20 vues

Transféré par Ali Azgar

- Unit1_DimensionalAnalysis
- johnsen darelle c
- 1-s2.0-S0375960198007336-main
- Investigation of Motions
- Lecture.11
- Dimensional Analysis
- MIT8_04S13_ps10_sol
- MIT8_04S13_ps9_sol
- MIT8_04S13_ps6_sol
- ISC Physics Syllabus
- MIT8_04S13_ps5_sol.pdf
- QuestionsExamPrepSolutions.pdf
- MIT8_04S13_ps4_sol
- Roi Baer, Kenneth Lopata and Daniel Neuhauser- Properties of phase-coherent energy shuttling on the nanoscale
- MIT8_04S13_ps8_sol
- Waves Final
- 2-Blackbody
- RPT-FIZIK
- Nano Materials
- Extra waves test

Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 26

Problem 1. (10 points) Wave-riding Mechanics

(a) (4 points) Given a dispersion relation (k), the phase velocity vp is dened as

vp , (1)

k

and is the rate at which a single plane wave (i.e. a single k-mode) moves within a

wavepacket. The group velocity vg , on the other hand, is dened as

vg , (2)

k

and is the rate at which the envelope, or the pattern of a wavepacket moves1 . Note

that both are in general functions of k.

For gravity waves2 , the dispersion relation is given by

= gk tanh(kd). (3)

The open ocean is deep, so kd , and tanh(kd) 1. This means kg, and so

g

vp (4a)

k

1 g

vg . (4b)

2 k

In deep water, the phase velocity is thus twice as quick as the group velocity.

(b) (3 points) From the dispersion relation (Equation 3), we see that as waves approach

the beach (i.e. as d decreases), the angular velocity decreases. Furthermore, as

one approaches

the beach d gets small, so tanh(kd) kd and k gd. This gives

vg gd, which gets smaller as d gets smaller. Putting all this together, we see

that the front of the envelope of the wavepacket slows down as the individual plane

waves farther behind (i.e. still in deeper water) continue to move at a fairly quick rate.

In other words, the dierence between vf and vg changes. This causes the waves to

scrunch up at the front of the envelope and the height of the waves to increase (since

the total volume of water must remain constant). So the fact that waves appear to get

taller as they approach the beach is not just an illusion. Eventually, the heights of the

waves increase to such a point that nonlinearities set in, and the waves break.

1

Highly recommended To get a feel for the distinction between phase and group velocities, check out

http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/more stu/Applets/sines/GroupVelocity.html. The applet is

designed so that the phase velocity is always 1. Try setting the group velocity to be below, equal, or above

the phase velocity.

2

Not to be confused with gravitational waves, which are ripples in spacetime.

(c) (3 points) The surfers impression is accurate. Individual plane waves advance through

the envelope of a wavepacket quickly at rate of the phase velocity, but then die down

in amplitude as they approach the front of the envelope in order to maintain the en

velopes shape, which advances slowly at rate of the group velocity. To see an extreme

case that illustrates this point, set the group velocity to zero in the applet cited in the

footnote to part (a). One sees that at the nodes of the envelope, the individual plane

waves die down completely.

From the applet and the discussion above, we know that individual plane waves inter

fere to reach their maximum amplitude in the mid-section of a wavepackets envelope.

As the wavepacket advances, it retains the shape of its envelope, so an observer stand

ing at a xed location experiences alternating groups of big (large amplitude) waves

and small (small amplitude) waves.

8.04 Spring 2013 February 21, 2013

Problem 2. (10 points) Why I Dont Play Craps

(a) (3 points) Since a fair die is equally likely to give s from 1 to 12, one intuitively

expects to get

(s) = 6.5. (5)

This is correct, but it pays to set things up a little more formally so that we can

practice some of the techniques that will be useful when doing quantum problems.

The denition of (s) is

(s) = s P(s). (6)

s

3

For a fair die, P(s) is equal to 1/12 for s = 1, 2 . . . 12, so

8

1 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10 + 11 + 12

(s) = s= = 6.5. (7)

8 s=1

12

s2 ((s (s))2 ), (8)

and s to be s = s2 (i.e. s2 should be thought of as (s)2 and not (s2 )).

One way to tackle this problem would be to evaluate s2 by brute force:

s2 = (s (s))2 P(s). (9)

s

4

However, we saw in lecture that

s2 = (s2 ) (s)2 . (11)

3 1 12

A more sophisticated way to write P(s) would be to say P(s) = 12 i=1 (s i). Graphically, this would

look like eight innitely thin spikes centered on s = 1, 2 . . . 12, which is just a way of saying that any given

throw of the die will give some integer from 1 to 12 and nothing in-between. (The expectation value, being

like an average, is allowed to take on non-integer values). Using this sort of formalism, the expectation values

are integrals, which more closely resembles the sorts of expectation values that we deal with in quantum

I 1

I e 12 a

mechanics. For example, when nding (s), we have (s) s P(s)ds = 12 s i=1 (s i) ds =

eI a

1 12 1 12

12 i=1

s (s i)ds = 12 i=1 i, which is the same as Equation 6. Note that our P(s) satises the

usual properties required for probability

I distribution functions, such as being positive everywhere and being

properly normalized to one (i.e. P(s)ds = 1).

4

As a reminder: s2 ((s (s))2 ) = (s2 2s(s) + (s)2 ) = (s2 ) 2(s(s)) + ((s)2 ). If youre not convinced

that (a + b) = (a) + (b), try writing out the expectation value integral explicitly. Now, unlike s, there is

nothing random about (s) its simply a number. This means that any (s)s coming sailing out of the

(. . . )s, so that (s(s)) = (s)(s) = (s)2 and ((s)2 ) = (s)2 , giving

p

s2 = (s2 ) 2(s)2 + (s)2 = (s2 ) (s)2 s = (s2 ) (s)2 . (10)

Thus, all that remains is for us to work out (s2 ), which we can do in a similar way to

the manipulations in Equation 7:

12

1 X 2 325

(s2 ) = s = . (12)

12 s=1 6

s = 3.45. (13)

(c) (4 points) Let st represent the total number of spots shown by the two dice, and let

s1 and s2 be the number of spots shown by the rst and second die respectively. By

denition, st = s1 + s2 , so

Computing st is a little trickier. To avoid writing square root signs, lets consider

s2t . We start by using the shortcut we found in Equation 10:

= (s21 + 2s1 s2 + s22 ) (s1 )2 2(s1 )(s2 ) (s2 )2

= (s21 ) + 2(s1 s2 ) + (s22 ) (s1 )2 2(s1 )(s2 ) (s2 )2 . (15)

Now, because the two die throws are independent, the joint probability P(s1 , s2 ) of

obtaining s1 for the rst die and s2 for the second die is P(s1 )P(s2 )5 . we have

X X X X

(s1 s2 ) = s1 s2 P(s1 , s2 ) = s1 s2 P(s1 )P(s2 ) = s1 P(s1 ) s2 P(s2 ) = (s1 )(s2 ),

s1 ,s2 s1 ,s2 s1 s2

(16)

which means our expression for s2t reduces to

1 ) (s2 ) = 2s , (17)

where s refers to the spread dened for the single die throw analyzed in part (b).

This gives

st = 2s2 = 4.88. (18)

5

Please excuse the sloppy notation P(s1 , s2 ) is of course not the same function as P(s). After all,

P(s1 , s2 ) has two inputs while P(s) only has one.

st = N s2 , (19b)

st 1 s

= . (20)

(st ) N (s)

Now, suppose we forget about the dice and think about s as the result of some experi

mental measurement. Because of experimental uncertainties, the measurement comes

with some error s, and s/(s) is the percentage error on the measurement. What

Equation 20 tells us is that if we repeat the measurementover and over again and

average our results, the percentage error will go down as 1/ N .

Note that this behavior depends crucially on Equation 16, which was a result of each

die throw/measurement being independent. Intuitively, whats happening is that with

independent random errors, each individual measurement may be too high or too low,

but on average the measurements will be high half the time and low the rest of the

time. Thus, as more and more measurements are taken, the errors average down. On

the other hand, if the measurements are o because of some systematic bias (e.g. if

the measurements are always too high because of some instrumental miscalibration)

then the errors do not average down. This is why physicists work so hard to eliminate

sources of systematic error in their experiments.

8.04 Spring 2013 February 21, 2013

Problem 3. (5 points) Dimensions of

(x) |2 dx ,

dP (x) =

(21)

x is equal with the probability density | (x) |2 times the innitesimal interval. Since

a probability is a dimensionless quantity, [P] = 1, we have:

1

1 = [ (x)]2 L [ (x)] = (22)

L

2

dP (k) =

(k)

dk. (23)

Recalling that k was dened as k = 2 , we see that [k] = L1 , so we can follow the same

reasoning as above to get,

2 1

1 =

(k)

(k) =

L. (24)

8.04 Spring 2013 February 21, 2013

Problem 4. (15 points) Fourier Transforms and Expectation Values

(p) = (x) p (x) dx, (25)

where the hat on p emphasizes the fact that p is an operator and not a number. An

immediate consequence of this is that except for in certain special cases, we cant swap

the order of the terms in Equation 25, i.e. (x) p (x) = 6 p (x) (x). We can see

this explicitly for this particular problem by plugging in the form of the momentum

operator:

n

(p) = (x) (x) dx. (26)

i x

We can see that the derivative acts only on the second copy of , whereas if we had

written p (x) (x) it wouldve acted on the product of (x) and (x), which we

know gives a dierent result from the product rule in calculus.

Let us now proceed by substituting into Equation 26 the denition of the Fourier

transform:

1 iqx n 1

(p) = e (q)dq eikx (k)dk dx (27a)

2 i x 2

1

n ikx

= eiqx (q)dq e (k)dk dx (27b)

2 i x

1 n ikx

= (q)(k)eiqx e dx dq dk (27c)

2 i x

1 n ikx

= (q)(k) eiqx e dx dq dk. (27d)

2 i x

A lot happened in the last few lines, and here are some subtleties to be aware of:

In Equation 26, there are two copies of (x). When substituting these for their

Fourier space representations, it is crucially important to use dierent variables for

the Fourier variables (i.e. to not use k for both of them). To see this, recall that

the integrals are really just fancy summations with q or k as dummy summation

variables, and consider the following example,

P2 which serves as an analogy. PSuppose

were trying to nd the product of a i=1 i = 1 + 2 = 3 and b 2j =1 j 2 =

1 + 4 = 5. The answer is of course 15, but lets do this formally:

2 ! 2

! 2 X 2

X X X

2

ab = i j = ij 2 = 1 + 4 + 2 + 8 = 15. (28)

i=1 j=1 i=1 j=1

If we (incorrectly) use the same dummy index for the two summations, it is easy

to forget that were doing two sums, which leads to missing many of the terms in

the sum:

2 ! 2 ! 2

X X X

2

ab = i i ii2 = 1 + 8 = 9 (Wrong!) (29)

i=1 i=1 i=1

In going from Equation 27a to 27b, we brought the momentum operator and the

complex conjugate inside the Fourier integrals. This is allowed because dieren

tiation and taking the complex conjugate of something are both linear operations

acting on integrals, which are just sums. By denition, linear operations are ones

where the same answer is obtained regardless of whether we sum (i.e. integrate)

rst and then operate or operate rst and then sum.

In going from Equation 27b to 27c, we switched the order of integration. This is

allowed by Fubinis theorem (a purely mathematical result) thanks to the inde

pendence of our three integration variables x, q, and k.

In going from Equation 27c to 27d, (k) passed right through the derivative,

because it is a function of k and not of x.

Z Z Z

1

(p) = (q)(k)

eiqx ikx

nk e dx dq dk (30a)

2

Z Z Z

1

= (q)(k) nk

ei(kq)x

dx dq dk (30b)

2

" , .

=2(kq)

Z Z

= (q)(k) nk (k q)dq dk (30c)

Z

Z

which is our desired result. Note that Equation 30d is very similar in form to Equation

25, except we have k instead of x and instead of . This suggests that while the

momentum operator p takes the form of a derivative in real coordinate space, in Fourier

space it is simply a multiplicative operator.

(b) (5 points) The steps to follow are the same as in part (a), except for the operator p

Z

2

p = dx (x) in in (x) (31a)

x x

Z

2

= n 2

dx (x) 2 (x) (31b)

x

Z Z 2

Z

2 1 iqx 1 ikx

= n dx dqe (q) dke (k) (31c)

2 x2 2

n2

Z Z Z 2

iqx ikx

= dx dqe (q) dk e (k) (31d)

2 x2

n2

Z Z Z

iqx 2 ikx

= dx dqe (q) dk k e (k) (31e)

2

Z Z Z

2 2 1

= n dq (q) dkk (k) dx ei(kq)x (31f)

2

" ,

{z .

(kq)

Z

= dk|(k)|2 (nk)2 . (31g)

Again we see that the operator p becomes a multiplicative operator in the momentum

space.

(c) (5 points) We wish to prove that

Z

(f (p)) = |(k)|2 f (nk)dk. (32)

p2 ""

(f (p)) = (f (0) + pf " (0) + f (0) + . . . ) (33a)

2!

(p2 ) ""

= f (0) + (p)f " (0) + f (0) + . . . (33b)

2!

To evaluate this, we need to know how to work out expectation values of powers of

p, i.e. (pn ). One way to do this would be to go all the way back to p = ni x and

n

to nd (p ) by brute force, but an easier way would be to use our result from the

previous part. There, we showed that in Fourier space, the momentum operator takes

the simple form of multiplication by nk. It follows, then, that powers of p correspond

to powers of nk in Fourier space, which means

Z Z

" 2 1 ""

(f (p)) = f (0) + f (0) |(k)| nk dk + f (0) |(k)|2 (nk)2 dk + . . . (34a)

2!

Z 2

2 " (nk) ""

= |(k)| f (0) + nkf (0) + f (0) + . . . dk (34b)

2!

Z

= |(k)|2 f (nk) dk. (34c)

I as Equation 32, so our proof is complete. Note that we implicitly used

the fact that |(k)|2 dk = 1. This can be seen either as a mathematical statement

(Parsevals theorem from Fourier analysis), or a physical one (probabilities need to add

up to 1 whether we work in real space or Fourier space).

10

8.04 Spring 2013 February 21, 2013

Problem 5. (15 points) Delta Functions

(a) i. (1 point)

Z 1

(x + 2) (x3 3x2 + 2x 1) dx = (2)3 3(2)2 + 2(2) 1 = 25. (35)

3

ii. (1 point) Z

(x ) (cos(3x) + 2) dx = cos(3) + 2 = 1. (36)

0

iii. (1 points) Z 1

(x 2) e|x|+3 dx = 0, (37)

1

(b) i. (1 point)

Z Z

x (x)f (x) dx = 0f (0) = 0 = 0f (x) dx x(x) = 0. (38)

ii. (1 point)

Z Z

(x)f (x) dx = f (0) = (x)f (x) dx (x) = (x). (39)

Z Z e u a du Z

1 (x)

(cx)f (x) dx = (u)f = f (0) = f (x) dx. (40)

c c c c

If c < 0, then the limits of integration get swapped during the substitution, so

Z Z e u a du Z

1 (x)

(cx)f (x) dx = (u)f = f (0) = f (x) dx. (41)

c c c c

(cx) = x. (42)

|c|

iv. (1 point) This can be shown directly simply by letting f (x) (x):

Z

(a x)f (x b) dx = f (a b) = (a b). (43)

11

v. (1 point)

Z Z

(x a)f (x)g(x) dx = f (a)g(a) = (x a)f (a)g(x) dx (44a)

f (x)(x a) = f (a)(x a). (44b)

(c) For each of the proposed forms of the delta function, we essentially need to show that

Z

f (y)(y x) dy = f (x). (45)

Z

1

f (x) = eikx f(k)dk. (46)

2

Now suppose we substitute into this the formula for the Fourier transform, that

is, Z

1

f (k) = eikx f (x)dx. (47)

2

The result is

Z Z

ikx 1 iky

f (x) = e e f (y)dy dk. (48)

2

(Note the crucial renaming of the dummy variable in Equation 47 from x to y.

See the rst bullet point in the Problem 3 solutions for more details). Changing

the order of integration gives

Z Z

1 ik(xy)

f (x) = f (y) e dk dy, (49)

2

" , .

(xy)

our expression to Equation 45 (note that (xy) = (y x) from Part b ii above).

We can thus conclude that

Z

1

(x) = eikx dk. (50)

2

Z

1 x2 /a2

f (x) lim e dx = f (0). (51)

a0 a

Z

1 2 2

lim f (x) ex /a dx. (52)

a0 a

12

Z

1 2

lim f (ua) eu du. (53)

a0

The only remaining factor of a resides in f (ua), so we can simply take the limit

and say f (ua) f (0), which then comes out of the integral because it is now a

constant: Z

1 2

f (0) lim eu du = f (0), (54)

a0

where we have recognized that the integral is a standard Gaussian integral that

evaluates to 1. We have thus shown that Equation 51 is true and (x) =

2 2

lima0 a1 ex /a .

13

8.04 Spring 2013 February 21, 2013

Problem 6. (30 points) Qualitative Structure of Wavefunctions

(a) (8 points) Because these are the ocial electronic solutions, we have chosen to plot

these wavefunctions rather than sketch them. It is worth noting, however, that being

able to sketch a function in a qualitatively accurate way is an important skill, so

denitely get some practice if youre uncomfortable with it. (Remember, you wont

get to use your computer on exams!). In the plots below, we sketch the real part of the

wavefunction (x) in blue and the corresponding probability distribution |(x)|2 =

(x)(x) in red.

1 (x) = (x 1). Delta functions are innitely narrow and innitely tall, so they

cant really be plotted. Shown below is a Gaussian approximation (do Problem 6

c to see why this is sensible!).

20

15

10

!3 !2 !1 0 1 2 3

2 (x) = (x 2).

20

15

10

!3 !2 !1 0 1 2 3

14

Real part of the wavefunction: Re(3 (x)) = Re(eix ) = Re(cos x + i sin x) = cos x.

Probability distribution: |3 (x)|2 = 3 (x)3 (x) = eix eix = 1.

!10 !5 5 10

!1

!2

Real part of the wavefunction: Re(4 (x)) = Re(ei2x ) = Re(cos 2x + i sin 2x) =

cos 2x.

Probability distribution: |4 (x)|2 = 4 (x)4 (x) = ei2x ei2x = 1

!10 !5 5 10

!1

!2

5 (x) = (x 1) + (x 2).

20

15

10

!3 !2 !1 0 1 2 3

15

Real part of the wavefunction: Re(6 (x)) = Re(ei2x + eix ) = Re(cos 2x + i sin 2x +

cos x + i sin x) = cos 2x + cos x.

5

!10 !5 5 10

!1

!2

plotted in units of 0.1N .

120

100

80

60

40

20

!2 !1 1 2

(xx0 )2

8 (x) = N e a2

eik0 x . The x-axis is plotted in units of a, while the y-axis is

plotted in units of 0.1N , x0 = 1 and k0 = 2.

1.0

0.5

-2 -1 1 2

-0.5

-1.0

16

I

(b) (4 points) In each case we must nd (k) 1

2

(x)eikx dx.

I

1 (k) = 1

2

(x 1)eikx dx = 12 eik .

I

2 (k) = 1

2

(x 2)eikx dx = 12 ei2k .

I ix ikx I

3 (k) = 1

2

e e dx = 12 ei(1k)x dx = 2(k 1). (See Problem 6

if youre not sure where the last equality came from).

I I

4 (k) = 12 ei2x e ikx dx = 12 ei(2k)x dx = 2(k 2).

I

5 (k) = 1 2 ((x 1) + (x 2))eikx dx = 12 (eik + ei2k ).

I I

6 (k) = 12 (eix + ei2x )eikx dx = 12 ei(1k)x + ei(2k)x dx

= 2((k 1) + (k 2)).

I a/2

7 (k) = N2 a/2 e ikx dx = N 2 sin(ka/2)

k

.

I

2 2 2 2

a e i(kk0 )x0 e(kk0 ) a /4 .

2

Note that the operation of taking a Fourier transform is a linear one, so another way

to nd 5 and 6 wouldve been to compute 1 + 2 and 3 + 4 respectively.

(c) (4 points) Again, the real part of the wavefunction is in blue and the probability

distribution is in red:

1 (k) = 1 eik ,

2

so the real part is 1 cos k.

2

Probability distribution: |1 (k)|2 = 1 (k)1 (k) = 1 ik ik

2

e e = 1

2

.

1.0

0.5

!10 !5 5 10

!0.5

!1.0

1

At large k, P(k) 2

. From the formula obtained in Problem 4, this makes (p2 )

divergent.

17

2 (k) = 1 ei2k ,

2

so the real part is 1 cos 2k.

2

Probability distribution: |2 (k)|2 = 1 i2k i2k

2 (k)2 (k) = 2 e e = 1

.

2

1.0

0.5

!10 !5 5 10

!0.5

!1.0

Also in this case, since P(k) tends to a constant at large k, the integral for (p2 ) is

divergent.

3 (k) = 2(k 1).

20

15

10

!3 !2 !1 0 1 2 3

18

4 (k) = 2(k 2).

20

15

10

!3 !2 !1 0 1 2 3

5 (k) = 12 (eik + ei2k ), so the real part is 12 (cos k + cos 2k).

Probability distribution: |5 (k)|2 = 5 (k)5 (k) = 1

2

(ei2k + eik )(ei2k + eik ) =

1

2

(2 + eik + eik ) = 1 (1 + cos k).

1.0

0.5

!10 !5 5 10

!0.5

!1.0

6 (k) = 2((k 1) + (k 2)).

20

15

10

!3 !2 !1 0 1 2 3

19

uncertainty on p is nonzero.

7 (k) = N 2 sin(ka/2)

k

.

1.0

0.5

!20 !10 10 20

!0.5

!1.0

2

P(k) = N 2 sin (ka/2)

k2

, so, for large k, P(k) goes essentially like 1/k 2 , which tends

to zero too slowly to obtain a nite value of (p2 ):

Z Z

2 2

(p ) = dk(nk) P(k) dk sin2 (ka/2) = .

2 2

a ei(kk0 )x0 e(kk0 ) a /4 . The x-axis is in units of ka/2, while the y-axis

8 (k) = N 2

is in units of aN , x0 = 1 and k0 = 2.

1.0

0.5

-4 -2 2 4

-0.5

-1.0

2 a2 /4

In this case, P(k) e2(kk0 ) , and it tends to zero fast enough to get a nite

value of (p2 ).

(d) (6 points) In general, one should look for maxima in |(x)|2 to decide where it will

most likely be found. The expectation value (x) can be thought of as an average

position. With momentum, one repeats the same procedure but using |(k)|2 instead.

The narrower the peaks of these probability distribution functions, the more condent

we can be that the particles position and momenta are measured to be near their

most likely values.

20

Particle #1:

Momentum equally likely to take on any value, because |(k)|2 is constant.

Particle #2:

Will certainly be found at x = 2, because |(x)|2 = 0 everywhere else.

Momentum equally likely to take on any value, because |(k)|2 is constant.

Particle #3:

Particle equally likely to be found anywhere, because |(x)|2 is constant.

Momentum will certainly be nk = n, because |(k)|2 = 0 for all k 6= 1.

Particle #4:

Particle equally likely to be found anywhere, because |(x)|2 is constant.

Momentum will certainly be nk = 2n, because |(k)|2 = 0 for all k 6= 2.

Particle #5:

Particle will either be at x = 1 or x = 2, with equal probability

Momentum most likely p = 2nn, where n is any integer.

Particle #6:

Particle most likely to be found at x = 2n, where n is any integer.

Momentum will be either nk = n or nk = 2n with equal probability.

Particle #7:

Particle equally likely to be found anywhere between x = a/2 and x = a/2.

Momentum will most likely be zero, but there is considerable width to this

probability maximum, so measuring a value signicantly dierent from zero

would not be surprising.

Particle #8:

Particle most likely to be found at x = x0 , but peak is wide, so a spread in

measured position would not be surprising.

Momentum will most likely be at nk = nk0 , but peak is wide, so a spread in

measured momentum would not be surprising.

so properly normalized wavefunctions must satisfy

Z

1= |(x)|2 dx (55)

Z Z

r 14

2 2 2(xx0 )2 /a2 2 2

1= |(x)| dx = N e dx = N a N= . (56)

2 a2

21

(f) (4 points)

As noted above using symmetry, (x) = x0 and (p) = nk0 for 8 (x). If one wishes to be

formal, one can compute the integrals explicitly. For example, (x) for 8 (x) is given

by r

Z Z

2 2 2

(x) = 8 (x)x8 (x) dx = 2

e2(xx0 ) /a xdx = x0 . (57)

a

Z Z

a 2 2

(p) = 8 (k)nk8 (k) dk = e(kk0 ) a /2 nkdk = nk0 . (58)

2

p p

The uncertainties are given by x (x2 ) (x)2 and p (p2 ) (p)2 , so our

next step is to nd (x2 ) and (p2 ).

For 8 we have

r

a2

Z Z

2 2(xx0 )2

2

(x ) = 8 (x)x2 8 (x) dx = x2 e a2 dx = + x02 (59a)

a2 4

Z

a (kk0 )2 a2 n2

= n2 k 2 e 2 dk = 2 + (nk0 )2 , (59b)

2 a

saturates the Uncertainty Principle i.e. it is a minimum uncertainty wavepacket.

(g) (2 points) The position space wavefunction 8 (x) gets narrower and taller as a 0.

We thus expect x to tend to zero as this happens, which is conrmed by what we

found in part (f), where x a.

Conversely, the momentum space wavefunctions (k) get broader and atter, and p

tends to innity. This is again conrmed by the fact that with 8 , we have p 1/a.

22

8.04 Spring 2013 February 21, 2013

Problem 7. (15 points) Why the Wavefunction should be Continuous

(a) (7 points) The process here is exactly the same as what we did for parts (e) and (f)

of the Problem 6. First we nd N :

Z Z a/2

2 2 1

1= |7 (x)| dx = N dx = N 2 a N = . (60)

a/2 a

a/2

a2

Z Z

1

2

(x ) = 7 (x)x2 7 (x) dx = x2 dx = . (61a)

a a/2 12

p symmetry (work it out explicitly if youre skeptical!), we have x

(x2 ) (x)2 = (x2 ), and

x = . (62)

2 3

The spread x is thus smaller than the value we found for 8 in the previous problem.

Z a/2

r r

N ikx 2 sin(ka/2) 2 sin(ka/2)

7 (k) = e dx = N = . (63)

2 a/2 k a k

Z

2n2

Z

2 2 2 ka

(p ) = 7 (k)n k 7 (k) dk = sin2 dk = . (64)

a 2

To have a nite (p2 ), we need the integral in its corresponding formula to be convergent.

Since the integrand is a nonnegative function, we must require that, for large k,

C2

k 2 |(k)|2 ,

k 1+E

for some constants C and t. This implies, for large k,

C

|(k)| 3+E .

k 2

23

8.04 Spring 2013 February 21, 2013

Problem 8. (Optional) Smooth Wavefunctions give nite expectation values

(a) The following picture shows the plots of 7b (x) for b = 1, 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, and

a = N = 1. Note how, as b 0, the wavefunction approaches 7 (x).

From the picture we note that, for b << a, the area between the graph of 7b (x)/N

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

-2 -1 1 2

and the x-axis is approximately given by a rectangle centered at the origin of height 1

and width a.The same goes for the area between (7b (x)/N )2 and the x axis, and

thus N 1/ a.

know that the Fourier transform of tanh(x) is, up to a divergent constant

r

k

i csch . (65)

2 2

Because the Fourier transform is linear, and since we will subtract two tanhs, the

constants we are neglecting will cancel, so we can ignore them. From (65) we now

obtain the Fourier transform of tanh(Ax + B). Suppose f(k) is the Fourier transform

of f (x). The Fourier transform of f (Ax) is then

Z Z

1 ikx 1 y

dxe f (Ax) = dyeik A f (y) =

2

2|A|

Z

1 1

k

i A y 1 k

=

dye f (y) = f ,

|A|

2

|A| A

Z Z

1 ikx 1

dxe f (x + B) = dyeik(yB) f (y) =

2 2

24

Z

1

=e ikB

dyeiky f (y) = eikB f(k),

2

where we made the change of variable ye = xa+ B. Putting together these results, we

x+ a

nd that the Fourier transform of tanh b 2 is

r

ika kb

ie 2 |b| csch .

2 2

r r

N ika kb ika kb

7b (k) = ie 2 |b| csch ie 2 |b| csch =

2 2 2 2 2

|b| sin ka

r

2

=N ,

2 sinh kb

2

and since b > 0, this is the result we were expected to nd.

b2 sin2 ( ka )

|7b (k)|2 = N 2 |k|b

2

,

2 e

which means that |7b (k)|2 dies exponentially at innity, whereas we saw that |7 (k)|2

is precisely equal to zero out of a bounded domain. From the considerations made in

Problem 7 (b), we know that (p2 ) is certainly nite.

1 b2 sin2 ( ka )

Z

2

p dkk 2 2

2 kb =

a sinh ( 2 )

dy e y a2 1 b2 sin2 ( ya ) dy e y a2 1 b2 /2

Z Z

2b 1

= 2 y 2 y ,

b b a sinh ( 2 ) b b a sinh ( 2 ) ab

where we made the change of variable y = kb. Thus we conclude that

p .

ab

25

MIT OpenCourseWare

http://ocw.mit.edu

Spring 2013

For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.

- Unit1_DimensionalAnalysisTransféré parshyamsundarsr
- johnsen darelle cTransféré parapi-260450418
- 1-s2.0-S0375960198007336-mainTransféré pardtamp
- Investigation of MotionsTransféré parIzi Muh
- Lecture.11Transféré parRen-Bo Wang
- Dimensional AnalysisTransféré parVINAY CHANDWANI
- MIT8_04S13_ps10_solTransféré parYul Lope
- MIT8_04S13_ps9_solTransféré parYul Lope
- MIT8_04S13_ps6_solTransféré parYul Lope
- ISC Physics SyllabusTransféré parBharath Kkb
- MIT8_04S13_ps5_sol.pdfTransféré parRavi Roy
- QuestionsExamPrepSolutions.pdfTransféré parBowen Xu
- MIT8_04S13_ps4_solTransféré parYul Lope
- Roi Baer, Kenneth Lopata and Daniel Neuhauser- Properties of phase-coherent energy shuttling on the nanoscaleTransféré parNedsy8
- MIT8_04S13_ps8_solTransféré parYul Lope
- Waves FinalTransféré parDhanBahadur
- 2-BlackbodyTransféré parhermas67
- RPT-FIZIKTransféré parMohamad Taufiq
- Nano MaterialsTransféré parInz Mat
- Extra waves testTransféré parGhaleb Al Baz
- 22.3MB1lecturecourse.4Transféré parsayed Tamir jan
- Grade 7 Sample Test Items Grade 7 Science 3rd Quarter 25cnj75Transféré parGenesis Daquinan
- ass. in physics.docxTransféré parVhinaP.Hipolito
- Electromagnetic WavesTransféré parHafid Zainul
- SPM2005-06.wavesTransféré parLow Pei Yang
- 6.1 jawapanTransféré parsuemozac
- Presentation 1Transféré parMuhammad Raies
- NS2016.056.pdfTransféré parpaul505
- BbbTransféré parNandN
- Two Dimensional Motion and VectorsTransféré parSriram Arumugam

- Joins Based QueryTransféré parAli Azgar
- best fitTransféré parAli Azgar
- MS ExperienceTransféré parAli Azgar
- 2nd Day-sttp EngTransféré parAli Azgar
- Cleanliness is Indeed Next to GodlinessTransféré parAli Azgar
- Joins Based QueryTransféré parAli Azgar
- Set WshShellTransféré parRishabhDutt
- 3_MAC -1Transféré parAli Azgar
- 1610.04426Transféré parAli Azgar
- Aavartan FINALTransféré parAli Azgar
- Annual ReportTransféré parAli Azgar
- DBMS Assignment Lab3Transféré parAli Azgar
- 1992-1514710914Transféré parAli Azgar
- Agora_engTransféré parAli Azgar
- Fee Recipe tTransféré parAli Azgar
- Analytic FunctionsTransféré parFegason Fegy
- How to Think About ExponentialsTransféré parzikibruno
- Academic Calendar B.tech._B.arch._M.tech._MCA_Except Ist Sem. July to Dec 2016Transféré parAli Azgar
- 74HC_HCT42_CNVTransféré parAli Azgar
- 12 Rural EducationTransféré parEsha Singh
- MIT8_04S13_Lec01Transféré parYul Lope
- MIT8_04S13_ps1_solTransféré parAli Azgar
- MIT8_04S13_Lec08Transféré parYul Lope
- MIT8_04S13_Lec08Transféré parYul Lope
- MIT8_04S13_Lec08Transféré parYul Lope
- Academic Calendar Jan to June 2016Transféré parAli Azgar
- cauchyTransféré parflowh_
- Lab Exercises-3 ModifiedTransféré parAli Azgar
- MIT8_04S13_Lec02physicsTransféré parAnonymous 9kzuGaY

- Assignment 02 ShoubraTransféré parAya Hassan
- Cm Matlab ManualTransféré parClement Raj
- note10Transféré parPinjala Anoop
- BoothTransféré pargurbeer_sandhu_15
- 70261454-Beginning-Functional-Analysis.pdfTransféré parbmandar
- Maple_intro Solving Dynamics ProblemsTransféré parLeo Kuts
- Circles NOTESTransféré parjosephnachar
- geometry1-lect-7.pdfTransféré parGuto Gomes Gomes
- SPE-945228-G Arps Original 1945Transféré parelmacanonprieto
- linear algebraTransféré parsarveshknitk
- Z TansformTransféré parThe Aviator00
- FRvnPrbTransféré parJohn Chan
- Algorithmic Number Theory - S. Arun-Kumar.pdfTransféré parzolboo
- femh111Transféré parkritagyasharma29
- Chapter 10 - Eigenvalues and EigenvectorsTransféré parEnos Lolang
- Concepts in Calculus IIITransféré parcantor2000
- EE228 Learning Objectives_Midterm2Transféré parGustavo Alejandro Naranjo
- Ib2 Math Studies 2nd Term Paper 2 MsTransféré parJun Mendoza
- algebra of matrices.pdfTransféré parRonald Cario Seguin
- A New Way to Fuzzy H-ideals of HemiringsTransféré parmsmramansrimathi
- InversionsTransféré parKumar Nori
- CnvxOptTransféré parfifster
- math 1210 projectTransféré parapi-259451065
- lesson 9 7 complex numbersTransféré parapi-233527181
- Measure Theory in EconomicsTransféré paregievs
- Unit Test f1 Maths Ut 2Transféré parvishal110085
- Plane TrigoTransféré paredniel maratas
- NavierTransféré paredgar_sadika
- Matrix CookbookTransféré parAli Ghelmani
- 07-Using Fzerofzero and ApplicationsTransféré parMihir Ashar