Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 13

13-Apr-17

Numerical Model of Shear Panel


with FEM

Idealization
The model implements 3D-Hexahedral
Element
Considering non-linear material and
geometric, also buckling effect
Pushover analysis with maximum
displacement 50 mm
Implement displacement load

1
13-Apr-17

Geometric
Rigid body element of loading plate

SD490 for the flange

2 SY225 for the web

1 3

270 mm
160 mm

2x12 mm

6 mm 290 mm 290 mm

Steel Material
SY225

(Mpa) p
0.0000 0.00
0.0011 225.00 0.0000
0.0040 230.75 0.0029
0.0060 234.75 0.0049
0.0100 242.75 0.0089
0.1000 422.75 0.0989

SD490

(Mpa) p
0.0000 0.00
0.0025 490.00 0.0013
0.0040 493.10 0.0029
0.0060 497.10 0.0049
0.0100 505.10 0.0089
0.1000 685.10 0.0989

2
13-Apr-17

Variable
No Variable
1 Centric, w/o lateral constraint vertical edge
2 Centric, with lateral constraint vertical edge
3 Eccentric, w/o lateral constraint vertical edge
4 Eccentric, with lateral constraint vertical edge

Result of Force and Deformation


Eccentric

Lateral constrain of vertical edge

Centric Centric

Eccentric

3
13-Apr-17

Result
Force and Deformation

To be compared with the


experiment result

Result
Stress contour case 1

Von Misses Von Misses

S22
S33

S23

4
13-Apr-17

Result
Stress contour case 2

Von Misses Von Misses

S22 S33

S23

Result
Stress contour case 3

Von Misses Von Misses

S22 S33

S23

5
13-Apr-17

Result
Stress contour case 4

Von Misses Von Misses

S22 S33

S23

Calculation Method of ES (Edge Stiffener)

6
13-Apr-17

Experiment Result

Comparison Numerical VS Experiment


Result

7
13-Apr-17

Optimization of RC Column with SP


570 tonf
570 tonf 570 tonf

Pin
Fix
SP5 SP5
10 m

0.6 m

0.6 m
SP4 SP4

2x25%
2x25%
100%

2x25%
2x25%
SP3 SP3
8.5 m

SP2 SP2

1.7 m

1.7 m
SP1 SP1

0.6 m

4m
2.4 m

1.2 m

1.2 m

100%

1.2 m

1.2 m
25% 25% 25% 25%

2.4 m 1.2 m 1.2 m 1.2 m 1.2 m

Structural Idealization
2 Dimensional Model
Implement Force-based Beam-Column Element
with 3 IP (Gauss-Legendre)
Reinforcing steel 2.46 %, USD685
Shear Panel with Uniform Strength is idealized as;
Single Link-Element
Truss system with Link-Element
Link Element Truss system with Link Element
2x25%

2x25%
2x25%

2x25%

Rigid el. Rigid el. Rigid el. Rigid el.

8
13-Apr-17

Ground motion input

Earthquake excitation input


(Kobe 1995, JMA NS record)

Result

FixTop; PinTop;
T = 0.143 s 1. w/o gap, T = 0.145 s
2. With gap, T = 0.384 s
With Single Link Element

9
13-Apr-17

Result

Energy dissipation comparison

Result

Displacement response comparison

10
13-Apr-17

Result

FixTop_U_0cmGap

PinTop_U_0cmGap PinTop_U_2cmGap

Hysteresis Loop Comparison

Result

FixTop_U_0cmGap

PinTop_U_0cmGap

PinTop_U_2cmGap

Displacement Response Comparison

11
13-Apr-17

Result

FixTop; PinTop;
T = 0.186 s 1. w/o gap, T = 0.213 s
2. With gap, T = 0.384 s

With Multi Link Element

Result

FixTop_U_0cmGap

PinTop_U_0cmGap PinTop_U_2cmGap

Hysteresis Loop Comparison

12
13-Apr-17

Result

FixTop_U_0cmGap

PinTop_U_0cmGap

PinTop_U_2cmGap

Displacement Response Comparison

Result

Hysteresis Loop Comparison

13

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi