Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Chintan Shah
1
Maritime Singapore
Singapores ports
GDP *2015 figures
5th Over130
45.2 million* largest ship registry in the world international shipping groups in
tonnes of bunker fuel sales Singapore
*2015 figures
2
Source : MPA
The Singapore Maritime Cluster
Port
activities
Class
Bunkering Ship Societies
Agency
Ship Ship
logistics Mgmt
Ship
R&D /
Training Design
owning/ Shipping
operation
Education Finance
Treasury/
HR/ Legal
Finance
IT/ Admin
Maritime
Marine
Legal &
insurance
Arbtn
Ship
Broking 3
Source : MPA
Transfer pricing Why it matters to Singapore
Shipping Companies
Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) while granting Maritime Sector Incentive, specifically
requires the company to prepare transfer pricing documentation as part of its terms and conditions:
MPA while granting Maritime Sector incentive adopts the arms length principle as part of its terms and
conditions while transacting with the related parties :
To the best of our knowledge, IRAS has set up new transfer pricing team who exclusively reviews the related
party transactions.
4
Introduction to Transfer Pricing
5
Why Transfer Pricing ?
6
What is Transfer Pricing ?
Transfer Arms
Price length price
8
Transfer pricing example
Cross border tax situations involve issues related to jurisdiction, allocation of income and valuation.
A MNE Group may exploit the opportunity to shrink the overall tax burden of the group through either under-charging or
over-charging the associated entity for intra-group trade:
Loss
A group may transfer the tax loss of an associated enterprise in a jurisdiction where losses cannot be carried forward
beyond the prescribed time limit to a jurisdiction without such restrictions so as to fully utilize the same.
In some cases loss may be transferred to take the benefit of deductions as quickly as possible.
Reduction of taxation not the only factor contributing to the transfer pricing policies and practices of a MNE Group.
Transfer pricing rules are essential for countries (for Tax administration and Tax
Payers) in order to
- Protect their tax base;
- Eliminate double taxation; and
- Enhance cross border trade
11
What do you think of this situation?
Multinational
Country A Country B
Assets
Functions
Risks
Profits $$ $$$$$$$$$$
Transfer pricing regulations assumes expected returns are positively and casually
related to functions performed, assets owned and risks assumed by a given entity.
More functions higher expected return
More complex functions higher expected return
More assets owned higher expected return
Intangible assets owned higher expected return
More risks assumed higher expected return
13
Global Tax Revolution
Global Tax Revolution
This new global tax environment has resulted in the following actions a Global Tax
Revolution:
Change in tax Changing
authorities behaviours of
approach
OECDs BEPSto OECDs BEPS
tax authorities
interpretation
project project
re tax treaties
of tax law and and tax laws
tax treaties
14
The OECD BEPS initiative
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) transfer pricing
guidelines, is widely acknowledged by tax authorities around the globe to determine transfer
pricing.
15
BEPS objectives : a new global tax environment
16
Singapore Joins Inclusive Framework as BEPS
Associate for implementing measures against BEPS
Singapore government is on record that it supports the BEPS project and it is clear that
BEPS-related considerations are high on its agenda.
17
Singapore Joins Inclusive Framework as BEPS
Associate for implementing measures against BEPS
Source : Events/Newsroom/Media-Releases-and-Speeches/Media-Releases/2016/Singapore-Joins-Inclusive-Framework-for-Implementing-Measures-against-Base-Erosion-and-Profit-Shifting--BEPS-/
18
Singapore Joins Inclusive Framework as BEPS
Associate for implementing measures against BEPS
3. Transfer pricing documentation. Singapore adheres to the internationally agreed arms length principle[5]. We will
commit to implement CbCR for financial years beginning on or after 1 Jan 2017 for multinational enterprises whose
ultimate parent entities are in Singapore and whose group turnover exceed S$1,125 million[6]. These enterprises are required to
file the Country-by-Country (CbC) reports with the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) within 12 months from the
last day of their financial year[7]. IRAS will exchange CbC reports with jurisdictions that Singapore has entered into bilateral
agreements with for automatic exchange of CbCR information, having established that they meet the following conditions:
-First, these jurisdictions have a strong rule of law and can ensure the confidentiality of the information exchanged and prevent its
unauthorised use.
-Second, there must be reciprocity in terms of the information exchanged.
IRAS will consult Singapore-headquartered multinational enterprises further on the implementation details of CbCR, and release these
details by September 2016.
4. Enhancing dispute resolution. IRAS has been active in engaging foreign tax authorities to resolve cross-border tax disputes
via the mutual agreement procedure provided in our bilateral tax treaties[8]. As a BEPS Associate, Singapore will work closely
with other jurisdictions to monitor the implementation of minimum standards on dispute resolution developed under the BEPS
Project. This will complement the other BEPS minimum standards and ensure that taxpayers have access to effective and
expedient dispute resolution mechanisms under bilateral tax treaties.
Source : Events/Newsroom/Media-Releases-and-Speeches/Media-Releases/2016/Singapore-Joins-Inclusive-Framework-for-Implementing-Measures-against-Base-Erosion-and-Profit-Shifting--BEPS-/
19
Transfer Pricing in Singapore
The most striking change is the explicit requirement for Singapore taxpayers to prepare
contemporaneous transfer pricing documentation to support the pricing of transactions
with related parties
If transfer pricing documentation is not prepared then this may attract transfer pricing
adjustments and penalties under the law
In addition, IRAS may not be as supportive of the transfer pricing positions of the taxpayer when
it comes to voluntary adjustments or negotiations with other tax authorities to eliminate or
mitigate double taxation (Mutual Agreement Procedure and Advanced Pricing Agreements)
21
BEPS Action 13 TP documentation & CbC reporting
Master file
Broad information about the MNCs business, transfer pricing
policies and agreements with tax authorities in a single
document available to all tax authorities where the MNC has
operations. CbCR
Broad information about the jurisdictional allocation of profits,
revenues, employees and assets.
Local file
Detailed information about the local business including related
party payments and receipts for products, services, royalties,
interest etc.
The IRAS transfer pricing guidelines updated in January 2015 The IRAS issued guidelines on CbC reporting for Singapore
are broadly in line with Action 13 Master file and local file MNEs on 10 October 2016 that generally are aligned with
approach. Action 13.
22
What is Transfer Pricing Documentation?
Transfer pricing documentation records kept by taxpayers to show that efforts have been made
to ensure that their related party transactions are concluded at arms length.
Transactions between local related party and income from transactions taxed at same rate
1
2 Loan transactions between local related parties, if lender is not in the business of borrowing and lending
3 Where a company applies the indicative margin for related party loans with certain conditions
4 Provision of prescribed routine services covered by the safe harbour cost +5%
6 Value of other types of related party transactions does not exceed specified thresholds (see table below)
24
Instances where transfer pricing documentation
is not required
Category of related party transactions Threshold (S$) per financial year
Purchase of goods from all related parties 15m
Sale of goods from all related parties 15m
Loans owed to all related parties 15m
Loans owed by all related parties 15m
All other categories of related party transactions. Examples:
Service income
Service payment
Royalty income
Royalty expense
Rental income 1m per category of transactions
Rental expense
Guarantee income
Guarantee payment
For the purpose of determining if the threshold is met, aggregation should be done
for each category of related party transactions. For example, all service income
received from related parties is to be aggregated. 25
Transfer pricing Why has Singapore become
Vigilant?
Assure OECD and the world, Singapore is not tax haven. (Refer to Oxfam report)
Share information with other tax jurisdictions information exchange and transparency
-Implementation of CbC reporting, new RPT reporting form, implementation of Common
Reporting Standards, General Anti-Avoidance provisions.
26
Common Audit Triggers for Transfer Pricing
Regional functions with no charge outs Possible sources of information for the IRAS
Huge variation in tax payable in ECI filing vs final tax payable in tax computation Tax computations
27
Transfer pricing controversy in Singapore
Trends and observations
Taxpayers with transfer pricing documentation and appropriate processes in place are always
in a better position to respond to the IRAS queries.
28
What does this mean for taxpayers?
Never prepared any formal Assess your documentation needs (Global HQ/Regional HQ/Singapore
TP documentation subsidiary)
Analyse gaps in TP documentation and polices
Identify sources of information (e.g. HQ)
Start preparing TP documentation and consider putting in place formal
TP Policy
Prepared TP Refresh analyses e.g. functional analysis, benchmarking studies
documentation years ago
Update with more information (e.g. value chain, supply chain) and prepare
other pieces of documents (e.g. TP policy, intercompany agreement) in line
with new Requirements
Prepared TP Evaluate gaps in information based on new requirements
documentation for latest
Prepare and maintain information that is not in the existing
financial year recently
documentation (e.g. value chain, supply chain) separately or consider
updating the documentation
29
Case Study Transfer pricing planning strategy
Parental
Loan 3. UK entity will then be involved in trading of bunkers
guarantee
$20m in the European market.
4. The acquisition of the UK entity was funded by a
combination of bank loans from third party banks in
the UK and subject to parental guarantee provided
to the banks by the Singapore parent company and
subordinated loans direct from the parent to the UK
Loan related entity.
$100m
Investment 5. The issue was to price the related party transactions
company in a way to reduce the overall effective tax rate.
Purchase
$200m
Bunkers 30
Case Study Transfer pricing planning strategy
Parental
Loan Example of benefits:
guarantee Arms length payments
$20m
1. Guarantee fee 1. Introduce arms length guarantee fee to Singapore of
2. Interest rate on loan 150 bps in respect of external funding of $100m:
3. Fee for services provided annual reduction in overall tax burden of $195,000
($ 100m*1.5%*13%).
2. Structure terms of intra-group loan of $20m from
Loan Singapore entity to UK entity at an arms length
$100m interest rate of 1%: annual reduction in overall tax
Investment burden of $26,000 ($20m*1%*13%).
company
3. Introduce fee for support services provided by
Singapore on cost plus mark-up basis, amounting to
Purchase e.g. $100,000 per year: annual reduction in overall
$200m
tax burden of $ 13000 ($100000*13%).
Bunkers 31
Closing remarks
It has been 11 years since the IRAS first issued its transfer pricing guidelines and 7 years since
the arms length principle was legislated there is a clear expectation that taxpayers should now
be more informed about transfer pricing requirements.
Aligning transfer pricing model in line with business and commercial reality, deployed and
implemented in accordance with the arms length principle.
Precaution is better than cure! - A company that undertakes pro-active transfer pricing planning
and diligently prepares and maintains adequate and timely transfer pricing documentation
stands the best chance of satisfying IRAS that it has complied with the arms length principle.
Being pro-active is paramount!
32
Annexures
33
Unprecedented focus on the morality of
multinationals tax affair.
Apple is being scrutinised by European officials, who accuse the company of using subsidiaries in Ireland to avoid paying
taxes on revenue generated abroad. While apple generates about 60 percent of its sales outside the U.S., its foreign tax rate
is 1.8 percent, according to Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Matt Larson
Amount in US $ millions 34
Singapore fifth worst tax haven in the world: Oxfam
Months after committing to a global initiative to curb tax avoidance, Singapore has again come under the spotlight for its
regime that allows companies to legally but artificially shift profits across borders to keep overall corporate taxes low.
A new report, titled Tax Battles: the dangerous global race to the bottom on corporate tax, was released on Monday (Dec
12) by United Kingdom-based charity organisation Oxfam, which examined the extent to which countries encourage
corporate tax avoidance. Oxfam named Singapore the fifth worst corporate tax haven for its lack of withholding taxes, its
range of tax incentives, and evidence of substantial profit shifting.
The Ministry of Finance (MOF) defended Singapores tax regime and said parts of the Oxfam report were inaccurate. We
note that the report cites the lack of withholding taxes as one of the characteristics of our regime. This is inaccurate.
Withholding tax (for example, interest, royalty, services, etc.) is applicable for payments made to non-resident persons.
Singapore does not impose withholding tax on dividends due to our one-tier corporate tax system. Under this system,
profits are taxed at the corporate level and is a final tax, the MOF said.
Singapore came after Bermuda, Cayman Islands, Netherlands and Switzerland in Oxfams ranking of 15 worst tax havens
in the world. The only other Asian city in the list is Hong Kong at ninth place.
35
New Related Party Transaction reporting (Form C)
36
Interest Rate Safe-Harbour
Para 13.27 -13.35 of TP Guidelines 4th edition: Not compulsory but alternative to performing detailed transfer pricing
analysis on their eligible related party loans. If safe-harbour not adopted, will need to support margin with TP
analysis and documentation.
1. Effective date: Related party loans obtained or provided from 1 January 2017 onwards
2. Eligible related party loans: Quantum not exceeding S$15 million (including committed but not utilized) at
the time the loan is obtained or provided. Both the Singapore-denominated and foreign currency denominated
eligible related party loans. Foreign currency denominated related party loan, the SGD equivalent of the loan
amount is to be determined based on the prevailing exchange rate at the time the loan is obtained or provided.
3. Indicative margin at the start of each year published on the IRAS:
Loans between 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2017 indicative rate: +250 bps (2.50%)
(https://www.iras.gov.sg/irashome/Businesses/Companies/Working-out-Corporate-Income-Taxes/Specific-
topics/Transfer-Pricing/Other-Issues/)
4. How it Works
Apply the indicative margin to an appropriate base reference rate as appropriate. e.g. Singapore Govt Securities
yield for fixed rate loans, SIBOR or LIBOR for floating rate loans.
37
Country-by-Country Reporting
38
BEPS Action 13
New Chapter V: CbC 3 Financial Data by Country
39
BEPS Action 13
New Chapter V: CbC 3 Financial Data by Country
40
Country-by-Country Reporting Who and When
1. The ultimate parent entity of the MNE group is tax resident in Singapore;
2. Consolidated group revenue for the MNE group in the preceding financial year is at least S$1,125 million; and
3.The MNE group has subsidiaries or operations in at least one foreign country.
When CbC Report should be submitted
Within 12 months from the end of the ultimate parent entity's financial year.
Example: Ultimate parent entity's FY ends in December:
The first set of CbC Report will relate to the financial period 1 Jan 2017 to 31 Dec 2017 (FY 2017). This
should be submitted to IRAS no later than 31 Dec 2018.
Ultimate parent entity's FY ends in March:
The first set of CbC Report will relate to the financial period 1 Apr 2017 to 31 Mar 2018 (FY 2017). This
should be submitted to IRAS no later than 31 Mar 2019.
41
Thank You!
Chintan
Manager
Complete Corporate Services Pte Ltd
chintanshah@complete-corp.com.sg
+65 63292718
+65 84363857
Disclaimer: This is a general presentation for information and educational purposes only and should not be construed as a professional advice. All rights reserved. The recipient
should not further circulate or use this material in any manner without prior consent of the author.
42