Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Consulting Services
for
Feasibility Study and Detail Design for Construction of New
Bridges and
Design Review Bridges
Submitted by:
M/s Full Bright Consultancy (Pvt.) Ltd.
Office Address:
Sinamangal, Kathmandu, Nepal
Dhungre 40 m Double span
Abutement Stem
1 Design Data
0.281
4.59
A2
0.669
3.198
A2 RL= 167.930
1.4 0.2
1.6
h1= 4.590 m b1 = 1.4 m
h2 = 4.590 m b2 = 0.2 m
h3 = 0.7 m b3 = 0.3 m
h4 = 3.06 m b4 = 0.4 m
h5 = 0.06 m b5 = 1.10 m
b6 = 0.6 m
b7 = 0.10 m
Distance between bearing center to edge of stopper =0.6 m
Stopper Base width = 0.400 m
Min. length of Abutement Shaft = = 11 m
Minimum Length of Foundation= = 11.7 m
Thickness of abutment top cap = = 0.7 m
Toe Projection = = m
Ra Rb
40600
2
Coefficient of Active Earth Pressure Ka, cos 2 ( 1
Estimated based on Coulomb Earth K a Cos 2 cos( ) sin( ) sin( )
1/ 2
1 cos( ) cos( )
Pressure Theory
Ka= = 0.255
0 . 5 s = h 12 Ca * t
Total Dynamic Active Earth Pressure
=
ca= = 0.34
= 3555.34
Dynamic increase in soil pressure= = 888.834 KN
Point of aplication of Soil pressure=0.42*h = 4.095 m
Moment due to earth pressure about abutment base( static +surcharge)11165.5 kN-m
Earth Pressure /
888.8 3.5 3079.8
Seismic
Summary
The summary ofof
Loads
loads and Moments
and moments are tabulated below. The transverse
forces and moments are not considered, since it would not be critical due to
high moment of inertia of abutment. Therefore stresses are checked in
longitudinal direction only.
Combination A: ( Deald Load+Live Load and nos seismic) Dry Case Non Seismic
Load Horizonta
Vertical Lever Moment
Description Coeffice Lever Arm l force
Force (kN) Arm (kN-m)
nt (kN)
Superstructure DL 1.00 4198.40 0.28 1179.75
LL including Impact 1.00
942.88 0.28 264.95
Self wt. of abutment 1.00
2446.62 -0.13 -320.51
Soil mass 1.00 2666.50 4.09 10919.33
Braking effect 1.00 200.00 9.75 1950.00
Frictional effect 1.00 149.76 5.35 801.22
Buyoancy 1 -359.9
Super structure 1.00
Abutement 1.00
Soil mass
7228.0 3016.3 14794.7
Additional
Seimsic forces
Super structure 1.00
419.84 0.28 629.76 4.59 3008.57
Abutement 1.00 244.66 -0.13 366.99 3.20 -32.05
Soil mass 0.00 0.00 888.83 4.09 3639.78
Buyoancy 1
Super structure 1.00
Abutement 1.00
Soil mass
7138.2 4741.9 19639.1
Increment
Vertical factor for
Load Case Horizontal Moment Remarks
Force allowal
Force stresses **
Non- Seismic Dry Case
case A ( Com, I) 7587.90 3016.26 14794.74 1
Flooded
Cases ( 7228.0 3016.3 14794.7 1
Seismic Case B
Dry Case
( Com,
VI) 7498.10 4741.85 19639.08 1.5
Flooded
Cases (
Comb VI-
a) 7138.2 4741.9 19639.1 1.5
Max 7587.90 4741.85 19639.08
Note: IRC-6-2000,202.3 Table 1- abutement to be designed for the critical values of non-seismic cases and
checked for seismic cases
bar giving
Provide 74 nos of 32 Ast= 59514.3
spacing @ 145.333 mm. Hence provide @ 145 mm c/c
AB2a 32@145c/c AB2 32@145 c/c 74
bar giving
Provide 74 nos of 20 Ast= 23247.8
spacing @ 145.333 mm. Hence provide @ 145 mm c/c
at front giving Area %= 20064 < 23247.79 Okay
Pt= 0.47595 % 74
AB1a 20@145c/c AB1 20@145c/c 74
Design horizontal force = = 4741.85 KN
Corresponding shear stress, tv = 0.28 N/mm2
Percentage area of tension steel, 100Ast/bd = = 0.34 %
Full Bright - Sub Structure
Dhungre
Dhungre 40 m Double span
Buyoancy 0
5541.53 4442.05
Design of Backwall:
o
Horizontal force due to earth0.5*s()2tan2(45
pressure -f/2) 7.8
Which acts at a distance from backwall base = 1.1592 m
Horizontal force due to surcharge = qh3-h2Ka 16.89
Which acts at a distance from backwall base = 1.38 m
Self weight of backwall /m width = 29.376 kN/m
Live load on back wall considering class A loading = 57 kN
This acts at a distance from backwall toe = 0.2 m
The approach slab is resting over the abutment and the other end supported by the soil underneath.
It should be designed on the basis of elastic base theory, which is complicated. Hence the
dimensions and reinforcement is provided as per the standard design practice.
Horizontal force acting on the stopper above pier cap @ 10% of vertical load=683.402
Friction resistance = 1025.1 KN
However as additional factor of safety, assuming an extra lateral force in excess of frictional
resistance taking R = 0.20 in worst case, Fs = 1366.8
2
Area of steel required, Ast = M = 1766.61 mm
s st . j .d
Provide 20 mm bars @ 200 mm c/c, giving area 3140.00
of steel =
Max. Shear stress, tv
Percentage area of steel provided, p =
Permissible minimum shear strength of concrete =
Therefore, Shear reinforcement is required. Shear reinforcement shall be provided to carry
a shear force of
Assuming
Asv st d
Spacing, S =
Vus
vertical stirrups, 0.87fy Asv
0.4 b w
Hence provide 10 mm 2-legged vertical stirrups @ 75 mm c/c
Check:
1025.1
Maximum earth quack force is considered 15 % of total vertical load Kn
(F1)=
Friction between the elastomeric bearing and concrete = 0.60 from Code
4552.74
Friction force between the elastomeric bearing and concrete (F2)=
Return wall will be monolithic with back wall. They are joined together through
30cm *30cm fillets. The load acting on the wing walls would be earth pressure
and is designed to withstand a live load equivalent to surcharge of 1.2 m height of
earth fill according to IRC 78:2000
b1
h1= 3.5 m
h2= 1.25 m h2
h3= 3 m h1 h3
h4= 0.5 m
b1= 3.5 m
h4
AB1
1 20@145 300 6214 91.5o 300 20 145 6.8144 37 252.13114 622.7639
c/c
AB1a
2 20@14 10850 91.5o 300 20 145 37 0 0
5c/c
5990
AB2
3 32@1 300 32 290 6.29 37 232.73 1468.526
45 c/c
300
300
AB2a
4 32@1 4592 32 290 5.192 38 197.296 1244.938
45c/c
300
250
8 AB9
500
220 300
10 AB10 16 1.82 44 80.08 126.5264
700
100
10850
12 AB12 20 10.85 1 10.85 26.7995
10850
AB6 1 layer of 6 mm bar Mesh
12 220c/c AB5
12 220c/c AB4
AB2a 32@145c/c
Back face (Hill Side) Name of the Bridge= Dhungre Front face (Toe Side)
16 250c/c AB8
2X50
2 AB5 10850 16 10.85 13 282.10 445.72
940
200
2500
2200
1550
218
AB8
10 @ 250c/c R5 AB7
16 mm 6 nos, R2
1.25 `
1.5
Dhungre 40m Double span
x
Maximm load on individual Pile 2
1 115.2 m2
245 m2
2
y 1
HFL= 172.02
Fixity level
157.33
23.6
144.33
Center line of Abutement stem
4 nos 0.8m3.5 m C/C
Bridge Axis
11.7
Dry (comb.1)
Non Seismic 1135.3 15.9 0.0 1151.2 1119.3
Flooded
Comb (1-a)
Non Seismic 1014.5 15.9 0.0 1030.4 998.6
Dry Comb (V1)
Seismic 1147.3 167.3 114.7 1429.4 865.3
Flooded
(Comb VI-a)
Seismic 1026.6 167.3 114.7 1308.6 744.5
Maximum
Non Seismic 1135 16 0 1151 1119
Seismc 1147 167 115 1429 865
Maximum force on single pile: Non Seismic Case: KN 1151
Seismic Case: KN 1429.4
Inclusive- Sub Structure
Jangha
Dhungre 40 m span
Number of piles
= 16
Pile depth
= 22
Pile diameter
= 0.8
Size of pile cap
=
L
= 8.4 m along the axis
B
= 11.7 m across the axis
h
= 1.6 m
Load Calculation:
Degree of fixity provided by
geotechnical Engineer = 9m
The Capacity of the single pile
= 1270 KN
=
Hence provided area of main reinforcement 5027 mm2
Checking the section and reinforcement for the stresses as per IRC
Scc = P/At
= 1.995 2.4769248
Scb = M/Zt
= 5.309 6.724848
(Scc/Sacc + Scb/Sacb) = = 0.837 1.0549972
Which is <1 <1 OK
Let's provide bars with diameter 16 mm @ 100mm c/c up to the 10.6 m from pile cap
Pile cap
1600
Groove 65
22000
16 @200cc upto 13 m from
pile bottom
Dhungre- Pile
Dhungre 40 m span
4 APC4 16@ 300C/C 400 11550 400 16 300 12350 25 308.75 487.825
20 17124 12 205.488 507.56
5 APC5 Pitch=1000
4076.21
Bar schedule of pile
Dia of Spacing length of No of Total Total
SN Bar Mark Shape of bars (not to scale) bar(m (mm) Each bar bars Length( Weight(
AP1 20@ 150C/C 200 20 150 23650 336 7946.4 19628
23450
16 2360.3522 2432 2.36035 9069.8
AP2 2*200
28697
Dhungre 40 m span
3.29
2.6
163.49 KN-m
Due to the load of the Cap itself= =
6861.47 KN-m
Due to the dead load from the
superstructure= =
2871.49 KN-m
Due to the Live load from the
superstructure= =
1292.17 KN-m
Live load impact =
11188.62
Total moment at critical section =
Number of Rows = 2
Number of Rows = 1
Let the transverse Reinforceemnt = 16
clear Cover = 40
Effective detph= = 1816.00
Effective detph=d' = 56.00 mm
Distance of CG of the bearing center from
the face of support = 2.18
Neutraal axis = = 577.976
2
Area of singly reinforced Ast2= = -2387.93 mm
2
Total Reinforcement area Ast= = 28919.1 mm 36 144.444
Check for Shear 17 nos both sides, 32 @150 c/c P1a
Due to the load of the Cap itself= = 305.21 KN 17 nos both sides, 32 @150 c/c P1b
Due to the dead load from the
superstructure= = 3440.98 KN 6 nos , 20 @ P2a Compression Steel
17 nos both sides, 32 @150 c/c P1a 17 nos both sides, 32 @150 c/c P1b
7 nos both sides, 16 @140 c/c P4
2400
2320
NO6:
OF82
5 P3 16 155 48 8.50 644.64
0=
1920
6325
4362.5
Total 3.2
Dhungre 40 m span
2.175
5.55 3.29
2.6
167.93
165.93
8.4 8.4
Load Calculation:
Due to dead Load:
Dead load from superstructure = 8192.8 kN
Self wt. of bearing & expansion joint = 409.64 kN
Total DL from superstructure = 8602.44 kN
Effect of Buyoancy
Submerged volume of Pier = 21.71500258 m3
By volume of displaced Water by
the pier 15% only considered = -32.5725039 kN
Combination A: ( Deald Load+Live Load and nos seismic) Dry Case Non Seismic
Horizont
Load Vertical Horizontal
al force Moment (kN- Moment
Description Coefficen Force force (kN)
(kN) Y- m) Y-Y (kN-m) X-X
t (kN) X-X
Y
Resultant Force =
Vertical Load = 11890.52 KN
Horizontal Load = 292.01 KN
Moment = 2208.63552 KN-m
Horizont
Load Vertical Horizontal
al force Moment (kN- Moment
Description Coefficen Force force (kN)
(kN) Y- m) Y-Y (kN-m) X-X
t (kN) X-X
Y
Resultant Force =
Vertical Load = 11890.52 KN
Horizontal Load = 298.60 KN
Moment = 2208.63552 KN-m
Horizont
Load Vertical Horizontal
al force Moment (kN- Moment
Description Coefficen Force force (kN)
(kN) Y- m) Y-Y (kN-m) X-X
t (kN) X-X
Y
Resultant Force =
Vertical Load = 11423.39 KN
Horizontal Load = 180.01 KN
Moment = 10493.23 KN-m
Floded Case Seismic (Combination VI-a)
Horizont
Load Vertical Horizontal
al force Moment (kN- Moment
Description Coefficen Force force (kN)
(kN) Y- m) Y-Y (kN-m) X-X
t (kN) X-X
Y
Superstructur 1.00 10008.49 0.00
eLL
DLincluding
0.20 376.41 0.00
Impact
Braking
effect/Tractive
0.20 28.00 273.00
Frictional 0.20 30.40 168.73
effect
Buyoancy
1.00 -32.57 0.00
Water Current
1.00 0.00 62.41 0.00 170.17
Sub Total
Non Seismic
Forces
10352.32 58.40 62.41 441.73 170.17
Additional
Seimsic
forces
Super
structure
975.80 1501.27 1689.48 8332.07 8332.07
Sub Total 1.00 975.80 1501.27 1689.48 8332.07 8332.07
Total 1.00 11328.13 1559.67 1751.89 8773.80 8502.24
Resultant Force =
Vertical Load = 11328.13 KN
Horizontal Load = 1774.95 KN
Dhungre 40 m span
Increment
Load Vertical factor for
Horizont Moment Remarks
Case Force allowal stresses
al Force **
Non-
Seismi Dry Case
c case ( Com, I) 11890.52 292.01 2208.64 1
A Flooded
Cases (
Com 1a) 11890.5 298.6 2208.6 1
Checking the section and reinforcement for the stresses as per IRC
400
3087.43
Number of piles
= 16
Pile depth
= 20
Pile diameter
= 0.8
Size of pile cap
=
L
= 8.4 m along the axis
B
= 8.4 m across the axis
h
= 1.6 m
Load Calculation:
Degree of fixity provided by
geotechnical Engineer = 11.70 m
The Capacity of the single pile
= 999 KN
Dhungre 40 m Double span
=
Hence provided area of main reinforcement 7540 mm2
Checking the section and reinforcement for the stresses as per IRC
Scc = P/At
= 1.500 2.1172231
Scb = M/Zt
= 1.333 6.7083097
(Scc/Sacc + Scb/Sacb) = = 0.310 1.0
Which is <1 <1 OK
x
Maximm load on individual Pile 2
115.2 m2
1
2
115.2 m2
y 1
HFL= 172.02
8.59
Lowest RBL 167.93 167.93
163.43
MSL= 166.33
21.60
8.4
Bridge Axis
4nos 0.8m @ 2.4 m C/C
Horizontal Momen
load laong Horizontal t along Moment
the axis load laong the axis along the
Forces Vertical Load (XX) the axis (YY) (Mxx) axis (Myy)
Dry (comb.1)
Non Seismic 864 0 58 922 807
Flooded
Comb (1-a)
Non Seismic 864 0 49 913 815
Dry Comb (V1)
Seismic 810 244 246 1301 320
Flooded
(Comb VI-a)
Seismic 847 221 228 1297 397
Maximum 0 0 0 0 0
Non Seismic 864 0 58 922 815
Seismc 847 244 246 1301 397