Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:449930 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for
Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines
are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company
manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as
providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee
on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive
preservation.
Introduction
According to Tauber (1972), consumer behavior consists of three distinct activities: Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing
shopping, buying, and consuming. Considerable progress has been achieved in and Logistics
Vol. 19 No. 4, 2007
identifying behavioral dimensions of buying and a number of theories on buying pp. 331-348
behavior have been postulated. However, much less is known about the determinants # Emerald Group Publishing Limited
1355-5855
of consuming and shopping behavior. Moreover, consumer research has historically DOI 10.1108/13555850710827841
APJML examined consumers in Western countries. Clearly, consumers in non-Western and
19,4 developing countries, such as Malaysia, for example, are also of substantial theoretical
and managerial importance.
Shopping behavior is a distinctive form of consumer behavior (Assael, 1987). The
more common shopping contexts or episodes are shopping for groceries, household
items, clothing, and gifts. Shopping behaviors are context specific; the motives and
behaviors evident when a consumer is shopping for gifts are not the same as those
332 exhibited when the consumer shops for groceries, for example (Dholakia, 1999). And,
individual consumers motives and attitudes towards shopping often vary
significantly.
For some consumers, shopping represents the prospect of picking up a bargain; for
Downloaded by Tunku Abdul Rahman University College At 03:14 12 June 2017 (PT)
shopping, tend not to pre-plan many of their purchases and enjoy eating out, often
performing more activities and spending more time shopping than non-recreational
shoppers (Boedeker, 1995).
Arguably, the most common site for recreational consumption is the large, enclosed
shopping malls. Shopping malls represent a unique form of shopping environment.
Malls have become a social place in which people converge to engage not only in
buying activities, but also in social activities, such as going to a movie, having food or a
meal out, getting together with friends or family, hair styling, etc.
A consumers shopping orientation may offer insights into how and why he/she
shops and, more specifically, why he/she visits a particular type of retail venue,
including malls (Reid and Brown, 1996). Knowledge of the benefits, consumers seek
when visiting shopping malls, can help mall management and retail marketers to
develop shopping environments that better meet the needs of targeted consumers,
thereby increasing their satisfaction, repeat visits, and positive word of mouth.
Given that the preponderance of theories and accepted truths about shopping
behaviors are based on study and observation of mostly Western populations, an
interesting question is whether these theories and descriptions hold for non-Western
shoppers. Hence, a principal motivation for the present study is to determine, at least
preliminarily, whether non-Western shoppers (i.e. Malaysians) exhibit similar (or
dissimilar) shopping mall behaviors when contrasted with reported findings on
commonly observed Western shoppers.
another, with many offering comparable products at comparable prices. Due to the
increased crowding in the mall market space, many malls have lost their individual
profile (Boedeker, 1995). At the same time, consumer markets have become more
sharply segmented than ever before, requiring retail marketers to appeal to discrete
target groups. To gain the loyalty of shoppers, malls must appeal to consumers social
motives and experiential needs, not simply provide access to desired goods.
In response to changing consumer needs, malls have grown larger and their one-
stop convenience has expanded to include service outlets and entertainment providers.
Shopping malls today offer fast-food courts, restaurants, video arcades, movie theaters,
beauty salons, dental offices, and more. Malls have also become important meeting
places, especially for young people and seniors. Mall managers have leveraged this
trend by instituting expos, art exhibits, health screening, auto shows, and live music.
Malls are now becoming giant entertainment centers, almost to the point where their
traditional retail occupants seem secondary. Underhill (1999) observed that when you
enter a shopping mall today, you are never sure if you are in a store or a theme park.
The importance of creating a positive, vibrant, and interesting image has led
innovative marketers to blur the line between shopping and theater. Both shopping
malls and individual stores must create stimulating environments that simultaneously
allow people to shop and be entertained.
Conceptual development
Bloch et al. (1994) have identified seven dimensions of shopping malls that collectively
explain consumers motives for visiting malls. These dimensions are: aesthetics,
escape, flow, exploration, role enactment, social and convenience, and are briefly
discussed below.
Aesthetic dimension
The mall itself offers experiences that are consumable beyond the products and
services available for sale within the mall. From their inception, enclosed malls have
offered patrons the advantage of climatic comfort and freedom from the noise and
traffic that categorizes other shopping venues since a noisy environment creates a
different image than is characterized by silence or soft background music. Mall
planners are devoting increasing resources to environmental and architectural aspects
of the mall. According to Lui (1997), modern mall interiors have evolved from
comfortable to architecturally rich, with lavish materials and sophisticated design
elements. Interior design actually continues the malls image-fostering process (Loudon
and Bitta, 1993). Design features (e.g. high ceilings, flooring/carpeting, architecture,
interior landscaping, store layout), as well as physical facilities (elevators, air-
conditioning, and washrooms) all impact assessments by consumers. Architectural
elements are being used by developers to increase the drama of mall interiors and to
satisfy consumer-seeking sensory stimulation.
One recent study showed that architectural design had the strongest positive
influence on mall excitement, while interior decor had the strongest positive effect on
desire to stay (Wakefield and Baker, 1998). This same study also revealed that music
and layout were positively related to mall excitement and desire to stay. Hence, the mall
and store environment is not only about manipulating architectural design and interior
layout but also includes the use of space and the choice of surroundings, colors,
aromas, and sound. Consumers broadly evaluate malls in terms of their intangibles,
including music, colors, scents, and lighting, or atmospherics.
Research on atmospherics indicates: that light colors impart a feeling of
spaciousness and serenity and signs in bright colors create excitement (Solomon, 1994).
Additionally, some malls have successfully used restful music and warm color schemes
to encourage people to linger (Peter and Olson, 1994). More generally, shopping malls
are trying to become more conducive to sensual (aesthetic) shopping by offering
on-premises features such as bakeries, which fill the air with warm, homey scents
(Underhill, 1999). Atmospheric features are an extension of product display and are
chosen to modify buyers knowledge and mood, thereby affecting behavior, and to
APJML enhance the mall or store image to differentiate it from that of other malls and leads to
19,4 the following research proposition of similarity between Malaysian and Western
consumers:
P1. The greater a Malaysian consumers preference for aesthetic stimulation, the
greater that consumers motivation to go to a shopping mall.
consumer the opportunity for diversion from everyday life and, as such, represents a
form of recreation. Visiting a mall can provide free or low cost family entertainment
that is available without the necessity of formal dress or preplanning. The common
term browsing and the phenomenon of masses of people strolling through a shopping
mall reinforce the belief that shopping is a popular pastime. This leads to our second
research proposition:
P2. The greater a Malaysian consumers desire for escape activity, the greater that
consumers motivation to go to a shopping mall.
Flow dimension
Flow has been described as a pleasurable state of absorption that is associated with
losing track of time (Bloch et al., 1994; Lui, 1997). In some cases, malls resemble Las
Vegas casinos where consumers become isolated from cues relating to time and
weather. Flow has been described as a rare and desirable state. Thus, one may
speculate that the achievement of flow while in a mall may encourage continuation
among consumers enthusiastic about shopping in mall. Moreover, unlike many
recreational outlets, shopping malls are hospitable to people who are alone. While there
are stigmas attached to attending movies or dining out alone, visiting a mall alone is
common and free of negative associations. Mall patrons become relatively isolated
from cues relating to time and weather. If the environment or consumption activity is
sufficiently pleasant, the hours may glide by. Thus, we have:
P3. The greater a Malaysian consumers preference for flow, the greater that
consumers motivation to go to a shopping mall.
Exploration dimension
Exploration, or learning about new trends, also attracts consumers to malls (Tauber,
1972). Wakefield and Baker (1998) discovered that gathering information by exploring
new products or stores was a perceived benefit of the mall experience. They suggested
that exploration taps consumers desire for variety. For example, many people are
interested in learning about new trends in fashion, styles, or technology. While such
learning may take place with or without a purchase, certain shoppers for any product
category are more prone to buying new items. Stores that are first to carry new
products may appeal to these innovators. Having a variety of stores or mix of tenants
that work well together to meet the needs of many types of customers, including those
valuing exploration, will enhance the performance of the entire shopping mall
(Kaufman, 1996). Management must determine the combination of tenants that is
optimal for the targeted customer base, actively recruit them, and manage them as a Malaysian
cohesive unit. Thus, we have a fourth proposition:
shopping mall
P4. The greater a Malaysian consumers desire for exploration, the greater that behavior
consumers motivation to go to a shopping mall.
the buyers role in the process of haggling and bargaining, viewing it almost as a sport.
Additionally, recreational shoppers were found to visit malls more frequently than
those who shop strictly for utilitarian purposes (i.e. fulfilling responsibilities as wife,
mother, or father) (Wakefield and Baker, 1998). Thus, for many shoppers, going to a
mall allows them to fulfill (i.e. enact) a role that is significant to their personal identity.
Hence, we have:
P5. The greater the Malaysian consumers drive to enact a role, the greater that
consumers motivation to shop in a mall.
Social dimensions
Shopping can provide the opportunity for a social experience outside the home (e.g.
seeking new acquaintances or meeting those of the opposite sex). Shopping trips often
result in planned (or unplanned) encounters with friends. Thus, social variables
offering the benefit of affiliation with others also make malls attractive leisure sites.
Tauber (1972) and others (e.g. Wakefield and Baker, 1998) have suggested that an
important pleasing aspect of shopping includes the opportunity for social interaction
with friends, family, or even strangers that one encounters in a shopping location.
Moreover, consumers generally desire to trade where store personnel, particularly
salespeople, are perceived as helpful, friendly, and courteous (Loudon and Bitta 1993).
People will shop where they feel wanted and will even pay a little more for the privilege
(Underhill, 1999).
From a sociological perspective, malls have become community centers, offering
visitors common recreational attractions, e.g. music, movies, games, and dining out. A
mall visitor can meet with friends and then see a popular movie at the mall multiplex.
More commonly, malls act as gathering sites allowing people to meet and recreate with
friends, an activity particularly common among teens. The low cost of entry also
makes malls economical entertainment venues for families. This leads to our sixth
proposition:
P6. The greater a Malaysian consumers desire for social interaction, the greater
that consumers motivation to go to a shopping mall.
Convenience dimension
According to Kaufman (1996), many shoppers select shopping areas based on hours of
operation and travel time. Retail location theory also posits that consumers prefer to
shop as close to home as possible. Because many consumers spend relatively little time
at home, a definition of convenience that uses the home as the focal point may
be misleading. The existence of modern transportation and the availability of
APJML discretionary time serve to expose people to many shopping clusters while in transit to
19,4 their job, or social and recreational activities. Loudon and Bitta (1993) found that
consumers were very convenience-oriented, they disliked spending a lot of time finding
a parking space and trekking from one end of a mall to another. Convenience is also
important to anti-shoppers consumers who make fewer mall visits and fewer
purchases (Loudon and Bitta, 1993). Anti-shoppers perceive shopping as stressful and,
338 therefore, a task that is to be completed quickly. Anti-shoppers will prefer malls or
stores where they can get in and out quickly. Convenience of location and product
assortments offered will be key criteria for these consumers. Convenience is a key
selling point for shopping malls. According to Kaufman (1996), as shoppers sought
better ways to meet their needs retailers were advised to broaden their business
Downloaded by Tunku Abdul Rahman University College At 03:14 12 June 2017 (PT)
Methods
A survey approach was chosen in order to gain information directly from young adults
enrolled in Malaysian universities located in the Klang Valley of Malaysia. A survey
methodology permits the use of questions to measure constructs exclusively internal
to respondents, e.g. attitudes, opinions, intentions, etc., (Cooper and Schindler, 1998),
and the answers can be collected and combined to represent the answers of an entire
population (Reaves, 1992).
Figure 1.
The Klang Valley was selected because it has the highest concentration of institutions Malaysian
of higher learning in Malaysia. Four public universities and two private colleges were shopping mall
selected for inclusion in the survey. They were University Putra Malaysia, University
Kebangsaan Malaysia, University Malaya, University Technology MARA, College
behavior
Bandar Utama and Sunway College. These institutions were selected for two main
reasons. First, the location of these universities and colleges are in close proximity to
shopping malls. College Bandar Utama is close to One-Utama, University Malaya is 339
close to Mid-Valley Mega Mall, Sunway College is close to Sunway Pyramid Mall and
University Putra Malaysia is close to Mines Shopping Mall. Second, these institutions
were selected to represent the different ethnic groups prevalent in Malaysia. Public
Downloaded by Tunku Abdul Rahman University College At 03:14 12 June 2017 (PT)
universities across Malaysia are dominated by ethnic Malays, whereas, private colleges
are dominated by ethnic Chinese.
Measures
The survey instrument was a five-page self-administered questionnaire. Section I
of the questionnaire captured demographic data from respondents (e.g. age,
gender, education, etc.). Section II of the questionnaire measured the shopping
habits of respondents. These items addressed shopping frequency and average
time spent during a mall visit, as well as other shopping-related constructs. Both
sections, I and II variables used closed-ended multiple-choice format. Section III
contained measures of respondents shopping activities in a mall. The items in
this section (14, in all) were taken from Lui (1997). These questions were
intended to determine respondents engagement in and preferences for specific
activities when in a shopping mall, e.g. browsing/making an unplanned purchase,
movie watching, dining, socializing, etc. Respondents were asked to demonstrate
their preference for the activity (activities) that they just pursued in the
shopping mall. Section IV sought to measure the various dimensions of shopping
orientations described in our conceptual model. Twenty-seven items representing
the seven predictors of consumers motivations discussed above were used. Each
item utilized a five-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 strongly disagree to
5 strongly agree. Multiple item measures were used for all dimensions, ranging
from two to seven items per dimension. The items covered a variety of possible
shopping motivations and benefits the respondents might seek during their mall
visits, as adapted from Bloch et al. (1994) and Tauber (1972). The reliability
coefficient for the items on shopping orientation was 0.8377, highly acceptable for
a reliability test.
The completed instrument was pre-tested by 20 respondents in University Putra
Malaysia. Based on the feedback obtained from these respondents, the questionnaire
was subsequently refined and then developed in an English version.
Sample frame
Non-probability sampling by convenience was used. Thirty students, selected at
random, were interviewed at each of the five University/College locations. To provide
an adequate level of confidence in this study, a sample size of 150 respondents was
targeted.
APJML Data analysis
19,4 The data were examined using frequency analysis. Frequency analysis was used to
achieve the first two objectives of the study: (a) determining the shopping habits of the
students and (b) determining the activities that students engage in while inside a mall.
A mean score of 4.00 was used as a cut off for the consumer-orientation items. Items
achieving ratings of 4.00 or greater were deemed important and chosen to be cross-
340 tabulated with demographic variables. Shopping orientation items representing the
seven shopping orientation categories (i.e. aesthetics, escape, flow, exploration, role
enactment, social and convenience) chosen by most respondents as the principal reason
why they patronize a shopping mall were also cross-tabulated with demographic
variables.
Downloaded by Tunku Abdul Rahman University College At 03:14 12 June 2017 (PT)
The cross-tabulation analyses were used to assess the relationships (if any) between
demographic factors and the activities consumers engaged in while inside a mall, and
their shopping orientations. Some demographic variables were also cross-tabulated
with items relating to consumer activity items achieving a mean score of 4.00 or above.
A significance level of p 0.05 was used to determine the existence of a relationship
between the variables that were cross-tabulated. Results with p 0.05 were presumed
to reflect variables that were significantly related to one another.
Findings
A total of 132 usable responses were obtained from the survey fieldwork. Based on the
data collected, a demographic profile of the respondents was constructed, shown in
Table I.
The sample included 58.3 per cent female and 41.7 per cent male respondents. With
respect to age, the largest group of respondents fell in the 22-25 years age group,
accounting for 35.6 per cent of respondents. This was followed by the 26-30 years age
group (23.5 per cent), the 31 to 35 years age group (19.7 per cent), the above 36 years old
and above (12.1 per cent) and the 18-21 years age group (9.1 per cent). Malay
respondents accounted for 51.5 per cent of respondents, Chinese 33.3 per cent, and
Indian 12.9 per cent. In terms of marital status, the largest group fell into the single
category, 58.3 per cent of respondents. This was followed by married respondents, 38.6
per cent. Those who were separated/divorced or widowed constituted 3 per cent of
respondents.
The education level of respondents was, on the whole, quite high. The largest group
consisted of those, who are pursuing graduate programs, 30.3 per cent, and
undergraduate programs, 45.5 per cent; 2.3 per cent are currently pursuing their PhD.
The percentage of respondents pursuing Diploma and certificate level was
comparatively low, i.e. 14.4 per cent and 7.9 per cent, respectively.
Statistics on the major source of income of the respondents showed that a large
proportion of respondents (31.8 per cent) were sponsored by their parents. Self-
sponsored and scholarship/study loan constituted 29.5 per cent and 23.5 per cent,
respectively. Another 15.2 per cent of respondents were others a combination of any
of the above answers. Regarding the amount of income, 47.8 per cent of the respondents
indicated that they had a monthly personal income of RM1,500 and more, while 15.9
per cent reported figures between RM1,000 to RM1,499. Another 19.7 per cent of the
respondents said that they earned between RM501 and RM999 in monthly personal
income. The remaining 16.7 per cent earned RM500 and below.
Frequency Percentage Malaysian
shopping mall
1. Gender behavior
Male 55 41.7
Female 77 58.3
Total 132 100
2. Age 341
18-21 12 9.1
22-25 47 35.6
26-30 31 23.5
31-35 26 19.7
36 and above 16 12.1
Downloaded by Tunku Abdul Rahman University College At 03:14 12 June 2017 (PT)
Shopping behaviors
Respondents shopping behaviors are shown in Table II. The study found that students
in institutions of higher learning spent, on average, about two and a half hours in the
shopping mall during their mall visits. Othman and Lim (1997) reported that
Malaysian shoppers (inclusive of students and working people) spend an average
APJML Frequency Percentage
19,4
(1) Average time spent
30 min to 1 h 9 6.8
1.5 h to 2 h 40 30.3
2.5 h to 3 h 34 25.8
3.5 h to 4 h 20 15.2
342 4 h and above 29 22.0
Total 132 100.0
(2) Number of different stores visited
1-2 malls 11 8.3
3-4 malls 35 26.5
Downloaded by Tunku Abdul Rahman University College At 03:14 12 June 2017 (PT)
96 min and Bloch et al. (1994) found that American shoppers spent about 78 min in a
mall. This indicates that Malaysian students appear to spend significantly more time
in the mall compared to the Western subjects.
In terms of the number of different stores visited during a normal trip to the mall,
the study found that, on average, respondents visited about six stores per trip. By
comparison, American shoppers visited about five stores per trip (see Bloch et al.,
1994). This finding suggests that Malaysian students visit a comparable, albeit slightly
higher, number of stores in a typical visit compared to American consumers.
The study also examined the number of different shopping malls visited by
respondents in the previous 30 days. seventy-seven respondents (58.3 per cent) claimed
that they had visited one to two different shopping malls and 36 respondents (27.3 per
cent) reported that they had visited three to four malls in the past 30 days. 14
respondents (10.6 per cent) said they had visited more than four malls in the same
period. Thus, 37.9 per cent of respondents visited three or more different shopping Malaysian
malls in the previous 30 days.
With regards to the frequency of visiting shopping malls, Table II indicates that 41.7
shopping mall
per cent of respondents visited shopping malls at least once a week. A total of 25.8 per behavior
cent visited shopping malls once every two weeks and 23.5 per cent of respondents
visited the shopping malls once a month or less. Of note, 9.1 per cent reported they
visited a mall every day. These findings are similar to US data reported by Kowinski
(1985). Kowinski found that 75 per cent of American respondents visit shopping malls
343
at least once in a month.
Shopping malls were popular destinations for our sample. Seventy-five per cent of
the University and College students sampled visited shopping malls at least once every
Downloaded by Tunku Abdul Rahman University College At 03:14 12 June 2017 (PT)
two weeks. Visiting shopping malls has become a major recreational activity among
urban Malaysian consumers.
With respect to spending patterns, 30 per cent of respondents spent 6-10 per cent of
their monthly expenditures in shopping malls and 14.4 per cent spent 5 per cent or less
(see Table II). About 17 per cent of respondents spent between 11 per cent and 15 per
cent and the remaining 37.9 per cent spent more than 15 per cent of their monthly
expenditure in malls. These findings indicate that Malaysian students spent a
significant proportion of their monthly expenditures in shopping malls.
Shopping orientations
As discussed earlier, there are a variety of reasons (or factors) why consumers visit
shopping malls (i.e. aesthetic, escape, flow, etc.). The reported importance of various
dimensions of each factor was compared across the various age groups specified
within the sample using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Preliminary results
from our study are presented in Table III.
Overall, aesthetic and exploration dimensions received higher preference scores
compared to other dimensions. Conversely, escape and flow dimensions tended to
obtain lower preference scores compared to other dimensions. In general, respondents
did not visit shopping malls just to escape from boredom, loneliness, or stress; to avoid
bad weather; or as a diversion from their daily routine as a student. It appears study
respondents went to malls as proactive seekers of positive rewards, not to avoid or
forget negative circumstances.
The highest rated dimensions were:
. The interior design of the malls usually attracts my attentions (4.16).
. Certain stores are fun to visit because they sell products that interest me (4.01).
. Going to the mall is an enjoyable experience when I am with friends (4.01).
. Mall is a one-stop shopping (4.00).
Thus, Malaysian students were motivated to visit malls primarily by the interior
design of the mall; products that interest them; good alternatives for socializing with
friends; convenient one-stop shopping.
One of the objectives of our study was to examine differences between age cohort
groups with respect to shopping orientations. Theoretically, one would expect that
shoppers from different age groups would have different motivations for visiting
shopping mall. Five age groups were examined: 18-21, 22-25, 26-30, 31-35, 36 and
above. The one-way ANOVA tests (Table III) showed that out of the 27 shopping
orientation items, 11 varied significantly between age groups (p 0.05).
APJML 18-21 22-25 26-30 31-35 >36 Total p*
19,4
(a) Aesthetic
1. The interior design of the malls
usually attracts my attentions 4.33 4.34 3.94 4.15 3.94 4.16 0.081
2. I notice the color of the mall
interior 3.33 3.66 3.42 3.73 3.81 3.61 0.171
344 3. I notice the texture of the
mall interior 3.17 3.57 3.39 3.58 3.68 3.51 0.45
4. The environment (i.e. lighting
and decoration) in the malls
attracts my attentions 4.00 3.83 3.9 4.08 3.38 3.86 0.107
Downloaded by Tunku Abdul Rahman University College At 03:14 12 June 2017 (PT)
(b) Escape
6. When I am bored, the mall is
a good place to go 3.75 3.51 3.61 3.35 2.69 3.42 0.069
7. When I am alone and need
something to do, the mall is a
good place to go 3.17 3.11 3.13 3.04 2.56 3.04 0.634
8. When I am stressful, the mall
is a good place to go 3.17 3.36 3.16 2.85 2.31 3.07 0.027
9. I feel relax during my mall
visit 3.75 3.66 3.61 3.38 2.88 3.51 0.010
10. I visit the mall to avoid the
bad weather 3.42 3.06 3.19 3.08 2.31 3.04 0.035
11. I visit the mall to avoid
traffic congestion 3.67 3.40 2.94 2.85 2.38 3.08 0.003
12. I visit the mall as a diversion
from the daily routine life as a
student 3.67 3.60 3.52 3.04 2.25 3.31 0.000
(c) Flow
13. When I am in the mall, I
feel like I am in another world 3.17 2.91 2.97 2.69 2.50 2.86 0.281
14. I lose track of time, when I
am inside the mall 3.67 3.66 3.71 3.42 3.25 3.58 0.413
15. When I leave the mall, I am
sometimes surprised to find out it
is dark outside 2.92 3.28 3.77 3.5 3.19 3.39 0.064
(d) Exploration
16. Mall is a good place to find
out what is new 4.08 3.70 3.84 4.12 3.56 3.83 0.153
17. Certain stores are fun to
visit because they sell products
that interest me 3.75 4.09 4.00 4.04 3.94 4.01 0.514
18. I consider a visit to the mall
as a learning experience. 4.08 4.04 3.71 3.73 3.44 3.83 0.024
19. I enjoy handling the
merchandise and trying it on 4.00 3.98 3.32 3.27 3.06 3.58 0.000
Table III.
ANOVA scores of
shopping orientation by
age groups (Continued)
18-21 22-25 26-30 31-35 >36 Total p* Malaysian
shopping mall
(e) Role enactment behavior
20. I perceive myself as a wise
shopper by looking at price
bargain between stores in the mall 4.17 4.02 3.71 3.92 3.69 3.9 0.079
21. Grocery shopping is a
customary activity of the 345
housewife 2.92 2.62 3.68 3.11 3.19 3.06 0.001
(f) Social
22. Going to the mall is an
Downloaded by Tunku Abdul Rahman University College At 03:14 12 June 2017 (PT)
(g) Convenience
24. I visit the mall because of
its convenient location to my
house or study place 3.67 3.77 3.71 3.38 3.25 3.61 0.237
25. I visit the mall because it is
easier to find a parking space at
economy rate 2.58 2.55 3.48 3.54 2.94 3.02 0.000
26. The mall store hours are
convenient 3.50 3.34 3.81 3.62 3.38 3.52 0.252
27. Mall is a one-stop shopping
place 3.92 3.98 3.90 4.19 3.94 3.99 0.632
Notes: The figures in the table are mean scores based on a scale of 1-5, in which 1 Strongly
disagree and 5 Strongly agree. The higher the mean score, the more respondents agree to the
statement; *Level of significance using one-way ANOVA test. Significance values <0.05 are
highlighted and underscored Table III.
Five of the items that varied between age groups were from the escape dimension. The
results generally indicate that respondents from the younger age groups used
shopping mall visits for escapism more than the older respondents.
Similarly, respondents in the younger age groups indicated higher preferences for
discovering and examining products, two of the items in the exploration dimension.
Visiting the mall is an enjoyable experience when I am with friends, a social dimension
item, also varied significantly. Younger age group tended to agree with this statement more
than the older age groups. This result suggests that younger respondents are more likely to
see mall visits as opportunities to socialize with their friends.
elements of malls than older respondents. These data seem to add credence
to Underhills (2005) assessment that teenagers (i.e. younger consumers) are the
population most enamored with malls.
Marketing implications
With the growing number of modern shopping malls in the Klang Valley and the Asia-
Pacific region overall, it is obvious that competition in this industry is intense. Mall
management must be cognizant of the needs and wants of the targeted consumers to
build and maintain share. The results of our study have several implications that
should be of benefit to the retailing industry, and mall management, specifically.
Shopping malls have become social and recreational centers where people go for
multiple purposes: shopping, recreational pursuits, entertainment, meeting friends,
simply browsing around, and so on. Therefore, developers of malls must adapt to the fact
that malls have evolved into something more than simply a place for buying products.
Shopping malls, that could offer exciting stores with enticing product assortments,
multitudinous entertainment and experiential opportunities, combined with modern
and attractive designs and facilities will be necessary to attract more people.
Aesthetic factors were highly valued by Malaysian students. Statements related to
interior design of the malls, music, decorations, and lighting were found to have high
preference scores. As such, mall management should make sure that their mall
atmospherics offer a mall environment that is pleasing to multiple senses, to ensure it is
conducive for shoppers to stay and spend more of their time and money. Managing
atmospherics is a strategic task, affecting success in positioning and differentiation.
Exploration, social and convenience dimensions were also preferred by Malaysian
students. The students favored a wide assortment of products, one-stop shopping, and an
enjoyable place to socialize with friends. Mall management of the tenant and service mix
should be used as a strategic tool in attracting shoppers to contemporary Malaysian malls.
When comparing the differences of shopping orientations by age groups, a number
of differences were found. Younger Malaysian adults appeared to be more favorably
disposed towards malls than slightly older adults. Mall management must concurrently
execute strategies to maintain their attraction to younger consumers, perhaps by
including stores that are futuristic and offer the most advanced styles or technologies,
and appeal to somewhat older adults by offering the tenant, entertainment, and
experience mix they will prefer, as well.
Future research
The sampling frame for this research was limited to students in the Klang Valley
regions in the heart of Kuala Lumpur, Serdang, Bandar Utama, Damansara, and Bangi.
Study findings, although interesting, are clearly not generalizable to all populations of Malaysian
non-Western consumers or even all Malaysian consumers. Convenience sampling
methods were used in this research due to time and resource constraints. These non-
shopping mall
probabilistic sampling methods may have led to biases in selection of respondents, behavior
however. It is recommended that future research utilize random sampling methods to
ensure the generalizability of results.
Future research should also consider a broader demographic profile (not just
students) representing multiple geographical locations in Malaysia such as the 347
Northern and Southern regions as well as other countries in the Asia-pacific region
given that consumers shopping-related perceptions and expectations are likely to
differ across countries or cultures throughout the world. Future research covering
Downloaded by Tunku Abdul Rahman University College At 03:14 12 June 2017 (PT)
References
Assael, H. (1987), Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action, 3rd ed., Kent Publishing Company,
Boston, MA.
Bloch, P.H., Ridgway, N.M. and Dawson, S.A. (1994), The consumer mall as shopping habitat,
Journal of Retailing, pp. 23-42.
Boedeker, M. (1995), New-type and traditional shoppers: a comparison of two major consumer
groups, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 17-26.
Chetthamrongchai, P. and Davies, G. (2000), Segmenting the market for food shoppers using
attitudes to shopping and to time, British Food Journal, Vol. 102 No. 2, pp. 81-101.
Cooper, D.R. and Schindler, P.S. (1998), Business Research Methods, 6th ed., McGraw-Hill,
New York, NY.
Dholakia, R.R. (1999), Going shopping: key determinants of shopping behaviors and motivations,
International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 154-65.
East, R. (1997), Consumer Behavior: Advances and Applications in Marketing, 3rd ed., Prentice Hall,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Kaufman, C.F. (1996), A new look at one-stop shopping: a TIMES model approach to matching
store hours and shopper schedules, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 4-52.
Kowinski, W.S. (1985), The Malling of America, William Morrow & Co., New York, NY.
Lee, M. (1995), Going grey, Asia Magazine, 18-20 August, pp. 8-11.
Loudon, D.L. and Bitta, A.J.D. (1993), Consumer Behavior: Concepts and Applications, 4th ed.,
McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Lui K. F. (1997), Shopping behavior in Kuala Lumpur shopping malls, Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Othman, M.N. and Lim, S.H. (1997), Consumer behavior in shopping malls: a study of urban
Malaysian consumers, Malaysian Journal of Consumer & Family Economics, pp. 79-90.
Peter, J.P. and Olson, J.C. (1994), Understanding Consumer Behavior, Irwin Inc, Homewood, IL.
Reaves, C.C. (1992), Quantitative Research for the Behavioral Sciences, John Wiley and Sons Inc,
New York, NY.
Reid, R. and Brown, S. (1996), I hate shopping! an introspective perspective, International
Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp 4-16.
Solomon, M.R. (1994), Consumer Behavior, 2nd ed., Allyn Bacon
Underhill, P. (1999), Why We Buy? The Science of Shopping, Simon Schuster, New York, NY.
Underhill, P. (2005), Call of the Mall. Simon Schuster, New York, NY.
APJML Wakefield, K. L. and Baker, J. (1998), Excitement at the mall: determinants and effects on
shopping, Journal of Retailing, Fall, pp. 515-50.
19,4
Further reading
Assael, H. (1995), Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action, 5th ed., South Western College
Publishing, Cincinnati, OH.
Baker, T.L. (1988), Doing Social Research, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
348
Bloch, P.H., Ridgway, N.M. and Nelson, J.E. (1991), Leisure and the Shopping Mall, in Holman,
R. and Solomon, M. (Eds), Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 18, Association of
Consumer Research: Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 445-51.
Chong, L. (1996), Department stores in troubled waters: a singapore encounter, International
Downloaded by Tunku Abdul Rahman University College At 03:14 12 June 2017 (PT)
1. Jun-Jie Hew, Mohd Nizam Bin A. Badaruddin, M. Krishna Moorthy. 2017. Crafting a smartphone
repurchase decision making process: Do brand attachment and gender matter?. Telematics and Informatics
34:4, 34-56. [CrossRef]
2. PaulJustin Justin Paul profjust@gmail.com Justin Paul is Professor at the University of Puerto Rico, San
Juan, Puerto Rico. He is a Full Professor with the University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR, USA. He
has served as a faculty member with the University of Washington and Nagoya University of Commerce
& Business (Japan), prior to his position with the University of Puerto Rico, USA. He is on the editorial
board of Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of East-West Business, Review of International
Business & Strategy and Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services and a regular reviewer for Journal
of World Business, Journal of Services Marketing, etc. He served as Department Chairperson at Indian
Downloaded by Tunku Abdul Rahman University College At 03:14 12 June 2017 (PT)
Institute of Management (IIM) and has taught full courses at Vienna University of Economics & Business,
Aarhus University (Denmark), Grenoble Eco le de Management-France, Universite De Versailles (France),
ISM University(Lithuania), SP Jain (Dubai) and Warsaw School of Economics (Poland). He has also
published over 40 research papers in reputed journals and four case studies with Ivey & Harvard. He is
known as an author/co-author of text books titled Business Environment, Services Marketing, International
Marketing, International Business (sixth edition) and Export-Import Management (second edition) by
McGraw-Hill, Pearson and Oxford University Press, respectively (published from India). University of
Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico . 2017. What determine shoppers preferences for malls in an emerging
market?. Young Consumers 18:1, 70-83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
3. Abdullah A. Aldousari, Farzana Yasmin, Mohd Shukri Ab Yajid, Zafar U. Ahmed. 2017. Consumer
evaluations of store brands: Effects of product-perceived risks. Journal of Transnational Management 22:2,
71-90. [CrossRef]
4. Yuanyi Chen, Minyi Guo, Jiaxing Shen, Jiannong Cao. 2017. GraphLoc: a graph-based method for indoor
subarea localization with zero-configuration. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing . [CrossRef]
5. Junyi Zhang, Masashi Kuwano, Makoto Chikaraishi, Hajime Seya 97. [CrossRef]
6. Sangeeta Peter, Victor Anandkumar. 2016. Deconstructing the shopping experience of tourists to the
Dubai Shopping Festival. Cogent Business & Management 3:1. . [CrossRef]
7. Justin Paul, Koloth G. Sankaranarayanan, Nandakumar Mekoth. 2016. Consumer satisfaction in retail
stores: theory and implications. International Journal of Consumer Studies 40:6, 635-642. [CrossRef]
8. TandonAnushree Anushree Tandon GuptaAshish Ashish Gupta TripathiVibhuti Vibhuti Tripathi
Department of Business Management, Amity University, Noida, India Department of Business
Management, Dr. Hari Singh Gour University, Sagar, India School of Management Studies, Motilal Nehru
National Institute of Technology, Allahabad, India . 2016. Managing shopping experience through mall
attractiveness dimensions. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 28:4, 634-649. [Abstract] [Full
Text] [PDF]
9. CanGlin Feryal Glin Feryal Can Glin Feryal Can is Assistant Professor at the Department of
Industrial Engineering, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey. KurtulmusogluFeride Bahar Feride Bahar
Kurtulmusoglu Feride Bahar Kurtulmusoglu is Associate Professor at the Department of Business
Administration, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey. AtalayKumru Didem Kumru Didem Atalay Kumru
Didem Atalay is Associate Professor at the Department of Industrial Engineering, Baskent University,
Ankara, Turkey. Department of Industrial Engineering, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey Department
of Business Administration, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey Department of Industrial Engineering,
Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey . 2016. A case study on shopping malls attributes for young consumers.
Young Consumers 17:3, 274-292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
10. Sertan Kabadayi, Banu Paksoy. 2016. A segmentation of Turkish consumers based on their motives to visit
shopping centres. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 26:4, 456-476.
[CrossRef]
11. Mohammed Ismail El-Adly Department of Marketing, Abu Dhabi University, Al Ain, United Arab
Emirates Riyad Eid Department of Marketing, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab
Emirates AND Department of Marketing, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt . 2015. Measuring the perceived
value of malls in a non-Western context: the case of the UAE. International Journal of Retail & Distribution
Management 43:9, 849-869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
12. Teck-Hong Tan. 2015. Assessing the significance of environmentally friendly mall from Malaysian mall
visitors perspective. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal 21:3, 275-290. [CrossRef]
Downloaded by Tunku Abdul Rahman University College At 03:14 12 June 2017 (PT)
13. Julian C.H. Lee. 2014. Jom Bersih! Global Bersih and the enactment of Malaysian citizenship in
Melbourne. Citizenship Studies 18:8, 900-913. [CrossRef]
14. Kok Wei Khong Taylor's Business School, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia Fon Sim Ong
Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Selangor,
Malaysia . 2014. Shopper perception and loyalty: a stochastic approach to modelling shopping mall
behaviour. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 42:7, 626-642. [Abstract] [Full Text]
[PDF]
15. Syuhaily Osman Faculty of Human Ecology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia Fon Sim Ong
Nottingham University Business School, The University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Malaysia Md
Nor Othman Faculty of Business and Accountancy, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Kok
Wei Khong Taylors Business School, Taylors University, Malaysia . 2014. The mediating effect of mood
on in-store behaviour among Muslim shoppers. Journal of Islamic Marketing 5:2, 178-197. [Abstract] [Full
Text] [PDF]
16. Arpita Khare Indian Institute of Management Rohtak, Rohtak, India Dhiren Achtani Indian Institute of
Management Rohtak, Rohtak, India Manish Khattar Indian Institute of Management Rohtak, Rohtak,
India . 2014. Influence of price perception and shopping motives on Indian consumers' attitude towards
retailer promotions in malls. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 26:2, 272-295. [Abstract] [Full
Text] [PDF]
17. Alison Elizabeth Lloyd Department of Management and Marketing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic
University, Kowloon, Hong Kong Ricky Y.K. Chan Department of Management and Marketing, The
Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong Leslie S.C. Yip School of Profession Education
and Executive Development, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong Andrew Chan
School of Hotel and Tourism Management, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong
Kong . 2014. Time buying and time saving: effects on service convenience and the shopping experience at
the mall. Journal of Services Marketing 28:1, 36-49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
18. . 2014. A Literature Review on the Research about Consumer Behavior in Shopping Mall. Modern
Marketing 04:01, 22-28. [CrossRef]
19. Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani, Mohammad Hasan Aghdaie, Arman Derakhti, Edmundas Kazimieras
Zavadskas, Mohammad Hossein Morshed Varzandeh. 2013. Decision making on business issues with
foresight perspective; an application of new hybrid MCDM model in shopping mall locating. Expert Systems
with Applications 40:17, 7111-7121. [CrossRef]
20. Hasliza HassanFaculty of Management, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, Malaysia Abu Bakar SadeGlobal
Entrepreneurship Research and Innovation Centre, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia Muhammad Sabbir RahmanGraduate School of Management, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya,
Malaysia. 2013. Malaysian hypermarket retailing development and expansion. International Journal of Retail
& Distribution Management 41:8, 584-595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
21. Professor T.C. Melewar and Dr Sharifah AlwiJeannot Abdul KarimTaylor's University, Lakeside Campus,
Subang Jaya, Malaysia Mukesh KumarCENTRUM Catlica, Graduate School of Business, Pontificia
Universidad Catlica del Per, Lima, Per Sofiah Abd RahmanUniversiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam,
Malaysia. 2013. Measuring shopping values of Malaysian retail consumers. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing
and Logistics 25:2, 200-224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
22. Mohd Zaki Arif, NorAini Yusof, Shardy Abdullah. 2012. Exploring Malaysian Mall Manager's KSAOs.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 62, 144-158. [CrossRef]
Downloaded by Tunku Abdul Rahman University College At 03:14 12 June 2017 (PT)
23. Arpita Khare. 2012. Influence of mall attributes and demographics on Indian consumers mall involvement
behavior: An exploratory study. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing 20:3-4,
192-202. [CrossRef]
24. Fon Sim Ong, Kok Wei Khong, Tengku M. Faziharudean, Xin Dai. 2012. Path analysis of atmospherics
and convenience on flow: the mediation effects of brand affect and brand trust. The International Review
of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 22:3, 277-291. [CrossRef]
25. Yue-Teng Wong, Syuhaily Osman, Askiah Jamaluddin, Benjamin Chan Yin-Fah. 2012. Shopping motives,
store attributes and shopping enjoyment among Malaysian youth. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
19:2, 240-248. [CrossRef]
26. Jamaliah Mohd. Yusof, Rosidah Musa, Sofiah Abd. Rahman. 2012. The Effects of Green Image of Retailers
on Shopping Value and Store Loyalty. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 50, 710-721. [CrossRef]
27. Kiran Karande, Altaf Merchant. 2012. The Impact of Time and Planning Orientation on an Individual's
Recreational Shopper Identity and Shopping Behavior. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 20:1,
59-72. [CrossRef]
28. Jamaliah Mohd. Yusof, Sofiah Abd. Rahman, Rosidah MusaExamining the effects of shopping orientation
and corporate social responsibility on store loyalty 83-88. [CrossRef]
29. Arpita Khare. 2011. Influence of hedonic and utilitarian values in determining attitude towards malls: A
case of Indian small city consumers. Journal of Retail & Leisure Property 9:5, 429-442. [CrossRef]
30. Arpita Khare. 2011. Mall shopping behaviour of Indian small town consumers. Journal of Retailing and
Consumer Services 18:1, 110-118. [CrossRef]
31. Aldukali Salem I. Almselati, Riza Atiq O.K. Rahmat, Othman Jaafar. 2011. An Overview of Urban
Transport in Malaysia. The Social Sciences 6:1, 24-33. [CrossRef]
32. Tulin Vural ArslanBased at the Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture,
Uludag University, BursaTurkey Filiz Senkal SezerBased at the Department of Architecture, Faculty of
Engineering and Architecture, Uludag University, BursaTurkey Erkan IsigicokBased at the Department
of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Uludag University, BursaTurkey. 2010.
Magnetism of shopping malls on young Turkish consumers. Young Consumers 11:3, 178-188. [Abstract]
[Full Text] [PDF]
33. Jean-Charles Chebat, M. Joseph Sirgy, Stephan Grzeskowiak. 2010. How can shopping mall management
best capture mall image?. Journal of Business Research 63:7, 735-740. [CrossRef]