Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ENGLAND HOCKEY 0
ENGLAND HOCKEY
LONG TERM ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION
CONTENTS
1 Introduction Page
What is Long Term Athlete Development (LTAD)?
What are the potential benefits of LTAD to hockey?
2-4
What are the implications of adopting LTAD for hockey?
Does hockey need LTAD?
5 Appendices Page
Appendix 1 Weaknesses of current systems and structures
Appendix 2 Generic Long Term Athlete Development model
10-15
Appendix 3 draft LTAD hockey model
ENGLAND HOCKEY 1
ENGLAND HOCKEY
LONG TERM ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION
1. INTRODUCTION
ENGLAND HOCKEY 2
ENGLAND HOCKEY
LONG TERM ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION
vital for retaining interest in a sport and for being successful in the long term. However, whilst
young players are still developing their skills, competition should be used as a tool to aid players
learning and development, rather than winning being the main objective. To illustrate, even if a
team has superior tactics to their opponents in a match, they probably wont beat their
opposition unless their players have the basic skills with which to apply the tactics successfully!
young people should be encouraged to develop good basic movement skills at an early age and
participate in a wide variety of sports before specialising in hockey, because this will enhance
their hockey playing ability in the long term. For example, it is noticeable that young girls who
take up hockey having had some experience of playing football are often more aware of issues
such as running off the ball to make space than those that have not
efforts must be made to account for the different physical and psychological maturation rates of
young people by ensuring that fitness development is, as far as possible, based on the needs of
the individual, i.e. be athlete centred. For hockey, this would mean that whilst development of
hockey skills would best be delivered with players remaining in peer groups, development of
fitness should be according to players individual needs.
1.7 An understanding of LTAD principles and the content of the draft LTAD hockey model demonstrates
the potential of LTAD to act as a catalyst for change of systems and structures in hockey if fully
adopted. The complexities of the relationships between policy and implementation would be significant,
and the following areas of the game could be significantly influenced.
a. Player pathways interrelationships between schools, clubs, counties, regions and international
b. Roles and responsibilities in the game a review to enhance effectiveness, reducing duplication
and filling gaps in provision
c. Coaching structure and system changing emphasis for player development at younger ages to
be individually focussed within team context; review tiered qualification structure; education
through continuous professional development
d. Competition structure and system, and calendar planning providing appropriate, locally
accessible opportunities to support player development; structured to support the desired
outcomes at each stage of a players development
e. Club structure and system making more effective use of clubs in young player development,
recognising their crucial role in retaining players in hockey in the long term
f. Player assessment and management developing a consistently applied approach nationwide at
all levels, with everyone playing their part in Team England
g. Corporate planning and funding significant NGB backing required both philosophically and with
resources to achieve desired outcomes through a long term plan for implementation
The way in which these areas of the game could be influenced by adopting LTAD will be the subject of
consultation later in 2005.
ENGLAND HOCKEY 3
ENGLAND HOCKEY
LONG TERM ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION
players. In short, our young players play too many matches, and train too little a better balance is
needed.
1.11 Hockey currently, along with many sports, fails to retain into adulthood many of those who experience
the game through school. Additionally, many players who achieve international recognition do so in
spite of the system rather than because of it. There are many talented players who are unable to access
the support and coaching required to reach their full potential. The Working Group has developed, for
consultation, a draft LTAD hockey model designed to be the first step in helping to address these issues.
2.2 Some readers may be familiar with the generic LTAD model from literature on the subject (see
Appendix 2). The draft LTAD hockey model differs from the generic LTAD model in a number of ways:
a. it considers athlete development from 6 25 years. This is because the research shows that
athletes in team sports do not reach their full potential until their mid-to-late 20s. This is due to
their complex nature, requiring high degrees of technical and tactical understanding
b. it is differentiated in content to cater for both elite and recreational players by incorporating a
standard and extended programme of activity where appropriate
c. it addresses particular weaknesses relating to hockey in England, and considers 4 content
strands throughout:
- physiological preparation (fitness)
- hockey specific preparation (hockey skills)
- psychological preparation (mental strength)
- lifestyle issues (balancing the needs of hockey and other commitments)
2.3 The detailed content of the draft LTAD hockey model content is contained in Appendix 3. It has
proved difficult to provide the draft model in a concise format that can also contain a narrative outlining
the reasoning for some of the proposals within it. For this reason, a summary narrative for each of the
growth and development phases is provided below, and should be read in conjunction with the draft
LTAD hockey model at Appendix 3. Rationale is also provided in the FAQs section.
ENGLAND HOCKEY 4
ENGLAND HOCKEY
LONG TERM ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION
ENGLAND HOCKEY 5
ENGLAND HOCKEY
LONG TERM ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION
ENGLAND HOCKEY 6
ENGLAND HOCKEY
LONG TERM ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION
ENGLAND HOCKEY 7
ENGLAND HOCKEY
LONG TERM ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION
3.6 Some of the demands on young players time seem very high, are they realistic?
The research shows that there are particular stages of all young peoples development that provide
optimum opportunities to develop particular aspects of their sporting ability. If these opportunities are
missed, players may not reach their full potential. Whilst some of the demands on time do seem high,
the recommendations should be viewed as a weekly programme, different elements of which may be
obtained via a number of different sources e.g. school PE, club, county or other hockey coaching, and
participation in complementary sports. There is also scope for hockey training sessions to be
structured to perform the dual function of working on aspects of fitness alongside skills.
Currently, many young sportspeople are undertaking a large amount of training and competition,
perhaps in a variety of sports. However, there is rarely a single plan for their sporting development, and
conflicts and overplaying can easily arise. It is for this reason that efforts should be made to manage
individual players sporting, academic and social commitments in order to achieve balance. This is
particularly important for talented players who may be accessing coaching via a number of different
sources, potentially in more than one sport.
It is also important to remember the 10,000 hour rule for becoming an expert performer. Those with
the ability to be elite players must also develop the commitment required to make the most of their
talents. Most sports in England have a culture where young people play too much and train too little.
It is important to develop a better training culture for hockey in England if we are to help players reach
their full potential, whether that be as a club player, or an international.
3.7 Has a decision on adopting LTAD already been made?
No. Adopting LTAD can only be truly effective if everyone involved in hockey agrees to use it as a
framework for how young players are developed. For this reason, England Hockey has agreed that the
work must not be rushed, and must be subject to widespread consultation.
3.8 Are other sports adopting LTAD?
Yes. Over 18 sports are already utilising LTAD principles in their work and plans. The LTAD
framework is included within the Governments Game Plan strategy delivery document for sport as a
means of bridging the gap between grassroots and international performance and encouraging long term
participation in sport for non-elite performers.
England Hockey has committed to giving careful consideration to adopting LTAD principles in so far as it
will help our sport develop. This is why the work is being progressed as a research project, with
appropriate levels of consultation.
3.9 Why is the draft LTAD hockey model differentiated between standard and extended
content at the Train to Compete stage
Not all players will have the potential to become elite players. The draft LTAD hockey model
recognises this by offering two levels of content from the Train to Compete stage forwards. The
extended content is aimed at those players who have been identified as potential elite performers,
whilst the standard content offers a reduced level of commitment more appropriate to the majority of
players who will form the basis of club teams of the future.
3.10 Why is the draft LTAD hockey model not differentiated before the Train to Compete
stage?
Train to Train, the stage prior to Train to Compete, is a critical stage of young peoples sporting
development, so much so that it was decided that this could not be differentiated. In addition, the
approximate ages for the start of the stage are 11 yrs for girls, and 12 years for boys. This was
considered too young to make an informed decision about whether a player had the potential to play at
a high level. It was therefore inappropriate to differentiate the content at such an early stage.
3.11 There are references to changing ratios of competition and training. What would this
mean to the existing competition structure?
This would need to be the subject of further consultation. However, there would likely be a need to
develop more opportunities for young people to play matches or competitions in less formal
festival/friendly games and in more age group competition.
ENGLAND HOCKEY 8
ENGLAND HOCKEY
LONG TERM ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION
3.12 Why does the model propose that young players shouldnt play adult hockey until at least
15/16 years of age? Surely if youre good enough, youre old enough?
The management of young players into adult hockey needs to be handled very carefully to ensure that
the experience is an enjoyable one. Research and anecdotal evidence show that this will increase the
chances of young players continuing to play hockey into adulthood.
Currently, for every young player whose progress into adult league hockey is carefully considered and
managed, there are many who are thrown in at the deep end because an adult team is short of players,
do not like the experience and are lost to the sport.
Most young players play and enjoy hockey because they make friends of their own age. Often players
who are advanced to adult league hockey because they have the playing ability to do so are taken away
from their peer group. Whilst some youngsters have the resilience to cope with this, many do not, and
are placed in an uncomfortable situation where they have the playing ability, but perhaps not the social
maturity, to thrive. There are many examples in hockey where keeping players in their peer group for
longer has been shown to yield a higher percentage of these players continuing to play for the club into
adulthood.
There is also supporting evidence regarding developing a players ability to cope with responsibility.
Many talented young players are advanced through age groups and into adult hockey at a rate at which
they are continually the youngster of the team, and as such are not expected to be the top performer,
nor take too much responsibility. Playing at an appropriate standard amongst their peers, they can
gradually learn to take responsibility and deal with the pressure of being expected to perform.
Clearly, in terms of implementation, our existing systems could not support a sudden change to a
system of youngsters playing only in peer groups. Developing sufficient peer group competition would
take many years, and would need to be a gradual change in our sport.
3.13 How would an LTAD hockey model be implemented?
Implementation could occur at many different levels. Full implementation would require alignment of all
structures and processes to the LTAD framework, and this would inevitably mean changes for our
sport. However, there are elements that could be implemented without the need for significant change.
Either way, typical implementation plans in other sports using LTAD are long term most are at least 5
year plans. Subject to the outcome of this initial phase of consultation, implementation scenarios,
setting out the implications of adopting LTAD, will be the subject of a second phase of consultation in
late 2005.
4 CONSULTATION PROCESS
4.1 Throughout the initial stages of the project development, the LTAD Working Group has made efforts
to inform those involved with hockey that an investigative research project on LTAD was underway.
Presentations and attendance at various events and meetings was designed to: inform; act as an
opportunity to assess initial reaction; and gather information and input to the research project.
4.2 Based on feedback received to date, a two phased approach to communication and consultation has
been agreed.
1) Phase 1 will concentrate on consultation on the draft LTAD hockey model content, seeking
views on the principles proposed for player development.
2) Phase 2, accounting for feedback at Phase 1, would address draft implementation proposals
Phase 1 consultation will run until 10 June 2005. Phase 2 consultation is anticipated to be launched in
late 2005.
4.3 Hockeys LTAD work has the potential to significantly influence the future of hockey in England.
Comments and views are invited from all those involved in the delivery of opportunities to play hockey.
Please respond using the proforma form to: ltad@englandhockey.org or by post
England Hockey LTAD consultation, England Hockey, National Hockey Stadium, Silbury Boulevard,
Milton Keynes, MK9 1HA or electronically via email to ltad@englandhockey.org
ENGLAND HOCKEY 9
ENGLAND HOCKEY
LONG TERM ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION
APPENDIX 1
Weaknesses of current systems and structures
Work undertaken both by the LTAD Working Group and through various previous reviews of hockey in
England have established the following weaknesses in the system and structures supporting young player
development relative to LTAD principles. In a number of areas, work is already being undertaken to address
identified weaknesses, and there are also examples of good practice where practical solutions have been found
locally to overcome some of the issues described. However, the following are included to provide an overview
of the perceived weaknesses in hockey:
Strategy, structure and environment
a. no systematic player development structure offering equality of access at all stages. This results
in players progression becoming a lottery based upon location and circumstances, including the
degree of parental support received
b. lack of overarching strategy and guidance in the development of young hockey players
c. lack of funding for player development at the grassroots
d. lack of clarity in relation to roles and responsibilities in young player development leading to
ineffective use of resources
e. inconsistent system of talent identification nationally, aligned too closely to squad performance
at competitions, resulting in short term attitudes to assessment situations
f. traditional reliance on the education sector to introduce hockey and develop players. The
reduction in extra-curricular sport and the growing variety of sporting opportunities offered to
students is a threat to the inclusion of hockey in schools
g. under utilisation of club and further/higher education to support player development and
retention of players into adulthood
h. largely unstructured club system that has evolved to meet the demands of the competition
structure. This results in ineffective use of their resources, and often inappropriate
competition between clubs for young players
i. rivalry between sports for young peoples time
j. lack of strategic co-ordination in relation to facility development and use
Player development focus
a insufficient quality junior development within clubs linked effectively to schools
b too much emphasis on competition at a young an age, resulting in a play too much, train too
little culture, especially for talented players, who are often over played
c lack of an integrated system or effective mechanisms for managing talented players results in
tug-of-war situations occurring between schools, clubs, counties, regions etc.
d current assessment systems rely heavily on selecting age group squads, usually to enter
competitions. This can discriminate against players who are:
- late physical developers
- playing at the wrong school/club etc
- competing against players who are better in their position due to the emphasis on
winning
- less experienced in hockey i.e. those with less exposure to quality coaching, perhaps
because they dont attend a hockey playing school or play for a club with a poor coaching
structure
- latecomers to the sport and may have potential but are weaker than their peers
currently
e. current player development typically
- encourages early specialisation in hockey which means a lost opportunity to develop
broader games sense and learn skills through experiencing other games
- fails to utilise effectively the identified stages of development to optimise sporting
potential
- has no mechanism or guidance on the development of basic (FUNdamental) movement
skills or basic sports specific skills at an early age
- pays insufficient attention to developing physiological attributes, psychological and
lifestyle skills
ENGLAND HOCKEY 10
ENGLAND HOCKEY
LONG TERM ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION
Competition
a. too much emphasis on competition at a young age, resulting in outcome focussed approach to
coaching (winning in the short term becomes more important than performing and training well
over the long term)
b. a lack of structured junior competition accessible locally leading to inappropriate, accelerated
progression to adult hockey
c. the traditional strength of competitions in the sport has led to a competition driven player
development environment i.e. a team is developed because there is a competition to enter,
rather than forming appropriate competition structures to better complement long term player
development
d. regional inconsistencies in provision for boys and girls
Coaching
a. a lack of clear guidance for coaches on how to develop young players i.e. develop core skills,
assess ability, assess potential etc.
b. the vertical coach education system assumes that better coaches will work with better players
and teams, and/or older age groups. This results in a lack of quality coaches working with
athletes at the most important period of their development which is from 10-16 years. The
system currently has no means of recognising coaching excellence in work with young people,
with the exception of competition results
c. coaching success is most often defined by outcomes of matches/tournaments etc i.e. whether
the team wins. It is difficult to define success in terms of developmental outcomes
d. lack of quality, suitably qualified coaches in hockey
e. opportunities for coaches to progress are limited by cost, selection mechanisms for higher level
courses etc
f. lack of quality assurance within coaching through a licensing system or equivalent
g. competition driven playing structure results in:
- perception that coaches do not want to share knowledge
- lack of focus on individual player development because coaching is team driven
- lack of collaboration between coaches due to team focus
ENGLAND HOCKEY 11
ENGLAND HOCKEY
LONG TERM ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION
APPENDIX 2
Generic Long Term Athlete Development Model
Notes
1. FUNdamentals, Learn to Train etc. are descriptive terms adopted for the identifiable stages development to provide a common LTAD
language. It is intended to be broadly descriptive of the relative objectives at each stage e.g. emphasising training over competitive
outcomes at the early stages. These terms are not obligatory. Swimming, for example, uses Swimskills instead of Learn to Train.
2. These are indicative chronological ages. Ideally, developmental maturity should be used as a means of determining the emphasis of an
individuals training
ENGLAND HOCKEY 12
ENGLAND HOCKEY
LONG TERM ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION
APPENDIX 3
Draft LTAD hockey model
Page 1 of 3
Stage of Ages Objectives for development Training Other issues
development Physiological Hockey specific Psychological Lifestyle characterised (including
by competition)
FUNdamentals M 6-9 yrs - Basic movement skills:
Agility, balance, &
- Emphasis on fun
- Introduction to simple
- Ensure that motor
learning issues are adopted
- Introduce the basics of:
good cultural/lifestyle
- Emphasis on fun
- Encourage daily activity
- No formal competition
- Encourage game play
Learning F 6-8 yrs co-ordination sports skills through hockey into coaching practise habits for sports people (formal or informal) experience in variety of
FUNdamental - Some basic sports skills:
running, jumping, throwing,
and other sports, especially
striking activities to
- Introduction to ethics and
rules
nutrition/hydration
recovery
- Encourage participation
in many different sports
sports, emphasis on
learning
movement skills kicking, striking promote hand-eye co- - Begin parental education - Max 2 x hockey pw
- Development of speed ordination about these issues - Session length 45mins
technique - use of structured - No periodisation1
- Introduction to core programmes
stability
- Principles of warm-up &
cool down
ENGLAND HOCKEY 13
ENGLAND HOCKEY
LONG TERM ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION
Page 2 of 3
Stage of Ages Objectives for development Training Other issues
development Physiological Hockey specific Psychological Lifestyle characterised (including
by competition)
Train to M 16-18 Extended content
As for standard content, As for standard content, - Refining decision making - optimise understanding of - Fitness training to - Ratio of 50% training to
Compete (1) F 15-17 but frequency and intensity but frequency and intensity abilities in game situations performance lifestyle account for strength 50% competition
Refining skills for reflects needs of talented
performer
reflects needs of talented
performer
- Continued development
of mental preparation skills
nutrition/hydration
recovery
development phase
4-6 fitness sessions
- Competition used to
reinforce learning, but
particular events - core stability appropriate for competitive tapering and peaking - 5-6 x hockey pw becoming more outcome
and competitions to needs of performer
- to include active recovery
environment
- Development of
- use of individual
management to balance
- Session length 90-120
mins
driven
- Overall activity ratios:
determined by individual appropriate attitudes to demands - Participation in 1 50% hockey
diagnostics competition aims, becoming - ongoing parental complementary sport 40% fitness
more outcome focussed education and involvement - Double or triple 10% other sports
in lifestyle management periodisation
Standard content
- Major fitness development - Maintain training in many - Refining decision making - ongoing education on 3 x 30 min fitness through - Ratio of 50% training to
phase for strength different positions to avoid abilities in game situations lifestyle issues physical activity 50% competition
- Fitness and recovery specialisation (except GKs) - Continued development - encourage use of 2-3 x hockey pw - Competition used to
programme tailored to - Modelling training and of mental preparation skills individual management to - Session length 90-120 reinforce learning, but
individual competition needs to for competitive balance demands mins becoming more outcome
- knee and ankle stability account for periodisation environment driven
- hockey specific core - Preparation under - Overall activity ratios:
stability maintenance competitive conditions 50% hockey
- Emphasis on technical and 40% fitness
tactical preparation, event 10% other sports
and position specific as
required
- ongoing assessment and
selection
Standard content
As Train to Compete 1 As Train to Compete 1 As Train to Compete 1 As Train to Compete 1 As Train to Compete 1 As Train to Compete 1
ENGLAND HOCKEY 14
ENGLAND HOCKEY
LONG TERM ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION
Page 3 of 3
Stage of Ages Objectives for development Training Other issues
development Physiological Hockey specific Psychological Lifestyle characterised (including
by competition)
Train to Win (1) M 21-25 Extended content
- High intensity, high - Programme tailored to - Programme tailored to - monitor performance - 4-6 fitness sessions - Ratio of 25% training to
Maximising F 21-25 volume training needs of individual athlete needs of individual athlete lifestyle - 6-8 x hockey pw 75% competition
performance in - Continued strength,
endurance and speed
- Continued development
of technical and tactical
- Advanced mental
preparation modelled to
- individual management
programme
- Session length 90-180
mins
- Competition becomes
outcome driven
competition development skills account for periodisation - Double, triple or multiple - Overall activity ratios:
- Programme tailored to - Technical and tactical periodisation 65% hockey
individual preparation tailored to 35% fitness
- Physical preparation peak for major
tailored to peak for major competitions
competitions - Ongoing assessment and
- Frequent breaks in selection
programme for recovery
- Daily active recovery
Standard content
- Fitness and recovery - Preparation under - application of mental - encouraging a healthy 3 x 30 min fitness through - Ratio of 25% training to
programme to maintain competitive conditions preparation skills for lifestyle physical activity 75% competition
conditioning - Emphasis on technical and competitive environment 1-3 x hockey pw - Competition becomes
- hockey specific core tactical preparation for - Session length 90-180 outcome driven
stability maintenance specific competitions mins - Overall activity ratios:
- ongoing assessment and - Potentially reverts to 65% hockey
selection single periodisation 35% fitness
reflecting a more
recreational nature of
competition
Train to Win (2) M 25+ Extended content
As Train to Win 1 As Train to Win 1 As Train to Win 1 As Train to Win 1 - 4-6 fitness sessions - Ratio of 25% training to
Maximising F 25+ - 6-8 x hockey pw 75% competition
performance in - Session length 90-180
mins
- Competition becomes
outcome driven
competition - Double, triple or multiple - Overall activity ratios:
periodisation 70% hockey
30% fitness
Standard content
As Train to Win 1 As Train to Win 1 As Train to Win 1 As Train to Win 1 As Train to Win 1 As Train to Win 1
1
Periodisation this is the division of a calendar year into specific phases of preparation, competition and rest. During the preparation phase, the
emphasis is on training in readiness for competition. A double periodised year would have two cycles of these phases, i.e. preparation-competition-
rest-preparation-competition-rest.
ENGLAND HOCKEY 15