Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
A P A
T h e E n g i n e e r e d Wo o d A s s o c i a t i o n
DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION GUIDE
NOISE-RATED
SYSTEMS
GDE,W460,NR.0 8/28/00 2:03 PM Page 2
A P A
2000 APA THE ENGINEERED WOOD ASSOCIATION ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ANY COPYING, MODIFICATION, DISTRIBUTION OR OTHER USE OF THIS PUBLICATION OTHER THAN AS EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED BY APA IS PROHIBITED BY THE U.S. COPYRIGHT LAWS.
T h e E n g i n e e r e d Wo o d A s s o c i a t i o n
two billion trees every year. In addition, millions of trees seed naturally. The forest
products industry, which comprises about 15 percent of forestland ownership, is
responsible for 41 percent of replanted forest acreage. That works out to more than one
billion trees a year, or about three million trees planted every day. This high rate of
replanting accounts for the fact that each year, 27 percent more timber is grown
than is harvested.
Manufacturing wood is energy
Percent of Percent of
efficient. Wood products made up Material Production Energy Use
47 percent of all industrial raw materials
Wood 47 4
manufactured in the United States, yet
Steel 23 48
consumed only 4 percent of the energy
needed to manufacture all industrial raw Aluminum 2 8
materials, according to a 1987 study.
Good news for a healthy planet. For every ton of wood grown, a young forest
produces 1.07 tons of oxygen and absorbs 1.47 tons of carbon dioxide.
Wood. Its the right product for the environment.
NOTICE:
The recommendations in
A PA
this guide apply only to
panels that bear the APA
RED
GINEE TION trademark. Only panels
THE ENA SSOCIA
WO O D bearing the APA trademark
ING are subject to the
SHEATH CH
RATED 15/3 IN
2 Associations quality
32/1D6FOR SPACING auditing program.
SIZE RE 1
EXPOSU
000 PRP-10
8
C-D
PS 1-95
GDE,W460,NR.0 8/28/00 2:03 PM Page 3
CONTENTS
Walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
4
2000 APA - The Engineered Wood Association
GDE,W460,NR.0 8/28/00 2:03 PM Page 5
42 sion. Improper installation, on the other Note: While the listed assemblies
Loud speech audible as hand, can destroy the sound-insulating were tested using plywood, it is
a murmur.
values of the best designs. believed that other wood structural
panels (oriented strand board [OSB]
45 Advantages of Wood
and COM-PLY ) may be substituted
Must strain to hear loud speech. Structural Panels
on a thickness for thickness basis.
Use of light-frame construction systems
48 challenges designers to insulate against
Because of their substantially similar
Some loud speech barely strength and stiffness properties and
audible. noise rather than simply relying on the
slightly higher density, use of these
massiveness of heavy walls and floors.
other wood structural panel products
50 Excellent levels of noise control can be
in lieu of plywood should not com-
Loud speech not audible achieved with good acoustical design in
promise the STC or IIC of the
wood-frame structures surfaced with
tested systems.
wood structural panels. Sound control
The best way to reduce impact noise is can be achieved by applying floor and The sound transmission and impact
to cover a floor with a resilient surfacing wall materials over isolated air spaces ratings shown for these constructions
material such as carpet and padding. that absorb sound. The addition of are well within the range of acceptable
Where a hard surface finish flooring is resilient channels also greatly reduces ratings for multifamily residential and
used, a resiliently mounted ceiling sys- sound transmission. Acoustically rated nonresidential buildings. They should
tem is effective, as is insulation board constructions of the type shown in this apply to actual construction provided
sandwiched between the subfloor and brochure are suggested since simple that recognized precautions are taken
the underlayment. design procedures are not available. for preventing flanking noise and sound
leaks, and provided the construction
Wood structural panels are excellent for
Flanking Paths actually conforms to the assembly
this type of construction. Large panel
Acoustical ratings do not reflect the which has been tested.
size reduces the number of joints and
effect of noise which bypasses, or
cracks that can leak airborne noise. However, quality of workmanship, material
flanks the specific construction.
Wood structural panels are also an and conditions at the site may vary widely.
Flanking can increase noise transmis-
exceptionally good base for resilient Because APA The Engineered Wood
sion significantly. For example, a heating
coverings that cut impact noise. They Association has no control over these
duct in a partition normally having an
are available, versatile and easy to adjust elements, it cannot warrant or assume
STC of 48 could reduce the STC for
when necessary to compensate for responsibility for performance
the combination to around 30, if it
building imperfections. A number of to rated levels.
were not properly isolated.
typical assemblies are shown in the
following pages.
5
2000 APA - The Engineered Wood Association
GDE,W460,NR.0 8/28/00 2:03 PM Page 6
6
2000 APA - The Engineered Wood Association
GDE,W460,NR.0 8/28/00 2:03 PM Page 7
FIGURE 1 (CONTINUED)
assemblies to conform to requirements APA APA The Engineered Wood Association, Tacoma, Washington
for a one-hour fire-resistance rating. (See
USDA USDA Forest Service, Wood Construction Research, Seattle, Washington
Underwriters Laboratories Fire
Resistance Directory.) Within certain ISU Iowa State University, and USDA Forest Service, Division of Forest Economics and
Marketing Research, Washington, D.C.
limits, such modifications should have
a minimum effect on the acoustical NBS National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C. (Now National Institute of
ratings shown. In any event, the govern- Standards and Technology NIST)
ing code should be consulted with USG United States Gypsum Company, Chicago, Illinois
respect to fire resistance requirements.
W Weyerhaeuser Company, Dierks Division, Hot Springs, Arkansas
Walls and partitions having wood struc-
tural panels nailed directly to the fram- WWPA Western Wood Products Association, Portland, Oregon
ing will develop excellent racking
GC Gyp-Crete Corporation* Hamel, Minnesota *(Now Maxxon Corp.)
resistance, which is often important in
apartment and office designs requiring NRCC National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
shear walls.
CCA Cellular Concrete Association (Inactive)
7
2000 APA - The Engineered Wood Association
GDE,W460,NR.0 8/28/00 2:03 PM Page 8
TABLE 1
CASE 5 ILLUSTRATED
8
2000 APA - The Engineered Wood Association
GDE,W460,NR.0 8/28/00 2:03 PM Page 9
TABLE 2
CASE 4 ILLUSTRATED
Resilient channels
spaced 24" o.c.
5/8" gypsum wallboard
screwed to resilient
channels; joints taped
9
2000 APA - The Engineered Wood Association
GDE,W460,NR.0 8/28/00 2:03 PM Page 10
TABLE 3
10
2000 APA - The Engineered Wood Association
GDE,W460,NR.0 8/28/00 2:03 PM Page 11
TABLE 3 (Continued)
CASE 9 ILLUSTRATED
11
2000 APA - The Engineered Wood Association
GDE,W460,NR.0 8/28/00 2:03 PM Page 12
TABLE 3 (Continued)
12
2000 APA - The Engineered Wood Association
GDE,W460,NR.0 8/28/00 2:03 PM Page 13
TABLE 4
CASE 1 ILLUSTRATED
STC 51 IIC 80
Wood joists @ 16" o.c.
2x4 ceiling joists @ 16" o.c.
staggered 8" from floor joists
3" glass fiber insulation
13
2000 APA - The Engineered Wood Association
GDE,W460,NR.0 8/28/00 2:03 PM Page 14
TABLE 5
CASE 2 ILLUSTRATED
14
2000 APA - The Engineered Wood Association
GDE,W460,NR.0 8/28/00 2:03 PM Page 15
TABLE 6
CASE 2 ILLUSTRATED
15
2000 APA - The Engineered Wood Association
GDE,W460,NR.0 8/28/00 2:03 PM Page 16
FIELD TESTS Values were even closer for floors. The serious oversights in construction con-
paper goes on to state that The average tribute to sound leaks or flanking. It is,
Field tests prove laboratory sound rat- of the FSTCs** determined for 15 of course, still true that these ratings are
ings can be achieved in practice. Table 7 field-tested floor-ceiling assemblies was not achieved without determined effort
on the following page shows results of only one point lower than the average of at every stage in the design and
field tests made by the U.S.D.A. Forest the STCs based on laboratory tests of construction process.
Service.* A number of tests performed eight related assemblies. The entries near the bottom of the table
in apartment buildings in the Seattle Comparisonsbetween impact should be of particular interest for
area have shown that in general, field sound insulation measured in the labo- manufactured housing. They illustrate
STC values can indeed closely approach ratory and in the field are more limited the actual field test values for sound
laboratory values if all personnel than those of airborne sound insulation, insulation in a modular motel. Plywood
involved are careful in installation. The but indicate that laboratory and field sheathing was used in both floor-ceiling
following are excerpts from a paper by J. impact noise ratings are of the same and wall construction, primarily because
B. Grantham and T. B. Heebink, entitled general magnitude. of its excellent resistance to racking
Field/Laboratory STC Ratings of Wood- during transportation and erection. In
These findings refute the common
Framed Partitions, printed in Sound tests of comparative constructions, the
belief that actual field construction
and Vibration for October, 1971. wall with plywood sheathing produced
cannot approximate the behavior of the
For the 16 field tests that could be laboratory-tested samples. Actually, acoustic isolation just slightly better
compared with laboratory tests of com- Mr. Grantham states in his paper, The than an otherwise identical construction
parable wall constructions, the average comparison of field-measured insulation using fiberboard sheathing.
difference between predicted and actual of 21 walls and 15 floors with laboratory
performance was 3-1/2 points. With tests of similar wall and floor construc-
two cases of flanking and one of leaking tions reveals that the sound insulation *Wood Construction Research, Pacific
corrected, the average difference Northwest Forest Range Experiment Station,
predicted by laboratory tests can be Seattle, Washington
was 2-1/2 points. closely approximated in the field unless
**Field Sound Transmission Class.
16
2000 APA - The Engineered Wood Association
GDE,W460,NR.0 8/28/00 2:03 PM Page 17
TABLE 7
17
2000 APA - The Engineered Wood Association
GDE,W460,NR.0 8/28/00 2:03 PM Page 18
SHORT FORM
TYPICAL APA REGISTERED TRADEMARKS
SPECIFICATION
18
2000 APA - The Engineered Wood Association
GDE,W460,NR.0 8/28/00 2:04 PM Page 19
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
19
2000 APA - The Engineered Wood Association
GDE,W460,NR.0 8/30/00 9:52 AM Page 20
NOISE-RATED SYSTEMS
DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION GUIDE
WESTERN REGION
7011 So. 19th St. P.O. Box 11700
Tacoma, Washington 98411-0700
(253) 565-6600 Fax: (253) 565-7265
EASTERN REGION
2130 Barrett Park Drive, Suite 102
Kennesaw, Georgia 30144-3681
(770) 427-9371 Fax: (770) 423-1703
U.S. HEADQUARTERS
AND INTERNATIONAL
MARKETING DIVISION
7011 So. 19th St. P.O. Box 11700
Tacoma, Washington 98411-0700
(253) 565-6600 Fax: (253) 565-7265
Addres
eb s
W
@
:
www.apawood.org
A P A
T h e E n g i n e e r e d Wo o d A s s o c i a t i o n