Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 7

Points to note while preparing your Abstracts for 4th WAC:

Create the soft copy of the draft in Microsoft word .doc file and save as a 1997-2003
word version. (.doc file)

Font to be used: Times New Roman

Alignment: Left

Line spacing: 1.5

Paragraph spacing: “after” 12 points

Highlight in yellow colour, your preference for presentation at the congress: whether the
abstract is to be considered for:
ORAL PRESENTATION OR POSTER PRESENTATION.

Title: Font size: 16 points. Format: Bold

The title should be clear and informative containing key elements of the covered topics.

Authors’ name: Font size: 12 points. Format: Normal, Italics (The lead authors name to
be the first, followed by the 2nd, 3rd or 4th author. The name of the Head of the institution /
project, if other than the lead author, could be added the last. Affiliations of each author
should be indexed and given together placed in the document after the references. Format
of names to be given : last name first followed by initials (for eg: S Sunil Kumar, to be
Kumar SS, G Sivarama Krishnan to be Krishnan GS, Mark Stuart to be Stuart M and
Mohammed Samshudeen to be Samshudeen M). The academic qualification / degrees of
the author need not be specified.

Key words: Font size: 12 points. Format: Normal. Please include key words of phrases
people might use in a search engine for finding papers in your category. Please limit your
search key words / phrases to not more than 5.

Disclaimers, and known / perceived conflict of interest, if any should be provided.


Contact information for corresponding authors. The name, mailing address, telephone
and fax numbers, and e-mail address of the author responsible for correspondence about
the manuscript (the “corresponding author;” this author may or may not be the
“guarantor” for the integrity of the study). The corresponding author should indicate
clearly whether his or her e-mail address can be published.

Body of the Abstract: Font Size: 12. Format: Normal

The Abstract body should not be more than 200 words.

Avoid introductory and general matters.

The abstract should contain enough information about the proposed paper to enable the
scientific committee to evaluate it. Structured abstracts are preferred for original research
and systematic reviews. The abstract should provide the context or background for the
study and should state the study’s purpose, basic procedures (selection of study subjects
or laboratory animals, observational and analytical methods), main findings (giving
specific effect sizes and their statistical significance, if possible), principal conclusions,
and funding sources. It should emphasize new and important aspects of the study or
observations. Articles on clinical trials should contain abstracts that include the items that
the CONSORT group has identified as essential
(http://www.consort-statement.org/?=1190).

References: Include only the most essential references and not more than 5.

Affiliations of authors: The indexed affiliations of author’s could be provided after the
references.

Send the abstracts to info@ayurworld.org

Few Steps to Writing an Effective Abstract


An abstract is a condensed version of the manuscript, which highlights the major points
covered, concisely describes its content and scope, and reviews its material in abbreviated
form. It is usually the first section read and sets the tone of the paper for the reviewer. It
must be concise and easy to read and must cover the important points.

Writing an abstract involves summarizing a whole manuscript and providing as much


new information as possible. The best way to write an effective abstract is to start with a
draft of the complete manuscript and follow these steps:

1. Identify the major objectives and conclusions.

2. Identify phrases with keywords in the methods section.

3. Identify the major results from the discussion or results section.

4. Assemble the above information into a single paragraph.

5. State your hypothesis or method used in the first sentence.

6. Omit background information, literature review, and detailed description of

7. Remove extra words and phrases.

8. Revise the paragraph so that the abstract conveys only the essential information.

9. Check to see if it meets the featured research topics of the 4th World Ayurveda
Congress

10. Give the abstract to a colleague (preferably one who is not familiar with your
work) and ask him/her whether it makes sense.

Writing an effective abstract will improve the chances of your paper being accepted,
encourage people to read it, and increase its impact.

A number of studies have indicated that a badly written paper with poor use of

English, even with good science, has less chance of being accepted , selected or
published.
All the best.

(Please find below an article which might give you more insights into the way of writing
an abstract)

How to Write an Abstract

Philip Koopman, Carnegie Mellon University


October, 1997

Abstract

Because on-line search databases typically contain only abstracts, it is vital to write a
complete but concise description of your work to entice potential readers into obtaining a
copy of the full paper. This article describes how to write a good computer architecture
abstract for both conference and journal papers. Writers should follow a checklist
consisting of: motivation, problem statement, approach, results, and conclusions.
Following this checklist should increase the chance of people taking the time to obtain
and read your complete paper.

Introduction

Now that the use of on-line publication databases is prevalent, writing a really good
abstract has become even more important than it was a decade ago. Abstracts have
always served the function of "selling" your work. But now, instead of merely convincing
the reader to keep reading the rest of the attached paper, an abstract must convince the
reader to leave the comfort of an office and go hunt down a copy of the article from a
library (or worse, obtain one after a long wait through inter-library loan). In a business
context, an "executive summary" is often the only piece of a report read by the people
who matter; and it should be similar in content if not tone to a journal paper abstract.
Checklist: Parts of an Abstract

Despite the fact that an abstract is quite brief, it must do almost as much work as the
multi-page paper that follows it. In a computer architecture paper, this means that it
should in most cases include the following sections. Each section is typically a single
sentence, although there is room for creativity. In particular, the parts may be merged or
spread among a set of sentences. Use the following as a checklist for your next abstract:

• Motivation:
Why do we care about the problem and the results? If the problem isn't obviously
"interesting" it might be better to put motivation first; but if your work is
incremental progress on a problem that is widely recognized as important, then it
is probably better to put the problem statement first to indicate which piece of the
larger problem you are breaking off to work on. This section should include the
importance of your work, the difficulty of the area, and the impact it might have if
successful.

• Problem statement:
What problem are you trying to solve? What is the scope of your work (a
generalized approach, or for a specific situation)? Be careful not to use too much
jargon. In some cases it is appropriate to put the problem statement before the
motivation, but usually this only works if most readers already understand why
the problem is important.

• Approach:
How did you go about solving or making progress on the problem? Did you use
simulation, analytic models, prototype construction, or analysis of field data for
an actual product? What was the extent of your work (did you look at one
application program or a hundred programs in twenty different programming
languages?) What important variables did you control, ignore, or measure?

• Results:
What's the answer? Specifically, most good computer architecture papers
conclude that something is so many percent faster, cheaper, smaller, or otherwise
better than something else. Put the result there, in numbers. Avoid vague, hand-
waving results such as "very", "small", or "significant." If you must be vague, you
are only given license to do so when you can talk about orders-of-magnitude
improvement. There is a tension here in that you should not provide numbers that
can be easily misinterpreted, but on the other hand you don't have room for all the
caveats.

• Conclusions:
What are the implications of your answer? Is it going to change the world
(unlikely), be a significant "win", be a nice hack, or simply serve as a road sign
indicating that this path is a waste of time (all of the previous results are useful).
Are your results general, potentially generalizable, or specific to a particular
case?

Other Considerations

An abstract must be a fully self-contained, capsule description of the paper. It can't


assume (or attempt to provoke) the reader into flipping through looking for an
explanation of what is meant by some vague statement. It must make sense all by itself.
Some points to consider include:

• Meet the word count limitation. If your abstract runs too long, either it will be
rejected or someone will take a chainsaw to it to get it down to size. Your
purposes will be better served by doing the difficult task of cutting yourself, rather
than leaving it to someone else who might be more interested in meeting size
restrictions than in representing your efforts in the best possible manner. An
abstract word limit of 150 to 200 words is common.

• Any major restrictions or limitations on the results should be stated, if only by


using "weasel-words" such as "might", "could", "may", and "seem".
• Think of a half-dozen search phrases and keywords that people looking for your
work might use. Be sure that those exact phrases appear in your abstract, so that
they will turn up at the top of a search result listing.

• Usually the context of a paper is set by the publication it appears in (for


example, IEEE Computer magazine's articles are generally about computer
technology). But, if your paper appears in a somewhat un-traditional venue, be
sure to include in the problem statement the domain or topic area that it is really
applicable to.

• Some publications request "keywords". These have two purposes. They are used
to facilitate keyword index searches, which are greatly reduced in importance now
that on-line abstract text searching is commonly used. However, they are also
used to assign papers to review committees or editors, which can be extremely
important to your fate. So make sure that the keywords you pick make assigning
your paper to a review category obvious (for example, if there is a list of
conference topics, use your chosen topic area as one of the keyword tuples).

Conclusion

Writing an efficient abstract is hard work, but will repay you with increased impact on
the world by enticing people to read your publications. Make sure that all the components
of a good abstract are included in the next one you write.