the subsequent acts of procedure are
null according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code. See annex 12 summary
1.7. the decision in 4909/231/2017 in 2nd instance is falsified therefore all the subsequent acts of
procedure are null according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code. See annex
14 summary
1.8. the decision in 1779/91/2017 is falsified therefore all the subsequent acts of procedure are
null according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code. See annex 15 summary
1.9. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie by omission to recommend themselves as charlatans
constituted in an organized criminal group because they obviously know this about themselves as they
know about each other, and cover-up each other’s crimes. I’ve proven in section A of my ICC penal
complaint at “psychiatry” worldwide is charlatanry, neither medicine nor science as I’ve objectivized in
section I.A.II.1.2.1 of my ICC penal complaint
1.10. see paragraph 3.5 from annex 4 summary. The falsified decision in 4909/231/2017 in 1st
and 2nd instance is in ne bis in idem relation with the falsified decision in 11224/231/2015 in 1st instance
which was annulled as unfounded in 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance - see paragraph 1.7 from annex 12
summary.The judge in 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance obviously motivated that suing and penally
denouncing a criminal “judge” is not a reason to doubt anyone’s discernment and propose a
“psychiatric” charlatanry “examination” of suspects and accused of homicide, being a right
1.11. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lied, omitting that I am allergic to injections and foreign
bodies after I informed them and as proven anyway by the blood test in which the mafia fools left the
allergy evidence as proven in section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 and A.I.1-2 of my ICC penal complaint. The
“psychiatrist” torturers kept poisoning me sadistically every time I reported I am suffering, as they knew
they were torturing me and that they put me in anaphylactic shock which was premeditated as proven
by the fact 5 “psychiatrist” torturers were waiting for me after the mafia “secret police” incarcerated me
in the Focsani “psychiatric” gulag where I was immediately and violently tied to an operating table and
poisoned with deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins daily for 3 days, which the “psychiatrist”
torturers also lied through omission to journalize the truth about the Crimes against humanity they
committed
1.12. the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie that they have examined me between 27th May 2017 and
8th June 2017, by
ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 166 of 403

1.12.1 declaring the falsified diagnostics instead of proving them which demonstrates they are
falsified from the start - because it’s impossible, they are not syllogistically inferred from a particular
factual premise and a law, regulation, medical and scientific objectivization universal premise.
Furthermore as I’ll objectivize the filler “psychiatric” charlatanry words thrown chaotically in a failed
attempt to falsify the appearance of an expertise, are contradicting themselves because the
schizophrenic “psychiatric” torturers weren’t thinking, besides the fact is impossible to justify breaking
the law or contradict the reality
1.12.2 declaring the falsified psychological results from 29th May 2017 psychiatric. According to
article 10 from Romanian Law 487/2002 the “psychiatric” charlatanry examination is performed with a
“psychiatrist” charlatan. The psychological test from 29th May 2017 was relatively identical to the at
least 4 legal work medicine psychological tests I took for work in which I was declared mentally sane,
and because I responded identically on 29th May 2017 the results could’ve only been identical which
proves beyond any reasonable doubt that they were falsified as I’ll punctually objectivize in paragraphs
to follow, corroborated with annex 22 which is the latest proof of my mental health meaning army
incorporable and apt for superior studies
1.12.3 declaring the irrelevant medical examination and falsified diagnosis presented in
paragraph 1.13
1.12.4 declaring the falsified psychological results from 8th June 2017 psychiatric, which actually
thanks to the mafia’s stupidity constitutes proof of the chemical lobotomization by lowering my IQ to 98
when in actuality without concentration is 113/119 and above 140 concentrated as I’ve tested with
internet intelligence tests after I’ve recovered sufficiently from chemical lobotomisation and my brain
compensated with the mechanical ability to artificially recreate and perform as myself from memory -
about which I repeat I never recovered the amputated ability to enjoy life. The most relevant proof is
that in the army incorporation intelligence test I scored A, then afterwards I increased my intelligence
further through superior studies and practice which the troglodyte peasants couldn’t tolerate so they
had to destroy with absolute no reason since for all my efforts I haven’t obtained justice, which proves
the Romanian peasant mafia is Stalinist paranoid
1.12.5 declaring the falsified CT scan which has no psychiatric relevance being a scan for the
bones of the head or massive intracranial bleeding at best. The mafia proposed it to irradiate my brain
since this scan is performed by hundreds of x-ray scans, and to make up futile attempts to contradict my
MRI scans and medical diagnosis of cerebral damage in the occipital and frontal area corresponding to
the mechanics of the violent head trauma suffered, the schizophrenic torturer “psychiatrist” Barbarosie
Carmen even arrogating herself the title of radiologist without any competence in an attempt to
convince me Crimes against humanity weren’t perpetrated against me in the night between 5th and 6th
December 2014 meaning inclusively the Bodily Harm and Qualified Murder attempt perpetrated by
interloper Herghelegiu Danut at the instigation of the mafia, as if I wasn’t there and don’t observe the
symptoms every microsecond since then, not being surprised of the torturer sociopath’s audacity since
I’ve lived half a life amongst them always observing there is something terribly wrong with them
1.12.6 declaring the blood test which has no psychiatric relevance as proven in annex 16
1.12.7 declaring the urine test which has no psychiatric relevance as proven in annex 16
1.12.8 declaring that on 8th June 2017 I was “expertized” by “psychiatric” charlatanry legal
medicine (reminding the “psychiatric” charlatanry is neither medicine nor science as I’ve objectivized in
ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 167 of 403

section I.A.II.1.2.1 of my ICC penal complaint, it’s charlatanry therefore it can’t be legal under the rule of
law), which is obviously false because it cannot be proven in any way while I am proving no “psychiatric”
charlatanry “expertise” could ever take place because I never consented to the “psychiatry” charlatanry
fakery and never cooperated, except perhaps at the army incorporation when I was as stupid as
everyone else about it and was declared mentally healthy by the “psychiatry” charlatanry for being
ignorant of this man made reality which is the “psychiatry” charlatanry, although I felt something was
wrong with the “psychiatrists” and “psychologists” even then, that they aren’t honest people. No
“expertise” was ever communicated to me according to articles 32, 33 paragraph 5, 58 and 61 paragraph
5 from the Romanian Law 487/2002, article 28 paragraph 2 from the norms of application of the
Romanian Law 487/2002, or article 566 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, my mother or in the
falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 or 12718/231/2017 where I
mandated my mother to look. Not only no such “psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise” took place
physically but I haven’t given my consent making it therefore physically impossible as I didn’t cooperate
and as I always affirmed and proven no “psychiatric” charlatanry “examination” is possible without my
consent, and I’ld have to be mentally alienated to give credibility to the “psychiatric” charlatanry by
consenting to their fakery, and the fact I was injected with deadly fluorine poisons and put in
anaphylactic shock without a diagnosis and by breaking every relevant law proves my incarceration was
as demonstrated in section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal complaint only for the purpose of committing
Crimes against humanity against me to stop me from denouncing the criminal activity of the mafia, the
“examinations” enumerated above being obvious as proven pretexts and puerile failed cover-up
attempts
1.13 the “psychiatrist” charlatans prove they are schizophrenic introducing falsified medical
diagnosis whose only relevance is that the “psychiatrist” charlatans attempt to cover-up the Crimes
against humanity they committed against me, that is the symptoms of putting me in anaphylactic shock
for at least 3 days through deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxin injections without treatment
expecting me to die then falsify the diagnosis declaring natural causes in notorious totalitarian
Romanian fashion, as further proven by the fact after I survived the first 3 days the “psychiatrist”
torturers started forcing me to take other deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins until 8th June 2017 as
proven in section I.A.II.1.3.1^7, in reality the symptoms being generated from poisoning such as the
blood proof of allergy and the fact my who body was shacking from poisoning for the first 3 days,
respectively my neck was irritated so the “acute amygdalitis” diagnosis is falsified as my amygdales
weren’t even touched let alone swollen, the “chronic rhinitis” diagnosis is totally falsified but is one of
the expected symptoms of fluorine poisoning which didn’t happen, the “nasal sept deviation” diagnosis
is irrelevant, the “minor Cranio-Cerebral-Trauma” is falsified with the intent to cover-up the Crimes
against humanity committed against me in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014 when as
thoroughly proven in section I.B.22 of my ICC penal complaint I was hit violently hit on the back of my
head by interloper Herghelegiu Danut who then violently hit my head against the wall and pushed me
unconsciously on a flight of stairs to make it look like an accident as instigated by the Romanian “state”
mafia who after I survived and was transported to the emergency ward of “Saint Pantelimon” hospital in
Focsani, committed Crimes against humanity in the same night poisoning me with the same deadly
fluorine neurotoxin I was poisoned between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, covertly in my right elbow
as proven by sections I.A.II.1.3.1^7 and I.A.I.1-2 of my ICC penal complaint, then instigated the “legal
ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 168 of 403

medic” mafia associates to falsify the report on 8th December 2014 and not send me to the proper
medical specialties as I’ve proven after sent by an ophthalmologist to a neurologist then sent for further
medical investigations, I obtained 2 MRI scans and radiologist reports, 2 neurologist reports and 2
neurosurgeon reports who the same “legal medics” mafia associates first lied afterwards they can’t
make another report or append to the old one, then falsified the old report when I came back assisted
by a lawyer, the “legal medics” lying obviously all my proofs are falsified, then the mafia to cover all this
up committed 5 more Crimes against humanity attempts while simultaneously falsifying acts of
procedures of cover-up, hiding and destroying proofs, censoring my published penal dossiers on
militia.freeforums.net and partially my facebook.com account, then committed Crimes against
humanity against me between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 as objectivized in section I.A.II.1.3.1 of
my ICC penal complaint
1.14 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie the “psychiatric” incarceration was for the legal medicine
expertise and evaluation of current psychological state. According to article 184 from the Romanian
Penal Procedure Code which was broken in all relevant ways as proven in the paragraphs above, it was
for the physically impossible legal medicine expertise for the days of 18th May 2016 and 24th June 2016
when the mafia framed me for deeds that cannot physically exist and therefore cannot constitute
felonies or premises for diagnosis, expertise which obviously cannot be performed between 27th May
2017 and 8th June 2017 because it has no relevance according even to the “psychiatric” charlatanry
regulations that a diagnosis is only relevant for the time the person was examined, meaning as soon as
the diagnosed person leaves observation the diagnosis is no longer relevant, and the diagnosis cannot
be placed as proof based on past observations according to article 122 from the regulations of the
Socola “psychiatric” gulag, which I’m invoking because I was never communicated the regulations from
Focsani “psychiatric” gulag, which can only be identical since they extract juridical force from the same
law and unique juridical logic, namely article 14 paragraph 2 from the Romanian Law 487/2002. Any
examination was also physically impossible because I didn’t consent and therefore didn’t cooperate, and
although I never lie in juridical acts, in this situation it can be retained I lied by omission to the mafia that
in exchange of stopping the torture I would stop denouncing its criminal activity making penal dossiers
against it and publishing them, which technically is the truth since I only continued denouncing the
mafia’s criminal activity to ECHR which is probably the reason the mafia issued its final solution seeking
to indefinitely to life incarcerate me, torture me and murder me through the falsified dossier
12718/231/2017 where in 1st instance the mafia desperately sentenced me for the crimes and diagnosis
of a person named Vasilache Daniel because I was never indicted, convicted and diagnosed, then in
12718/231/2017 in 2nd instance the mafia invoked the annulled documents from 14277/231/2015,
which is further proof of ne bis in idem with 12718/231/2017. The “psychiatric” charlatanry
incarceration being illegal attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
1.15 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie omitting to report the fact the decision in 4909/231/2017 is
obviously falsified as I proven in annex 12 and annex 14, reason for which they were obligated by the
law to not deprive me illegally of liberty to begin with, then without any cover-up attempt they
committed Crimes against humanity against me proving through this it was premeditated. The
“psychiatric” charlatanry incarceration being illegal attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
1.16 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie omitting to report the fact I wasn’t brought by “police
bodies” but by the mafia “secret police” soldiers, evident since they weren’t in uniform, they didn’t have
ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 169 of 403

a legal mandate but a falsified mandate, and of course it is proven they instigated that Crimes against
humanity be committed and even stuck around to sadistically witness them and psychologically harass
my mother as proven in section I.A.II. 1.3.1^7.2. of my ICC penal complaint. The “psychiatric”
charlatanry incarceration being illegal attracts the nullity of all subsequent acts
1.17 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie omitting I was never held in the guard room but I was taken
by force in an “emergency” room where 5 “psychiatric” torturers were waiting for me and violently tied
me to an operating table and poisoned me with deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins for at least 3
days putting me in anaphylactic shock, then after I survived they forced me to take other deadly fluorine
and chlorine neurotoxins for 10 days until 8th June 2017, as proven in section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC
penal complaint. The Crimes against humanity perpetrated against me in “psychiatric” incarceration by
“psychiatric” torturers needless to say being illegal attract the nullity of all subsequent acts. In the
“emergency” room I’ve been sequestered with about 8 other persons with real neurological problems
who were yelling all the time, some of them 2 in the same bed, unwashed, uncared for and as I later
witnessed beaten and poisoned
1.18 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie I was “agitated”, this being the first lie all “psychiatrist”
charlatans in the world are taught to lie, even about normal pacing as I’ve objectivized in section
I.A.II.1.4.
1.19 the “psychiatrist” charlatans knowing they are committing Crimes against humanity are
always stressed by their victims claiming their rights and proving they are aware grave felonies are
committed against them, so the “psychiatric” torturers being sociopaths manifest their typical
characteristic of thinking all they do is good and all their victim do is bad and that inherently their victim
has no rights - only the sociopath torturer has the right to victimize anyone in any way, and that the
victim is doing a bad thing in claiming his rights, which is why immediately and obsessively the
“psychiatrist” charlatan torturers utter that their victim is “revendicative” meaning claiming rights, for
not being a chemically lobotomized zombie or “a vegetable” as the “psychiatrist” charlatans created a
regime of terror in Romania so that everyone knows this expression with which I’ve been often
threatened my mafia “lawyer” associates for example, that I will be “psychiatrically” incarcerated and
made “a vegetable” to stop denouncing the criminal activity of the mafia
1.20 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie I was “hostile” when as proven in section .A.II.1.3.1^7 of my
ICC penal complaint they were more than hostile, they committed Crimes against humanity against me
1.21 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie I had “a tendency to physical and verbal heteroaggresivity”,
the term “tendency” demonstrating there is no proof of verbal of physical aggresivity from me as before,
this being the mafia’s lie since the second Crimes against humanity attempt that started according to
annex 1 and ended according to annex 3, me proving the mafia falsified another “psychiatric”
charlatanry action against me by annulling the mafia’s falsified “prosecutor’s” falsified “psychiatric”
incarceration proposal, “psychiatric” charlatanry incarceration falsified documents, and the falsified
decision of incarceration from 11224/231/2015 in 1st instance. Clearly this lie by far does not justify
covering-up for the Crimes against humanity committed against me
1.22 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie uttering “irascibility” starting to throw in fill words in the
falsified document to make it appear legitimate
1.23 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie uttering “low tolerance to frustration”, which is false, I have
knowledge of frustration as the term means being stolen from or deprived of. In the criminal culture,
ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 170 of 403

the criminals are accusing their victims of being frustrated with despise, since in a criminal culture
criminals are praised therefore their victims are worthy of despise and should also praise their
aggressors. These are sociopaths as a matter of fact and in short they think everything they do is good
and everything their victims do is bad and disserve being victims if they were, a quite stoic approach to
life philosophy, worthy of dark age animals that in modern age human society are locked in cages, while
even in the dark ages they were often hung if not killed on sight
1.24 the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie that their lies about me being “agitated”, “hostile” and
“revendicative” with “a tendency to physical and verbal heteroaggresivity” meaning I wasn’t “agitated”,
“hostile” at all according to the schizophrenic “psychiatrist” charlatans manifested classically through
logical incoherence and occupational dysfunction according to DSM-V “psychiatric” charlatanry manual
of diagnosis and statistics, because having a “tendency” means no physical behavior can be objectivated
to exist and therefore the schizophrenic “psychiatrist” charlatans are clearly hallucinating since they’ve
also contradicted themselves proving they lie, is a justification to tie me to an operating table and inject
me with deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins putting me in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days
without treatment expecting me to die, lying that they were “monitoring my vital functions from 15 to
15 minutes” when in fact they didn’t make any attempt. The fact there is a procedure for monitoring
vital functions after poisoning with deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins is further proof the fluorine
based poisons especially are deadly as I’ve objectivized anyway in annex 21 and in section A of my ICC
penal complaint. According to article 8 paragraph 1 from norms of application of Romanian Law
487/2002 and article 39 paragraph 1 from the Romanian Law 487/2002, a person can only be deprived
of his liberty of movement through specific methods meaning tied or put in isolation, if there is a real
and concrete danger to his life, his physical integrity or health or of another person. Because I claimed
my right to use my mobile phone according to article 68 paragraph 1 letter b from Romanian Law
487/2002, and the right to keep my clothing according to article 8 paragraph 7 from the norms of
application of Romanian Law 487/2002, evidently those are rights and not a danger to life, bodily
integrity or health of myself or another person, while the “psychiatrist” torturers claimed using my
phone and keeping my clothes is a danger to my life, bodily integrity or health of myself or another
person therefore proved they are schizophrenic because such a claim has no logic, fact which I hold as
proof the schizophrenic “psychiatrist” torturers used this hallucination as a pretext to Torture, Bodily
Harm and attempt Qualified Murder against me by putting me in anaphylactic shock without treatment
for at least 3 days as proven by the blood test as I’ve objectivized in sections A.II.1.3.1^7 and A.I.1-2 of
my ICC penal complaint. According to article 8 paragraph 2 from norms of application of Romanian Law
487/2002 and article 39 paragraph 5 from the Romanian Law 487/2002 the deprivation of liberty is
applied according to the principle of minimal restriction and proportional to the danger level. Because
using my phone and keeping my clothes poses no danger whatsoever as proven by the fact these are
rights, the abuse and breaking of the law and norms was maximal, in accordance with gravity of the
felony of Crimes against humanity committed against me. According to article 37 from the Romanian
Law 487/2002 tying me to an operating table and putting me in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days
without treatment through deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxic poisoning, then forcing me up to 12
days to take other deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxic poisons, constitute the felonies of Subjection
to bad treatment, Torture, Bodily Harm, Qualified Murder attempt and other felonies. I mention
however I am not the only victim of Crimes against humanity as I’ve witnessed a rroma person who was
ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 171 of 403

behaving perfectly normal in the first days I’ve observed him, then one evening he was attacked by the
“psychiatrist” charlatans with no apparent reason, violently tied to a bed and poisoned until the rroma
person was foaming at the mouth. After that day that rroma person was never the same, he became
incoherent from chemical lobotomy. I also witnessed a person being beaten while tied to a bed and
listened to testimonies from the inmates that were hit by the “psychiatrist” torturers in specific ways to
not leave marks such as in the abdomen, and I am sure the “psychiatrist” torturers are sadistic animals
as I’ve observed their behaviour, mocking me while injecting me with the deadly fluorine and chlorine
neurotoxins or reporting I was feeling bad from them when instead of being treated I was immediately
injected with more deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins, or as the illegally self imposed “curator”
“psychiatrist” torturer Barbarosie Carmen after torturing me by forcing me with his “psychiatrist”
assistant torturers to take deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins under threat of being violently
abused as before injected with them anyway, mocked me asking if I felt good being “psychiatrically”
incarcerated and a victim of Crimes against humanity in the Focsani “psychiatric” gulag, or mocked me
telling me to count the seconds knowing life in the Focsani “psychiatric” gulag was worse than in
isolation, having nothing to do than suffer from the poisoning and live in terror of more physical and
psychological abuse, and from the next dose of deadly fluorine and chlorine poisoning witnessing the
destruction of your own brain through chemical lobotomy every second in which you cannot get in
control of oneself and one’s mind and regain security of mind and body, which is torture in itself. The
“psychiatrist” torturers lie about the dosage of Haloperidol and Diazepam because they are hiding the
fact they injected me daily for 3 days with deadly fluorine and chlorine which can be proven by checking
the inventory of the “psychiatry” charlatanry unit which if is found in disarray it means the “psychiatrist”
charlatans are partaking in more covert poisonings than the Crimes against humanity committed
against me in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014, which I’m sure it’s the case given the
mafia’s versatility. The “psychiatrist” charlatans also cannot prove they haven’t injected me with
something else because they lie all the time as proven, and while the shacking from the whole body I
experienced corresponds with the symptoms documented to be caused by Haloperidol deadly fluorine
poison as objectivized in sections A.II.1.3.1^7 and A.I.1-2, also putting me in anaphylactic shock for at
least 3 days is not warranted to have been caused only by Haloperidol, while the fact not only I wasn’t
treated for anaphylactic shock but I was poisoned every time I reported feeling bad, proves beyond any
reasonable doubt the “psychiatric” torturers were going for Qualified Murder, and the Torture and
Bodily Harm were just incidental, all these constituting the Crimes against humanity
1.25 the “psychologist” charlatan lies in the “psychological examination” under Torture from
th
29 May 2017, as proven by declaring without proving anything because it’s impossible to prove lies
1.25.1 that the “psychological examination” under Torture, meaning being in anaphylactic shock
physiologically and post traumatic shock psychologically, is only relevant in the present as declared by
the “psychologist” charlatan, I retain in corroboration as another proof no “psychological” or
“psychiatric” charlatanry “examination” can be relevant about any other day than the day in which the
“examination” meaning the observation takes place, according to “psychiatric” charlatanry rules,
therefore it is proven the “psychiatric” incarceration a year after the false accusations for deeds that
cannot exist physically let alone felonies or premises for diagnosis, is a pretext for the mafia committing
against me Crimes against humanity, as proven in my ICC penal complaint explicitly
ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 172 of 403

1.25.2. that I was a “patient”, which I was not because there wasn’t even a falsified diagnosis
against me at the time, nor was I ever been “expertized” by a “psychiatrist” charlatan to be diagnosed,
and as proof I was never accused of the felonies of False declarations and Inducing the judicial bodies
into error with these declarations which constitutes the proof of verity of my declarations and my
proofs, respectively I wasn’t accused of false declarations by neither of a number of international
institutions that could again as proof of verity of my proven anyway declarations
1.25.3 that I was “aware” contradicts the title of “curator” the “psychiatrist” charlatan torturer
Barbarosie Carmen arrogated on herself to poison me forcefully with deadly fluorine and chlorine
neurotoxins avoiding the convocation of the ethics committee according to article 43 from the
Romanian Law 487/2002 which would’ve legally made the chemical lobotomy impossible or at least it
would’ve created more proofs and revealed more instigators and accomplices in the “psychiatrist”
charlatans members of that committee, respectively the “psychiatrist” charlatan torturer Barbarosie
Carmen refused to close the obligatory conventional representant contract with my mother even I sent
my mother expressly with it, because as conventional representant my mother had the right to oppose
my chemical lobotomization, both facts proving the “psychiatrist” charlatan torturer Barbarosie Carmen
instigated that Crimes against humanity be committed against me beyond any reasonable doubt.
Declaring I was aware also contradicts the “psychiatrist” charlatan recommendation for my “psychiatric”
incarceration in the Focsani gulag for an impossible “examination” without my consent and cooperation,
because the Romanian “state” mafia declared me irresponsible, lacking discernment, being violent and a
public danger, not only not proven but proven to the contrary by me in a lot of ways, being army
incorporable and apt for superior studies according to annex 22, being declared mentally sane ~4 times
by legal work medicine corresponding to my 4 years of legal work with superior studies for which I was
also declared mentally sane, being logical, having witnesses no less from the ranks of the mafia
“psychiatrist” associates etc.
1.25.4 that I was “cooperant” after not giving my consent is not exactly a lie as while I was
tortured the first 3 days I was sufficiently aware to consciously modify my behavior to minimize the
damage caused by my situation, meaning while appearing cooperant was the point while in reality I was
anything but, and it seems that while normally I despise deceit, in dire situations where my life or
physical and psychological integrity are in jeopardy i can practice deceit just fine being convinced I am
doing the right thing, just as the sociopaths always are and are able to deceive even the polygraph test
because of it, which is proof that the “psychiatry” charlatanry can never constitute an objective proof to
any criminal investigation because it’s the sociopaths, the actual criminals who can deceive, making any
“psychiatric” charlatanry “examination” useless in actuality, as the “psychiatric” charlatan’s
hallucinations can only be subjective and constitute no proof in any circumstance as proven here.
1.25.5 that I was “slightly unsettled” and with “generalized anxiety” is a contradiction, because I
couldn’t be generally unsettled and slightly unsettled at the same time, not to mention this is troglodyte
mafia peasant pleonastic speech, typical of the flunkies, the copy-pasting cheaters that come out of so
called Romanian medical colleges with no skill in anything whatsoever, which is why I am able to single
handedly oppose them because numeric superiority and superior power is nothing without the
intelligence to use it. In reality I wasn’t unsettled at all, I was still in anaphylactic shock shacking from the
deadly fluorine and chlorine injections, and unable to control my body therefore my external
appearance wasn’t actually in my control, but I’m sure these expressions are actually fill words to justify
ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 173 of 403

the fakery of the “psychologist” who is also an obvious charlatan mafia associate, who lied by omission
refusing to denounce the Crimes against humanity he knew were committed against me, and while a
normal moral person would’ve resigned immediately, as typical of sociopaths this “psychologist”
charlatan weighed his job against my life meaning put his petty interests above my life which he
sacrificed, which is one of the definition of sociopathic behavior
1.25.6 that I had “selective ’hiperprosexie’ grounded on a juridical theme” when in fact no aspect
of my judicial fight against the Romanian “state” mafia was part of the “psychological examination”
under Torture, or other “examination” between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 strangely but not
really as the “psychiatrist” charlatan torturers all proved they were fully aware they were committing
Crimes against humanity therefore no discussions were necessary. This means the “psychologist”
charlatan lied as instigated by the mafia because this information didn’t come from me but from the
mafia. Furthermore because I was “psychiatrically” incarcerated “on a juridical theme” meaning through
obvious or illegal falsified acts of procedure derived from obvious or illegal falsified penal dossiers, it was
normal thus the “psychiatrist” charlatan retaining such a thing was abnormal, demonstrating logical
incoherence and occupational dysfunction, the symptoms of schizophrenia according to DSM-V
“psychiatry” charlatanry manual of diagnosis and statistics. The “psychiatrist/psychologist” who are
charlatans always throw this fill word I noticed in their fake document, without ever objectivizing, and
because their juridical syllogism is supposed to be based on symptoms to infer a diagnosis, and being
aware is not a symptom of a disease but a characteristic of healthy minded people, it is proven the
“psychologist” charlatan aberrated retaining this, even more so because the Romanian “state” mafia’s
order was to falsify documents that I committed physically impossible deeds without discernment which
is aberrant in itself, but the “psychologist” declaring I was juridically aware “proves” I had juridical
discernment therefore I wasn’t irresponsible and lacking discernment as the mafia lied in its other
falsified documents, which is another proof of the “psychologist” charlatan’s logical incoherence and
occupational dysfunction even as a mafia associate which immediately classifies him as a sociopath as
I’ve demonstrated above anyway and thus corroborate. See paragraph 3.26.8. from annex 4 summary
regarding “hiperprosexie” - it iscopied from the “psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise” falsified in my
absence on 23rd November 2015
1.25.7 see paragraph 3.26.9. from annex 4 summary regarding “hipermnezie” - it is copied from
the “psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise” falsified in my absence on 23rd November 2015
1.25.8 that I had “constant ideative rhythm” means I coherent therefore I was not incoherent as
the “judiciary bodies” lie as proven anyway in paragraph 2.8 from annex 2 summary
1.25.9 that I had “interpretativity” and “tangentiality” in “psychiatric” quackery terminology I
suppose without research that it means I can see an idea from many different perspectives and make
connections between ideas with contradicts the falsified diagnosis of lacking discernment. Since having
intelligence is a good thing and the mention has no place in the premises for a diagnosis as this
“psychologist” charlatan intend to falsify without being caught and failed, I retain this as proof of logical
incoherence and occupational dysfunction even as a charlatan which immediately classifies him as
sociopath not just schizophrenic
1.25.10 that I had “delirant ideas of (penal) pursuit” where delirant means false, I proven 4 penal
dossiers were falsified against me covertly as proven by annex 17 representing my empty judicial history
proving I was never indicted or convicted of anything, that should’ve contained the fact I was under
ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 174 of 403

penal pursuit in falsified dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016. Furthermore it is proven
I was illegally in pursuit by the mafia “secret police” who broke into my mother’s apartment on 13th, 14th
and 27th April 2017, and who arrested me illegally from my law faculty exams, therefore the
“psychiatrist” charlatan lied to cover up for the felonies of the Romanian “state” mafia
1.25.11 that I had “delirant ideas of ... prejudice”, I’ve proven the Romanian “state” mafia
destroyed my first career as an IT programmer through corruption, allowing workplace “mobbing” type
harassment to occur in which I was framed and illegally disciplinarily fired by a gang of sociopaths, which
I’ve annulled and reinstated myself at the same place of work through dossier 43961/3/2009 barely
“winning” my rights after I’ve went to every Romanian “state” mafia “institution” to seek restoration of
my rights, then the gang of sociopaths hired the corrupt “lawyer” firm KINSTELLAR SPARL who falsified
against me 3 more disciplinary sanctions, and bribed the Bucharest Tribunal “judges” who refused to
judge the 2nd illegal disciplinary layoff until the present, knowing I am right and innocent. In short, the
Romanian “state” mafia sold my first career as an IT programmer for bribe from the Delhaize Group.
After I continued to seek justice realizing the whole judiciary system is compromised forming what I
called at the time the “magistrate” mafia, the Romanian “state” mafia realized I know the truth and am
publicly denouncing its criminal activity, and committed the 1st Qualified Murder attempt on 27th
October 2014, the Crimes against humanity from the night between 5th and 6th December 2014, both
involving the mafia instigated and protected interloper Herghelegiu Danut, the to cover these up
committed 5 more Crimes against humanity attempts and the Crimes against humanity between 27th
May 2017 and 8th June 2017, destroying my second career in law in the process by arresting me from my
law faculty exams then returning exactly in the exams session with a falsified indictment proposal to
incarcerate me indefinitely to life, torture and murder me as I’ve objectivized in annex 20, annex 21 and
sections I.B.2-I.B.4 from my ICC penal complaint. My non-pecuniary damages I calculated and
demonstrated being in the rank of billions for which there is the jurisprudence of the “pharmaceutical
company” selling poisons as medicine for which it was fined billions, and I demand equal satisfaction for
having my life destroyed, being tortured and bodily harmed through the poisons of this “pharmaceutical
company”, and having my best years in which I could’ve raised a family or simply enjoyed the experience
of life through my emotional intelligence or with my fully functional mind taken away from me as in
short my life was destroyed by every means the mafia could, and my pecuniary damages are also in the
rank of billions since they represent the costs of cutting-edge medical care I demand to be restored as
close as possible to my initial healthy state, such as use of the stem cell technology, plus all the material
value I lost having my two careers destroyed by the mafia. The “psychiatrist” charlatan lied to cover up
for the felonies of the Romanian “state” mafia
1.25.12 that I had “delirant ideas of ... persecution”, I’ve proven in my ECHR request and ICC
penal complaint the Romanian “state” mafia persecuted me committing state terrorism and political
repression against me making weapons out of the judicial system and the “psychiatry” charlatanry. On
29th May 2017 I had already proven this in my penal complaint also lodged against the “judiciary bodies”
in dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 making them incompatible because no
functionary is legally allowed to cover-up his felonies according to the principle nemo esse iudex in sua
causa potest, made law according to article 11 from the Romanian Government Ordnance 27/2002,
therefore the “psychologist” charlatan knew I was persecuted and lied to cover-up for the mafia who
otherwise instigated him and constitutes another proof the “psychologist” charlatan knew I was
ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 175 of 403

persecuted, as he also knew from the Crimes against humanity committed against me since 27th May
2017 in the Focsani gulag
1.25.13 that I had “aprosodie, deficit de modulare afectiva”, meaning monotonous speech,
making abstraction of the fact I was in anaphylactic shock and shivering from the whole body as this
sadistic “psychologist” charlatan omitted to note, he also lies as I intently modulated my voice to match
my logic during the psychological test which I remind was given before and been declared mentally
healthy, and since I answered identical this is proof enough that the “psychologist” charlatan notes are
lies as I proven anyway
1.25.14 that I had “grafomanie”, meaning pathological tendency to write a lot without sense is
false, firstly because I have written nothing in front of the “psychologist” charlatan, secondly because if I
had written a lot about the mafia without sense the mafia didn’t have a reason to commit Crimes
against humanity against me to stop me from writing about its criminal activity and denounce it
publicly, and thirdly I had an white paper to do in rhetoric discipline in which I scored 90% therefore it is
proven I do not write a lot without sense but I write as much as it makes sense
1.25.15 that I had “hiperbulie(2) legata de materializarea temei delirante(2),comportament
revendicativ la adresa autoritatilor (1), cverulent (3), ostilitate (4), rigiditate (5)”, the “psychologist”
charlatan is clearly covering up for the mafia lying in “layman’s” terms that
1.25.15.1 the mafia’s monopoly on the Romanian “state” makes the mafia the authority which I
do not recognize - all authority derives from morality expressed by the masses in the form of the
constitutional order and rule of law for which the masses issued a mandate of enforcement to the public
functionary body which in Romania is the mafia thanks to the corrupt application of communism by
putting without merit in public function illiterate and immoral peasant who will also form a mafia - this
murderous Romanian regime today is the remnant of communism gone wrong, and is suffocating all
Romanian life as proven by the 3 million Romanian economic refugees as if there is a civil war which
there is, between the Romanian mafia and the Romanian people, and
1.25.15.2 it is false or “delirant” or psychotic of me to believe I have rights according to the
Romanian Constitution and laws which the “psychologist” charlatan declares is the “false theme” of my
hyper concentrated attention or “hiperbulie”, in other words the “psychologist” and “psychiatrist”
charlatans as instigated by the Romanian “state” mafia declaring that obeying the rule of law and living
a honest life being psychosis as they’ve falsely and illegally diagnosed me based on nothing, diagnosis
which is contrary to psychiatric charlatanry literature even who declares a person with utmost
discernment being a citizen who has assimilated the law as his internal social command, therefore the
“psychologist” charlatan demonstrated through this he is schizophrenic, displaying logical incoherence,
occupational dysfunction and failure to recognize what’s real, all symptoms of schizophrenia according
to DSM-V “psychiatric” charlatanry manual of diagnosis and statistics
1.25.15.3 it is wrong or “cverulent” to complain or protest against the crimes of the Romanian
“state” mafia. I would go as far to compare the mentally alienated “psychologist’s “ behavior worthy of
North Koreea’s totalitarianism applauding morons, but in North Koreea you die if you don’t unlike in
Romania where you are just making life harder for yourself, therefore the “psychologist” charlatan is a
classic sociopath sacrificing my life for his career as a charlatan. In a criminal culture meaning where the
criminals run or dominate the society, because the criminals despise their victims they are calling them
“justitiaries” or “cverulent” etc., and that becomes the status quo stigmata on thus ostracized members
ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 176 of 403

of society as these terms rise evidently in the criminal “state” of affairs terminology that is doing the
ostracizing, except in Romania the mafia is clandestine since Romanian is a declared state of right, a
democratic republic under the rule of law, not a mafia “banana country” - with no justice, run by the
mafia’s “secret services” and mafia “magistrate” caporegimes in control of the “police” and
“gendarmes” mafia soldiers, and mafia associated “lawyers”, “legal medics”, “registrars” and other
“functionaries”, “where only the mafia business work” - quote from the infamous Hassan Awdi
1.25.15.4 denouncing the mafia is being hostile to the mafia. The “psychologist” charlatan
admits exercising the right to denounce crime is perceived being hostile to the felons, or that justice
harasses the criminal - an aberration I’ve met since around 2009 when I’ve started fighting for the rule
of law ultimately becoming a human rights defender, and since I’m generally denouncing “public
functionaries” it is intrinsically and statistically proven the Romanian “state” is entirely occupied by the
mafia especially because in man made environment there is no chance therefore no margin of error, if
public functionaries from every sector are corrupt and kept in function it is proven beyond any
reasonable doubt it is that “government’s” intent, and that government is fully corrupt. In fact as the
sociopaths despise their victims calling them frustrated meaning “stolen from” or “thieved”, because in
a criminal culture the criminal is praised and the victims are despised, the same logic applies when
denouncing or “complaining” about the mafia member felonies, the criminals then despising their
victims and calling them “justitiaries” or “cverulent” etc., for the simple fact people in civilized fashion
appeal to the judiciary system for all the crimes committed against them. It is thus proven the
“psychologist” charlatan admits I am exercising my rights against the Romanian “state” mafia , that is
the Romanian government being occupied entirely by organized crime, and that this mafia instigated
him to falsify the “psychological examination” under Torture
1.25.15.5 that is wrong being “rigid” by which the “psychologist” charlatan accuses me of not
being mentally labile or lacking integrity like him which is preposterous and proves again the
“psychiatrist” charlatan is schizophrenic by his symptoms of logical incoherence and occupational
dysfunction according to DSM-V “psychiatry” charlatanry manual of diagnosis and statistics
1.26 the “psychiatrically” irrelevant toxicological examination taken by force or without my
consent demonstrate again the “psychiatrist” charlatans attempts to cover-up the Crimes against
humanity because since I was never indicted and convicted I couldn’t be legally classified as a felon
according to article 109 from the Romanian Penal Code, all the more evident as the deeds I’m accused
of cannot physically exist therefore cannot constitute felonies or premises for a diagnostic or
toxicological examination, which instead proves the mafia associated “psychiatrist” torturers are
schizophrenic troglodyte peasants indeed because they left the proofs in the blood test that they put me
in anaphylactic shock at least in the first 3 days, without treatment, through deadly fluorine and chlorine
neurotoxic injections, which I’ve used to objectivize the Crimes against humanity against me accordingly
in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^7 and I.A.I.1-2 of my ICC penal complaint. There was never a suspicion expressed
according to article 188 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code that I consume drugs
1.27 the blood test proves I was put in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days without treatment
according to the rest of annex 16, demonstrating Crimes against humanity have been premeditated and
committed against me between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017
1.28 The falsified “medical” diagnostics with no “psychiatric” charlatanry significance I remind
were a failed attempt to cover-up the symptoms of the Crimes against humanity against me, the
ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 177 of 403

“treatment” itself being thus unnecessary and a means to infect me as they tried putting a permanent
needle in my arm which is the surest way to get infected in the unhygienic conditions in the Focsani
“psychiatric” gulag or prison, but by the grace of God I managed to stop them by not consenting, worthy
of mention repeatedly, while they were mocking me by marking me like cattle with a ball point pen as if
I didn’t have a choice whether I wanted to be treated for falfisified diagnostics or not which proves the
mentality of the “psychiatrist” charlatans I’ve described before, that is sufficient to be incarcerated in
their gulag and that makes anyone “mentally ill” and their victim to abuse at will. I haven’t researched
the side effects of “Cefort” and “Dexametazona”, while I seem to recall they are antibiotics, with the
known side effect of shutting down the body’s immune system, which would actually expose me to the
unhygienic conditions in the Focsani “psychiatric” gulag or prison diseases, as not all infections are
responding to just any antibiotic, nor have I researched the cumulative effect of anaphylactic shock and
antibiotics, or deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxic poisoning which is also adverse to the body’s
immune system as I’ve objectivized in my ICC penal complaint
1.29 the “psychologist” charlatan lies in the “psychological examination” under Torture from 8th
June 2017, as proven by declaring without proving anything because it’s impossible to prove lies
1.29.1 that I have “medium level intelligence IQ=98”, see paragraph 1.12.4
1.29.2 that I have “capacity to reason and abstract” is in contradiction with the all-time falsified
diagnosis of the mafia “psychiatrist” charlatans that I’m irresponsible, lacking discernment, being violent
and a public danger. Nobody lacking discernment has the capacity to reason at the same time, proving
the “psychologist” charlatan is schizophrenic because it was ordered by the mafia to falsify the report
and as the other “psychologist” charlatan from 29th May 2017 instead it contradicted the mafia
associated “psychiatrist” charlatans
1.29.3 that I have “emotional instability” is an obvious lie. On 8th June 2017 I was already
chemically lobotomized again of any remnant human emotions that my brain compensated for after the
Crimes against humanity committed against me in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014
through a covert deadly fluorine neurotoxic injection as objectivized in sections A.II.1.3.1^7 and A.I.1-2.
As it’s noted in the scientific observation, it takes about 5 days for the deadly fluorine neurotoxin to
destroy the mammalian brain neurons and synapses which are the most susceptible to poisoning, and
8th June 2017 was the 12th day of Torture and Bodily Harm inflicted through both injected and forcefully
oral administered deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins
1.29.3 that I have “low tolerance to frustration” is a lie, and the mafia’s hubris to despise its
victims as I’ve explicated the criminal society dynamic in this regard in paragraphs 1.23 and 1.25.15.4,
and paragraphs 3.22.9 and 3.22.18 from annex 4 summary
1.29.4 that I have “slightly disorganized ideation with ideas of persecution,pursuit” is a lie,
because we never has a discussion for this observation to exist, this “psychiatrist” charlatan being
ironically unable to hide its antisocial personality disorder, meaning it’s a filler proposition for the fake
“psychological” report. This is obviously copied from the other “psychologist” charlatan from 29th May
2017, reason for which I address the same demonstration of the lie at paragraph 1.25.10
1.29.5 that I have “unstable behavior” is a lie meant to cover-up the mafia’s lie about me being
“virtually (as good as) violent” since 2014 after the mafia committed Crimes against humanity against
me, perhaps because they fears I would take revenge which just proves it admits I have a motive and
therefore admits it committed Crimes against humanity against me which I’ve proven anyway. As
ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 178 of 403

further proof of the mafia’s criminal activity, is that while occupying the Romanian judicial system is
unconcerned by the daily beatings and killings taking place all over in Romania which receive no
“psychiatric” charlatanry attention because it’s a weapon of state terrorism and political repression not
justice, as the chaos the mafia creates helps govern the typically stupid Romanian populace through the
principle divide et impera, beatings and killings perpetrated no less than the mafia soldiers in the police
stations where also orgies with minors are performed as the Romanian mafia “police” soldiers especially
are also notoriously pedophiles not just killers, mafia “police” soldiers who are seldom arrested and
even then escape with a ludicrous administrative sanction as I indicate it happened according to the
press in the degenerated “European” Vrancea county where the Crimes against humanity have been
perpetrated against me. My behavior wasn’t observed directly by the “psychologist” charlatan and as
I’ve demonstrated any “psychiatric” charlatanry or psychological observation is only relevant under
observation as objectivized in paragraphs 1.25.1 and 1.14
1.29.6 that I have “apparently ponderate attitude” is proof this “psychologist” charlatan is
schizophrenic as demonstrated by his the symptoms of logical incoherence and occupational
dysfunction objectivized by the fact he contradicted himself with his other lies that I have “unstable
behavior”, “emotional instability”, “low tolerance to frustration”, “emotionally unstable personality”,
according to DSM-V “psychiatry” charlatanry manual of diagnosis and statistics
1.29.7 that I have “emotionally unstable personality configuration with perception disorders” is a
lie as I’ve objectivized in paragraph 1.29.3. The schizophrenic “psychologist” charlatan contradicts
himself declaring afterwards “no cognitive disorders”, which also contradicts all the other mafia
associate “psychiatrists”, “psychologists” and the “prosecutor” and “judge” caporegimes who all lied I’m
irresponsible, lacking discernment, being violent and a public danger
1.29.8 that I have “deficitary interpersonal relations” is a lie because I have superb interpersonal
relations with moral people which are usually the Christians. I just don’t socialize with criminals, junkies
and idiots who comprise the majority of the Romanian population despite being 80% Christian orthodox,
and not socializing with immoral people is a good thing since entourage ruins ones good habits and
creates bad ones. The “psychologist” charlatan never observed my interpersonal relations therefore he
lies saying bad things about me to ingratiate himself with the mafia, point at which I indicate that being
adapted to a “mentally ill” or criminal society is proof of being “mentally ill” or at least accomplice to
criminals
1.29.9 that I have “no cognitive disorders” contradicts all the falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry
documents since 2014, which I did prove falsified therefore this can only be true according to the
principle of non-contradiction especially because an entire army of “psychiatrist” charlatans did its best
to pin their falsified diagnostics on me and failed
1.29.10 that he recommends “psychological counseling” is in contradiction with having “no
cognitive disorders” therefore having no need for “psychological counseling”
1.29.11 that is recommended “affective support” is a meaningless filler expression used by
“psychologist” charlatans as exemplified for the mentally handicapped “judge” Zegrean Augustin from
the Romanian Constitutional Court who I’ve also proven schizophrenic for being logically incoherent and
implicitly occupationally dysfunctional. The mafia making a mentally handicapped person judge is
outrageous, and proves openly my theory that the Romanian “state” mafia hires especially in the
ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 179 of 403

magistrate body schizophrenics because they are psychologically labile or lacking integrity, being easily
instigated into committing crimes for the mafia
1.29.12 that is recommended “pharmacologic support” is in contradiction with having “no
cognitive disorders” therefore having no need for “pharmacologic support”
1.30 the “psychiatric” charlatanry “treatment” “recommendation” as objectivized in annex 21
claims to treat schizophrenia but causes schizophrenia amongst a myriad of other health problems as
expected from a deadly fluorine based neurotoxin, and because I haven’t been diagnosed even falsely
with schizophrenia, the “psychiatric” charlatanry “treatment” is proven to be the continuation of the
intent of the “psychiatrist” torturers to commit Crimes against humanity against me, as risperidone or
paliperidone - risperidone’s metabolite, not only was never objectively proven to cure anyone of
anything, but it killed at least officially tens of people as I objectivized in annex 21. In fact as I’ve
objectivized in my ICC penal complaint, the “psychiatry” charlatanry never cured anyone of anything in
its entire existence, because it’s charlatanry, neither medicine nor science as I’ve objectivized in section
I.A.II.1.2.1 of my ICC penal complaint
1.31 the “psychiatric” charlatanry “recommendation” to avoid conflict and consumption of
neurotoxins is the Romanian “state” mafia’s hubris mocking threat, advising me to stop denouncing its
crimes and thus being in conflict with the mafia’s interests, else I will be poisoned as the
recommendation to avoid the consumption of neurotoxins suggests, since I never consumed
neurotoxins but I was forcefully poisoned with deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins as prove in this
annex 16 summary, and in sections A.II.1.3.1^7 and A.I.1-2 of my ICC penal complaint
1.32 the “psychiatric” charlatanry “recommendation” for psychological counseling is redundant
since I proven the mafia member are schizophrenic and sociopathic for which I recommend life-time
penitentiary “treatment” as necessary for dangerous animals. Talking to one of the more “friendlier”
“psychiatrist” charlatan mafia associates I used against their clique, I was “counseled” to become autistic
and go arrange wares in a French hypermarket for minimum wage, as I’ve been “advised” many times by
mafia members, and this is the place for the rest of society according to the troglodyte peasant mafia’s
vision of society, idiotic docile slaves for them. Since no actual counseling was attempted it is evident no
intent to attend to my psychological health is implied, it’s just a filler line the “psychiatrist” charlatans
escaped in the falsified document.
1.33 the “psychiatric” charlatanry “recommendation” for monitoring the “associated afflictions”
is the proof the “psychiatric” charlatans are very much aware that the deadly fluorine based poison they
tried to kill me covertly with in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014 and openly between 27th
May 2017 and 8th June 2017, produce a myriad of health problems, death included as objectivized in
annex 21 and my ICC penal complaint regarding the fluorine neurotoxin poison in general. Since no
actual treatment was attempted it is evident no intent to attend to my health is implied, it’s just a filler
line the “psychiatrist” charlatans escaped in the falsified document. Even the “psychiatric” charlatanry
general “recommendation” is for simultaneous anti depressant treatment is proof that the deadly
fluorine neurotoxin as I’ve demonstrated induces suicidal or homicidal ideation, and because the
“psychiatrist” torturer Barbarosie Carmen idiotically uttered that “as a professional” does not
recommend anti depressant treatment through a mild and mostly side effect free anti depressant I
proposed, it is proven beyond any reasonable doubt that the mafia intended in case I would survive, to
make me a manic-depressive or “a vegetable”, neither of which evidently worked because becoming an
ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 180 of 403

informatician was not about programming computers only but myself also meaning, amputating my
ability to enjoy life through chemical lobotomization does not make me “a vegetable” because I do not
just do what I like nor did I do what I like most of the time because the life of misery I’ve endured in
Romania. Too bad for the mafia Sigmund Freud was caught taking bribe from two “pharmaceutical
companies” to declare heroine and opium “psychiatric” charlatanry “treatments” because making me a
drug addict would’ve probably worked rather than attempting to make me a manic-depressive, which
wouldn’t’ have occurred to he Romanian Stalinist paranoid peasant mafia as proven by their behavior of
committing the same Crimes against humanity over and over again, as doing the same thing and
expecting different result is by definition being crazy, and crazy people are not aware of being crazy nor
do they change their behavior for being self-aware and become smarter, else they wouldn’t be crazy.
Although apparently I was doing the same thing when fighting the mafia, in actuality I wasn’t - not only I
was improving my methods and multiplying my effort all the time, I was constantly working my way up
the mafia hierarchy and in 2017 before the acts of state terrorism committed against me and my family
right before Orthodox Easter 2017 through home breakings with tens of mafia soldiers “masked
policemen”, “policemen”, “secret policemen” and “gendarmes” in the mafia’s intent to commit Crimes
against humanity against me on Orthodox Easter 2017 which is traditionally the murderous Romanian
regime’s way just like they notoriously assassinated Nicolae Ceausecu and Elena Ceusescu on Orthodox
Christmas following a mock trial which foreboded the incoming decades of injustice in Romania, Crimes
against humanity committed against me as proof between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 as
objectivized in section .A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal complaint, I was planning to write to ECHR
regardless, and I would’ve caught the mafia’s agents posing as ECHR registrars just the same, as my
victory is in fact catching and denouncing all the ramification of the Romanian “state” mafia, destroying
it’s fake image, leveraging to destroy the reputation of corrupt politicians and so on and so forth, aiming
to at least cause the mafia to drop the particular members that personally committed crimes against me
which if it did would’ve been a victory in itself by creating a precedent and showing the mafia members
they are replaceable. It is also possible that an internal faction of the mafia breaks off and overthrows
the old mafia with which I’m at enmity with based on the moral leverage I’m creating. Of course the
factor of the foreign powers is a complex matter I’m abstaining to comment on except the notorious
facts the Romanian “state” mafia was installed with the aid of CIA and whether is CIA’s puppet or
puppetable makes no difference, and EU which is a corporatist conglomerate disguised as a national
conglomerate profits from the Romania “state” mafia regime doing business with it, being obvious that
by throwing the Romanian “dead cat” in EU’s or CoE’s courtyard I can create a whole other level of
leverage attacking foreign corrupt diplomat’s reputations, such as the ones members of the various
committees regarding civil rights and liberties, anticorruption and torture prevention which ignored my
notifications making themselves accomplice to Crimes against humanity. Overthrowing the Romanian
“state” mafia is another battle which I always knew I can’t win alone which is why I attempted as an
overlapped effort with my prior, to create public outrage through internet propaganda that is involve
the Romanians in taking back their country from the mafia, and create dissent within the mafia
concomitantly by leveraging the mafia member’s personal interests which would’ve worked even if only
in part towards my prior goals eventually as proven by the fact the Romanian “state” mafia was making
greater and greater mistakes due to the mental alienation of its members, internet propaganda which
the Stalinist paranoid Romanian “state” mafia grossly overestimated and attacked as proof again of its
ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 181 of 403

mental alienation by censoring my forum “militia.freeforums.net” and partly censoring my


facebook.com account, which because I was going nowhere with it ended up being an unexpected win
because it gave my efforts significance through the mafia’s recognition which was entirely missing
meaning not coming from the idiotic (see Petre Tutea’s famous quote) and cowardly Romanian people,
and rose me to a whole other level by not backing down in face of terrorism, torture and murder,
personally growing me to heights not hoped for through adversity, proving again that truly what does
not kill you makes you stronger. As I stated before, all the mafia was wise to do is refuse the Delhaize
Group bribe, give me my mediocre IT programmer job and let me continue to be an economic slave,
instead of blowing its reputation up out of all proportion through Crimes against humanity with no kind
of profit for the mafia but loss in time and resources, uncovering the psychosis element of the mafia’s
members overinflated egos which if they were the Italian mafia they would’ve been liquidated for sound
business, and uncovering the political ethos of the Romanian “state” mafia who is simply engaged in
totalitarianism - where a minority infringes on the rights of many for domination. Because the Romanian
“state” mafia doesn’ t have any other doctrine than crime, it’s not subsumed to any other political
current being therefore just that, the mafia, a bunch of troglodyte sociopathic peasants destroying
civilization for their personal illicit gain, ganging up for power in numbers and mutual support for
preying on the Romanian people in general, as all sociopaths need victims to justify their power needs
1.34 the “psychiatric” charlatanry “recommendation” for monthly consultation is just a filler line
the “psychiatrist” charlatans escaped in the falsified document as proven by the fact no “psychiatric”
consultation was ever attempted, not even when I requested it after the Crimes against humanity
committed against me in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014 when it was proper to receive
post traumatic counseling which I was denied because the Romanian “state” mafia induced intently
through covert deadly fluorine neurotoxin injection suicidal ideation through chemical lobotomization.
1.35 for the demonstration of the rest of the illegalities committed between 27th May 2017 and
th
8 June 2017 see section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal complaint, which attracts the nullity of all
subsequent acts according to common law as obvious from the infringement of the principle of legality
from which all juridical force flows. For an interesting read also see P.S. from annex 4 summary

In conclusion the “psychiatrist” charlatans broke every relevant law and regulation and falsified
this “psychiatric” charlatanry discharge papers based on no grounds at all as proven above, at the
instigation of the mafia “prosecutor” caporegimes, noting however the “psychiatrist” torturers also had
the motive of covering-up through this falsified paper their own instigation to Crimes against humanity
physically committed by their “psychiatric” charlatanry assistants, which demonstrates their malice
aforethought and obsession of instigating Crimes against humanity against me to which the
“psychiatrist” charlatans are implicitly accomplice, as their falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry
incarceration discharge paper later has been used as instigation to wrongful political repression through
the perpetration of Crimes against humanity attempt to indefinitely incarcerate me to life, torture and
murder me that determined me to become a permanent refugee based on these grounds as I’ve
objectivized in annex 21, Crimes against humanity attempted through the falsified decision in
12718/231/2017 for the crimes and diagnosis of another person named Vasilache Daniel as proven in
annex 19 because I was never indicted, convicted and diagnosed as proven by annex 17 and annex 22, as
the Romanian “state” mafia incrementally assured itself public opinion is dead in Romania and nobody
ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 182 of 403

would be outrages as nobody was for the fact I was illegally deprived of liberty, Tortured, Bodily
Harmed and that Qualified Murder has been attempted against me continuously between 27th May
2017 and 8th June 2017 by being put in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days through deadly fluorine
and chlorine injections without treatment, then after I survived forced to take other deadly fluorine and
chlorine deadly neurotoxins as objectivized in annex 21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal
complaint. These documents are also null because all the falsified acts of procedure in the falsified penal
dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 are null for being started off from a falsified
dossier as I’ve proven in my ICC penal complaint sections I.B.2-I.B.4, according to articled 280-282 from
the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 183 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 16 / ECHR Page 184 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 17 / ECHR Page 185 of 403

Annex 17 inventory, summary demonstration, indicates full demonstration,

1. 1 page, my empty judicial history proves I am innocent and penal dossiers 2417/P/2014,
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 were falsified as a pretext and cover-up story to
commit Crimes against humanity against me. Needless to say being innocent invalidates
without even a demonstration the falsified as proven “psychiatry” charlatanry documents as
demonstrated in annex 4 and annex 16

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, particularly sections I.B.2-I.B.4, I.B.11, I.B.13 and I.B.18 and
preliminary sections 2-4, 11, 13 and 18

In conclusion my empty judicial history is proving I am innocent and penal dossiers


2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 were falsified as a pretext and cover-up
story to commit Crimes against humanity against me as the Romanian “state” mafia incrementally
assured itself public opinion is dead in Romania and nobody would be outrages as nobody was for the
fact I was illegally deprived of liberty, Tortured, Bodily Harmed and that Qualified Murder has been
attempted against me continuously between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 by being put in
anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days through deadly fluorine and chlorine injections without treatment,
then after I survived forced to take other deadly fluorine and chlorine deadly neurotoxins as objectivized
in annex 21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal complaint.
ANNEX 17 / ECHR Page 186 of 403

Generated by CamScanner from intsig.com


ANNEX 18 / ECHR Page 187 of 403

Annex 18 inventory, summary demonstration of falsification, indicates full demonstration,

1. 8 page, falsified ordnance from 1st August 2017 from 2845/P/2016 (united with 3992/P/2016
and 4329/P/2016), and the falsification of the ordnances in rem, in personam and putting into
motion the penal action, as a pretext and instigation to commit Crimes against humanity
against me
2. 4 page, email transcript that I requested all the content of falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 up to 16th November 2016 at least, which the Romanian “state”
mafia “prosecutors” refused

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, particularly section I.B.4 and preliminary section 4

Summary demonstration of the falsification of these documents is as follows:


All juridical acts under the rule of law are only valid if they are a syllogistical inference from a
particular factual premise correlated with an universal law premise. Because all these documents lack
either the factual premise or is falsified, or break the law premise, they are all falsified. In penal matters
the judge must motivate in fact and by right according to article 403 paragraph 1 letters c and d, and the
prosecutor according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code

1. The ordnance from 1st August 2017 from 2845/P/2016 (united with 3992/P/2016 and
4329/P/2016) and the ordnances in rem, in personam and putting into motion the penal action are
falsified because
1.1. all the falsified acts of procedure in the falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016
and 4329/P/2016 are null for being started off from a falsified dossier as I’ve proven in my ICC penal
complaint sections I.B.2-I.B.4, according to articled 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code.
See annex 8, annex 9, annex 17 and annex 18 summaries
1.2. the “prosecutor” refused to administer and objectivize any proof of my innocence or for the
accusation according to article 5, 99, 100 and article 306 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code,
because it’s impossible to prove my guilt because my innocence is evident as it’s reciprocally impossible
to prove the verity of the accusation because the deeds evidently can’t physically exist therefore can’t
constitute felonies or premises for a diagnosis, meaning the falsified penal dossiers are a pretext and
instigation to commit acts of state terrorism and wrongful political repression through Crimes against
humanity against me as proven in section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal complaint especially. Breaking
the law attracts the nullity of the falsified act of procedure and all subsequent acts according to articles
280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1.3. the “prosecutor” refused to motivate the falsified ordnances in rem, in personam and
putting into motion the penal action because it’s impossible according to paragraph 1.2, and refused to
communicate them to hide the paper evidence they aren’t motivated therefore null, communication
which the “prosecutor” was obligated to effectuate according to article 84 letters b, d, e, h, article 94
paragraphs 2 and 8 and article 309 paragraph 3 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code. Because the
ANNEX 18 / ECHR Page 188 of 403

false accusations were declared flagrant, the falsified in rem and in personam ordnances were
unnecessary to be falsified as they were, being summoned at the police station to give declarations
regarding them as judiciary harassment as I’ve been summoned to give the same declarations 3 times in
total, that the ”judiciary” bodies falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016
against me, their motive meaning the cover-up of the falsification of penal dossier 2417/P/2014 and
falsified actions 11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015 as proven to be instigations to Crimes against
humanity, and the motive behind the falsification of 2147/P/2014 and derived falsified actions being the
cover-up of Crimes against humanity committed against me in the night between 5th and 6th December
2014, the Qualified Murder attempt from 27th October 2017, the Crimes against humanity attempted
through 15730/231/2014, the cover-up of the other falsified penal dossiers I opened on the mafia
members for these crimes etc. as all these crimes were meant to or had the motive of stopping me from
denouncing the criminal activity of the Romanian “state” mafia. Breaking the law attracts the nullity of
acts of procedure and the nullity of all subsequent acts according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian
Penal Procedure Code meaning the falsified decisions in 12718/231/2017. Breaking the law attracts the
nullity of the falsified act of procedure and all subsequent acts according to articles 280-282 from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1.4. the “prosecutor” refused consequently to build an indictment and notify the courthouse
because it’s impossible according to paragraph 1.2, admitting intrinsically I’m innocent according to the
principle of non-contradiction and principle of excluded third, article 4 of the Romanian Penal procedure
code, article 23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution, articles 11 and 20 from Romanian
Constitution that makes Romanian ratified international treaties internal right meaning article 11 from
the Universal declaration of human rights and article 6 paragraph 2 from the European convention of
human rights. The “prosecutor” was obligated to effectuate the indictment and send in court according
to articles 327-331 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code. Breaking the law attracts the nullity of the
falsified act of procedure and all subsequent acts according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code
1.5. the “prosecutor” refused to denounce the proven lying accusers for the felonies of False
declarations and Inducing into error the judicial bodies, which I’ve accused legally in the same falsified
dossiers against me along with the “judiciary bodies” that falsified these penal dossiers, reason for
which the “juciary bodies” became incompatible according to the principle nemo esse iudex in sua causa
potest and the Romanian Government Ordnance 27/2002 article 11 which forbids any public servant or
his subordinates from addressing any complaint regarding his activity, and were obligated to forward
the falsified dossiers to the hierarchically superior prosecutor’s office, which they didn’t attracting the
nullity of all their anyway falsified acts of procedure and all subsequent acts according to articles 280-
282 from the Romanian penal Procedure Code
1.6. the “prosecutor” to instigate that Crimes against humanity be committed against me, in
cahoots with various other mafia members, falsified the “psychiatric” charlatanry cover-up story
through the falsification of all acts of procedure to use it as a weapon of state terrorism and wrongful
political repression against me, namely instigating the falsification of the decisions in 4791/231/2017 -
see annex 11 summary, 4909/231/2017 see annex 12 and annex 14 summaries, 1779/91/2017 - see
annex 13 and annex 15 summaries, falsifying the mandates for state terrorism home breakings on 13th,
14th, 27th April 2017 and the mandate that led directly to Crimes against humanity between 27th May
ANNEX 18 / ECHR Page 189 of 403

2017 and 8th June 217 as objectivized in section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 - see annex 16 summary, and the
falsification of the proposal and decisions in 12718/231/2017 - see annex 18-22 summaries, breaking all
relevant laws and regulations in the process namely as exemplificative and most relevant meaning not
an exhaustive listing;
1.6^1 articles 2, 3 (paragraph 1), 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 (paragraph 1, 2 and 5), 11, 14 (paragraph 1),
15, 16 (paragraph 1 letters a, d, h, i), ), 45 (paragraph 1), 56 (paragraph 1), 61, 66, 83 (letters a^1, b, d, e,
h), 88 (paragraph 3), 89, 90 (letter a), 91 (paragraph 2 and 3), 92 (paragraphs 2, 3, 5), 97-100 (paragraph
1, 3), 101 (paragraph 1, 3), 102, 103 (paragraph 1), 104, 108 (paragraph 1), 114 (paragraph 1, 2 letter c),
116, 122 (paragraph 2), 125-128, 130 (paragraph 1), 131-137, 165, 172, 174 (paragraphs 1, 4), 177
(paragraphs 1-5), 178-181, 181^1, 184 (paragraphs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11 letters b, c, d, 12, 15, 20, 23,
27), 188, 190 (paragraphs 1-7, 10-11), 192, 193 (paragraphs 1,2), 194, 197, 198, 257 (paragraphs 1, 5),
258, 259 (paragraph 13), 264 (paragraph 1), 265 (paragraphs 1, 2, 5 letter a, 10, 11, 12), 266 (paragraph
1), 267, 268, 280, 281 (paragraph 1 letters d, 2), 282 (paragraphs 1-4 letter a), 283 (paragraph 1, 3, 4
letter a, d, n), 285 (paragraph 1), 286 (paragraph 2 letters c, d, e), 291, 292, 294 (paragraphs 2-4),
294^1, 298, 299 (paragraph 1), 300 (paragraph 1, 3), 301 (paragraph 3), 303, 304, 305 (paragraphs 1-3),
306 (paragraphs 1, 3-5), 307, 309 (paragraphs 1, 3), 314 (paragraph 1 letter a), 315 (paragraphs 1, 2
letters e, f, 3, 5), 316 (paragraph 1), 317, 320, 321 (paragraphs 1, 2), 322 (paragraph 1), 323, 324
(paragraph 4), 325-328, 329 (paragraph 1, 2), 331, 337-339 and others from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code, mentioning that where the law speaks of other than a “judiciary body’s” obligations I’m
referring to that functionary’s instigation to break the law by the mafia “judiciary bodies” and inherently
their complicity, and that the mafia “judge” is guilty of not denouncing the mafia “prosecutor” and vice
versa therefore breaking whatever law the other broke by complicity, respectively the regulations,
norms, deontology code and logic broke by the mafia “judge” caporegimes I enumerate in paragraph I.3
from annex 23
1.6^2 articles 38, 109 and 278 from the Romanian Penal Code
1.6^3 articles 1 paragraph 5, 11 paragraphs 1-2, 15, 16 paragraphs 1-2, 20, 21 paragraphs 1-3, 22
paragraphs 1-2, 23 paragraphs (1-2, 8, 11-12, 13), 24, 26-28, 29 paragraphs 1-2, 30 paragraphs 1-4, 31,
33-35 paragraphs 1,3, 41 paragraph 1, 43, 45, 47 paragraph 2, 49, 50, 51 paragraphs 1 and 4, 52-55
paragraph 1, 57, 124, 127, 129, 130-132 paragraph 1, 133 paragraph 1, 134 paragraph 2, 139, 142
paragraph 1, 146, 148 paragraph 4, 154 paragraph 1 from the Romanian Constitution,
1.6^4 (may contain extras) articles 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14 and 17 from ECHR,
1.6^5 (may contain extras) articles 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 17, 18, 19, 21 (2), 22, 23, 25, 27, 29
from UDHR,
1.6^6 mafia members who if are not the authors of the felonies are accomplices and instigators
to the breaking of articles 10-17, 20, 24-32, 33 paragraph 5, 34-36 paragraph 3, 37- 39, 41-46, 49, 53- 56
paragraph 2, 57, 58, 60, 61, 63, 65, 67-69, 72 from the Romanian Law 487/2002, articles 19-25, 28, 29,
31-33 from the norms of application of the Romanian Law 487/2002, articles 1, 4 and 5 from annex 2 of
the Romanian Medical Deontology Code, regarding particularities of the activity of the legal medic,
articles 1, 5, 8, 22 letter f and 40 from the Romanian Medical Deontology Code and article 3 from the
Romanian methodological norms regarding the activity of the legal medic in quality of expert named by
the judiciary bodies, point at which the “prosecutor” broke article 172 paragraph 12 from the Romanian
Penal Procedure code regarding the obligation to issue a new expertise (which is impossible to realize to
ANNEX 18 / ECHR Page 190 of 403

start with because “psychiatry” charlatanry is neither medicine nor science as I’ve objectivized in section
I.A.II.1.2.1 of my ICC penal complaint, is charlatanry and the “psychiatrist” charlatan’s hallucinations are
subjective therefore cannot constitute objective proofs in a criminal investigations all the more are
based on the subjective declarations of the “psychiatrist” charlatan’s victim, as demonstrated in section
A of my ICC penal complaint). Furthermore see annex 1-7, 10 summaries regarding the repeated
instigation to Crimes against humanity from 2015 using 2417/P/2014 falsified penal dossier as in 2017
using 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 falsified penal dossiers, mentioning no documents
were communicated to me which is further proof of their nullity for infringing on my right to defend
myself.
1.6^7 Breaking the law attracts the nullity of the falsified act of procedure and all subsequent
acts according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code.
1.8 the “prosecutor” falsified the closing ordnance and of proposing the obligation to medical
treatment from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with 3992/P/2016
and 4329/P/2016) in one ordnance invoking erroneously article 314 paragraph 2 from the Romanian
Penal Procedure Code because this article refers to one ordnance containing both the closing and penal
pursuit renunciation motivation, not both closing and obligation to medical treatment penal matter. In
the case of penal pursuit continuation according to article 305 paragraph 3 from the Romanian Penal
procedure Code or putting into motion the penal pursuit according to article 309 from the Romanian
Penal procedure Code, article 16 paragraph 1 motivations of the Romanian Penal procedure Code
cannot be invoked according to previously mentioned articles, case in which only the renunciation of
penal pursuit can be invoked, reminding that against me there were falsified both the ordnance of
continuation of penal pursuit and the ordnance of putting into motion the penal action, meaning the
only two courses of action the “prosecutors” could take were either notifying the courthouse through an
indictment according to articles 327-331 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, or closing the
falsified penal dossiers with renunciation of penal pursuit according to article 314 paragraph 1 letter b
and paragraph 2 and article 327 letter b, as any penal pursuit ending ordnance must be confirmed in
court of law because it must either end in conviction or acquittal which is the exclusive prerogative of a
judge according to article 1 from the Romanian Law 303/2004 regarding the statute of magistrates,
meaning according to article 318 paragraph 12 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code the
courthouse must be notified to confirm the ordnance of closing and penal pursuit renunciation. Since
the falsified ordnance from 1st August 2017 is neither an indictment nor ordnance of penal pursuit
renunciation, it is illegal, the prosecutor being obligated to motivate all ordnances in fact and by the law
according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code. Breaking the law
attracts the nullity of the falsified act of procedure and all subsequent acts according to articles 280-282
from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1.9 In the case of the proposal for obligation to medical treatment security measure the
courthouse must be notified concomitantly with an indictment against the accused according to article
331 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code regarding the obligation of the prosecution to formulate
an indictment meaning a document containing the administration of proofs and demonstration that the
deeds exist, they constitute felonies and they were committed by the accused according to article 328
paragraph 1 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, and only after the accused is convicted the
proposal for a medical type security measure can be judged obviously since innocents pose no danger
ANNEX 18 / ECHR Page 191 of 403

for security measures to be opposed them, corroborated as relevant to the falsified ordnance from 1st
August 2017 from 2845/P/2016 (united with 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016) with articles 38 and 109
from the Romanian Penal Code regarding the non-punishment clause of irresponsibility and respectively
the obligation to medical treatment where both articles refer to felons meaning convicts not suspects or
the accused who benefit from the presumption of innocence according to article 4 from the Romanian
Penal Procedure Code, article 23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution, article 20 and article 11
from the Romanian Constitution regarding the Romanian international ratified treaties that constitute
internal right, meaning article 6 paragraph 2 from ECHR and article 11 from UDHR, all arguments above
proving the falsification of the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from 2845/P/2016 (united with
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016) and implicitly its nullity according to articles 280-282 from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1.10 the “prosecutor” Lupu Mihai Cristian illegally delegated the policewoman to falsify the acts
of procedure of putting into motion the penal action according to article 324 paragraph 4 of the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code. The “prosecutor” is a coward who did not dare confront me his victim
and appealed even worse as a man to the sociopath mafia “policewoman” Popescu Lacramioara
<1.11 for lack of time I indicate the rest of the demonstration of the falsification of the ordnance
st
from 1 August 2017 from 2845/P/2016(united with 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016), and the
falsification of the ordnances in rem, in personam and putting into motion the penal action, as a pretext
and instigation to commit Crimes against humanity against me, is in section I.B.4 of my ICC penal
complaint
In conclusion the document contained in this annex is a direct instigation and implicitly
complicity to wrongful political repression through the perpetration of Crimes against humanity
attempt to indefinitely incarcerate me to life, torture and murder me that determined me to become a
permanent refugee based on these grounds as I’ve objectivized in annex 21, Crimes against humanity
attempted through the falsified decision in 12718/231/2017 for the crimes and diagnosis of another
person named Vasilache Daniel as proven in annex 19 because I was never indicted, convicted and
diagnosed as proven by annex 17 and annex 22, as the Romanian “state” mafia incrementally assured
itself public opinion is dead in Romania and nobody would be outrages as nobody was for the fact I was
illegally deprived of liberty, Tortured, Bodily Harmed and that Qualified Murder has been attempted
against me continuously between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 by being put in anaphylactic shock
for at least 3 days through deadly fluorine and chlorine injections without treatment, then after I
survived forced to take other deadly fluorine and chlorine deadly neurotoxins as objectivized in annex
21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal complaint. These documents are also null because all the
falsified acts of procedure in the falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016
are null for being started off from a falsified dossier as I’ve proven in my ICC penal complaint sections
I.B.2-I.B.4, according to articled 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
ANNEX 18 / ECHR Page 192 of 403

Scanned by CamScanner
ANNEX 18 / ECHR Page 193 of 403

Scanned by CamScanner
ANNEX 18 / ECHR Page 194 of 403

Scanned by CamScanner
ANNEX 18 / ECHR Page 195 of 403

Scanned by CamScanner
ANNEX 18 / ECHR Page 196 of 403

Scanned by CamScanner
ANNEX 18 / ECHR Page 197 of 403

Scanned by CamScanner
ANNEX 18 / ECHR Page 198 of 403

Scanned by CamScanner
ANNEX 18 / ECHR Page 199 of 403

Scanned by CamScanner
ANNEX 18 / ECHR Page 200 of 403

Tudor Raneti

From: Tudor Raneti <tudor.raneti@gmail.com>


Sent: 13 septembrie 2016 06:44
To: pj_focsani@mpublic.ro
Subject: MEMORIU DESCHIS PUBLICULUI ADRESAT D-LUI PETRESCU AURAS IONUT PRIVIND
REFUZUL DE A SOLUTIONA CEREREA DE COMUNICAREA INSCRISURILOR DIN
2845/P/2016 IN FOTOCOPIE SCANATA

Raneti Tudor Andrei, domiciliat in Bucuresti bd. Theodor Pallady, nr. 2, bl. M2A, sc. B, et. 6, apt. 61, sectorul 3, unde nu 
locuiesc din 2009, identificat cu B.I./C.I. seria RT nr. 654712 emis de SPCEP S3 biroul nr. 4 la data de 04.09.2009 si avand 
C.N.P. 1801010394508, cu adresa de corespondenta electronica aleasa pentru comunicarea actelor de procedura cf. 
art. 155 (1) 6. din CPC “...la locul ales de ele...” si art. 158 (2) din CPC modificat si completat prin Legea 202/2010 
“Partea poate alege ca toate actele de procedura sa ii fie comunicate la casuta postala”: tudor.raneti@gmail.com, 
 
Va aduc la cunostinta urmatoarele: 
 
1. am formulat cerere de fotocopierea inscrisurilor determinante din dosarul 2845/P/2016 adica a ordonantelor si 
probelor inscrisuri cum ar fi declaratiile subiectilor procesuali, prin emailul din data de 20 iunie 2016 08:39 intitulat “FW: 
CERERE DE CONSULTAREA DOSARULUI 2845/P/2016 SI COMUNICARE SCANATA A INSCRISURILOR DIN 2845/P/2016 IN 
TEMEIUL DREPTULUI DE CONSULTAREA DOSARULUI” adresat la pj_focsani@mpublic.ro; cabinet@vn.politiaromana.ro, 
avand acest drept cf. art. 94 (2) din CPP “Consultarea dosarului presupune dreptul de a studia actele acestuia, dreptul de 
a nota date sau informatii din dosar, precum si de a obtine fotocopii pe cheltuiala clientului” cu mentiunea ca fotocopiile 
scanate communicate la o adreas de corespondenta electronica nu ridica nici un cost 
 
2. pana in prezent nu mi s‐a raspuns la aceasta cerere incalcandu‐se termenul de 30 de zile cf. art. 8 din OUG 27/2002 de 
peste 2 (doua) ori, si incalcandu‐mi‐se dreptul la aparare prin acesta precum si dreptul la un proces echitabil intr‐un 
termen rezonabil 
 
3. deoarece sunteti prim‐procurorul Parchetului de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani din 15.07.2016 sunteti responsabil 
pentru solutionarea acestei cereri la termen si in mod legal cf. art. 4 din OUG 27/2002, insa fiindca sunteti nou in post 
va acord pana la sfarsitul saptamanii sa emiteti cel putin un ordin de comunicarea inscrisurilor din 2845/P/2016 in 
fotocopie scanata, pe care sa mi‐l comunicati in copie pentru a lua cunostinta ca nu cooperati cu crima organizata din 
Focsani, altfel in apararea drepturilor mele legitime voi fi obligat sa va inculp in acelasi dosar penal pentru 
complicitatea la falsificarea acestui dosar penal impotriva mea, precum au fost falsificate dealtfel si 2417/P/2014, 
3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 daca prin absurd nu stiati cu ce se ocupa grupul infractional al asa‐ziselor organe 
judiciare din circumscriptia Curtii de apel Galati. Prezenta constituie dovada ca ati luat la cunostinta de existenta 
cererii mele indicata la punctul 1 
 
4. deasemenea daca aceasta situatie ilicita a faptului ca procurorii de la Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani 
persista voi fi obligat sa va inculp deoarece ordonantele de inceperea urmaririi penale din 21.07.2016 din 3992/P/2016 si 
de continuarea urmaririi penale din 07.09.2016 din 3992/P/2016, au fost falsficate de catre asa‐zisul politist Popescu 
Lacramioara, si au fost aprobate de Lupu Mihai Cristian sub conducerea dumneavoastra, fiind responsabil cf. art. 132 din 
CR si art. 4 din OUG 27/2002 de legalitatea solutiilor subordonatilor dumneavoastra. 
 
Aceasta deasemenea constituie proba ca ati luat la cunostinta situatia din subordinea dumneavoastra, iar daca aveti 
nevoie de dovezi va aduc la cunostinta ca le‐am facut publice odata cu dosarul de punerea sub interdictie pentru 
schizofrenie a asa‐zisului procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian, asa‐zisul politist Popescu Lacramioara si altii la adresa: 
http://militia.freeforums.net/thread/61/interzis‐schizofrenic‐popescu‐lacramioara‐2845 
urmand a actualiza aceasta discretionar 

1
ANNEX 18 / ECHR Page 201 of 403

Tudor Raneti

From: Tudor Raneti <tudor.raneti@gmail.com>


Sent: 16 noiembrie 2016 08:47
To: 'pj_focsani@mpublic.ro'; 'cabinet@vn.politiaromana.ro'
Subject: FW: CERERE #1-3 DE CONSULTAREA DOSARULUI 2845/P/2016 SI COMUNICARE
SCANATA A INSCRISURILOR DIN 2845/P/2016 IN TEMEIUL DREPTULUI DE
CONSULTAREA DOSARULUI
Attachments: cerere #1-3 de comunicare a inscrisurilor scanate din dosar.pdf

Tracking
Tracking: Recipient Read

'pj_focsani@mpublic.ro'

'cabinet@vn.politiaromana.ro' Read: 16.11.2016 13:30

N‐ati raspuns la solicitarea de comunicarea in fotocopie a inscrisurilor din dosar 
 
 
 
From: Tudor Raneti [mailto:tudor.raneti@gmail.com]  
Sent: 12 septembrie 2016 10:01 
To: pj_focsani@mpublic.ro; cabinet@vn.politiaromana.ro 
Subject: FW: CERERE DE CONSULTAREA DOSARULUI 2845/P/2016 SI COMUNICARE SCANATA A INSCRISURILOR DIN 
2845/P/2016 IN TEMEIUL DREPTULUI DE CONSULTAREA DOSARULUI 
 
N‐ati raspuns la solicitarea de comunicarea in fotocopie a inscrisurilor din dosar 
 
 
 
From: Tudor Raneti [mailto:tudor.raneti@gmail.com]  
Sent: 20 iunie 2016 08:39 
To: pj_focsani@mpublic.ro; cabinet@vn.politiaromana.ro 
Subject: CERERE DE CONSULTAREA DOSARULUI 2845/P/2016 SI COMUNICARE SCANATA A INSCRISURILOR DIN 
2845/P/2016 IN TEMEIUL DREPTULUI DE CONSULTAREA DOSARULUI 
 
 

1
ANNEX 18 / ECHR Page 202 of 403

Catre Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani, Inspectoratul de politie a judetului Vrancea


Dosar 2845/P/2016

Domnule prim-procuror, domnule comisar sef

subsemnatul Raneti Tudor Andrei , domiciliat in Bucuresti bd. Theodor Pallady nr. 2, bl. M2A, sc.
B, et. 6, apt. 61, sectorul 3, unde nu locuiesc din 2009, identificat cu B.I./C.I. seria RT nr. 654712 emis de
SPCEP S3 biroul nr. 4 la data de 04.09.2009 si avand C.N.P. 1801010394508, cu adresa de
corespondenta electronica aleasa cf. art. 257 (5), art. 259 (1) si art. 289 (5) din CPP modificat si
completat prin OUG nr. 3/2014: tudor.raneti@gmail.com,

formulez cf. art. 78, art. 83 b) si art. 94 (2-3)(8) din CPP prezenta

CERERE
prin care

I. In fapt,

1. solicit in temeiul dreptului de a consulta dosarul cf. art. 83 b) din CPP explicitat cf. art. 94 (2)
din CPP in privinta dreptului de a obtine fotocopii din dosar, sa-mi comunicati scanate prin posta
electronica la adresa de corespondenta aleasa: tudor.raneti@gmail.com urmatoarele inscrisuri:
1.1. declaratiile partilor si subiectilor procesuali din dosar inclusiv cea depusa de mine pe data
de 02.06.2016 cu ocazia audierii in calitate de martor
1.2. ordonanta de inceperea urmaririi penale
1.3. ordonanta de continuarea urmaririi penale
1.4. referatul organului de cercetare penala cu propunerea de continuarea urmaririi penale
1.5. orice alte inscrisuri cu caracter determinant din dosar cu exceptia celor pe care vi le-am
trimis eu prin posta electronica deoarece evident sunt in posesia acestora deja

2. solicit acordarea dreptului de a consulta dosarul indiferent pentru a controla inventarul


acestuia, cu mentiunea ca asa-zisul organ de cercetare penala Popescu Lacramioara in raspuns la
cererea verbala din 02.06.2016 de consultarea dosarului care se afla la dansa pe masa fiindca a audiat

Pagina 1 din 2
ANNEX 18 / ECHR Page 203 of 403

pe jandarmi precum mi s-a comunicat, a mintit ca nu are dosarul si ca trebuie sa depun cerere de
consultarea dosarului la procuror contrazicandu-se cu art. 94 (3) din CPP deoarece procurorul i-a delegat
cercetarea penala si toate obligatiile ce decurg din aceasta

II. De drept,
cf. art. 78, art. 83 b) si art. 94 (2)(8) din CPP

Cod de procedura penala


Art. 78 - Drepturile suspectului
Suspectul are drepturile prevazute de lege pentru inculpat, daca legea nu prevede altfel.

Cod de procedura penala


Art. 83 - Drepturile inculpatului
b) dreptul de a consulta dosarul, in conditiile legii;

Cod de procedura penala


Art. 94 - Consultarea dosarului
(2) Consultarea dosarului presupune dreptul de a studia actele acestuia, dreptul de a nota date sau
informatii din dosar, precum si de a obtine fotocopii pe cheltuiala clientului.
(3) In cursul urmaririi penale, procurorul stabileste data si durata consultarii intr-un termen rezonabil.
Acest drept poate fi delegat organului de cercetare penala.
(8) Dispozitiile prezentului articol se aplica in mod corespunzator cu privire la dreptul partilor si al
subiectilor procesuali principali de a consulta dosarul.

Cu mentiunea ca scanarea si comunicarea prin posta electronica nu ridcia costuri de copiere

20.06.2016

X
Raneti Tudor Andrei

Signed by: Raneti Tudor Andrei

Conform Legea 455/2001 privind semnatura electronica si


DIRECTIVA 1999/93/CE A PARLAMENTULUI EUROPEAN ȘI A
CONSILIULUI din 13 decembrie 1999 privind un cadru
comunitar pentru semnăturile electronice

Domnului prim procuror al Parchetului de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani,


domnului comisar sef de politie de la Politia Focsani
Pagina 2 din 2
ANNEX 19 / ECHR Page 204 of 403

Annex 19 inventory, summary demonstration of falsification, indicates full demonstration,

1. 8 pages, falsified decision from 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance constituting the instigation to
commit Crimes against humanity against me for the crimes and diagnosis of a person named
Vasilache Daniel because I was never indicted, convicted and diagnosed
2. 4 pages, falsified decision from 12718/231/2017 in 2nd instance constituting the instigation to
commit Crimes against humanity against me using the annulled “psychiatric” charlatanry
documents in 14277/231/2015 1st and 2nd instance which is in ne bis in idem with
12718/231/2017 because I am falsely accused identically of fictive deeds that are physically
impossible to exist let alone constitute felonies or premises for diagnostics, and being
irresponsible, lacking discernment, being violent and a public danger, already proven false
3. 1 page, proof of communication of falsified decision from 12718/231/2017 in 2nd instance on
20th February 2018

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, particularly sections I.B.2 and I.B.3 and preliminary sections 2 and 3

Summary demonstration of the falsification of these documents is as follows:


All juridical acts under the rule of law are only valid if they are a syllogistical inference from a
particular factual premise correlated with an universal law premise. Because all these documents lack
either the factual premise or is falsified, or break the law premise, they are all falsified. In penal matters
the judge must motivate in fact and by right according to article 403 paragraph 1 letters c and d, and the
prosecutor according to article 286 paragraph 2 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1. The decision from 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance is falsified because
1.1. see chapter 1 from annex 18 summary. Because the falsified acts and law breakings were
repeated in the falsified decisions in 12718/231/2017, it attracts the nullity of the falsified decisions in
12718/231/2017 and all subsequent acts according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code
1.2. "judge" Miron Doina did not motivate the falsified decision in 12718/231/2017 in 1st
according to article 403 paragraph 1 letters c and d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code as proven
by the facts that
1.2.1 instead of a veridical factual particular premise "judge" Miron Doina hallucinated that I
must be sentenced for the crimes and diagnosis of a person named Vasilache Daniel because I was never
indicted, convicted or diagnosed, being obviously innocent not only according to article 4 of the
Romanian Penal procedure code, article 23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution, articles 11
and 20 from Romanian Constitution that makes Romanian ratified international treaties internal right
meaning article 11 from the Universal declaration of human rights and article 6 paragraph 2 from the
European convention of human rights, but also obviously being accused of deeds that cannot physically
exist therefore cannot constitute felonies or premises for diagnostics as objectivized in sections I.B.2-
I.B.4 of my ICC penal complaint and in annex 8 and annex 9 summaries, and as proven by the simple fact
the “judiciary bodies” admit I am innocent by refusing to administer any proof and build an indictment.
ANNEX 19 / ECHR Page 205 of 403

Furthermore "judge" Miron Doina invoked a falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise” falsified in my
absence on the supposed date of 9th December 2016 which is illegal according to article 10 from the
Romanian Law 487/2002 attracting the nullity of the document that can only be falsified as I’ve
demonstrated the other “psychiatric” charlatanry documents that I managed to obtain were as proven
in annex 4 and annex 16, respectively
1.2.2 instead of a law universal premise correspondent to a decision of annulment of the
falsified “prosecutor’s” proposal, "judge" Miron Doina invoked articles 38 and 109 from the Romanian
Penal Code against me which are only applicable on convicts not the accused, reminding that I was
never indicted and convicted as proven by annex 17, annex 18 and annex 19, and since the falsified
penal dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 were closed even illegally before the trial in
12718/231/2017, technically I didn’t even have the falsified quality of accused anymore as proven by
the “prosecutor’s” falsified appeal “motivation” against 14277/231/2015 in 1st instance attached as
annex 7 proving this identical situations occurred in 14277/231/2015 and the falsified “prosecutor’s”
proposal having the same object was rejected as inadmissible, also because that falsified proposal’s
arguments were already rejected in 11224/231/2015 causing an even older ne bis in idem situation with
12718/231/2017
1.2^1 In conclusion "judge" Miron Doina refused to motivate in fact and by right the falsified
decision from 12718/231/2017 because it’s impossible, particularly because no physical deeds that can
constitute felonies or are even immoral are proven to exist in the falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 because they cannot physically exist let alone constitute felonies or
premises for diagnostics, as I’ve objectivized in sections I.B.2-I.B.4 from my ICC Penal Complaint, and in
annex 8 summary, that listening on audio books on earphones cannot physically disturb anyone else and
is not a felony even ad absurdum it could, that is physically impossible to make audio/video recordings
with earphones nor is it necessary with the mobile phone since the courthouse meeting is recorded by
default and the recording is available to anyone, especially the parties as I’ve obtained it and accused
the mafia with it proving my innocence, nor is this even ad absurdum a felony, respectively the mafia
sends the falsified document proofs by post, email or are available in the courthouse archive, that is
impossible to commit obscene gestures and utter obscene words the accusers and the witness declare
they never saw or heard as objectively corroborated with the audio/video recording of the courthouse,
and that is impossible to commit a felony by pleading in defense of my rights as particularly proven in
annex 9 summary
1.3. "judge" Miron Doina refused to denounce the falsification of all the acts of procedure in
penal dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 according to articles 61 and 291 from the
Romanian Penal Code, which makes "judge" Miron Doina incompatible to judge or be a judge according
to article 64 paragraph 1 letter f from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code because the paramount
condition to be a judge is to exclusively obey the law according to article 124 paragraph 3 from the
Romanian Constitution, for being accomplice to and instigating Crimes against humanity be committed
against me as he did through the falsification of the decision in 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance as
objectivized in section A of my ICC penal complaint, annex 20 and annex 21 representing my plead in
12718/231/2017 respectively my proven grounds to fear indefinite incarceration to life, Torture, Bodily
Harm and Qualified Murder which determined me to become a permanent refugee from the
murderous totalitarian Romanian “state” mafia regime. As further proof of “judge” Miron Doina
ANNEX 19 / ECHR Page 206 of 403

instigation to Crimes against humanity he used the Romanian term “medicamentos” meaning drugging,
as there are “treatments” which don’t use drugging such as therapy and counseling, therefore it is
proven beyond any reasonable doubt the murderous intent of the Romanian “state” mafia as
objectivized in annex 21 and section A of my ICC penal complaint
1.4. "judge" Miron Doina and all the members of the “psychiatry” charlatanry committee were
incompatible for lacking impartiality according to articles 64 paragraph 1 letter f, such as “judge” Miron
Doina being accomplice and instigating to the Crimes against humanity attempts committed through
the falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 and derived falsified actions 10547/231/2015, 11224/231/2015
and 14277/231/2015 and other falsified acts of procedure as proven by annex 1-10, by falsifying the
decision of Crimes against humanity attempts cover-up in dossier 1560/231/2016 for which I opened a
penal dossier against him in which he was never acquitted, respectively the psychiatry” charlatanry
committee members are all accused in penal dossiers for instigating Crimes against humanity against
me before and have never being acquitted, nor were the malpraxis complaints I opened against them
ever closed, remaining to determine which actively took part in the Crimes against humanity
perpetrated against me in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014 by choosing the poison and
falsifying documents to steal it from the inventory. All these multiple accounts of incompatibility attracts
the nullity of all his falsified acts of procedure from 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance according to article
280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, and all subsequent acts meaning 12718/231/2017 in
2nd instance
1.5. "judge" Miron Doina broke the ne bis in idem principle existant between 12718/231/2017
and 14277/231/2015, because I was accused in all falsified penal dossiers against me identically of
fictive deeds which cannot physically exist let alone constitute penal offences or premises for
diagnostics, therefore according to doctrine, no deed, in my case fictive meaning the same accusation,
can be judged twice under a new penal classification as proven in this Romanian specialty article:
http://legeaz.net/dictionar-juridic/autoritate-lucru-judeact-hotarari-penale, and I prove the three
conditions for ne bis in idem as follows: the decision in 14277/231/2015 in 2nd instance is definitive as
proven by annex 10, I (eadem personae) have been attacked with another falsified penal action with the
same object as in 14277/231/2015 in 12718/231/2017 proven in annex 10 and annex 19, and, I’ve been
accused identically with a fictive deed which cannot be proven it’s another deed because it doesn’t exist
and cannot physically exist therefore the fictive accusation being identical (idem factum), and accused
identically of being irresponsible, lacking discernment and being violent without any proof or even a
falsified document presented in this regard, proven by annex 17 regarding my empty judicial history
meaning never indicted or convicted, where an indictment would contain the administration and
objectivization of proofs which never existed because the “judiciary bodies” refused to administer any
proofs at all, mine or the Romanian “state” mafia’s. If the authority of an already judged fact does not
exist because there’s no definitive decision of conviction following an indictment, it stands proof then in
corroboration I am innocent according to the presumption of innocence according to article 4 from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code and article 23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution, articles
11 and 20 from Romanian Constitution that makes Romanian ratified international treaties internal right
meaning article 11 from the UDHR and article 6 paragraph 2 from the ECHR, meaning articles 38 and 109
from the Romanian Penal Code regarding the non-punishment clause of irresponsibility and security
measures respectively cannot be invoked against me because it refers to convicts not the suspect or the
ANNEX 19 / ECHR Page 207 of 403

accused, reminding I proven in section I.A.II.1.2.10^1 of my ICC penal complaint that the “psychiatric”
charlatanry poisoning do not constitute a measure of security but on the contrary creates suicidal and
even worse homicidal ideation
<1.6. for lack of time I indicate the rest of the demonstration of the falsification of the decision
in 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance, as a pretext and instigation to commit Crimes against humanity
against me, is in section I.B.3 of my ICC penal complaint
1.7 the laws, regulations, norms, deontology code and logic broke by the mafia “judge”
caporegimes I enumerate in paragraph I.3 from annex 23
2. The decision from 12718/231/2017 in 2nd instance is falsified because
2.1. see chapter 1 because “judge” Badiu Mandica repeated the felonies of “judge” Miron Doina
2.2. furthermore “judge” Badiu Mandica invoked the annulled “psyhiatry” charlatanry
documents from 14277/231/2015 in 1st and 2nd instance, mentioning the falsified arguments were
actually annulled before in 11224/231/2015 creating an even older ne bis in idem situation with
12718/231/2017, proving again there are no valid “psychiatric” charlatanry documents against me and
as I declared responsibly knowing the consequences of the felony of False declarations, I was never
“examined” by a “psychiatrist” charlatan or committee of charlatans for an “expertise” to exist, nor have
I ever given my consent except naively during the army incorporation exam perhaps when I was
declared mentally healthy as proven by annex 22. Even more “judge” Badiu Mandica annulled in person
the action 14277/231/2015 in 1st instance as inadmissible being no doubt he knew the “psychiatric”
charlatanry documents were illegal, groundless, self-contradictory, syllogistically invalid as I’ve
demonstrated in annex 4, null of right and annulled in 14277/231/2015
2.3. the laws, regulations, norms, deontology code and logic broke by the mafia “judge”
caporegimes I enumerate in paragraph I.3 from annex 23
<2.4. for lack of time I indicate the rest of the demonstration of the falsification of the decision
in 12718/231/2017 in 2nd instance, as a pretext and instigation to commit Crimes against humanity
against me, is in section I.B.2 of my ICC penal complaint
In conclusion the document contained in this annex is a direct instigation and implicitly
complicity to wrongful political repression through the perpetration of Crimes against humanity
attempt to indefinitely incarcerate me to life, torture and murder me that determined me to become a
permanent refugee based on these grounds as I’ve objectivized in annex 21, Crimes against humanity
attempted through the falsified decision in 12718/231/2017 for the crimes and diagnosis of another
person named Vasilache Daniel as proven in annex 19 because I was never indicted, convicted and
diagnosed as proven by annex 17 and annex 22, as the Romanian “state” mafia incrementally assured
itself public opinion is dead in Romania and nobody would be outrages as nobody was for the fact I was
illegally deprived of liberty, Tortured, Bodily Harmed and that Qualified Murder has been attempted
against me continuously between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 by being put in anaphylactic shock
for at least 3 days through deadly fluorine and chlorine injections without treatment, then after I
survived forced to take other deadly fluorine and chlorine deadly neurotoxins as objectivized in annex
21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal complaint. These documents are also null because all the
falsified acts of procedure in the falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016
are null for being started off from a falsified dossier as I’ve proven in my ICC penal complaint sections
I.B.2-I.B.4, according to articled 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
ANNEX 19 / ECHR Page 208 of 403
ANNEX 19 / ECHR Page 209 of 403
ANNEX 19 / ECHR Page 210 of 403
ANNEX 19 / ECHR Page 211 of 403
ANNEX 19 / ECHR Page 212 of 403
ANNEX 19 / ECHR Page 213 of 403
ANNEX 19 / ECHR Page 214 of 403
ANNEX 19 / ECHR Page 215 of 403
ANNEX 19 / ECHR Page 216 of 403

Dosar nr. 12718/231/2017


ROMÂNIA
TRIBUNALUL VRANCEA
SECŢIA PENALĂ
ÎNCHEIERE
Şedinţa din camera de consiliu de la 02.02.2018
Instanţa constituită din:
Judecător de cameră preliminară: Măndica Badiu
Grefier: Luminiţa Mioara Haiduc

MINISTERUL PUBLIC – Parchetul de pe lângă Tribunalul Vrancea a fost reprezentat de


procuror Peicu Daniela

Pe rol soluţionarea contestaţiei formulată de contestatorul - Raneti Tudor Andrei,


domiciliat în București, Bd. Theodor Pallady, nr.2, bl. M2A, sc.B, et.6, ap.61, sect.3, cu adresă
de corespondență electronică aleasă tudor.raneti@gmail.com, împotriva încheierii pronunţata de
Judecătoria Focşani la data de 11.10.2017, in dosarul 12718/231/2017.
La apelul nominal făcut în şedinţa din camera de consiliu, a răspuns pentru contestatorul
Raneti Tudor Andrei d-ul avocat din oficiu Miron Adrian, care depune delegaţie pentru asistenţă
judiciară obligatorie din oficiu nr. 154/25.01.2018
Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.
S-a făcut referatul cauzei de către grefierul de şedinţă, care evidenţiază părţile, obiectul
cauzei şi modalitatea de îndeplinire a procedurii de citare, după care;
D-ul av. Miron Adrian si reprezentantul Ministerului Public, având cuvântul, arată că
nu au alte cereri de formulat.
Nemaifiind alte cereri, judecătorul de Cameră Preliminară acordă cuvântul în
susţinerea contestaţiei.
Apărătorul din oficiu al contestatorului-inculpat, având cuvântul, arată că contestatorul
a formulat aceasta cerere legat de situaţia sa medicală, contestând faptul că cei care au făcut si
au stabilit ca se face bolnav nu a avut in vedere unele aspecte. Mai arata ca a observat ca a fost o
comisie care a stabilit exact situaţia acestuia medicala, si fata de tulburările pe care acesta le
avea exista posibilitatea sa fie internat intr-o unitate medicala. Din punctul sau de vedere
considera ca în urma controlului si a verificărilor făcute, medicale, că pacientul, contestatorul
trebuie sa fie internat intr-un centru medical pentru ca situaţia sa să nu mai pericliteze
activităţile care sunt uzuale. Apreciază ca fata de documentele existente la dosar contestatorului
iar prinde bine aceasta măsura.
Reprezentantul Ministerului Public, având cuvântul, arata ca s-a formulat contestaţie
de câtre contestatorul Tudor Andrei, contestaţie formulată în termen. Mai arata ca s-a admis de
câtre Judecătoria Focşani cererea de luare a masuri de siguranţa constând în tratament medical.
Mai arată că la luarea acestei masuri s-a avut in vedere actele aflate la dosarul cauzei, inclusiv
raportul de expertiza medico legal, prin care s-a ajuns la concluzia ca se impune luarea acestei
masuri. Susţine ca au fost acordate mai multe termen, la solicitarea mamei contestatorului , la
cererea apărătorului care a renunţat sa vina sa îl mai reprezinte, astfel încât, neapărând alte
elemente care sa determine reanalizarea situaţia din aceasta cauza, considerând ca această
contestaţie nu este întemeiata, sens în care solicita respingerea acestei contestaţii, urmând sa se
ANNEX 19 / ECHR Page 217 of 403

procedeze potrivit art. 566 Cod procedura penală cu privire la hotărârea definitiva prin care se
dispune o astfel de măsura.
Judecătorul de cameră preliminară, rămâne în pronunţare.

JUDECĂTORUL DE CAMERĂ PRELIMINARĂ

Asupra contestaţiei penale de faţă;


Prin cererea înregistrată pe rolul Tribunalului Vrancea la data de 23.11.2017
contestatorul-inculpat Raneti Tudor Andrei, domiciliat în București, Bd. Theodor Pallady, nr.2,
bl. M2A, sc. B, et.6, ap.61, sect.3, a formulat contestaţie împotriva Încheierii din data de
11.10.2017, pronunţată de Judecătoria Focşani în dosarul penal nr. 12718/231/2017, prin care a
fost admisa cererea formulată de PARCHETUL DE PE LÂNGĂ JUDECĂTORIA FOCŞANI,
având ca obiect luarea măsurii de siguranţă a obligării la tratament medical si în consecinţă
contestatorul a fost la tratament medical, până la însănătoşire sau până la ameliorarea stării de
sănătate.
In motivarea contestaţiei contestatorul a arătat ca a fost cercetat in trei dosare de
urmărire penală, însă nu s-a stabilit vinovăţia sa, dar nici împrejurarea ca fapte pentru care a fost
cercetat există.
Contestatorul a arătat ca in aceste condiţii nu poate fi obligat la un tratament psihiatric
întrucât nu s-a stabilit ca a comis o infracţiune si nici ca exista pericolul de a comite alte
infracţiuni. Dispunându-se fata de sine o astfel de măsura de siguranţa s-au încălcat drepturile
garantate de CEDO, art. 6 si 7 , soluţia dispusă fiind în fapt o modalitate prin care organele
judiciare si-au acoperit încălcările normelor de procedura si ale principiilor de drept.
Contestatorul a apreciat ca, în esenţa, măsura de siguranţa la acre a fost obligata este vadit
nelegala si netemeinică.
Ulterior formulării contestaţii contestatorul nu s-a prezenta pentru a o susţine, date fiind
împrejurările cauzei acestuia i s-a desemnat un apărător din oficiu.
Analizând contestaţia formulată, motivele invocate, precum si Încheierea contestată,
Judecătorul de Cameră Preliminară reţine următoarele:
Contestatorul a fost cercetat in dosarul de urmărire penală înregistrat la nr. 2845/P/2016
pentru infracţiunea de încălcare a solemnităţii şedinţei de judecata, prev. de art. 278 Cod penal
pentru care s-a început urmărirea penală la data de 18.05.2016.
Prin Ordonanţa din 07.09.2016 s-a dispus efectuarea in continuare a urmăriri penale
fata de contestator, Ordonanţa confirmata de Parchetul de pe langa Judecătoria Focşani la dat de
08.09.2016.
Prin Ordonanţa din 21.07.2016 s-a dispus începerea urmăririi penale pentru încălcarea
solemnităţii şedinţei infracţiunea prevăzuta la art. 278 Cod penal, constând in acea ca în şedinţa
Camerei de Consiliu din 24.06.2016 contestatorul a folosit in mod repetat in fata completului
de judecata cuvinte jignitoare si acuze, încălcând astfel solemnitatea şedinţei de judecata.
Prin Ordonanţa din 07.09.2016 s-a dispus efectuarea in continuarea a urmăririi penale
fata de contestator pentru aceasta fapta .
Prin Ordonata din 05.08.2016 s-a dispus începerea urmăriri penale pentru infracţiune de
încălcare a solemnităţii şedinţei prev. de art. 278 Cod penal, constând în acea ca in şedinţa
Camerei de Consiliu din 24.06.2016, contestatorul a folosit in mod repetat cuvinte jignitoare si
acuze in fata completului de judecata perturbând activitatea instanţei si afectând solemnitatea
şedinţei de judecată.
ANNEX 19 / ECHR Page 218 of 403

Prin Ordonata din 07.09.2016 s-a dispus efectuarea in continuarea a urmăririi penale fata
de contestator pentru acesta infracţiune.
Prin Ordonanţa din 08.09.2016, s-au reunit dosarele nr. 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 la
dosarul nr. 2845/P/2016.
Prin Ordonanţa din 02.11.2016 s-a pus in mişcare acţiunea penală fata de contestator
pentru cele 3 infracţiuni prev. la art 278 Cod penal.
In timpul urmăriri penale contestatorului i s-a cerut consimţământul pentru expertizarea
medico legala psihiatrica, acesta nefiind de acord. La data de 08.12.2016 s-a dispus efectuarea
unei expertize medico legale psihiatrice fata de contestator, prin Încheierea din 05.04.2017 a
Judecătorului de Drepturi si Libertati de la Judecătoria Focşani, s-a dispus emiterea mandatului
de aducere in scopul prezentării contestatorului la comisia medico – legala psihiatrică, mandat
executat la data de 06.04.2017.
In urma examinării medico –legale comisia de expertiza medico –legală psihiatrica din
cadrul SJML Vrancea a recomandat internarea inculpatului într-o instituie medico legala de
specialitate in vederea examinării psihiatrice.
Prin Încheierea din 10.04.2017, Judecătorul de Drepturi si Libertati de la Judecătoria
Focşani a dispus internarea medicala nevoluntară a contestatorului pentru efectuarea expertizei
psihiatrice.
Potrivit concluziile raportului întocmit contestatorul prezintă tulburare psihotică acută
predominant delirantă, tulburare de personalitate de tip paranoid. Comisia a apreciat
discernământul contestatorului absent la momentul şi în raport de faptele pentru care a fost
cercetat si a recomandat instituirea măsurii de siguranţa a obligării la tratament medical.
Fata de aceste condiţii s-a dispus clasarea cauzei în temeiul art. 16 alin 1 lit d Cod
procedura penală si sesizarea Judecătorului de Camera preliminara pentru a dispune măsura de
siguranţa a obligării la tratament medical.
Sesizarea Parchetului, în acest sens, a fost înregistrat la nr. 12718/231/2017 la Judecătoria
Focşani.
Prin Încheierea Judecătorului de Camera preliminară din 11.10.2017 a fost respinsa ca
inadmisibilă cererea contestatorului formulata in timpul judecării cauzei de sesizarea a Curţii
Constituţionale cu excepţia de neconstituţionalitate a disp. art. 315 Cod penal, a fost admisa
sesizarea Parchetului si a fost obligat contestatorul la tratament medicamentos până la
însănătoşire sau până la ameliorarea stării de sănătate care sa înlăture starea de pericol a
acestora.
In motivarea Încheierii s-a reţinut că, în cauza sunt îndeplinite condiţiile prev. la art. 109
alin 1 Cod penal pentru dispunerea măsurii de siguranţa, având in vedere concluziile expertizei
medico legale, măsura fiind necesar pentru înlăturarea unei stări de pericol.
Soluţia este legala si temeinică.
În ce priveşte cererea de sesizare a Curţii Constituţionale, cu excepţia privind
neconstituţionalitatea art. 315 Cod procedura penală, in mod temeinic Judecătorul de Camera
Preliminara de la fond a respins-o ca inadmisibilă întrucât nu are legătura cu aceasta cauza,
esenţa cauzei fiind concret condiţiile in care se dispune o măsura de siguranţă.
Referitor la soluţia dispusă, si anume, luarea măsurii de siguranţa a tratamentului
medical aceasta este de asemenea legala si temeinică.
Contestatorul a fost cercetat pentru mai multe infracţiuni dispunându-se clasarea pentru
lipsa discernământului.
ANNEX 19 / ECHR Page 219 of 403

Expertiza medico legala efectuata in cauză a relevat o afecţiune psihică a contestatorului


care necesita tratament medical sub supraveghere, pentru înlăturarea stării de pericol în care
însuşi contestatorul s-ar putea plasa sau iar putea pune pe cei din jur, fiind îndeplinite astfel,
condiţiile prevăzute la art. 109 Cod penal.
Din expertiza medico legala psihiatrica rezultă că, în urma examinării repetat a
contestatorului s-a constatat ca acesta este imprevizibil în relaţiile sociale, prezintă determinare
si perseverenta iraţională, precum si un risc de escaladare rapidă de la violenta virtuală si de
limbaj la violenta fizică.
Aceste împrejurări îndreptăţesc concluzia ca pentru înlăturarea stării de pericol, apreciată
in funcţie de constatările de mai sus se impune obligarea contestatorului la tratament medical de
specialitate, măsura benefica în primul rând contestatorului din prezenta cauză, care poate
oricând să conteste tratamentul recomandat de medicii specialişti, în mod întemeiat, să ceara
tratament alternativ, etc.
În prezenta contestaţie, nu a fost expus nici un argument care să înlăture argumentele şi
considerentele pe care Judecătorul de Camera preliminara de la instanţa de fond si-a întemeiat
soluţia.
Pentru aceste considerente urmează să respingă contestaţia formulata de inculpatul
Raneti Tudor Andrei, ca nefondata.
Văzând şi disp. art. 275 alin. 2 şi 6 Cod procedura penală

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE,


ÎN NUMELE LEGII,
DISPUNE

Respinge ca nefondata contestaţia formulată de câtre contestatorul Raneti Tudor


Andrei, domiciliat în București, Bd. Theodor Pallady, nr.2, bl. M2A, sc.B, et.6, ap.61, sect.3, cu
adresă de corespondență electronică aleasă tudor.raneti@gmail.com, împotriva Încheierii de
Camera Preliminara pronunţata de Judecătoria Focşani la data de 11.10.2017, in dosarul
12718/231/2017.
Obligă contestatorul la 50 lei cheltuieli judiciare câtre stat.
Definitivă .
Pronunţată în Camera de Consiliu, azi 02.02.2018

Judecător de Cameră Preliminară, Grefier,


Măndica Badiu Haiduc Luminiţa Mioara

Red. B.M/tehnored. L.M.H/5ex./20.02.2018


ANNEX 19 / ECHR Page 220 of 403

dosar nr. 12718/231/2017


1 message

Luminita Haiduc <luminita.haiduc@just.ro> Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:55 PM


To: tudor.raneti@gmail.com

Buna ziua,
 Vă comunicăm alăturat Incheierea din Camera  de Consiliu din data de 02.02.2018 pronunţată  de Tribunalul Vrancea, în
dosarul penal nr. 12718/231/2017.

2 attachments
incheiere 12178-231-2017 din 02.02.2018.doc
51 KB
comunicare dosar nr. 12178-231-2017.doc
75 KB
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 221 of 403

Annex 20 inventory, summary demonstration, indicates full demonstration,

1. 78 pages, my original plead in Romanian against the falsified “prosecutor’s” proposal implicitly
against the falsified decisions in 12718/231/2017 as anticipated the mafia will instigate to
Crimes against humanity against me to indefinitely incarcerate me to life, Torture, Bodily Harm
and Qualifiedly Murder me as objectivized in annex 21 and section A of my ICC penal complaint
2. 14 pages, my original notification in Romanian to the Romanian Constitutional Court against
articles 315 paragraph 2 in rapport with article 16 paragraph 1 letter d in rapport with articles
566 - 572 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code and other similar ones regarding the
obligation to medical treatment such as articles 245-246, based on the presumption of
innocence, right to life, physiological and psychological integrity, the supremacy of the
Romanian Constitution to the law which is unconstitutional, or, the principle of legality,
infringement of the right to fair (legal) trial, infringement of the right to freedom of conscience
and religion, infringement of the right of free expression (of conscience), infringement of the
right to an effective national (justice) remedy, discrimination and interpretation of the law
contrary to human rights with murderous aforethought

Explicated demonstration of the falsification of these documents is to be found in my ICC penal


complaint published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-
ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity, particularly sections I.B.2-I.B.4 and preliminary sections 2-4

In conclusion the falsified “prosecutor’s” proposal and the falsified decisions in


12718/231/2017implicitly as anticipated in my original plead in Romanian against them attached as this
annex, are a direct instigation and implicitly complicity to wrongful political repression through the
perpetration of Crimes against humanity attempt to indefinitely incarcerate me to life, torture and
murder me that determined me to become a permanent refugee based on these grounds as I’ve
objectivized in annex 21, Crimes against humanity attempted through the falsified decision in
12718/231/2017 for the crimes and diagnosis of another person named Vasilache Daniel as proven in
annex 19 because I was never indicted, convicted and diagnosed as proven by annex 17 and annex 22,
and using the annulled “psychiatric” charlatanry documents from 14277/231/2015 which I proven
falsified in annex 4 and annex 3 even where the “psychiatric” charlatanry falsified arguments were
annulled first which is the earliest ne bis in idem situation created later in the falsified dossiers
14277/231/2015, 4791/231/2017, 4909/231/2017 and 12718/231/2015, as the Romanian “state” mafia
incrementally assured itself public opinion is dead in Romania and nobody would be outrages as nobody
was for the fact I was illegally deprived of liberty, Tortured, Bodily Harmed and that Qualified Murder
has been attempted against me continuously between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 by being put in
anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days through deadly fluorine and chlorine injections without treatment,
then after I survived forced to take other deadly fluorine and chlorine deadly neurotoxins as objectivized
in annex 21 and section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 of my ICC penal complaint. These documents are also null because
all the falsified acts of procedure in the falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and
4329/P/2016 are null for being started off from a falsified dossier as I’ve proven in my ICC penal
complaint sections I.B.2-I.B.4, according to articled 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 222 of 403

Catre Judecatoria Focsani


Dosar 12718/231/2017

Domnule presedinte,

subsemnatul Raneti Tudor Andrei , domiciliat in Bucuresti bd. Theodor Pallady nr. 2, bl. M2A, sc.
B, et. 6, apt. 61, sectorul 3, unde nu locuiesc din 2009, identificat cu B.I./C.I. seria RT nr. 654712 emis de
SPCEP S3 biroul nr. 4 la data de 04.09.2009 si avand C.N.P. 1801010394508, cu adresa de
corespondenta electronica aleasa cf. art. 257 (5), art. 259 (1) si art. 289 (5) din CPP modificat si
completat prin OUG nr. 3/2014: tudor.raneti@gmail.com,

in calitate de nevinovat in dosarele falsificate 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 avand


obiectul Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei, implicit in dosarul falsificat intentat din acestea
12718/231/2017 avand obiectul obligarea la tratament medical, cf. art. 6 (2) din CEDO “Orice persoană
acuzată de o infracţiune este prezumată nevinovată pînă ce vinovăţia sa va fi legal stabilită” dat fiind ca
vinovatia mea n-a fost legal stabilita nici demonstrata deoarece acest lucru este imposibil fiindca toate
probele din aceste dosare demonstreaza nevinovatia mea si oricum un procuror nu are capacitatea
juridica de a stabili vinovatia sau nevinovatia unei persoane cf. art. 6 (1) din CEDO si chiar conform
doctrinei romanesti cf. art. 23 (11) privind prezumtia de nevinovatie”Până la rămânerea definitivă a
hotărârii judecătoreşti de condamnare, persoana este considerată nevinovată” si cf. art. 4 si
art. 99 din CPP, precum si art. 124 privind aplicarea unitara a dreptului din Constitutia Romaniei si
jurispundentei romanesti din dosarul 907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei din care citez
conform articolului de specialitate de la adresa: http://www.juridice.ro/346691/romania-la-cedo-cauza-
pendinte-ivascu-internarea-medicala-nevoluntara-la-ordinul-procurorului-dreptul-la-viata-privata-si-
raspunderea-statului.html
“...un ordin pentru a urma un tratament psihiatric nu poate fi impus reclamantului până când nu se va
stabili că acesta a comis o infracțiune, dar și că există pericolul de a comite alte infracțiuni pe viitor” cu
meniunea ca demonstrez in prezenta ca si-n dosarul identic adica bazat pe o propunere falsificata de
obligarea mea la tratament medical 14277/231/2015 anulata ca inadmisibila si nefondata, pe baza
declaratiilor publice a psihiatrilor romani ca bolile mintale implicit tratamentul psihiatric nu exista iar in
baza documentarului stiintific “Comercializarea nebuniei” (en. “Marketing of madness”) indicat la proba
2 din dosarul 14277/231/2015 cerut a se aduce in 12718/231/2017 deoarece sunt in raport de
autoritatea de lucru judecat cu privire la acuzatiile ca am savarsit fara discernamant fapte fictive, arat
ceea ce se demonstreaza in acesta, ca psihiatria este o sarlatanie folosita ca arma de represiune
nedreapta a adevarului de regimurile totalitare,
deoarece in fapt, sunt acuzat de fapte care nu exista fizic adica de tulburarea linistii care este
imposibila prin ascultarea la casti de carti audio precum demonstreaza insusi faptul ca am fost acuzat
dupa o ora si jumatate timp in care am facut acelasi lucru precum am facut in alte sedinte inainte si
dupa din aceeasi instanta si alte instante, iar gesturile si cuvintele de ocara nu exista conform
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 223 of 403

martorilor care nu le precizeaza si inregistrarilor audio a sedintelor de judecata precum si a


declaratiilor mele pe propria raspundere date fara sa fiu acuzat de Falsul in declaratii macar drept
dovada, si prin urmare faptele nu exista nici d.p.d.v. penal adica acuzatiile sunt mincinoase. Daca
fapta nu exista fizic sau penal, nu se poate infera ca am savarsit o fapta din cauza unor afectiuni
mintale deci toate actele medicale sunt si ele vadit falsificate ca si ordonantele. Cf. art. 7 (1) din CEDO
nici o fapta fictiva nu contituie o fapta penala deoarece acestea nu sunt evident incriminate penal, iar
prin ingradirea dreptului meu la aparare cf. art. 6 (3) din CEDO prin refuzul de a mi se acorda dreptul de
a consulta dosarul prin solutionarea cererii de comunicarea inscrisurilor ordonante si alte probe cf. art.
78, art, 83 b) si art. 94 (2,8) din CPP din dosare sau prin refuzul de a infaptui confruntarea cf. art. 131 din
CPP dat fiind ca martorii din dosar desi nu contribuie la acuzarea mea, sunt vadit incoerenti facand
acuzatii generice si aberante cel mai probabil sperand la foloasele necuvenite promise de asa-zisele
organe judiciare ce au falsificat dosarele, deoarece singurul celalalt motiv posibil ca cineva sa ma
vorbeasca de rau este vrasmasia, ori nu-i cunosc pe martori macar ca aceasta sa fie posibil cu exceptia
“jandarmilor” Butuc si Lepadatu care in 2014 au participat deasemenea la musamalizarea unui dosar
prin scoaterea mea din propriul interogatoriul prin comisie rogatorie unde “judecatorul” Jelea Andreea
incerca degeaba sa-mi dicteze ce sa raspund, iar interogarea acestora in regim de confruntare ar fi fost
utila determinarii adevarului despre cine i-a pus sa zica tampenii despre mine cum ca faptul ca m-a
chemat un jandarm sa ma duc in alta sala de judecata la chemarea judecatorului inseamna ca sunt eu
arogant si alte aberatii asemenea, abuzuri prin care mi s-a incalcat in particular dreptul la un proces
echitabil cf. art. 6 (3) b)d) din CEDO. Pe data de 01.08.2017 asa-zisul procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian de la
Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani a avut inca un episod maniacal si savarsind infractiunea de
Uzurparea functiei si Uzurparea de calitati oficiale a mintit ca am savarsit infractiunea de Incalcarea
solemnitatii sedintei incalcandu-mi prezumtia de nevinovatie cf. art. 6 (2) din CEDO ignorand deliberat
faptul ca toate probele adica martorii, probele materiale audio inregistrarile de sedinta din 18.05.2016 si
24.06.2016 coroborate cu declaratiile si pledoaria mea demonstreaza mai presus de orice dubii
rezonabile ca faptele nu exista fizic si prin urmare nu exista d.p.d.v. penal, si a emis ordonanta de clasare
din 01.08.2017 din 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016, apoi incalcandu-mi din nou dreptul la un
proces echitabil cf. art. 6 (1) din CEDO a intentat propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical
12718/231/2017 vadit falsificata ca si cea din 14277/231/2015 si precum sunt ordonantele de inceperea
urmaririi penale, continuarea urmaririi penale si punerea in miscare a urmaririi penale din 2417/P/2014,
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 care sunt vadit falsificate fiindca nu contin silogismul juridic
al demonstrarii existentei faptei adica premiza particulara a demonstratiei existentei faptei inferata
motivat din administrarea probelor si corelarea acestei pledoarii cu premiza universala a legii, ci contin
doar acuzatii generice tipic mincinosilor fara premizele necesare validitatii actului juridic conform logicii
juridice ceea ce atrage nulitatea actului juridic din cauza nerespectarii legii cf. art. 286 (2) d) din CPP
privind obligatia organului judiciar de a motiva in fapt si de drept actul judiciar, precum si pentru
nerespectarea integrala a tuturor celorlalte garantii procesuale cum ar fi dreptul la aparare cf. art. 6 (3)
b)d) din CEDO, incalcat prin faptul ca nu mi s-a acordat dreptul de a studia dosarul in sensul comunicarii
in copie a actelor din dosar cf. art. 78, art, 83 b) si art. 94 (2,8) din CPP sau efectuarea confruntarii cf. art.
131 din CPP, precum nu s-a consemnat, administrat si obiectivat nici o proba pentru mine dar si
impotriva mea deoarece este imposibil, abuz grav motivat de intentia ilicita asa-ziselor organe judiciare
de a-si musamaliza actele de procedura falsificate si de a manipula continutul dosarului in scopul
falsificarii realitatii de fapt inclusiv prin ascunderea fata de mine a mai multor documente din acesta
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 224 of 403

cum ar ordonantele, in special ordonanta falsificata de punere in miscare a actiunii penale expres
prevazuta de lege ca se comunica cf. art. 309 (3) din CPP, certificatele medico-legale psihiatrice
falsificatesi alte acte “medicale” falsificate, marturii false s.a.m.d., delirand (crezand fals) ca-mi
ingreuneaza acuzarea penala a asa-ziselor organe judiciare, medici-legisti, psihiatri si eventual martori
mincinosi din aceste dosare, respectiv nu mi s-a respectat prezumtia de nevinovatie cf. art. 6 (2) din
CEDO dat fiind ca sunt singurul acuzat de o fapta fictiva pentru care nu am fost condamnat definitiv
deci fapta nu exista nici macar fizic si nici macar in realitate ascultarea la casti de carti audio nu poate
tulbura linistea si nu constituie o fapta penala evident iar cuvinte si gesturi de ocara care nu exista
conform inregistrarilor audio si marturiilor generice si aberante care oricum nu se pot contrazice cu
inregistrarea audio, cu atat mai putin nu pot exista, respectiv nu s-au administrat probele nici macar
pentru partea acuzarii pentru ca este imposibil de justificat minciunile evidente din dosarele
2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 constituind infractiunile de Falsul in declaratii
si Inducerea in eroare a organelor judiciare savarsite Paun Ionel Iulian si Popa Mariana, asa-zisi
judecatori de la Judecatoria Focsani respectiv Tribunalul Vrancea in incercarea in special prin
Amenintare, Santaj, Lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal, Supunerea la rele tratamente, Vatamarea
corporala si tentativa de Omor calificat precum si alte infractiuni, de a musamaliza realitatea despre
dosarul falsificat 2417/P/2014 de Mihaila Paul in principal la instigarea asa-zisului judecator Dita Mirela
cu concursul si complicitatea mai multor asa-zise organe judiciare si alti functionari publici precum
atesta dosarele falsificate in legatura 10547/231/2015, 11224/231/2015 si 14277/231/2015, si
deoarece de drept sunt nevinovat conform prezumtiei de nevinovatie cf. art. 6 (2) din CEDO si
prin urmare fapta nu exista fizic - deoarece nu exista o hotarare definitiva conform careia am fost
condamnat, si fiindca sunt singurul suspect / acuzat din dosare, conform legii nu doar a probatoriului,
fapta nu poate exista nici macar fizic conform prezumtiei de nevinovatie cf. art. 4 si art. 99 din CPP si art.
23 din Constitutia Romaniei. Daca fapta nu exista fizic sau penal, nu se poate infera ca am savarsit o
fapta din cauza unor afectiuni mintale deci toate actele medicale sunt vadit falsificate. In realitatea de
drept integrala insa, cf. art. 20 din Constitutia Romaniei si cf. art. 6 (2) din CEDO o persoana este
nevinovata pana la dovedirea vinovatiei sale printr-o hotarare de condamnare cu respectarea integrala a
garantiilor procesuale cf. art. 6 (1) din CEDO adica nu hotararea de condamnare inceteaza prezumtia de
nevinovatie, ci demonstratia vinovatiei cu respectarea garantiilor procesuale, nicidecum prezumtia de
nevinovatie incetand la falsificarea unei ordonante de renuntarea la urmarirea penala ce n-are nici un
suport de drept constitutional in Romania si in CEDO cu care de fapt este in contradictie cf. art. 6 (1) din
CEDO, ori judecatorii si cetatenii in general au obligatia de a respecta suprematia Constitutiei Romaniei
cf. art. 1 din CR si a tratatelor ratificate de Romania cf. art. 11 si 20 din CR, si

formulez in conditiile legii prezenta,


ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 225 of 403

Intampinare

la propunerea falsificata de obligarea mea la tratament medical 12718/231/2017 intentata din


dosarele falsificate si conexate 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016, in mod identic ca
propunerea falsificata de obligarea mea la tratament medical 14277/231/2015 constatata inadmisibila si
nefondata, intentata din dosarul falsificat 2417/P/2014, pentru care s-au falsificat in mod identic si
paralel dosarele 10547/231/2015 - 4791/231/2017, 11224/231/2015 - 4909/231/2017
prin care in rezumat,
solicit respingerea propunerii la obligarea la tratament medical din 12718/231/2017 deoarece:
1. este inadmisibila adica ilegala precum a fost si propunerea identic mincinoasa din
14277/231/2015, respinsa ca inadmisibila si nefondata.
Masurile de siguranta nu se iau fata de suspecti sau inculpati ci doar fata de condamnati cf. art.
107-109 din CP, si conform jurisprudentei adica conform principiului aplicarii unitare a dreptului cf. art.
124 din CR si hotararii 907/307/2010 “...un ordin pentru a urma un tratament psihiatric nu poate fi
impus reclamantului până când nu se va stabili că acesta a comis o infracțiune, dar și că există pericolul
de a comite alte infracțiuni pe viitor”. Fiindca nu am fost condamnat printr-o hotarare definitiva de
condamnare prin care sa se fi demonstrat vinovatia mea cu respectarea garantiilor procesuale, obligarea
mea la tratament medical este inadmisibila, fiindca beneficiez de prezumtia de nevinovatie, neavand
calitatea de inculpat deoarece nu sunt urmarit penal in vreun dosar precum atesta ordonanta falsificata
de clasare din 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 care nu atesta existenta niciunei condamnari
conform dreptului intern adica Codului de procedura penala dar si dreptului UE adica cf. art. 11 si art. 20
din CR si cf. art. 6 (1) din CEDO, art. 11 din Declaratia universala a drepturilor omului, si care inceteaza
urmarirea penala conform Codului de procedura penala situatie in care nu mai am nici o calitate
procesuala. Utilizarea sistemului judiciar, psihiatriei si fortelor de ordine in mod ilegal ca arma de
represiune nedreapta a adevarului despre activitatea criminala a “magistratilor”, “medicilor legisti”,
“politistilor” is “jandarmilor” Constituiti intr-un grup infractional organizat cel putin in Vrancea
constituie in flagrant incalcarea 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din Protocolul 12
al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale, precum explicitez sumarizat la punctul 4 mai jos si prin prezenta
detaliat
Masura de siguranta a obligarii la tratament medical nu se poate lua decat fata de condamnatii
pentru omor sau pruncucidere cf. art. 184 (1) din CPP deoarece indoiala procurorului cf. art. 4 (2) din
CPP se interpreteaza doar in favoarea suspectului sau acuzatului, art. 184 (1) din CPP facand derogare
pentru expertiza psihiatrica pentru suspectii sau acuzatii de omor sau pruncucidere, si aceasta doar cu
consimtamantul lor cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP. Prin urmare si deoarece art. 107-109 din CP privesc doar cei
care nu beneficiaza de prezumtia de nevinovatie, adica faptuitorii sau condamnatii, masura de siguranta
a obligarii la tratament medical in cazul meu privind fapta dovedit fictiva de Incalcarea solemnitatii
sedintei prin tulburarea imposibila a linistii prin ascultarea de carti audio la casti sau gesturi si cuvinte de
ocara care nu exista conform probelor materiale a inregistrarilor audio a sedintelor de judecata,
conform martorilor care bat campii pe alte teme in mod generic demonstrand ca sunt instigati de
“organele judiciare” si cel mai probabil si alienati prin urmare, si conform declaratiilor mele pe propria
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 226 of 403

raspundre fara sa fiu acuzat de Falsul in declaratii si Inducerea in eroare a organelor judiciare ceea ce
face proba veritatii faptului ca “organele judiciare” recunosc ca am dreptate fiindca nu ma acuza de
acestea, precum si multe alte probe cum ar fi martorii propusi si neaudiati, neconsemnarea,
neadministrarea si neobiectivarea probatoriului nici pentru mine nici pentru acuzare facand ordonantele
perfect nemotivate, refuzul de a-mi acorda dreptul de a studia dosarul prin comunicarea in copie a
elementelor din acesta necomunicate de mine cf. art. 94 (2)(8) din CPP s.a.m.d.
Nu am calitate procesuala in vreun dosar penal si neavand calitate procesuala precum fiind
necondamnat adica beneficiind de prezumtia de nevinovatie, nu pot fi supus nici unei masuri penale de
nici un fel, adica din acelasi motiv pentru care propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical din
14277/231/2015 a fost constatata inadmisibila.
Dat fiind ca otravirea cu Invega si alte neurotoxine pe baza de fluor si clor provoaca distrugerea
creierului si in cele din urma moartea conform prospectului Invega cu care am fost deja Vatamat
corporal in perioada 27.05.2017-08.06.2017 sub motivarea ca sunt student anul I la drept la
Universitatea Ecologica centrul de la Scoala Generala “Anghel Saligny”, deoarece am fost detinut ilegal
de la examene, legal si otravit la psihiatrie fara nici o justificare legala, factuala si fara sa existe vreun act
juridic medical pentru nici un abuz grav savarsit in aceasta perioada, si bineinteles cu incalcarea
integrala a legislatiei in vigoare, inseamna ca aceiasi criminali vor proceda in mod identic sau mai rau in
urma obligarii mele la “tratament medical” adica la otravire cu neurotoxina Invega pe baza de fluor. Asa-
zisa companie care a comercializat Invega a fost condamnata adesea pentru comercializarea de otravuri
ca medicamente, pretinde ca trateaza schizofrenia, diagnostic ce pana si-n fisa de externare falsificata
din 08.06.2017 nu exista precum evident n-a existat nici la data de 27.05.2017, fiind evident in concluzie
ca nu este vorba de medicina care prin juramantul lui Hipocrate nu poate cauza rau, si nici de masuri de
siguranta, ci de o atrocitate premeditata a crimei organizate din “provincia europeana” Vrancea. Aceasta
constituie o grava incalcare a dreptului la viata cf. art. 2 din CEDO
Internarea nevoluntara cf. art. 315 (2) e) din CPP n-are nici o legatura cu obligarea la tratament
medical provizoriu cf. art. 566-572 din CPP deoarece internarea nevoluntara se dispune doar cu
incalcarea legii din start fiindca este in contradictoriu cu art. 566-572 din CPP care prevede internarea
nevoluntara doar in cazul refuzului “tratamentului” adica a otravirii in acest caz, ceea ce releva intentia
criminala a mafiei magistratilor de a ma lichida prin otravire cu neurotoxine pentru a-si musamaliza
crimele pe care le-am denuntat public si la parchet. Demonstrez si ca procurorul e vadit iresponsabil,
precum atesta faptul ca nu se scrie in ordonanta de clasare cf. art. 315 (2) din CPP “clasare cauzei ...
pentru savarsirea infractiunilor ... art. 278 Cp., art.278 Cp. si art. 278 Cp. cu aplicarea artr. 38” deoarece
[1] cauzele nu se claseaza cf. art. 315 (2) niciodata, acelea fiind mentiuni pentru clasarea cf. art. 315 (1)
din CPP, [2] nu se scrie “infractiunilor ... art. 278 Cp., art.278 Cp. si art. 278 Cp.” ci se face o singura data
acordul si mai ales se demonstreaza savarsirea infractiunilor, nu se declara deoarece aceasta nu este
niciodata o demonstratie conform logicii juridice, ci un rechizitoriu este, [3] Cod Penal se prescurteaza
“C.P. “nu “Cp.”, [4] e vorba de art. 28 nu 38, s.a.m.d.

Utilizarea sistemului judiciar, psihiatriei si fortelor de ordine in mod ilegal ca arma de represiune
nedreapta a adevarului despre activitatea criminala a “magistratilor”, “medicilor legisti”, “politistilor” is
“jandarmilor” Constituiti intr-un grup infractional organizat cel putin in “provincia europeana” Vrancea
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 227 of 403

constituie in flagrant incalcarea 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din Protocolul 12
al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale, precum explicitez sumarizat la punctul 4 mai jos si prin prezenta
detaliat

2. este nefondata adica neintemeiata pe fapte reale precum a fost si propunerea identic
mincinoasa din 14277/231/2015, ci intemeiata pe minciuni precum atesta probatoriul dosarelor
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 dealtfel neconsemnat, neadministrat si neobiectivat nici
macar pentru acuzare tocmai fiindca este imposibil de dovedit vinovatia mea in baza unor probe care-mi
demonstreaza nevinovatia. Cf. art. 7 (1) din CEDO, nici o fapta fictiva nu constituie o fapta penala
Mai mult, toate actele “medicale” sunt falsificate deoarece au fost intocmite in lipsa mea - cf.
art. 10 din Legea 487/2002 expertiza nu poate avea loc decat in mod direct, si in mod direct poate avea
loc doar cu consimtamantul meu cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP, ceea ce in ordonanta falsificata de clasare este
consemnat ca nu l-am dat vreodata, stiind ca “organele judiciare” Constituite intr-un grup infractional
organizat au nevoie de consimtamantul meu pentru a falsifica legalitatea expertizei, dat fiind ca nu pot
falsifica fondul expertizei oricum precum am demonstrat in prezenta ca actele “medicale” sunt
falsificate in fond adica fara nici o inferenta juridica logica, fara precizarea faptelor adica, doar prin
acuzatii generice adesea contradictorii
Mai mult, toate actele “medicale” sunt necomunicate in mod ilegal si prin urmare inadmisibile
conform principiului contradictorialitatii cf. art. 349 si art. 351 din CPP si dreptului garantat la aparare.
Aceasta constituie o incalcare a garantiilor procesuale cf. art. 6 (1) din CEDO
Utilizarea sistemului judiciar, psihiatriei si fortelor de ordine in mod ilegal ca arma de represiune
nedreapta a adevarului despre activitatea criminala a “magistratilor”, “medicilor legisti”, “politistilor” is
“jandarmilor” Constituiti intr-un grup infractional organizat cel putin in “provincia europeana” Vrancea
constituie in flagrant incalcarea 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din Protocolul 12
al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale, precum explicitez sumarizat la punctul 4 mai jos si prin prezenta
detaliat

3. este nefondata adica neintemeiata pe acte medicale reale deoarece aceastea daca exista in
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 sunt falsificate la fel cum au fost falsificate in 2417/P/2014.
Declar pe propria raspundere ca n-am fost vreodata expertizat psihiatric nu doar fiindca n-am consimtit
cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP si art. 11 din Legea 487/2002, sau fiindca expertiza este ilegala fata de mine
fiindca se dispunde doar pentru omor si pruncucidere cf. art. 184 (1) din CPP in caz contrar orice
indoiala a procurorului interpretandu-se obligatoriu in favoarea suspectului sau acuzatului cf. art. 4 (2)
din CPP, ci fiindca fizic declar pe propria raspundere ca nici macar n-am fost intrebat vreodata de ceva
in legatura cu 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 de psihiatri sau psihologi,
tocmai fiindca acuzatiile ce mi se aduc sunt vadit fictive si a ma si intreba daca am savarsit fapte vadit
fictive si de ce ar insemna ca cel care intreaba e veritabil tampit, un rol pe care nici macar asa-zisii medici
psihiatri vranceni n-au consimtit sa-l joace. Mai mult, deoarece la niste examene psihologice de
personalitate si inteligenta am fost intrebat in mod identic ca la examenele psihologice de la medicina
muncii si medicina armatei, si fiindca n-am fost diagnosticat pentru acestea in trecut, evident nu pot fi
diagnosticat pe acestea in prezent decat prin falsificarea actelor “medicale” - psihologia nici macar nu
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 228 of 403

pretinde ca este medicina ca sarlatania numita “psihiatria” care de fapt e acelasi lucru cu exceptia ca
este utilizata de statele totalitare ca arma de represiune precum a fost utilizata la inceput de nazisti, si
inainte de ei de orice sarlatan - Sigmund Freud spre exemplu a luat spaga de la doua companii
farmaceutice sa promoveze drogurile heroina si opiumul ca tratamente psihiatrice
Utilizarea sistemului judiciar, psihiatriei si fortelor de ordine in mod ilegal ca arma de represiune
nedreapta a adevarului despre activitatea criminala a “magistratilor”, “medicilor legisti”, “politistilor” is
“jandarmilor” Constituiti intr-un grup infractional organizat cel putin in “provincia europeana” Vrancea
constituie in flagrant incalcarea 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din Protocolul 12
al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale, precum explicitez sumarizat la punctul 4 mai jos si prin prezenta
detaliat

4. este neconstitutionala / nelegala si prin urmare inadmisibila cf. art. 11 si art. 20 din CR
deoarece imi incalca
4.1. dreptul de a-mi fi respectate drepturile omului cf. art. 1 din CEDO, respectiv
4.2. dreptul la viata cf. art. 2 din CEDO, dat fiind ca otravirea cu Invega si alte neurotoxine pe
baza de fluor si clor provoaca distrugerea creierului si in cele din urma moartea conform prospectului
Invega cu care am fost deja Vatamat corporal in perioada 27.05.2017-08.06.2017 fara nici un diagnostic,
sub motivarea implicita ca sunt student anul I la drept la Universitatea Ecologica centrul de la Scoala
Generala “Anghel Saligny”, deoarece am fost detinut ilegal de la examene, legal si otravit la psihiatrie
fara nici o justificare legala, factuala si fara sa existe vreun act juridic medical pentru nici un abuz grav
savarsit in aceasta perioada impotriva mea bineinteles cu incalcarea integrala a legislatiei in vigoare,
ceea ce inseamna ca aceiasi criminali vor proceda in mod identic sau mai rau in urma obligarii
mele la “tratament medical” adica otravire cu neurotoxina Invega pe baza de fluor. Asa-zisa companie
care a comercializat Invega a fost condamnata adesea pentru comercializarea de otravuri ca
medicamente, pretinde ca trateaza schizofrenia, diagnostic ce pana si-n fisa de externare falsificata din
08.06.2017 nu exista precum evident n-a existat nici la data de 27.05.2017, fiind evident in concluzie ca
nu este vorba de medicina care prin juramantul lui Hipocrate nu poate cauza rau, si nici de masuri de
siguranta, ci de o atrocitate premeditata a crimei organizate din “provincia europeana” Vrancea
4.3. dreptul de a nu fi supus torturii si la tratament inuman sau degradant cf. art. 3 din CEDO,
dat fiind ca am fost Vatamat corporal in perioada 27.05.2017-08.06.2017 precum am descris pe scurt la
punctul anterior si detaliat in continuare
4.4. dreptul la libertate si securitate cf. art. 5 din CEDO dat fiind ca in conformitate cu legea n-
am savarsit nici o fapta penala pentru a fi privat de libertate repetat si cu rea-credinta
4.6. dreptul la un proces echitabil cf. art. 6 din CEDO insemnand dreptul de a fi judecat de o
instanta impartiala deoare n-am fost judecat de loc si prin urmare prin intentarea obligarii la tratament
medical mi s-a incalcat dreptul la prezumtia de nevinovatie, iar pe parcursul asa-zisului proces penal mi
s-a incalcat grosolan dreptul la aparare prin necomunicarea actelor de procedura obligatorii a se
comunica adica ordonante, acte “medicale” si toate probele “impotriva mea” care de fapt nu exista
fiindca toate probele din dosar imi demonstreaza nevinovatia, respectiv inclusiv nu s-a sustinut
confruntarea cf. art. 113 din CPP dat fiind ca marturiile sunt aberante si chiar daca nu contribuie la
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 229 of 403

acuzarea impotriva mea, contribuie la acuzarea mea impotriva asa-ziselor organe judiciare si la
lamurirea cauzei implicit
4.7. dreptul de a nu fi pedepsit decat conform legii cf. art. 7 din CEDO. Deoarece sunt acuzat de
fapte fictive si vadit imposibile conform logicii si probelor de la dosar, evident sunt nevinovat deoarece
faptele fictive nu sunt incriminate penal. Mai mult, asa-zisa medicina adica sarlatania numita psihiatrie
utilizata in acest caz si nu numai ca arma de represiune nedreapta pentru musamalizarea adevarului
despre crimele “magistratilor”, “medicilor legisti”, “politistilor” si “jandarmilor” din “provincia
europeana” Vrancea ca-n lagarele naziste de unde provine in special otravirea cu fluor, nu poate fi
folosita ca pedeapsa deoarece nu pedepsirea este rolul legal al medicinei conform juramantului lui
Hipocrate, ceea ce daca ar fi, ar fi neconstitutional cf. art. 22 din CR privind dreptul la integritatea fizica
si corporala. Nu in ultimul rand doctrinar “tratamentul psihiatric” este administrat ucigasilor ceea ce
releva obsesia criminala a “organelor judiciare” care au falsificat actiunea de obligarea la tratament
medical in scopul de a ma Vatama corporal pentru a ma reduce la tacere cu privire la crimele lor
impotriva mea din aceste dosare si din prealabil pe care incearca sa le musamalizeze astfel
4.8. dreptul de a avea viata privata si de familie cf. art. 8 din CEDO. Deoarece “organele
judiciare” planuiesc sa ma Vateme corporal grav sau sa ma omoare deoarece acesta este efectul otravii
neurotoxice Invega pe termen lung precum a fost documentat in prospect si precum este demonstrat
stiintific de notorietate ca “tratamentul” antipsihotic nu face altceva decat sa distruga creierul, dovedit
prin faptul ca m-au otravit deja in perioada 27.05.2017-08.06.2017 si m-au Vatamat corporal, evident
imi incalca dreptul la viata de orice fel, inclusiv dreptul de a-mi intemeia o familie deoarece otrava
neurotoxica Invega provoaca inclusiv impotenta si anhedonia, adica incapacitatea de a avea copii prin
distrugerea functionalitatii organelor reproductive precum instaleaza si depresia cronica - fluorul nu are
nici o functie biologica, fiind o puternica otrava neurotoxica in primul rand, si fiind toxica in general
pentru orice forma de viata
4.9. dreptul la libertatea gandirii, constiinta si la libertatea religiei cf. art. 9 din CEDO. Prin
obligarea mea la “tratament medical” adica la Vatamarea corporala grava precum demonstrez in
prezenta, imi este incalcata total libertatea gandirii, constiinte si la practica libera a religiei prin
distrugerea creierului si in cele din urma uciderea mea prin otravirea mea cu neurotoxine pe baza de
clor si fluor nejustificat legal sau factual precum grupul infractional organizat care a falsificat dosarele
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 a procedat in perioada 27.05.2017-08.06.2017. Cu
mentiunea ca mi s-a refuzat expres libertatea religioasa in perioada 27.05.2017-08.06.2017 prin refuzul
“psihiatrilor” de a permite sa primesc o carte de rugaciuni de la mama mea.
Pe scurt asa-zisele organe judiciare si asa-zisii medici psihiatri urmaresc sa ma distruga deoarece
fiind credincios in gandire si constiinta statului si ordinii de drept, le-am denuntat crimele impotriva mea
din propriu interes la autoritatile penale, precum si public din patriotism motiv pentru care acestia au
proferat aberatii adesea cu privire la articolele mele de pe internet privind activitatea lor criminala. In
acest scop si in flagrant mi-au cenzurat forumul militia.freeforums.net, si au incercat sa-mi cenzureze
contul de facebook, simultan cu arestarile mele ilegale din 06.04.2017, 10.04.2017 si tentativele de a ma
interna la psihiatrie din 13 si 14.04.2017 in Saptamana Mare adica de Sfintele Pasti, la fel pentru a-mi
batjocori viata religioasa si de familie in tipic stil mafiot
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 230 of 403

4.10. Asa-zisele organe judiciare care au falsificat dosarele 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2015,


3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 in flagrant mi-au cenzurat forumul militia.freeforums.net, si au incercat sa-
mi cenzureze contul de facebook, simultan cu arestarile mele ilegale din 06.04.2017 (4791/231/2017),
10.04.2017 (4909/231/2017) si tentativele de a ma interna la psihiatrie din 13 si 14.04.2017. Dovada
este faptul ca mi s-a reprosat aberant de catre “psihiatrii” instigati sa ma Vateme corporal ca le denunt
si pe pagina mea de facebook crimele, ceea ce este o incalcare flagranta a dreptului la exprimare cf. art.
10 din CEDO, dat fiind ca acest tip de informatii vine in sprijinul statului de drept conform obligatiei
cetatenesti de a apara statul de drept cf. art 55 din CR, ceea ce demonstreaza motivul cenzurii adica
musamalizarea activitatii criminale a “magistratilor”, “medicilor legisti”, “psihiatrilor”, “politistilor” si
“jandarmilor” din “provincia europeana” Vrancea cel putin
4.11. Asa-zisele organe judiciare care au falsificat dosarele 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2015,
3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 in flagrant au falsificat toate ordonantele si hotararile in caile de atac
formulate impotriva ordonantelor si hotararilor pe care le-au falsificat, demonstrand ca acestia pot fi
numiti mafia magistratilor adica o grupare de criminalitate organizata alcatuita din aproape toti
“magistratii” din Vrancea, Galati si Bucuresti, precum am demonstrat prin dosarele penale impotriva
asa-ziselor organe judiciare care au falsificat dosarele 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2015, 3992/P/2016 si
4329/P/2016
Aceasta constituie in flagrant o incalcare a art. 13 din CEDO privind un remediu national efectiv
impotriva abuzilor grave savarsite de mafia magistratilor romani
4.12. dreptul la nondiscriminare sau interzicerea discriminarii cf. art. 14 din CEDO. Grupul
infractional organizat alcatuit din mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici
legisti” si altii care se comporta ca niste gangsteri si tortionari in relatie cu mafia magistratilor, ma
discrimineaza si-mi ingradesc libertatea de constiinta chiar pe motivul politic ca sunt un cetatean onest
credincios statului si ordinii de drept ce incomodeaza activitatea criminala a “magistratilor” ce ma
persecuta abuzand de functia publica utilizand sistemul judiciar, fortele de ordine si psihiatria ca arme
de represiune nedreapta
4.13. dreptul de a nu se savarsi abuzuri impotriva mea prin interpretarea cu rea-credinta a
oricaror articole din CEDO implicit actele normative adica dreptul intern romanesc pentru care CEDO si
celelalte tratate ratificate de Romania constituie drept intern, cf. art. 17 din CEDO. Grupul infractional
organizat alcatuit din mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici legisti” si
altii care se comporta ca niste gangsteri si tortionari in relatie cu mafia magistratilor, au interpretat
legea perfect contradictoriu textului de lege pentru a simula legalitatea crimelor savarsite impotriva mea
cu intentia de a ma Vatama corporal si pentru tentativa de Omor calificat prin otravirea cu neurotoxine
pe baza de clor si fluor pe termen lung

Prin urmare si in scopul cerintelor de a gasi propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical


inadmisibila, nelegala, neconstitutionala si netemeinica va rog sa constatati ca:
1. raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica din 06.04.2017 ce nu mi s-a comunicat in
mod ilegal cf. art. 94 (2)(8) din CPP si art. 58 din Legea 487/2002 dar care exista conform ordonantei
falsificate de clasare din 01.08.2017, cu siguranta nemotivat in conditiile legii sau vadit falsificat
deoarece expertiza psihiatrica se poate realiza doar prin interviu cf. art. 10 din Legea 487/2002 ceea ce
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 231 of 403

n-a avut loc fiindca am refuzat cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP si art. 11 din Legea 487/2002, ori de fata nici
macar n-a fost un reprezentant legal fiind incalcata legea sub toate aspectele pe data de 06.04.2017,
inclusiv motivarea falsificata a mandatului de aducere din 05.04.2017 din 4791/231/2017 deoarece cf.
art. 184 (4) din CPP doar daca suspectul sau inculpatul consimte apoi se sustrage examinarii poate fi
adus cu forta, altfel examinarea este evident imposibila prin refuzul de a sustine interviul care oricum
este inutil indicand ca psihiatria este o sarlatanie nu o stiinta, deoarece in special infractorii sunt
sociopati, iar caracteristica principala a sociopatilor este mitomania, adica acestia mint la interviul
psihiatric si prin urmare examinarea psihiatrica nu are nici o valoare stiintifica sau judiciara, cu atat mai
mult cu cat este evident din aceasta intampinare ca “psihiatrii” sunt infractori sau sociopati criminali si
falsifica rapoartele psihiatrice;
constituie o incalcare a art. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din
Protocolul 12 al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale prin tracasarea mea psihologica implicit
psihosomatica si santajarea mea prin folosirea psihiatriei ca arma de represiune nedreapta si
amenintarea cu lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal, supunerea la rele tratamente si vatamarea
corporala prin otravirea cu neurotoxine, in realitate neexistand tratamente psihiatrice, fluorul si clorul
din asa-zisele medicamente fiind neurotoxine nu tratamente. Grupul infractional organizat alcatuit din
mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici legisti” si altii care se comporta
ca niste gangsteri si tortionari in relatie cu mafia magistratilor, ma discrimineaza si-mi ingradesc
libertatea de constiinta chiar pe motivul ca sunt un cetatean onest credincios ordinii de drept ce
incomodeaza activitatea criminala a “magistratilor” ce ma persecuta abuzand de functia publica
utilizand sistemul judiciar, fortele de ordine si psihiatria ca arme de represiune nedreapta
2. raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica 1447/A1-P/333/09.12.2016 ce nu mi s-a
comunicat in mod ilegal cf. art. 94 (2)(8) din CPP si art. 58 din Legea 487/2002, data la care sau in
prealabil pentru acest raport n-am fost anuntat si prin urmare nu m-am dus personal si nici n-am fost
detinut ilegal si adus cu forta ca pe data de 17.09.2017 prin mandatul falsificat de “judecatorul” Dinu
Murgulet Ana din 10.09.2015 din 10547/231/2015 sau pe data de 06.04.2017 prin mandatul falsificat de
acelasi “judecator” Dinu Murgulet Ana din 05.04.2017 din 4791/231/2017 sub pretextul ilegal al unei
expertize psihiatrice imposibil de realizat fara acordul meu, pentru Santajarea mea, Supunerea mea la
rele tratamente prin Lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal si tracasare, dar si pentru falsificarea raportului
de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232 din presupusa data de 17.09.2015 care in
realitate a fost falsificat in perioada 30.10.2015-03.12.2015 dupa ce clica mafiota ce a falsificat dosarul
2417/P/2014 a pierdut la contestatie actiunea de internarea mea nevoluntara 11224/231/2015. In
concluzie la fel, deoarece examinarea psihiatrica se desfasoara doar prin interviu cf. art. 10 din Legea
487/2002 si pentru raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica 1447/A1-P/333/09.12.2016 nici
macar n-am fost prezent, este dovedit mai presus de orice dubii rezonabile ca raportul de expertiza
medico-legala psihiatrica 1447/A1-P/333/09.12.2016 este falsificat in lipsa mea precum am demonstrat
ca este raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232 in dosarul 14277/231/2015
avand obiectul obligarea la tratament medical respins ca inadmisibil pentru aceleasi motive de
nelegalitate si netemeinicie pentru care invoc inadmisibilitatea si neemeinicia actiunii 12718/231/2017;
constituie o incalcare a art. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din
Protocolul 12 al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale prin tracasarea mea psihologica implicit
psihosomatica si santajarea mea prin folosirea psihiatriei ca arma de represiune nedreapta si
amenintarea cu lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal, supunerea la rele tratamente si vatamarea
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 232 of 403

corporala prin otravirea cu neurotoxine, in realitate neexistand tratamente psihiatrice, fluorul si clorul
din asa-zisele medicamente fiind neurotoxine nu tratamente. Grupul infractional organizat alcatuit din
mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici legisti” si altii care se comporta
ca niste gangsteri si tortionari in relatie cu mafia magistratilor, ma discrimineaza si-mi ingradesc
libertatea de constiinta chiar pe motivul ca sunt un cetatean onest credincios ordinii de drept ce
incomodeaza activitatea criminala a “magistratilor” ce ma persecuta abuzand de functia publica
utilizand sistemul judiciar, fortele de ordine si psihiatria ca arme de represiune nedreapta
3. fisa de externare din 08.06.2017 a Sectiei de psihiatrie a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon”
continand doua diagnostice vadit falsificate cum ca studentia la facultatea de drepet e “psihoza acuta
predominant deliranta “ si “paranoia premorbida” prin faptul ca detentia psihiatrica este relevanta
doar la momentul constatarii necesitatii atentiei psihiatrice adica in prezent cf. art. 122 din
Regulamentul de ordine interioara al Socola Iasi, deoarece declar pe propria raspundere ca nu am fost
expertizat psihiatric in prealabilul datei de 27.05.2017 nici dupa aceasta data ci am fost detinut pe
27.05.2017 de la examenele la facultatea de drept de la centrul Focsani al Universitatii Ecologice de la
Scoala generala “Anghel Saligny” Focsani unde sunt student in anul I de 3 securisti in civil, am fost
incarcerat si legat la psihiatrie fara justificare si fara un diagnostic otravit prin injectare cu neurotoxine
pe baza de fluor si clor adica Haloperidol, Invega respectiv Diazepam si Prazolex. Prospectul Invega
precizez infatiseaza sute de efecte negative permanente documentate stiintific inclusiv moartea si nici
un efect pozitiv documentat stiintific, precum mentionez sarlatania cum ca aceasta otrava trateaza
schizofrenia pentru care nu am fost diagnosticat relevand scopul real al abuzurilor grave din 27.05.2017
- 08.06.2017 adica otravirea - pe durata internarii am fost abuzat fizic si Vatamat corporal si amenintat
de asa-zisul psihiatru curant Barbarosie ca daca refuz sa consimt sa fiu “expertizat” si “tratat” voi fi
obligat la fel prin abuz fizic si Vatamare corporala. Am fost obligat astfel prin amenintare sa iau 10 zile
Prazolex si Invega respectiv la un test de urina care a demonstrat ca nu ma droghez ci psihiatrii si
organele judiciare halucineaza ca ma droghez din moment ce au dispus un asemenea test in special
fiindca nici macar nu m-a acuzat cineva ca ma droghez, si mi s-au prelevat impotriva vointei mele 3 fiole
de sange fara sa reiasa iarasi nici o problema cum ca ma droghez si prin urmare nici un motiv pentru
acest test decat sa fiu Vatamat corporal precum atesta si intentia asa-zisului psihiatru curant sa ma
oblige sa fiu iradiat cu un test CT care nu este pentru creier ci pentru oasele capului si iradiaza de sute de
ori mai mult ca o analiza normala cu raze X. La asa-zisele examene psihologice am constatat aceleasi
intrebari la care am raspuns la examinarile pentru medicina muncii de mai multe ori sau la recrutare si
incorporare in armata, la care am raspuns in mod identic si fiindca nu am fost diagnosticat de medicina
muncii sau de medicina armatei este dovedit mai presus de orice dubii rezonabile ca fisa de externare
din 08.06.2017 a Sectiei de psihiatrie a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon” este falsificata precum demonstrez
prin proba 5 reprezentand pledoaria mea detaliata privind modul in care a fost falsificata aceasta mai
precis prin incalcarea legii si falsificarea in mod generic a realitatii de fapt adica printr-un delir de
termeni psihiatrici aruncati la intamplare fara nici o acoperire in fapte reale cu care ar fi trebui sa se
coreleze aceste inferente pentru a fi valide, motiv pentru care testele se si contrazic tocmai fiindca sunt
fara acoperire in realitatea de fapt si emise de mincinosi diferiti, precum aceste minciuni sunt mai ales in
contradictie cu legea si logica juridica pe care trebuie sa se intameieze toate actele juridice. Prospectul
Invega precizez infatiseaza sute de efecte negative permanente documentate stiintific inclusiv moartea
si nici un efect pozitiv documentat stiintific tocmai fiindca este o otrava, o neurotoxina bazata pe fluor
care nu are nici o functie biologica. Invega este de notorietate conform prospectului o neurotoxina
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 233 of 403

promovata de o companie americana ca tratament pentru schizofrenie, companie condamnata repetat


pentru comercializarea de otravuri drept medicamente conform evidentei publice din enciclopedia de
pe internet wikipedia.com care referentiaza din presa si evidenta publica a sistemului judiciar SUA
numeroase procese pierdute de aceasta companie, precum si realitatea puternicei otravuri Invega care
provoaca dizabilitati permanente de invatare si memorare ceea ce se coreleaza cu actul criminal de a ma
aresta ilegal de la examenele la facultatea de drept in baza unor proceduri vadit ilegale, corelat cu actul
criminal de a intenta actiunea de obligarea mea la tratament medical 12718/231/2017 exact in sesiunea
de restante septembrie 2017 pentru a ma impiedica sa continui sa-mi iau examenele la facultatea de
drept. Procedurile mentionate sub pretextul carora m-au detinut ilegal si Vatamat corporal sunt
falsificate precum demonstrez pe scurt prin realitatea de drept ca doar fata de suspectii si acuzatii de
omor sau pruncucidere se poate dispune expertiza psihiatrica cf. art. 184 (1) din CPP si chiar si atunci
aceasta fiind posibila doar cu consimtamantul acestora, altfel cf. art. 4 (2) din CPP orice indoiala a
procurorului se interpreteaza in favoarea suspectului sau inculpatului. Exista numeroase alte moduri de
a demonstra gravele abuzuri savarsite de ceea ce se poate numi mafia magistratilor si tortionarii lor
“politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici” s.a.m.d., demonstratii pe care le-am anexat la dosarele penale
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 sub forma unei plangeri penale prealabile impotriva asa-
ziselor organe judiciare din dosar, reclamanti si alti complici si instigatori precum in cazul de notorietate
d-l Berbeceanu si-a incriminat si ulterior condamnat acuzatorii mincinosi. Evident nici unul din
diagnostice nu e schizofrenia ca sa fiu “tratat” pentru schizofrenie cu otrava neurotoxica pe baza de
fluor Invega deci iarasi aceasta este o dovada a falsificarii acestui document, precum insusi faptul ca
declararea ca studentia la facultatea de drept e “psihoza acuta predominant deliranta” si “paranoia
premorbida” prin faptul ca detentia psihiatrica este relevanta doar la momentul constatarii necesitatii
atentiei psihiatrice adica in prezent cf. art. 122 din Regulamentul de ordine interioara al Socola Iasi, este
vadit o aberatie a regimului totalitar impus de mafia magistratilor in Romania, dat fiind ca n-am fost
intrebat nimic din dosarele 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 sau in legatura cu
acestea ci am fost arestat de la examenele la facultatea de drept legat si otravit precum s-a retinut in
fisa de externare pe care o retin drept proba inscris a acestei stari de fapt impreuna cu procesul verbal al
celor 3 securisti in civil care m-au arestat de la Scoala generala “Anghel Saligny” Focsani unde urma sa
sustin examenele la centrul Universitatii Ecologice, iar continutul fisei falsificate de externare insusi n-
are nici o legatura cu raspunsurile mele la testele psihologice, precum nici macar la audierea
contrafacuta a Comisiei de evaluare a temeiniciei internaarii nevoluntare care trebuia sa ma puna in
libertate conform legii si evidentelor nu s-a interesat de vadita mea nevinovatie ci membrii acesteia au
mintit acuzandu-ma ca “sunt pericol public” fara nici o dovada sau logica, incalcandu-mi prezumtia de
nevinovatie cf. art. 6 (2) din CEDO, si ca sa-si justifice crimele, precum pentru musamalizarea minciunilor
lor nu mi-au comunicat procesul verbal intocmit nici restul actelor “medicale” si alte evidente pe care le-
au falsificat pentru otravirea mea;
constituie o incalcare a art. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din
Protocolul 12 al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale prin tracasarea mea psihologica implicit
psihosomatica si santajarea mea prin folosirea psihiatriei ca arma de represiune nedreapta si
amenintarea cu lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal, supunerea la rele tratamente si vatamarea
corporala prin otravirea cu neurotoxine, in realitate neexistand tratamente psihiatrice, fluorul si clorul
din asa-zisele medicamente fiind neurotoxine nu tratamente. Grupul infractional organizat alcatuit din
mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici legisti” si altii care se comporta
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 234 of 403

ca niste gangsteri si tortionari in relatie cu mafia magistratilor, ma discrimineaza si-mi ingradesc


libertatea de constiinta chiar pe motivul ca sunt un cetatean onest credincios ordinii de drept ce
incomodeaza activitatea criminala a “magistratilor” ce ma persecuta abuzand de functia publica
utilizand sistemul judiciar, fortele de ordine si psihiatria ca arme de represiune nedreapta
4. certificatul medico-legal psihiatric din 08.06.2017, ce nu mi s-a comunicat in mod ilegal cf.
art. 94 (2)(8) din CPP si art. 58 din Legea 487/2002 pentru a ma impiedica sa-l denunt penal, la comisia
de malpraxis si civil, disciplinar la colegiul medicilor, si sa le contest administrativ la institutul de
medicina legala superior - conform principiului contradictorialitatii orice probe care nu sunt supuse
dezbaterilor in contradictoriu deasemenea nu sunt admisibile, in materie penala cf. art. 349 si art. 351
din CPP. In fapt, am fost dus cu forta iarasi pentru a treia oara (prima oara pe 17.09.2015 si a doua oara
pe 06.04.2017) la Comisia de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica din cadrul SML Vrancea pe data de
08.06.2017 dupa ce am fost drogat cu neurotoxinele Haloperidol, Diazepam, Invega si Prazolex 12 zile la
rand motiv pentru care in ultimul examen psihologic am performat doar 98 IQ ceea ce atesta Vatamarea
mea corporala deoarece in conditii normale pot performa in testele de inteligenta 110-120 IQ superficial
si peste 140 concentrat precum am performat la recrutare si incorporare la armata, in diverse teste ale
medicinei muncii sau de pe internet, putand prezenta probe inscrisuri in acest sens. Prospectul Invega
precizez infatiseaza sute de efecte negative permanente documentate stiintific inclusiv moartea si nici
un efect pozitiv documentat stiintific. La aceasta falsa examinare din urma fara sa ma intrebe nimic din
dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 asa-zisul psihiatru Lucasievici Silviu a delirat ca “e
clar” si m-au trimis inapoi la Sectia de psihiatrie a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon” sub paza ca un criminal
periculos, fara sa fi savarsit vreo infractiune sau sa existe prezumtia legala ca am savarsit vreo
infractiune sau fapta imorala macar;
constituie o incalcare a art. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din
Protocolul 12 al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale prin tracasarea mea psihologica implicit
psihosomatica si santajarea mea prin folosirea psihiatriei ca arma de represiune nedreapta si
amenintarea cu lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal, supunerea la rele tratamente si vatamarea
corporala prin otravirea cu neurotoxine, in realitate neexistand tratamente psihiatrice, fluorul si clorul
din asa-zisele medicamente fiind neurotoxine nu tratamente. Grupul infractional organizat alcatuit din
mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici legisti” si altii care se comporta
ca niste gangsteri si tortionari in relatie cu mafia magistratilor, ma discrimineaza si-mi ingradesc
libertatea de constiinta chiar pe motivul ca sunt un cetatean onest credincios ordinii de drept ce
incomodeaza activitatea criminala a “magistratilor” ce ma persecuta abuzand de functia publica
utilizand sistemul judiciar, fortele de ordine si psihiatria ca arme de represiune nedreapta
5. orice acte “medicale” din dosarele in atentia instantei necomunicate mie in mod ilegal cf.
art. 94 (2)(8) din CPP si art. 58 din Legea 487/2002 special pentru a ma impiedica sa le denunt penal, la
comisia de malpraxis si civil, disciplinar la colegiul medicilor, si sa le contest administrativ la institutul de
medicina legala superior - conform principiului contradictorialitatii orice probe care nu sunt supuse
dezbaterilor in contradictoriu deasemenea nu sunt admisibile, in materie penala cf. art. 349 si art. 351
din CPP. Deoarece orice acte medicale din aceste dosare precum am demonstrat in fapt si de drept nu
sunt legale, si nu sunt bazate pe fapte prin urmare nu pot fi temeinice precum nu pot exista efecte fara
cauze, ceea ce totodata determina invaliditatea actului juridic in sine pentru nerespectarea logicii
juridice, in concluzie acestea nu pot fi decat nule de drept cf. art. 280 si art. 282 din CPP inainte sa fie si
inadmisibile de drept cf. art. 349 si 351 din CPP;
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 235 of 403

constituie o incalcare a art. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din


Protocolul 12 al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale prin tracasarea mea psihologica implicit
psihosomatica si santajarea mea prin folosirea psihiatriei ca arma de represiune nedreapta si
amenintarea cu lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal, supunerea la rele tratamente si vatamarea
corporala prin otravirea cu neurotoxine, in realitate neexistand tratamente psihiatrice, fluorul si clorul
din asa-zisele medicamente fiind neurotoxine nu tratamente. Grupul infractional organizat alcatuit din
mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici legisti” si altii care se comporta
ca niste gangsteri si tortionari in relatie cu mafia magistratilor, ma discrimineaza si-mi ingradesc
libertatea de constiinta chiar pe motivul ca sunt un cetatean onest credincios ordinii de drept ce
incomodeaza activitatea criminala a “magistratilor” ce ma persecuta abuzand de functia publica
utilizand sistemul judiciar, fortele de ordine si psihiatria ca arme de represiune nedreapta
6. referatul cu propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical din 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si
4329/P/2016, in care asa-zisul procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian bineinteles nu retine ca a atunci cand a
inceput urmarirea penala, continuat urmarirea penala si pus in miscare actiunea penala precum si in
privinta tuturor celorlalte acte de procedura, a falsificat ordonantele si actele de procedura in flagrant
prin faptul ca nu le-a motivat in fapt si de drept cf. art. 286 (2) d) din CPP dar in primul rand fiindca a
incalcat legea refuzand sa consemneze si sa administreze probele cf. art. 5 (2) din CPP, precum atesta
ordonantele de inceperea si continuarea urmaririi penale din 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016
care nu contin nici o demonstratie precum le-am vizionat in toamna 2016, iar dosarele nu contine nici
OPIS-ul probelor si nici demonstratia sau investigatia organului de urmarire penala care sa justifice pe
baza probelor ordonantele falsificate sau ce reprezinta si ce relevanta au probele, tocmai fiindca este
imposibil de justificat incalcarea legii iar probele din dosar demonstreaza nevinovatia mea precum insusi
refuzul asa-ziselor organe judiciare de a le administra demonstreaza rea-credinta acestora si conform
principiului non-contradictiei este demonstrata iarasi nevinovatia mea;
constituie o incalcare a art. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din
Protocolul 12 al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale prin tracasarea mea psihologica implicit
psihosomatica si santajarea mea prin folosirea psihiatriei ca arma de represiune nedreapta si
amenintarea cu lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal, supunerea la rele tratamente si vatamarea
corporala prin otravirea cu neurotoxine, in realitate neexistand tratamente psihiatrice, fluorul si clorul
din asa-zisele medicamente fiind neurotoxine nu tratamente. Grupul infractional organizat alcatuit din
mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici legisti” si altii care se comporta
ca niste gangsteri si tortionari in relatie cu mafia magistratilor, ma discrimineaza si-mi ingradesc
libertatea de constiinta chiar pe motivul ca sunt un cetatean onest credincios ordinii de drept ce
incomodeaza activitatea criminala a “magistratilor” ce ma persecuta abuzand de functia publica
utilizand sistemul judiciar, fortele de ordine si psihiatria ca arme de represiune nedreapta

si solicit sa constatati deasemenea ca toate aceste asa-zise acte juridice / judiciare sunt nule de
drept cf. art. 280 si art. 282 din CPP fiindca sunt nelegale, netemeinice si falsificate cu rea-credinta
criminala, precum le declar pe propria raspundere si precum demonstrez in continuare pe scurt si in
detaliu la sectiunea I, motiv pentru care invoc nulitatea acestor acte, si

sa solicit sa constatati actiunea inregistrata in dosarul 12718/231/2017:


ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 236 of 403

1. inadmisibila precum ordonanta identica in fapt de obligarea mea la tratament medical


provizoriu din 14277/231/2015 bazata pe acuzatii ca am savarsit fapte fictive a fost constatata
inadmisibila si nefondata datorita faptului ca la fel ca si acum nici atunci nu a existat nici un certificat
medico-legal temeinic si legitim deoarece acestea au fost falsificate in lipsa mea si fara acordul meu de a
fi expertizat si prin urmare acestea sunt nule de drept fiindca sunt vadit ilegale si netemeinice precum
am demonstrat in prezenta ca si-n 14277/231/2015 deoarece nu se bazeaza pe fapte reale ci pe
concluzii aberante, adesea contradictorii si lipsite de premize ceea ce deasemenea invalideaza aceste
asa-zise acte juridice pentru nerespectarea logicii juridice. Reamintesc, expertizarea psihiatrica este
posibila doar prin interviu cf. art. 10 (1) din Legea 487/2002 pe care l-am refuzat cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP
precum este retinut in ordonanta falsificata de clasare din 01.08.2017 din 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si
4329/P/2016 deasemenea stiind ca astfel obtin un temei de nulitate a actelor juridice ce urmau sa fie
falsificate, si, expertizarea psihiatrica este legala doar fata de suspectii sau acuzatii de omor sau
pruncucidere cf. art. 184 (1) din CPP, articol existent pentru a deroga de la faptul ca orice indoieli ale
procurorului se interpreteaza intotdeauna in favoarea suspectului sau inculpatului cf. art. 4 (2) din CPP
privind prezumtia de nevinovatie, motiv pentru care art. 184 (1) din CPP prezinta o conditie
suplimentara in conjunctie cu indoiala procurorului si conditia ca obiectul dosarului sa-l faca omorul sau
pruncuciderea, aceasta fiind logica propozitionala a legii si ratiunea existentei acestui articol oricum
neconstitutional cf. art. 22 din CR. Propunerea de obligarea mea la tratament medical din
12718/231/2017 esste inadmisibila deoarece este nelegal introdusa adica propunerea este lipsita de
orice motivare in fapt si de drept cf. art. 286 (2) din CPP in conditiile legii, lipsita de orice probe ceea ce
infatiseaza motivul imposibilitatii procurorului de a motiva in fapt si de drept deoarece nu se poate
construi acuzarea mea pe probe care demonstreaza nevinovatia mea,
precum actiunea este lipsita si de orice act medical legal, valid si veridic, coroborat cu faptul ca
nici macar prin reducere la absurd faptele fictive de care sunt acuzat adica ascultarea la casti de carti
audio vadit nu justifica abuzul grav al “organelor judiciare” si “psihiatrilor” de a ma otravi cu neurotoxine
pe baza de fluor si clor pentru a ma face leguma precum am fost amenintat de apropiatii clicii criminale
care a inventat aceste dosare, precum si avertizat de prieteni care cunosc faptul ca sistemul criminal
represiv din Vrancea este acelasi ca pe vremea lui Ceausecu daca nu chiar mai rau, iar
atestarea faptului ca actele “medicale” sunt falsificate este si ca am fost arestat din examenele
la facultatea de drept a Universitatii Ecologice pe 27.05.2017 de la Scoala generala “Anghel Saligny”
Focsani, legat si fara diagnostic am fost injectat si Vatamat corporal cu neurotoxinele pe baza de clor si
fluor Haloperidol, Diazepam, Invega si Prazolex, precum in acest scop deliberat s-a evitat intrunirea
Comisiei de etica deoarece o crima n-are nici o etica evident, precum in scest scop deliberat s-a evitat
intocmirea actului obligatoriu a reprezentantei conventionale cu mama mea care evident ar fi
consemnat refuzul de a mi se administra otravuri, iar Comisia care trebuia sa determine ilegalitatea si
netemeinicia internarii mele nevoluntare a mintit ca “sunt pericol public” incalcandu-mi prezumtia de
nevinovatie cf. art. 6 (2) din CEDO, nefiind macar vreodata condamnat pentru ceva in viata mea, ceea ce
demonstreaza ca “psihiatrii” vranceni nu sunt altceva decat tortionarii mafiei magistratilor. Deasemenea
mentionez si faptul ca la toate asa-zisele expertize medico-legale psihiatrice n-am fost reprezentat legal
cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP deoarece aceasta veritabila mafie evident n-are decat dispret fata de lege si
ordinea de drept. Prospectul Invega precizez infatiseaza sute de efecte negative permanente
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 237 of 403

documentate stiintific inclusiv moartea si nici un efect pozitiv documentat stiintific, si precum
reamintesc compania ce comercializeaza Invega, adesea condamnata conform presei pentru
comercializarea de otravuri drept medicamente, pretinde ca Invega trateaza schizofrenia pentru care
nici macar n-am fost diagnosticat in documentele falsificate de “psihiatrii”
2. netemeinica deoarece este introdusa in baza unor inscrisuri vadit falsificate precum am
demonstrat mai sus si prin urmare nimic de care sunt acuzat sau ce se declara fals in aceste documente
false nu poate fi inferat in mod valid despre mine deoarece nu exista premize valide adica nici faptele nu
exista fizic, arhiprobat prin marturii, probele materiale audio ale sedintelor de judecata, declaratiile
mele si alte probe declarate la dosar si neconsemnate si neadministrate cu rea-credinta de “organele
judiciare”, precum nici premiza universala nu s-a respectat adica legea. Din premize false inferenta
judiciara nu poate fi decat falsa, ori in mod vadit aceasta este si intentia criminala
3. neconstitutionala cf. art. 11 si art. 20 din CR deoarece mi s-au incalcat in flagrant drepturile
din CEDO art. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din Protocolul 12 al CEDO si a
libertatilor fundamentale prin tracasarea mea psihologica implicit psihosomatica si Santajarea mea prin
folosirea psihiatriei ca arma de represiune nedreapta si Amenintarea cu Lipsirea de libertate in mod
ilegal, Supunerea la rele tratamente si Vatamarea corporala prin otravirea cu neurotoxine, in realitate
neexistand tratamente psihiatrice, fluorul si clorul din asa-zisele medicamente fiind neurotoxine nu
tratamente. Grupul infractional organizat alcatuit din mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”,
“jandarmi”, “medici legisti” si altii care se comporta ca niste gangsteri si tortionari in relatie cu mafia
magistratilor, ma discrimineaza si-mi ingradesc libertatea de constiinta chiar pe motivul ca sunt un
cetatean onest credincios ordinii de drept ce incomodeaza activitatea criminala a “magistratilor” ce ma
persecuta abuzand de functia publica utilizand sistemul judiciar, fortele de ordine si psihiatria ca arme
de represiune nedreapta.
Pentru demonstrarea suplimentara a neconstitutionalitatii obligarii mele la tratament medical
pentru fapte fictive cum ar fi tulburarea linistii prin ascultarea de carti audio la casti si gesturi si cuvinte
de ocara fictive conform marturiilor, probelor materiale audio-video a inregistrarilor audio si alte probe
din dosar cum ar fi declaratiile mele pe propria raspundere pentru care n-am fost acuzat de Falsul in
declaratii deci “organele judiciare” recunosc ca spun adevarul si sunt nevinovat, am formulat doua cereri
de sesizare a Curtii Constitutionale in care am invocat exceptia de neconstitutionalitate a art. 315 (2) e)
din CPP deoarece nu se poate vorbi de existenta infractiunii in faza urmaririi penale fiindca procurorul
nu are capacitatea juridica de a aprecia aceasta si precum se vede nici capacitatea mintala in general in
Romania fiindca daca un singur procuror infractor este tolerat in sistemul judiciar romanesc inseamna ca
asa-zisa toleranta este de fapt intentie criminala si complicitate la infractiunile acelui “procuror” iar
aceasta inseamna ca intreg corpul functionarilor Ministerului Public cel putin este corupt, fiindca acesta
este tolerat atat de colegi cat si pe scara ierarhica, respectiv, am invocat exceptia de
neconstitutionalitate a art. 566-572 din CPP deoarece “tratamentul” psihiatric nu este altceva decat
Vatamare corporala ceea ce contravine direct art. 22 din CR “Dreptul la viaţă, precum şi dreptul la
integritate fizică şi psihică ale persoanei sunt garantate. Nimeni nu poate fi supus torturii şi
nici unui fel de pedeapsă sau de tratament inuman ori degradant”. Pentru acest motiv solicit si
constatarea incalcarii art. 3 din CEDO
4. de rea-credinta criminala deoarece autorii inscrisurilor vadit falsificate urmaresc evident
punerea mea intr-o situatie de vulnerabilitate pentru vatamarea sanatatii mele fizice si psihice prin
injectarea sau administrarea fortata de substante toxice, aceasta actiune demonstrand adevarata
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 238 of 403

intentie a acestui grup infractional organizat care a incercat reducerea mea la tacere mai intai prin
instigarea interlopului Herghelegiu Danut care pe 27.10.2014 si 05.12.2014 a savarsite tentativa de
Omor calificat si Vatamarea corporala lovindu-ma in cap si aruncandu-ma pe treptele scarii blocului in
stare de inconstienta, si fiindca am demonstrat ca instigatorul principal e asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela
de la Judecatoria Focsani, acesta a intentat impotriva mea punerea sub interdictie 15730/231/2014 pe
care a pierdut-o, dosarul penal 2417/P/2014 din care a instigat la internarea me nevoluntara
11224/231/2015 in care clica sa criminala a pierdut la contestatie apoi obligarea mea la tratament
medical 14277/231/2015 in care au pierdut si la fond si la contestatie, motiv pentru care ulterior chiar in
dosarele in care am demonstrat ca 2417/P/2014, 10547/231/2015, 11224/231/2015 si 14277/231/2015
sunt falsificate au inventat dosarele penale 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 inscenandu-ma
si in mod identic au falsificat procedura pentru a ma Vatama corporal in scopul de a ma impiedica sa
continui urmarirea lor penala pentru crimele savarsite impotriva mea prin folosirea sistemului judiciar,
fortelor de ordine si a psihiatriei ca arme de represiune nedreapta

Reamintesc completului de judecata ca am declarat pe propria raspundere falsificate:


1. asa-zisele acte medicale din dosarele 12718/231/2017, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si
4329/P/2016 dar si 2417/P/2014, si
2. propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical,
precum demonstrez in prezenta in fapt si de drept, motiv pentru care solicit completului de
judecata sa intocmeasca un proces verbal, si sa-l inainteze la Parchetul de pe langa Curtea de Apel
Galati, precum si parchetului general si sectiilor autonome DNA si DIICOT, de drept cf. art. 61 si cf. art.
291 din CPP penala pe care le citez, deoarece in mod contrar completul de judecata a dosarului
12718/231/2017 se incrimineaza pentru infractiunea de Omisiunii sesizarii cf. art. 267 din CP si
complicitatea la infractiunile autorilor documentelor dovedite falsificate:

Codul de procedura penala


Art. 61 - Actele incheiate de unele organe de constatare
(1) Ori de cate ori exista o suspiciune rezonabila cu privire la savarsirea unei infractiuni, sunt obligate sa
intocmeasca un proces-verbal despre imprejurarile constatate:
a) organele inspectiilor de stat, ale altor organe de stat, precum si ale autoritatilor publice, institutiilor
publice sau ale altor persoane juridice de drept public, pentru infractiunile care constituie incalcari ale
dispozitiilor si obligatiilor a caror respectare o controleaza, potrivit legii;
...
(2) Organele prevazute la alin. (1) au obligatia sa ia masuri de conservare a locului savarsirii infractiunii
si de ridicare sau conservare a mijloacelor materiale de proba. In cazul infractiunilor flagrante, aceleasi
organe au dreptul de a face perchezitii corporale sau ale vehiculelor, de a-l prinde pe faptuitor si de a-l
prezenta de indata organelor de urmarire penala.
(3) Cand faptuitorul sau persoanele prezente la locul constatarii au de facut obiectii ori precizari sau au
de dat explicatii cu privire la cele consemnate in procesul-verbal, organul de constatare are obligatia de a
le consemna in procesul-verbal.
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 239 of 403

(4) Actele incheiate impreuna cu mijloacele materiale de proba se inainteaza, de indata, organelor de
urmarire penala.
(5) Procesul-verbal incheiat in conformitate cu prevederile alin. (1) constituie act de sesizare a organelor
de urmarire penala si nu poate fi supus controlului pe calea contenciosului administrativ.

Codul de procedura penala


Art. 291 - Sesizarile facute de persoane cu functii de conducere si de alte persoane
(1) Orice persoana cu functie de conducere in cadrul unei autoritati a administratiei publice sau in cadrul
altor autoritati publice, institutii publice ori al altor persoane juridice de drept public, precum si orice
persoana cu atributii de control, care, in exercitarea atributiilor lor, au luat cunostinta de savarsirea unei
infractiuni pentru care actiunea penala se pune in miscare din oficiu, sunt obligate sa sesizeze de indata
organul de urmarire penala si sa ia masuri pentru ca urmele infractiunii, corpurile delicte si orice alte
mijloace de proba sa nu dispara.
(2) Orice persoana care exercita un serviciu de interes public pentru care a fost investita de autoritatile
publice sau care este supusa controlului ori supravegherii acestora cu privire la indeplinirea respectivului
serviciu de interes public, care in exercitarea atributiilor sale a luat cunostinta de savarsirea unei
infractiuni pentru care actiunea penala se pune in miscare din oficiu, este obligata sa sesizeze de indata
organul de urmarire penala.

Cu mentiunea ca infractiunile pentru care actiunea penala se pune in miscare din oficiu, sunt
infractiunile flagrante, in general care nu se pun in miscare la plangerea penala a partii vatamate,
conform opiniei unor avocati
Cu aceasta ocazie rog completul de judecata sa ia act si de faptul ca raportul de expertiza
medico-legala psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232 din presupusa data de 17.09.2015 din 2417/P/2014 contine
un diagnostic prezumtiv, deoarece inafara de faptul ca este vadit falsificat, este inscris cu, citez “cel mai
probabil”, precum poate constata completul de judecata la fila 103 din dosarul 14277/231/2015
reprezentand ultima fila din raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232 din
presupusa data de 17.09.2015. Deoarece aceiasi “medici” au intocmit toate asa-zisele certificate
medico-legale psihiatrice este vadita alienarea mintala a acestora din incoerenta in motivarea acestora
despre care reamintesc aberatii cum ar fi ca au declarat ca am studii superioare, gandire rapida, cultura
generala si sunt lipsit concomitent de discernamant, sau ca am istoric judiciar adica cazier penal ceea ce
e evident o minciuna. Deoarece toate asa-zisele acte medicale au fost falsificate de aceiasi autori privind
fapte fictive, evident acestea trebuie sa corespunda insa nu corespund tocmai fiindca precum se spune
popular ca minciuna are picioare scurte, memoria mincinosilor este scurta ca si mintea lor si sunt
incoerenti in ticluirea de acte false, deopotriva in continutul fiecarui act falsificate precum si comparativ
actele falsificate sunt incoerente intre ele dar si cu realitatea vadita a dosarelor tocmai fiindca sunt
falsificate grosolan tipic caracterului grobian al falsificatorilor
Inafara de faptul ca tulburarile de personalitate nu sunt tratabile medical asa cum voi demonstra
in baza literaturii de specialitate in psihiatrie si proba materiala audio-video sarlatania asa-zisilor medici
legisti psihiatri consumata in scopul de a ma vatama prin injectarea cu substante toxice sau in alte
moduri,
propunerea ca trebuie sa fiu obligat la tratament medical pentru ca psihiatrii mint ca n-am
discernamant nu face obiectul art. 566-572 din CPP deoarece exemplificativ si drept dovada prin
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 240 of 403

reducere la absurd ca aberatiile “psihiatrilor” ar fi adevaruri, totusi o persoana lipsita de discernamant


nu se poate orienta pentru ca “sa se prezinte de indata la unitatea sanitara la care urmeaza sa i se
efectueze tratamentul” ceea ce iarasi demonstreaza prostia incomensurabila a acestor “psihiatri” lipsiti
de discernamant in sensul inabilitatii de a formula chiar si un plan criminal, si care declara efectiv ca au
tratament pentru lipsa de discernamant ceea ce este vadit absurd si iarasi demonstreaza ca au falsificat
toate documentele in care au declarat aceasta pentru ca este o inferenta imposibila si de-ar exista prin
absurd o pastila antiprostie adica pentru discernamant ar lua-o toata lumea. Aberant bineinteles este si
“tratamentul” falsei lipse de discernamant cu neurotoxine de natura sa creeze lipsa de discernamant,
motiv pentru care am constatat art. 566-572 din CPP neconstitutionale formuland cerere de sesizarea
Curtii Constitutionale, deoarece mi-a fost incalcat in flagrant dreptul la integritate fizică şi psihică cf. art.
22 din CR si cf. art. 3 din CEDO prin intentarea unei actiuni in obligarea mea sa fiu otravit cu neurotoxina
pe baza de fluor Invega a carui prospect infatiseaza sute de efecte negative permanente documentate
stiintific inclusiv moartea si nici un efect pozitiv documentat stiintific, prin care mi s-a incalcat dreptul la
viata cf. art. 2 din CEDO precum mi s-a incalcat dreptul la prezumtia de nevinovatie stabilit prin art. 23
(11) din Constitutia Romaniei, art. 6 (2) din Conventia Europeana a Drepturilor Omului si art. 11 din
Declaratia Universala a Drepturilor Omului, pe care le invoc cf. 11 din CR privind obligatia statului
roman de a respecta tratatele la care a aderat

In preambulul invocarii exceptiilor procesuale si de fond, va aduc la cunostinta faptul ca,


deoarece asa-zisul procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian a avut un episod maniacal crezandu-se judecator m-a
condamnat pentru o infractiune care n-am savarsit-o prin ordonanta de clasare nelegala si netemeinica
din 01.08.2017 din dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 in care a mintit vadit ca am
savarsit infractiunea de Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei deoarece probele marturii si probe materiale
audio a inregistrarilor de sedinta imi demonstreaza nevinovatia, precum si faptul ca asa-zisul procuror a
refuzat sa consemneze si sa administreze probatoriul inclusiv pentru acuzare deoarece-i este imposibil
sa foloseasca probe ce-mi demonstreaza nevinovatia pentru a-mi demonstra vinovatia, iarasi imi
demonstraza nevinovatia, precum si lipsa premizelor din propozitiile categorice si silogismul motivarii
ordonantei imi demonstreaza nevinovatia si faptul ca ordonanta este falsificata adica deopotriva ilegala
continand numeroase si vadite incalcari ale legii, netemeinica datorita invaliditatii sau lipsei motivarii in
fapt si de drept, si de rea-credinta criminala facand referire la alte acte juridice vadit falsificate de niste
asa-zisi psihiatri si medici legisti precum dealtfel am demonstrat in prezenta,
constat ca nu am nici macar la modul tehnic calitatea de inculpat in dosarele 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 deoarece sunt nevinovat pentru multitudinea de motive in fapt si de drept
invocate mai sus, adica in mod nelegal si netemeinic am fost acuzat si urmarit penal peste 12 luni in
scopul de a fi santajat apoi vatamat corporal pentru a fi redus la tacere cu privire la denunturile mele in
legatura cu activitatea criminala a acelorasi asa-zise organe judiciare care m-au acuzat si urmarit
netemeinic, implicit in dosarul 12718/231/2017 nu am calitatatea de inculpat, si evident nici calitatea
intimat, infractor sau recidivist sau orice alta calitate decat cea de nevinovat, motiv pentru care solicit sa
mi va adresati cu calitatea de nevinovat, precum solicit ca aceasta calitate sa fie consemnata in
evidenta informatizata care apare pe saitul Judecatoriei Focsani, pentru a se cunoaste public ca in
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 241 of 403

calitate de nevinovat grupul infractional din Focsani urmareste vatamarea sau uciderea mea sub
pretextul obligarii la tratament medical.
Asa-zisul procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian mi-a incalcat in flagrant dreptul fundamental al
prezumtiei de nevinovatie stabilit prin art. 4 si art. 99 din CPP, 23 (11) din CR si tratatele ratificate de
Romania adica cf. art. 6 (2) din CEDO si art. 11 din Declaratia Universala a Drepturilor Omului, mintind
ca am savarsit infractiunea de Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei prin care se subintelege ca am fost
condamnat printr-o hotarare definitiva, precum a si instigat pe asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici Silviu si
alti coautori care au falsificat mai multe rapoarte de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica, mintind ca n-am
discernamant, ca sunt violent, ca am istoric judiciar prin care se subintelege ca am cazier penal s.a.m.d.
In dovedirea incalcarii prezumtiei de nevinovatie pe langa demonstratia in fapt sau premiza
particulara a silogismului acestei intampinari invoc legea sau premiza universala:

art. 11 din Declaratia Universala a Drepturilor Omului


Orice persoana acuzata de comiterea unui act cu caracter penal are dreptul sa fie presupusa
nevinovata pina cind vinovatia sa va fi stabilita in mod legal in cursul unui proces public in care i-au fost
asigurate toate garantiile necesare apararii sale.

art. 6 (2) din Conventia Europeana a Drepturilor Omului


Orice persoană acuzată de o infracţiune este prezumată nevinovată pînă ce vinovăţia sa va fi
legal stabilită

art. 23 (11) din Constitutia Romaniei


Până la rămânerea definitivă a hotărârii judecătoreşti de condamnare, persoana este
considerată nevinovată.

Codul de procedura penala


art. 4
Orice persoană este considerată nevinovată până la stabilirea vinovăţiei sale printr-o hotărâre
penală definitivă.

art. 99
Suspectul sau inculpatul beneficiază de prezumţia de nevinovăţie, nefiind obligat să îşi
dovedească nevinovăţia, şi are dreptul de a nu contribui la propria acuzare.

Nu in ultimul rand, evident infaptuirea justitiei este prerogativa exclusiva a judecatorului,


neputand fi condamnat de un procuror.
In dovedire invoc legea

Art. 2 din Legea 304/2004 privind organizarea judiciara


(2) Justiţia se realizează prin următoarele instanţe judecătoreşti:
a) Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie;
b) curţi de apel;
c) tribunale;
d) tribunale specializate;
e) instanţe militare;
f) judecătorii.
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 242 of 403

Art. 1. din Legea 303/2004 privind statutul magistratilor


Magistratura este activitatea judiciară desfăşurată d e judecători în scopul înfăptuirii justiţiei şi de
procurori în scopul apărării intereselor generale ale societăţii, a ordinii de drept, precum şi a drepturilor
şi libertăţilor cetăţenilor.

Este evident faptul ca am fost urmarit penal in dosarele inventate 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si
4329/P/2016 pentru ca asa-zisele organele judiciare sa savarseasca abuzuri impotriva mea, deoarece
fapta nu exista si atunci evident probele impotriva mea nu exista, coroborat cu faptul ca toate probele
din dosar imi demonstreaza nevinovatia si conform principiului non-contradictiei nu-mi pot dovedi
vinovatia in acelasi timp si sub acelasi raport

In consecinta deoarece nu am calitate procesuala in dosarul 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si


4329/P/2016 datorita aberatiei neconstitutionale a clasarii care a incheiat urmarirea penala fara
condamnare sau achitare, implicit n-am calitate procesuala pasiva in dosarul 12718/231/2017 atat
datorita clasarii cat si datorita dreptului la prezumtia de nevinovatie cf. art. 23 (11) din CR si art. 6 (2) din
CEDO conform caruia nu pot fi obligat la “tratament medical” psihiatric adica sa fiu vatamat corporal
pentru fapte care nu le-am savarsit comform prezumtiei de nevinovatie, precum si fiindca acuzatiile sunt
fictive, motiv pentru care rog completul de judecata a dosarului 12718/231/2017 sa ia act ca nu am
calitate procesuala pasiva deoarece nu am si nu pot avea nici calitatea de suspect, nici de inculpat, nici
de condamnat ci doar aceea de nevinovat, motiv pentru care

A. invoc exceptia inadmisibilitatii propunerii de obligarea mea la tratament medical, deoarece


cf. art. 107 in particular, si art. 108-109 din CP, numai condamnatii pot fi obligati la tratament medical
obligatoriu, respectiv cf. art. 184 (1) din CPP, doar condamnatii pentru omor sau pruncucidere SI (nu
“sau”) doar la propunerea procurorului motivata in fapt si de drept cf. art. 286 (2) d) din CPP deci nu
falsificata, si conform jurisprudentei din dosarul 907/307/2010 coroborata cu principiul dreptului unitar
cf. art. 124 din CR si coroborata cu art. 107 din CP, doar daca se justifica stiintific periculozitatea
condamnatului de a recidiva, respectiv fiind imposibila d.p.d.v. legal expertizarea psihiatrica fara
consimtamantul liber al expertizatului cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP si art. 11 din Legea 487/2002, dar si
obligarea la tratament medical deoarece evident incarcerarea condamnatului rezolva aceeasi problema
a prevenirii fenomenului infractionalitatii, si dreptul la viata si integritatea fizica si psihica cf. art. 22 din
CR este inalienabil sau garantat in dreptul romanesc
Exceptie face cazul lipsei de discernamant insa doar stabilita legal si temeinic, ceea ce nu
inseamna ca exista tratament pentru lipsa de discernamant evident deoarece daca ar exista o pastila
contra prostiei evident toata lumea ar lua-o. In realitate psihiatria este o sarlatanie notorie, care
trateaza simptomele si nu boala in cel mai bun caz, motiv pentru care asa-zisele organe judiciare din
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 dar si 2417/P/2014 mint obsesiv ca nu am discernamant si
sunt violent pentru a falsifica realitatea, fara nici o proba macar circustantiala, si l-au instigat pe asa-zisul
medic-legist Lucasievici Silviu sa minta ca am “(cel mai probabil) ... discernamant mult diminuat”, ca
studentia la facultatea de drept e “psihoza acuta predominant deliranta” si “paranoia premorbida”
(proba de prostie a ezoteriei psihiatrice fiindca daca tulburarea paranoida de personalitate e
prin absurd o boala ceea ce nu exista in realitate, premorbid inseamna inainte de boala adica sanatate,
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 243 of 403

adica aceasta exprimare este o contradictie care probeaza lipsa de discernamant a celor care o folosesc,
ori “psihoza acuta” si “predominant deliranta” este un silogism, ambele grupari de termeni avand relativ
acelasi inteles ceea ce iarasi demonstreaza ca acesti sarlatani habar n-au ce spun)
in timp ce deasemenea a retinut ca am studii superioare, gandire rapida, cultura generala
s.a.m.d., evident asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici Silviu neavand nici macar discernamant in calitate de
infractor, incriminandu-se penal prin propriul fals intelectual.
Mai mult coroborez cu evidenta de notorietate a sanatatii mele mintale prin faptul ca lucrand 4
(patru) ani ca Programator IT (cf. COR) la SC ROMANIA HYPERMARCHE SA (CORA) si ALTEN SI-TEHNO,
am acumulat 4 (patru) certificate de medicina muncii care atesta ca sunt sanatos psihic si apt de munca,
precum pot chema martori, printre care chiar Dutescu Mircea Mihai din Focsani care facea crize ca
membru al Comisiei urland ca “sunt pericol public” fiindca neavand argumente valide ci fiind un
tortionar troglodit a ridicat vocea ca sa-mi acopere explicatiile privind faptul ca sunt nevinovat si victima
unui grav abuz, “medic” cu care m-am consultat dupa ce interlopul Herghelegiu Danut, instigat de grupul
infractional local din Focsani, a savarsit in flagrant pe data de 05.12.2015 tentativa de Omor calificat si
Vatamarea corporala impotriva mea, grup infractional organizat care apoi la serviciul de urgenta a
Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon” Focsani a instigat sa fiu injectat in cotul mainii drepte fara acordul meu, cu o
substanta necunoscuta de o persoana necunoscuta care a crezut ca nu voi simti, iar dupa ce am deschis
dosare penale si civile interlopului Herghelegiu Danut, exact asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela instigatorul
interlopului si acestor abuzuri a sustras dosarele civile si le-a musamalizat falsificand hotararile, a
falsificat cauza 15730/231/2014 avand obiectul punerea sub interdictie pe care a si pierdut-o drept
dovada, si in scopul abuzarii mele pentru a renunta la dreptate sau a ma reduce la tacere prin vatamarea
mea fizica si psihica, a instigat pe asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul sa falsifice dosarul 2417/P/2014 care a
fost inventat aproape concomitent cu tentativa de Omor calificat si Vatamarea corporala din
05.12.2015 savarsita de interlopul Herghelegiu Danut, apoi asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul a falsificat
propunerea de internarea mea nevoluntara 11224/231/2015 anulata drept dovada si ulterior a falsificat
propunerea de obligarea mea la tratament medical 14277/231/2015 anulata drept dovada, constituind
evident tentativa si proba obsesiei criminale a grupului infractional local de a ma pune intr-o situatie de
vulnerabilitate pentru a ma vatama prin injectarea cu substante toxice, lovire sau in alte moduri.
In dovedirea inadmisibilitatii obligatii mele la tratament medical invoc principiul aplicarii unitare
a dreptului cf. art. 124 din Constitutia Romanie si ca jurisprudenta dosarul 907/307/2010 de la
Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei din care citez conform articolului de specialitate de la adresa:
http://www.juridice.ro/346691/romania-la-cedo-cauza-pendinte-ivascu-internarea-medicala-
nevoluntara-la-ordinul-procurorului-dreptul-la-viata-privata-si-raspunderea-statului.html

La 19 octombrie 2009, procuratura a solicitat instanței pronunțarea unui ordin de tratament psihiatric
obligatoriu. Într-o decizie finală din data de 1 septembrie 2010, Judecătoria Sighetu Marmației a respins
cererea procurorului. Instanța a considerat că, în temeiul articolului 111 din Codul penal (corespondent
art. 107 din noul Cod Penal, privind scopul masurilor de siguranta), măsurile de siguranță (cum ar fi
admiterea obligatorie într-o unitate medicală și un ordin de a urma un tratament psihiatric) au drept
scop să pună capăt unor situații periculoase și pentru a preveni fenomenul infracțional. De aceea, ele ar
trebui impuse doar persoanelor care au săvârșit infracțiuni prevăzute de dreptul penal. Prin urmare, un
ordin pentru a urma un tratament psihiatric nu poate fi impus reclamantului până când nu se va stabili
că acesta a comis o infracțiune, dar și că există pericolul de a comite alte infracțiuni pe viitor.
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 244 of 403


Prin hotararea judecatoreasca din dosarul 907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei
probez faptul moral pe care-l consider de notorietate, ca este ilegal a supune o persoana nevinovata la
tratament medical obligatoriu, sau o persoana care beneficiaza de prezumtia de nevinovatie in cazul
meu in calitate de nevinovat in dosarele 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016
precum si 12718/231/2017, precum atesta faptul ca ordonanta de renuntarea la urmarirea penala e
falsificata nu doar prin faptul ca e vadit nemotivata, ilegala, bazata pe acte juridice si judiciare falsificate,
ci ma acuza ca am savarsit o fapta penala fara sa probeze aceasta printr-o hotarare judecatoreasca
definitiva cf. art. 23 (11) din CR care probeaza vinovatia mea cf. art. 6 (2) din CEDO, in caz contrar avand
dreptul la prezumtia de nevinovatie, suspect insemnand ca nu exista probe impotriva mea si inculpat ca
sunt acuzat si exista presupuse probe impotriva mea, insa fiindca probele in numar de 0 (zero) sunt
aceleasi si atunci cand am avut calitatea de suspect, si de inculpat, iarasi este dovedita nevinovatia mea
precum si abuzul asa-ziselor organe judiciare de a ma chema sa dau aceeasi declaratie identica de 3 ori
privind acuzatii vadit falsificate impotriva mea conform marturiilor din dosar si conform probelor
materiale audio a inregistrarilor de sedinta din 18.05.2016 si 24.06.2016 cand am fost inscenat, motiv
pentru care am formulat plangere penala prealabila pentru Falsul in declaratii si Inducerea in eroare a
organelor judiciare impotriva asa-zisilor judecatori Paun Ionel Iulian si Popa Mariana, reclamagii
mincinosi din aceste dosare, precum am inculpat in aceleasi dosare si pe asa-zisele organe judiciare care
au falsificat aceste dosare impotriva mea, dupa modelul cazului de notorietate Berbeceanu care si-a
inculpat acuzatorii mincinosi in aceleasi dosare in care este acuzat, si-n care in cele din urma au fost
condamnati

B. invoc exceptia lipsei calitatii procesuale pasive pentru aceleasi motive pentru care am
invocat exceptia inadmisibilitatii
In dovedirea compatibilitatii motivarii in fapt a exceptiei lipsei calitatii procesuale pasive si a
exceptiei inadmisibilitatii invoc literatura de specialitate in drept de la adresa:
http://legeaz.net/dictionar-juridic/exceptia-lipsei-calitatii-procesuale
de unde citez:

De vreme ce calitatea procesuală este o condiţie de admisibilitate a acţiunii, s-a apreciat că nu este
greşită nici soluţia de respingere a cererii ca inadmisibilă, în urma admiterii acestei excepţii de fond.

C. invoc exceptia autoritatii de lucru judecat deoarece n-am fost judecat in 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016, insa am fost judecat pentru fapte fictive si acuzat de lipsa de disernamant
de mai multe ori in prealabil din 11224/231/2015 si 14277/231/2015, acest dosar din urma fiind identic
cu 12718/231/2017 adica bazat pe acuzatii de fapte fictive si documente vadit falsificate. Conform
principiului de drept ne ibis idem, nimeni nu poate fi judecat pentru acelasi lucru de doua ori chiar si sub
alta incadrare, si deoarece acuzatiile ca sunt lipsit de discernamant savarsind fapte imaginate de asa-
zisele organe judiciare, au fost judecate adica in fondul propunerii de internarea mea nevoluntara in
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 245 of 403

scopul efectuarii expertizei psihiatrice care a fost declarata nefondata prin hotararea judecatoreasca din
dosarul 11224/231/2015 in faza de contestatie la Tribunalul Vrancea, si acelasi fond invocat in
propunerea de obligarea mea la tratament medical a fost declarat inadmisibil in fond si nefondat la
contestatie in 14277/231/2015 la Judecatoria Focsani si Tribunalul Vrancea, sub prezumtia ca as fi fost
judecat si gasit vinovat tot se aplica exceptia autoritatii de lucru judecat ce atrage inadmisibilitatea
actiunii 12718/231/2017 precum ar fi atras si inadmisibilitatea sesizarii instantei prin rechizitoriu
deoarece am mai fost judecat pentru fapte fictive in trecut si acuzat de lipsa de discernamant in mod
mincinos
In dovedirea admisibilitatii exceptiei autoritatii de lucru judecat, citez literatura de specialitate
in drept de la adresa: http://legeaz.net/dictionar-juridic/autoritate-lucru-judeact-hotarari-penale

în vederea invocării autorităţii de lucru judecat se cer întrunite cumulativ următoarele condiţii:
a) existenţa unei hotărâri penale definitive; b) o nouă acţiune penală îndreptată împotriva aceleiaşi
persoane (eadem personae) c) să fie vorba de acelaşi fapt material (idem factumf.

a) Autoritatea de lucru judecat derivă din puterea pe care o au exclusiv hotărârile judecătoreşti
definitive, celelalte acte procesuale ale organelor judiciare penale neavând această autoritate.
...

b) Cea de-a doua condiţie presupune să se fi declanşat un proces penal împoriva aceleiaşi persoane. în
alţi termeni, aceeaşi persoană trebuie să aibă calitatea procesuală de învinuit sau inculpat.
Lipsa de identitate între celelalte părţi din cauză nu are relevanţă sub aspectul autorităţii de lucru
judecat.
...
c) Cea de-a treia condiţie ce se cere pentru a exista autoritatea de lucru judecat vizează existenţa
aceluiaşi fapt material).
în practica judiciară din perioada interbelică s-a decis că în materie penală există lucru judecat nu numai
pentru faptul cum el a fost calificat, ci pentru faptul material însuşi, astfel cum a avut loc, aşa că faptul
nu mai poate face obiectul unei a doua urmăriri, sub o nouă calificare şi indiferent de soluţia pronunţată,
ceea ce este confirmat, în prezent, prin art. 10 lit. j din Codul de procedură penală.
...
în penal, identitatea de cauză este înlăturată prin însăşi precizarea din art. 10 lit. j din Codul de
procedură penală, potrivit căreia autoritatea de lucru judecat îşi produce efectele chiar dacă faptei
definitiv judecate i s-ar da o altă încadrare juridică.

* art. 10 j) din vechiul CPP corespunde art. 16 i) din noul CPP
Faptele definitiv judecate sunt acuzatiile vadit fictive din 2417/P/2014, prin care mi-am
demonstrat nevinovatia si faptul ca asa-zisele organe judiciare vrancene sunt de fapt infractorii.
Deoarece acuzatiile de fapte imaginate de asa-zisele organe judiciare vrancene sunt identice, cum ca
sunt lipsit de discernamant, evident este aplicabil principiul ne bis idem intre toate dosarele
11224/231/2015, 14277/231/2015, 4909/231/2017 si 12718/231/2017, in care sunt acuzat de acelasi
lucru bazat in mod identic pe documente falsificate in 12718/231/2017 ca si-n 14277/231/2015
Daca prin absurd nu sunt admise exceptiile inadmisibilitatii si a lipsei calitatii procesuale pasive,
automat se retine ca am calitatea de inculpat in mod nelegal si netemeinic cf. art. 4 si art. 99 din CPP,
art. 23 (11) din CR, art. 11, 20 din CR si art. 11 din Declaratia universala a drepturilor omului si art. 6 (2)
din CEDO, ceea ce atrage admiterea oricum a exceptiei autoritatii de lucru judecat a fondului propunerii
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 246 of 403

de obligarea la tratament medical prin care sunt acuzat ca n-am discernamant si despre care am
demonstrat ca sunt judecat pentru a 4-a oara dupa ce am demonstrat ca am discernamant si “organele
judiciare” si “medicii psihiatri” n-au, dar repet in virtutea viciului de procedura si folosind aceasta
exprimare contradictorie intentionat pentru a sublinia realitatea de fapt, beneficiez de prezumtia de
nevinovatie pana la dovedirea infractiunii cf. art. 6 (2) din CEDO, mai precis in mod echitabil adica legal
cf. art. 6 (1) din CEDO

In continuare descriu pe scurt motivele in fapt si de drept pe scurt, pe care le explicitez la


sectiunea I. In fapt pe larg, privind faptul ca propunerea de obligarea mea la tratament medical este
inadmisibila deoarece:
1. nu am calitate procesuala pasiva in dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 din
care a fost intentata propunerea de obligarea mea la tratament medical inregistrata in dosarul
12718/231/2017 precum n-am avut calitate procesuala pasiva in 2417/P/2014 si propunerea de
obligarea me ala tratament medical provizoriu 14277/231/2015 anulata prin urmare ca inadmisibila si
nefondata, datorita ordonantei de renuntarea la urmarirea penala falsificata din 01.08.2017 din
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016. Nefiind urmarit penal nu am calitatea de inculpat, si fiindca
nu a fost evident intocmit rechizitoriul si trimis dosarul in judecata, si n-am fost condamnat printr-o
hotarare definitiva, nu am nici calitatea de condamnat pentru care oricum este obligatorie respectarea
garantiilor mele procesuale si demonstrarea vinovatiei mele ceea ce este imposibil deoarece toate
probele imi demonstreaza nevinovatia motiv pentru care “organele judiciare” nici n-au consemnat,
administrat si obictivat probatoriul nici macar pentru acuzare. Fiinda procurorul nu are capacitatea
juridica de a condamna, beneficiez conform legii de prezumtia de nevinovatie motiv pentru care nu pot
fi acuzat sau inculpat si cu atat mai putin pedepsit deoarece nu exista condamnare, si nici nu se poate
emite un diagnostic care este analogic o “condamnare” medicala deoarece nu exista efecte fara cauze
adica consecinte fara fapte, ceea ce de la sine demonstreaza ca toate actele medicale impotriva mea
sunt falsificate cu rea-credinta criminala
2. nu sunt condamnat, aceasta conditie fiind obligatorie pentru obligarea mea la tratament
medical, de drept cf. art. 107 din CP, si conform jurisprudentei hotararii din dosarul 907/307/2010 de la
Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei, si conform principiului aplicarii unitare a dreptului cf. art. 124 din
Constitutia Romaniei
3. nu sunt realizate conditiile legale ale art. 566-572 din CPP si art. 109 (1) din CP, raportate la
art. 107-108 din CP, deoarece obligarea la tratament medical se dispune doar fata de condamnati,
singurii fata de care prezumtia de nevinovatie nu mai functioneaza cu conditia sa li se fi respectat
garantiile procesuale si dovedit vinovatia silogistic adica in conformitate cu logica juridica, motivat in
fapt si de drept cf. art. 403 (1) c)d) din CPP. Fiindca calitatea mea procesuala in dosarele penale
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 a incetat prin clasarea dosarelor prin ordonanta de
renuntarea la urmarirea penala falsificata din 01.08.2017 din 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si
4329/P/2016, si fiindca nu am fost condamnat, beneficiez de prezumtia de nevinovatie adica faptele nu
exista deoarece sunt nevionvat si singurul acuzat pe nedrept si prin urmare nu se poate sa fi savarsit o
fapta penala conform principiului non-contradictiei, deci propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 247 of 403

nu poate fi legala si temeinica si nici asa-zisele acte medicale care sunt nelegale si netemeinice oricum
din alte motive infatisate in prezenta concomitent
4. referatul cu propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical este falsificat in motivarea in fapt
si de drept, fiind obligatorie motivarea in fapt si de drept a actelor organului de urmarire penala in
conditiile legii, adica motivarea trebuie intocmita conform logicii juridice printr-un silogism sau inferenta
bazata pe premiza universala a legii corelata relevant cu premiza particulara factuala adica a realitatii de
fapt a dosarului sau pe scurt sa reprezinte adevarul sau realitatea nu s-o falsifice, de drept cf. art. 5, art.
286 d) si art. 306 din CPP, motiv pentru care aceasta ordonanta este nula de drept cf. art. 280 si art. 282
(1) din CPP. Toti cetatenii cf. art. 1 din CR si in particular orice functionar public cum ar fi judecatorii cf.
art. 124 din CR se supun numai legii nu ordinelor ilicite ale “procurorilor”
5. raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232 din presupusa data de
17.09.2015, raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica din 06.04.2017, raportul de expertiza
medico-legala psihiatrica 1447/A1-P/333/09.12.2016(!? - n-am vazut nici un psihiatru sau medic legist
de orice fel in persoana la aceasta data sau dealtfel in prealabil in contextul dosarelor 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 deci acestia au sustinut interviul psihiatric evident in imaginatia lor), fisa de
externare din 08.06.2017 a Sectiei de psihiatrie a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon”, certificatul medico-legal
psihiatric din 08.06.2017 si alte asa-zise acte medicale, toate necomunicate oficial adica ilegal cu
impropriile exceptii 970/A1-P/232 pe care l-am gasit ascuns la arhiva in 2015 si a fisei de externare
absolut lipsita de motivarea in fapt, sunt vadit falsificate in fapt si de drept, intocmit cu incalcarea art.
184(1)(3,4) din CPP, art. 10,11,17 din Legea 487/2002, art. 3 din Norme metodologice privind activitatea
medicului legist in calitate de expert numit de organele judiciare la solicitarea partilor precum si alte
incalcari ale regulementelor medico-legale si codului deontologic profesional.

Deasemenea va atrag atentia asupra faptului ca in eventualitatea ca ati emite o hotarare


judecatoreasca nelegala si netemeinica la ordinele si in interesul ilicit al grupului infractional ce
urmareste prin aceasta actiune sa ma Vateme corporal respectiv pana la savarsirea infractiunii de
Omorul calificat prin otravirea pe termen lung cu neurotoxine pe baza de clor si fluor, imi primejduiti
grav viata sau integritatea fizica si psihica, precum demonstrez aceasta obsesie criminala demonstrata
pe termen lung prin
inscrisurile din 15730/231/2014 avand obiectul punerea mea sub interdictie, dosar pierdut de
“judecatorul” instigator Dita Mirela la Vatamarea mea corporala si Omorul calificat,
inscrisurile din 10547/231/2015 avand obiectul detinerea mea in mod nelegal si netemeinic la
psihiatrie,
inscrisurile din dosarul 11224/231/2015 avand obiectul internarea mea nevoluntara, dosar
pierdut la contestatie de “procurorii” instigati de Dita Mirela la Vatamarea mea corporala si Omorul
calificat, adica Mihaila Paul si Tarlea Florin Cristinel in principal, cu mentiunea ca Dita Mirela este
reclamantul mincinos din 2417/P/2014,
inscrisurile din dosarul 14277/231/2015 avand obiectul obligarea mea la tratament medical
provizoriu, dosar pierdut la fond si contestatie de “procurorii” instigati de Dita Mirela la Vatamarea mea
corporala si Omorul calificat, adica adica Mihaila Paul, Tarlea Florin Cristinel, Dogaru, Dragovici, Batranu
si Barsan in principal cu mentiunea ca Dita Mirela este reclamantul mincinos din 2417/P/2014
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 248 of 403

inscrisurile din 4971/231/2017 avand obiectul detinerea mea in mod nelegal si netemeinic la
psihiatrie, identic falsificat de acelasi asa-zis judecator Dinu Murgulet Ana ca si 10547/231/2017, dupa
care acelasi asa-zis judecator Dinu Murgulet Ana a sustras si falsificat
inscrisurile din dosarul 4909/231/2017 avand obiectul internarea mea nevoluntara, dosar
identic cu 11224/231/2015 pierdut de “procurorii” instigati de Dita Mirela la Vatamarea mea corporala
si Omorul calificat, cu mentiunea ca Dita Mirela este reclamantul mincinos din 2417/P/2014 si
15730/231/2014 deci si instigatorul din dosarele identic falsificate 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016,
4329/P/2016, 4791/231/2017, 4791/231/2017 (-10547/231/2015), 4909/231/2017 (-11224/231/2015)
si 12718/231/2017 (-14277/231/2015)

In consecinta invoc nulitatea relativa a:


1. tuturor actelor medicale din dosarele relevante cauzei pe rol, si
2. referatului cu propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical,
cf. art. 280 si art. 282 din CPP,
fiindca sunt nelegale, netemeinice si falsificate cu rea-credinta criminala, precum le-am declarat
pe propria raspundere in prezenta fara sa fiu acuzat de Falsul in declaratii si Inducerea in eroare a
organelor judiciare ca si pana acum, fapt prin care fac proba veritatii declaratiilor mele care nu pot fi
inlaturate ci care inlatura orice dubiu astfel privind nevinovatia mea,
precum demonstrez in continuare pe scurt si in detaliu la sectiunea I
In dovedire, invoc legea care statueaza ca toate actele emise cu nerespectarea Codului de
procedura penala sunt lovite de nulitate conform

Cod de procedura penala


Art. 280 - Efectele nulitatii
(1) Incalcarea dispozitiilor legale care reglementeaza desfasurarea procesului penal atrage nulitatea
actului in conditiile prevazute expres de prezentul cod.

Cod de procedura penala


Art. 282 - Nulitatile relative
(1) Incalcarea oricaror dispozitii legale in afara celor prevazute la art. 281 determina nulitatea actului
atunci cand prin nerespectarea cerintei legale s-a adus o vatamare drepturilor partilor ori ale subiectilor
procesuali principali, care nu poate fi inlaturata altfel decat prin desfiintarea actului

Art. 17 din Legea 487/2002 republicata 2012, legea sanatatii mintale si a protectiei persoanelor cu
tulburari psihice
Evaluarea sanatatii mintale in cadrul expertizei medico-legale psihiatrice se face in conformitate cu
prevederile legale in vigoare.

In fapt, asa-zisele acte medicale din dosarele relevante cauzei sunt falsificate in flagrant precum
l-am denuntat, deoarece expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica nu a avut loc insa ele sunt mentionate in
ordonanta falsificata de renuntarea la urmarirea penala si alte indicii ca exista, inclusiv ar trebui sa existe
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 249 of 403

pentru validitatea actiunii de obligarea mea la tratament medical ceea ce s-ar putea prezuma daca mi-ar
fi fost comunicate insa fiindca nu mi s-au comunicat, mi s-a incalcat in flagrant dreptul la aparare cf. art.
3 din CEDO in particular conform principiului contradictorialitatii adica trebuind a fi informat cu privire la
toate acuzele ce mi se aduc si asa-zisele probe pe care se intemeiaza pentru ca sa am posibilitatea de a
ma opune acestora respectiv de a-i acuza pe autori de falsuri, si acesta e exact motivul pentru care nu mi
s-au comunicat aceste inscrisuri ceea ce este irelevant fiindca atunci probele ce nu mi s-au comunicat si
care oricum le-am demonstrat falsificate in temeiul legii adica asa-zisele acte medicale, nu pot fi luate in
considerare din cauza nerespectarii garantiilor procesuale, dreptul la aparare fiind garantat inclusiv de
Constitutia Romaniei cf. art. 24 din CR ori conform doctrinei administrarii probelor, ascunderea probelor
demonstreaza dolul celui care le ascunde si prin urmare aceasta stare de fapt probeaza nevinovatia
mea, proba admisibila cf. art. 97 din CPP. Fiind anulata propunerea de internarea mea nevoluntara in
scopul efectuarii expertizei medico-legale psihiatrice in dosarul 11224/231/2015 in faza de contestatie la
Tribunalul Vrancea mentionez ca mi-am demonstrat atunci conform principiului non-contradictiei
sanatatae mintala deoarece daca ia un asemenea efort concentrat in incercarea de a ma scoate alienat
mintal, inseamna ca sunt mai mult decat normal si sanatos, avand si abilitatea gratie lui Dumnezeu de a
combate atat amar de dusmani si de a-mi demonstra nevinovatia. Precum am demonstrat repetat dar
relevant, orice raport de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica emis in privinta mea nu poate fi decat
falsificat in flagrant in drept, incalcandu-se art. 183(1)(3, 4) din CPP, art. 10, 11, 17 din Legea 487/2002,
adica datorita faptului ca nu pot fi expertizat medico-legal psihiatric decat cu consimtamantul meu pe
care nu-l dau stiind ca sarlatanii de psihiatri si instigatorii lor “organele judiciare” infractoare au nevoie
de aceasta conditie ca sa falsifice aspectul legal al abuzurilor criminale impotriva mea de Vatamare
corporala si Omorul calificat, precum reamintesc ca ar fi trebuit sa fiu inculpat sau condamnat pentru
infractiunile de omorul sau pruncuciderea pentru a se pune macar problema evaluarii mele psihiatrice
de catre procuror, inainte de conditia obligatorie a consimtamantul meu liber dat in scris, dar si
documentat si informat in prezenta unui reprezentant legal sau conventional care chiar daca as fi fost
acuzat de omorul sau pruncuciderea si nu de Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei si in particular de aberatia
tulburarii linistii prin ascultarea de carti audio la casti demonstrand ca “organele judiciare” efectiv n-au
de ce sa ma acuze motiv pentru care au venit cu asemenea prostie, lipsa consimtamantului meu iarasi
impiedica expertizarea mea psihiatrica tocmai fiindca dreptul la integritate fizica si psihica este garantat
chiar si ucigasilor fiindca noi, cetatenii normali integrati social statului de drept nu suntem ca ei - ordinea
de drept nu este legea talionului nici razbunare ci armonie si pace
In dovedire invoc legea:

Codul de procedura penala


Art. 184 - Expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica
(1) In cazul infractiunilor comise de minorii cu varsta intre 14 si 16 ani, in cazul uciderii sau vatamarii
copilului nou-nascut ori a fatului de catre mama, precum SI (nu “sau”) atunci cand organul de urmarire
penala sau instanta are o indoiala asupra discernamantului suspectului ori inculpatului in momentul
savarsirii infractiunii ce face obiectul acuzatiei, se dispune efectuarea unei expertize medico-legale
psihiatrice, stabilindu-se totodata termenul de prezentare in vederea examinarii.
(3) Expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica se efectueaza dupa obtinerea consimtamantului scris al
persoanei ce urmeaza a fi supusa expertizei, exprimat, in prezenta unui avocat ales sau din oficiu, in fata
organului judiciar, iar in cazul minorului, si in prezenta ocrotitorului legal.
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 250 of 403

Art. 10 din Legea 487/2002 legea sanatatii mintale si a protectiei persoanelor cu tulburari psihice
(1) Evaluarea sanatatii mintale se efectueaza, prin examinare directa a persoanei in cauza, numai de
catre medicul psihiatru.
(2) Evaluarea se va realiza in institutii de sanatate mintala, autorizate si acreditate conform legii.

In fapt, conform literaturii de specialitate anexate la dosarul 11224/231/2015, Serviciile de


medicina legala nu sunt autorizate sa emita rapoarte de expertiza medico-legale in cauze penale.
Aceasta mi-a fost confirmat si de avocatii cu care am stat de vorba in rastimpul in care am fost Privat
ilegal de libertate intre orele 9:30 A.M. si 11:00 A.M., in incinta Judecatoriei Focsani

Art. 11 din Legea 487/2002 legea sanatatii mintale si a protectiei persoanelor cu tulburari psihice
Evaluarea sanatatii mintale se face cu consimtamantul liber, informat si documentat al persoanei, cu
exceptia situatiilor specifice, stabilite de lege, cand persoana evaluata are dificultati in a aprecia
implicatiile unei decizii asupra ei insesi, situatii in care persoana evaluata trebuie sa beneficieze de
asistenta reprezentantului legal sau conventional.

Art. 13 din Legea 487/2002 legea sanatatii mintale si a protectiei persoanelor cu tulburari psihice
(1) Obiectivul evaluarii este stabilirea diagnosticului.

In concluzie, expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica (“Prima EMLP” conform literaturii de


specialitate medico-legala anexate) nu putea fi indeplinita legal deoarece:
- cf. art. 184 (1) din CPP, nu sunt suspect pentru omor sau pruncucidere, SI (nu “sau”)
propunerea procurorului este nelegala, netemeinica adica mincinoasa si neprobata pe deasupra,
precum si de rea-credinta criminala
- cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP si art. 10 din Legea 487/2002, nu mi-am dat consimtamantul pentru a-
mi fi pusa la indoiala sanatatea mintala si in consecinta evaluata in contradictoriu cu evidenta faptului ca
sunt sanatos mintal, conform certificatelor eliberate repetat de medicina muncii sau armata
- lipseste avizul Comisiei superioare de medicina legala, conform literaturii de specialitate
medico-legala acesta fiind obligatoriu
- lipseste motivarea ordonantei procurorului in fapt si de drept in conditiile legii neputand
constitui o motivare in fapt in conditiile legii infractiunile de falsurile in inscrisuri prin care asa-zisul
procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian a falsificat motivarea propunerii de obligarea la tratament medical, pentru
ca nu reprezinta adevarul. Procurorul este obligat a motiva in fapt si de drept ordonanta cf. art. 5, art.
286 d) din CPP, art. 306 din CPP. Aceasta constituie abatere disciplinara grava cf. art. 9 a)e)f)n)r)s)t) si
art. 99^1 (1) din Legea 303/2004 privind statutul magistratilor.

In fapt referatul cu propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical este falsificat deoarece:


1. nu am calitate procesuala pasiva in dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 din
care a fost intentata propunerea de obligarea mea la tratament medical inregistrata in dosarul
12718/231/2017, datorita ordonantei de renuntarea la urmarirea penala falsificata din 01.08.2017 din
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016. Nefiind urmarit penal nu am calitatea de inculpat, si fiindca
nu a fost evident intocmit rechizitoriul si trimis dosarul in judecata, si n-am fost condamnat printr-o
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 251 of 403

hotarare definitiva, nu am calitatea de condamnat nu ca as fi putut fi condamnat prin incalcarea


garantiilor mele procesuale si fara dovedirea vinovatiei mele ceea ce este imposibil conform principiului
non-contradictiei in baza probelor din dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 care-mi
demonstreaza nevinovatia la fel ca-n propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical provizoriu
14277/231/2015 anulata prin urmare ca inadmisibila si nefondata, nu pot fi din aceleasi motive obligat
legal si temeinic la obligarea la tratament medical provizoriu 12718/231/2017. Pentru condamnarea
mea este obligatorie respectarea garantiilor mele procesuale si demonstrarea vinovatiei mele ceea ce
este imposibil deoarece toate probele imi demonstreaza nevinovatia motiv pentru care “organele
judiciare” nici n-au consemnat, administrat si obictivat probatoriul nici macar pentru acuzare. Fiinda
procurorul nu are capacitatea juridica de a condamna, beneficiez conform legii de prezumtia de
nevinovatie motiv pentru care nu pot fi acuzat sau inculpat si cu atat mai putin pedepsit deoarece nu
exista condamnare, si nici nu se poate emite un diagnostic care este analogic o “condamnare” medicala
deoarece nu exista efecte fara cauze adica consecinte fara fapte, ceea ce de la sine demonstreaza ca
toate actele medicale impotriva mea sunt falsificate cu rea-credinta criminala
2. nu sunt condamnat, aceasta conditie fiind obligatorie pentru obligarea mea la tratament
medical, de drept cf. art. 107 din CP, si conform jurisprudentei hotararii din dosarul 907/307/2010 de la
Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei, si conform principiului aplicarii unitare a dreptului cf. art. 124 din
Constitutia Romaniei
3. nu sunt realizate conditiile legale ale art. 566-572 din CPP si art. 109 (1) din CP, raportate la
art. 107-108 din CP, deoarece obligarea la tratament medical se dispune doar fata de condamnati,
singurii fata de care prezumtia de nevinovatie nu mai functioneaza cu conditia sa li se fi respectat
garantiile procesuale si dovedit vinovatia silogistic adica in conformitate cu logica juridica, motivat in
fapt si de drept cf. art. 403 (1) c)d) din CPP. Fiindca calitatea mea procesuala in dosarele penale
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 a incetat prin clasarea dosarelor prin ordonanta de
renuntarea la urmarirea penala falsificata din 01.08.2017 din 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si
4329/P/2016, si fiindca nu am fost condamnat, beneficiez de prezumtia de nevionvatie, fapta nu exista
deoarece sunt nevionvat si prin urmare nu se poate sa fi savarsit o fapta penala conform principiului
non-contradictiei, deci propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical nu poate fi legala si temeinica si
nici asa-zisele acte medicale care sunt nelegale si netemeinice oricum din alte motive infatisate in
prezenta concomitent
4. referatul cu propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical provizoriu este falsificat in
motivarea in fapt si de drept, fiind obligatorie motivarea in fapt si de drept a actelor organului de
urmarire penala in conditiile legii, adica motivarea sa reprezinte adevarul sau realitatea nu s-o falsifice,
de drept cf. art. 5, art. 286 d) si art. 306 din CPP, aceasta este nula de drept cf. art. 280 si art. 282 (1) din
CPP

precum descriu detaliat in continuare:

I. In fapt,
descriu situatia de fapt si de drept organizat pe sectiuni astfel:
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 252 of 403

1. Pagina 28 - Privind inadmisibilitatea obligarii la tratament medical deoarece nu am calitate


procesuala pasiva in dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 implicit in dosarul
12718/231/2017, datorita ordonantei de renuntarea la urmarirea penala falsificata din 01.08.2017 din
2845/231/2017
2. Pagina 29 - Privind inadmisibilitatea obligarii la tratament medical deoarece nu sunt
condamnat, cf. art. 107 din CP, si conform jurisprudentei hotararii din dosarul 907/307/2010 de la
Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei
3. Pagina 33 - Privind inadmisibilitatea obligarii la tratament medical deoarece nu sunt
realizate conditiile legale ale art. 566-572 din CPP si art. 109 (1) din CP
4. Pagina 42 - Privind inadmisibilitatea obligarii la tratament medical deoarece referatul cu
propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical este falsificat in motivarea in fapt si de drept, fiind
obligatorie motivarea in fapt si de drept a actelor organului de urmarire penala in conditiile legii, adica
motivarea sa reprezinte adevarul sau realitatea nu s-o falsifice, de drept cf. art. 5, art. 286 d) si art.
306 din CPP
5. Pagina 47 - Privind inadmisibilitatea obligarii la tratament medical deoarece toate actele
“medicale”, “medico-legale” si altele sunt vadit falsificate in fapt si de drept, fiind ascunse de mine
prin necomunicare special pentru a mi se ingradi dreptul la aparare cf. art. 6 (3) din CEDO

si descriu detaliat motivele pentru prin care va rog sa constatati:


1. toate actele “medicale”, “medico-legale” si altele, si
2. referatul cu propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical,
nule de drept cf. art. 280 si art. 282 din CPP motiv pentru care invoc nulitatea relativa a acestor
acte,
fiindca sunt nelegale, netemeinice si falsificate cu rea-credinta criminala, precum le-am declarat
pe propria raspundere in prezenta fara sa fiu acuzat de Falsul in declaratii sau Inducerea in eroare a
organelor judiciare, fapt prin care fac proba veritatii absolute a declaratiilor mele si prin urmare a
nevinovatiei mele, precum demonstrez in continuare pe scurt si in detaliu la sectiunea I,
si sa constatati actiunea inregistrata in dosarul 12718/231/2017:
1. inadmisibila deoarece este nelegal ntrodusa,
2. netemeinica deoarece este introdusa in baza unor inscrisuri vadit falsificate,
3. neconstitutionala deoarece mi s-a incalcat in flagrant prezumtia de nevinovatie, pentru care
am formulat doua cereri de sesizare a Curtii Constitutionale in care am invocat exceptia de
neconstitutionalitate a art. 315 (2) e) din CPP, respectiv a art. 566-573 din CPP
4. de rea-credinta criminala deoarece autorii inscrisurilor vadit falsificate urmaresc evident
punerea mea intr-o situatie de vulnerabilitate pentru Vatamarea mea corporala grava si pentru a savarsi
in timp Omorul calificat, aceasta actiune demonstrand adevarata intentie mascata in actiunea de
internarea mea nevoluntara constatata nefondata in prealabil in dosarul 11224/231/2015 in faza de
contestatie la Tribunalul Vrancea, si in actiunea 14277/231/2015 avand obiectul obligarea mea la
tratament medical provizoriu pe care grupul infractional organizat a pierdut-o ca inadmisibila si
nefondata, precum si actiunea 15730/231/2014 demonstreaza in particular ca instigatorul original este
“judecatorul” Dita Mirela dupa ce a instigat pe interlopul Herghelegiu Danut sa ma omoare pe
27.10.2014 si 05.12.2014 cand m-a lovit in cap si aruncat pe treptele scarii blocului ca sa faca sa para un
accident, iar “judecatorul” Dita Mirela precum i-a promis i-a sustras dosarele civile si le-a musamalizat
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 253 of 403

falsificand hotararile si si-a instigat grupul infractional organizat sa-i musamalizeze dosarul penal,
respectiv sa falsifice dosarele penale si cu profil psihiatric enumerate in prezenta pentru a ma impiedica
sa trag la raspundere penala si civila acest grup infractional organizat, si sa-i denunt public motiv pentru
care acest an au cenzurat forumul militia.freeforums.net si au incercat sa-mi cenzureze contul de
facebook simultan cu arestarile ilegale din 06, 10, 13 si 14 Aprilie 2017, sperand sa ma reduca la tacere
fara a avea posibilitatea de a le publica abuzurile criminale,
precum demonstrez in continuare:

1. Privind inadmisibilitatea obligarii la tratament medical deoarece nu am calitate procesuala


pasiva in dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 implicit in dosarul 12718/231/2017,
datorita ordonantei de renuntarea la urmarirea penala falsificata din 01.08.2017 din 2845/231/2017
Deoarece asa-zisul procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian a avut un episod maniacal crezandu-se
judecator m-a condamnat pentru o infractiune care n-am savarsit-o prin ordonanta de renuntarea la
urmarirea penala nelegala si netemeinica din 01.08.2017 din dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si
4329/P/2016 in care a mintit vadit ca am savarsit infractiunea de Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei
deoarece probele marturii si probe materiale audio a inregistrarilor de sedinta imi demonstreaza
nevinovatia, precum si faptul ca asa-zisul procuror a refuzat sa consemneze si sa administreze
probatoriul inclusiv pentru acuzare deoarece-i este imposibil sa foloseasca probe ce-mi demonstreaza
nevinovatia pentru a-mi demonstra vinovatia, iarasi imi demonstraza nevinovatia, precum si lipsa
premizelor din propozitiile categorice si silogismul motivarii ordonantei imi demonstreaza nevinovatia si
faptul ca ordonanta este falsificata adica deopotriva ilegala continand numeroase si vadita incalcari ale
legii, netemeinica datorita invaliditatii sau lipsei motivarii in fapt si de drept, si de rea-credinta criminala
facand referire la alte acte juridice vadit falsificate de niste asa-zisi psihiatri si medici legisti,
constat ca nu am nici macar la modul tehnic calitatea de inculpat in dosarele 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 deoarece sunt nevinovat pentru multitudinea de motive in fapt si de drept
invocate mai sus, adica in mod nelegal si netemeinic am fost acuzat si urmarit penal peste 12 luni in
scopul de a fi santajat apoi vatamat corporal pentru a fi redus la tacere cu privire la denunturile mele in
legatura cu activitatea criminala a acelorasi asa-zise organe judiciare care m-au acuzat si urmarit
netemeinic, implicit in dosarul 12718/231/2017 nu am calitatatea de inculpat, si evident nici calitatea
intimat, infractor sau recidivist sau orice alta calitate decat cea de nevinovat, motiv pentru care solicit sa
mi va adresati cu calitatea de nevinovat, precum solicit ca aceasta calitate sa fie consemnata in
evidenta informatizata care apare pe saitul Judecatoriei Focsani, pentru a se cunoaste public ca in
calitate de nevinovat grupul infractional din Focsani urmareste vatamarea sau uciderea mea sub
pretextul obligarii la tratament medical, ceea ce din punctul meu de vedere este nemaiauzit.
Asa-zisul procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian mi-a incalcat in flagrant dreptul fundamental al
prezumtiei de nevinovatie stabilit prin art. 4 si art. 99 din CPP, 23 (11) din CR si tratatele ratificate de
Romania adica cf. art. 6 (2) din CEDO si art. 11 din Declaratia Universala a Drepturilor Omului, mintind
ca am savarsit infractiunea de Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei prin care se subintelege ca am fost
condamnat printr-o hotarare definitiva, precum a si instigat pe asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici Silviu si
alti coautori care au falsificat mai multe rapoarte de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica, mintind ca n-am
discernamant, ca sunt violent, ca am istoric judiciar prin care se subintelege ca am cazier penal s.a.m.d.
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 254 of 403

In dovedirea incalcarii prezumtiei de nevinovatie pe langa demonstratia in fapt sau premiza


particulara a silogismului acestei intampinari invoc legea sau premiza universala:

art. 11 din Declaratia Universala a Drepturilor Omului


Orice persoana acuzata de comiterea unui act cu caracter penal are dreptul sa fie presupusa
nevinovata pina cind vinovatia sa va fi stabilita in mod legal in cursul unui proces public in care i-au fost
asigurate toate garantiile necesare apararii sale.

art. 6 (2) din Conventia Europeana a Drepturilor Omului


Orice persoană acuzată de o infracţiune este prezumată nevinovată pînă ce vinovăţia sa va fi
legal stabilită

art. 23 (11) din Constitutia Romaniei


Până la rămânerea definitivă a hotărârii judecătoreşti de condamnare, persoana este
considerată nevinovată.

Codul de procedura penala


art. 4
Orice persoană este considerată nevinovată până la stabilirea vinovăţiei sale printr-o hotărâre
penală definitivă.

art. 99
Suspectul sau inculpatul beneficiază de prezumţia de nevinovăţie, nefiind obligat să îşi
dovedească nevinovăţia, şi are dreptul de a nu contribui la propria acuzare.

Nu in ultimul rand, evident infaptuirea justitiei este prerogativa exclusiva a judecatorului,


neputand fi condamnat de un procuror.
In dovedire invoc legea

Art. 2 din Legea 304/2004 privind organizarea judiciara


(2) Justiţia se realizează prin următoarele instanţe judecătoreşti:
a) Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie;
b) curţi de apel;
c) tribunale;
d) tribunale specializate;
e) instanţe militare;
f) judecătorii.

Art. 1. din Legea 303/2004 privind statutul magistratilor


Magistratura este activitatea judiciară desfăşurată d e judecători în scopul înfăptuirii justiţiei şi de
procurori în scopul apărării intereselor generale ale societăţii, a ordinii de drept, precum şi a drepturilor
şi libertăţilor cetăţenilor.

Este evident faptul ca am fost urmarit penal in dosarele inventate 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si
4329/P/2016 pentru ca asa-zisele organele judiciare sa savarseasca abuzuri impotriva mea, deoarece
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 255 of 403

fapta nu exista si atunci evident probele impotriva mea nu exista, coroborat cu faptul ca toate probele
din dosar imi demonstreaza nevinovatia si conform principiului non-contradictiei nu-mi pot dovedi
vinovatia in acelasi timp si sub acelasi raport

2. Privind inadmisibilitatea obligarii la tratament medical deoarece nu sunt condamnat, cf. art.
107 din CP, si conform jurisprudentei hotararii din dosarul 907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu
Marmatiei
O persoana nevinovata nu poate fi obligata la tratament medical psihiatric deoarece scopul
tratamentului medical este prevenirea infractionalitatii nu a spiritului civic si a comportamentului
civilizat, asa cum au intentionat infractorii Lupu Mihai Cristian si Lucasievici Silviu prin intentarea
dosarului 12718/231/2017.
Conform hotararii din dosarul 907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei constituind
jurisprudenta in temeiul principiului aplicarii unitare a dreptului cf. art. 124 din Constitutia Romaniei, un
om nevinovat nu poate fi obligat la tratament psihiatric, ceea ce e evident pentru toata lumea sanatoasa
mintal, cu mentiunea ca tratamentul medical pshiatric este o sarlatanie precum voi demonstra in
prezenta citand din literatura de specialitate psihiatrica si facand referire la proba materiala audio-video,
un documentar public intitulat “Comercializarea nebuniei” prezentand marturiile mai multor psihologi,
pacienti si demonstratia stiintifica a faptului ca psihiatria este o sarlatanie, la care fac referire prin
adresa acestui documentar de pe internet prin proba 2, urmand a-l anexa la dosar la cererea instantei pe
un DVD, si solicitand aducerea dosarului 14277/231/2015 pentru utilizarea acestei probe si constatarea
ne bis idem privind acuzatii de fapte fictive impotriva mea deasemenea, si acuzatia vadit si demonstrat
netemeinica prin 15730/231/2014, 11224/231/2015 si 14277/231/2015 ca n-as avea discernamant.
Precizez ca am avut calitatea de inculpat in dosarul 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 avand
obiectul Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei pana la data de 01.08.2017 cand asa-zisul procuror Lupu Mihai
Cristian a falsificat ordonanta de renuntarea la urmarirea penala mintind vadit ca am savarsit
infractiunea de Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei contrazicandu-se cu dovezile din dosar marturii, probe
materiale inregistrarile sedintelor de judecata din 18.05.2016 si 24.06.2016, declaratii pe propria
raspundere s.a.m.d., privind fapte fictive pentru care drept dovada nu am fost condamnat, si in mod
nelegal si netemeinic dar si nerezonabil ca durata am fost urmarit penal peste 12 luni fara sa fie intocmit
rechizitoriul si trimis dosarul in judecata desi probele sunt aceleasi deci evident nu avea nici un rost
chemarea mea sa dau aceiasi declaratie de 3 ori respectiv nici ordonanta falsificata de continuarea
urmaririi penale datorita ordonantei falsificata de punerea in miscare a actiunii penale constituind
infractiunea flagranta de Represiunea nedreapta savarsita de “procurorul” Lupu Mihai Cristian, fiindca
evident este imposibila declaratia ca nu exista probe suficiente ca sa fiu suspect, concomitent cu exista
aceleasi probe suficiente sa fiu inculpat, conform principiului non-contradictiei, facand abstractie de
faptul ca “procurorul” Lupu Mihai Cristian n-a consemnat, administrat si obiectivat probatoriul nici
macar pentru acuzare deoarece ii este imposibil sa-mi demonstreze vinovatia in baza unui probatoriu
care imi demonstreaza nevinovatia. Dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 nu a fost
trimise in judecata pentru ca sunt dosare inventate de asa-zisul procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian si asa-zisul
politist Popescu Lacramioara, evident fara probe consemnate, administrate si obiectivate in privinta
semnificatiei lor, folosite de grupul infractional din care acestia fac parte pentru a savarsi aceste abuzuri
criminale impotriva mea, urmarind vatamarea mea fizica si psihica sau uciderea mea pentru a ma reduce
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 256 of 403

la tacere. Conform art. 4 si art 99 din Codul de procedura penala, suspectul, adica cel impotriva caruia
nu exista probe, si inculpatul, beneficiaza pana la condamnarea definitiva de prezumtia de nevinovatie,
insa si aceasta condamnare se poate efectua doar cu respectarea garantiilor procesuale in cazul meu
absolut nerespectate, si cu dovedirea vinovatiei condamnatului in fapt si de drept ceea ce iarasi in cazul
meu nu s-a efectuat ceea ce este irelevant fiindca procurorul nu are capacitatea juridica de a condamna
pe nimeni, ceea ce iarasi demonstreaza nevinovatia mea prin refuzul “procurorului” Lupu Mihai Cristian
de a intocmi rechizitoriul si a ma trimite in judecata pentru a fi condamnat tocmai fiindca asemenea acte
judiciare sunt imposibil de realizat in baza unui probatoriu care-mi demonstreaza nevinovatia. Hotararea
din dosarul 907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei se intemeiaza pe art. 111 din vechiul Cod
Penal, corespondent art. 107 din noul Cod Penal in principal, si cf. art. 108-109 din CP, privind faptul ca
obligarea la tratament medical psihiatric are ca scop prevenirea infractionalitatii, si nu poate fi dispus in
consecinta decat unei persoane condamnate definitiv dar si dovedite stiintific a prezenta riscul de a
recidiva. Deoarece completul de judecata a dosarului 907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei
probabil a fost neglijent, neavand la cunostinta intreg ansamblul legii, coroborez la aceasta hotarare cu
faptul ca o hotarare de obligarea la tratament medical psihiatric nu este admisibila decat in cazul
persoanelor cu adevarat lipsite de discernamant, altfel, obligarea la tratamanetul medical psihiatric se
efectueaza numai cu CONSIMTAMANTUL LIBER al persoanei condamnate, aceasta fiind o dubla conditie,
adica persoana obligata la tratament medical psihiatric sa fie condamnata pentru infractiunea de
omorul sau pruncuciderea cf. art. 184 (1) din CPP, si sa-si dea CONSIMTAMANTUL cf. art. 29, 43 si altele
din Legea 487/2002, precum este obligatorie pentru expertizarea psihiatrica a condamnatului
CONSIMTAMANTUL LIBER cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP si cf. art. 11, 17 din Legea 487/2002. Exceptia situatiei
cand persoana CONDAMNATA nu are discernamant, se stabileste stiintific in fapt si de drept si nu se
falsifica asa cum au procedat asa-zisul procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian si asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici
Silviu si complicii sai, coroborand la toate celelalte evidente cu faptul ca prezenta este intocmita de mine
la fel ca si celelalte acte depuse de mine din dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016,
12718/231/2017 respectiv dosarele 14277/231/2015, 11224/231/2015 in care am anulat propunerile
falsificate identice adica mincinoase cu ca n-am discernamant ca-n 12718/231/2017, ceea ce
demonstreaza ca am mai mult discernamant normal decat asa-zisele organe judiciare care s-au
incriminat penal in flagrant, demonstrand ca reprezinta nu doar un pericol public ci si un pericol pentru
propria lor persoana, altfel spus, demonstrand lipsa de discernamant si pierderea totala a contactului cu
realitatea juridica, profesioanala si sociala, ceea ce reprezinta schizofrenia, si prin incalcarea in mod
pervaziv a legii si drepturilor persoanelor au demonstrat tulburarea antisociala de personalitate sau
sociopatia
In concluzie, cf. art. 107 in particular, si art. 108-109 din CP, numai condamnatii pot fi obligati la
tratament medical, respectiv cf. art. 184 (1) din CPP, doar condamnatii pentru omor sau pruncucidere SI
(nu “sau”) doar la propunerea procurorului motivata in fapt si de drept deci nu falsificata, si conform
jurisprudentei din dosarul 907/307/2010 coroborata cu principiul dreptului unitar cf. art. 124 din CR si
coroborata cu art. 107 din CP, doar daca se justifica stiintific periculozitatea condamnatului de a
recidiva, respectiv fiind imposibila d.p.d.v. legal expertizarea psihiatrica fara consimtamantul liber al
expertizatului cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP si art. 11 din Legea 487/2002, dar si obligarea la tratament medical
cf. art. 29, 43 si altele din Legea 487/2002, deoarece evident incarcerarea condamnatului rezolva aceeasi
problema a prevenirii fenomenului infractionalitatii, si dreptul la viata si integritatea fizica si psihica este
inalienabil in dreptul romanesc
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 257 of 403

Exceptie face cazul lipsei de discernamant insa doar stabilit legal si temeinic si nu falsificat asa
cum au procedat infractorii Lupu Mihai Cristian, Lucasievici Silviu si complicii lor. In realitate psihiatria
este o sarlatanie notorie, care trateaza simptomele si nu boala in cel mai bun caz, ceea ce nu e cu ce se
ocupa medicina, fapt recunoscut de insasi literatura de specialitate psihiatrica, motiv pentru care asa-
zisul procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian minte obsesiv ca nu am discernamant pentru a falsifica realitatea, fara
nici o proba macar circustantiala, si l-a instigat pe asa-zisul medic-legist Lucasievici Silviu sa minta ca am
“(cel mai probabil) ... discernamant mult diminuat”, in timp ce deasemenea a retinut ca am studii
superioare, gandire rapida, cultura generala s.a.m.d., evident asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici Silviu
neavand nici macar discernamant in calitate de infractor, incriminandu-se penal prin propriul fals
intelectual. Mai mult coroborez evidenta de notorietate a sanatatii mele mintale prin faptul ca lucrand 4
(patru) ani ca Programator IT (cf. COR) la SC ROMANIA HYPERMARCHE SA (CORA) si ALTEN SI-TEHNO,
am acumulat 4 (patru) certificate de medicina muncii care atesta ca sunt sanatos psihic si apt de munca,
precum pot chema martori, printre care chiar asa-zisul psihiatru Dutescu Mircea cu care m-am consultat
dupa ce interlopul Herghelegiu Danut, instigat de grupul infractional local din Focsani, a savarsit in
flagrant pe data de 05.12.2015 tentativa de Omor calificat si Vatamarea corporala impotriva mea, apoi
la serviciul de urgenta a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon” Focsani am fost injectat in cotul mainii drepte fara
acordul meu, cu o substanta necunoscuta de o persoana necunoscuta care a crezut ca nu voi simti, iar
dupa ce am deschis dosare penale interlopului Herghelegiu Danut si complicilor sai, in scopul abuzarii
mele pentru a renunta la dreptate sau a ma reduce la tacere prin vatamarea mea fizica si psihica, asa-
zisul procuror Mihaila Paul a inceput a falsifica acte de procedura in dosarul 2417/P/2014 care a fost
inventat aproape concomitent cu tentativa de Omor calificat si Vatamarea corporala din 05.12.2014
savarsita de interlopul Herghelegiu Danut, apoi asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul a falsificat propunerea de
internarea mea nevoluntara 11224/231/2015 pe care a pierdut-o si ulterior a falsificat propunerea de
obligarea mea la tratament medical 14277/231/2015 pe care a pierdut-o constituind evident tentativa
grupului infractional local de a ma pune intr-o situatie de vulnerabilitate pentru a ma vatama prin
injectarea cu substante toxice, lovire sau in alte moduri, fapt pe care l-am demonstrat in multe alte
moduri indicate in inscrisurile anexate in dosarul 11224/231/2015 anexat la dosarul 14277/231/2015
In dovedire invoc principiul aplicarii unitare a dreptului cf. art. 124 din Constitutia Romanie si
jurisprudenta dosarului 907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei din care citez conform
articolului de specialitate de la adresa: http://www.juridice.ro/346691/romania-la-cedo-cauza-pendinte-
ivascu-internarea-medicala-nevoluntara-la-ordinul-procurorului-dreptul-la-viata-privata-si-raspunderea-
statului.html

La 19 octombrie 2009, procuratura a solicitat instanței pronunțarea unui ordin de tratament psihiatric
obligatoriu. Într-o decizie finală din data de 1 septembrie 2010, Judecătoria Sighetu Marmației a respins
cererea procurorului. Instanța a considerat că, în temeiul articolului 111 din Codul penal, măsurile de
siguranță (cum ar fi admiterea obligatorie într-o unitate medicală și un ordin de a urma un tratament
psihiatric) au drept scop să pună capăt unor situații periculoase și pentru a preveni fenomenul
infracțional. De aceea, ele ar trebui impuse doar persoanelor care au săvârșit infracțiuni prevăzute de
dreptul penal. Prin urmare, un ordin pentru a urma un tratament psihiatric nu poate fi impus
reclamantului până când nu se va stabili că acesta a comis o infracțiune, dar și că există pericolul de a
comite alte infracțiuni pe viitor.

ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 258 of 403

Prin hotararea judecatoreasca din dosarul 907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei


probez faptul moral pe care-l consider de notorietate, ca este ilegal a supune o persoana nevinovata la
tratament medical obligatoriu, sau o persoana care beneficiaza de prezumtia de nevinovatie in cazul
meu in calitate de NEVINOVAT in dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 avand obiectul
Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei, precum am beneficiat de prezumtia de nevinovatie cf. art. 4 si art. 99
din CPP si in calitatea ilegal si netemeinic stabilita de suspect / inculpat pana la data de 01.08.2017 cand
asa-zisul procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian a emis ordonanta de clasare pe care a falsificat-o declarand ca am
savarsit infractiunea de Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei fara sa probeze aceasta printr-o hotarare
judecatoreasca definitiva, suspect insemnand ca nu exista probe impotriva mea, inculpat insemnand
acuzat nu condamnat, motiv pentru care am formulat plangere penala prealabila pentru Falsul in
declaratii si Inducerea in eroare a organelor judiciare impotriva asa-ziselor organe judiciare implicate in
dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016
In dovedire invoc prezumtia de nevinovatie a suspectului cf. art. 4 si art. 99 din CPP

Cod de procedura penala


Art. 4 - Prezumtia de nevinovatie
(1) Orice persoana este considerata nevinovata pana la stabilirea vinovatiei sale printr-o hotarare penala
definitiva.

Cod de procedura penala


Art. 99 - Sarcina probei
(2) Suspectul sau inculpatul beneficiaza de prezumtia de nevinovatie, nefiind obligat sa isi dovedeasca
nevinovatia, si are dreptul de a nu contribui la propria acuzare.

In dovedire, am anexat la dosarul 14277/231/2015 pe data de 21.12.2015 23:21 prin emailul


intitulat “CERERE DE ANEXARE A INSCRISULUI ATASAT LA MAPA PRESEDINTELUI COMPLETULUI DE
JUDECATA A DOSARULUI 14277/231/2015, TERMEN: 28.12.2015”, cererea adresata completului de
judecata a dosarului 14277/231/2015 ca daca nu considera suficienta legea si literatura de specialitate
infatisand un aspect relevant dosarului 14277/231/2015 din hotararea din 907/307/2010, sa faca o
adresa de aducere a hotararii din 907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei precum m-a
informat BIRP Judecatoria Sighetu – Marmatiei ca se procedeaza
Aceeasi cerere o adresez instantei in dosarul 12718/231/2017 prin solicitarea de a aduce dosarul
14277/231/2015 pentru aflarea adevarului, sustinerea apararii mele si demonstratia incalcarii
principiului ne bis idem dat fiind ca sunt iarasi chemat in judecata cu o propunere inadmisibila si
nefondata de obligarea la tratament medical, fiind acuzat de fapte fictive cu documente “medicale”
contrafacute exact la fel in 12718/231/2017 ca si-n 14277/231/2015

3. Privind inadmisibilitatea obligarii la tratament medical deoarece nu sunt realizate conditiile


legale ale art. 566-572 din CPP si art. 109 (1) din CP
Referatul cu propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical este motivat pe art. 109 din Codul
Penal fapt pentru care este inadmisibil deoarece nu am fost condamnat si prin urmare nu sunt faptuitor
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 259 of 403

deopotriva demonstrat precum si conform prezumtiei de nevinovatie privind suspectul si inculpatul, si


prin urmare invoc urmatoarea situatie in fapt in explicitare:
3.1. pe 01.08.2017 asa-zisul procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian a avut un episod maniacal crezandu-se
judecator m-a condamnat pentru o infractiune care n-am savarsit-o prin ordonanta de renuntarea la
urmarirea penala nelegala si netemeinica din 01.08.2017 din dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si
4329/P/2016 in care a mintit vadit ca am savarsit infractiunea de Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei
deoarece probele marturii si probe materiale audio a inregistrarilor de sedinta imi demonstreaza
nevinovatia, precum si faptul ca asa-zisul procuror a refuzat sa consemneze si sa administreze
probatoriul inclusiv pentru acuzare deoarece-i este imposibil sa foloseasca probe ce-mi demonstreaza
nevinovatia pentru a-mi demonstra vinovatia, iarasi imi demonstraza nevinovatia, precum si lipsa
premizelor din propozitiile categorice si silogismul motivarii ordonantei imi demonstreaza nevinovatia si
faptul ca ordonanta este falsificata adica deopotriva ilegala continand numeroase si vadite incalcari ale
legii, netemeinica datorita invaliditatii sau lipsei motivarii in fapt si de drept, si de rea-credinta criminala
facand referire la alte acte juridice vadit falsificate de niste asa-zisi psihiatri si medici legisti precum
dealtfel am demonstrat in prezenta,
3.2. constat ca nu am nici macar la modul tehnic calitatea de inculpat in dosarele 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 deoarece sunt nevinovat pentru multitudinea de motive in fapt si de drept
invocate mai sus, adica in mod nelegal si netemeinic am fost acuzat si urmarit penal peste 12 luni in
scopul de a fi santajat apoi vatamat corporal pentru a fi redus la tacere cu privire la denunturile mele in
legatura cu activitatea criminala a acelorasi asa-zise organe judiciare care m-au acuzat si urmarit
netemeinic, implicit in dosarul 12718/231/2017 nu am calitatatea de inculpat, si evident nici calitatea
intimat, infractor sau recidivist sau orice alta calitate decat cea de nevinovat, motiv pentru care solicit sa
mi va adresati cu calitatea de nevinovat, precum solicit ca aceasta calitate sa fie consemnata in
evidenta informatizata care apare pe saitul Judecatoriei Focsani, pentru a se cunoaste public ca in
calitate de nevinovat grupul infractional din Focsani urmareste vatamarea sau uciderea mea sub
pretextul obligarii la tratament medical.
3.3. Asa-zisul procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian mi-a incalcat in flagrant dreptul fundamental al
prezumtiei de nevinovatie stabilit prin art. 4 si art. 99 din CPP, 23 (11) din CR si tratatele ratificate de
Romania adica cf. art. 6 (2) din CEDO si art. 11 din Declaratia Universala a Drepturilor Omului, mintind
ca am savarsit infractiunea de Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei prin care se subintelege ca am fost
condamnat printr-o hotarare definitiva, precum a si instigat pe asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici Silviu si
alti coautori care au falsificat mai multe rapoarte de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica, mintind ca n-am
discernamant, ca sunt violent, ca am istoric judiciar prin care se subintelege ca am cazier penal s.a.m.d.
In dovedirea incalcarii prezumtiei de nevinovatie pe langa demonstratia in fapt sau premiza
particulara a silogismului acestei intampinari invoc legea sau premiza universala:

art. 11 din Declaratia Universala a Drepturilor Omului


Orice persoana acuzata de comiterea unui act cu caracter penal are dreptul sa fie presupusa
nevinovata pina cind vinovatia sa va fi stabilita in mod legal in cursul unui proces public in care i-au fost
asigurate toate garantiile necesare apararii sale.

art. 6 (2) din Conventia Europeana a Drepturilor Omului


Orice persoană acuzată de o infracţiune este prezumată nevinovată pînă ce vinovăţia sa va fi
legal stabilită
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 260 of 403

art. 23 (11) din Constitutia Romaniei


Până la rămânerea definitivă a hotărârii judecătoreşti de condamnare, persoana este
considerată nevinovată.

Codul de procedura penala


art. 4
Orice persoană este considerată nevinovată până la stabilirea vinovăţiei sale printr-o hotărâre
penală definitivă.

art. 99
Suspectul sau inculpatul beneficiază de prezumţia de nevinovăţie, nefiind obligat să îşi
dovedească nevinovăţia, şi are dreptul de a nu contribui la propria acuzare.

Nu in ultimul rand, evident infaptuirea justitiei este prerogativa exclusiva a judecatorului,


neputand fi condamnat de un procuror.
In dovedire invoc legea

Art. 2 din Legea 304/2004 privind organizarea judiciara


(2) Justiţia se realizează prin următoarele instanţe judecătoreşti:
a) Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie;
b) curţi de apel;
c) tribunale;
d) tribunale specializate;
e) instanţe militare;
f) judecătorii.

Art. 1. din Legea 303/2004 privind statutul magistratilor


Magistratura este activitatea judiciară desfăşurată d e judecători în scopul înfăptuirii justiţiei şi de
procurori în scopul apărării intereselor generale ale societăţii, a ordinii de drept, precum şi a drepturilor
şi libertăţilor cetăţenilor.

Este evident faptul ca am fost urmarit penal in dosarele inventate 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si
4329/P/2016 pentru ca asa-zisele organele judiciare sa savarseasca abuzuri grave impotriva mea,
deoarece fapta nu exista si atunci evident probele impotriva mea nu exista, coroborat cu faptul ca toate
probele din dosar imi demonstreaza nevinovatia si conform principiului non-contradictiei nu-mi pot
dovedi vinovatia in acelasi timp si sub acelasi raport

In concluzie deoarece nu am calitate procesuala in dosarul 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si


4329/P/2016 datorita aberatiei neconstitutionale a renuntarii la urmarirea penala care a incheiat
urmarirea penala, implicit n-am calitate procesuala pasiva in dosarul 12718/231/2017 atat datorita
clasarii cat si datorita dreptului la prezumtia de nevinovatie cf. art. 23 (11) din CR si art. 6 (2) din CEDO
conform caruia nu pot fi obligat la “tratament medical” psihiatric adica sa fiu vatamat corporal pentru
fapte care nu le-am savarsit comform prezumtiei de nevinovatie, precum si fiindca acuzatiile sunt fictive,
motiv pentru care rog completul de judecata a dosarului 12718/231/2017 sa ia act ca nu am calitate
procesuala pasiva deoarece nu am si nu pot avea nici calitatea de suspect, nici de inculpat, nici de
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 261 of 403

condamnat ci doar aceea de nevinovat, motiv pentru care evident nu am calitatea de condamnat adica
faptuitor pentru a ma putea incadra la conditiile art. 109 din CP
Coroborat cu faptul ca supunerea la tratament medical a suspectului sau chiar a inculpatului
este o aberatie judiciara cf. art. 4 si art. 99 din Codul de procedura penala privind prezumtia de
nevinovatie, si cf. art. 107 in principal si cf. art. 108-109 din CP, asa cum prea bine a hotarat instanta
Judecatoriei Sighetu - Marmatiei in dosarul 907/307/2010, precum citez din literatura de specialitate
care infatiseaza aceasta la adresa: http://www.juridice.ro/346691/romania-la-cedo-cauza-pendinte-
ivascu-internarea-medicala-nevoluntara-la-ordinul-procurorului-dreptul-la-viata-privata-si-raspunderea-
statului.html

La 19 octombrie 2009, procuratura a solicitat instanței pronunțarea unui ordin de tratament psihiatric
obligatoriu. Într-o decizie finală din data de 1 septembrie 2010, Judecătoria Sighetu Marmației a respins
cererea procurorului. Instanța a considerat că, în temeiul articolului 111 din Codul penal, măsurile de
siguranță (cum ar fi admiterea obligatorie într-o unitate medicală și un ordin de a urma un tratament
psihiatric) au drept scop să pună capăt unor situații periculoase și pentru a preveni fenomenul
infracțional. De aceea, ele ar trebui impuse doar persoanelor care au săvârșit infracțiuni prevăzute de
dreptul penal. Prin urmare, un ordin pentru a urma un tratament psihiatric nu poate fi impus
reclamantului până când nu se va stabili că acesta a comis o infracțiune, dar și că există pericolul de a
comite alte infracțiuni pe viitor.

Motive pentru care formulez inca o cerere de sesizare a Curtii Constitutionale pentru a declara
neconstitutionale art. 566-572 din CPP. Elementul cheie al neconstitutionalitatii art. 566-572 in
contradictie cu prezumtia de nevinovatie cf. art. 23 (11) din Constitutia Romaniei, este prin raportare
textul art. 109 din Codul penal care reprezinta conditia, citez: "daca faptuitorul ... prezinta pericol pentru
societate". Conform art. 107 (2) din CP, faptuitorul este "persoana care a comis o fapta prevazuta de
legea penala, nejustificata", ori cf. art. 4 si art. 99 din CPP, si art. 23 (11) din CR privind prezumtia de
nevinovatie, si stabilirea daca o persoana a comis o fapta prevazuta de legea penala, nejustificata, prin
demonstratia existentei faptei si a savarsirii faptei penale de catre o persoana cu respectarea integrala a
garantiilor procesuale a acelei persoane, este prerogativa exclusiva a judecatorului de a infaptui justitia
printr-o hotarare judecatoreasca, cf. art. 1 din Legea 303/2004 privind statutul magistratilor si art. 2 din
Legea 304/2004 privind organizarea judiciara. Deasemenea daca faptuitorului i se aplica sau nu o
pedeapsa este deasemenea prerogativa judecatorului, deoarece este unicul in masura a infaptui justitia
si stabili ca o persoana a comis o fapta prevazuta de legea penala, nejustificata, ori fiindca dovedit
sarlatania numita psihiatrie implicit eronat medicina este utilizata pentru a Vatama corporal, neavand
capacitatea de a trata nimic conform marturiilor de notorietate a insusi psihiatrilor si conform
documentarului stiintific “Comercializarea nebuniei” - en. “The marketing of madness”, de drept speta
privind orice obligare raportat la psihiatrie este nula deoarece cf. art. 22 din Constitutia Romaniei
Coroborez aceasta cu jurisprudenta, hotararea dosarului 907/307/2010 si in temeiul principului
dreptului unitar cf. art. 124 din Constitutia Romaniei “Dreptul la viaţă, precum şi dreptul la integritate
fizică şi psihică ale persoanei sunt garantate. Nimeni nu poate fi supus torturii şi nici unui fel de pedeapsă
sau de tratament inuman ori degradant. Pedeapsa cu moartea este interzisă” cu mentiunea ca este
documentat precum si de notorietate ca otrava neurotoxica Invega provoaca inclusiv moartea pe langa
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 262 of 403

sute de alte vatamari corporale fizice permanente, fiind bazata pe fluor adica metoda nazista de
represiune

Cu aceasta ocazie rog completul de judecata sa ia act si de faptul ca raportul de expertiza


medico-legala psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232 din presupusa data de 17.09.2015 din 2417/P/2014 contine
un diagnostic prezumtiv, deoarece inafara de faptul ca este vadit falsificat, este inscris cu, citez “cel mai
probabil”, precum poate constata completul de judecata la fila 103 din dosarul 14277/231/2015
reprezentand ultima fila din raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232 din
presupusa data de 17.09.2015. Deoarece aceiasi “medici” au intocmit toate asa-zisele certificate
medico-legale psihiatrice este vadita alienarea mintala a acestora din incoerenta in motivarea acestora
despre care reamintesc aberatii cum ar fi ca au declarat ca am studii superioare, gandire rapida, cultura
generala si sunt lipsit concomitent de discernamant, sau ca am istoric judiciar adica cazier penal ceea ce
e evident o minciuna. Deoarece toate asa-zisele acte medicale au fost falsificate de aceiasi autori privind
fapte fictive, evident acestea trebuie sa corespunda insa nu corespund tocmai fiindca precum se spune
popular ca minciuna are picioare scurte, memoria mincinosilor este scurta ca si mintea lor si sunt
incoerenti in ticluirea de acte false, deopotriva in continutul fiecarui act falsificate precum si comparativ
actele falsificate sunt incoerente intre ele dar si cu realitatea vadita a dosarelor tocmai fiindca sunt
falsificate grosolan tipic caracterului grobian al falsificatorilor
Mai mult, am demonstrat si faptul ca diagnosticul prezumtiv este falsificat prin faptul ca am
dovedit fondul asa-zisului raport de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica falsificat in mai multe moduri,
fara a aborda toate minciunile proferate de asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici Silviu care a redactat
raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatric, pentru a nu urmari proverbiala piatra aruncata in lac si
aglomera dosarul 14277/231/2015 pe care l-am solicitat a fi adus in 12718/231/2017. In cel mai scurt
mod am demonstrat falsitatea diagnosticului prezumtiv de tulburarea de personalitate paranoida prin
faptul ca aceasta fanfaronada lingvistica se poate inlocui cu afirmatia ca o persoana este suspicioasa, ori
am demonstrat ca nu sunt o persoana suspicioasa prin faptul ca am discutat cu asa-zisii psihiatri amiabil
pe 17.09.2015, fara a considera ca sunt intr-atat de nebuni incat sa se incrimineze penal in flagrant -
evident fiind nebuneste a crede ca nu unul sau doi, ci 5 (cinci) psihiatri sunt nu doar infractori ci si
schizofrenici si sociopati dat fiind ca ocupa functia de medici psihiatri, dar intr-adevar pe de alta parte,
sociopatii aproape intotdeauna se organizeaza in gasti, ceea ce e doar natural pentru niste animale, si
mint in mod obsesiv fiind capabili sa insele vigilenta unor naivi, sau sa ocupe o pozitie sociala prin fapte
penale impotriva libertatii sau fapte de coruptie, adica mai precis prin Hartuire, Amenintare si Santaj,
respectiv prin Darea de mita, Luarea de Mita si Traficul de influenta
Mai mult, am demonstrat in prezenta ca diagnosticul “psihoza acuta predominant deliranta”
este falsificat deoarece nu am fost expertizat psihiatric ci am fost detinut pe 27.05.2017 de la examenele
la facultatea de drept de la centrul Focsani al Universitatii Ecologice de la Scoala generala “Anghel
Saligny” Focsani unde sunt student in anul I de 3 securisti in civil, am fost incarcerat si legat la psihiatrie
fara justificare si fara un diagnostic otravit prin injectare cu neurotoxine pe baza de fluor si clor adica
Haloperidol, Invega respectiv Diazepam si Prazolex. Prospectul Invega precizez infatiseaza sute de efecte
negative permanente documentate stiintific inclusiv moartea si nici un efect pozitiv documentat
stiintific. Pe durata internarii am fost abuzat fizic si Vatamat corporal si amenintat de asa-zisul psihiatru
curant Barbarosie ca daca refuz sa consimt sa fiu “expertizat” si “tratat” voi fi obligat la fel prin abuz fizic
si Vatamare corporala. Am fost obligat astfel prin amenintare la un test de urina care a demonstrat ca
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 263 of 403

nu ma droghez ci psihiatrii si organele judiciare halucineaza ca ma droghez din moment ce au dispus un


asemenea test in special fiindca nici macar nu m-a acuzat cineva ca ma droghez, si mi s-au prelevat
impotriva vointei mele 3 fiole de sange fara sa reiasa iarasi nici o problema cum ca ma droghez si prin
urmare nici un motiv pentru acest test decat sa fiu Vatamat corporal precum atesta si intentia asa-
zisului psihiatru curant sa ma oblige sa fiu iradiat cu un test CT care nu este pentru creier ci pentru
oasele capului si iradiaza de sute de ori mai mult ca o analiza normala cu raze X. La asa-zisele examene
psihologice am constatat aceleasi intrebari la care am raspuns la examinarile pentru medicina muncii de
mai multe ori sau la recrutare si incorporare in armata, la care am raspuns in mod identic si fiindca nu
am fost diagnosticat de medicina muncii sau de medicina armatei cu aceleasi diagnostice atunci este
dovedit mai presus de orice dubii rezonabile ca fisa de externare din 08.06.2017 a Sectiei de psihiatrie a
Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon” este falsificata precum demonstrez prin proba 5 reprezentand pledoaria mea
detaliata privind modul in care a fost falsificata aceasta mai precis prin incalcarea legii si falsificarea in
mod generic a realitatii de fapt adica printr-un delir de termeni psihiatrici aruncati la intamplare fara nici
o acoperire in fapte reale cu care ar fi trebui sa se coreleze aceste inferente pentru a fi valide, motiv
pentru care testele se si contrazic tocmai fiindca sunt fara acoperire in realitatea de fapt si emise de
mincinosi diferiti, precum aceste minciuni sunt mai ales in contradictie cu legea si logica juridica pe care
trebuie sa se intameieze toate actele juridice. Prospectul Invega precizez infatiseaza sute de efecte
negative permanente documentate stiintific inclusiv moartea si nici un efect pozitiv documentat
stiintific. Invega este de notorietate conform prospectului o neurotoxina promovata de o companie
americana ca tratament pentru schizofrenie, companie condamnata repetat pentru comercializarea de
otravuri drept medicamente conform evidentei publice din enciclopedia de pe internet wikipedia.com
care referentiaza din presa si evidenta publica a sistemului judiciar SUA numeroase procese pierdute de
aceasta companie, precum si realitatea puternicei otravuri Invega care provoaca dizabilitati permanente
de invatare si memorare ceea ce se coreleaza cu actul criminal de a ma aresta ilegal de la examenele la
facultatea de drept in baza unor proceduri vadit ilegale deci falsificate precum demonstrez pe scurt prin
realitatea de drept ca doar fata de suspectii si acuzatii de omor sau pruncucidere se poate dispune
expertiza psihiatrica cf. art. 184 (1) din CPP si chiar si atunci aceasta fiind posibila doar cu
consimtamantul acestora, altfel cf. art. 4 (2) din CPP orice indoiala a procurorului se interpreteaza in
favoarea suspectului sau inculpatului, existand numeroase alte moduri de a demonstra gravele abuzuri
savarsite de ceea ce se poate numi mafia magistratilor si tortionarii lor “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici”
s.a.m.d., demonstratii pe care le-am anexat la dosarele penale 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si
4329/P/2016 sub forma unei plangeri penale prealabile impotriva asa-ziselor organe judiciare din dosar,
reclamanti si alti complici si instigatori precum in cazul de notorietate d-l Berbeceanu si-a incriminat si
ulterior condamnat acuzatorii mincinosi. Evident nici unul din diagnostice nu e schizofrenia ca sa fiu
“tratat” pentru schizofrenie cu otrava neurotoxica pe baza de fluor Invega deci iarasi aceasta este o
dovada a falsificarii acestui document, precum insusi faptul ca declararea ca studentia la facultatea de
drept e “psihoza acuta predominant deliranta” si “paranoia premorbida” este vadit o aberatie a
regimului totalitar impus de mafia magistratilor in Romania, dat fiind ca n-am fost intrebat nimic din
dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 sau in legatura cu acestea ci am fost arestat de la
examenele la facultatea de drept legat si otravit precum s-a retinut in fisa de externare pe care o retin
drept proba inscris a acestei stari de fapt impreuna cu procesul verbal al securistilor in civil care m-au
arestat de la Scoala generala “Anghel Saligny” Focsani unde urma sa sustin examenele la centrul
Universitatii Ecologice, iar continutul fisei falsificate de externare insusi n-are nici o legatura cu
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 264 of 403

raspunsurile mele la testele psihologice, precum nici macar la audierea contrafacuta a Comisiei care
trebuia sa ma puna in libertate conform legii si evidentelor nu s-a interesat de vadita mea nevinovatie ci
membrii acesteia au mintit acuzandu-ma ca “sunt pericol public” fara nici o dovada sau logica,
incalcandu-mi prezumtia de nevinovatie cf. art. 6 (2) din CEDO, si ca sa-si justifice crimele, precum
pentru musamalizarea minciunilor lor nu mi-au comunicat procesul verbal intocmit
Confom “literaturii de specialitate” psihiatrice, expertizarea psihiatrica se realizeaza doar prin
interviu cf. art. 10 din Legea 487/2002, si facand abstractie de evidenta faptului ca insasi aceasta este o
imposibilitate stiintifica de a stabili adevarul deoarece in principal sociopatii sunt mitomaniaci, adica
mint si falsifica rezultatul asa-zisei expertize, deasemenea este evident ca expertiza nu se poate realiza
decat cu privire la starea actuala in momentul interviului a intervievatului adica nici cu privire la trecut,
nici la viitor, precum demonstrez invocand din Regulamentul intern al institutului de psihiatrie “Socola”
Iasi (dat fiind ca in contradictoriu cu legea la Focsani deliberat nu mi s-a acordat dreptul la informare cu
privire la lege si regulament pe care dealtfel asa-zisii psihiatri locali le-au incalcat in mod pervaziv cu rea-
credinta, cf. art. 122 din Regulamentul intern al institutului de psihiatrie “Socola” Iasi “Faptul ca o
persoana a fost ingrijita ori spitalizata in trecut nu justifica un diagnostic prezent sau viitor de tulburare
psihica” care fiind act normativ al legii nu poate fi decat identic cu toate regulamentele din tara, inclusiv
cel al Sectiei de psihiatrie a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon” Focsani unde am fost Vatamat corporal grav.
Fiindca nu am fost “ingrijita ori spitalizata in trecut” vreodata si evident fiindca am fost Vatamat
corporal grav la Sectia de psihiatrie a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon” Focsani dealtfel fara nici un diagnostic
obtinut in mod direct cf. art. 10 din Lega 487/2002, demonstreaza ca fisa de externare si toate celelalte
documente falsificate de acesti “psihiatri” sunt vadit falsificate deoarece n-au nici o legatura cu trecutul,
prezentul sau viitorul meu fiindca nu pot avea nici o legatura deoarece nu am fost persoana “ingrijita ori
spitalizata in trecut”, ori am demonstrat oricum ca asa-zisele examinari psihologice au fost identice cu
cele pe care le-am sustinut repetat la medicina muncii, recrutare / incorporare si cu alte ocazii probabil,
ori fiindca am raspuns identic si in trecut n-am fost diagnoticat cu asa-zisele tulburari de personalitate,
cel putin nu cu stiinta mea dat fiind ca evidentele arata ca “psihiatrii” isi justifica existenta falsificand in
mod pervaziv documente dar si facand experimente nelegale si drogand persoane nevinovate precum
am demonstrat invocand comunicatul SRI catre parchetul general de notorietate privind aceasta stare
de fapt precum si numeroase dosare in care au fost condamnati nevinovati la “tratament medical” fara
sa savarseasca nici o fapta din care sa se poate infera ca sufera de orice “tulburare psihica”,
este in concluzie demonstrat mai presus de orice dubii rezonabile ca nu sufara ca si-n trecut in
campul muncii de exemplu, certificat de medicina muncii, de nici o “tulburare psihica”, deci toate
documentele “psihiatrice” impotriva mea sunt falsificate, cu precizarea ca utilizarea ghilimelelor asupra
cuvantului “psihiatrice” desemneaza faptul ca aceasta falsa stiinta medicala are norme pe care asa-zisii
psihiatri din Focsani le-au incalcat oricum, adica documentele “psihiatrice” sunt dublu falsificate, odata
in raport cu realitatea faptului ca psihiatria este o sarlatanie, o pseudostiinta medicala, si a doua ca
oricum “psihiatrii” vranceni si-au incalcat propriile norme profesionale si legea, fiind evident ca in aceste
regulamente si lege nu s-ar fi scris ca o persoana poate fi detinuta arbitrar la psihiatrie si ca psihiatria
este o sarlatanie, ci tocmai, activitatea psihiatrica este conditionata de consimtamantul fraierilor adica a
ignorantilor - victimele oricarei escrocherii din lume dealtfel, consimtamant care in cazul meu a fost
viciat in primul rand fiindca am refuzat sa fiu Vatamat Corporal, Lipsit de libertate in mod ilegal s.a.m.d.
ceea ce constitutie infractiuni, insa acest grup infractional organizat m-a Vatamat Corporal si Lipsit de
libertate in mod ilegal s.a.m.d. utilizand violenta si amenintarea cu violenta
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 265 of 403

Pentru a elimina orice indoiala asupra sanatatii mele psihice, coroborez chiar la dovada faptului
ca nu sunt suspicios macar ci rational, prin evidenta faptului ca nu am deschis dosar penal asa-ziselor
organe judiciare si asa-zisilor medici, decat dupa ce au savarsit in flagrant infractiunile de falsurile in
inscrisuri, infractiunile de serviciu, infractiunile de impiedicarea infaptuirii justitiei, infractiunile
impotriva libertatii persoanei, infractiunile de coruptie si alte infractiuni

In continuare demonstrez in baza literaturii de specialitate si a probei 2 reprezentand un


documentar subtitrat in romana privind realitatea faptului ca pshiatria este o sarlatanie, si prin urmare
art. 566-572 din Codul de procedura penala si altele asemenea sunt introduse in sprijinul acestei
sarlatanii. Tulburarile de personalitate nu sunt boli ci denumiri inventate si atribuite unor sentimente
sau complexe sentimentale normale, menite sa creeze o imagine de autenticitate si sa mascheze
realitatea faptului ca psihiatria nu este o stiinta medicala deoarece nu poate trata nici o asa-zisa boala
sau nici o asa-zisa tulburare de personalitate. In realitate prin asa-zisa medicamentatie psihiatrica nu se
trateaza nici o asa-zisa boala psihiatrica fiindca acestea nu exista, si in mod vadit psihiatrii habar nu au s-
o administreze in scopul declarat urmarit, dovedit prin faptul ca daca-i confrunti cerandu-le sa
demonstreze stiintific cum functioneaza asa-zisa medicamentatie prescrisa si beneficiul care-l aduce
pacientului, fac crize de nervi tipic mincinosilor confruntati cu propria minciuna ceea ce demonstreaza
ca sunt sociopati mitomaniaci - persoane care sacrifica vietile altora pentru a-si atinge interesele, si care
incalca legea si drepturile persoanelor in mod pervaziv. In fapt, chiar in rastimpul de o ora in care am
fost Lipsit de libertate in mod iliegal pe 17.09.2015 de asa-zisa Comisie de expertiza medico-legala
psihiatrica, una din doamnele blonde a proferat aberatia cum ca psihiatria si sistemul endocrin n-au nici
o legatura, ori, dovada scurta este specialitatea interdisciplinara neuroendocrinologia, si evidenta de
cultura generala a faptului ca medicamentatia psihiatrica are ca principiu activ afectarea substantelor
neurotransmitatoare, adica a hormonilor eliberati de sistemul neuroendocrin, dintre care enumar pe cei
mai cunoscuti: serotonina, dopamina si noradrenalina, si asa-zisul tratament medical se bazeaza pe
ipoteza ca toate tulburarile de personalitate sunt cauzate de un dezechilibru hormonal, in timp ce
evident asa-zisii psihiatri habar nu au daca exista sau nu o legatura intre o stare psihica si sistemul
endocrin, dar prescriu medicamentatie care afecteaza sistemul endocrin fara sa stie cum, provocand de
fiecare data tulburarea pe care mint ca o trateaza
Insasi psihiatria recunoaste ca tulburarile de personalitate nu sunt boli, citez din literatura de
specialitate de la adresa: http://www.sanatateatv.ro/articole-medicale/psihiatrie/tulburarea-de-
personalitate-o-problema-grava-din-punct-de-vedere-social/
"
Tulburarile de personalitate nu reprezinta o boala în sine.
...
Tulburarile de personalitate propriu-zise nu sunt niste boli pentru ca bolile, conform definitiei acestora
trebuie sa aiba un debut, o evolutie, un sfârsit, fie o vindecare, fie o cronicizare.
...
a declarat într-un interviu pentru www.sanatateatv.ro, prof. univ. dr. Florin Tudose, sef Departamentul
de Psihiatrie, Spitalul Universitar de Urgenta Bucuresti.
"
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 266 of 403

si coroborez prin alt citat de la adresa: http://www.csid.ro/boli-afectiuni/psihiatrie/tulburarile-de-


personalitate-12840213/
"
Tulburarile de personalitate nu se incadreaza in tiparul clasic de boala. Nu au un debut limitat in timp, o
perioada de stare si apoi !o vindecare in urma unui tratament!. Nefiind boli au fost denumite dezvoltari
dizarmonice ale structurii psihice ale persoanei in cauza.
"
Repet din citat: "NU AU ... O VINDECARE IN URMA UNUI TRATAMENT! NEFIIND BOLI..."

Aceasta realitate o demonstrez prin documentarul "Comercializarea nebuniei" pe care-l anexez


la dosarul 12718/231/2017 prin cererea de aducere a dosarului 14277/231/2015 la care este anexat ca
proba 2, si din care nu este necesar decat a se viziona primele 5 minute si 20 de secunde care sunt
edificatoare, infatisand marturia mai multor psihologi si pacienti, demonstrand stiintific sarlatania
practicata sub denumirea de psihiatrie, care in Romania evident este utilizata ca o arma de terorism, de
intimidare, de constrangere si de hartuire precum este evident in dosarul 14277/231/2015, si arma
pentru Vatamarea corporala, Supunerea la rele tratamente, Lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal si
savarsirea de alte infractiuni grave precum atesta dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016, 4329/P/2016 si
12718/231/2017, precum este de notorietate evident motivul - fiindca am facut publica pe internet
activitatea grupului infractional care a falsificat aceste dosare si documentele in legatura cu acestea,
impreuna cu dosarele lor penale pentru a se identifica cu usurinta vinovatii daca acestia reusesc sa ma
vateme grav astfel incat sa nu ma mai pot apara si urmari condamnarea lor, sau sa omoare, precum am
demonstrat,
in inscrisul anexat la dosarul 11224/231/2015 pe care solicit sa fie adus deasemenea in
12718/231/2017 deoarece prezinta acelasi raport ne bis idem ca si 14277/231/2015 cu care a fost in
acelasi raport, privind sesizarea Comisiilor de cercetarea abuzurilor din Senat si Camera Deputatilor, si
in inscrisul anexat la dosarul 11224/231/2015 pe care solicit sa fie adus deasemenea in
12718/231/2017 deoarece prezinta acelasi raport ne bis idem ca si 14277/231/2015 cu care a fost in
acelasi raport, privind cererea de punere sub programul de protectie a martorilor
Conform probei materiale audio-video anexate, prin tratament medical psihiatric este in mod
constant vatamat sistemul nervos si introdusa starea de depresie majora si ideatizarea sinuciderii,
acesta fiind adevaratul motiv pentru care grupul infractional local a introdus actiunea de obligarea mea
la tratament medical, pentru a ma vatama prin injectarea cu substante toxice sau in alte moduri, sau
chiar ucide, aceasta fiind a saptea tentativa de Omor calificat si Vatamarea corporala (primele doua
fiind 27.10.2014-05.12.2014 de catre interlopul Herghelegiu Danut instigat de acest grup infractional
organizat, urmatoarele patru fiind actiuni psihiatrice falsificate dintre care am si anulat pe primele trei
drept dovada adica 11224/231/2015 si 14277/231/2015 la fond si contestatie, urmata de actiunea vadit
falsificata 4909/231/2017 in acelasi mod ca 11224/231/2015 prin care am fost Vatamat corporal grav in
perioada 27.05.2017-08.06.2017, urmata de dosarul falsificat 12718/231/2017 in acelasi mod ca
14277/231/2015, mafia urmarind lichidarea mea pentru a nu le denunta activitatea criminala precum
am demonstrat in dosarele lor penale. Dosarele 11224/231/2015 si 4909/231/2017 avand obiectul
internarea nevoluntara in scopul examinarii mele psihiatrice care evident n-are nici o logica juridica din
moment ce nu-mi voi da vreodata consimtamantul sa fiu vatamat de sarlatania numita psihiatria,
adevaratul motiv fiind obsesia grupului infractional local de a ma pune intr-o situatie de vulnerabilitate
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 267 of 403

pentru a ma vatama prin injectare cu substante toxice sau in alte moduri, precum am fost injectat fara
acordul meu cu o substanta necunoscuta in zona cotului drept, de catre o persoana necunoscuta,
crezand ca nu simt, la serviciul de urgenta a Spitalului "Sf. Pantelimon" Focsani dupa ce am fost
transportat in urma tentativei de Omor calificat si Vatamarea corporala savarsita in flagrant de
interlopul Herghelegiu Danut, instigat de grupul infractional local prins deasemenea in flagrant
ascunzand probele in dosarul penal 246/P/2015 in scopul de a Favoriza faptuitorul Herghelegiu Danut.
Exista numeroase alte probe ale constituirii intr-un grup infractional organizat intre asa-zisii procurori
Mihaila Paul, Tarlea Florin Cristinel, asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela, interlopul Herghelegiu Danut si alti
politisti, procurori si judecatori locali. Dosarele 14277/231/2015 si 12718/231/2017 avand obiectul
obligarea la tratament medical iarasi nu au nici o logica juridica, deoarece mai mult de faptul ca
expertiza psihiatrica nu poate avea loc datorita refuzului meu de a-mi da consimtamantul, asa-zisii
psihiatri, “organe judiciare” in cardasie cu asa-zise organe de ordine locale au folosit violenta si
amenintarea cu violenta pentru a ma “obliga la tratament medical” pe 27.05.2017 fara drept adica in
mod ilega, fara diagnostic, arestandu-ma de la Scoala “Anghel Saligny” unde urma sa dau 2 examene la
facultatea de drept a Universitatii Ecologice, legandu-ma la psihiatrie si injectandu-ma cu substante
neurotoxice pe baza de fluor si clor adica Haloperidol si Diazepam precum tinandu-ma si in conditii
septice pentru a ma imbolnavi adica cu oameni ai strazii nespalati dintre care unul l-au pus in pat cu
mine in tentativa de a ma imbolnavi, in masura in care conform regulamentului fiecare pat este atribuit
unei singure persoane, exista un numar maxim de paturi per salon, o distanta intre acestea, se intretin
normele de igienta in spital si curatenia s.a.m.d., nici una din acestea nefiind respectate de oligofrenii
criminali care se dau drept medici la Spitalul “Sf. Pantelimon” Focsani, si care conform presei si
constatarilor SRI si ale parchetului general fac experimente ilegal pe “pacienti” adica pe oameni
nevinovati conform evidentei publice ECRIS a dosarelor, adusi cu violenta de “organele judiciare”, alti
psihopati criminali Constituiti intr-un grup infractional organizat, precum a fost adus d-l Grosu Ulise
care a castigat la CEDO cu privire la aceasta stare de fapt dealtfel

4. Privind inadmisibilitatea obligarii la tratament medical deoarece referatul cu propunerea de


obligarea la tratament medical este falsificat in motivarea in fapt si de drept, fiind obligatorie
motivarea in fapt si de drept a actelor organului de urmarire penala in conditiile legii, adica motivarea
sa reprezinte adevarul sau realitatea nu s-o falsifice, de drept cf. art. 5, art. 286 d) si art. 306 din CPP

Declar pe propria raspundere ca referatul cu propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical este


falsificat in motivarea in fapt si de drept deoarece este nemotivat in fapt si de drept cf. art. 286 (2) d) si
art. 306 din CPP, adica nu este indicata in concret nici macar o singura fapta si obiectivat in baza
probatoriului deoarece probatoriul integral imi demonstreaza nevinovatia, asa-zisul procuror
neconsemnand, neadministrand si neobiectivand probatoriul si existenta fizica a faptelor macar nici
macar pentru partea acuzarii, facand abstractie ca oricum partea apararii nu exista in dosar, deoarece
este imposibil de demonstrat faptul ca sunt vinovat in baza unui probatoriu care-mi demonstreaza
nevinovatia, ceea ce am declarat pe propria raspundere fara sa fiu acuzat de Falsul in declaratii si
Inducerea in eroare a organelor judiciare ceea ce face proba veritatii declaratiilor mele si ca “organele
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 268 of 403

judiciare” nu ma acuza de asemenea infractiuni deoarece recunosc tacit ca am dreptate si ca ei


“organele judiciare” sunt infractorii
Procurorul este obligat sa motiveze ordonanta in fapt si de drept cf. art. 286 (2) d) si art. 306 din
CPP in conditiile legii adica conform principiului legalitatii cf. art. 2 din CPP si art. 5 din CPP,
neputandu-se retine ca falsificarea ordonantei poate constitui o motivare in fapt si de drept in
conditiile legii adica cu respectarea principiului legalitatii cf. art. 2 din CPP si respectarea principiului
aflarii adevarului cf. art. 5 din CPP, precum aceste ordonante nu se pot retine ca fiind ordonante
temeinice ci ordonante falsificate fiindca autoritatea justitiei deriva din lege cf. art. 124 din CR “Justitia
se infaptuieste in numele legii”, respectiv se desfasoara conform principiului legalitatii cf. art. 1 (5) din
CR si principiului aflarii adevarului derivat al principiului legalitatii si al dreptului fundamental al
accesului liber la justitie mai precis al dreptului la un proces echitabil, precum este asimilat notiunii de
justitie sau restaurarea ordinii de drept, evident orice ordonanta contrara ordinii de drept fiind nelegala
sau nula de drept sau autoritate de drept, neechitabila, si prin urmare netemeinica
Referatul cu propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical din 12718/231/2017 este falsificat in
motivarea in fapt si de drept, la fel cum a fost falsificat cel din 14277/231/2015, la fel cum au fost
“motivate” mai multe ordonante din dosarele 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016,
la fel cum au fost falsificate propunerile de internarea mea nevoluntara anulata ca nefondata in dosarul
11224/231/2015 in faza de contestatie la Tribunalul Vrancea si cea din 4909/231/2017 falsificata in mod
identic, motiv pentru care asa-zisele organe judiciare care au falsificat aceste acte judiciare sunt
urmarite penal pentru infractiunile de falsurile inscrisuri,implicit infractiunile de serviciu, infractiunile
de impiedicarea infaptuirii justitiei, infractiunile contra libertatii persoanei, infractiunile de coruptie si
alte infractiuni. Motivarea falsificata a propunerii de obligarea la tratament medical din 14277/231/2015
este identica cu motivarea propunerii de obligarea mea la internarea nevoluntara a fost declarata
nefondata in dosarul 11224/231/2015 in faza de contestatie la Tribunalul Vrancea, iar acestea sunt
identice in modul de falsificare cu propunerile din 4909/231/2017 si 12718/231/2017, in fapt grupul
infractional organizat local repetandu-se in modus operandi. Conform principiului de drept ne bis in
idem, nimeni nu poate fi judecat de doua ori pentru aceeasi fapta adica in acest caz acuzatii repetate de
fapte fictive deopotriva neincadrabile in drept penal nici in modul fictiv, acuzatiile fiind absurde si
nereale conform probelor marturii, materiale audio-video a inregistrarilor de sedinta, declaratiilor mele
pe propria raspundere necontrazise de organele judiciare prin acuzatia de Falsul in declaratii si
Inducerea in eroare a organelor judiciare ceeea ce verifica veridicitatea acestor probe, lege, logica
s.a.m.d., precum am descris la sectiunea din partea preliminara a prezentei
Propunerea procurorului de internarea nevoluntara, avand aceeasi motivatie falsa constituind
infractiunile de falsurile in inscrisuri pentru care Mihaila Paul este urmarit penal, a fost declarata
nefondata in dosarul 11224/231/2015 in faza de contestatie la Tribunalul Vrancea, deoarece este
nefondata indiferent ca d-l Habarabor Dorel a apreciat in esenta ca a face plangere penala prealabila
este un act ostil si nu un act civic sau civilizat, incercand sa impace capra cu varza, ceea ce nu este ceea
ce nu e prima data cand aud aceasta aberatie juridica, ci am mai auzit-o de la asa-zisul judecator Virgil
Moise, presedintele completului de judecata a dosarului 1794/300/2010 avand obiectul plangerea
impotriva actelor procurorului care a apreciat in esenta ca infractorii sunt hartuiti de justitie. Prin
aceasta declar faptul de notorietate ca a formula plangere penala prealabila este un drept si nu o
infractiune sau fapta imorala, cf. art. 288-289 din Codul de procedura penala. Prin motivarea unei noi
propuneri prin aceeasi motivare in fapt asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul incalca in flagrant principiului de
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 269 of 403

drept ne bis in idem, nimeni nu poate fi judecat de doua ori pentru aceeasi fapta halucinata de asa-zisul
procuror Mihaila Paul, care m-a acuzat sa n-am discernamant si sunt violent evident fara nici o proba
In concluzie deoarece propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical din 12718/231/2017 este
identic falsificata ca si-n 14277/231/2015, adica cu falsificarea realitatii de fapt fara nici o proba sau
obiectivare probatorie a declaratiilor mincinoase a “organelor judiciare”, cu incalcarea deliberata si
pervaziva a tuturor articolelor de lege relevante precum am demonstrat in prezenta, cu savarsirea
infractiunii de Uzul de fals adica utilizarea de documente “medicale” falsificate in 12718/231/2017 la fel
ca-n 14277/231/2015 precum am demonstrat in prezenta in fapt si de drept,
solicit respingerea propunerii falsificate din 12718/231/2017 pentru acelesi motive in temeiul
principiului aplicarii unitare a dreptului cf. art. 124 din CR, adica inadmisibila in principal si oricum
nefondata in subsidiar, precum solicit denuntarea catre autoritatile penale a inscrisurilor pe care le-am
declarat si demonstrat falsificate conform CPP, sub sanctiunea savarsirii infractiunii de Omisiunea
sesizarii cf. art. 267 din CP
Deoarece inscenarile adica dosarele falsificate 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 au
fost inventate exact in sedintele privind dosarele in care am demonstrat crimele “organelor judiciare”
din 2417/P/2014, este evident ca instigatorul este acelasi asa-zis judecator Dita Mirela si complicii sai
deveniti intre timp autorii propriilor infractiuni pentru care sunt urmariti in mod relevant pentru
Constituirea unui grup infractional organizat. Drept dovada invoc urmatoarele situatii de fapt
Asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela, reclamantul din dosarul 2417/P/2014 a mintit in flagrant ca am
amenintat-o, citez din Ordonanta de renuntarea la urmarirea penala din 10.12.2015 din 2417/P/2015
este falsificata in fapt si de drept astfel "sa fie pusa la zid si impuscata", motiv pentru care am formulat
plangere penala prealabila impotriva sa pentru Falsul in declaratii si Inducerea in eroare a organelor
judiciare deoarece nu exista asemenea citat in probatoriul dosarului 2417/P/2014, in curs de urmarire
deoarece am reintrodus dosarul penal inculpand si “organele judiciare” care au incercat degeaba sa
musamalizeze infractiunile savarsite de Dita Mirela, devenind astfel complici precum si autorii propriilor
infractiuni de falsuri in inscrisuri, infractiuni de coruptie, Constituirea unui grup infractional organizat
si alte infractiuni
Asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul minte in 2417/P/2014 ca m-am prevalat de dreptul de a nu da
declaratii. In realitate fiindca am declarat si cerut sa fie consemnat ca asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul
este urmarit penal, acesta a mintit ca m-am prevalat de dreptul de a nu da declaratii pentru a nu
consemna aceasta. Mai mult, dupa ce i-am trimis in 2417/P/2015 toate plangerile penale prealabile, pe
care am observat ca le-a depus in Volumul II al dosarului 2417/P/2015, recent am observat in dosarul
2220/91/2015 ca Volumul II al dosarului 2417/P/2015 a disparut, precum au disparut si in jur de 40 de
probe din dosarul 2219/91/2015. Aceasta constituie infractiunea de Sustragerea sau distrugerea de
probe ori inscrisuri, cf. art. 275 din Codul Penal, cel mai probabil suspect fiind acelasi asa-zis procuror
Mihaila Paul, cu mentiunea ca asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul este urmarit penal in 8 (opt) dosare penale
privind infractiuni distincte in fapt, pe care le-a savarsit impotriva mea si impotriva mamei mele Raneti
Mariana
Deasemenea mentionez ca am comunicat la dosarul 2417/P/2014 o declaratie pe propria
raspundere prin care am efectuat declaratiile pe care asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul m-a pus in
imposibilitate sa le depun pe 17.09.2015 in dosarul 2417/P/2014, fiindca evident asa-zisul procuror
Mihaila Paul nu vrea sa se cunoasca adevarul, ca a falsificat dosarul 2417/P/2014 la instigarea asa-zisului
judecator Dita Mirela
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 270 of 403

Asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul a avut un episod maniacal, si mintind ca am savarsit infractiunea
de Ultrajul judiciar a emis ordonanta de renuntare la urmarirea penala din 10.12.2015 din 2417/P/2015
in mod nelegal si netemeinic invocand art. 318(1)(2) din CPP raportat la art. 314(1) din CPP, deoarece
pentru invocarea lipsei de interes public, este obligatorie punerea in miscare a actiunii penale cf. art. 7
din CPP mai intai. Aceasta ordonanta mentionez a comunicat-o mamei mele pe data de 16.12.2015
presupun dupa stampila Postei Romane
Declar pe propria raspundere ca nu am fost condamnat pentru savarsirea infractiunii de Ultrajul
judiciar, precum este probata flagrant aceasta realitate prin lipsa hotararii judecatoresti definitive, lipsa
rechizitoriului si lipsa ordonantei de punerea in miscare a actiunii penale care daca nu mi-a fost
comunicata este nula de drept.
Asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul si-a arogat functia de judecator, condamnandu-ma pentru
savarsirea infractiunii de Ultrajul judiciar, demonstrand inca o data ca este schizofrenic si sociopat cu
aspect delirant. Aceasta constituie infractiunea de Uzurparea functiei de procuror. Aceasta nu este o
premiera, precum asa-zisul prim-procuror Tarlea Florin Cristinel a instigat la deturnarea unei plangeri
impotriva actelor procurorului cf. art. 340 din CPP si a judecat-o declarand-o inadmisibila. Plangerea
impotriva actelor procurorului cf. art. 340 din CPP se judeca, evident, de judecator, aceasta constituind
deopotriva Uzurparea functiei de procuror, si Uzurparea de calitati oficiale adica aceea de judecator
In dovedire, justitia se infaptuieste in exclusivitate de judecatori cf. art. 1 din Legea 303/2004 si
art. 2 din Legea 304/2004. Deoarece asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul nu corespunde profesional in mod
evident, acesta a uzurpat functia de procuror prin faptul ca a savarsit infractiunile de falsurile in
inscrisuri, adica prin faptul ca a mintit in flagrant ca am savarsit infractiunea de Ultrajul judiciar.
In dovedire, in dosarul 2417/P/2014 nu s-a pus in miscare actiunea penala, ergo dosarul nu fost
trimis in judecata, ergo nu am fost condamnat pentru savarsirea infractiunii de Ultrajul judiciar, ergo
asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul minte ca am savarsit infractiunea de Ultrajul judiciar.
Nu in ultimul rand, cheltuielile judiciare de 800 de lei sunt deasemenea falsificate in fapt si de
drept fiindca in calitate de suspect in 2417/P/2014 nu suport cheltuielile judiciare ale dosarului
2417/P/2014, respectiv onorariul avocatului din oficiu este necuvenit, deoarece am deschis dosar penal
sotilor avocati Labunt pentru Asistenta si reprezentarea neloiala, deoarece nu mi-au acordat nici un
singur act de asistenta sau reprezentare juridica din data de 05.05.2015 la care au fost delegati in
dosarul 2417/P/2015. In fapt nu exista nici o expertiza contabila, barem sau lege care sa stabileasca in ce
consta suma de 800 de lei, cu exceptia onorariului necuvenit de 200 de lei. In dovedire de drept,
deoarece am avut calitatea de suspect in 2417/P/2014, si cf. art. 275 (3) si art. 276 (1) din CPP in care se
face referire la inculpat nu la suspect, nu se pot retine cheltuieli judiciare in sarcina suspectului
Mentionez ca am depus in copie plangerile penale prealabile impotriva inculpatului Mihaila Paul
in dosarul 2417/P/2014 care fusese conexat la dosarul 11224/231/2015, pe care completul de judecata
le poate consulta constatand ca cele declarate de mine sunt adevarate cu privire la caracterul
infractional al activitatii asa-zisului procuror Mihaila Paul. Plangerile penale prealabile relevante adica in
legatura cu dosarul 2417/P/2015, 11224/231/2015 si 14277/231/2015 sunt indice #4, #5 si #6, asa-zisul
procuror Mihaila Paul fiind urmarit penal in tot atatea dosare penale pentru fapte penale distincte in
fapt dar identice de drept, adica asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul este recidivist, cu "binecuvantarea" unor
asa-zisi procurori din Parchetul de pe langa Curtea de Apel Galati care au avut impresia ca pot
musamaliza vreodata un dosar penal fata de mine, si au devenit inculpati - complici ai asa-zisului
procuror Mihaila Paul in aceleasi dosare in care continua urmarirea penala. In a 6-a plangere penala
prealabila mentionez, am denuntat falsificarea mandatului de aducere din 10.09.2015 din
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 271 of 403

10547/231/2015 in cardasie cu asa-zisul judecator Dinu Murgulet Ana care s-ar fi putut disculpa
spunand ca a fost inselata de asa-zisul Mihaila Paul cu probe inscrisuri ticluite mincinos si relatari
neconforme realitatii, insa a incalcat in flagrant art. 184 (1) din CPP insinuand ca pot fi expertizat
psihiatric pentru presupusa fapta de Ultrajul judiciar, demonstrand ca in realitate Dinu Murgulet Ana
este in cardasie cu asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul si asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela, singurii ceilalti
criminali obsedati sa ma discrediteze folosind psihiatria ca o arma impotriva mea, in fapt obsesia
originala provenind de la asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela care si-a instigat colegii de crima organizata in
aceasta privinta, demonstrand prin aceasta ca s-au constituit intr-un grup infractional organizat.
In dovedirea instigarii acestor grave abuzuri de catre asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela, in dosarul
15730/231/2014 avand obiectul punerea mea sub interdictie, asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela fara a
depune nici o proba, a declarat in esenta ca cetatenii care-si exercita dreptul fundamental al accesului la
justitie sunt alienati mintal, fapt pe care l-am retinut drept proba de alienare a asa-zisului judecator Dita
Mirela care a jurat sa respecte Constitutia si legile, sa apere drepturile persoanelor, cf. art. 34 din Legea
303/2004, apoi dupa ce a adus aceasta grava atingere imaginii profesionale si prestigiului justitiei a
renuntat la judecata demonstrand rea-credinta prin introducerea unei actiuni vadit netemeinice
impotriva mea.
In dovedire, din referatul cu propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical falsificata in mod
identic in dosarele 14277/231/2015 si 12718/231/2017 adica fiind acuzat de fapte fictive si ca in mod
fals ca sunt lipsit de discernamant, reiese deasemenea ca tot asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela este cel care
l-a instigat pe asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul la savarsirea abuzurilor legate de procedura in legatura cu
psihiatria, asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul efectuand chiar un apel telefonic mamei mele in primavara
sau vara anului 2015, intreband-o daca sunt nebun. Din formularea de actiuni identice, fiind acuzat de 4
ori si de 3 ori cu incalcarea autoritatii de lucru judecat ca n-am discernamant, reiese ca asa-zisul
procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian deasemenea a fost instigat de Dita Mirela
Asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul este deasemenea urmarit penal pentru complicitatea flagranta la
faptele penale savarsite de asa-zisii medici legisti Dicu Serban Dan si Ionescu Natalia de la SML Vrancea
care au savarsit in flagrant Favorizarea faptuitorului, interlopul Herghelegiu Danut care a savarsit in
flagrant tentativa de Omor calificat si Vatamarea corporala pe data de 05.12.2014 impotriva mea,
probat flagrant prin toate procedeele probatorii posibile, si prin faptul ca nu mi-au dat trimitere la
specialitatile medicale corespunzatoare traumei cranio-cerebrale suferite in urma atacului interlopului
Herghelegiu Danut impotriva mea pe data de 05.12.2015, apoi dupa ce suferinta m-a condus la doctori
de la care am obtinut diagnostice si probe materiale investigatii paraclinice, asa-zisii medici legisti Dicu
Serban Dan si Ionescu Natalia mai intai m-au mintit ca nu pot intocmi un nou certificat medico-legal,
apoi la adresa efectuata de d-na avocat Dodoiu Corina catre SML Vrancea, au raspuns in batjocura cu o
completare falsificata a certificatului medico-legal original in care au declarat ca diagnosticele medicale
a doi neurologi, doi neurochirurgi, probele materiale investigatii paraclinice si literatura de specialitate
medicala si medico-legala, sunt toate false. Relevanta acestei relatari este faptul ca asa-zisul medic legist
Lucasievici Silviu care a falsificat expertizele medico-legale psihiatrice nu a actionat in interes ilicit
propriu, ci a falsificat acte juridice avand o intelegere prealabila ilicita cu asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul
si grupul infractional organizat din care face parte si care ulterior a falsificat dosarele 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016, grup infractional organizat care in schimbul falsificarii acestor documente,
sa musamalizeze dosarul 1863/P/2015 (829/P/2015) avand inculpati pe Dicu Serban Dan si Ionescu
Natalia, dosar pe care intr-adevar l-a musamalizat Mihaila Paul pentru care este urmarit penal impreuna
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 272 of 403

cu inculpatii dosarului 1863/P/2015 (829/P/2015) care au savarsit Falsul in declaratii in flagrant, mintind
ca prin refuzul de a-si face datoria si-au facut datoria. Mentionez si aspectul relevant al faptului ca pe
data de 09.12.2015 in dosarul 2219/231/2015 avand obiectul plangerea impotriva actelor procurorului
cf. art. 340, impotriva ordonantei de clasare ilegale si netemeinice din 1863/P/2015 (829/P/2015), am
denuntat d-nei Rodica Neagu presedintele completului de judecata a dosarului 2219/231/2015 faptul ca
din dosar lipsesc aproximativ 40 (patru zeci) de probe, fapt vadit evident mie deoarece jumatate din
probele anexate la dosar sunt poze, ori am inventariat existenta acestor probe prin OPIS-ul de la sfarsitul
petitiei principale precum se uziteaza, si acest inventar se poate efectua verificand si posta electronica
prin care am inaintat probatoriul in conditiile legii la Tribunalul Vrancea, precum am si efectuat o cerere
de informare in acest sens Tribunalului Vrancea

Nu in ultimul rand precizez ca am anexat aproape la toate aceste dosare mentionate,


investigatia mea adica obiectivarea infractiunilor savarsite de “organele judiciare” sub formatul unei
plangeri penale prealabile care dealtfel poate fi copiata intr-un rechizitoriu si trimisa direct in judecata
pentru condamnarea acestora fiindca am demonstrat mai presus de orice dubii rezonabile atrocitatile
savarsite de acesti criminali, inscrisuri pe care organele judiciare din 12718/231/2017 cel putin sunt
obligate sa le ia in considerare si dupa caz sa sesizeze la randul lor autoritatile penale sub sanctiunea
complicitatii si autoratul infractiunii de Omisiunea sesizarii cf. art. 267 din CPP

5. Privind inadmisibilitatea obligarii la tratament medical deoarece toate actele “medicale”,


“medico-legale” si altele sunt vadit falsificate in fapt si de drept, fiind ascunse de mine prin
necomunicare special pentru a mi se ingradi dreptul la aparare cf. art. 6 (3) din CEDO
In drept, raportul medico-legal psihiatric emis de Comisia de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica
din cadrul Serviciului de Medicina Legala Vrancea nr. 970/A1-P/232 din presupusa data de 17.09.2015
este falsificat in flagrant deoarece anulandu-se internarea mea nevoluntara in vederea efectuarii
expertizei medico-legale psihiatrice in dosarul 11224/231/2015 in faza de contestatie la Tribunalul
Vrancea, evident expertiza nu a fost efectuata, si nu ar fi putut fi efectuata indiferent deoarece nu mi-
am dat niciodata consimtamantul si nu l-as fi dat niciodata, avand acest drept cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP si
art. 11 din Legea 487/2002, si astfel este dovedit mai presus de orice dubii ca diagnosticul reprezentat in
certificatul medico-legal este falsificat, deoarece de drept cf. art. 10, 11 si 17 din Legea 487/2002 Legea
sanatatii mintale si a protectiei persoanelor cu tulburari psihice, se statueaza ca “Evaluarea sanatatii
mintale se efectueaza, prin examinare directa a persoanei in cauza...”, respectiv “Evaluarea sanatatii
mintale se face cu consimtamantul liber, informat si documentat al persoanei...”, coroborat cu art. 184
(3) din CPP
Mai mult, raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica din 14277/231/2015 contine un
diagnostic prezumtiv deoarece este exprimat prin, citez "cel mai probabil" precum poate constata
completul de judecata la fila 103 din dosarul 14277/231/2015 reprezentand ultima fila din raportul de
expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232 din presupusa data de 17.09.2015, evident fiind ca
nu pot fi obligat la tratament medical in baza unui diagnostic prezumtiv care nici n-are ce cauta intr-un
raport de expertiza medico-legal, deoarece conform
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 273 of 403

Norme metodologice privind activitatea medicului legist in calitate de expert numit de organele
judiciare la solicitarea partilor
Art. 3. În activitatea profesională pe care o desfășoară, în calitate de consilier al părților, expertul
recomandat trebuie să depună toate diligențele necesare în vederea asigurării unei probațiuni
judicire pe baze științifice, cu respectarea metodologiei medico-legale precum și a normelor
deontologice.

In fapt, actele “medicale”, “medico-legale” si altele emise de SML Vrancea, Sectia de psihiatrie a
Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon” nu sunt stiintifice deoarece nu au fost intocmite pe baza stiintifice, ci pe
minciunile asa-zisilor medici psihiatri pentru grupul infractional organizat constituit din “organele
judiciare” care au falsificat dosarele 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016, minciuni
constituind infractiunile de falsurile in inscrisuri, implicit infractiunile de serviciu, infractiunile de
impiedicarea infaptuirii justitiei, infractiunile contra libertatii persoanei, infractiunile de coruptie si
alte infractiuni, declaratii vadit contradictorii prin care asa-zisii medici psihiatri s-au incriminat singuri
penal, cum ar fi de exemplu retinerea ca n-am discernamant, simultan cu retinerile ca am studii
superioare, gandire rapida, cultura generala s.a.m.d., prin care asa-zisii medici psihiatri au demonstrat ca
sunt schizofrenici deoarece au pierdut vadit orice contact cu realitatea juridica, profesionala si socioala,
reprezentand un pericol nu doar pentru public ci si pentru propria persoana incriminandu-se penal
singuri in flagrant, si sociopati sau cu tulburare antisociala de personalitate, fiindca incalca in mod
pervaziv legea si drepturile persoanelor.
In dovedirea celor declarate invoc literatura de specialitate la sfarsitul acestui punct

Prin urmare si in scopul cerintelor de a gasi propunerea de obligarea la tratament medical


inadmisibila, nelegala, neconstitutionala si netemeinica va rog sa constatati ca:
1. raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica din 06.04.2017 ce nu mi s-a comunicat in
mod ilegal cf. art. 94 (2)(8) din CPP si art. 58 din Legea 487/2002 dar care exista conform ordonantei
falsificate de renuntarea la urmarirea penala din 01.08.2017, cu siguranta nemotivat in conditiile legii
sau vadit falsificat deoarece expertiza psihiatrica se poate realiza doar prin interviu cf. art. 10 din Legea
487/2002 ceea ce n-a avut loc fiindca am refuzat cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP si art. 11 din Legea 487/2002, ori
de fata nici macar n-a fost un reprezentant legal fiind incalcata legea sub toate aspectele pe data de
06.04.2017, inclusiv motivarea falsificata a mandatului de aducere din 05.04.2017 din 4791/231/2017
deoarece cf. art. 184 (4) din CPP doar daca suspectul sau inculpatul consimte apoi se sustrage examinarii
poate fi adus cu forta, altfel examinarea este evident imposibila prin refuzul de a sustine interviul care
oricum este inutil indicand ca psihiatria este o sarlatanie nu o stiinta, deoarece in special infractorii sunt
sociopati, iar caracteristica principala a sociopatilor este mitomania, adica acestia mint la interviu si prin
urmare examinarea psihiatrica nu are nici o valoare stiintifica sau judiciara, cu atat mai mult cu cat este
evident din aceasta intampinare ca “psihiatrii” sunt infractori sau sociopati criminali si falsifica
rapoartele psihiatrice;
constituie o incalcare a art. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din
Protocolul 12 al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale prin tracasarea mea psihologica implicit
psihosomatica si santajarea mea prin folosirea psihiatriei ca arma de represiune nedreapta si
amenintarea cu lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal, supunerea la rele tratamente si vatamarea
corporala prin otravirea cu neurotoxine, in realitate neexistand tratamente psihiatrice, fluorul si clorul
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 274 of 403

din asa-zisele medicamente fiind neurotoxine nu tratamente. Grupul infractional organizat alcatuit din
mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici legisti” si altii care se comporta
ca niste gangsteri si tortionari in relatie cu mafia magistratilor, ma discrimineaza si-mi ingradesc
libertatea de constiinta chiar pe motivul ca sunt un cetatean onest credincios ordinii de drept ce
incomodeaza activitatea criminala a “magistratilor” ce ma persecuta abuzand de functia publica
utilizand sistemul judiciar, fortele de ordine si psihiatria ca arme de represiune nedreapta
2. raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica 1447/A1-P/333/09.12.2016 ce nu mi s-a
comunicat in mod ilegal cf. art. 94 (2)(8) din CPP si art. 58 din Legea 487/2002, data la care sau in
prealabil pentru acest raport nu m-am dus personal si nici n-am fost detinut ilegal si adus cu forta ca pe
data de 17.09.2017 prin mandatul falsificat de “judecatorul” Dinu Murgulet Ana din 10.09.2015 din
10547/231/2015 sau pe data de 06.04.2017 prin mandatul falsificat de acelasi “judecator” Dinu
Murgulet Ana din 05.04.2017 din 4791/231/2017 sub pretextul ilegal al unei expertize psihiatrice
imposibil de realizat fara acordul meu, pentru santajarea mea, supunerea mea la rele tratamente prin
privarea in mod ilegal de libertate si tracasare, dar si pentru falsificarea raportului de expertiza medico-
legala psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232 din presupusa data de 17.09.2015 care in realitate a fost falsificat in
perioada 30.10.2015-03.12.2015 dupa ce clica mafiota ce a falsificat dosarul 2417/P/2014 a pierdut la
contestatie actiunea de internarea mea nevoluntara 11224/231/2015. In concluzie la fel, deoarece
examinarea psihiatrica se desfasoara doar prin interviu cf. art. 10 din Legea 487/2002 si pentru raportul
de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica 1447/A1-P/333/09.12.2016 nici macar n-am fost prezent, este
dovedit mai presus de orice dubii rezonabile ca raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica 1447/A1-
P/333/09.12.2016 este falsificat precum am demonstrat ca este raportul de expertiza medico-legala
psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232 in dosarul 14277/231/2015 avand obiectul obligarea la tratament medical
respins ca inadmisibil pentru aceleasi motive de nelegalitate si netemeinicie pentru care invoc
inadmisibilitatea actiunii 12718/231/2017;
constituie o incalcare a art. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din
Protocolul 12 al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale prin tracasarea mea psihologica implicit
psihosomatica si santajarea mea prin folosirea psihiatriei ca arma de represiune nedreapta si
amenintarea cu lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal, supunerea la rele tratamente si vatamarea
corporala prin otravirea cu neurotoxine, in realitate neexistand tratamente psihiatrice, fluorul si clorul
din asa-zisele medicamente fiind neurotoxine nu tratamente. Grupul infractional organizat alcatuit din
mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici legisti” si altii care se comporta
ca niste gangsteri si tortionari in relatie cu mafia magistratilor, ma discrimineaza si-mi ingradesc
libertatea de constiinta chiar pe motivul ca sunt un cetatean onest credincios ordinii de drept ce
incomodeaza activitatea criminala a “magistratilor” ce ma persecuta abuzand de functia publica
utilizand sistemul judiciar, fortele de ordine si psihiatria ca arme de represiune nedreapta
3. fisa de externare din 08.06.2017 a Sectiei de psihiatrie a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon”
continand doua diagnostice vadit falsificate cum ca studentia la facultatea de drepet e “psihoza acuta
predominant deliranta “ si “paranoia premorbida”, deoarece nu am fost expertizat psihiatric ci am fost
detinut pe 27.05.2017 de la examenele la facultatea de drept de la centrul Focsani al Universitatii
Ecologice de la Scoala generala “Anghel Saligny” Focsani unde sunt student in anul I de 3 securisti in civil,
am fost incarcerat si legat la psihiatrie fara justificare si fara un diagnostic otravit prin injectare cu
neurotoxine pe baza de fluor si clor adica Haloperidol, Invega respectiv Diazepam si Prazolex. Prospectul
Invega precizez infatiseaza sute de efecte negative permanente documentate stiintific inclusiv moartea
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 275 of 403

si nici un efect pozitiv documentat stiintific. Pe durata internarii am fost abuzat fizic si Vatamat corporal
si amenintat de asa-zisul psihiatru curant Barbarosie ca daca refuz sa consimt sa fiu “expertizat” si
“tratat” voi fi obligat la fel prin abuz fizic si Vatamare corporala. Am fost obligat astfel prin amenintare
la un test de urina care a demonstrat ca nu ma droghez ci psihiatrii si organele judiciare halucineaza ca
ma droghez din moment ce au dispus un asemenea test in special fiindca nici macar nu m-a acuzat
cineva ca ma droghez, si mi s-au prelevat impotriva vointei mele 3 fiole de sange fara sa reiasa iarasi nici
o problema cum ca ma droghez si prin urmare nici un motiv pentru acest test decat sa fiu Vatamat
corporal precum atesta si intentia asa-zisului psihiatru curant sa ma oblige sa fiu iradiat cu un test CT
care nu este pentru creier ci pentru oasele capului si iradiaza de sute de ori mai mult ca o analiza
normala cu raze X. La asa-zisele examene psihologice am constatat aceleasi intrebari la care am raspuns
la examinarile pentru medicina muncii de mai multe ori sau la recrutare si incorporare in armata, la care
am raspuns in mod identic si fiindca nu am fost diagnosticat de medicina muncii sau de medicina
armatei cu aceleasi diagnostice atunci este dovedit mai presus de orice dubii rezonabile ca fisa de
externare din 08.06.2017 a Sectiei de psihiatrie a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon” este falsificata precum
demonstrez prin proba 5 reprezentand pledoaria mea detaliata privind modul in care a fost falsificata
aceasta mai precis prin incalcarea legii si falsificarea in mod generic a realitatii de fapt adica printr-un
delir de termeni psihiatrici aruncati la intamplare fara nici o acoperire in fapte reale cu care ar fi trebui
sa se coreleze aceste inferente pentru a fi valide, motiv pentru care testele se si contrazic tocmai fiindca
sunt fara acoperire in realitatea de fapt si emise de mincinosi diferiti, precum aceste minciuni sunt mai
ales in contradictie cu legea si logica juridica pe care trebuie sa se intameieze toate actele juridice.
Prospectul Invega precizez infatiseaza sute de efecte negative permanente documentate stiintific
inclusiv moartea si nici un efect pozitiv documentat stiintific. Invega este de notorietate conform
prospectului o neurotoxina promovata de o companie americana ca tratament pentru schizofrenie,
companie condamnata repetat pentru comercializarea de otravuri drept medicamente conform
evidentei publice din enciclopedia de pe internet wikipedia.com care referentiaza din presa si evidenta
publica a sistemului judiciar SUA numeroase procese pierdute de aceasta companie, precum si realitatea
puternicei otravuri Invega care provoaca dizabilitati permanente de invatare si memorare ceea ce se
coreleaza cu actul criminal de a ma aresta ilegal de la examenele la facultatea de drept in baza unor
proceduri vadit ilegale deci falsificate precum demonstrez pe scurt prin realitatea de drept ca doar fata
de suspectii si acuzatii de omor sau pruncucidere se poate dispune expertiza psihiatrica cf. art. 184 (1)
din CPP si chiar si atunci aceasta fiind posibila doar cu consimtamantul acestora, altfel cf. art. 4 (2) din
CPP orice indoiala a procurorului se interpreteaza in favoarea suspectului sau inculpatului, existand
numeroase alte moduri de a demonstra gravele abuzuri savarsite de ceea ce se poate numi mafia
magistratilor si tortionarii lor “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici” s.a.m.d., demonstratii pe care le-am
anexat la dosarele penale 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 sub forma unei plangeri penale
prealabile impotriva asa-ziselor organe judiciare din dosar, reclamanti si alti complici si instigatori
precum in cazul de notorietate d-l Berbeceanu si-a incriminat si ulterior condamnat acuzatorii mincinosi.
Evident nici unul din diagnostice nu e schizofrenia ca sa fiu “tratat” pentru schizofrenie cu otrava
neurotoxica pe baza de fluor Invega deci iarasi aceasta este o dovada a falsificarii acestui document,
precum insusi faptul ca declararea ca studentia la facultatea de drept e “psihoza acuta predominant
deliranta” si “paranoia premorbida” este vadit o aberatie a regimului totalitar impus de mafia
magistratilor in Romania, dat fiind ca n-am fost intrebat nimic din dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si
4329/P/2016 sau in legatura cu acestea ci am fost arestat de la examenele la facultatea de drept legat si
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 276 of 403

otravit precum s-a retinut in fisa de externare pe care o retin drept proba inscris a acestei stari de fapt
impreuna cu procesul verbal al securistilor in civil care m-au arestat de la Scoala generala “Anghel
Saligny” Focsani unde urma sa sustin examenele la centrul Universitatii Ecologice, iar continutul fisei
falsificate de externare insusi n-are nici o legatura cu raspunsurile mele la testele psihologice, precum
nici macar la audierea contrafacuta a Comisiei care trebuia sa ma puna in libertate conform legii si
evidentelor nu s-a interesat de vadita mea nevinovatie ci membrii acesteia au mintit acuzandu-ma ca
“sunt pericol public” fara nici o dovada sau logica, incalcandu-mi prezumtia de nevinovatie cf. art. 6 (2)
din CEDO, si ca sa-si justifice crimele, precum pentru musamalizarea minciunilor lor nu mi-au comunicat
procesul verbal intocmit;
constituie o incalcare a art. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din
Protocolul 12 al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale prin tracasarea mea psihologica implicit
psihosomatica si santajarea mea prin folosirea psihiatriei ca arma de represiune nedreapta si
amenintarea cu lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal, supunerea la rele tratamente si vatamarea
corporala prin otravirea cu neurotoxine, in realitate neexistand tratamente psihiatrice, fluorul si clorul
din asa-zisele medicamente fiind neurotoxine nu tratamente. Grupul infractional organizat alcatuit din
mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici legisti” si altii care se comporta
ca niste gangsteri si tortionari in relatie cu mafia magistratilor, ma discrimineaza si-mi ingradesc
libertatea de constiinta chiar pe motivul ca sunt un cetatean onest credincios ordinii de drept ce
incomodeaza activitatea criminala a “magistratilor” ce ma persecuta abuzand de functia publica
utilizand sistemul judiciar, fortele de ordine si psihiatria ca arme de represiune nedreapta
4. certificatul medico-legal psihiatric din 08.06.2017, ce nu mi s-a comunicat in mod ilegal cf.
art. 94 (2)(8) din CPP si art. 58 din Legea 487/2002 pentru a ma impiedica sa le denunt penal, la comisia
de malpraxis si civil, disciplinar la colegiul medicilor, si sa le contest administrativ la institutul de
medicina legala superior - conform principiului contradictorialitatii orice probe care nu sunt supuse
dezbaterilor in contradictoriu deasemenea nu sunt admisibile, in materie penala cf. art. 349 si art. 351
din CPP. In fapt, am fost dus cu forta iarasi pentru a treia oara (prima oara pe 17.09.2015 si a doua oara
pe 06.04.2017) la Comisia de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica din cadrul SML Vrancea pe data de
08.06.2017 dupa ce am fost drogat cu neurotoxinele Haloperidol, Diazepam, Invega si Prazolex 12 zile la
rand motiv pentru care in ultimul examen psihologic am performat doar 98 IQ ceea ce atesta Vatamarea
mea corporala deoarece in conditii normale pot performa in testele de inteligenta 110-120 IQ superficial
si peste 140 concentrat precum am performat la recrutare si incorporare la armata, in diverse teste ale
medicinei muncii sau de pe internet, putand prezenta probe inscrisuri in acest sens la cerere. Prospectul
Invega precizez infatiseaza sute de efecte negative permanente documentate stiintific inclusiv moartea
si nici un efect pozitiv documentat stiintific. La aceasta falsa examinare fara sa ma intrebe nimic din
dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 asa-zisul psihiatru Lucasievici Silviu a delirat ca “e
clar” si m-au trimis inapoi la Sectia de psihiatrie a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon”;
constituie o incalcare a art. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din
Protocolul 12 al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale prin tracasarea mea psihologica implicit
psihosomatica si santajarea mea prin folosirea psihiatriei ca arma de represiune nedreapta si
amenintarea cu lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal, supunerea la rele tratamente si vatamarea
corporala prin otravirea cu neurotoxine, in realitate neexistand tratamente psihiatrice, fluorul si clorul
din asa-zisele medicamente fiind neurotoxine nu tratamente. Grupul infractional organizat alcatuit din
mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici legisti” si altii care se comporta
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 277 of 403

ca niste gangsteri si tortionari in relatie cu mafia magistratilor, ma discrimineaza si-mi ingradesc


libertatea de constiinta chiar pe motivul ca sunt un cetatean onest credincios ordinii de drept ce
incomodeaza activitatea criminala a “magistratilor” ce ma persecuta abuzand de functia publica
utilizand sistemul judiciar, fortele de ordine si psihiatria ca arme de represiune nedreapta
5. orice acte “medicale” din dosarele in atentia instantei necomunicate mie in mod ilegal cf.
art. 94 (2)(8) din CPP si art. 58 din Legea 487/2002 special pentru a ma impiedica sa le denunt penal, la
comisia de malpraxis si civil, disciplinar la colegiul medicilor, si sa le contest administrativ la institutul de
medicina legala superior - conform principiului contradictorialitatii orice probe care nu sunt supuse
dezbaterilor in contradictoriu deasemenea nu sunt admisibile, in materie penala cf. art. 349 si art. 351
din CPP. Deoarece orice acte medicale din aceste dosare precum am demonstrat in fapt si de drept nu
sunt legale, si nu sunt bazate pe fapte prin urmare nu pot fi temeinice precum nu pot exista efecte fara
cauze, ceea ce totodata determina invaliditatea actului juridic in sine pentru nerespectarea logicii
juridice, in concluzie acestea nu pot fi decat nule de drept cf. art. 280 si art. 282 din CPP inainte sa fie si
inadmisibile de drept cf. art. 349 si 351 din CPP;
constituie o incalcare a art. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14 si 17 din CEDO si a art. 1 din
Protocolul 12 al CEDO si a libertatilor fundamentale prin tracasarea mea psihologica implicit
psihosomatica si santajarea mea prin folosirea psihiatriei ca arma de represiune nedreapta si
amenintarea cu lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal, supunerea la rele tratamente si vatamarea
corporala prin otravirea cu neurotoxine, in realitate neexistand tratamente psihiatrice, fluorul si clorul
din asa-zisele medicamente fiind neurotoxine nu tratamente. Grupul infractional organizat alcatuit din
mafia magistratilor si asimilati cum ar fi “politisti”, “jandarmi”, “medici legisti” si altii care se comporta
ca niste gangsteri si tortionari in relatie cu mafia magistratilor, ma discrimineaza si-mi ingradesc
libertatea de constiinta chiar pe motivul ca sunt un cetatean onest credincios ordinii de drept ce
incomodeaza activitatea criminala a “magistratilor” ce ma persecuta abuzand de functia publica
utilizand sistemul judiciar, fortele de ordine si psihiatria ca arme de represiune nedreapta

In dovedirea nulitatii actelor “medicale”, “psihiatrice” si orice alte asemenea acte, invoc legea
care statueaza ca toate actele juridice emise cu nerespectarea legii sunt lovite de nulitate conform

Cod de procedura penala


Art. 280 - Efectele nulitatii
(1) Incalcarea dispozitiilor legale care reglementeaza desfasurarea procesului penal atrage nulitatea
actului in conditiile prevazute expres de prezentul cod.

Cod de procedura penala


Art. 282 - Nulitatile relative
(1) Incalcarea oricaror dispozitii legale in afara celor prevazute la art. 281 determina nulitatea actului
atunci cand prin nerespectarea cerintei legale s-a adus o vatamare drepturilor partilor ori ale subiectilor
procesuali principali, care nu poate fi inlaturata altfel decat prin desfiintarea actului

Art. 17 din Legea 487/2002 republicata 2012, legea sanatatii mintale si a protectiei persoanelor cu
tulburari psihice
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 278 of 403

Evaluarea sanatatii mintale in cadrul expertizei medico-legale psihiatrice se face in conformitate cu


prevederile legale in vigoare.

In fapt, rapoartele de expertiza medico-legale sunt falsificate in flagrant precum le-am denuntat
deoarece expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica nu a avut loc vreodata, mai intai fiind anulata propunerea
de internarea mea nevoluntara in scopul efectuarii expertizei medico-legale psihiatrice in dosarul
11224/231/2015 in faza de contestatie la Tribunalul Vrancea, apoi falsificandu-se un raport in lipsa mea
in 2015 in dosarul 2417/P/2014 si alt raport in lipsa mea in 2017 conform ordonantei falsificate de
renuntarea la urmarirea penala din 01.08.2017 din 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016, si
probabil al treilea raport pe 08.06.2017 care deasemenea s-a desfasurat fara concursul meu deoarece
am refuzat sa fiu expertizat si n-a avut loc nici un interviu, precum n-a avut loc nici o expertiza evident
cand am fost arestat ilegal si netemeinic de la examenele la facultatea de drept a Universitatii Ecologice
ce urma sa le sustin la Scoala generala “Anghel Saligny” de 3 securisti in civil, dupa care am fost legat la
psihiatrie de un pat nejustificat si injectat cu neurotoxine pe baza de fluor si clor pentru a ma face “o
leguma” precum am fost amenintat de apropiatii acestui grup infractional organizat precum am fost
avertizat de prieteni, toate acestea confirmandu-mi ca atrocitatile din Vrancea continua nestingherite in
stil comunist cu protectie de la Bucuresti adica de la guvern in acelasi stil comunist ca si acum 70 de ani.
Mai mult, rapoartele de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrice si celelalte asa-zise acte medicale sunt
falsificate in flagrant in drept, incalcandu-se art. 183(1)(3) din CPP, art. 10, 11, 17 din Legea 487/2002,
adica faptul ca nu pot fi expertizat medico-legal psihiatric decat daca sunt suspect, inculpat sau
condamnat pentru infractiunile de omorul sau pruncuciderea, si este obligatoriu consimtamantul meu
liber dat in scris.
In dovedire invoc legea:

Codul de procedura penala


Art. 184 - Expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica
(1) In cazul infractiunilor comise de minorii cu varsta intre 14 si 16 ani, in cazul uciderii sau vatamarii
copilului nou-nascut ori a fatului de catre mama, precum SI (nu “sau”) atunci cand organul de urmarire
penala sau instanta are o indoiala asupra discernamantului suspectului ori inculpatului in momentul
savarsirii infractiunii ce face obiectul acuzatiei, se dispune efectuarea unei expertize medico-legale
psihiatrice, stabilindu-se totodata termenul de prezentare in vederea examinarii.
(3) Expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica se efectueaza dupa obtinerea consimtamantului scris al
persoanei ce urmeaza a fi supusa expertizei, exprimat, in prezenta unui avocat ales sau din oficiu, in fata
organului judiciar, iar in cazul minorului, si in prezenta ocrotitorului legal.

Art. 10 din Legea 487/2002 legea sanatatii mintale si a protectiei persoanelor cu tulburari psihice
(1) Evaluarea sanatatii mintale se efectueaza, prin examinare directa a persoanei in cauza, numai de
catre medicul psihiatru.
(2) Evaluarea se va realiza in institutii de sanatate mintala, autorizate si acreditate conform legii.

In fapt, conform literaturii de specialitate anexate la dosarul 11224/231/2015 pe care l-am


solicitat a fi adus in 12718/231/2017, Serviciile de medicina legala nu sunt autorizate sa emita rapoarte
de expertiza medico-legale in cauze penale. Aceasta mi-a fost confirmat si de avocatii cu care am stat de
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 279 of 403

vorba in rastimpul in care am fost Lipsit de libertate in mod ilegal intre orele 9:30 A.M. si 11:00 A.M. in
incinta Judecatoriei Focsani la ordinul ilicit al asa-zisului judecator Badiu Mandica

Art. 11 din Legea 487/2002 legea sanatatii mintale si a protectiei persoanelor cu tulburari psihice
Evaluarea sanatatii mintale se face cu consimtamantul liber, informat si documentat al persoanei, cu
exceptia situatiilor specifice, stabilite de lege, cand persoana evaluata are dificultati in a aprecia
implicatiile unei decizii asupra ei insesi, situatii in care persoana evaluata trebuie sa beneficieze de
asistenta reprezentantului legal sau conventional.

Art. 13 din Legea 487/2002 legea sanatatii mintale si a protectiei persoanelor cu tulburari psihice
(1) Obiectivul evaluarii este stabilirea diagnosticului.

In concluzie, expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica (“Prima EMLP” conform literaturii de


specialitate medico-legala anexate) nu putea fi indeplinita legal deoarece:
- cf. art. 184 (1) din CPP, nu sunt suspect pentru omor sau pruncucidere, SI (nu “sau”) indoiala si
propunerea procurorului este nelegala, netemeinica adica mincinoasa si neprobata pe deasupra,
precum si de rea-credinta criminala. Cf. art. 4 (2) din CPP indoiala procurorului se interpreteaza in
favoarea suspectului sau acuzatului iar art. 184 (1) din CPP deroga de la art. 4 (2) din CPP motiv pentru
care acuzarea mea de omor sau pruncucidere este obligatorie pentru expertizarea mea psihiatrica,
oricum imposibila fara acordul meu
- cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP si art. 10 din Legea 487/2002, nu mi-am dat consimtamantul pentru a-
mi fi pusa la indoiala sanatatea mintala si in consecinta evaluata, evident fiind constient ca grupul
infractional organizat are nevoie de aceasta conditie pentru a falsifica legalitatea macar a expertizarii,
neputand musamaliza insa faptul ca falsifica actele “medicale” in fond precum am demonstrat in
prezenta
- lipseste avizul Comisiei superioare de medicina legala, conform literaturii de specialitate
medico-legala acesta fiind obligatoriu
- lipseste motivarea ordonantei procurorului in fapt si de drept in conditiile legii neputand
constitui o motivare in fapt in conditiile legii infractiunile de falsurile in inscrisuri prin care asa-zisul
procuror Lupu Mihai Cristian a falsificat motivarea propunerii de obligarea la tratament medical, pentru
ca nu reprezinta adevarul. Procurorul este obligat a motiva in fapt si de drept ordonanta cf. art. 5, art.
286 d) din CPP, art. 306 din CPP. Aceasta constituie abatere disciplinara grava cf. art. 9 a)e)f)n)r)s)t) si
art. 99^1 (1) din Legea 303/2004 privind statutul magistratilor.

In dosarul 2417/P/2014 asa-zisii medici legisti stiind ca nu pot falsifica aparentele legalitatii si
temeiniciei certificatului medico-legal decat daca-mi dau consimtamantul sa-mi fie pusa la indoiala
sanatatea mintala si sa fiu expertizat medico-legal, s-au constituit intr-un grup infractional organizat cu
asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul care pe data de 17.09.2015 a pus in executare un mandat falsificat din
10.09.2015 din 10547/231/2015, si dupa ce m-a Lipsit de libertate in mod ilegal si Supus la rele
tratamente prin retinerea mea ilegala, privarea de odihna si hrana, supunerea la comportament
irational timp de 7 (sapte) ore, a falsificat alt mandat de aducere numit “de la ora 10:16 din
2417/P/2015”, cu care m-a dus cu mascatii la Comisia de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica, ceea ce nu
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 280 of 403

le-a folosit la nimic, deoarece tot nu mi-am dat consimtamantul scris cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP, ceea ce a
determinat urmatoarea situatie:
pe data de 22.09.2015 in baza unor acte juridice falsificate de asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici
Silviu, reprezentand un bilet de internare si recomandare de internarea voluntara, asa-zisul procuror
Mihaila Paul a Hartuit pe mama mea cu mai multe apeluri telefonice, Amenintand si Santajand ca daca
nu ma va convinge sa ma internez voluntar, va falsifica internarea mea nevoluntara cu ajutorul
judecatorului, ceea ce a condus la urmatoarea situatie deoarece am refuzat internarea mea voluntara:
asa-zisul judecator Craciun Contantin Catalin, un fost politist din Vaslui la ordinele ilicite ale
grupului infractional local din Focsani, a falsificat hotararea judecatoreasca din dosarul 11224/231/2015
in fond la Judecatoria Focsani, avand obiectul internarea nevoluntara, prin incalcarea legii si a ratiunii
judiciare, precum am demonstrat formuland contestatie si anuland aceasta hotarare judecatoreasca in
dosarul 11224/231/2015 in contestatie la Tribunalul Vrancea.
In fapt, in dosarul 2417/P/2014 nu a fost pusa in miscare actiunea penala, avand calitatea de
suspect care reprezinta faptul ca nu exista probe impotriva mea deoarece precum am demonstrat in
inscrisurile anexate la prezenta, dosarul 2417/P/2014 este inventat de asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela si
asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul in scopul de a savarsit infractiuni impotriva mea, nu de a-l trimite in
judecata unde acestia stiu ca vor pierde.
Mai mult, deoarece asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul a avut un episod maniacal si crezandu-se
judecator m-a condamnat pentru o infractiune care n-am savarsit-o prin ordonanta de renuntarea la
urmarirea penala nelegala si netemeinica din 10.12.2015 din dosarul 2417/P/2014 in care a mintit ca am
savarsit infractiunea de Ultrajul judiciar vadit netemeinic deoarece:
1. infractiunea de Ultrajul judiciar nu este o infractiune propriu-zisa, ci o circumstanta agravanta
pentru savarsirea altor infractiuni fata de un magistrat, ori in dosarul 2417/P/2014 nu am fost vreodata
acuzat de o alta infractiune, si
2. in prealabilul emiterii ordonantei de renuntarea la urmarirea penala n-a pus in miscare
actiunea penala, ceea ce se impune cf. art. 7, si art. 314 (1) si art. 318 (1)(2) din CPP pe care le-a invocat,
constat ca nu am nici macar la modul tehnic calitatea de suspect in dosarul 2417/P/2014, adica
in mod nelegal si netemeinic asa cum am fost urmarit penal 12 luni fara sa mi se aduca la cunostinta
aceasta timp de 9 luni din acest rastimp desi era obligatoriu cf. 311 (3) din CPP, implicit in dosarul
14277/231/2015 nu am calitatatea de suspect, si evident nici calitatea de inculpat, intimat, infractor sau
recidivist sau orice alta calitate decat cea de NEVINOVAT

In discutia fondului raportului medico-legal psihiatric falsificat, pe care nu l-am putut retine in
graba deoarece nu mi s-a permis consultarea dosarului 14277/231/2015 decat o scurta perioada de timp
la data de 11.12.2015, in esenta am observat ca asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici Silviu si complicii sai
care au semnat "la foc automat" raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica falsificat, au declarat ca
am halucinat faptul ca le-am anulat propunerea de internare ne/voluntara ca nefondata in dosarul
11224/231/2015 in contestatie la Tribunalul Vrancea, adica faptul ca am demonstrat ca acestia fac parte
din grupul infractional organizat local, si ca elucubreaza ca hotararile judecatoresti, legea, drepturile
persoanelor si sistemul judiciar sunt halucinatiile mele, ceea ce retin drept proba de schizofrenie a asa-
zisului medic-legist Lucasievici Silviu si complicilor sai membri ai Comisiei de expertiza medico-legala
psihiatrica din cadrul Serviciului de medicina legala Vrancea, care au pierdut vadit orice contact cu
realitatea juridica, profesionala si socioala, reprezentand un pericol nu doar pentru public ci si pentru
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 281 of 403

propria persoana incriminandu-se penal in flagrant, si proba de sociopatie sau tulburare antisociala de
personalitate, fiindca incalca in mod pervaziv legea si drepturile persoanelor
Mai mult, am demonstrat si faptul ca diagnosticul prezumtiv este falsificat prin faptul ca am
dovedit fondul asa-zisului raport de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica falsificat in mai multe moduri,
fara a aborda toate minciunile proferate de asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici Silviu care a redactat
raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatric, pentru a nu urmari proverbiala piatra aruncata in lac si
aglomera dosarul 14277/231/2015. In cel mai scurt mod am demonstrat falsitatea diagnosticului
prezumtiv de tulburarea de personalitate paranoida prin faptul ca aceasta fanfaronada lingvistica se
poate inlocui cu afirmatia ca o persoana este suspicioasa, ori am demonstrat ca nu sunt o persoana
suspicioasa prin faptul ca am discutat cu asa-zisii psihiatri amiabil pe 17.09.2015, fara a considera ca
sunt intr-atat de nebuni incat sa se incrimineze penal in flagrant - evident fiind nebuneste a crede ca nu
unul sau doi, ci 5 (cinci) psihiatri sunt nu doar infractori ci si schizofrenici si sociopati dat fiind ca ocupa
functia de medici psihiatri, dar intr-adevar pe de alta parte, sociopatii aproape intotdeauna se
organizeaza in gasti, ceea ce e doar natural pentru niste animale, si mint in mod obsesiv fiind capabili sa
insele vigilenta unor naivi, sau sa ocupe o pozitie sociala prin fapte penale impotriva libertatii sau fapte
de coruptie, adica mai precis prin Hartuire, Amenintare si Santaj, respectiv prin Darea de mita, Luarea
de Mita si Traficul de influenta

Mai mult, facand abstractie de probatoriul amplu al sanatatii mele mintale depus in dosarul
11224/231/2015 anexat la dosarul 14277/231/2015, dovada scurta prin care spulber orice dubiu cu
privire la sanatatea mea mintala si cel putin ridic suspiciunea legitima a alienarii mintale a procurorului si
membrilor Comisiei, realitate care este de notorietate deoarece am facut publice dosarele penale
privind acesti infractori impreuna cu profilul lor psihologic, dar realitate care nu face decat in mod
indirect obiectul prezentului dosar, e faptul ca eu am formulat contestatia impotriva hotararii nelegale si
netemeinice din dosarul 11224/231/2015 si nu avocatul din oficiu, si anuland propunerea de internarea
mea nevoluntara emisa de asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul si actele juridice emise de asa-zisul medic
legist Lucasievici Silviu, am demonstrat ca am discernamant d.p.d.v. medical si d.p.d.v. juridic spre
diferenta de acestia, conform literaturii de specialitate medico-legala psihiatrice anexate la prezenta
privind tipurile de discernamant
Pentru a elimina orice indoiala asupra sanatatii mele psihice, coroborez dovada faptului ca nu
sunt suspicios ci rational, prin evidenta faptului ca nu am deschis dosar penal asa-zisului procuror
Mihaila Paul si asa-zisului medic-legist Lucasievici Silviu, decat dupa ce au savarsit in flagrant infractiunile
de falsurile in inscrisuri, infractiunile de serviciu, infractiunile de impiedicarea infaptuirii justitiei,
infractiunile de coruptie si alte infractiuni

In privinta celorlalte acte “medicale”, precizez ca asa-zisii “medici psihiatri” in cardasie cu


“organele judiciare” au refuzat ilegal sa-mi comunice aceste acte “medicale”, delirand ca daca nu mi le
comunica nu le pot declara falsificate ceea ce am si declarat pe propria raspundere, am facut si proba
veritatii declaratiilor mele astfel inatacabile tocmai fiindca n-au fost atacate in ciuda intentiei criminale a
partii adverse care astfel recunoaste tacit ca am dreptate si ca “organele judiciare” si complicii lor sunt
infractorii, ori, necomunicarea acestor acte le face inadmisibile ca probe conform principiului
contradictorialitatii de la baza dreptului meu garantat la aparare, adica unul din garantiile procesuale
fundamentale de la baza unui proces echitabil adica legal cf. art. 6 din CEDO. Deasemenea reamintesc
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 282 of 403

ca nu mi s-a comunicat de fapt la cerere nici un act din dosarele penale cf. art. 94 (2)(8) din CPP, special
pentru a mi se impiedica dreptul la aparare, cerere nesolutionata pe care o invoc drept proba deoarece
priveste inclusiv actele “medicale”, referindu-ma sa mi se comunice toate elementele din dosar
necomunicate de mine la dosar

In continuare demonstrez in baza literaturii de specialitate si a probei 2 reprezentand un


documentar subtitrat in romana privind realitatea faptului ca pshiatria este o sarlatanie, si prin urmare
art. 245-248 din Codul de procedura penala sunt introduse in sprijinul acestei sarlatanii. Tulburarile de
personalitate nu sunt boli ci denumiri inventate si atribuite unor sentimente sau complexe sentimentale
normale, menite sa creeze o imagine de autenticitate si sa macheze realitatea faptului ca psihiatria nu
este o stiinta medicala deoarece nu poate trata nici o asa-zisa boala sau tulburare de personalitate. In
realitate prin asa-zisa medicamentatie psihiatrica nu se trateaza nici o asa-zisa boala psihiatrica fiindca
acestea nu exista, si in mod vadit psihiatrii habar nu au s-o administreze in scopul urmarit, dovedit prin
faptul ca daca-i confrunti cerandu-le sa demonstreze stiintific cum functioneaza medicamentatia
prescrisa si beneficiul care-l aduce pacientului, fac crize de nervi. In fapt, chiar in rastimpul de o ora in
care am fost Privat ilegal de libertate de asa-zisa Comisie de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica, una din
doamnele blonde a proferat aberatia cum ca psihiatria si sistemul endocrin n-au nici o legatura, ori,
dovada scurta este specialitatea interdisciplinara neuroendocrinologia, si evidenta de cultura generala a
faptului ca medicamentatia psihiatrica are ca principiu activ afectarea substantelor
neurotransmitatoare, adica a hormonilor eliberati de sistemul neuroendocrin, dintre care enumar pe cei
mai cunoscuti: serotonina, dopamina si noradrenalina, si asa-zisul tratament medical se bazeaza pe
ipoteza ca toate tulburarile de personalitate sunt cauzate de un dezechilibru hormonal, in timp ce
evident asa-zisii psihiatri habar nu au daca exista sau nu o legatura intre o stare psihica si sistemul
endocrin, dar prescriu medicamentatie care afecteaza sistemul endocrin.
Insasi psihiatria recunoaste ca tulburarile de personalitate nu sunt boli, citez din literatura de
specialitate de la adresa: http://www.sanatateatv.ro/articole-medicale/psihiatrie/tulburarea-de-
personalitate-o-problema-grava-din-punct-de-vedere-social/
"
Tulburarile de personalitate nu reprezinta o boala în sine.
...
Tulburarile de personalitate propriu-zise nu sunt niste boli pentru ca bolile, conform definitiei acestora
trebuie sa aiba un debut, o evolutie, un sfârsit, fie o vindecare, fie o cronicizare.
...
a declarat într-un interviu pentru www.sanatateatv.ro, prof. univ. dr. Florin Tudose, sef Departamentul
de Psihiatrie, Spitalul Universitar de Urgenta Bucuresti.
"

si coroborez prin alt citat de la adresa: http://www.csid.ro/boli-afectiuni/psihiatrie/tulburarile-de-


personalitate-12840213/
"
Tulburarile de personalitate nu se incadreaza in tiparul clasic de boala. Nu au un debut limitat in timp, o
perioada de stare si apoi !o vindecare in urma unui tratament!. Nefiind boli au fost denumite dezvoltari
dizarmonice ale structurii psihice ale persoanei in cauza.
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 283 of 403

"
Repet din citat: "NU AU ... O VINDECARE IN URMA UNUI TRATAMENT! NEFIIND BOLI..."

Aceasta realitate o demonstrez prin documentarul stiintific "Comercializarea nebuniei" pe care-l


anexez la dosarul 14277/231/2015 drept proba 2, si prin cererea de aducere a acestui dosar la
12718/231/2017 proba si la acest dosar, documentar din care nu este necesar decat a se viziona primele
5 minute si 20 de secunde care sunt edificatoare, infatisand marturia mai multor psihologi si pacienti,
demonstrand stiintific sarlatania practicata sub denumirea de psihiatrie, care in Romania evident este
utilizata ca o arma de terorism, de intimidare, de constrangere si de hartuire, si arma pentru Vatamarea
corporala, Supunerea la rele tratamente, Lipsirea de libertate in mod ilegal si savarsirea de alte
infractiuni grave precum atesta dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016, 4329/P/2016 si 12718/231/2017,
precum este de notorietate evident fiindca am facut publica pe internet activitatea grupului infractional
local, impreuna cu dosarele lor penale pentru a se identifica cu usurinta vinovatii daca acestia reusesc sa
ma vateme grav astfel incat sa nu ma mai pot apara si urmari condamnarea lor, sau sa omoare, precum
am demonstrat
in inscrisul anexat la dosarul 11224/231/2015 pe care l-ati adus in dosarul 14277/231/2015,
privind sesizarea Comisiilor de cercetarea abuzurilor din Senat si Camera Deputatilor,
si in inscrisul anexat la dosarul 11224/231/2015 pe care l-ati adus in dosarul 14277/231/2015,
privind cererea de punere sub programul de protectie a martorilor cf. art. 125 din CPP in dosarul
421/P/2015 avand inculpat pe d-l Mihaila Paul, d-na Dita Mirela si alti complici, dosar instrumentat de
Directia Nationala Anticoruptie.
Conform probei materiale audio-video anexate, prin tratament medical psihiatric este in mod
constant vatamat sistemul nervos si introdusa starea de depresie majora si ideatizarea sinuciderii,
acesta fiind adevaratul motiv pentru care grupul infractional local a introdus actiunea de obligarea mea
la tratament medical, pentru a ma vatama prin injectarea cu substante toxice sau in alte moduri, sau
chiar ucide, aceasta fiind a saptea tentativa de Omor calificat si Vatamarea corporala (primele doua
fiind 27.10.2014-05.12.2014 de catre interlopul Herghelegiu Danut instigat de acest grup infractional
organizat, urmatoarele patru fiind actiuni psihiatrice falsificate dintre care am si anulat pe primele trei
drept dovada adica 11224/231/2015 si 14277/231/2015 la fond si contestatie, urmata de actiunea vadit
falsificata 4909/231/2017 in acelasi mod ca 11224/231/2015 prin care am fost Vatamat corporal grav in
perioada 27.05.2017-08.06.2017, urmata de dosarul falsificat 12718/231/2017 in acelasi mod ca
14277/231/2015, mafia urmarind lichidarea mea pentru a nu le denunta activitatea criminala precum
am demonstrat in dosarele lor penale. Dosarele 11224/231/2015 si 4909/231/2017 avand obiectul
internarea nevoluntara in scopul examinarii mele psihiatrice care evident n-are nici o logica juridica din
moment ce nu-mi voi da vreodata consimtamantul sa fiu vatamat de sarlatania numita psihiatria,
adevaratul motiv fiind obsesia grupului infractional local de a ma pune intr-o situatie de vulnerabilitate
pentru a ma vatama prin injectare cu substante toxice sau in alte moduri, precum am fost injectat fara
acordul meu cu o substanta necunoscuta in zona cotului drept, de catre o persoana necunoscuta,
crezand ca nu simt, la serviciul de urgenta a Spitalului "Sf. Pantelimon" Focsani dupa ce am fost
transportat in urma tentativei de Omor calificat si Vatamarea corporala savarsita in flagrant de
interlopul Herghelegiu Danut, instigat de grupul infractional local prins deasemenea in flagrant
ascunzand probele in dosarul penal 246/P/2015 in scopul de a Favoriza faptuitorul Herghelegiu Danut.
Exista numeroase alte probe ale constituirii intr-un grup infractional organizat intre asa-zisii procurori
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 284 of 403

Mihaila Paul, Tarlea Florin Cristinel, asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela, interlopul Herghelegiu Danut si alti
politisti, procurori si judecatori locali. Dosarele 14277/231/2015 si 12718/231/2017 avand obiectul
obligarea la tratament medical iarasi nu au nici o logica juridica, deoarece mai mult de faptul ca
expertiza psihiatrica nu poate avea loc datorita refuzului meu de a-mi da consimtamantul, asa-zisii
psihiatri, “organe judiciare” in cardasie cu asa-zise organe de ordine locale au folosit violenta si
amenintarea cu violenta pentru a ma “obliga la tratament medical” pe 27.05.2017 fara drept adica in
mod ilega, fara diagnostic, arestandu-ma de la Scoala “Anghel Saligny” unde urma sa dau 2 examene la
facultatea de drept a Universitatii Ecologice, legandu-ma la psihiatrie si injectandu-ma cu substante
neurotoxice pe baza de fluor si clor adica Haloperidol si Diazepam precum tinandu-ma si in conditii
septice pentru a ma imbolnavi adica cu oameni ai strazii nespalati dintre care unul l-au pus in pat cu
mine in tentativa de a ma imbolnavi, in masura in care conform regulamentului fiecare pat este atribuit
unei singure persoane, exista un numar maxim de paturi per salon, o distanta intre acestea, se intretin
normele de igienta in spital si curatenia s.a.m.d., nici una din acestea nefiind respectate de oligofrenii
criminali care se dau drept medici la Spitalul “Sf. Pantelimon” Focsani, si care conform presei si
constatarilor SRI si ale parchetului general fac experimente ilegal pe “pacienti” adica pe oameni
nevinovati conform evidentei publice ECRIS a dosarelor, adusi cu violenta de “organele judiciare”, alti
psihopati criminali Constituiti intr-un grup infractional organizat, precum a fost adus d-l Grosu Ulise
care a castigat la CEDO cu privire la aceasta stare de fapt dealtfel

In urma analizei unei analize mai amanuntite a fondului raportului de expertiza medico-legala
psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232 constat in continuare ca este falsificat in flagrant in fapt, deoarece
decompensarea (persistenta) de aspect delirant, inseamna simptomatica (persistenta) a tulburarii
delirante de personalitate. Tulburarea deliranta de personalitate inseamna acel comportament
caracterizat de o idee halucinata adica nereala. Asa-zisii psihiatri declara in esenta ca am halucinat faptul
ca in dosarul 11224/231/2015 propunerea lor de internare ne/voluntara la psihiatrie a fost declarata
nefondata, adica in opinia asa-zisilor psihiatri din Comisia de expertiza medico-legala de la Serviciul de
medicina legala Vrancea, hotararile judecatoresti, legea si sistemul judiciar, toate fata de care acestia nu
au nici un respect in mod evident, sunt halucinatiile mele. Retin aceasta drept dovada a schizofreniei si
tulburarii antisociale de personalitate cu aspect delirant al asa-zisilor psihiatri Lucasievici Silviu, seful
Comisiei de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica din cadrul SML Vrancea, Bezverhnii Igor, Florea Gabriela,
Mihai Oana Georgiana, Luminita Grajdeanu.
Mai mult fiindca asa-zisii psihiatri sunt schizofrenici si sociopati sau cu tulburare antisociala de
persoanalitate cu aspect delirant:
- au pierdut contactul total cu realitatea juridica, profesionala si sociala, reprezentand
schizofrenia, si
- incalca in mod pervaziv legea si drepturile persoanelor reprezentand sociopatia, si
- nu pot fi convinsi pe cale logica sa adopte un comportament civilizat, reprezentand aspectul
delirant,
precum am demonstrat in baza literaturii de specialitate, acestia in esenta declarand prin
raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica ca am halucinat legea, si mi-am imaginat art. 184(1)(3)
din CPP si art. 10,11 din Legea 487/2002 conform careia nu pot fi expertizat psihiatric daca nu sunt
suspect, inculpat sau condamnat pentru savarsirea infractiunilor de omor sau pruncucidere, respectiv ca
este obligatoriu consimtamantul meu liber pentru expertizarea mea psihiatrica, exprimat in scris, toate
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 285 of 403

aceste conditii nefiind indeplinite, ceea ce in mod convers demonstreaza falsificarea raportului de
expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica nr. 970/A1-P/232, precum si schizofrenia si tulburarea antisociala de
personalitate cu aspect delirant sau sociopatia asa-zisilor psihiatri Lucasievici Silviu, seful Comisiei de
expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica din cadrul SML Vrancea, Bezverhnii Igor, Florea Gabriela, Mihai Oana
Georgiana, Luminita Grajdeanu.
Deasemenea asa-zisii psihiatrici considera ca am halucinat realitatea faptului ca in mod ilegal si
netemeinic asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul a propus obligarea mea la tratament medical pentru a ma
pune intr-o situatie de vulnerabilitate si a ma injecta cu substante toxice,
precum dealtfel grupul infractional organizat din care face parte asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul
a procedat prin falsificarea dosarelor 4791/231/2017 si 4909/231/2017 urmarind sa ma interneze la
psihiatrie de Sfintele Pasi in Saptamana Mare, apoi arestandu-ma de la examenele la facultatea de drept
pe 27.05.2017, legandu-ma si otravindu-ma cu substante neurotoxice pe baza de fluor si clor pana pe
data de 08.06.2017,
exact cum am demonstrat ca va proceda inca de cand a incercat sa ma interneze nevoluntar in
acest scop prin dosarul 11224/231/2015 in care am anulat ca nefondata propunerea de internarea mea
nevoluntara la psihiatrie in 11224/231/2015 in faza de contestatie la Tribunalul Vrancea, si prin faptul ca
am fost deja injectat fara acordul meu cu o substanta toxica necunoscuta in zona cotului drept la
serviciul de urgenta a Spitalului "Sf. Pantelimon" de o persoana necunoscuta, in noaptea de 05-
06.12.2015, autorul crezand ca nu voi simti,
dosarul 12718/231/2017 reprezentand intentia criminala a acestui grup infractional organizat de
a ma Vatama corporal grav sau ucide prin otravirea mea cu neurotoxina Invega care conform companiei
care comercializeaza aceasta otrava ca “medicament”, dealtfel condamnata repetat in SUA pentru
comercializarea de otravuri drept “medicamente”, pe langa sutele de vatamari corporale permanente
care le poate produce, poate produce inclusiv moartea precum este documentata aceasta stiintific prin
faptul ca oameni au murit otraviti cu fluor sau asa-zisul medicament Invega, despre care mentionez pe
scurt ca era metoda nazista de a reprima dizidenta in lagarele de concentrare, si despre care mentionez
ca spune in prospect ca trateaza schizofrenia pentru care nu am fost dealtfel diagnosticat, precum nu
am fost diagnosticat ca sa fiu otravit la Sectia de psihiatrie a Spitalului “Sf. Pantelimon” in perioada
27.05.2017-08.06.2017, fapt pe care-l probez prin fisa de externare care nu prezinta diagnosticul de
schizofrenia pentru a justifica otravirea mea cu Invega, si nu prezinta nici un diagnostic anterior
perioadei de 08.06.2017 pentru otravirea mea cu Haloperidol, Diazepam si Prazolez in perioada
27.05.2017-08.06.2017, fapt evident probat prin faptul ca sunt declarat fara discernamant dar nu exista
tratament pentru lipsa de discernamant fiindca altfel toata lumea ar lua pastile pentru prostie, si fapt
evident probat prin lege si regulament adica faptul ca nu pot fi diagnosticat in perioada de 27.05.2017-
08.06.2017 pentru datele de 18.05.2016 si 24.06.2016, cu atat mai mult cu cat nu am fost intrebat
absolut nimic despre dosarele 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 sau chiar 2417/P/2014, iar
asa-zisele examene psihologice adica testele de personalitate si inteligenta sunt identice ca cele pe care
le-am dat la medicina muncii si armata, ori fiindca nu am fost diagnosticat in prealabil in concluzie este
demonstrat mai presus de orice dubii rezonabile ca toate actele “medicale” din aceste dosare penale
mentionate sunt falsificate, fapt certificat prin medina muncii, medicina armatei, probele din dosare
care-mi demonstreaza nevinovatia s.a.m.d.
Mai mult fiindca asa-zisii psihiatri sunt bolnavi mintal, au declarat in primul rand in singurul
document care l-am obtinut de unde era ascuns la arhiva judecatoriei si nu fiindca mi s-a comunicat, ca
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 286 of 403

fiindca PROBABIL am o boala psihica, trebuie sa fiu obligat la tratament medical, ceea ce este dovada
flagranta de irationalitate si opera unor nebuni, prin aceasta propunere incalcandu-se suplimentar art.
107 si art. 108 din CP care statueaza ca un om nevinovat nu poate fi supus la tratament medical
psihiatric, dar si faptul ca tulburarile de personalitate nu sunt tratabile medical precum am demonstrat
mai sus in baza literaturii de specialitate si a unei probe materiale audio-video privind un documentar
asupra acestei realitati coroborate de mai mult psihologi si pacienti
In concluzie fiindca aceiasi “psihiatri” care au falsificat actul “medical” din 2015, au falsificat
precum am demonstrat celelalte acte “medicale”, au falsificat si celelalte acte “medicale” deoarece nu
exista nici o schimbare in modus operandi a acestor infractori
In dovedire privind nelegalitatea si netemeinicia intentarii unei actiuni de obligarea mea la
tratament medical, invoc legea

Cod penal
Dispoziţii generale
Art. 107
Scopul măsurilor de siguranţă

(1) Măsurile de siguranţă au ca scop înlăturarea unei stări de pericol şi preîntâmpinarea săvârşirii
faptelor prevăzute de legea penală.
(2) Măsurile de siguranţă se iau faţă de persoana care a comis o faptă prevăzută de legea penală,
nejustificată.
(3) Măsurile de siguranţă se pot lua şi în situaţia în care făptuitorului nu i se aplică o pedeapsă.

Faptuitor inseamna condamnat, deoarece prezumtia de nevinovatie a suspectilor si inculpatilor


inseamna nevinovat nu faptuitor, si inseamna cand exista un singur inculpat ca fapta nici un exista de
fapt, si deoarece doar condamnatului i se aplica sau nu pedeapsa penala, de catre un judecator al
instantei penale prin hotarare judecatoreasca penala, cf. art. 1 din Legea 303/2004 privind faptul ca
infaptuirea justitiei este prerogativa exclusiva a judecatorului

Cod penal
Dispoziţii generale
Art. 108
Categoriile măsurilor de siguranţă
Măsurile de siguranţă sunt:
a) obligarea la tratament medical;

Nu in ultimul rand, o alta proba flagranta a alienarii mintale a asa-zisilor psihiatri o constituie
declaratia "tulburare de personalitate de tip paranoid cu decompensare (persistenta) de aspect delirant",
ceea ce este un pleonasm, fiind in termeni psihiatrici echivalentul diagnosticului de tulburarea de
personalitate de tip paranoid cu aparitia unui grup de simptome (persistente) ale tulburarii de
personalitate de tip paranoid. Decompensare inseamna aparitia unui grup de simptome, si aspect
delirant inseamna convingerea absoluta a persoanei care nu poate fi combatuta cu argumente logice,
dar care este specifica, ceea ce asa-zisii psihiatri nu au precizat deoarece sunt idioti conform etimologiei
termenului idiot provenind din Atena antica, adica indivizi care nu cunosc o meserie si care sunt
dezinteresati de treburile publice
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 287 of 403

In dovedire invoc enciclopedia Wikipedia



An idiot, dolt, dullard or (archaically) mome is an intellectually disabled person, or someone who acts in
a self-defeating or significantly counterproductive way.
...
An idiot in Athenian democracy was someone who was characterized by self-centeredness and
concerned almost exclusively with private—as opposed to public—affairs.

Traducere in romana:

Un idiot este o persoana dezafectata intelectual, sau cineva care actioneaza defetist sau intr-un mod
semnificativ contraproductiv
...
Un idiot in democratia ateniana era cineva care era caracterizat prin egocentrism si preocupat de afaceri
personale in comparatie antonimica cu treburile publice sau interesul public

fapt pe care-l sustin deoarece pe data de 17.09.2015 am ramas cu impresia ca asa-zisilor medici
psihiatri li se pare normal ca cetatenii sa fie niste idioti care-si autocenzureaza drepturile, in alte cuvinte,
sclavi.

In continuare citez din literatura de specialitate:

de la adresa http://www.la-psiholog.ro/info/tulburarea-de-personalitate-paranoida
definitia tulburarii de personalitate de tip paranoid este:

Personalitatea paranoida este un diagnostic psihiatric caracterizat prin paranoia si neincredere
generalizata in altii.

Diagnosticul prezumtiv de tulburarea de personalitate paranoida este un fals, deoarece
personalitatea mea a fost caracterizata prin increderea in altii datorata unei prejudecati care cel mai
adesea caracterizeaza oamenii onesti si se numeste naivitate sau ignoranta, urmata de adoptarea un
model superior de gandire analitica care a inlocuit modelul bazat pe instinct privind increderea sau
neincrederea in altii, care a devenit irelevant

de la adresa: http://www.esanatos.com/ghid-medical/psihiatrie/termeni-
psihiatrici/decompensare95181.php
definitia decompensarii persistente este, citez “aparitia unui grup de simptome” persistente

de la adresa: http://www.romedic.ro/delir-tulburare-deliranta
definitia aspectului delirant este, citez: “convingerea absoluta a persoanei care nu poate fi combatuta cu
argumente logice”
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 288 of 403

In concluzie, asa-zisii psihiatrii nu doar au emis un raport de expertiza medico-legala falsificat, ci


au demonstrat in flagrant ca sunt semidocti pronuntand un diagnostic pleonastic, adica tulburarea de
personalitate de tip paranoid cu aparitia unui grup de simptome (persistente) ale tulburarii de
personalitate de tip paranoid, dat fiind ca nu precizeaza tipul aspectului delirant, se poate retine ca se
refera tot la paranoia, adica aspectele delirante fiind simptomele persistente ale tulburarii de
personalitate paranoide. Fiindca este evident ca un diagnostic este dat in baza simptomelor observate, a
declara in denumirea diagnosticului ca au aparut simptome este pleonastic, asa cum era de asteptat de
la niste idioti care s-au constituit intr-un grup infractional organizat asa cum se intampla de fiecare data
in cazul sociopatilor – mafia sau crima organizata este intotdeauna alcatuita din badarani si subeducati,
in cazul particular al asa-zisilor medici legisti, care au facut facultatea de medicina dand mita la
examinatori evident fiindca habar n-au meserie, precum au demonstrat singuri incriminandu-se penal in
flagrant demonstrand ca sunt schizofrenici deoarece au halucinat ca pot incalca legea in flagrant fara sa
fie prinsi in flagarnt, reprezentand asadar un pericol nu doar pentru societate ci si pentru propria lor
persoana, si ca sunt sociopati deoarece incalca in mod pervaziv legea si drepturile persoanelor

Mai mult, Comisia de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica minte ca am discernamant mult


diminuat in flagrant, deoarece in primul rand se contrazice pe parcursul raportului de expertiza medico-
legala psihiatrica, prin retinerile ca de exemplu citez: “studii superioare”, “am lucrat 3 ani” (in realitate
am vechime 4 ani, si am lucrat si mai multi ani in particular), “bagaj notional crescut”, “asociatii ideative
rapide, tahipsihie” – din nou asa-zisii psihiatri se exprima pleonastic, demonstrand ca au luat notiuni la
intamplare si le-au aruncat pe o foaie si au numit aceasta raport de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica in
scopul de a falsifica aparentele autenticitatii unui raport de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica intocmit
in conditiile legii.
Discernamantul este de doua feluri, medical si juridic conform literaturii de specialitate medico-
legala. Deoarece conform literaturii de specialitate invocate, intitulata “EXPERTIZA MEDICO-LEGALĂ
PSIHIATRICĂ” de VASILCU MIHAI SILVIU, medic specialist in medicina-legala, eu mi-am insusit ca pe o
comanda sociala interioara legea, spre diferenta de asa-zisii psihiatri care s-au incriminat in flagrant
incalcand legea, si am demonstrat ca discernamantul meu este aproape perfect d.p.d.v. juridic si
medical, si in schimb discernamantul asa-zisilor psihiatri lipseste cu desavarsire. Mai mult fiindca asa-zisii
psihiatri au esuat si in cariera de infractori deoarece s-au incriminat penal dinainte sa-i intalnesc chiar
prin incalcarea in flagrant a art. 184 (1) din CPP, este din nou demonstrat ca acestia nu au nici
discernamant d.p.d.v. medical nici juridic, adica capacitatea de a formula un plan si a-l pune in actiune
cu succes, spre diferenta de mine care am formulat un plan, adica pledoaria contestatiei dosarului
11224/231/2015 la Tribunalul Vrancea spre exemplu, cu care am anulat hotararea de internare
ne/voluntara ilegala si netemeinica dispusa in dosarul 11224/231/2015 in fond la Judecatoria Focsani de
catre unul din criminalii din grupul infractional organizat din care fac parte asa-zisii psihiatri, asa-zisul
judecator Craciun Constantin Catalin, un fost politist din Vaslui la ordinele grupului infractional local din
Focsani

Mai mult, asa-zisii psihiatri Lucasievici Silviu, seful Comisiei de expertiza medico-legala
psihiatrica din cadrul SML Vrancea, Bezverhnii Igor, Florea Gabriela, Mihai Oana Georgiana, Luminita
Grajdeanu, au opinat semidoct alte criterii in falsificarea raportului de expertiza medico-legala
psihiatrica, adica:
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 289 of 403

- "absenta constiintei bolii la momentul actual". Corect romaneste se spune constientizarea bolii, si
fiindca boala nu exista nu am ce constientiza, cu exceptia alienarii mintale a asa-zisilor psihiatri pe care-i
voi pune sub interdictie
- “imprevizibilitate in relatiile sociale”. Aceasta este un fals, deoarece sunt perfect predictibil in relatiile
sociale, si anume la fel ca restul oamenilor civilizati tratez pe toata lumea civilizat, adica ma comport
civilizat fata de prieteni si raufacatori deopotriva, adica spre exemplu raufacatorilor daca savarsesc o
infractiune impotriva mea, formulez plangere penala, respectiv sunt un prieten de nadejde pentru alti
oameni cinstiti, unii dintre care sufera din cauza abuzurilor savarsite de alti asa-zisi psihiatri criminali din
Romania, inhaitati cu crima organizata alcatuita din asa-zisele organe judiciare, motiv pentru care a
aparut sintagma de notorietate “republica procurorilor” referindu-se la aceasta tagma de functionari
corupti aproape in intregime din parchete, ceea ce pot si eu demonstra statistic ca este adevarat.
- “determinare si perseverenta irationale”. Aceasta este un fals, deoarece determinarea si perseverenta
a condus la anularea hotararii de internarea mea nevoluntara de exemplu, deci acestea s-au dovedit a
constitui a fi virtuti intr-adevar. Asa zisii psihiatri in esenta declara ca este irational sa fii determinat si
perseverent in a te comporta civilizat si a fi interesat de progresul societatii civilizate, pentru ca precum
am citat si demonstrat mai sus, acestia sunt idioti, adica lipsiti de pricepere si interes in treburile publice.
- “risc de escaladare rapida de la violenta virtuala si de limbaj la violenta fizica”. Aceasta este un fals,
deoarece nu exista o singura dovada de violenta virtuala si de limbaj, orice ar reprezenta acestea, sau de
violenta fizica. In acest caz recunosc instigarea asa-zisului procuror Mihaila Paul care in mod obsesiv
crede ca poate falsifica realitatea insasi mintind maniacal, demonstrand in consecinta ca este
mitomaniac, ceea ce constituie o simptoma a mai multor tulburari pshiatrice si una din caracteristicile
sociopatiei sau a tulburarii antisociale de personalitate

In concluzie deoarece aceiasi asa-zisi psihiatri au falsificat toate actele “medicale”, cu usurinta
constat ca faptul ca acestia ascund aceste documente de mine tocmai pentru a nu le demonstra in
concret gogomaniile penibile, dat fiind ca oricum am demonstrat ca orice acte “medicale” emise de
acestia sunt ilegale inainte sa incerce sa le falsifice, si netemeinice fiindca n-au dreptul sa le intocmeasca
in lipsa mea si fara consimtamantul meu caz in care acestea nu pot fi decat falsificate

In dovedire, declar pe propria raspundere pentru a face proba veritatii ca precum am


demonstrat raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica nu este doar vadit falsificat de drept,
incalcandu-se art. 184 (1)(3) din CPP si art. 10, 11 din Legea 487/2002 precum si multe alte articole din
regulamentele si metodologia ce abiliteaza medicina-legala, precum si codul deontologic al medicilor
legisti, ci raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica este falsificat in fapt sub toate aspectele
precum pot demonstra la cerere, fiindca nu-mi pierd vremea sa scot proverbiala piatra din lac a 5 (cinci)
asa-zisi psihiatri alienati mintal, carora le voi deschide dosar penal si voi sesiza Comisia de malpraxis, cu
publicarea intregului demers pentru a avertiza societatea civila cu privire la pericolul ce-l reprezinta
acesti infractori
Asa-zisii medici legisti au stiut precis scopul pentru care au falsificat raportul de expertiza
medico-legala psihiatrica, deoarece au intretinut conform inscrisurilor din 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 o comunicare directa cu organele judiciare, si dupa ce n-au reusit sa ma
interneze nevoluntar ilegal si netemeinic, au trecut direct la obiectivul lor real, mascat de propunerea de
internarea nevoluntara ilegala si netemeinica, si anume la propunerea de obligarea mea la tratament
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 290 of 403

medical provizoriu, in scopul de a ma vatama prin injectarea cu substante toxice sau in alte moduri.
Aceste propuneri sunt vadit nelegale si netemeinice, precum a fost declarata nefondata propunerea de
internarea mea nevoluntara in 11224/231/2015 si precum este propunerea identica din 4909/231/2017,
respectiv propunerea de obligarea mea la tratament medical provizoriu din 14277/231/2015 este
inadmisibila fiindca este nelegala si netemeinica la fel ca cea din 12718/231/2017, deoarece in primul
rand nu sunt condamnat pentru savarsirea omorului sau pruncuciderii ca sa pot fi obligat la tratament
medical in urma unei expertize psihiatrice cf. art. 184 (1) din CPP, procedura ce necesita oricum
expertizarea condamnatului cu consimtamantul sau liber cf. art. 184 (3) din CPP si art. 11 din Legea
487/2002, neputandu-se dispune un tratament medical in lipsa diagnosticului, respectiv in lipsa
acordului condamnatului, respectiv fara demonstratia stiintifica a faptului ca condamnatul va recidiva.
Deoarece in dosarele 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 in care am fost acuzat
de fapte fictive si ca le-am comis fara discernamant, s-a dispus incetarea urmaririi penale, asa-zisele
“organe judiciare” avand episoade maniacale de alienare mintala declarand ca am savarsit Ultrajul
judiciar sau Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei, fara a pune in miscare actiunea penala, fara a intocmi
rechizitoriul si trimite dosarul penal in judecata unde sa fiu condamnat de o instanta impartiala, ceea ce
“organele judiciare” stiau ca n-au nici o sansa fiindca probele dosarelor 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 demonstreaza ca nu am savarsit nici o infractiune, ci asa-zisul judecator
Dita Mirela a savarsit Falsul in declaratii si Inducerea in eroare a organelor judiciare
In dovedire cf. art. 107 si art. 108 din Codul Penal, precum si conform jurisprudentei dosarului
907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu-Marmatiei, nu pot fi obligat la tratament medical deoarece n-
am fost condamnat definitiv, dar si din multe alte motive in fapt si de drept demonstrate in prezenta

Cod penal
Dispoziţii generale
Art. 107
Scopul măsurilor de siguranţă

(1) Măsurile de siguranţă au ca scop înlăturarea unei stări de pericol şi preîntâmpinarea săvârşirii
faptelor prevăzute de legea penală.
(2) Măsurile de siguranţă se iau faţă de persoana care a comis o faptă prevăzută de legea penală,
nejustificată.
(3) Măsurile de siguranţă se pot lua şi în situaţia în care făptuitorului nu i se aplică o pedeapsă.

Faptuitor inseamna condamnat, deoarece doar condamnatului i se aplica sau nu pedeapsa


penala, de catre un judecator al instantei penale prin hotarare judecatoreasca penala, cu raspectarea
tuturor garantiilor procesuale si in mod impartial cf. art. 6 din CEDO, cf. art. 1 din Legea 303/2004
privind faptul ca infaptuirea justitiei este prerogativa exclusiva a judecatorului, si cf. art. 2 din Legea
304/2004 privind faptul ca justitia se infaptuieste de instantele judecatoresti

Cod penal
Dispoziţii generale
Art. 108
Categoriile măsurilor de siguranţă
Măsurile de siguranţă sunt:
a) obligarea la tratament medical;
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 291 of 403

In dovedire invoc principiul dreptului unitar cf. art. 124 din Constitutia Romanie si ca
jurisprudenta dosarul 907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei din care citez conform
articolului de specialitate de la adresa: http://www.juridice.ro/346691/romania-la-cedo-cauza-pendinte-
ivascu-internarea-medicala-nevoluntara-la-ordinul-procurorului-dreptul-la-viata-privata-si-raspunderea-
statului.html

La 19 octombrie 2009, procuratura a solicitat instanței pronunțarea unui ordin de tratament psihiatric
obligatoriu. Într-o decizie finală din data de 1 septembrie 2010, Judecătoria Sighetu Marmației a respins
cererea procurorului. Instanța a considerat că, în temeiul articolului 111 din Codul penal, măsurile de
siguranță (cum ar fi admiterea obligatorie într-o unitate medicală și un ordin de a urma un tratament
psihiatric) au drept scop să pună capăt unor situații periculoase și pentru a preveni fenomenul
infracțional. De aceea, ele ar trebui impuse doar persoanelor care au săvârșit infracțiuni prevăzute de
dreptul penal. Prin urmare, un ordin pentru a urma un tratament psihiatric nu poate fi impus
reclamantului până când nu se va stabili că acesta a comis o infracțiune, dar și că există pericolul de a
comite alte infracțiuni pe viitor.

Prin hotararea judecatoreasca din dosarul 907/307/2010 de la Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei
probez faptul moral pe care-l consider de notorietate, ca este ilegal a supune o persoana nevinovata la
tratament medical obligatoriu, sau o persoana care beneficiaza de prezumtia de nevinovatie in cazul
meu in calitate de suspect in dosarul 2417/P/2014 avand obiectul Ultrajul judiciar pana la data de
10.12.2015 cand asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul a falsificat ordonanta de renuntare la urmarirea penala,
suspect insemnand ca nu exista probe impotriva mea, motiv pentru care am formulat plangere penala
prealabila pentru Falsul in declaratii si Inducerea in eroare a organelor judiciare impotriva asa-zisului
judecator Dita Mirela, deoarece precum am declarat pe propria raspundere in dosarul 2417/P/2014, am
savarsit Calomnia si Insulta in scopul efectuarii Probei veritatii faptului ca asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela
nu corespunde profesiei de magistrat, si textele capcana utilizate nu le-am adresat macar asa-zisului
judecator Dita Mirela ci altor complete, si asa-zisul judecator Dita Mirela e cel care a mintit in scopul de
a se victimiza si a atrage in mod ilicit raspunderea mea penala pentru fapte care nici macar nu sunt
incriminate penal, lucru de care eram constient si l-am luat in calcul in premeditarea efectuarii Probei
veritatii. Declaratia mea pe propria raspundere trebuie sa se gaseasca in dosarul 2417/P/2014, depusa
in conditiile legii prin posta electronica, ceea ce probeaza faptul ca am discernamant d.p.d.v. medical si
d.p.d.v. juridic, executand cu succes Proba veritatii prin care am demonstrat ca asa-zisul judecator Dita
Mirela nu corespunde profesiei de magistrat.
Deoarece am declarat pe propria raspundere si demonstrat ca am premeditat efectuarea Probei
veritatii, am demonstrat in flagrant ca asa-zisii medici psihiatri membri ai Comisiei de expertiza medico-
legala psihiatrica mint ca am discernamant mult diminuat, deoarece acestia mintit ca nu sunt constient
de consecintele faptelor mele, ori am demonstrat ca in premeditare am inclus si consecintele faptelor
mele, mai presus de efectuarea Probei veritatii, adica stiind faptul ca nici unul din asa-zisii magistrati
romani nu se supun legii in totalitate, exista riscul de a fi condamnat pentru savarsirea Calomniei si
Insultei in scopul efectuarii Probei veritatii, risc pe care nu mi l-am asumat executand aceasta tehnica a
probei veritatii cu stiinta ca nu exista in prezent Calomnia, Insulta si Proba veritatii in Codul Penal, si mai
mult, m-am asigurat ca conditiile publicitatii si exercitiului functiunii nu sunt intrunite, fiind astfel aparat
din trei parti
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 292 of 403

Mai mult, raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica din 2417/P/2014 este antedatat, fiind
emis in perioada 30.10.2015-03.12.2015 si nu pe data de 17.09.2015, conform probelor filele 99-103 din
2417/P/2015 asa cum le-am gasit in 2220/91/2015, adica faptul ca asa-zisul prim-procuror Tarlea Florin
Cristinel le-a comunicat asa-zisilor psihiatri care au falsificat raportul de expertiza medico-legala, faptul
ca le-am anulat in 11224/231/2015 in contestatie la Tribunalul Vrancea internarea nevoluntara pe care
au propus-o pentru a ma pune intr-o situatie de vulnerabilitate si a ma vatama sau ucide prin injectarea
cu substante toxice, lovire sau alte moduri, banuiala legitima pe care am demonstrat-o prin faptul ca
- pe 05.12.2015 imediat dupa ce interlopul Herghelegiu Danut a savarsit tentativa de Omor
calificat si Vatamarea corporala impotriva mea lovindu-ma cu capul de perete si aruncandu-ma pe
treptele scarii blocului in stare de inconstienta, am fost injectat cu o substanta necunoscuta de o
persoana necunoscuta, fara acordul meu, la serviciul de urgenta a Spitalului "Sf. Pantelimon",
- jandarmeria a refuzat o data sa sesizeze organul de urmarire penala cf. art. 293 din CPP,
- politia a refuzat e 3 (trei) ori sa sesizeze organul de urmarire penala cf. art. 293 din CPP,
- jandarmeria a falsificat realitatea declarand ca eu l-am agresat pe interlopul Herghelegiu Danut
care a chemat jandarmii, fapt prin care i-am prins in flagrant savarsind nu doar Favorizarea faptuitorului
ci si Falsul intelectual si Uzul de fals,
- respectiv Mihaila Paul, Dita Mirela, Tarlea Florin Cristinel au falsificat mai multe acte de
procedura urmarind:
- in 15730/231/2014 (anulat) punerea mea sub interdictie vadit netemeinic,
- in 11224/231/2015 (anulat) internarea mea nevoluntara vadit netemeinic la fel ca-n
4909/231/2017,
- si in 14277/231/2015 (inadmisibil si nefondat) supunerea mea la tratament medical
obligatoriu vadit netemeinic si nelegal la fel ca-n 12718/231/2017, fiind dovedite prin toate aceste
concursuri de infractiuni ca acesti interlopi s-au constituit intr-un grup infractional organizat pentru
savarsirea de infractiuni, dovezi prin care demonstrez ca raportul de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica
este unul din actele falsificate in scopul vatamarii mele, dat fiind scopul acestora vadit nelegal si
netemeinic de a ma pune intr-o situatie de vulnerabilitate si a ma injecta cu substante toxice sau a ma
vatama in alt mod, la fel ca-n cazul tuturor celorlalte acte “medicale” falsificate si ascunse de mine inutil
deorece le-am dovedit oricum falsificate in fapt si de drept
Mai mult, asa-zisii medici legisti mint in raportele de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica
infaptuite in lipsa mea ca am istoric judiciar, prin care se subintelege cazier penal, ceea ce nici macar
asa-zisul procuror Mihaila Paul n-a indraznit sa minta, demonstrand ca boala mintala a asa-zisilor
psihiatri este probabil mai avansata decat a asa-zisului procuror Mihaila Paul, halucinand caziere
inexistente si suspectand oamenii la prima vedere ca sunt infractori, in timp ce ma acuza pe mine de
tulburarea de personalitate de tip paranoid ceea ce conform evidenti ii caracterizeaza pe asa-zisii
psihiatri semnatari ai raportului de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica falsificat

Nu in ultimul rand rog completul de judecata a dosarului 14277/231/2015 sa retina


magnitudinea incompetentei asa-zisilor medici legisti care urmaresc vatamarea mea psihica si fizica prin
injectarea cu substante toxice, dar ma declara lipsit de discernamant in acest scop, ceea ce nu este in
interesul lor ilicit fiindca lipsa de discernamant nu poate fi tratata medicamentos ci se adreseaza prin
incarcerare daca persoana lipsita de discernamant a savarsit o infractiune si evident din lipsa din
discernamant prezinta pericolul de a recidiva. Compar acest demers analogic cu existenta unei pastile
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 293 of 403

care vindeca retardarea mintala, ceea ce e o fantezie si demonstreaza ca asa-zisii medici legisti nu au
discernamant nici ca infractori, luand decizii impotriva propriilor interese ilicite. Mai mult, deoarece in
urma savarsirii tentative de Omor calificat si Vatamarea corporala savarsita de interlopul Herghelegiu
Danut impotriva mea pe 27.10.2014 si 05.12.2014, am studiat si arealul medicamentatiei psihiatrice
pentru a-mi alevia suferinta fizica si psihica, si am descoperit ca psihiatria este o pseudo-stiinta a mortii,
folosita in general ca arma impotriva intelectualilor sau ca instrument de frauda, ceea ce e mai putin
relevant decat faptul ca medicii psihiatri de pe mapamond habar nu au daca si cum functioneaza
medicamentatia pe care o prescriu, demonstrand prin aceasta ca psihiatria nu este o stiinta medicala
deoarece nu face uz de metoda stiintifica in privinta tratamentelor. Mi-am demonstrat aceasta realitate
involuntar scotand din sarite 80% din psihiatrii cu care m-am consultat, punandu-le in fata anatomia
creierului uman si dinamica neuroendocrinologica a creierului uman, de care asa-zisii psihiatri neavand
habar, si cerandu-le sa prescrie un tratament in functie de simptome si cei trei neurotransmitatori
fundamentali, serotonina, dopamina si noradrenalina, le-am trezit angoasa elevului prost prins la tabla
cu lectia neinvatata. Precizez ca unul din asa-zisii psihiatri din Comisia de expertiza medico-legala
psihiatrica a declarat convins a pshiatria n-are nici o legatura cu sistemul endocrin, ori de notorietate
existenta stiintei neuroendocrinologia probeaza aceasta legatura
Falsificarea raportului medico-legal psihiatric demonstreaza ca asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici
Silviu si complicii sai nu sunt debili mintal ci alienati mintal, adica sociopati sau cu tulburare antisociala
de persoanalitate, o forma constienta a psihopatiei criminale. Sociopatul este individul care incalca in
mod pervaziv legea si drepturile persoanelor, si care sacrifica vietile altora in scopul atingerii intereselor
sale ilicite, adesea meschine, ceea ce caracterizeaza pe asa-zisul medic legist Lucasievici Silviu si pe
complicii sai dispusi sa distruga viata altora in schimbul apartenentei la grupul infractional local, probat
flagrant prin falsificarea certificatului medico-legal psihiatric in schimbul musamalizarii dosarului
1863/P/2015 (829/P/2015) avand ca inculpati pe asa-zisi medici legisti Dicu Serban Dan si Ionescu
Natalia

Citez in dovedire literatura de specialitate privind alienarea mintala a asa-zisilor medici psihiatri
Lucasievici Silviu, Bezverhnii Igor, Florea Gabriela, Mihai Oana Georgiana, Luminita Grajdeanu si asa-zisul
organ de urmarire penala Mihaila Paul

5.1. Privind alienarea mintala sau sociopatia al asa-zisilor medici psihiatri si asa-zisul organ de
urmarire penala Mihaila Paul

1. a. Citez din DEX


ALIENÁT ~tă (~ți, ~te) și substantival Care suferă de o boală mintală; dement; nebun. Spital
de ~ți. [Sil. -li-e-] /<fr. aliéne, lat. alienatus
Sursa: NODEX (2002) | Adăugată de siveco | Semnalează o greșeală | Permalink

1. b. de la adresa
http://www.lapsiholog.com/tulburarea-de-personalitate-antisociala.html
citez: “
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 294 of 403

Tulburarea de Personalitate Antisociala este caracterizata printr-un tipar comportamental stabil de


violare si desconsiderare a drepturilor celorlalti. Acesta tulburare de personalitate a fost denumita, de
asemenea Psihopatie, Sociopatie sau Tulburare de Personalitate Dissociala.

Psiholog Ionut Ghiugan

1. c. privind
En. Antisocial Personality Disorder
Ro. Tulburarea antisociala de personalitate
de la adresa
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisocial_personality_disorder
citez “
Antisocial (or dissocial) personality disorder is characterized by a pervasive pattern of disregard for, or
violation of, the rights of others.

Traducere in romana:

Tulburarea antisociala de personalitate este caracterizata e un tipar pervaziv de ignorare a, sau violare a
drepturilor celorlalti.

1. d. privind
En. How to Deal With a Psychopath
Ro. Cum sa relationezi cu un sociopat
de la adresa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PNyVwA1ii4

1. e. privind
En. Profile of the Sociopath
Ro. Profilul sociopatului
de la adresa
http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html
citez: "
NOTE: In the 1830's this disorder was called "moral insanity." By 1900 it was changed to "psychopathic
personality." More recently it has been termed "antisocial personality disorder" in the DSM-III and DSM-
IV. Some critics have complained that, in the attempt to rely only on 'objective' criteria, the DSM has
broadened the concept to include too many individuals. The APD category includes people who commit
illegal, immoral or self-serving acts for a variety of reasons and are not necessarily psychopaths.

DSM-IV Definition
Antisocial personality disorder is characterized by a lack of regard for the moral or legal standards in the
local culture. There is a marked inability to get along with others or abide by societal rules. Individuals
with this disorder are sometimes called psychopaths or sociopaths.
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 295 of 403

Traducere in romana:

NOTA: in anii 1830 aceasta tulburare era denumita “nebunie morala”. In anii 1900 aceasta a fost
redenumita in “personalitate psihopata”. Mai recent aceata a fost denumita “tulburare antisociala de
personalitate” in categoriile DSM-III si DSM-IV (termenul provine din en. The Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), published by the American Psychiatric Association; ro. Manualul
diagnostic si statistic al tulburarilor mintale, publicat de Asociatia Americana de Psihiatrie). Unii critici s-
au plans ca, in incercarea de a se intemeia doar pe criterii “obiective”, DSM a largit conceptul pentru a
include prea multi indivizi. Categoria sociopatilor include indivizi care au comis fapte ilegale, imorale sau
egoiste pentru o varietate de motive si nu sunt neaparat psihopati.

Nota: criticile sunt declarate fara argumente stiintifice pe de o parte, pe de alta parte neavizate adica
nedocumentate in raport cu DSM, pentru ca “varietatea de motive” invocate de raufacatori reprezinta
rationalizarea raului facut, una din caracteristicile psihopatului/sociopatului

Definitia DSM-IV
Tulburarea de personalitate antisociala este caracterizata de o lipsa de observatie a standardelor morale
si legale ale culturii locale. Este observabila o inabilitate marcanta de a relationa cu altii si a se supune
regulilor societatii. Indivizii cu aceasta tulburare sunt uneori denumiti psihopati sau sociopati

5.2. Privind alienarea mintala sau schizofrenia al asa-zisilor medici psihiatri si a asa-ziselor
organe de urmarire penala

2. a. Citez din DEX


SCHIZOFRENÍE, schizofrenii, s. f. Boala mintala cronica caracterizata prin slabirea si destramarea
progresiva a functiilor psihice si prin pierderea contactului cu realitatea.

2. b. Citez din enciclopedia wikipedia


Schizophrenia ... is a mental disorder often characterized by abnormal social behavior and failure to
recognize what is real.

Traducere in romana:
Schizofrenia este o tulburare mintala caracterizata prin comportament social anormal si esecul
de a recunoaste ce este real.

Conform DSM-V "Schizophrenia is characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized


speech and behavior, and other symptoms that cause social or occupational dysfunction.". In traducere:
“Schizofrenia este caracterizata de iluzii, halucinatii, productie verbala si comportamentala
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 296 of 403

dezorganizata, si alte simptome ce cauzeaza disfunctie sociala si ocupationala”, precum in fapt a


demonstrat inculpatii acestui dosar penal prin “productie verbala si comportamentala dezorganizata”
adica prin falsificarea actelor de procedura de natura a-i incrimina penal adica reprezentand un pericol
nu doar pentru siguranta publica ci si pentru propria lor persoana, acestia fiind vadit lipsiti de
discernamant medical si juridic chiar si in calitate de infractori, precum calitatea de infractori sau de
sociopati adica indivizi cu tulburare antisociala de personalitate care incalca in mod pervaziv legea si
drepturile persoanelor evident constituie flagrantul necorespunderii profesionale a acestora sau
“disfunctie sociala si ocupationala”

In coroborare, precizez ca normalitatea comportamentului social civilizat este definita


conventional prin lege, care reprezinta normele societatii civilizate, si care este filosofia de viata a
oamenilor sanatosi mintal care se comporta normal din convingere spre diferenta de alienatii mintal
care se conformeaza comportamentului normal din frica de consecintele incalcarii legii. Convers,
incalcarea in mod pervaziv a legii si a drepturilor celorlalti constituie prin definitie sociopatia sau
tulburarea mintala sau de personalitate antisociala, care este o alta forma de alienare / debilitate
mintala ca schizofrenia

Asa-zisii medici psihiatri si asa-zisul organ de urmarire penala Mihaila Paul, au fost prinsi in
flagrant mintind obsesiv, incalcand legea si drepturile altor persoane, in scopul promovarii intereselor
ilicite ale crimei organizate din care fac parte, adica in cardasie si in apararea altor alienati mintal. Prin
definitie, incalcarea in mod pervaziv a legii si drepturilor altor persoane, constituie sociopatia sau
tulburarea antisociala de personalitate, o forma de alienare mintala. Mentionez ca proferarea obsesiva
de minciuni constituie una din caracteristicile sociopatului sau psihopatului, si se numeste mitomania
Fiindca asa-zisii medici psihiatri si asa-zisele organe de urmarire penala au fost prinse in flagrant
incalcand legea si drepturile celorlalte persoane, nu corespund profesional probat flagrant prin lipsa de
competenta profesionala si de bun simt chiar fiindca s-au incriminat penal, adica asa-zisii medici psihiatri
si asa-zisele organe de urmarire penala nu doar ca nu inteleg legea si obligatia de a o respecta, nu
intelege nici datoria de serviciu. Acestora le lipseste cu desavarsire si discernamantul sau intelegerea de
bun simt a normelor societatii civilizate, respectiv halucineaza ca prin minciunile prin care s-a incriminat
penal ca au reusit sa pacaleasca pe cineva
Fiindca prin definitie schizofrenicul este caracterizat prin pierderea contactului cu realitatea,
este astfel dovedit in flagrant ca asa-zisii medici psihiatri si asa-zisele organ de urmarire penala sunt
schizofrenice, deoarece au demonstrat lipsa de discernamant prin incalcarea pervaziva a legii si a
drepturilor persoanelor crezand ca nu vor fi prinsi in flagrant, prin aceasta evident reprezentand un
pericol atat pentru public cat si pentru propria lor persoana.

5.3. Privind mintitul patologic al asa-zisilor medici psihiatri si a asa-ziselor organe de urmarire
penala

De la adresa:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathological_lying
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 297 of 403

citez:

Pathological lying
Diagnosing pathological lying can be very difficult because it has not been recognized as a disorder in the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Many other disorders acknowledge pathological
lying as a symptom of disorders such as psychopathy, and antisocial, borderline, narcissistic, and
histrionic personality disorders, but people that are pathological liars may not possess characteristics of
the other disorders.[4] Excessive lying is a common symptom of several mental illnesses.

Traducerea in romana:

Mintitul patologic
Diagnosticarea mintitului patologic poate fi dificil deoarece nu este recunoscut ca o tulburare de
personalitate de sine statatoare in Manualul Diagnostic si Statistic al Bolilor Mintale. Multe dintre
celelalte tulburari mintale recunosc mintitul patologic ca o simptoma a psihopatiei, si a tulburarilor de
personalitate antisociale, borderline, narcisistica si histrionica, dar oamenii care sunt mincinosi
patologici nu prezinta neaparat celelalte caracteristici ale tulburarilor mintale. Mintitul excesiv este o
simptoma comuna a mai multor tulburari mintale.

De la adresa:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathological_lying
citez:

If the disease continues to progress, lying could become so severe as to cause legal problems, including
but not limited to fraud.

Traducerea in romana:

Daca boala mintala progreseaza, mintitul obsesiv poate cauza probleme cu legea, incluzand dar nefiind
limitate la frauda

II. In dovedire, solicit administrarea probei cu inscrisuri, pentru care:

A. Anexez si indic probele (pe care le combin intr-un singur fisier cu prezenta pentru a asigura
ordinea acestora la tiparire, cu mentiunea ca in cuprinsul fisierului pdf – accesibil cu ajutorul
butonului “Bookmarks” situat in programul Adobe Reader in bara utilitara verticala din stanga - isi
mentin denumirea):
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 298 of 403

1. cererea de eliberare a oricaror inscrisuri necomunicate de mine din dosarele 2845/P/2016,


3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 care atesta incalcarea pervaziva a dreptului meu la aparare garantat
constitutional cf. art. 24 din precum si cf. art. 11, art. 20 din CR si art. 6 din CEDO, ceea ce impune
constatarea ca inadmisibile a tuturor inscrisurilor ce nu mi s-au comunicat, inclusiv ordonantele de
inceperea, continuarea si punerea in miscare a actiunii penale ce deasemenea in mod explicit prin lege
se comunica si asa-zisele organe judiciare nu le-au comunicat pentru a manipula continutul dosarului
falsificand realitatea de fapt din aceasta
2. invoc ca proba materiala audio-video documentarul stiintific “Comercializarea nebuniei”, in
titlul original in engleza “The marketing of madness”, de la adresa:
2.1. https://vimeo.com/37790038 pentru partea I
2.2. https://vimeo.com/37808392 pentru partea II
Aceasta demonstreaza ca cel putin utilizarea psihiatriei impotriva unei persoane ca arma de
represiune nevoluntar adica fara consimtamantul acelei persoane constituie o incalcare grava si
flagranta a dreptului la viata cf. art. 2 din CEDO
3. invoc drept proba declaratiile mele judiciare din 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016,
precum si din 4791/231/2017 si 4909/231/2017, sustinute de martori, inregistrarile audio a sedintelor
de judecata, investigatia si probatoriul depuse cu titlul de plangere penala prealabila impotriva acelorasi
asa-zise organe judiciare si alti functionari care au falsificat procedurile si documentele din 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016, organe judiciare care sunt astfel incompatibile sa instrumenteze aceste
dosare cf. art. 11 din OUG 27/2002 pentru ca si-au musamalizat propriile infractiuni
Cu precizarea ca am propus martorii mei care n-au fost audiati in 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si
4329/P/2016 deoarece asa-zisele organe judiciare au sperat ca alienatii mintal din puscarie, sau dintre
complicii lor avocati si jandarmi pe care i-au numit martori sa ma incrimineze cu ceva in schimbul
promisiunii de foloase necuvenite, acestia demonstrand doar ca sunt alienati mintal, acuzandu-ma de
alte aberatii exprimandu-se generic si contrazicandu-se cu proba materiala audio a inregistrarilor de
sedinta, demonstrand iarasi astfel ca sunt nevinovat precum atesta toate situatiile de fapt din dosar
adica refuzul organelor judiciare de a consemna, administra si obiectiva probatoriul indiferent ca pentru
aparare sau acuzare, incalcarea oricarei logici prin faptul ca este imposibil sa tulburi linistea ascultand la
casti precum este experimental si cu martori dovedit in dosar precum nimeni n-a declarat ca a auzit ceva
din castile mele tocmai fiindca nu se putea auzi nimic, si este imposibil sa savarsesc gesturi si cuvinte de
ocara deoarece precum am declarat pe propria raspundere eu niciodata nu savarsesc gesturi si cuvinte
de ocara in public, in special fiindca sunt integrat social spre diferenta de “organele judiciare” criminale,
asimiland legea ca pe o comanda sociala interioara
4. invoc drept proba declaratiile mele judiciare din 2417/P/2014, 10547/231/2015,
11224/231/2015 si 14277/231/2015, precum si celelalte inscrisuri depuse de mine in aceste dosare
demonstrand activitatea criminala a mafiei magistratilor din Vrancea, Galati si Bucuresti, relevanta
acestora fiind demonstratia motivatiei si oportunitatii acestor criminali de a falsifica dosarele penale
2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 impotriva mea pentru a savarsi gravele
abuzuri din dosarele 10547/231/2015 (-4791/231/2017), 11224/231/2015 (-4909/231/2017),
14277/231/2017 (-12718/231/2017)
5. fisierul “contestatie fisa de externare.pdf” reprezentand demonstratia detaliata a falsificarii
fisei de externare care nu justifica otravirea mea cu otrava Invega pe baza de fluo ci probeaza
Vatamarea mea corporala in mai multe moduri adica faptul ca nu a existat diagnostic pana pe data de
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 299 of 403

08.06.2017 ca sa fiu otravit, nu a existat intrunirea Comisiei de etica si consimtamantul meu sa fiu
otravit, nu a existat nici o justificare factuala ca sa fiu otravit, examinarile nu se justifica si se contrazic
intre ele s.a.m.d.

B. Declar pe propria raspundere, cunoscand dispozitiile


- art. 326 Cod penal cu privire la Falsul in declaratii
- art. 322 Cod penal privind Falsul în înscrisuri sub semnătură privata
- art. 268 Inducerea în eroare a organelor judiciare
ca cele declarate in prezenta reprezinta adevarul

C. Proba veritatii.
- nu s-a efectuat sesizarea din oficiu privind falsurile in declaratii, adica proba veritatii
declaratiilor mele este facuta
- nu s-a efectuat sesizarea din oficiu privind inducerea in eroare a organelor judiciare, adica
proba veritatii probelor mele este facuta

01.10.2017

X
Raneti Tudor Andrei
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 300 of 403

REFERAT
privind fisa falsificata de externare din 08.06.2017, constituind declaratie judiciara sau pe
propria raspundere sub semnatura privata digitala si electronica,

prin care demonstrez categoric ca nu exista nici un silogism sau inferenta categorica care
determina stiintific diagnosticele “tulburare psihotica acuta predominant deliranta - tulburare de
personalitate paranoida (premorbid), expertizare medico-legala ceruta de autoritati” deoarece nu exista
faptele implicit logica din care sa reiasa acest diagnostic, discutand asupra fisei de externare si inferand
obiectivat in incheiere cum aceste diagnostice sunt false, precum internarea mea nevoluntara constituie
infractiunea de Supunerea la rele tratamente si Vatamarea corporala

1. fisa externare: "internat nevoluntar ... si evaluarii starii psihice actuale, fiind adus de Organele
de politie" este un fals prin omisiune, evident neexistand nici o prevedere legala sau un temei in acest
sens adica fapta de care sa fi fost acuzat pentru a conduce la suspiciunea alienarii mele mintale actuale
si necesitatea internarii mele nevoluntare la psihiatrie, in realitate fiind adus de politie la dispozitia
procurorului care a pus in executare hotararea ilegala a Judecatoriei Focsani 4909/231/2017 incalcand
cel putin prevederile art. 184 din Codul de procedura penala cum ar fi faptul ca nefiind suspect sau
acuzat de omor sau pruncucidere nu pot fi supus masurilor de siguranta psihiatrice cu atat mai mult cu
cat cf. art. 4 (2) din CPP privind prezumtia de nevinovatie orice indoiala se interpreteaza in favoarea
suspectului sau acuzatului. De mentionat ca pe 27.05.2017 am fost retinut de la niste examene la
facultatea de drept pe care “Organele de politie" nu m-au lasat sa le dau si la care acum am restanta
In realitate pe data de 18.05.2016 (doua mii saisprezece) ma aflam in sala de judecata ascultand
carti audio de pe telefonul mobil timp de o ora si jumatate cand "magistratii" m-au acuzat de
infractiunea de Incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei prin aceasta, facandu-mi dosar penal in care sunt vadit
nevinovat deoarece nu am fost trimis in judecata in 30-60 de zile conform Legii 304/2004, dosar prin
aceste "organele judiciare" au falsificat actele de procedura ale internarii mele nevoluntare incalcand
art. 184 din Codul de procedura penala si alte legi pentru o "expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica"
imposibila sau care nu poate avea loc in conditiile legii deoarece nu consimt sa fiu intervievat de un
psihiatru cf. art. 184 din Codul de procedura penala si art. 10 si art. 11 din Legea 487/2002, precum
Comisia nu a avut decat consimtamantul meu viciat pe data de 08.06.2017 si nu in scris, informat si
documentat, lipsind deasemenea orice reprezentant de la audiere ceea ce era obligatoriu conform legii
135/2010, art. 184 (3) si legii 487/2002, art. 11
Cf. art. 122 din Regulamentul de ordine interioara al Socola Iasi care este identic cu toate
regulementele din tara fiind act normativ, facand abstractie de faptul ca orice expertizare psihiatrica
este imposibila fara consimtamantul (sincer) al intervievatului cf. art. 11 din Legea 487/2002, expertiza
este oricum valida doar la momentul expertizarii, ori fiindca asa-zisele expertize in lipsa mea adica false
sunt oricum datate la jumatate respectiv peste un an de la data cand s-au inscenat dosarele
2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 adica 18.05.2016 si 24.06.2016, expertizele
mai presus de orice dubii rezonabile sunt falsificate precum sunt ilegale din motivele invocate dar
abstractizate din argument
Deoarece a trecut peste un an intre presupusa fapta care evident n-am savarsit-o, nu se justifica
urgenta internarii mele nevoluntare, precum nu exista nici o motivare a urgentei deoarece nu exista,
aceasta constituind proba a gravului abuz criminal la care am fost supus in scopul Vatamarii mele
corporale
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 301 of 403

Deoarece nu se justifica urgenta internarii mele nevoluntare si nu exista nici o fapta care sa
ridice suspiciunea alienarii mele mintale, nu se justifica detinerea mea ilegala in salonul de urgenta doua
zile unde persoane cu probleme mintale urlau si faceau odihna mea imposibila, precum nu se justifica
necesitatea injectarii mea cu antipsihoticul haloperidol, precum si cu diazepam, deoarece nu am suferit
nici o psihoza, ceea ce constituie infractiunile de Supunerea la rele tratamente si Vatamarea corporala
deoarece antipsihoticele este documentat ca provoaca leziuni pe creier si desi am raportat ca-mi este
rau avand frisoane si tremurand incontrolabil de la aceste injectii, acelasi “medic specialist” adica un
tanar fara stiinta si experienta pe nume Puiu ? a ordonat sa fiu injectat din nou
Deoarece nu se justifica internarea mea nevoluntara, nu exista fapta nici suspiciunea legitima
care sa determine masura de siguranta, si deoarece scopul pseudolegal al internarii mele era
expertizarea mea psihiatrica nu Supunerea la rele tratamente, Vatamarea corporala prin obligarea mea
sa iau drogul neurotoxic Invega pe baza de fluor fara consimtantul meu si fara consultarea Comisiei de
etica cf. art. 43 din Legea 487/2002, nu se justifica supunerea mea la “tratament” cu neurotoxina Invega
care conform prospectului trateaza schizofrenia cu care nu am fost diagnosticat, in realitate neavand nici
un diagnostic cand am fost obligat viciindumi-se consimtamantul sa iau Invega, ceea ce mi-a cauzat mai
multe probleme de sanatate cum ar fi in ordinea celor mai grave mi-a creat tulburarea capacitatii de a
invata, memora si gandi, depresie, anhedonia, o stare de angoasa / atac de panica si teroare (asociata cu
obligarea mea constanta sa iau aceasta otrava si detinerea mea ilegala la psihiatrie in proximitatea altor
persoane cu probleme psihice si posibil alte probleme de sanatate), uscaciune in gura si gat si inhibarea
sistemului imunitar ceea ce mi-a dat rosu in gat, uscaciune si mancarime la ochi, dureri de spate.
Afectarea capacitatii mele de a invata, memora, gandi, depresia, anhedonia si atacurile de panica au
persistat dupa externare deoarece drogul Invega actioneaza o lunga perioada de vreme

2. contentia de necesitate si injectarea cu haloperidol si diazepam a fost ilegala si netemeinica


deoarece conform normelor de aplicare a Legii 487/2002 nu am fost avertizat verbal cf. art. 7 din norme
speciale de ingrijire din ORDIN privind Normele de aplicare a Legii sănătăţii mintale şi a protecţiei
persoanelor cu tulburări psihice nr. 487/2002 “Imobilizarea este precedată de aplicarea unor tehnici de
abordare verbale care să evite escaladarea agresivităţii şi violenţei. Se va evita atitudinea de confruntare
cu pacientul, se va vorbi pacientului pe un ton calm, neutru şi cu o expresie facială atentă, dar neutră, cu
o gestică limitată, lentă fără schimbări bruste de atitudine.” ca daca refuz sa ma schimb in pijamale,
revendicandu-mi si dreptul de a-mi folosi telefonul cf. art. 68 (1) b) din Legea 487/2002 "accesul la
corespondenta personala si utilizarea telefonului in scop privat" si alte efecte personale, voi fi legat si
injectat, ceea ce iarasi este ilegal conform normelor de aplicare a Legii 487/2002 deoarece in realitate
am fost "educat" in batjocura ca daca nu ma conformez internarii, tratamentului si in general vointei
vadit de rea-credinta prin incalcarea legilor a personalului sectiei, voi fi legat si injectat. In acest sens mi
s-a viciat si consimtamantul de catre medicul curant Barbarosie sa dau o declaratie cum ca sunt de acord
cu toate acestea dandu-mi-se de inteles ca indiferent daca dau declaratia sau nu, voi fi oricum detinut in
regim de internare psihiatrica involuntara ilegal, si voi fi oricum supus la tratament ilegal, si oricum se va
contraface expertiza ilegal, declaratie pe care am completat-o ulterior ca oricum sunt obligat sa suport
abuzurile indicand o parte din legile incalcate precum mi-am putut aduce aminte deoarece nu mi s-a
adus la cunostinta regulamentul interior si legea ceea ce deasemenea era obligatoriu
Mai mult, am fost injectat a doua zi cu diazepam fara nici un motiv, cand am raportat ca mi-e
rau de la injectia precedenta. A treia oara cand am raportat ca mi-e rau, mi s-a administrat a treia
injectie cu "nospa"? si inca o pastila necunoscuta, nedocumentate in raportul de externare, starea de
rau persistand si toata ziua de luni 29.05.2017 in timpul audierii comisiei spitalului care a admis ilegal
internarea mea nevoluntara incalcand art. 184 (1, 3) din Legea 135/2010 si mai multe articole ale legii
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 302 of 403

487/2002 inclusiv nemotivat prin faptul ca motivarea sa fiu internat nevoluntar deoarece refuz sa fiu
expertizat nu este o motivare valida

Conform art. 8 din Normele de aplicare a Legii sănătății mintale și a protecției persoanelor cu tulburări
psihice nr. 487/2002, din 15.04.2016

"(1) În cazul în care toate intervențiile terapeutice uzuale folosite pentru a salva de la un pericol real și
concret viața, integritatea corporală sau sănătatea pacientului sau a unei alte persoane eșuează, se
poate recurge la restricționarea libertății de mișcare a pacientului prin mijloace specifice protejate.
(2) Măsurile specifice protejate vor fi aplicate pe principiul minimei restricții, proporțional cu gradul de
pericol.
(7) Pe perioada dispunerii măsurii izolării, pacientul va păstra îmbrăcămintea, precum și orice articole de
uz personal sau cu semnificație religioasă, cu excepția situațiilor în care păstrarea acestora ar putea
afecta siguranța proprie sau a personalului medical."

Evident pastrarea imbracamintei este legala


Evident faptul ca am refuzat sa-mi pun pijamaua constituie zero grad de periculozitate, si
contentionarea si injectarea nu a condus decat la vicierea consimtamantului meu prin supunerea la rele
tratamente

3. fisa externare: “hiperprosexie” (DEX: "Concentrare exagerată a atenției") pe tema juridica


este un fals deoarece am fost intrebat motivul pentru care ma aflu internat nevoluntar, care este de
natura juridica - vezi punctul 1. In plus sunt student la drept iar aceasta opinie a psihologului /
psihiatrului se datoreaza si faptului ca n-are discernamant juridic si considera pe cei care au
discernamant ca “exagereaza”

4. fisa externare: "hipermnezie" (DEX: "Excitație excesivă, patologică a memoriei") este un fals
deoarece nu-mi aduc aminte nimic din expertiza care sa indice aceasta "Excitație excesivă" precum
niciodata nu infatisez asa ceva, nici nu recunosc in hipermnezie un simptom al unor boli psihiatrice
avand literatura de specialitate psihiatrica la dispozitie prin internet, despre care precizez ca exista
interviuri date presei de psihiatri care recunosc ca nu exista boli psihiatrice macar

5. fisa externare: "idei delirante (adica false) de urmarire (adica penala), prejudiciu, persecutie
(DEX: "Urmărire nedreaptă și perseverentă a cuiva")..." este un fals, fiind evident ca am fost prejudiciat
prin internarea mea nevoluntara care e nelegala dar si netemeinica, care este un act de procedura
penala (la propunerea autoritatilor), precum este evident si ca sunt urmarit penal si persecutat prin acte
de procedura penala ilegale si netemeinice precum am demonstrat in dosarul penal dar si verbal prin
evidenta faptului ca sunt acuzat ca am ascultat carti audio la casti, “magistratii” inferand in scris ca am
tulburat linistea in mod silentios ceea ce demonstreaza ca am fost acuzat nedrept, si ceea ce constituie
infractiunea de Represiunea nedreapta, Cercetarea abuziva si alte infractiuni
In realitate fara stiinta mea chiar am fost urmarit ilegal si netemeinic de Biroul de investigatii
criminale care trebuia sa denunte autoritatilor penale pe “organele judiciare” care au falsificat dosarele
ANNEX 20 / ECHR Page 303 of 403

2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 precum si 10547/231/2015 (-4791/231/2017),


11224/231/2015 (-4909/231/2017), 14277/231/2017 (-12718/231/2017)

6. fisa externare: "aprosodie" sau (DEX: "monotonie a vorbirii, în timpul bolii lui Parkinson, în
schizofrenie sau epilepsie") este un fals, deoarece nu am vorbit monoton, desi precizez ca inca imi era
rau de la injectiile cu haloperidol si diazepam care mi-au cauzat cel putin tremur muscular in primele zile
ceea ce m-a traumatizat in conjunctura cu internarea mea in salonul de urgenta unde cel putin 2
pacienti urlau in permanenta, situatie ce am suportat-o primele zile

7. fisa externare: "cverulent" = revendicativ = plangaret conform DEX. In realitate, "autoritatile"


se plang ca le denunt in conditiile legii abuzurile grave savarsite impotriva mea. Tot in realitate doar
coruptii au acest gen de dispret fata de "turnatori", si tot in realitate exercitarea drepturilor este un
lucru normal in statul de drept Romania, chiar si in practica majoritatea supunandu-se legii

8. fisa externare: "ostilitate, rigiditate, deficit de modulare afectiva" este un fals in contextul
examinarii psihologice din 29.05.2017 cand am fost cooperant si sociabil. In realitate am declarat inca de
la examinarea comisiei spitalulului care a admis nelegal internarea mea nevoluntara ca sunt constient
prin relatii ca se incearca a mi se da o lectie adica se incearca santajarea mea sa nu mai fac plangeri
impotriva abuzurilor “autoritatilor” impotriva mea, si am promis ca nu mai fac plangeri aflandu-ma in
fata santajului implinit prin detentia in regim psihiatric si supunerea mea la rele tratamente

9. fisa externare: "grafomanie"(DEX: "Tendință patologică de a scrie mult și fără rost") este un
fals fiindca n-am scris absolut nimic la aceasta examinare, si daca se refera la faptul ca am facut multe
plangeri precizez ca am castigat spre exemplu in dosarele 43961/3/2009 prin care m-am reintegrat in
munca anuland o concediere nelegala si netemeinica, 11224/231/2015 anuland internarea nevoluntara
nelegala si netemeinica sau 14277/231/2015 anuland obligarea la tratament medical nelegala si
netemeinica si altele, avand asadar dovezi multiple ca pledarea in apararea drepturilor mele nu este o
"Tendință patologică de a scrie mult și fără rost"

10. fisa externare: "hiperbulie legata de