IV Internal Verification of Assessment

Module Number: Module Name: Module Tutor Year/Term

Risk management Anuruddha Yapa 2017
BFIN5201
Assessment Title:
Case Study

MODULE
MODULE Weight IVs COMMENTS / LEADERS
ASSESSMENT % BRIEFING INCLUDES:
RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
STRATEGY
TAKEN

Case Study 50% Learning Outcomes

Description of
Exam 50%
Task/Problem/Topic

Assessment Criteria

Marking Criteria

Hand in Details

Length/Duration of
assessment

Guidance Notes

Feedback Sheet

Referencing
Total 100%
Requirements Given
Please check appropriate box below

I confirm that I have considered the above draft assignment/exam and I am happy to approve the content.
Assessment can now be sent to Learners
I confirm that I have considered the above draft assignment/exam and I am happy to approve the content
subject to the above amendments.
Assessment can be forwarded to the learners once the changes have been implemented and
verified.

I confirm that I have considered the above draft assignment/exam and suggest the above amendments.
I would like to see the final amended version before I confirm approval.

Name of the IV: Signature of the IV: Date:

Chameera Wijethunga
LEAD IV COMMENTS (IF REQUIRED) EXTERNAL EXAMINER COMMENTS (IF REQUIRED)
 Assignment Cover Sheet

Qualification Module Number and Title

HND in Business Management BFIN5201 Risk management

Student Name & No. Assessor

Mr. Anuruddha Yapa

Hand out date Submission Date

Assessment type Duration/Length of Weighting of Assessment

Case Study Assessment Type 50%
3000 words

Learner declaration

I, .<name of the student and registration number>,

certify that the work submitted for this assignment is my own and research sources are fully
acknowledged.

Marks Awarded
First assessor

IV marks

Agreed grade

Signature of the assessor Date

 FEEDBACK FORM
INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE OF BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY
Module: Risk Management

Student:

Assessor: Mr. Anuruddha Yapa

Assignment: Case study analysis

Strong features of your work:

Areas for improvement:

Marks Awarded:

Case study analysis

Learning outcomes covered
1. Understand the risk management as a process with risk governance
2. Be able to identify different types of risks such as financial and nonfinancial risks

Case Study 01
Source:
Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2011, Volume 6, Issue 2
Go through the case study of organizational risk management analyze how organizations implement risk
management policies and what are the impact of those implementations on different organization given in
the Brazilian market (25 marks)

Case Study 02
Source:
Governance of central bank, management on non-financial risks by Bruce White.
By using case study financial and none financial risk analyze different financial and non-financial risks
and how it effect on qualitative approach and reputation of the banking system (25 marks)
 Marking Scheme (Case study 01)

Use this grid to assess case study 01

20 - 25 Critical identification of risk management policies and impacts of it and a thorough discussion on
how the different types of organization use different financial policies. A quite exceptional and
outstanding piece of answer, providing insights, which is not been subject to repetition; this range is
distinguished by superior organization, economic use of language and totally comprehensive, given
the conditions of the question. Excellent understanding and application of the relevant financial
policies with no errors. The piece of work written very well with more than 5 valid support
documents according to Harvard referencing and proper reporting style.

15- Analyze risk management policies and impacts of it and a discussion on how the financial policies
19.99 making changes. But lacks the depth of the discussion. An answer which demonstrates a good
understanding of the relevant financial issues and of the complexity of the issues involved. There is
a sound basis of relevant factual knowledge and/or the theoretical issues involved. There is either
some measure on different organizations financial use and implications. Evidence of creativity,
critical approach, and wide reading, beyond the core subject matter and has been written very well
with 4 valid support documents according to Harvard referencing format and proper reporting style.

10 - Discuss on risk management policies and impacts of it which demonstrates a clear understanding of
14.99 the implication of the policies and grasp of the complexity of the issues involved. There is a sound
basis of relevant factual knowledge and/or of theoretical issues involved with valid argument present
to discuss the context with few significant errors. The issues involved are dealt with in a systematic
way. Certain report structural errors present in the report minimum of 3 support documents given in
the reference list according to the correct format

5 - 9.99 An answer which demonstrates an understanding of the basic question. There is a basis of factual
knowledge and/or of on risk management policies and impacts of it. Although, some errors present
in understanding the implications of the risk management. The overall framework of the answer is
sensible and accurate. The answer shows planning in its construction, with some basic applications
and a little or no development of argument present. Average competent performance, well presented,
demonstrating understanding of most of the essential issues. Report structural errors present.
Minimum of 2 other referencing material present in the report.

0 -4.99 An answer which demonstrates a limited understanding of the relevant question. There is some
relevant factual knowledge and/or awareness of the relevant theoretical issues on risk management
policies and impacts of it. A few significant errors present in writing. The answer is not well
planned, with little development of argument, and often much irrelevant discussion is present. Lacks
clarity of expression.
 Marking Scheme (Case study 02)

Use this grid to assess case study 02

20 - 25 Critical identification of financial and non-financial risk. A thorough discussion on how the different
types of quantitative approaches and reputation issues. A quite exceptional and outstanding piece of
answer, providing insights, which is not been subject to repetition; this range is distinguished by
superior organization, economic use of language and totally comprehensive, given the conditions of
the question. Excellent understanding and application of the relevant financial policies with no
errors. The piece of work written very well with more than 5 valid support documents according to
Harvard referencing and proper reporting style.

15- Analyze risk management policies and impacts of it and a discussion on how the financial and non-
19.99 financial risk effect. But lacks the depth of the discussion. An answer which demonstrates a good
understanding of the relevant quantitative approaches and reputations. There is a sound basis of
relevant factual knowledge and/or the theoretical issues involved. There is either some measure on
different organizations financial use and implications. Evidence of creativity, critical approach, and
wide reading, beyond the core subject matter and has been written very well with 4 valid support
documents according to Harvard referencing format and proper reporting style.

10 - Discuss on financial and non-financial risk which demonstrates a clear understanding of the
14.99 implication of the policies and grasp of the complexity of the issues involved. There is a sound basis
of relevant factual knowledge and/or of theoretical issues involved with valid argument present to
discuss the context with few significant errors. The issues involved are dealt with in a systematic
way. Certain report structural errors present in the report minimum of 3 support documents given in
the reference list according to the correct format

5 - 9.99 An answer which demonstrates an understanding of the basic question. There is a basis of factual
knowledge and/or on financial and non-financial risk. Although, some errors present in
understanding the qualitative approach and reputations. The overall framework of the answer is
sensible and accurate. The answer shows planning in its construction, with some basic applications
and a little or no development of argument present. Average competent performance, well presented,
demonstrating understanding of most of the essential issues. Report structural errors present.
Minimum of 2 other referencing material present in the report.

0 -4.99 An answer which demonstrates a limited understanding of the relevant question. There is some
relevant factual knowledge and/or awareness of the relevant theoretical issues on financial and non-
financial risk. A few significant errors present in writing. The answer is not well planned, with little
development of argument, and often much irrelevant discussion is present. Lacks clarity of
expression.
 Submission Guidelines

Submission format Report

Paper Size: A4
Words: 3000 words
Printing Margins: LHS; RHS: 1 Inch
Binding Margin: Inch
Header and Footer: 1 Inch
Basic Font Size: 12
Line Spacing: 1.5
Font Style: Times New Roman
Alignment: Justify
Referencing should be done strictly using Harvard system and in-text references are must to have in the report
Give more priority to book references
Invalid (non- academic) web sites are strictly prohibited