1 (Answers to Questions Raised by Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan in its Order dated ‘5 May 2017 incase of C.MA No. 2939 of 2017 in Constitution Petition No. 29 af 2016 ete) Chapter Back Ground 1. Honorable Supreme Cour of Pakistan vide its onder dated 20, April 2017, in constitution paltion Nos. 29, 30 of 2016 and 03 of 2017, in wdition to other directions, also ordered vide para 3, reproduced asunder that; “sow the JIT may also examine the evidence and material NAB and FIA relating to or having any nexus withthe possession or acqui aforesaid flat o ‘any, already available with of the my ather assets or pecuniary resources and their ori 2. In compliance tothe above refered orders ofthe Honorable Apex Cour, the record was ‘requisitioned by JIT from NAB, FIA and SECP regarding cases inquired or investigated by these Departments against the Respondent No. 1 and others, on the allegations of corruption and ‘corrupt practices. 3. Te was noted that seme of the cases originally initiated by the defunet Fhtosab Bureat, after the creation of NAB in 1999, were den transferred to i, which were subsequently processed by NAB, Similaly, some cases were initiated by NAB on its own and the same were refered to FIA for investigation and preparation of references under NAO, 1900, Similarly, FIA and SECP also conducted eases against the respondent No. 1, his family and their industial / business concems, The Summary ofthe eases as received i highlighted as under -Fille of the case Purchase of Helicopter (Assets beyond known Sources af Income) | Reference Agrinst Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif and Saif ur Rehman regarding Reference Against Mian Nawaz Shar and her regarding huge Wegal teres Tn share deposits af Hudabiya Paper Mills [Reference agaist Mian Muhammed Nawaz Shari, Mian Sharif and Mt Shamim Alter for construction of Palatal Mansions and buildings in Raiwand Estate which are beyond knewn sources of income. Reference against Mian Mulammod Nawaa Shan, Itelag foundry aad others Tor willl deat of foan payable to National Bank of Pakistan, Thvestgation against Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif and otbow regarding Acquisition of Avenfield properties in Londoa(Assets beyond known Sources of| income) Thvestigarion agaiast Mian Mubanaad Nawaz Shan Tor misusing his auhoriy i ‘sacking thousands of employees and appointing his own favorites at top positions in different depariments, Tivestigation against Mian Mohammad Newae Sharif regarding misuse of authoray in legal appointments in FIA, Investigation Against Mian Muimmed Nawaz Sharif and other regarding sale/purchase 0° damaged urea fertilizer and causing loss of Rs, 158 million Tnvestgation against Mian Muharamad Nowe Sharif end other regarding leakage of secrecy about freezing of foreign curency accounts and transmitting $S00rnillion abroad, Tivestgation aguinat Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif and oter regarding setting up ‘v0 Sugar Mil | investigation against Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif for misusing his authority in provision of smenitics to Raiwand Estate dough diffrent government departments in Ke Investigation against Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, Saif ur Rehinan and Ishaqa Dar and other egending import of BNW ears, Investigation Against Mian Mufammad Nawaz Shari and Abdul Setar Lalika fr ‘misuse of authority in import of damaged feilizer from China causing los of Rs ‘52 milion to National Exchequer. Investigation aginst Mian Maharamad Nawaz Shari regarding misuse of authority in award of 15 acres land fo M/s REDCO ownod by Mr, Saif ur Rehman at Muree, Tinvesigation against Mian” Mohammad Nawaz Sharif and Kalsoom Nawaz regarding the prchase of Bird Lodge Murre, Tavestigation apsinst Mian Muhammad Nawaz Shad? for misusing his wutboriy in ranting illegal promotion to Muhammad Sharif from AD to DD FIA. Thvestigation against Mian Muhammad Nawaz Shari and Azam Khan Woti for ‘misappropriation in Afforestation along Motorway M-2 [investigation Avani Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif and others regarding egal appointments in PIA. Tavestigation Against” Mian Muhanad Nawaz Shai and” Shams ul Mulk Chairman WAPDA for misuse of authority in granting illegal benefit to Mis KE. Tivestigation agains Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif regarding Miegal allotment oF plots in LDA, Tivestigation aginst Mian Muhammad Nawaz Shari and other regarding misuse of authority in grant of contract for import of wheat to his own Company. investigation Against Mian Muhinmad Nawaz Sharif and other regarding asls beyond known sources of income (benami investments in Hudabiys Engineering Company) Investigation Against Mian Muhammad Nawaz Shan and others reearding sequistion of land through coercion, in /around Raiwand (Assets beyond known Sources of income) ‘Mihammad Nawaz Sharif and others in the matters oF investigation Agiinss Mi Sharif Tus. ‘vestigation Against Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif For misusing his authority in construction of Road to Raiwand Estate Investigation Against Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif regarding Construction ofFlat end Mansions and buildings Tivestigation agit Mien Muhammad Nawaz Shanf regarding egal Allotment of Plots in LDA, Tiguines against Mian Muhammad’ Nawaz Sharif for Tegal allouments of plots in LDA(LOx inquires merged into 1 inguiy) Title ofthe No. | FIRNo. 1271994 case against Huddabiya Engineering Pvt Led b FIR No, 13/1994 Against Huddabiya Paper Mills Pvt, Limited. List of Cases Provided by SB Ser | Tile of the ease No. Investigation Against Ranzan Sagar Mills Laie [Investigation Against Chandhry Sugar Mills1, Categories of the Cases, 4 Ongoing Cases . Challans / References Quashed by Courts All the 32 Cases received ftom NAB, FIA and SECP have been thoroughly examined by the JIT. The eases have been broadly divided by the JIT, into following three Categories. ©. Investigations Ingres closed by the concemed Departnents ‘The summary ofa these received cases, a8 per above thre catsgories is as follow: ‘Ongoing cases since 1999-2000 (NAB) 1 As per informaion provided by NAB vide letter dated 21 June 2017, Ix inquiry and ‘8 investigatiors are under process since 1999- 2000 and even afer lapse of about 18 years, no worthaile progress has been made il date, 'b. These under process cases include the two mos important cases pertaining tthe omestc assets of Raiwvand estate and offshore assets of Avenfield properties (the primary matter of the constitution petition Nos. 29, 30 of 2016 and 03 of 2017, Panama Papers case) but despite being authorized almost two decades ear, they remained pend on one pretext or the other and no serious effort ison record to finalize these eutstanding cases on merit, Following table shows lst of Ongoing inguties and investigations with NAB Mian Mubaramad [Nawaz Sharif egarding Ser. [Tite ofthe ease Date of | Allegations Present Satus No. Authorization ‘& | Investigation against | 0811-1999 | Allegedly Mian | fnvesigation sll Mubamamad Nawaz | under process. Sharif misused hisiMegal appointents in FIA 6 appointment of 42 employees on diferent posts in FIA. ‘These appoininents were made on bass in violation of uract service rules and regarding assets beyond, known sourees of income (Gena investments in Hudabiys Engg Company) Company of year 1995.96 show share equity of Rs. © million by Sheikh Zakauddin, He has disowned ‘is investment Hence Rs, 69 procedure Tnvestgation against] 102.2000 | Mian Mubamead [Investigation sl Mien Mutaramad Nawaz Sharif | under process. [Nawaz Sharif regarding misused his illegal allotment of plots authority in in LDA. Alloment of plots cr diferent beneficiaries in Violation and rules ofallotments ‘© | Tavestgation Against] 3802-2000 | Audited Financial | Investigation sal Mian Muhammad Statements of | under process. Nawaz Sharif ani other Hudabiya Engg,uuniocounied for Investigation — Against | 79-02-2000 | Mian Nawaz Shaaf| Investigation sil Mian Muharumad and his family have | under process. Nawaz Shatif and been alleged others regarding have purchased! acquisition cf land soquired and in through coercion in / ‘itfezent mouzas in around Reiwand (Assets Raivand which is beyond known Sources is-proportionate to of income) theit known sources of income Tavestgation again] 31.05.2000 | Mian Nawaz Sharif | Tavestigation ld Mien Muhammad and his famity have | under proces. Nawaz Sharif and allegedly purchased others regarding 4x properties soquistion of Avenfcld (16168,17 and properties in London ITA) on park lane (Assets beyond known, Which are chus dis- Sources of income) proportionate to ‘hele known sources of income. investigation Against | 31.03.2000 [Allegedly Sharif tavestigation stil ‘Mian Mutammad family has received | under process. Nawaz Sharif and others in the maters of Sharif Trust cores of rupees through under hand methods in Sharif] ‘rust. Accounts of, the trust have not been subjected to audit and amounts | have been‘isappropriaed Sharif Family has acquied assets whieh are held in the name of tust as bbenami properties, Tavestigaion Against | 17042000 | Allegedly Mian | Investigation sil jan Muhammad ‘Muhammad Nawaz | under process. Nawaz Shavit for Sharif misused his misusing. his authority authority in in construction of Road directing the funds (o Raiwand Fete of Zils. Council in construction of road leading to Raiwand estate whereas, this project was not included inthe plan, Thvestgation against [0.062000 | Mian Miharamad | Tavestigation stl ‘Mian Muhammad ‘Nawaz Shatit) under process [Nawaz Sharif regarding rmisused his illegal allotment of suthority in Plots in LDA allotment of plots © ferent beneficiaries in Violation of rules of allotment, Tquiry against” Mian [70.02.2000 | Mian Miabamsmad | Taquiry sti under Mutammad Nawaz Nawaz Sharif process Sharif regarding sega misused his‘lfoiment” of plots in ‘thority ia LDA (10 x inguities allotment of plots merged into I inguiy) © dliferort beneficiaries in Violation of rules of allotment oR or Respondent the Lahore The ‘Sharif famity wen into appeal in Lahore High Court in 6 cases from time to time, Out of these 6 cases, 4 were references filed by NAB and 2 were challans filed by FIA. ‘The summary ofthese cases areas under: = ().Quashed / Acqulited Cases of NAB (@) NAB had filed 4 references before the Accountability Coucts, tal of only ‘one reference ie. Reference No. 2/2000, was held whersby the Accused [Nawaz Sharif was convicted and sentenced to RIL for 14 years along with imposition of fine to the tune of Rs. 20 Millio and disqualified to hold public office for 21 yeas, (Later Aoquited by Lahore High Court in writ petition no. 28 of 2009) (b) The rest of the three references never went under proper trial and appreciation of evidence filed therein, by the Accountability Courts, ‘reason being that Mr, Nawaz Sharif and family was sent to exile in Saudi Arabia and these references were adjoummed sine die, However, in 2011, 3x separate writ petitions were fled in shore High Court, praying fe ‘quishment of te references. (©) The petitions were heard separately by two Member bench of Lahore High Court Comprising of Justice Kh. Imtiaz Ahmed and Justice Muhammad© © © 20 Farukh Irfan Khan, The Common fea 3x petitions by Two-member bench was the split decisions and final decision by Referee judge. In references No. 5/2000 and 7/2000, the Justice Kh Imtisz Ahmed opined that the references stand quashed however NAB can re-investgate the matter, This was difered by Justice ‘Musamavadl Farr Ian Khan who was ofthe view that NAB cannot be allowed to re-investigate the matter. The point was refered to referee Judge Justice Sardar Shamim Khan who agreed with the view of Justice ‘Mutammad Farm Irfan Khan andthe reference was quashed and NAB was not allowed to re-iavestigate the mates, feof the Judgements of all these “Mati related to reference No.11/2001, was also referred ta same learned ‘womember bench vide a separate writ petition by the accused where ‘agin a split decision was reached by the leamed bench, Justice Kh Imtiaz [Abuaed ofthe view tat petition filed by the Accused shouldbe dismissed and accused be directed to approach Accountability Court to make their pleas, whereas Justice Farrukh Ifan Khan was ofthe view tht reference be quashed, The matter was again referred to referee judge Justice Sardar ‘Mutammad Shamim Khan who agreed with the view taken by Justice Farrakh Iefin Khan and the reference was quashed by Honorable Labore High Court. NAB never filed appeal against these decisions in Honorable Supreme ‘Cou despite having strong grounds Following Table Shows List of four NAB references, which wee filed in the Accountability Courts and subsequently acquited / quashed by Honcrable Lahore High Court.a Ser. [Refno. [Decision [Peto [Prayer [Decision by |Decision | Appeal No, by Trial | n No. ‘the Lahore] by the filed by Court | Lac High Court | referee | NAB in Dench along |judge | Supreme with date | with date. | Court a |e Nawaz [2H [Appeal [Convietion set[N.A_ } Not filed 2000} start | 2009 | against aside and (Helicop | Sentence ‘conviction | accused terCase)|d to RI acquitted of all for 4 charges. Years (26.06.2009) snd fine Rs 20 milion be No wal | 26197 | Wik Reference | Referenoe | Not filed 2000 was |tt | petition | quashed but | Quashed (fudabi | conducte for Split decision | and NAB ya Paper | d ‘quishmeat [by bench on | is barred Mills of the issue of re- | from re- Case) Reference | investigation | investgat by NAB. fon of the (Apel 2013) | mater (3.2014 7 | ) = No Wal | 26197 | Wat | Refovence | Reference | Not filed 2000 was |11 | petition | quashed but | Quashed | cRaiwan | conducte for Split decision | and NAB. 4 Botte | ¢ quashment | by beach on | is bared Case) of the issue ofre-| from re Reference | investigation | investiga by NAB fon of the matter (13.2014 > & [U7 |Ne wat /B01a [Wet | Spit dosison | Reference | Not led 2001 was |11—_ | petton | of bench on| Quashed | (As per (oan | conducte for dismissal of (62.2015) | NBP faut | d quashiment | Writ petition or correspon ease) of quashment_of| ence2 Reerence [reference ‘utstand ng, Toans settled 1 adjusted in 201% 14) @). Quashed cases of FIA. Following table shows list of challans / FIRS fied by FIA but later on quashed by Lahore High Court ‘Se [Title oF the] Date of | Allegations Present Status No. | ease Authorization & [FIR No. [10.11.1954 | Obtaining oF wrongil | Alor investigation of 12/1994 grin by Mian the matter challan wis Case against Muhammad Nawaz |173 Cr, PC was filed By Hudabiya Sharif and others by |IA before Special Engineering ‘obiaining loan for| Judge Central. During Pvt Led (Loan Huudabiya Bagineering | the pendency of Trial Amount Pv. Et through | two writ petitions involved Rs, opening fake and | (12172097 and 1217397 60 million) fictions sccounts in| were filed by "the iffereot banks and depositing black money fn these counts ‘through forvign remittances (FIR ws 419,470,468,471, and 109 PPC dw See 5(2)47 PCA and article 3 of holders of sceused for quashment of Challan, Petitions wore accepted Lahore High Court and Challan was au vide onder 12.06.1997. No appeat was filed by against the decision of Lahore High Court, representative office) by shod dated FIA,B bo [FIR No [02.11.1994 [Obiaining oF wrong [ARer investigition of 5vi994 gain by Mian | the mater, challan ws Against Muhammad Newar |173 CrPC was filed By Huddabiya Sharif by obtaining | FIA before Special Paper Mil oan for Hudabiya | Judge Central. During Pvt. Limited. paper Mills Put. Lid.| the pendency of Trial (Loan Amount through opening fake | wo weit petitions involved Rs. and fictitious accounts | (1217297 and 1217397 40 milion) in diferent banks snd | were filed by the depositing black money | accused for quashment in these accounts | of Callan, Petitions through foreign | were acoepled by remittances. (FIR. ws | Lahore High Court and 419,420,468,471, and | Challan was quashed 109 PPC fw See|vide onder dated 5(@)47 PCA and article | 12.06.1997. No appeal 3 of holders of | was fled by IA representative office) | against the decision of Lahore High Court (). Other Cases Finalized/Closed by Agencies @ byNAB. Following Table shows list of eases inquired and investigated by and subsequently closed by NAB on the basis on non- incriminating evidence. Ser [Tile ofthe ease [Date of | Allegations No. Authorizath ‘& | Tavesigation against | 08.11, 1999] Allegedly Mian | Tavestigation was Mian Mubanenad, Mutammad | closed on the ground Nawaz Sharif for Nawaz Sharif1“ ‘iausing bie thority jn sacking thousands of employees and sppointing his own, favorites in top positions of diferent departments. Misused his authority and sacked thousands of employees appointed in the tenure of Pakistan People's Paty He further appointed his favorites on top opinion of Establishment division the employees were on contracts and they were laid off as per the recommendations of concerned departments. ‘The investigation was closed on 02.01.2008 postion of diferent corporations and banks, Tinvestigaton Against | 08111999 [Allegedly Mian | Investigation was Mian Muhammad Muhammad | closed on the grounds Nawaz Sharif and Nawaz Sharif and | that proper procedare other regarding sale / Abdul Sattar] was adopted for purchase of damaged lila were | dispossl of damaged urea fertilizer and involved in ste / urea and no loss to the ceausing toss of Rs. purchase of 16 lac | exchequer was caused, 138 million bags of damaged | The investigation was Urea at a very| closed on 16.01.2001 low mite which ‘eaused loss t0 the tune of Rs. 158 nillion 10 the exchequer. Investigation sgainst | 811.1999 [Allegedly — Mian | Investigation was Mian Muberamad Mubamad Nawaz closed in. year 2004 Nawaz Sharif and Shacf, —Sartaj | de to non-avaitabiity other repiding ‘Aziz, shag Dar |of evidence in support leakage of soerecy and" Saif ur ofallegations. about freezing of Rehman were foreign exrency involved in accounts a misusing their ‘cansmiting authority and $00aillion abroad, leakage of secrecy about freezing of | foreign currency‘osounis om 35-39 May 1998 and siphoning of 500 nillion Abroad, Tivestigation against | 0811-1999" [Allegedly ‘Mater was refered to ‘Mian Muhammad ‘Companies FIA for investigation. awe Shari? and (Owned by Mian | Investigation officer other regarding setting Muhammad | submitted his report up to Sugar Nils in Nawaz Sharif and } with the Kenya Family wore | recommendation to supplying lose the case, as these ‘machinery for | mills were neither setting up two,/estblished nor Sugar Mills in| mmagement of ‘Kenya and finds | existing mills were for this purpose | taken over. The case were was closed on supplied 12.06.2002 Government Pakistan on Supplier credit basis which would have been uiimately misappropriated Tavestigation ainst) 16111999) Mian Muhammad | Investigation — closed Mian Mohamad Nawaz Sharif} by NAB on Nawaz Sharif for used his influence | 07.12.2000, as no ‘misusing his authority as Prime Minister | incriminating evidence in provision of on different | involving comupt amenities to Raiwand departments for | practices came on Este through provision of record different goverment amenities 9 departments Raiwand estate. Tivestgation against] 16111999 | Allegedly Mis | The TO recommended Mian Muhammad REDCO owned the case for closure as Nawaz Sharif, Ssifor by Mr. Saif-ur| tax evasion does not Rehman, Ishag Dar Rehman is fall under the ambit of and other regerding involved in| NAB. The case was import of BMW cars, import of 62 closed by NAB on BMW cars_feom 05.04.2003,16 South Ailes and Custom duty was evaded on the import of hese Tinvestigaion Against [25.11.1999 [Allegedly the | Investigation was Min Mulmmmad accused persons | conducted and it was Nawaz Sharif and ‘were involved in | found that only 8,000 ‘Abdul Sattar Lalika import of 20,000 | tons of fertilizer was for misuse of | tons of damaged | found damaged and authority in import of TSP fertilizer | necessary actions were damaged — feilizer ‘which caused fos | taken to make the loss fom China causing to Nationa | good. ‘The loss of Rs. $2 million Exchequer. investigation was to National closed on 17.11.2000 Exchequer. Tnvestigation against] 13.12.1999 | Mian Muhammad | The investigation was Mian Muhsmmad Nawaz Sharif elosed on 12.02.2002 Nawaz Share| Being Chief | as the ease was not regarding misuse of Minister Punjab| found ft for authority in avard of misused his | prosecution because 15 acres land t» Mis authority and] the ease was REDCO ownel by alloted a prime | cancelled and the (Mr. Saifur Rehan at land in Murree to | custody was restored Morree Mis REDCO in| back wo the department violation of | hence m9 toss procedures ani on | occurred, very low rates Which eaused loss twexchequer. Investigation against | 22.12.1999 | Allegedly — bird |The TO recommended Mian Muhammad lodge was] the case for closure on Nawaz Sharif and purchased by the ground that the Kalsoom Nawaz Mian Muhammad | property was declared regarding the purchase "Nawaz Sharif and | by Kalsoom Nawaz in of Bird Lodge Maree. these assets are | her wealth tax retums Aisproportionate | and par of it was to the known | inherited by her from, source af income, her father and part of| it was purchased by her. ‘The investigationwv Was closed on 1u,11.2000 Investigation against | 25.12.1989 | Allegedly die | Since both the ceised Mian Mubammad Mian Mubamumad | persons were Nawaz Sharif for Nawaz Shari convicted in. other misusing his aubority misused is | eases and one of the in granting legal authority and J accused i.e. Mian promotion to Muammad | Nawaz Sharif was Muhammed — Shari Sharif AD FIA exiled hence the case fom AD w DD FIA, was promoted to ) was recommended for the post of |elosure by 10. The Deputy Director ease was closed on jn violation of [27.10.2001 Service rules. Tavestigation egainst 31.12.1999 | Allegedly the|Dus to none ‘Mian Muhanad accused, were | availablity of| Nawaz Sharif’ and involved in| incriminating evidence ‘Acam Khan Hoti for extending legal | the TO recommended misappropriation in favor in grant of | the case for closure on Afforestation — along contracts for| 14.09.2000 However the M-2 Motorway. Afforeaation | the matter remained along M-2. The | pended with NAB ill twces were not | completion of the planted by the | contract as per terms contractors and | and conditions, Aer the funds were | ensuring the fullling misappropriated. | of ‘contractual obligations, the case was closed in year 2012. Tnvestigation Against | 04022000 [Misuse off Mater was Mian Muhammad ‘Authority by | investigated by NAB. Nawaz Sharif and Mian Mubammad | end the case was others regerding [Nawaz Sharif by | closed on 19.01.2015, illegal appointments ‘appointing his | due to non-availability inIA. favorite persons | incriminating evidence in PIA on | and record diferent posts Investigation Against [4.022000 | Allegedly The mation was Mian Muhanad WAPDA — had | referred by NAB to Nawaz. Sharif and eclared the | FIA for investigation,e ‘Shams ul Mlk Chairman WAPDA for misuse of | authority in panting illegal benefit to Ms KEL Reliabiliy Rum “Text taken by Mls Kohinoor Energy Limited (A power production company owned by Saigol Group) (on 20.06.1997 as unsatisfactory. Mian, Mubamesad Nawaz Sharif directed WAPDA to accept the test results which resulted into payment of Rs. 45 erores to the company, ultimately causing oss the exchequer FIA completed the investigation and submitted its report with the recommendation 10 close the case as the competent committee decided the matter in favor of the company. ‘The case was closed .0n 05.05.2003 Tavestigaion egainst | 17.02.2000 ‘Mian Muhammad, Nawaz Sharif and other regarding misuse of authosty in ‘grant of contact for import of wheat to his ‘own Company. Allegedly ‘Mian ‘Muhammad Nawaz Sharif was involved in ‘creating artificial Shortage of wheat in Pakistan and imported 4 nillion tens of ‘wheat from USA. “The contrat for the shipping. of| the said wheat was awarded 19 company without any tender Trvestigation was recommended for closure by 10 as nothing substantial evidence could be ound against the accused, the Investigation was ‘losed on 27.10.2001, Investigation Against |= Misn— Mubarad Nawaz sant regard Flats ad Mansions cconsiructed in Raiwand estate Tnvestgation was ‘Clubbed with other investigaion(S.11)on the same issue and‘Consiniction of Fat, we Terence was fed Mansions and isproportonate buildings to the known sources of (), Cases Closed By SECP. Following table Shows the lst of eases cloved SECP: ar ‘Of the] Date of | Allegations [Present Siamus No | case Authortzatio | Tnvestigation | (210.1994 —[Tnvesigation | Tavestgation was aitiated tate the Against was affairs of Ramzan Sugar Mills by Ramzan conducted | SECP on the directions —of| Sugar Mills against | Honorable Lahore High Court on Limited Shait family | che petition of Mian Miraj ud din ‘on multiple | and others Investigation was allegations | conducted by M/s Anjum Asim ‘mainly oo | Shahid and Company and report breach of | was submitted to SECP on trust by Mian | 25.03.1995, Tater, the matter was Sharif, Funds | settled between Ramzan Sugar of the company | was allowed and Appellants and settlement by Lahore High court were being | vide its order dated 06.04.2014, used on un-| Therefore the case was closed. authorized objectives, assets of the company being transfered to save sgt mills and ‘company suffering continuous losses.20 Tavestigation| Against Chaudry Sugar Mills 4.102012 Tavestigntion ageinat Chaudry Sugar Mills conducted by SECP on the allegations of Suspicions of Money Iaundering and discrepancies in their ‘annual audited accounts Tnvesigation ws 263 of Companies Ondinance was initiated by SECP against Chaudhry Sugar Mills. The company did not provide the ‘complete record to investigation team despite serious observations, ‘communicated through repeated requests, Though observations were ‘ot adequately addressed and were in field but in June 2016, the investigation was abruptly closed in back dates on 141.2013,‘Analysis and Recommendations of JET ‘Votuminous recore of each of the cases falling in above referred three categories as highlighted in Chapter 2 was thoroughly examined by JIT in pursuance to the orders of the Honorable Supreme Court and recommendations have been formulated for taking appropriate action under the directions of Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan in cases; 1 2 Where JIT founds thatthe NAB inquiries / investigations have been considerably delayed and are stil under pracess even after a passage of about 17-18 years. >. Where no inquiry / investigation ts ‘been initiated by NAB despite the availablity of relevant record. & The references / Challans waich have been quashed / respondents acquitted by Honorable Lahore High Court but despite strong grounds, no appeal was prefered, 44 The cases which have been closed without any proper justification; ‘Recommendations on NAB Cases, Following Table shows status and recommendations ‘of JT with respect to the cngoing 8 investigations and | inquiry of NAB as well as 3 x quashed / oquitted references: ~ Bei. | Case Tide ‘legations [Current Status [ITs hw. recommendations ‘| Investigation Against | Purchase of [Investigation under | The entire Panama Mian Mubamnmad | Aventield process since las | Case primarily revolves Nawaz Sharif | properties no. 17-18 years with around the allegations Regarding 16, 16A, 17 and | no tangible | on the basis of which “Acquisition/Purehase | 17A London | progress. this investigation was SRY Cey ~2 of Tonden Properties (Assets Beyond known Souees of icone Case) (Assets Beyond Known sources of income) “athorized Had this case be conducted ina professional manner, the Panama issue had been addressed many years ago. But the case has been abnormally delayed by the successive NAB. authorities since its authorization, ‘Though the Investigation of this ‘matter was authorized on 27.12.1999 but despite the lapse of about 18 years, the ease remained pended for most of the time on one pretext or other and not a single evidence related to Avenfield propertios and sources of finds has even boon collected by NAB. However, Sulficent evidence and material hus now come on record during the proceedings of the Honorable Supreme Court and JIT, which bas a direst nexus with the NAB investigations Its thus recommended that NAB be dirested to complete the investigation without ay further delay. GIT.‘Analysis along with relevant documents enclosed at Annecure-A) Tavestgation Against | Mian Nawaz Mian Muhammad | Sharif and his [Nawaz Sarit and family have been ‘others regarding | alleged to have acquisition of tani | purchased? through coercion in/ | acquied land ia around —Raiwant | different mouzas (Assets beyond | in Ralwvand known Sources. cf| which is dis- income) proportionate to their known sources of Investigation is under process since 29-02-2000 “This investigation is under process with NAB since 29-2-2000 fon the allegations of acquisition of land by Sharif Family through coercion inround Raiwand which is disproportionate to their known sources of No worthwhile progress has been made and despite the lapse of | about 17 to 18 years, the case remtined pended for most of the time on one pretext oF other, tis rocommended that this investigation may be finalized without any further delay of time, Further if the honorable Supreme Court allows to reopen the reference / investigation against Raivand Estate then this case be clubbed with the said reference ‘on its reopening, (IT Analysis along with relevant documents enclosed at Annexure. B Tivestigaion Against | Allegedly Mian Tavestgation ‘The NAB___may‘Mian Maammad ‘Nawaz Shavif for rrisusing bis authority a construction of Roa! to Raiwand Estate. ‘Mohammad Nawaz Shari misused his authority in dioeting the funds of Zila Council in constriction of road leading to Raivand estate wheres, this project was not included inthe ‘authorized on 17 04.2000, but stil under process. complete he investigation on priority without any further delay based on merits ofthe ease pla, Investigation Again | Receiving of investigation of | The case was delayed ‘Mian Muhammad | erores of Rupees | the matter was | by NAB without any Nawaz Sharif and} through ‘authorized on} justification and no others in the matter | underhand 31.03.2000 and is | serious efforts have of Sharif Tust | methods using tillunder process. | been made so far for Sharif Trust, the collection of enami Assets evidence, since sre being held in authorization of ease in the name of March 2000 Sharif Trust by NAB be directed to Sharif Family take all steps necessary to complete the investigation in shortest possible time GET Analysis along with relevant documents enclosed at Anmexure-C) Investigation Against | Audited Tavewtigaton ito [This investigation may ‘Mian Muhmmad | Financia the matter was | be merged with Nawaz, Sarit and other regarding assets beyond knows, sources of incom: (lenami investments jn Hudabiya Enga. Company) Statements of Hudabiys Engg. ‘Company of year 1995.96 show share equity of Rs, 69 million by Sheik ‘authorized on 12.02.2000 however since then the case is pending with NAB. The allegations being investigated in this investigation related t0 udabiye papers Mills Reference on its. re opening if deemed fi bby Honorable Supreme Court, GIT Analysis alongwith relevant25 Zakaudin, Te has disowmed this. investment Hence Rs. 68 million are ‘unaccounted for. investigation ‘sooms to have been covered in reference no. 5 of 2000 (State Vs Hudabiya Paper Mills) but this investigation — is being shown 35 separate by NAB. ‘documents enclosed at Anmesure-D) Tvestgation againt Mian Mubarnmal Nawaz Shari regarding. misuse of ‘authority in illegal appointments in FIA. Tiegedly Mi Muhammad Nawaz Sharif misused his ‘authority in sppointment of 42 employees on dllerent posts in FIA. These appointments were made on contract basis in Investigation oF the mater was authorized in year 1999 anda ‘complete report of the investigation officer along with available on record. NAB is keeping this case pending despite NAB may be dived to finalize the case expeditiously on merit GIT Analysis along with relevant documents enclosed at dnmexuresE) violation of servieo rus and procedure, apparently has no Justification Tx Inquiry and Or | Man ‘Several inquiries | NAB may be Grecod investigations Muhammad | and investigation | to fialize the cases against Mian | Nawaz Sharif in| on the allegations | expeditiously. GIT Muhammad Nawaz | the capacity of | of illegal | Analysis along. with Shatit for illeal| Chief Minister allotments of plas | relevant documents allotments of plos in| Punjab misused | were authorized by | enclosed at LDA his authority in| NAB in year 2000 | Anmexure-D) allotment of | and were entrusted plots to different | to Anticorruption beneficiaries in | establishment violation and Punjab. Some of| rales of them, were allotment. finalized by ACE and. their26 investigation reports are available on record snd some were stil under process when they were transfered back 10 NAB. All these inquires and investigation are pending since then and no efforts have been made by NAB for their isposal on mei. Apparently no justification is available on record for such an inordinate delay. NAB References Acquitied/Quashed recommended to be re-opened ‘State Vs Mian Mubammad Nawaz Sharif and Saif ue Rehman(Reference No. 2 0f2000,) ‘Assets Disproportionate known sources of Purchase of, Helicopter by Mian Mubarnmad Nawaz Shai which was not declared in his income and wealth statement which he could ‘not tecoust foe Reference no 2 of [NAB may be ordered ‘2000 was filed in| to review the cage and ‘Accountability | file an appeal before Court Attock Fort | Supreme Court for and Trial was |assailing the orders of conducted, Misn | the Honorable Lahore ‘Mubacamad| Court keeping in view "Nawaz. Sharif was | the ‘wvailable convicted i the | incriminating evidence, case to 14 year RI] use of ftke Qatari and fine. Howover, | connection and non- the conviction was | availabilty of fnancist set aside by Lahore | resources by the High Cour vide its | accused, to purchase order dated 13.09-| te helicopter. GET 2010 in writ| Analysis along with Petition No. 2-B of | relevant documents 2009. Appeal | enclosed at Against decision | Annexure-G) was not filed byv WAR. ‘late Ver Hadabips | Mi Reference no. 5 of [A detailed report on Papers Mills and| Mubammad | 2000 was filed by | this case with others (Reference | Nawaz Sharif | NAB in | additional evidence in No.50f2000) and ——otber | Accountability | the form of a stand- directors of | Cour. ‘The | alone report has been Hudabiya Papers | reference was | submitted separately. Mills and adjourned sine dic | NAB may be ordered ‘Associated | since the accused | to file an appeal before companies have | was not available | Supreme Court received huge/ in the country. On | assaiting the oners of share deposits | rotum of the | the Honorable Lahore fiom unknown | accused, a writ | Court keeping in view sources which Aisproportionate to their known soures of] petition’ no. 2617 of 2011 was filed by the accused in Honorable Lahore High Court, Two- member bench of Lahore high Court give a split judgement and the matter was referred to Referee judge forthe decision that whether the reference be quashed or mater be refened to NAB for re investigation. ‘The referee judge quashed the reference vide its order ete 11.03.2014, NAB didnot file appeat ageinst the decision of High Cour. the ffesh, very strong ‘and comprehensive documentary evidence, money trail and banking recon GIT Analysis along with relevant documents enclosed at Annexure HD28 ‘State Ve Mian [Allegedly Mian [Mater was [NAB ray be ordered Muarnmad Nawas | Shas, Mst.| refered by NAB | to review the case and Sharif, Mian Sharif| Shamim Akbter|to FIA for| file an appeal before and -Mst. Shamim | and Mian investigation. On| Supreme Court for Akder—(Referene: | Muhammad | completion _of | essailing the orders of, 1No.70f2000) | Nawaz Sharif investigation athe. Honorable Lafiore Constructed — | reference no. | Court keeping in view Palatal 12000 was filed | the availble Buildings by NAB in| incriminating evidence Mansions and| Accountability | and matter be referred houses in cour, which was| for re-investgation as Raivand Estate| sine die adjourned | evaluation reports of| which were | due to non-| the propesties by arossly availbilty of | NESPAK viz a viz the Aisproportionate | accused in the-| financial resources. of| to their known | country. When the | Sharif family as per sources of | accused rotumed | their tox record are income. Huge | they filed a writ | grossly sums of money/| petition no. | disproportionate and were invested in] 2619/2011 in| remained un-explined these buildings | Lahore High | by the Shari family. which are un] Court. The court Further ongoing cases secounted for. | Quashed the | with NAB on the same reference. NAB issue may be merged did not file any) with this case if re- appeal against the | investigation is decision of High | allowed. (JIT Analysis Court slong with relevant documents enclosed stds D ‘eI Addition the cases mentioned above there is another case which has not been initiated by NAB despite availabilty of recond with NAB. This case pertains to a “Trust” established in USA. As per avalable documents 6x companies of Sharif fauily entered into an agreement with this “Trust” for provision of security 10 banks in Pakistan on behalf of these companies so that companies could get loans against this security, Ths case scoms to have sttong connection with M 1 6aFPaper Mills case, hence NAB may be directed that cither a separate case be initiated or this matter may be merged with the Hudabiya Paper Mill cas, if reopened. (HT Analysis along with relevant documents enclosed at Annexure: 2 3. Analysis and Recommendations on FIA Cases. The scrutiny of record petaning to ‘the two FIRS as highlighteé below, shows that Honorable Lahore High Court only discussed the Jurisdiction of FIA regarding conducting investigations into the mallers of foreign currency sccounts of private individvals however, question regarding existence of the individuals in who's ame fake accounts were opened was not adequately addressed. It has been further noted that these cases have also been quashed without conducting a proper tial and without giving ‘evidence a chance to come on record. Since these two cases ae linked with chain of events ger offence which has been thoroughly elaborated by NAB in its reference whiet are part of | ‘ho, 5 of 2000 the JIT recaramends that these two cases may also be opened and may be linked with case of Hudabiye Paper Mills (which has already been requested by JIT to be opened) so that » complete picture could be drawn regarding the transactions made of Shari family in connection with accumulation of assets and money laundering. Ber, [Title of the case | Allegations ‘Carrent Status | Recommendations No. of IT [FIR No, 1271994 Obtaining of | Aller investigation [The case may be case agniast| wrongful gain by | of the matter challan | re-opened and Hodabiya Mian Mubarmmad | ws 173 CePC was | merged with case Engineering Pvt.| Nawaz Shari | fled By FIA before | of Hudabiya Paper Ls. though obtaining |Special Judge | Mills. on its Joon for Hudabiya | Cental, During the | opening if deem fit Engineering Pvt. | pendency of ‘Trial |by Honorable Ld, by opening two writ pettions | Supreme Court of fake and fictitious | (1217797 and | Pakistan. GIT. accounts in| 1217397 were filed | Analysis along different banks and |by the sccused for| with relevant depositing black | quashment of | documents money in these |Challan, Petitions | enclosed _at0 ‘acount through foreign remittances. (FIR ws 419,420,468,471, and 109 PPC iw were accepted by Lahore High Court and Challan was ‘quashed vide order dated 12.06.1997. [No appeal was filed See SQ)47 PCA by FIA against the and aricle 3 of| decision of Lahore holders ‘of | High Court representative office) FIR No, 15/1994 | Obtaining of | ARer investigation | The ease may be Against ‘wrongful gain by| ofthe mater challan| re-opened and iudéabiya Pape:| Mian Mubammad | ws 173 CrPC was] merged with case Mills Pvt| Nawaz Sharif by | filed By FIA before | of Hudabiya Paper Limited obtaining loan for| Special Judge [Mills on its Huddabiya paper Mills pvt. Le. ‘Through opening fake and fititious accounts in dierent banks and positing black money in these| scoounts dough feign remittances. (FIR Ws 419,420,468,471, ‘and. 109 PPC. cw Sec 5@M7 PCA and adicle 3. of| holders of representative office) Central, During the pendency of ‘Trial two wait petitions (217287 and 12173197 were filed by the accused for quashment of Callan, Petitions were accepted by Lahore High Court sand Challan was ‘quashed vide order dated 12.06.1997, No appeal was filed by FIA against the decision of Lahore High Cou. ‘opening if deem ft by Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan Analysis al ar long, ‘with relevant documents ‘enclosed Annexure) at4 Analysis and Recommendations on SECP Cases a Seratiny fof the record received fiom SECP Showed that the investigation related to Chavdhry Sugar Mills was closed by officers of SECP in connivance with each other and with mala fide itensions and despite the ‘ct thatthe observations suised by SECP vide their letter dated 30.11.2012 were not addressed by Chaudhry Sugar Mills but st the matter was covered up by officers of SECP and investigation was shown to have been closed in back dats ie, 14.01.2013. JIT is ofthe opinion the matter related to Chauchry Sugar Mill was since closed by SECP prematurely with mala fide intention, hence, resommends the re-opening of the case Ser: [Tite of the case | Allegations | Current Status ‘Recommendations No. ors ‘a [Investigation Tavesigation | Tavestigation ws 263 of| Though the Against against Companies Ordinance was | observations raised Chaudry Sugar | Chaudhry | initiated by SECP against by SECP were not Mills Sugar Mills | Chaudhry Sugar Mis, The | addressed but in was company did not provide| June 2016, the conducted by| the complete record to] investigation was SECP on the| investigation team despite | abruptly closed in allegations of| repeated requests and buck dates on Suspicions of letters and observations 14,1.2013. The Money rnised by the investigation date selection for Jaundering | officers were not removed | closure i and however ia May J Sune| apparently to iserepancies | 2016, the investigation was | reflect that case in their annua | abruptly closed in. back]| was independently sndited dates of 2013, despite the | closed 8 seeounts. | fact the observations raised | Respondent No. 1 by SECP were pending was not in power fon this particulartie aT recommends that the investigation may be re-opened, (IT Analysis along with relevant ‘documents enclosed at Anmessre-M) —— ae —_33 ‘Table of Annexures ‘Analjsis and Recommendations of JIT on NAB, FIA and SECP Cases Ser, Particulars ‘Annexure Number No. 1. | Tnvestigation Against Mian Muhamnmad Nawaz Shavit Regacding | Annexare-A AcquisttiowPurchsse of London Properties (Assets Beyond known Sources of come Case) Z| investigation Against Mian Muhammad Nawae Shacif sad oihers | Annexure regarding acquisition of land through coercion in / around Raivand (Assets beyond known Sources of income) 3. | Investigation Agsist Mian Muhammad Nawae Sharif and others | Annexure-C | inthe matter of Shai Trust “| Investigation Against Mian Mohammad Nawaz Sheaf and others | AnnexareD inthe matter Hudabiya Engineering Company Pvt Ltd. [Investigation Against Mian Mohammad Nawaz Sharif and oihers | Annexure for misusing their authority and Megal Appointovents in FIA. 5.” | ix foquiry and 2« vestigation Against Mian Muhammad Nawaz | Annexare-F Sharif and others in the matte pertaining to illegel Allotment of| Pots in Lahore Development Authority. | Reference No. 2 of 2000 against Mian Miuhamad Nawaz Sharif | Annexure-G + | and Stifur Rehman Regarding Purchase of M-8 Helicopter from, Russia (Assets Beyond known Sources of income Case) 7. | Reference No. 30° 2000 against Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif} Annexare-Ht ‘and others regarding unaccounted for amounts reflected in accounts of Hudabiya Paper Mills B [Reference No. 7 of 2000.Coripiion and’ Comupt Practices | ~~ AnnexureT committed by Starif Family by making investments in Construction of Paatial mansions and buildings in Shami farm, Raiwand Lahore(Assets Beyond Known Sources of Income) 9. | Authorizaiion of Inquiry by NAB in the matter of a*Trust” inthe | Annexuresd ‘name ofa Saudi Nstional Abdul Gani TO. | IA CASE-FIR No. 1271904 case against Hudhbiya Engineering | AnnexareK Pvt. Li Ti [RTA CASE Fit No. 19/1094 case against Fiudabiya Paper Mills | Annesuro-t Pvt Lid T2__| SEGP CASE Investigation Against Chaudhry Sugar Mills Annexurememes 34 | TT _______ Tavesigaton Against Mion Mihammad Nawaz Sharif Regarding ‘Acguisition/Purchase of London Properties (Assets Beyond known, Sours of income Case) Daicof 27121999 Authorization of investigation Date of Filling of | Invesigation Under process reference ‘Allegations Parclase of Avenfield Proparies no. 16, 16A, 17 and 17A London (Assets Beyond known sources of income) “Fecasedl perzona | Mian Muhammad Nawaz, Sharif Prime Minster and Shari Family ‘Brief Facts ar On 31-05-2000 Chairman NAB refered the matter for ‘vestigation to DG FIA tobe conducted apsinst Sharif family on the allegations of ownership of Avenfield flats no. 16, 16A, 17 sm 17A, Pak Lane London which ae being maintained through offre companies, ‘The above said flats were. reportedly purchased trough Urs Specker during peti from 1993 to 1996 ‘where Mr Hussain Nawaz Sharif hed been residing. These asots ‘npeat to be disproportionate to the knowa sources of income of| Stacf Family 'b, The said investigation was based ona petition filed by Me. Shee ‘Nacki, the altomey for Al- Towesk company for claiming an anount of Rs, US$ 18.673 million whereby the petitioner refered the report of FIA prepared by Mr. Rehman Malik wherein Mian Muhammad Nawaz, Sharif, Mim Mubammad Shabbz Sharif and Mian Mohammad Abbas Sharif were alleged fo having interests in property units situated at Pask Lane Tondoa through Offshore companies c. FIA requested NAB that cotifiod copies of record pertaining to these propetes, Bank Statements relating to foreign accounts ‘nd ovmersip tecord of companies registered at British Virgin ‘land would be required to draw a link between the said operties and Sharif brothers so the investigation report as rected by Chairman NAB could be prepared by the 10. 14. The investigation wis tetured to NAB hy FIA and remained peedng till 04-11-2016 when the investigation was authorized t0 ‘ew 10, Thete after no major efforts have been made by NAD for callection of further recordevidence “Carreat Status | Tvestigation is ail under process with no tangible progress ‘Conclusion, “The properties higlghted in this investigation are infact the same‘a the basis of which pimatily, the Honorable Supreme Court tok cognizance of the Panama ease and made e JIT on the mater Tavestigtion vas authorized in 1999 and the ease is pending with ‘NAB since then, The case remained pending on one pretext or the other and no serious effort have been found on record which could ‘sige seriousnes of the department to conduct the investgstion No efforts for procurement of record from abroad have been made. [Neither any MLA request has been lodged by the NAB nor the respondents have been approached for recording their plea and feekirg information. Apparenly, no conclusive effort bas been made by NAB despite «lapse of about 17-18 years to finalize the investigation proceedings. Recommendations Th view of recent developments in Honorable Supreme Cout of Pakistm and JIT, ample evidence is now availble on record. NAB ‘may be directed to look into the matter and complete the ease on merit without further delay 36“hub ba CE contidensish Spee (i) PDE, PHGRTGARTON AGEUCK (Becnonts Orines Vins) 1 .80/02/395/981/0 27.3, pateds 012-97 revaiainrennussiinine 2, eam ELaeeeaste ¢ ums OQEES.puONE oF DTORTAMT CAE te aettes of oven aaber dated 06-1299 on the subsect, ie Ag eqieatet thet Hatiorat AcouuntabiLity Bares uy kindly scoord forse approvek to prepare Roresences $8 the! fottowing casoet~ AD; rsa zopeigfints en 3 percent ey aaMiiensgs si). Tetioopter ease of Mian Howes Shari AO) Biitaane Gy Bes Seie-arctehnes hans 1») Masses lend oma of SeitercBeban Mise 4 iaganayzoper wins oF Him tes Sarit‘our executive's SecreTARIAT NATIONAL ASCOUNTABILTY BUREAU TSLAMABAD Subject: else anil Fume Pine Mina Navas Shot eardng (onion Popes heels sau Ne. eters EOW, Fae Later Na, ECICTII7N0073, data 11% DOeceag 1050 on he above mrtioned subject. tht a investiga Ue feaured be eondcted ins he suc by FA, arabad 2 “he cata ha bon ean inthe Nant Accunltly Buco rat sonar be ins face canes sr Secon THC (ote National ‘Resouty urea Ordnance, 1900 re masa 2 1s rogues to nominate suitable Init Offa to cary cut ocossaryinengon rots complaint an sti he frost lngth nln of wlasees, ee a ho ount ot > wordhgingls inns ov 4 ae . Fecal << akira oneal G.. ‘Muhammad [mean vialsroms nage ncicr tj @ Nara( poacunons Dae 6429 (urfsentoe Sexes SUNIECT: IREEARSTION DEREEERENCE AGAASST ‘SIAR Hao fONFIGN ASSETS he pier fied y Nuon Ascouay Dro ud ing 0 etion dy Set Nar ary SA To Company ze Sh ly fas ay tmnt) op i. fer ian Poesia ci ero sexe Se aa i cleo Sree i et martes Si al ee or ees ae Some were raining Le ee a eee a rs SUNS 4 ‘he pion an its ees ila tv oobi am Lond be 4 ied ma FSi green of hc on Pls ae ot © ‘he pipes ried fom NAB a thrfr, renmed, wih he ove 5 coat satel at indy hve he ope elaine Sac tove. Tecnu) mut Poin 0 cs Be ‘nds Of geno ac ae Peon mom Rtn A SD, wich a. ane a a a igh Gower atin i ei [Shrek Agwtes eie ees =ug execurive secur NAPIONAL ACEDUYCADILATY BUREAD eat | Me 200, te elooe sd arin Tondo 16, 1 ad 1A, Pt fame US$ 50 itn pee ‘econ Mine Sl iit wh ting, duh sor senate, The 7 Wis woh ot Ave ace Show aid twas wee reply gecttel Pou _« Us Spock dag he pod TDMDH8S whore Me cis Sir Ste ane ot At ao be sg ant ome vali esis ere il nis, The oes ome hou op sir rea bs Capi an he ao as sues stwittty,/ ‘Yin esis ope have geo cond ns te se sation raya erases Nien Acne aren ee “hen-mUERAt moRRGAaTON Aono (pooner cares ¥rH0) No.P.2ca/oe-Bo/ 37 70-7) davear 2 whe ” ‘unypon: AYENYZEID FROFERETES LoNDOH. L332. jasernopenetiation) Daten 9080 ° ” indy rofer'to the Oaisaan UB's Letter tosnoy/spn(ath) tet 345.2000 the eaderte it a7 id 2 ‘Ae eequésted easiion vide thts Agency's Letter HonP-2(54)/SB-20U/ 10025 ated 9412,2099 (ony enclosed), certified doounente will bave to be obtained fron the origintl sources to prepare @ Reference, It ia therefore, zequested that certisiad copies of the docments nay kindly be provided to the Investigating Officer to prepare the vequisite Retenences NO-AS6. fame PRB Foe Dr Be Copy, to Desuty Director SU, 11 tonenabed with, rofenenet’ to’ onde I Letter ho sbO/OE/S7S/e0 Son EEtes"sfe2oo0, cigaewien acooyy ef halssen Radha Sforeaentiened aeteer and {e8 tcloattess it sens ts ane pS te man sen: Le weubamntnon waza Dress Denier corre